<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>1471-2164-7-184</ui>
   <ji>1471-2164</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Research article</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Analysis of bacteria-challenged wild silkmoth, <it>Antheraea mylitta </it>(lepidoptera) transcriptome reveals potential immune genes</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1" ce="yes">
               <snm>Gandhe</snm>
               <mi>S</mi>
               <fnm>Archana</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>archana@cdfd.org</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A2" ce="yes">
               <snm>Arunkumar</snm>
               <mi>P</mi>
               <fnm>K</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>arun@cdfd.org.in</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A3">
               <snm>John</snm>
               <mi>H</mi>
               <fnm>Serene</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>hserene@cdfd.org.in</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A4" ca="yes">
               <snm>Nagaraju</snm>
               <fnm>J</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>jnagaraju@cdfd.org.in</email>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1">
               <p>Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, ECIL Road, Nacharam, Hyderabad 500076, India</p>
            </ins>
         </insg>
         <source>BMC Genomics</source>
         <issn>1471-2164</issn>
         <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
         <volume>7</volume>
         <issue>1</issue>
         <fpage>184</fpage>
         <url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/7/184</url>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubidlist>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">16857061</pubid>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-7-184</pubid>
            </pubidlist>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <rec>
            <date>
               <day>04</day>
               <month>4</month>
               <year>2006</year>
            </date>
         </rec>
         <acc>
            <date>
               <day>21</day>
               <month>7</month>
               <year>2006</year>
            </date>
         </acc>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>21</day>
               <month>7</month>
               <year>2006</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
      <cpyrt>
         <year>2006</year>
         <collab>Gandhe et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab>
         <note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note>
      </cpyrt>
      <abs>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Abstract</p>
            </st>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Background</p>
               </st>
               <p>In the recent years a strong resemblance has been observed between the insect immune system and the mammalian innate immune mechanisms suggesting their common origin. Among the insects, only the dipterans (<it>Drosophila </it>and various mosquito species) have been widely investigated for their immune responses towards diverse pathogens. In the present study we constructed and analysed the immune transcriptome of the lepidopteran <it>Antheraea mylitta</it>, an economically important Indian tasar silkmoth with a view to unravel the potential immune-related genes and pathways.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Results</p>
               </st>
               <p>An expressed sequence tag (EST) library was constructed from mRNA obtained from fat bodies of <it>A. mylitta </it>larvae that had been challenged by infection with <it>Escherichia coli </it>cells. We identified 719 unique ESTs from a total of 1412 sequences so generated. A third of the transcriptome showed similarity with previously characterized immune-related genes that included both the known and putative immune genes. Of the four putative novel defence proteins (DFPs) annotated by PSI-BLAST three showed similarity to extracellular matrix proteins from vertebrates implicated in innate immunity, while the fourth was similar to, yet distinct from, the anti-microbial protein cecropin. Finally, we analysed the expression profiles of 15 potential immune-related genes, and the majority of them were induced more prominently with <it>E. coli </it>compared to <it>Micrococcus luteus</it>. We also identified several unknown proteins, some of which could have probable immune-related functions based on the results of the ProDom analysis.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Conclusion</p>
               </st>
               <p>The present study has identified many potential immune-related genes in <it>A. mylitta </it>some of which are vertebrate homologues and others are hitherto unreported putative defence proteins. Several genes were present as members of gene families, as has also been observed in other insect species.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
      </abs>
   </fm>
   <meta>
      <classifications>
         <classification type="bmc" subtype="user_supplied_xml" id="endnote"/>
      </classifications>
   </meta>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Background</p>
         </st>
         <p>Insects are evolutionarily successful organisms and occupy almost all habitats in nature. An efficient immune system is one of the attributes for this evolutionary success. However, unlike mammals, the insects lack an adaptive immune system. The insect immune response is comprised of cellular and humoral components. The former involves the action of haemocytes in phagocytosis of microbes, encapsulation of large pathogens and nodule formation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp> whereas the latter involves activation of prophenoloxidase cascade leading to melanisation of invading microorganisms <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp> and synthesis of a battery of anti-microbial peptides <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>Insect immunity is well studied in dipterans such as fruit flies and mosquito species <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp>. Only limited information is available on genes induced on pathogen challenge in a few lepidopteran species that include the domesticated silkmoth, <it>Bombyx mori </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr></abbrgrp>, Cecropia moth,<it>Hyalophora cecropia </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp> and tobacco hornworm,<it>Manduca sexta </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp> and in these too the immune response pathways employed to combat pathogen infections remain to be fully characterised.</p>
         <p>Abundant genetic resources are now available for <it>B. mori</it>, with a 9 X shotgun sequence coverage of its genome and more than 100,000 ESTs in dbEST (NCBI) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr></abbrgrp>. With reference to insect immunity, the ESTs have been obtained from baculovirus-infected <it>B. mori </it>cultured cells and pupae, but no large scale information on bacteria-induced immune genes is as yet available.</p>
         <p>In this study, we have constructed and analysed an immune transcriptome following bacterial challenge of the Indian tasar wild silkmoth, <it>Antheraea mylitta</it>, an economically important lepidopteran cultivated for silk production. Prior information on immune response genes in wild silkmoths is lacking except for a few peripheral studies. Two proteins from <it>A. mylitta </it>&#8211; a lysozyme protein, 3-D structure of which is elucidated <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr></abbrgrp> and a protease inhibitor have been characterized <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp>. We chose to examine the fat body transcriptome since it is a major immune organ in insects, analogous to the mammalian liver. We generated a total of 1412 ESTs, of which 31% could be ascribed to putative immune functions. We also validated the upregulation of a selected subset of genes from the immune transcriptome by semi-quantitative RT-PCR.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Results and discussion</p>
         </st>
         <p>As described in Materials and Methods, we constructed a cDNA library from fat body tissues of <it>E. coli</it>- challenged <it>A. mylitta </it>larvae and randomly sequenced a large number of inserts from the library. By running TGICL program, we obtained 719 clusters from a total of 1412 ESTs, of which 166 were contigs (comprising 859 ESTs) and 553 were singletons. The majority of the EST clusters were 500 to 600 bp, with an average of 524 bp and a maximum of 1994 bp (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). Each of these clusters potentially represents a unique gene from <it>A. mylitta</it>, and our results have hence expanded the number of genes known for this organism from the handful previously known genes. The 1412 EST sequences (accession numbers EB742119- EB743530) can be accessed at the NCBI EST sequence database, dbEST and the 719 clusters can be accessed at URL mentioned in references <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <fig id="F1">
            <title>
               <p>Figure 1</p>
            </title>
            <caption>
               <p>Distribution of read lengths of <it>A. mylitta </it>ESTs and clusters</p>
            </caption>
            <text>
               <p>Distribution of read lengths of <it>A. mylitta </it>ESTs and clusters. (a) Read lengths of 1412 ESTs. (b) Read lengths of clusters.</p>
            </text>
            <graphic file="1471-2164-7-184-1"/>
         </fig>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>BLAST analysis</p>
            </st>
            <p>The different ESTs were classified into categories such as immune-related, housekeeping, hypothetical insect proteins, hypothetical non-insect proteins based on the homology in NCBI protein BLAST (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). Of the 1412 ESTs, 432 (31%) showed similarity to known or putative insect immune proteins; thus, even though the cDNA library was not normalized, a significant proportion (one-third) of the transcriptome was represented by putative immune-related genes. A total of 569 ESTs (39%) were homologous to housekeeping genes and proteins involved in functions other than immunity. Functional class distribution of the ESTs is depicted in Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>. Based on the sequence similarity, 679 of the 1412 ESTs were classified as insect-specific (224 of the 719 clusters) and 409 ESTs (204 clusters) were common to both insects and mammals (Figure <figr fid="F2">2a</figr> and <figr fid="F2">2b</figr>). The number of ESTs showing similarity to only the mammalian proteins was 14 and those showing similarity neither to insects nor to mammals were as few as 13. Gene Ontology analysis of the EST sequences was also carried out and the details are provided as supplementary data (see <supplr sid="S1">Additional data file 1</supplr>).</p>
            <suppl id="S1">
               <title>
                  <p>Additional data file 1</p>
               </title>
