Log on / register
Feedback | Support | My details
Determinants of abstract acceptance for the Digestive Diseases Week--a cross sectional study.
Timmer A, Hilsden RJ, Sutherland LR
BMC Med Res Methodol 2001, 1:13
[Full text] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]


printer friendly 
to  [Help]

BioMed Central articles that cite the above article:

1.
37%37%


Research article    
More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review
von Elm E, Costanza MC, Walder B, Tramèr MR
BMC Medical Research Methodology 2003, 3:12 (10 July 2003)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]

2.
37%37%


Research article    
Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts
Timmer A, Sutherland LR, Hilsden RJ
BMC Medical Research Methodology 2003, 3:2 (11 February 2003)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]

3.
37%37%


Research article    
Publication bias in gastroenterological research a retrospective cohort study based on abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting
Timmer A, Hilsden RJ, Cole J, Hailey D, Sutherland LR
BMC Medical Research Methodology 2002, 2:7 (26 April 2002)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]

printer friendly 
to  [Help]

© 1999-2008 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated