Log on / register
Feedback | Support | My details
Anogenital distance in human male and female newborns: a descriptive, cross-sectional study.
Salazar-Martinez E, Romano-Riquer P, Yanez-Marquez E, Longnecker MP, Hernandez-Avila M
Environ Health 2004, 3:8
[Full text] [PubMed] [Related articles]


printer friendly 
to  [Help]

PubMed Central articles that cite the above article:

1.
Phthalate exposure during pregnancy and lower anogenital index in boys: wider implications for the general population?
Sharpe RM
Environ Health Perspect 2005 Aug, 113:A504-5
 [PubMed Central] [PubMed] [Related articles]
2.
Validity of anogenital distance as a marker of in utero phthalate exposure.
McEwen GN, Renner G
Environ Health Perspect 2006 Jan, 114:A19-20; author reply A20-1
 [PubMed Central] [PubMed] [Related articles]
3.
In utero exposure to the antiandrogen 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene (DDE) in relation to anogenital distance in male newborns from Chiapas, México.
Longnecker MP, Gladen BC, Cupul-Uicab LA, Romano-Riquer SP, Weber JP, Chapin RE, Hernández-Avila M
Am J Epidemiol 2007 May 1, 165:1015-22
 [PubMed Central] [PubMed] [Related articles]
4.
Identification in rats of a programming window for reproductive tract masculinization, disruption of which leads to hypospadias and cryptorchidism.
Welsh M, Saunders PT, Fisken M, Scott HM, Hutchison GR, Smith LB, Sharpe RM
J Clin Invest 2008 Apr, 118:1479-90
 [PubMed Central] [PubMed] [Related articles]
printer friendly 
to  [Help]
Terms and Conditions Privacy statement Information for advertisers Jobs at BMC Contact us
© 1999-2009 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.