<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
	<ui>1471-2148-7-130</ui>
	<ji>1471-2148</ji>
	<fm>
		<dochead>Research article</dochead>
		<bibl>
			<title>
				<p>An ancient genome duplication contributed to the abundance of metabolic genes in the moss <it>Physcomitrella patens</it></p>
			</title>
			<aug>
				<au id="A1" ca="yes">
					<snm>Rensing</snm>
					<mi>A</mi>
					<fnm>Stefan</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<email>stefan.rensing@biologie.uni-freiburg.de</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A2">
					<snm>Ick</snm>
					<fnm>Julia</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<email>julia.ick@biologie.uni-freiburg.de</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A3">
					<snm>Fawcett</snm>
					<mi>A</mi>
					<fnm>Jeffrey</fnm>
					<insr iid="I2"/>
					<insr iid="I3"/>
					<email>jefaw@psb.ugent.be</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A4">
					<snm>Lang</snm>
					<fnm>Daniel</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<email>daniel.lang@biologie.uni-freiburg.de</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A5">
					<snm>Zimmer</snm>
					<fnm>Andreas</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<email>andreas.zimmer@biologie.uni-freiburg.de</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A6">
					<snm>Van de Peer</snm>
					<fnm>Yves</fnm>
					<insr iid="I2"/>
					<insr iid="I3"/>
					<email>yvpee@psb.ugent.be</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A7">
					<snm>Reski</snm>
					<fnm>Ralf</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<email>ralf.reski@biologie.uni-freiburg.de</email>
				</au>
			</aug>
			<insg>
				<ins id="I1">
					<p>Plant Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Schaenzlestr. 1, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany.</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I2">
					<p>Department of Plant Systems Biology, VIB, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I3">
					<p>Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Genomics, Department of Molecular Genetics, Ghent University, Technologiepark 927, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.</p>
				</ins>
			</insg>
			<source>BMC Evolutionary Biology</source>
			<issn>1471-2148</issn>
			<pubdate>2007</pubdate>
			<volume>7</volume>
			<issue>1</issue>
			<fpage>130</fpage>
			<url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/7/130</url>
			<xrefbib>
				<pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmpid">17683536</pubid><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2148-7-130</pubid>
				</pubidlist></xrefbib>
		</bibl>
		<history>
			<rec>
				<date>
					<day>25</day>
					<month>4</month>
					<year>2007</year>
				</date>
			</rec>
			<acc>
				<date>
					<day>02</day>
					<month>8</month>
					<year>2007</year>
				</date>
			</acc>
			<pub>
				<date>
					<day>02</day>
					<month>8</month>
					<year>2007</year>
				</date>
			</pub>
		</history>
		<cpyrt>
			<year>2007</year>
			<collab>Rensing et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab>
			<note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note>
		</cpyrt>
		<abs>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Abstract</p>
				</st>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Background:</p>
					</st>
					<p>Analyses of complete genomes and large collections of gene transcripts have shown that most, if not all seed plants have undergone one or more genome duplications in their evolutionary past.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Results:</p>
					</st>
					<p>In this study, based on a large collection of EST sequences, we provide evidence that the haploid moss <it>Physcomitrella patens </it>is a paleopolyploid as well. Based on the construction of linearized phylogenetic trees we infer the genome duplication to have occurred between 30 and 60 million years ago. Gene Ontology and pathway association of the duplicated genes in <it>P. patens </it>reveal different biases of gene retention compared with seed plants.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Conclusion:</p>
					</st>
					<p>Metabolic genes seem to have been retained in excess following the genome duplication in <it>P. patens</it>. This might, at least partly, explain the versatility of metabolism, as described for <it>P. patens </it>and other mosses, in comparison to other land plants.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
		</abs>
	</fm>
	<meta>
		<classifications>
			<classification type="bmc" subtype="user_supplied_xml" id="endnote"/>
		</classifications>
	</meta>
	<bdy>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Background</p>
			</st>
			<p>In contrast to animals, the entire multicellular diploid generation of plants (along with the cuticle and thick-walled, non-motile spores) probably evolved after the transition to land <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp>. All land plants display alternating multicellular generations &#8211; the sexual, haploid gametophyte and the asexual, diploid sporophyte. In early land plant fossils the gametophytic and sporophytic generation share about equal morphological complexity, making it likely that the gametophyte was reduced and the sporophyte became the dominant generation in vascular plants <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp> while in &#8220;bryophytes&#8221; (mosses, hornworts and liverworts) the sporophyte generation was reduced and the gametophyte became dominant. Thus, &#8220;bryophytes&#8221; in comparison with vascular plants enable inference of early states