|
|
This article is part of the supplement: Highlights from the Fourth International Society for Computational Biology (ISCB) Student Council Symposium . Oral presentationRanking single nucleotide polymorphisms by potential deleterious effectsPhil Hyoun Lee School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 3N6
from Fourth International Society for Computational Biology (ISCB) Student Council Symposium BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9(Suppl 10):O6doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-S10-O6 The electronic version of this abstract is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/9/S10/O6
© 2008 Lee and Shatkay; licensee BioMed Central Ltd IntroductionIdentifying single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are responsible for common and complex diseases such as cancer is of major interest in current molecular epidemiology. However, due to the tremendous number of SNPs on the human genome, to expedite genotyping and analysis, there is a clear need to prioritize SNPs according to their potentially deleterious effects to human health. As of yet, there have been few efforts to quantitatively assess the possible deleterious effects of SNPs for effective genetic variation studies. Here we propose a new integrative scoring system for prioritizing SNPs based on their possible deleterious effects in a probabilistic framework. MethodsWe aim to quantitatively measure the potential deleterious effects of SNPs on four bio-molecular function of their genomic region, namely, splicing, transcription, translation, and post-translation modification. Figure 1 outlines the three main steps of our assessment process.
For simplicity, we refer to the assessed score as the functional significance (FS) score of a SNP. STEP 1. Retrieving Predicted Functional InformationGiven a set of SNPs, we first retrieve their predicted functional categories (i.e., 'deleterious' or 'neutral') and corresponding confidence scores for the decisions (i.e., S ∈ R) using 16 publicly available web-services and databases. The confidence scores are then normalized onto the common scale. STEP 2. Computing Tool ReliabilityWe define the Tool Reliability (TR) score as how likely each tool is to correctly predict deleterious SNPs, and estimate it based on the tendency of the tool to make consistent predictions with others, following the approach proposed by Long and his colleagues [1]. STEP 3. Computing Functional SignificanceGiven the prediction results and normalized confidence scores obtained in step I and the TR score computed in step II, the FS score of a SNP is computed as the average of the normalized confidence scores, weighted by the reliability of each tool, as summarized in Figure 1. ConclusionWe applied our method to 126,496 SNPs located in 607 disease-susceptible genes obtained from the OMIM [2] database (downloaded Jan. 2008). The assessment results show that splice sites and coding regions are most enriched with SNPs with highly putative deleterious effects, which is consistent with previous findings about functional SNPs [3]. We further validated our scoring system by checking out that the distribution of the FS scores for SNPs known to be disease-causing is significantly different from that of SNPs selected uniformly at random within the same gene (p-value 1.0303e-055, paired t-test, α = 0.05). References
Have something to say? Post a comment on this article! |
|
|
|
 |  | Log on / register Feedback | Support | My details |
on Google Scholar
author email
corresponding author email
Figure 1.|
|
| © 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media. |