               <text>
                  <p><supplr sid="S1">Additional data file 1</supplr> includes the results, methodology and schematic representation of Gene Ontology analysis of the ESTs.</p>
               </text>
               <file name="1471-2164-7-184-S1.pdf">
                  <p>Click here for file</p>
               </file>
            </suppl>
            <tbl id="T1">
               <title>
                  <p>Table 1</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Classification of EST functional class categories based on similarity searches with NCBI protein database. </p>
               </caption>
               <tblbdy cols="2">
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <b>Category</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <b>No. of ESTs</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="2">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Total no. of ESTs</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>1412 (100%)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Immune-related</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>432 (31%)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Housekeeping genes and other genes not involved in immunity</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>569 (39%)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Hypothetical/unknown insect proteins</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>135 (9.5%)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Hypothetical/unknown non-insect proteins</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>50 (3.5%)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Weak homology in NCBI*</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>170 (12%)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>No homology in NCBI</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>56 (3.9%)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
               </tblbdy>
               <tblfn>
                  <p>Percentage value of each category is in parenthesis. *- Hits with relatively less similarity (E value>1e &#8211; 05).</p>
               </tblfn>
            </tbl>
            <fig id="F2">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 2</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Classification of ESTs (a) and Clusters (b) based on the number of sequences showing similarity to insect and or mammalian proteins in NCBI protein nr database</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p>Classification of ESTs (a) and Clusters (b) based on the number of sequences showing similarity to insect and or mammalian proteins in NCBI protein nr database. X-axis: 1) Insect, 2) Insect and Mammal, 3) Unknown, 4) Mammal, 5) Neither Insect nor Mammal, Y-axis: Number of sequences.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1471-2164-7-184-2"/>
            </fig>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Domain search</p>
            </st>
            <p>The sequences, which could not be assigned any function based on homology search in NCBI, were searched for conserved domains in ProDom database. Of the 260 clusters that had no matches with known proteins in NCBI BLAST, we could assign protein domain families to 196 clusters based on the ProDom search (see <supplr sid="S2">Additional data file 2</supplr>). The remaining sequences did not show any hits in ProDom and should be further analysed by other specialized computational tools.</p>
            <suppl id="S2">
               <title>
                  <p>Additional data file 2</p>
               </title>
               <text>
                  <p><supplr sid="S2">Additional data file 2</supplr> is a table listing the ProDom based annotation of the clusters that did not find any matches in NCBI protein BLAST analysis.</p>
               </text>
               <file name="1471-2164-7-184-S2.pdf">
                  <p>Click here for file</p>
               </file>
            </suppl>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Signal peptide and transmembrane domains</p>
            </st>
            <p>We further screened the unannotated proteins (no hits or hits with hypothetical proteins in NCBI database) for the presence of signal peptide and absence of transmembrane domains. This characteristic of many of the immune proteins has been utilized to screen probable immune-related genes in large-scale transcriptome studies <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr></abbrgrp>, although the reliability of this criterion to identify the immune related genes remains to be experimentally tested. In the present study, 25 out of 260 genes tested fulfilled these criteria and could be considered as potential immune-responsive genes. However, since all the 260 clusters checked are not all full-length sequences, it is possible that we may have missed some others amongst them that represent gene products harbouring signal peptide without transmembrane domain, and hence the actual number may be higher.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Putative immune proteins</p>
            </st>
            <p>A total of 80 clusters were assigned a putative immune function based on their similarity with previously characterized immune response genes and their distribution pattern is shown in Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>. These putative immune proteins were categorized into different functional groups &#8211; i. anti-microbial proteins, ii. pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), iii. proteases and protease inhibitors and iv. putative defence proteins with unknown function. A subset of these putative immune genes (thirty-eight) is represented with the details like GenBank accession numbers, putative function, E-value (BLAST) etc (see <supplr sid="S3">Additional data file 3</supplr>). Homologues of several other proteins, implicated in immunity such as antioxidants, ferritins, transferrins, apolipophorins and apoptotic pathway components were also found, but are not further described here.</p>
            <fig id="F3">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 3</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Distribution of immune-related transcripts in <it>A. mylitta </it>fat body transcriptome</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p>Distribution of immune-related transcripts in <it>A. mylitta </it>fat body transcriptome. The figure in parenthesis indicates the number of isoforms identified in that particular gene family.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1471-2164-7-184-3"/>
            </fig>
            <suppl id="S3">
               <title>
                  <p>Additional data file 3</p>
               </title>
               <text>
                  <p>A table representing some of the putative immune genes from the transcriptome is provided as an <supplr sid="S3">Additional data file 3</supplr></p>
               </text>
               <file name="1471-2164-7-184-S3.pdf">
                  <p>Click here for file</p>
               </file>
            </suppl>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Putative anti-microbial proteins</p>
               </st>
               <p>Attacin-like proteins were the most abundantly expressed transcripts in terms of EST copy number in the immune transcriptome (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>). Six different types of putative attacins accounted for 34% (148 ESTs) of the immune transcripts. A previous study had reported the presence of four types of attacins in <it>D. melanogaster </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp> and a similar study in immunized pupae of <it>H. cecropia </it>led to the isolation of six closely related types of attacins <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>. Second in the list of highly expressed genes were cecropin-like proteins (55 ESTs, ~13%). Three types of cecropin homologues were found in the <it>A. mylitta </it>transcriptome and a previous study in <it>H. cecropia </it>had similarly shown the existence of three types of cecropins <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>. Three types of putative lysozyme transcripts were detected, one of which was homologous to a bacteriophage T7 lysozyme-like protein reported in <it>B. mori </it>that was later named, based on functional analysis, as a peptidoglycan recognition protein <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp>. The second was homologous to the bacteriolytic lepidopteran lysozymes known to lyse the bacterial cell wall <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp>. The third was a lysozyme-like protein that lacks one or both of catalytic residues essential for muramidase activity. This protein has not been reported in lepidopterans before and is homologous to dipteran lysozyme-like proteins of unknown function. Three types of putative lebocins and gloverins, which are the lepidopteran specific anti-bacterial genes, were also observed in <it>A. mylitta </it>transcriptome.</p>
               <tbl id="T2">
                  <title>
                     <p>Table 2</p>
                  </title>
                  <caption>
                     <p>The abundant genes in <it>A. mylitta </it>transcriptome. </p>
                  </caption>
                  <tblbdy cols="2">
                     <r>
                        <c ca="left">
                           <p>
                              <b>Gene definition</b>
                           </p>
                        </c>
                        <c ca="center">
                           <p>
                              <b>No of ESTs</b>
                           </p>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                     <r>
                        <c cspan="2">
                           <hr/>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                     <r>
                        <c ca="left">
                           <p>Attacin</p>
                        </c>
                        <c ca="center">
                           <p>96</p>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                     <r>
                        <c ca="left">
                           <p>Cecropin D</p>
                        </c>
                        <c ca="center">
                           <p>31</p>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                     <r>
                        <c ca="left">
                           <p>Defense protein 1</p>
                        </c>
                        <c ca="center">
                           <p>30</p>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                     <r>
                        <c ca="left">
                           <p>Ribosomal protein S2, Attacin</p>
                        </c>
                        <c ca="center">
                           <p>26</p>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                     <r>
                        <c ca="left">
                           <p>Elongation factor 1&#945;</p>
                        </c>
                        <c ca="center">
                           <p>24</p>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                     <r>
                        <c ca="left">
