BioMed Central | Articles which cite: Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group.

home journals A-Z subject areas advanced search authors reviewers libraries about my BioMed Central

Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group.
Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Henry D, Hill S, Liberati A, O'Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schünemann H, Edejer TT, Vist GE, Williams JW, GRADE Working Group
BMC Health Serv Res 2004 Dec 22, 4:38
[Full text] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]

printer friendly

to [Help]

BioMed Central articles that cite the above article:

Systematic review

Research article

Review and methods overview

3.2 million stillbirths: epidemiology and overview of the evidence review
Lawn JE, Yakoob MY, Haws RA, Soomro T, Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2009, 9(Suppl 1):S2 (7 May 2009)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]

Commentary

The need to reform our assessment of evidence from clinical trials: A commentary
Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2008, 3:23 (30 September 2008)
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles]

Review

Bench-to-bedside review: The evaluation of complex interventions in critical care
Delaney A, Angus DC, Bellomo R, Cameron P, Cooper DJ, Finfer S, Harrison DA, Huang DT, Myburgh JA, Peake SL, Reade MC, Webb SAR, Yealy DM, the Australian Resuscitation in Sepsis Evaluation (ARISE), Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock (ProCESS) and Protocolised Management In Sepsis (ProMISe) investigators
Critical Care 2008, 12:210 (14 April 2008)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]

Research article

Review

Research article

Debate

A system for rating the stability and strength of medical evidence
Treadwell JR, Tregear SJ, Reston JT, Turkelson CM
BMC Medical Research Methodology 2006, 6:52 (19 October 2006)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]

10.

Review

11.

Correspondence

Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?
Poolman RW, Struijs PAA, Krips R, Sierevelt IN, Lutz KH, Bhandari M
BMC Medical Research Methodology 2006, 6:44 (11 September 2006)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles]

12.

Research article

13.

Research article

Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: Pilot study of a new system
Atkins D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Hill S, Jaeschke R, Liberati A, Magrini N, Mason J, O'Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schünemann H, Edejer TTT, Vist GE, Williams JW, The GRADE Working Group
BMC Health Services Research 2005, 5:25 (23 March 2005)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]

This article is also cited by a further 7 articles in PubMed Central

You can also check ISI Web of Science for additional citations (subscription required)

printer friendly

to [Help]