Systematic reviews in epidemiology: why are we so ...[Int J Epidemiol. 2002]

SearchDatabase nameforSearch term

Advanced Search (beta)

Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's Web applications. More information here...

Display Show

All: 1

Review: 1

Click to change filter selection through MyNCBI.

1: Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):6-12. Links

Comment in:: Int J Epidemiol. 2003 Feb;32(1):164-5.

Systematic reviews in epidemiology: why are we so far behind?

Dickersin K.

Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence-based Healthcare, Department of Community Health Box G-S2, 169 Angell Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA. Kay_Dickersin@brown.edu

PMID: 11914282 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Review[Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: how should they be performed, evaluated and used?] [Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004]
Why systematic reviews? [J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000]
ReviewSystematic reviews of surgical interventions. [Surg Clin North Am. 2006]
Further statistics in dentistry Part 8: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. [Br Dent J. 2003]
Problems with meta-analysis. [N Z Med J. 1999]

Display Show

Systematic reviews in epidemiology: why are we so far behind?

Related Articles