of land plant evolution. Based upon spores found in the fossil record, the first plants had occupied the land in the Middle Ordovician, approximately 460 million years ago (MYA) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>. The first splits among the <it>Embryophyta </it>separated the <it>Bryopsida </it>(mosses), <it>Antocerotophyta </it>(hornworts) and <it>Marchantiophyta </it>(liverworts) from the remainder of the land plants, the vascular plants. The oldest liverwort fossils are from the Late Devonian, ~360 MYA, the oldest mosses to be found in the fossil record are from the Permian, ~270 MYA <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp>. The first deposits containing remnants of modern mosses are from the Jurassic and Cretaceous; based on these fossils some extant species exhibited only limited morphological change in the past 80 MY <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp>. Most of the mosses deposited in European Miocene (24 MYA) are morphologically identical to extant European genera and even species <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp>. Mosses embedded in Caribbean amber (20&#8211;45 MYA) could also be traced to a large extent to extant genera and species <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr></abbrgrp>. In summary, some moss species might be 40&#8211;80 MY old, whereas some genera might even be 80&#8211;100 MY old <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp>, which is also seconded by recent phylogenetic analyses <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
			<p>Gene and genome duplications are a driving force of eukaryotic evolution <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr></abbrgrp>. Angiosperms (flowering plants) are paleopolyploids, i.e. the genome of their common ancestor was subject to a large-scale or even genome-wide duplication event during the Late Jurassic or Early Cretaceous, 100&#8211;160 MYA <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr></abbrgrp>. This duplication event might have triggered the angiosperm radiation during the Late Cretaceous, which is apparent in the fossil record <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp>. There is evidence for several more large-scale or genome-wide duplication events among the angiosperms. The core eudicots apparently duplicated their genome in the Late Cretaceous, while the common ancestor of the <it>Brassicales </it>did so again in the Cenozoic <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>. Also poplar, of which the genome sequence has been determined recently, has undergone an additional genome duplication event ~60 MYA, independent of the one in the <it>Brassicales </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr></abbrgrp>. Recently, paleopolyploidy has been suggested for several basal angiosperm species as well as for some gymnosperms <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp>. Interestingly, the retention of genes after such large-scale duplication events has been shown to be biased towards certain functional classes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp> and it has been argued that such biased retention of duplicated genes has been a driving force for morphological complexity, increase in biological diversity and eukaryote adaptive radiation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
			<p>The aims of the current study were: (i) to reveal molecular evidence for genome duplications in non-seed plants, in particular in the moss <it>Physcomitrella patens</it>, (ii) to date the duplication event(s), and (iii) to study the possible evolutionary consequences by analyzing the retention of different functional classes of genes.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Results and discussion</p>
			</st>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p><it>Physcomitrella patens </it>is a paleopolyploid</p>
				</st>
				<p>Based upon a dataset of 24,845 <it>P. patens </it>unigenes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr></abbrgrp>, prediction of open reading frames using species-specific models yielded a dataset of 22,237 coding sequences. From those, a total of 2,907 paralogs were determined by all-against-all BLAST searches using previously described parameters <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>. After average linkage clustering, the K<sub>S</sub>-values representing ancient duplication events were calculated. In total, 1,971 genes were placed in 854 clusters. A cutoff distance of K<sub>S </sub>5.0 was used and the K<sub>S</sub>-range was divided into bins of size 0.1. The K<sub>S </sub>age distribution plot exhibits a clearly distinguishable peak at K<sub>S </sub>~0.85, providing evidence for an ancient large-scale or even genome-wide duplication event (Figure <figr fid="F1">1A</figr>). While K<sub>S </sub>values &gt;1.0 should be used with caution because multiple mutations may cause inaccuracies in the estimation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr></abbrgrp>, the K<sub>S </sub>estimate for the peak in the <it>P. patens </it>distribution thus probably is trustworthy. Also, while e.g. in <it>Drosophila </it>K<sub>S </sub>is lower in genes with strong codon bias, this is not the case for <it>P. patens </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B28">28</abbr></abbrgrp> and thus needs not to be dealed with.</p>
				<fig id="F1">
					<title>
						<p>Figure 1</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Dating the genome duplication event in <it>Physcomitrella patens</it></p>
					</caption>
					<text>
