Log on / register
Feedback | Support | My details
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group.
Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Henry D, Hill S, Liberati A, O'Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schünemann H, Edejer TT, Vist GE, Williams JW, GRADE Working Group
BMC Health Serv Res 2004 Dec 22, 4:38
[Full text] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]


printer friendly 
to  [Help]

BioMed Central articles that cite the above article:

1.
36%36%

Review   
Bench-to-bedside review: The evaluation of complex interventions in critical care
Delaney A, Angus DC, Bellomo R, Cameron P, Cooper DJ, Finfer S, Harrison DA, Huang DT, Myburgh JA, Peake SL, Reade MC, Webb SAR, Yealy DM, the Australian Resuscitation in Sepsis Evaluation (ARISE), Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock (ProCESS) and Protocolised Management In Sepsis (ProMISe) investigators
Critical Care 2008, 12:210 (14 April 2008)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles]

2.
36%36%


Research article    
Comparison of international guideline programs to evaluate and update the Dutch program for clinical guideline development in physical therapy
Van der Wees PJ, Hendriks EJM, Custers JWH, Burgers JS, Dekker J, de Bie RA
BMC Health Services Research 2007, 7:191 (23 November 2007)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles]

3.
36%36%


Review    
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendations
Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD
Health Research Policy and Systems 2006, 4:21 (5 December 2006)
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]

4.
36%36%


Research article    
Gaining insight into the Clinical Practice Guideline development processes: qualitative study in a workshop to implement the GRADE proposal in Spain
Calderón C, Rotaeche R, Etxebarria A, Marzo M, Rico R, Barandiaran M
BMC Health Services Research 2006, 6:138 (23 October 2006)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles]

5.
36%36%


Debate    
A system for rating the stability and strength of medical evidence
Treadwell JR, Tregear SJ, Reston JT, Turkelson CM
BMC Medical Research Methodology 2006, 6:52 (19 October 2006)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]

6.
36%36%


Review    
Evidence-based medicine: Classifying the evidence from clinical trials the need to consider other dimensions
Bellomo R, Bagshaw SM
Critical Care 2006, 10:232 (4 October 2006)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles]

7.
36%36%


Correspondence    
Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?
Poolman RW, Struijs PAA, Krips R, Sierevelt IN, Lutz KH, Bhandari M
BMC Medical Research Methodology 2006, 6:44 (11 September 2006)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles]

8.
36%36%


Research article    
Methods underpinning national clinical guidelines for hypertension: describing the evidence shortfall
Campbell F, Dickinson HO, Cook JVF, Beyer FR, Eccles M, Mason JM
BMC Health Services Research 2006, 6:47 (5 April 2006)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles]

9.
36%36%


Research article    
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: Pilot study of a new system
Atkins D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Hill S, Jaeschke R, Liberati A, Magrini N, Mason J, O'Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schünemann H, Edejer TTT, Vist GE, Williams JW, The GRADE Working Group
BMC Health Services Research 2005, 5:25 (23 March 2005)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]


This article is also cited by a further 4 articles in PubMed Central


You can also check ISI Web of Science for additional citations (subscription required)
printer friendly 
to  [Help]

© 1999-2008 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated