A comparison of signal sequence prediction methods...[Bioinformatics. 2000]

SearchDatabase nameforSearch term

Advanced Search

Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's Web applications. More information here...

Display Show

All: 1

Review: 0

Click to change filter selection through MyNCBI.

1: Bioinformatics. 2000 Aug;16(8):741-2. Links

A comparison of signal sequence prediction methods using a test set of signal peptides.

Menne KM, Hermjakob H, Apweiler R.

EMBL Outstation Hinxton - The European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SD, UK.

We describe the creation of a test set containing secretory and non-secretory proteins. Five existing prediction programs for signal sequences and their cleavage sites are compared on the basis of this test set: SPScan, SigCleave, SignalP V1.1, SignalP V2.0. b2-HMM and SignalP V2.0.b2-NN.

PMID: 11099261 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Signal peptide prediction based on analysis of experimentally verified cleavage sites. [Protein Sci. 2004]
ReviewMachine learning approaches for the prediction of signal peptides and other protein sorting signals. [Protein Eng. 1999]
Signal-3L: A 3-layer approach for predicting signal peptides. [Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007]
Human secretory signal peptide description by hidden Markov model and generation of a strong artificial signal peptide for secreted protein expression. [Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002]
ReviewSignal peptides of secreted proteins of the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus: a genomic survey. [Arch Microbiol. 2002]

Display Show

A comparison of signal sequence prediction methods using a test set of signal peptides.

Related Articles