						<p><b>Dating the genome duplication event in <it>Physcomitrella patens</it></b>. a) Age distribution of paralogous EST sequences. The height of the bars reflects the amount of gene pairs in the respective bin relative to the total amount of K<sub>S </sub>values in the distribution. b) Age distribution of duplicated genes as inferred from their point of divergence relative to the split <it>Arabidopsis</it>-poplar or <it>Arabidopsis</it>/poplar-rice in a phylogenetic tree as shown in c). The split between <it>Arabidopsis </it>and poplar is assumed to have occurred at about 100 MYA, while the split between monocots and eudicots is assumed to have occurred at about 150 MYA.</p>
					</text>
					<graphic file="1471-2148-7-130-1"/>
				</fig>
				<p>In order to obtain additional evidence for a large-scale or genome-wide duplication in <it>P. patens</it>, as well as to date this duplication event, we constructed linearized trees (see Methods). We constructed neighbor-joining trees for 487 gene families which contained two to ten <it>P. patens </it>genes, one <it>Chlamydomonas reinhardtii </it>or <it>Ostreococcus tauri </it>gene as an outgroup sequence, and genes from at least two different seed plants (<it>Arabidopsis thaliana</it>, poplar, or rice) as reference points. Sequences that were evolving too fast or too slow were removed, after which linearized trees, in which branch lengths are directly proportional to time, were constructed for each gene family <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr></abbrgrp>. This left 330 trees, and after removing nodes with bootstrap values &lt; 70%, we obtained 179 nodes representing the duplication events of <it>P. patens </it>in 159 trees that could be used for dating the gene duplications in <it>P. patens </it>by comparing the time of duplication with the time of speciation between <it>A. thaliana </it>and poplar, assumed 100 MYA <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr></abbrgrp> and <it>A. thaliana </it>or poplar and rice, assumed 150 MYA <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr></abbrgrp> (see Figure <figr fid="F1">1B</figr>).</p>
				<p>Next, we plotted the estimated dates of the 179 <it>P. patens </it>duplication events, which are shown in Figure <figr fid="F1">1C</figr>. As can be clearly observed, a majority of the gene duplicates seem to have been created between 30&#8211;60 MYA (average 45 MYA), indicating that a large-scale gene duplication or a whole-genome duplication is indeed likely to have occurred around this time. Although using two different calibration dates (100 MYA for the <it>Arabidopsis</it>-poplar split, and 150 MYA for the monocot-eudicot split) may affect the age distribution if one of the two calibration dates is unrealistic compared to the other, age distributions obtained for each calibration point separately were very similar (data not shown), suggesting that the dates of 100 MYA and 150 MYA <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr></abbrgrp> are in good agreement with inferred dates from tree topologies.</p>
				<p>It should be noted, however, that a number of alternative and more sophisticated methods exist to estimate divergence or duplication dates based on tree inference, even if rate heterogeneity between lineages is present. Yet, as has been shown in several studies (e.g. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr></abbrgrp> and references therein), caution should be taken when using such rate-smoothing methods. It is also much harder to process a large amount of data in a high-throughput manner using rate-smoothing methods because of the different parameters that ideally have to be estimated or used for different genes or proteins, while this is not the case when a correction for unequal rates is not required and faster/slower evolving genes are simply removed, as in the linearized trees method applied here. The major disadvantage of the linearized tree method is that a substantial amount of data is omitted from the analysis because trees showing unequal branch lengths for the species under investigation are not considered. However, in the current study there are plenty of data left to provide convincing evidence that a large-scale gene duplication event has occurred in the evolutionary past of <it>P. patens</it>. This was the main aim of our study, rather than to come up with the most accurate dating of that event, which will be very difficult anyway given the fact that the calibration points are debateable in the first place.</p>
				<p>However, the approximate range of the duplication event is probably trustworthy. If we assume that the genome duplication indeed took place about 45 MYA (average of the peak in Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>), and we assume that genes duplicated at that time have an average K<sub>S </sub>value of 0.85 (see Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>), we can infer the rate of synonymous substitutions by simply dividing 0.85 by 45 MY. This gives us a rate of 1.9 synonymous substitutions per synonymous site per year, which is very close to the value presented by Koch et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr></abbrgrp> based on the calibration of molecular clocks for eudicots. However, these substitution rates have to be interpreted with caution, since there are many theoretical and empirical concerns about the accuracy of molecular clocks and the rate of substitutions in different lineages. Some of the major issues are rate heterogeneity in and between lineages caused by evolutionary factors (e.g. generation time), difficulties in interpreting the fossil data used to calibrate the clock, and rate variation among genes, even at synonymous sites.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>An enigma unveiled: ploidy levels and chromosome counts among mosses</p>
