Log on / register
Feedback | Support | My details
A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools.
Katrak P, Bialocerkowski AE, Massy-Westropp N, Kumar S, Grimmer KA
BMC Med Res Methodol 2004 Sep 16, 4:22
[Full text] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]


printer friendly 
to  [Help]

PubMed Central articles that cite the above article:

1.
Transtheoretical model-based dietary interventions in primary care: a review of the evidence in diabetes.
Salmela S, Poskiparta M, Kasila K, Vähäsarja K, Vanhala M
Health Educ Res 2009 Apr, 24:237-52
[PubMed Central] [PubMed] [Related articles]

2.
The principles of weight of evidence validation of test methods and testing strategies. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 58.
Balls M, Amcoff P, Bremer S, Casati S, Coecke S, Clothier R, Combes R, Corvi R, Curren R, Eskes C, Fentem J, Gribaldo L, Halder M, Hartung T, Hoffmann S, Schectman L, Scott L, Spielmann H, Stokes W, Tice R, Wagner D, Zuang V, ECVAM
Altern Lab Anim 2006 Dec, 34:603-20
[PubMed Central] [PubMed] [Related articles]

3.
Evaluating the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials that Examine the Efficacy of Natural Health Products: A Systematic Review of Critical Appraisal Instruments.
Whelan AM, Jurgens TM, Lord L
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2009 Dec, 6:441-8
[PubMed Central] [PubMed] [Related articles]


This article is also cited by 2 articles in BioMed Central

printer friendly 
to  [Help]

© 1999-2009 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.