                           <p>Hemolin</p>
                        </c>
                        <c ca="center">
                           <p>23</p>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                     <r>
                        <c ca="left">
                           <p>Attacin</p>
                        </c>
                        <c ca="center">
                           <p>22</p>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                     <r>
                        <c ca="left">
                           <p>Cecropin</p>
                        </c>
                        <c ca="center">
                           <p>17</p>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                     <r>
                        <c ca="left">
                           <p>Ferritin</p>
                        </c>
                        <c ca="center">
                           <p>15</p>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                     <r>
                        <c ca="left">
                           <p>Mucin</p>
                        </c>
                        <c ca="center">
                           <p>13</p>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                  </tblbdy>
                  <tblfn>
                     <p>The number of ESTs indicates the transcript abundance for each of the category</p>
                  </tblfn>
               </tbl>
               <p>The data generated in the present study conformed to the trend of anti-microbial genes being present as multiple gene families as observed in many other insect species and highlighted the essentiality of these genes in the organism <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp>. Another interesting finding with respect to immune response was the presence of a protein identical to seroin. This protein is reported to express in the silk glands of <it>B. mori </it>and is known to protect the cocoon from microbes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>. A homologue of anti-fungal protein, gallerimycin, previously characterized from <it>Galleria mellonella </it>and shown to be induced by LPS injection <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr></abbrgrp>, was also found.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Putative pattern recognition receptors (PRRs)</p>
               </st>
               <p>PRRs in the insects bind to and detect pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) like lipopolysaccharide, peptidoglycan, &#946; 1&#8211;3 glucan, lipotechoic acid etc <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>. The putative PRRs identified in the present immune transcriptome analysis were hemolins, peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs), gram-negative binding proteins (GNBPs), lectins and mucins. <it>A. mylitta </it>fat body transcriptome revealed two different proteins resembling hemolin, an immune inducible protein implicated in insect immunity <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr></abbrgrp> and it would be worthwhile to study the function and specificities of the different proteins of hemolin family. Three types of PGRP-like proteins were found in the <it>A. mylitta </it>immune repertoire in the present study as compared to <it>D. melanogaster </it>where 13 PGRP genes are known to be involved in the activation of the various effector pathways in immunity <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Putative proteases and protease inhibitors</p>
               </st>
               <p>Various proteases and protease inhibitors regulate the diverse immune mechanisms like melanization, phagocytosis and induction of anti-microbial peptides <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp>. A homologue of a prophenoloxidase activating protease characterized in <it>B. mori </it>and <it>M. sexta </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp> was also found in the <it>A. mylitta </it>immune transcriptome. Several other classes of putative proteases like cysteine proteases, serine proteases and metallo-proteases were also identified. As many as thirteen distinct serpin-like (serine protease inhibitors) and twelve potential protease inhibitors were detected in the immune transcriptome. Five different serpins have earlier been identified in <it>M. sexta </it>and shown to differ in the induction pattern upon immune challenge <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>. In the light of these studies, the information on serpins and protease inhibitors from the <it>A. mylitta </it>immune transcriptome will prove to be invaluable in further understanding of various immune pathways in insects.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Putative defence proteins with unknown function</p>
               </st>
               <p>Several potential new members of known protein families were identified in the present study. Among the new members, one was a putative lysozyme-like protein described in the previous section. An array of putative proteinase inhibitors and proteases were also found. Many of them are new, and their study would enhance our understanding of the mechanisms of proteolytic cascades in insect innate immunity. A few immunoglobulin (Ig) like molecules were identified by ProDom search (see <supplr sid="S2">Additional data file 2</supplr>). Ig-like molecules- hemolin <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr></abbrgrp> and more recently Dscam have been implicated in insect immunity <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B28">28</abbr><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr></abbrgrp> and it would be interesting to evaluate the role of these putative Ig-like molecules in insects. Among the potential immune proteins, we describe below in more detail four putative defence proteins (DFPs), for two of which (DFP-1 and DFP-4) we have confirmed the induction upon <it>E. coli </it>infection by semi-quantitative RT-PCR.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>DFP-1, DFP-2 and DFP-3</p>
               </st>
               <p>We have grouped these three proteins together, as they are 70&#8211;85% similar to each other (DFP-1&amp;DFP-3 = 85%, DFP-1&amp;DFP-2 = 79% and DFP-2&amp;DFP-3 = 77%). All of them have a signal peptide and appear to be secretory proteins. DFP-1 was abundantly expressed in the immune transcriptome suggesting its possible involvement in immunity. In addition, these three proteins showed high similarity to immune induced unknown proteins from other lepidopterans like <it>Hyphantria cunea</it>, <it>Samia cynthia ricini</it>,<it>M. sexta </it>and <it>Lonomia obliqua </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr></abbrgrp> (Figure <figr fid="F4">4</figr>), as also with some hypothetical proteins from other insects and vertebrates in the NCBI database (see <supplr sid="S4">Additional data file 4</supplr>). Analysis by Position-specific iterative BLAST (PSI-BLAST) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr></abbrgrp> revealed similarity of DFP-1, 2 and 3 to the vertebrate extracellular matrix proteins (ECM), stromal cell derived factor receptor-2, spondin and reelin and possessed the common domain termed as 'reeler' (Table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr>). These ECM proteins are involved in the central nervous system signaling and immune mechanisms like 'signaling' and 'pathogen recognition' <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr></abbrgrp>. Stromal cell derived factor/receptor complex has been shown to activate JAK/STAT pathway and mediate the migration and proliferation of haematopoietic cells <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr></abbrgrp>. Recently, mindin a protein belonging to the F-spondin family has been shown to act as a pathogen recognition receptor in mice <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr></abbrgrp>. Also, spondin has been shown to be upregulated in <it>Drosophila </it>upon bacterial infection by microarray analysis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B36">36</abbr></abbrgrp>. The similarity of DFP-1, 2 and 3 to molecules involved in immune responses in vertebrates further support the immune-related role of these new proteins.</p>
               <fig id="F4">
                  <title>
                     <p>Figure 4</p>
                  </title>
                  <caption>
                     <p>Multiple sequence alignment of DFP-1, 2 and 3 amino acid sequences with homologues from other lepidopterans</p>
                  </caption>
                  <text>
                     <p>Multiple sequence alignment of DFP-1, 2 and 3 amino acid sequences with homologues from other lepidopterans. <it>Lonomia obliqua </it>[GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AAV91350">AAV91350</ext-link>], <it>Manduca sexta </it>[GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AAO21507">AAO21507</ext-link>], <it>Samia cynthia ricini </it>[GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="BAD05929">BAD05929</ext-link>], <it>Hyphantria cunea </it>[GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AAD09280">AAD09280</ext-link>] protein sequences, respectively. Black and grey shades indicate the identical and similar amino acid residues, respectively.</p>
                  </text>
                  <graphic file="1471-2164-7-184-4"/>
               </fig>
               <suppl id="S4">
                  <title>
                     <p>Additional data file 4</p>
                  </title>
                  <text>
                     <p><supplr sid="S4">Additional data file 4</supplr> is a table that lists the hits obtained by NCBI protein BLAST analysis of DFP-1, 2, 3 and 4.</p>
                  </text>
                  <file name="1471-2164-7-184-S4.pdf">
                     <p>Click here for file</p>
                  </file>
               </suppl>
               <tbl id="T3">
                  <title>
                     <p>Table 3</p>
                  </title>
                  <caption>
                     <p>Proteins similar to putative defence proteins (DFPs) revealed by PSI-BLAST analysis. </p>
                  </caption>
                  <tblbdy cols="2">
                     <r>
                        <c ca="left">
                           <p>
                              <b>Novel proteins from <it>A. mylitta</it></b>
                           </p>
                        </c>
                        <c ca="left">
                           <p>
                              <b>Description and function of proteins similar to DFPs.</b>
                           </p>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                     <r>
                        <c cspan="2">
                           <hr/>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                     <r>
                        <c ca="left">
                           <p>
                              <b>DFP-1, DFP-2, DFP-3</b>
                           </p>
                        </c>
                        <c ca="left">
                           <p>
                              <b>1. Stromal cell derived factor receptor 2 homologue</b>
                           </p>
