|
Editorial
Boycott highlights Open Access alternatives
October was quite a remarkable month for the
Open Access movement. The Public Library of
Science (PLoS) became a fully fledged publisher
with the launch of its flagship journal PLoS
Biology. The Wellcome Trust and the Max
Planck Society expressed the increasingly firm
commitment of European funding agencies to
supporting Open Access publishing. And a group
of US academics called for a boycott of
Cell Press.
Two researchers from the University of
California's San Francisco campus, Peter Walter
and Keith Yamamoto, circulated a letter asking
colleagues to boycott the prestigious Cell Press
journals, to protest about the high prices Cell
Press is charging for electronic site licenses.
Although site licences initially offered university
libraries a way to deal with offering campus-wide
access, they represent a financial trap as
the libraries are then locked into a system that
can be milked by the publisher.
This is not the first time that scientists have
circulated a boycott letter about publishing.
Many will remember signing the PLoS petition
that asked researchers to boycott any journal that
did not provide rapid free access to research
papers. The PLoS boycott didn't achieve its
intended effect or drastically change publishers'
minds, leading PLoS to decide to become an
Open Access publisher itself.
While many researchers were happy to sign a
letter supporting the PLoS boycott, they still
needed to publish their work and to receive the
'career credit' that prestigious journals can bring. But the Open Access landscape is quite different
now from how it was then and there are many
more alternatives. Furthermore, there are now
two 'top tier' Open Access journals, Journal of Biology (published by BioMed Central) and
PLoS Biology, which are vying to provide Open
Access to the very best work and both of which
provide a real alternative to the Cell Press titles.
And there is now a range of other Open Access
journals for more specialized articles.
What is important is not how many people sign
a boycott letter, or even how many refuse to
serve as referees for Cell Press. The most
decisive act of protest is to switch to publishing
in Open Access journals.
|