                           <p><it>Homo sapiens </it>[GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="NM_001013660.1">NM_001013660.1</ext-link>]</p>
                           <p>(catecholamine catabolism) reeler domain</p>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                     <r>
                        <c>
                           <p/>
                        </c>
                        <c>
                           <p/>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                     <r>
                        <c>
                           <p/>
                        </c>
                        <c ca="left">
                           <p>
                              <b>2. Spondin</b>
                           </p>
                           <p><it>Bos taurus </it>[GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="Q9GLX9">Q9GLX9</ext-link>]</p>
                           <p><it>H. sapiens </it>[GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="Q9HCB6">Q9HCB6</ext-link>]</p>
                           <p>Extracellular matrix, cell adhesion protein that promotes the attachment of spinal cord and sensory neuron cells</p>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                     <r>
                        <c>
                           <p/>
                        </c>
                        <c>
                           <p/>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                     <r>
                        <c>
                           <p/>
                        </c>
                        <c ca="left">
                           <p>
                              <b>3. Reelin precursor</b>
                           </p>
                           <p><it>H. sapiens </it>[GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="P78509">P78509</ext-link>]</p>
                           <p>Extracellular matrix serine protease. Enzymatic activity is important for the modulation of cell adhesion</p>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                     <r>
                        <c cspan="2">
                           <hr/>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                     <r>
                        <c ca="left">
                           <p>
                              <b>DFP-4</b>
                           </p>
                        </c>
                        <c ca="left">
                           <p>
                              <b>Cecropin D precursor</b>
                           </p>
                           <p><it>L. obliqua </it>[GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AAV91462">AAV91462</ext-link>]</p>
                        </c>
                     </r>
                  </tblbdy>
                  <tblfn>
                     <p>The GenBank accession numbers are given in parentheses.</p>
                  </tblfn>
               </tbl>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>DFP-4</p>
               </st>
               <p>This protein was particularly intriguing as it showed similarity to cecropin, the insect anti-bacterial peptides in the primary sequence BLAST analysis. The multiple alignment of the various cecropins and DFP-4 is shown in Figure <figr fid="F5">5</figr>. Based on the SignalP prediction, DFP-4 is likely to be a non-secretory intracellular protein, unlike cecropins that are secreted into the haemolymph. Cecropins are small 5&#8211;6 KD peptides whereas DFP-4 is a 17 KD protein with additional unrelated regions at the N and C-termini. The exact role of DFP-4 is not clear and needs to be investigated.</p>
               <fig id="F5">
                  <title>
                     <p>Figure 5</p>
                  </title>
                  <caption>
                     <p>Multiple sequence alignment of DFP-4 with cecropins from other lepidopterans</p>
                  </caption>
                  <text>
                     <p>Multiple sequence alignment of DFP-4 with cecropins from other lepidopterans. <it>L. obliqua </it>putative cecropin [GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AAV91462">AAV91462</ext-link>], <it>M. sexta </it>cecropin [GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AAO74638">AAO74638</ext-link>], <it>B. mori </it>cecropin D [GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="BAE53371">BAE53371</ext-link>], <it>Helicoverpa armigera </it>cecropin [GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AAX51193.1">AAX51193.1</ext-link>]. The unique regions of DFP-4 (no homology to cecropins) are boxed.</p>
                  </text>
                  <graphic file="1471-2164-7-184-5"/>
               </fig>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Expression profile</p>
            </st>
            <p>The transcriptome under study most likely represents a plethora of <it>E. coli</it>-induced genes in the fat body of the tasar silkmoth. We validated 15 putative immune response genes by semi-quantitative RT-PCR, and their expression profiles are shown in Figure <figr fid="F6">6</figr>. All but two genes, a putative protease inhibitor [GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="DQ666519">DQ666519</ext-link>] and a seroin gene [GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="DQ666525">DQ666525</ext-link>] were upregulated upon infection. The two DFPs tested, DFP-1 [GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="DQ666501">DQ666501</ext-link>] and DFP-4 [GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="DQ666503">DQ666503</ext-link>], were induced by both <it>E. coli </it>and <it>M. luteus</it>. DFP-1 was highly expressed in all the tissues with a more prominent expression in mid gut whereas DFP-4 was exclusively expressed in fat body (Figure <figr fid="F6">6</figr>). We analysed the expression pattern of the aforementioned genes in larval tissues differentially challenged with <it>E. coli </it>(gram-negative) or <it>M. luteus </it>(gram-positive) and compared with challenged or mock-challenged (saline-injected) tissues as negative controls. Most of the genes analysed were expressed more prominently upon infection with <it>E. coli </it>than with <it>M. luteus </it>suggesting that there may be differential responses towards different pathogens. Two pathways of differential immune induction have been identified in <it>Drosophila</it>. Gram-positive bacteria and fungi induce the Toll pathway whereas gram-negative bacteria evoke the Imd pathway <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B37">37</abbr></abbrgrp>, but the degree of conservation of these pathways between Drosophila and lepidopterans is not known.</p>
            <fig id="F6">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 6</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>RT-PCR profiles of 15 putative immune genes from 4 differentially challenged tissues of 5<sup>th </sup>instar larvae</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p>RT-PCR profiles of 15 putative immune genes from 4 differentially challenged tissues of 5<sup>th </sup>instar larvae. E- <it>E. coli </it>challenged, M- <it>M. luteus </it>challenged, S- saline-injected, U- unchallenged. Actin was used as an endogenous control. The GenBank accession numbers of the 15 genes are provided as additional data (see <supplr sid="S5">Additional data file 5</supplr>).</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1471-2164-7-184-6"/>
            </fig>
            <suppl id="S5">
               <title>
                  <p>Additional file 5</p>
               </title>
               <text>
                  <p>Primer sequences of the 15 transcripts analysed by RT-PCR have been provided in <supplr sid="S5">Additional data file 5</supplr>.</p>
               </text>
               <file name="1471-2164-7-184-S5.pdf">
                  <p>Click here for file</p>
               </file>
            </suppl>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Conclusion</p>
         </st>
         <p>The immune response in insects is dynamic and different effector genes are likely expressed at different time points during infection, contributing to the ability of the insects to ward off infections in spite of the absence of adaptive immunity. The current transcriptome represents genes likely expressed upon <it>E. coli </it>infection in the <it>A. mylitta </it>fat body at 24 hrs post infection. Unexpectedly, the Imd pathway components that are implicated in the activation of various effector pathways upon gram-negative bacterial infection in <it>Drosophila </it>were not present in our transcriptome. The 24-hour post infection period may have been non-optimal for expression of some genes, and since the EST library was not normalized the less abundant transcripts may have gone undetected. Alternatively, it is possible that other pathways are involved in the immune induction in the moths.</p>
         <p>The present study has increased the repertoire of lepidopteran-specific putative immune response genes by several hundred-fold. This will be a valuable resource for lepidopteran-specific immune studies in particular and insect immune studies in general.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Methods</p>
         </st>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Insects, bacterial inoculation and tissue collection</p>
            </st>
            <p><it>A. mylitta</it>, 5<sup>th </sup>instar, day 3 larvae were procured from Regional Research Station, Warangal, Andhra Pradesh. Log phase <it>E. coli </it>cells (DH5&#945;), washed and resuspended in saline (0.3 M NaCl, 0.005 M KCl), were injected into the haemocoel of the larvae as described earlier <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B38">38</abbr></abbrgrp>. At 24 hours post infection (hpi), larvae were dissected to isolate fat body, and the tissue was flash frozen in liquid N<sub>2 </sub>and then stored at -70&#176;C till further use.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>cDNA library construction and generation of ESTs</p>
            </st>
            <p>Total RNA was extracted from the fat body using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). The complementary DNA synthesis was carried out using Stratagene ZAP-cDNA<sup>&#174; </sup>synthesis kit following manufacturer's instructions. Directional cDNA library was constructed by cloning of cDNA fragments into pBluescript II SK (+) vector and electroporation into <it>E. coli </it>strain DH10B. Insert-containing plasmid clones were sequenced with RV-M primer (5'GAG CGG ATA ACA ATT TCA CAC AGG 3') with the aid of MegaBACE3000 sequencer.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>EST processing</p>
            </st>
            <p>Raw sequences obtained from sequence chromatograms were processed using several programs. A cut-off Phred Quality Value of &#8805;15 was assigned to extract quality sequences from chromatograms. The quality sequences were screened for the presence of vector sequences using 'Cross Match' program <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr></abbrgrp>. Then masked vector sequences were automatically removed by in-house developed trimming tool. Sequences shorter than 50 bases were removed. The resulting high-quality sequences were assembled into sequence contigs with the TGICL program <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B40">40</abbr></abbrgrp>, which initially makes clusters using MegaBLAST and thereafter makes an assembly using CAP3 for each cluster generated in the first step. A cluster is defined as a unique sequence obtained either by multiple alignment of many sequences that are > 95% similar or derived from a single sequence. A cluster containing &#8805;2 ESTs is termed a contig and that containing only one sequence, a singleton.</p>
            <p>The unique putative gene sequences obtained by clustering and assembly were annotated by running BLAST <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B41">41</abbr></abbrgrp> against non-redundant (<it>nr</it>) protein database of NCBI. Further, BLAST output was parsed to classify the putative gene transcripts into different functional classes.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Analysis of unknown proteins</p>
            </st>
            <p>Proteins that did not show any significant hits in NCBI <it>nr </it>database or showed similarity to unknown or hypothetical proteins were characterized by additional computational tools.</p>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>a. Domain search</p>
               </st>
               <p>For the sequences showing high similarity to hypothetical and/or unknown proteins, and those showing weak similarity to <it>nr </it>protein database, domain search was performed using ProDom <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B42">42</abbr></abbrgrp>. Putative function was assigned based on the type of domains found.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>b. Signal peptide and transmembrane domain analysis</p>
               </st>
               <p>Presence of transmembrane domains and signal peptide analysis was done on the transcripts not showing any significant hits in NCBI database. The signal peptide analysis was done by SignalP software <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B43">43</abbr></abbrgrp> and trans-membrane domain analysis was done with TMHMM program <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B44">44</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>c. Functional annotation with PSI-BLAST</p>
               </st>
               <p>The functional annotation of four novel immune upregulated transcripts (DFPs) was done using PSI-BLAST <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Expression profile</p>
            </st>
            <p><it>A. mylitta </it>larvae were differentially challenged- a) Unchallenged, b) Saline-injected, c) <it>M. luteus </it>and d) <it>E. coli</it>. Log phase <it>E. coli </it>and <it>M. luteus </it>bacteria, washed and resuspended in insect saline (0.3 M NaCl, 0.005 M KCl) were injected (30 &#956;l) into a set of <it>A. mylitta </it>larvae. One set each of saline-injected and uninjected larvae were kept as a control. Four tissues, namely fat body, epidermis, mid gut, and silk gland were dissected out and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent. To remove genomic DNA contamination, total RNA was treated with RNAse free DNAse (NEB) as prescribed by the manufacturers. cDNA was synthesized using MMLV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and oligo dT primers from 1 &#956;g of total RNA. The primers were designed for the selected ESTs by Primer3 software <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B45">45</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>Semi-quantitative RT-PCR was carried out for all the four differentially challenged tissues using an Eppendorf master cycler under the following conditions- 94&#176;C, 2 min- initial denaturation, 27 cycles (94&#176;C &#8211; 30 s, 58&#176;C- 30s, 72&#176;C-2 mins) and a final elongation at 72&#176;C for 10 mins. Actin cDNA was amplified as an endogenous control. PCR reaction components included: 1X buffer, 100&#956;M dNTPs, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 units Taq polymerase (MBI), 0.5 &#956;M primers. Primer sequences are enlisted in additional data (see <supplr sid="S5">Additional data file 5</supplr>).</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Obtaining full-length cDNA by 5' RACE</p>
            </st>
            <p>We had obtained full-length coding sequences of the DFP-1, 2 and 3 through EST sequencing. To acquire full-length DFP-4 cDNA, we carried out 5' RACE PCR using the 5' RACE kit (Clontech). The 5' ends were amplified by using an adaptor primer and a reverse gene specific primer. PCR was performed for 25 cycles in an Eppendorf master cycler. A 300 bp band was isolated, sequenced and confirmed to be the 5' DFP-4 sequences.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Authors' contributions</p>
         </st>
         <p>AG and AKP conceived and designed the study, participated in the bioinformatics and validation analysis, and drafted the manuscript. SH carried out the expression profile analysis, assisted in the bioinformatics analysis and manuscript preparation. JN conceptualised the project, critically reviewed the manuscript and provided guidance. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <ack>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Acknowledgements</p>
            </st>
            <p>We acknowledge Ms Riti Mohapatra for her assistance in the bioinformatics analysis. We are thankful to Mr. Riccardo M. Bennett-Lovsey and Mr. Alex D. Herbert, graduate students, Imperial College, London, for their suggestions in annotating the unknown proteins. We also acknowledge Mr. Venkateswara Rao, Department of Sericulture, Andhra Pradesh, India for supplying <it>A. mylitta </it>larvae. JN acknowledges financial support from Department of Biotechnology, India. AG and AKP are recipients of the fellowship from University Grants Commission (UGC) and Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India respectively.</p>
         </sec>
      </ack>
      <refgrp>
         <bibl id="B1">
            <title>
               <p>Innate immune responses of a lepidopteran insect, Manduca sexta</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kanost</snm>
                  <fnm>MR</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jiang</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Yu</snm>
                  <fnm>XQ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Immunol Rev</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>198</volume>
            <fpage>97</fpage>
            <lpage>105</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0121.x</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15199957</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B2">
            <title>
               <p>The prophenoloxidase-activating system in invertebrates</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cerenius</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Soderhall</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Immunol Rev</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>198</volume>
            <fpage>116</fpage>
            <lpage>126</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00116.x</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15199959</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B3">
            <title>
               <p>Peptidoglycan recognition proteins: on and off switches for innate immunity</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Steiner</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Immunol Rev</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>198</volume>
            <fpage>83</fpage>
            <lpage>96</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0120.x</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15199956</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B4">
            <title>
               <p>Drosophila host defense after oral infection by an entomopathogenic Pseudomonas species</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Vodovar</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Vinals</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Liehl</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Basset</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Degrouard</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Spellman</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Boccard</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lemaitre</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>102</volume>
            <issue>32</issue>
            <fpage>11414</fpage>
            <lpage>11419</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1183552</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16061818</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.0502240102</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B5">
            <title>
               <p>Microarray analysis of immune challenged Drosophila hemocytes</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Johansson</snm>
                  <fnm>KC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Metzendorf</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Soderhall</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Exp Cell Res</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>305</volume>
            <issue>1</issue>
            <fpage>145</fpage>
            <lpage>155</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.12.018</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15777795</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B6">
            <title>
               <p>Transcriptome analysis of Anopheles stephensi-Plasmodium berghei interactions</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Xu</snm>
                  <fnm>X</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dong</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Abraham</snm>
                  <fnm>EG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kocan</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Srinivasan</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ghosh</snm>
                  <fnm>AK</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sinden</snm>
                  <fnm>RE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ribeiro</snm>
                  <fnm>JM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jacobs-Lorena</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kafatos</snm>
                  <fnm>FC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dimopoulos</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Mol Biochem Parasitol</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>142</volume>
            <issue>1</issue>
            <fpage>76</fpage>
            <lpage>87</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.molbiopara.2005.02.013</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15907562</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B7">
            <title>
               <p>Global gene expression analysis of Anopheles gambiae responses to microbial challenge</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Aguilar</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jedlicka</snm>
                  <fnm>AE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mintz</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mahairaki</snm>
                  <fnm>V</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Scott</snm>
                  <fnm>AL</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dimopoulos</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Insect Biochem Mol Biol</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>35</volume>
            <issue>7</issue>
            <fpage>709</fpage>
            <lpage>719</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.ibmb.2005.02.019</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15894188</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B8">
            <title>
               <p>Comparative expressed-sequence-tag analysis of differential gene expression profiles in BmNPV-infected BmN cells</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Okano</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Shimada</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mita</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Maeda</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Virology</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>282</volume>
            <issue>2</issue>
            <fpage>348</fpage>
            <lpage>356</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/viro.2001.0823</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11289817</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B9">
            <title>
               <p>Insect immunity. Attacins, a family of antibacterial proteins from Hyalophora cecropia</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hultmark</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Engstrom</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Andersson</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Steiner</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bennich</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Boman</snm>
                  <fnm>HG</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Embo J</source>
            <pubdate>1983</pubdate>
            <volume>2</volume>
            <issue>4</issue>
            <fpage>571</fpage>
            <lpage>576</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">555063</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">6628360</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B10">
            <title>
               <p>Identification by subtractive suppression hybridization of bacteria-induced genes expressed in Manduca sexta fat body</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zhu</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Johnson</snm>
                  <fnm>TJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Myers</snm>
                  <fnm>AA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kanost</snm>
                  <fnm>MR</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Insect Biochem Mol Biol</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>33</volume>
            <issue>5</issue>
            <fpage>541</fpage>
            <lpage>559</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0965-1748(03)00028-6</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12706633</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B11">
            <title>
               <p>SilkDB: a knowledgebase for silkworm biology and genomics</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wang</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Xia</snm>
                  <fnm>Q</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>He</snm>
                  <fnm>X</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dai</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ruan</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Chen</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Yu</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Yuan</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hu</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Li</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Feng</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ye</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lu</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wang</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Li</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wong</snm>
                  <fnm>GK</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Yang</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wang</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Xiang</snm>
                  <fnm>Z</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zhou</snm>
                  <fnm>Z</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Yu</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>33</volume>
            <issue>Database issue</issue>
            <fpage>D399</fpage>
            <lpage>402</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">540070</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15608225</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/nar/gki116</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B12">
            <title>
               <p>The genome sequence of silkworm, Bombyx mori</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mita</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kasahara</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sasaki</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nagayasu</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Yamada</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kanamori</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Namiki</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kitagawa</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Yamashita</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Yasukochi</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kadono-Okuda</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Yamamoto</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ajimura</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ravikumar</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Shimomura</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nagamura</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Shin</snm>
                  <fnm>IT</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Abe</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Shimada</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Morishita</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sasaki</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>DNA Res</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <issue>1</issue>
            <fpage>27</fpage>
            <lpage>35</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/dnares/11.1.27</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15141943</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B13">
            <title>
               <p>The construction of an EST database for Bombyx mori and its application</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mita</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Morimyo</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Okano</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Koike</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nohata</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kawasaki</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kadono-Okuda</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Yamamoto</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Suzuki</snm>
                  <fnm>MG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Shimada</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Goldsmith</snm>
                  <fnm>MR</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Maeda</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>100</volume>
            <issue>24</issue>
            <fpage>14121</fpage>
            <lpage>14126</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">283556</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14614147</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.2234984100</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B14">
            <title>
               <p>Structure of the induced antibacterial protein from tasar silkworm, Antheraea mylitta. Implications to molecular evolution</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jain</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nair</snm>
                  <fnm>DT</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Swaminathan</snm>
                  <fnm>GJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Abraham</snm>
                  <fnm>EG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nagaraju</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Salunke</snm>
                  <fnm>DM</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Biol Chem</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>276</volume>
            <issue>44</issue>
            <fpage>41377</fpage>
            <lpage>41382</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.M104674200</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11522783</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B15">
            <title>
               <p>Protein purification, cDNA cloning and characterization of a protease inhibitor from the Indian tasar silkworm, Antheraea mylitta</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Shrivastava</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ghosh</snm>
                  <fnm>AK</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Insect Biochem Mol Biol</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>33</volume>
            <issue>10</issue>
            <fpage>1025</fpage>
            <lpage>1033</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0965-1748(03)00117-6</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14505696</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B16">
            <title>
               <p>719 clusters of A. mylitta</p>
            </title>
            <publisher> [http://210.212.212.7:9999/PHP/SILKSAT/uniqueseqs/]</publisher>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B17">
            <title>
               <p>Parasite-specific immune response in adult Drosophila melanogaster: a genomic study</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Roxstrom-Lindquist</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Terenius</snm>
                  <fnm>O</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Faye</snm>
                  <fnm>I</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>EMBO Rep</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>5</volume>
            <issue>2</issue>
            <fpage>207</fpage>
            <lpage>212</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1298984</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14749722</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/sj.embor.7400073</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B18">
            <title>
               <p>A genome-wide analysis of immune responses in Drosophila</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Irving</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Troxler</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Heuer</snm>
                  <fnm>TS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Belvin</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kopczynski</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Reichhart</snm>
                  <fnm>JM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hoffmann</snm>
                  <fnm>JA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hetru</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>98</volume>
            <issue>26</issue>
            <fpage>15119</fpage>
            <lpage>15124</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">64993</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11742098</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.261573998</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B19">
            <title>
               <p>The cecropin locus. Cloning and expression of a gene cluster encoding three antibacterial peptides in Hyalophora cecropia</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gudmundsson</snm>
                  <fnm>GH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lidholm</snm>
                  <fnm>DA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Asling</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gan</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Boman</snm>
                  <fnm>HG</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Biol Chem</source>
            <pubdate>1991</pubdate>
            <volume>266</volume>
            <issue>18</issue>
            <fpage>11510</fpage>
            <lpage>11517</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">1711035</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B20">
            <title>
               <p>A pattern recognition protein for peptidoglycan. Cloning the cDNA and the gene of the silkworm, Bombyx mori</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ochiai</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ashida</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Biol Chem</source>
            <pubdate>1999</pubdate>
            <volume>274</volume>
            <issue>17</issue>
            <fpage>11854</fpage>
            <lpage>11858</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.274.17.11854</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10207004</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B21">
            <title>
               <p>Insect immunity. Purification and properties of three inducible bactericidal proteins from hemolymph of immunized pupae of Hyalophora cecropia</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hultmark</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Steiner</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rasmuson</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Boman</snm>
                  <fnm>HG</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Eur J Biochem</source>
            <pubdate>1980</pubdate>
            <volume>106</volume>
            <issue>1</issue>
            <fpage>7</fpage>
            <lpage>16</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">7341234</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B22">
            <title>
               <p>Structures, regulatory regions, and inductive expression patterns of antimicrobial peptide genes in the silkworm Bombyx mori</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cheng</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zhao</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Liu</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Xu</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gao</snm>
                  <fnm>Z</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Xia</snm>
                  <fnm>Q</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Xiang</snm>
                  <fnm>Z</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Genomics</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>87</volume>
            <issue>3</issue>
            <fpage>356</fpage>
            <lpage>365</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.11.018</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16406194</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B23">
            <title>
               <p>Identification of four small molecular mass proteins in the silk of Bombyx mori</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nirmala</snm>
                  <fnm>X</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mita</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Vanisree</snm>
                  <fnm>V</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zurovec</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sehnal</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Insect Mol Biol</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <issue>5</issue>
            <fpage>437</fpage>
            <lpage>445</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.0962-1075.2001.00282.x</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11881808</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B24">
            <title>
               <p>Cloning and expression of gallerimycin, an antifungal peptide expressed in immune response of greater wax moth larvae, Galleria mellonella</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Schuhmann</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Seitz</snm>
                  <fnm>V</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Vilcinskas</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Podsiadlowski</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Arch Insect Biochem Physiol</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>53</volume>
            <issue>3</issue>
            <fpage>125</fpage>
            <lpage>133</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/arch.10091</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12811766</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B25">
            <title>
               <p>The immune response of Drosophila</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hoffmann</snm>
                  <fnm>JA</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Nature</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>426</volume>
            <issue>6962</issue>
            <fpage>33</fpage>
            <lpage>38</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nature02021</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14603309</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B26">
            <title>
               <p>Hemolin: an insect-immune protein belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sun</snm>
                  <fnm>SC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lindstrom</snm>
                  <fnm>I</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Boman</snm>
                  <fnm>HG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Faye</snm>
                  <fnm>I</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Schmidt</snm>
                  <fnm>O</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Science</source>
            <pubdate>1990</pubdate>
            <volume>250</volume>
            <issue>4988</issue>
            <fpage>1729</fpage>
            <lpage>1732</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">2270488</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B27">
            <title>
               <p>Peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs)</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dziarski</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Mol Immunol</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>40</volume>
            <issue>12</issue>
            <fpage>877</fpage>
            <lpage>886</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.molimm.2003.10.011</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14698226</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B28">
            <title>
               <p>Extensive diversity of Ig-superfamily proteins in the immune system of insects</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Watson</snm>
                  <fnm>FL</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Puttmann-Holgado</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Thomas</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lamar</snm>
                  <fnm>DL</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hughes</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kondo</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rebel</snm>
                  <fnm>VI</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Schmucker</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Science</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>309</volume>
            <issue>5742</issue>
            <fpage>1874</fpage>
            <lpage>1878</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.1116887</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16109846</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B29">
            <title>
               <p>AgDscam, a Hypervariable Immunoglobulin Domain-Containing Receptor of theAnopheles gambiae Innate Immune System</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dong</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Taylor</snm>
                  <fnm>HE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dimopoulos</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>PLoS Biol</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>4</volume>
            <issue>7</issue>
            <fpage>e229</fpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1479700</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16774454</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1371/journal.pbio.0040229</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B30">
            <title>
               <p>A catalog for the transcripts from the venomous structures of the caterpillar Lonomia obliqua: identification of the proteins potentially involved in the coagulation disorder and hemorrhagic syndrome</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Veiga</snm>
                  <fnm>AB</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ribeiro</snm>
                  <fnm>JM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Guimaraes</snm>
                  <fnm>JA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Francischetti</snm>
                  <fnm>IM</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Gene</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>355</volume>
            <fpage>11</fpage>
            <lpage>27</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.gene.2005.05.002</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16023793</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B31">
            <title>
               <p>Isolation and characterization of immune-related genes from the fall webworm, Hyphantria cunea, using PCR-based differential display and subtractive cloning</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Shin</snm>
                  <fnm>SW</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Park</snm>
                  <fnm>SS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Park</snm>
                  <fnm>DS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kim</snm>
                  <fnm>MG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kim</snm>
                  <fnm>SC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Brey</snm>
                  <fnm>PT</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Park</snm>
                  <fnm>HY</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Insect Biochem Mol Biol</source>
            <pubdate>1998</pubdate>
            <volume>28</volume>
            <issue>11</issue>
            <fpage>827</fpage>
            <lpage>837</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0965-1748(98)00077-0</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9818384</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B32">
            <title>
               <p>cDNA cloning and expression of bacteria-induced Hdd11 gene from eri-silkworm, Samia cynthia ricini</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bao</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mega</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Yamano</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Morishima</snm>
                  <fnm>I</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>136</volume>
            <issue>4</issue>
            <fpage>337</fpage>
            <lpage>342</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.cca.2003.10.007</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15012905</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B33">
            <title>
               <p>Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Altschul</snm>
                  <fnm>SF</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Madden</snm>
                  <fnm>TL</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Schaffer</snm>
                  <fnm>AA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zhang</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zhang</snm>
                  <fnm>Z</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Miller</snm>
                  <fnm>W</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lipman</snm>
                  <fnm>DJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>
            <pubdate>1997</pubdate>
            <volume>25</volume>
            <issue>17</issue>
            <fpage>3389</fpage>
            <lpage>3402</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">146917</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9254694</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/nar/25.17.3389</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B34">
            <title>
               <p>The extracellular matrix protein mindin is a pattern-recognition molecule for microbial pathogens</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>He</snm>
                  <fnm>YW</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Li</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zhang</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hsu</snm>
                  <fnm>CL</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lin</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zhang</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Guo</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Forbush</snm>
                  <fnm>KA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bevan</snm>
                  <fnm>MJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Nat Immunol</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>5</volume>
            <issue>1</issue>
            <fpage>88</fpage>
            <lpage>97</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/ni1021</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14691481</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B35">
            <title>
               <p>Janus kinase 2 is involved in stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion proteins and migration of hematopoietic progenitor cells</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zhang</snm>
                  <fnm>XF</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wang</snm>
                  <fnm>JF</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Matczak</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Proper</snm>
                  <fnm>JA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Groopman</snm>
                  <fnm>JE</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Blood</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>97</volume>
            <issue>11</issue>
            <fpage>3342</fpage>
            <lpage>3348</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1182/blood.V97.11.3342</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11369622</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B36">
            <title>
               <p>Genome-wide analysis of the Drosophila immune response by using oligonucleotide microarrays</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>De Gregorio</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Spellman</snm>
                  <fnm>PT</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rubin</snm>
                  <fnm>GM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lemaitre</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>98</volume>
            <issue>22</issue>
            <fpage>12590</fpage>
            <lpage>12595</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">60098</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11606746</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.221458698</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B37">
            <title>
               <p>Differential activation of the NF-kappaB-like factors Relish and Dif in Drosophila melanogaster by fungi and Gram-positive bacteria</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hedengren-Olcott</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Olcott</snm>
                  <fnm>MC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mooney</snm>
                  <fnm>DT</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ekengren</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Geller</snm>
                  <fnm>BL</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Taylor</snm>
                  <fnm>BJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Biol Chem</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>279</volume>
            <issue>20</issue>
            <fpage>21121</fpage>
            <lpage>21127</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.M313856200</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14985331</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B38">
            <title>
               <p>Purification and partial characterization of an induced antibacterial protein in the silkworm, Bombyx mori</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Abraham</snm>
                  <fnm>EG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nagaraju</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Salunke</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gupta</snm>
                  <fnm>HM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Datta</snm>
                  <fnm>RK</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Invertebr Pathol</source>
            <pubdate>1995</pubdate>
            <volume>65</volume>
            <issue>1</issue>
            <fpage>17</fpage>
            <lpage>24</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/jipa.1995.1003</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">7876591</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B39">
            <title>
               <p>Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ewing</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Green</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Genome Res</source>
            <pubdate>1998</pubdate>
            <volume>8</volume>
            <issue>3</issue>
            <fpage>186</fpage>
            <lpage>194</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9521922</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B40">
            <title>
               <p>The TGICL program </p>
            </title>
            <publisher> [www.tigr.org]</publisher>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B41">
            <title>
               <p>Basic local alignment search tool</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Altschul</snm>
                  <fnm>SF</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gish</snm>
                  <fnm>W</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Miller</snm>
                  <fnm>W</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Myers</snm>
                  <fnm>EW</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lipman</snm>
                  <fnm>DJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Mol Biol</source>
            <pubdate>1990</pubdate>
            <volume>215</volume>
            <issue>3</issue>
            <fpage>403</fpage>
            <lpage>410</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">2231712</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B42">
            <title>
               <p>The ProDom database of protein domain families: more emphasis on 3D</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bru</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Courcelle</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Carrere</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Beausse</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dalmar</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kahn</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>33</volume>
            <issue>Database issue</issue>
            <fpage>D212</fpage>
            <lpage>5</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">539988</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15608179</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/nar/gki034</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B43">
            <title>
               <p>SignalP software</p>
            </title>
            <publisher> [http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/]</publisher>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B44">
            <title>
               <p>TMHMM program</p>
            </title>
            <publisher> http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM-2.0/</publisher>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B45">
            <title>
               <p>Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rozen</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Skaletsky</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Methods Mol Biol</source>
            <pubdate>2000</pubdate>
            <volume>132</volume>
            <fpage>365</fpage>
            <lpage>386</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">10547847</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
      </refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>