				</st>
				<p>Besides the long-term effect of increasing the genetic complexity, there might be several possible short-term advantages of polyploidization events for diploid seed plants (reviewed by <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr></abbrgrp>), such as heterosis effect, sympatric and allopatric speciation, decreased inbreeding depression and genetic load (allowing selfing populations that can be monoecious and better dispersers). Genome duplication, due to its effects on gene regulation and developmental processes, might also be a foundation for speciation and adaptation through genetic divergence in plants <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr></abbrgrp>. In the case of the haploid &#8220;bryophytes&#8221;, however, other effects appear more relevant. The allopolyploidization of dioecious gametophytes might yield a monoecious plant (thus rendering the dispersal of breeding populations easier). A second advantage might be that the duplication of the genome would free the formerly haploid plant from the necessity to preserve the function of crucial single copy genes under all circumstances, thus enhancing the potential for development of new functions. The moss <it>P. patens </it>belongs to the <it>Funariaceae</it>, is haploid, monoecious and self-fertile. Polyploidization occurs rather frequently during transfection of <it>P. patens </it>protoplasts <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B36">36</abbr></abbrgrp>. Among transformants, diploid plants cannot be distinguished from haploid plants using morphological traits alone <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B37">37</abbr></abbrgrp>. The <it>P. patens </it>wild type, however, is clearly functionally haploid, as can be seen from segregation ratios <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B38">38</abbr></abbrgrp>. Taken together, our data suggest that the ancestor of <it>P. patens </it>underwent polyploidization during the Eocene, potentially becoming hermaphroditic through this process. However, subsequently the plant became functionally haploid again (haploidization) while keeping the duplicated chromosomes. Analogous states are known from seed plants as well, where duplicated chromosomes often remain after allopolyploidization and subsequent diploidization <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr><abbr bid="B40">40</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
				<p>Most liverworts have 9 chromosomes and hornworts usually have 8, 9 or 10; there are few polyploids in both groups. The mosses, in contrast, display chromosome numbers between 4 and 72 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B41">41</abbr></abbrgrp>. These are probably due to both different base numbers in the different orders and the existence of many aneuploids and polyploids <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp>. Within the <it>Funariaceae</it>, chromosome counts between 4 and 72 have been reported <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B41">41</abbr></abbrgrp>. While <it>Funaria hygrometrica </it>seems to be representative for the majority of <it>Funariaceae</it>, <it>Physcomitrium pyriforme </it>usually exhibits a higher chromosome count with several samples each being described to contain 18, 26, 36, 52 and 54 haploid chromosomes, with the highest number being 72 chromosomes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B41">41</abbr></abbrgrp>. Among the analysed <it>F. hygrometrica </it>accessions, 51% contain 28 chromosomes. While single accessions were described to contain 4, 21 and 42 chromosomes, the remainder contains either 14 (34%) or 56 (9%) chromosomes. In the case of <it>P. patens</it>, chromosome counts of 14 and 28 have been reported for two different isolates <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B42">42</abbr></abbrgrp>. These data make frequent, recent and independent polyploidization events among individual species or genera evident. The haploid chromosome count of the <it>P. patens </it>ecotype analysed here is 27 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B43">43</abbr></abbrgrp>, which, given the data presented in this work, would make it a putative paleopolyploid and paleoaneuploid. In a recent phylogenetic analysis, the age of the <it>Funariales </it>was determined at ~172 MYA <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>. Therefore, the whole genome duplication analysed here most probably represents a duplication event that occurred after speciation among the <it>Funariaceae</it>. Consequently, the different chromosome counts found in extant species like <it>P. patens</it>, <it>F. hygrometrica </it>and <it>P. pyriforme </it>have most probably occurred and been fixed several times independently during evolution. This is further supported by the fact that moss genera or species seem to have become hermaphroditic several times independently during evolution, given the dissipated pattern of mon- and dioecious species within the taxonomic groups <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Gene retention following the whole genome duplication in <it>P. patens</it></p>
				</st>
				<p>It has been demonstrated that retention of functional gene classes after large-scale duplication events is biased in angiosperms. For example, genes involved in signal transduction and transcriptional regulation were preferentially retained after the three whole genome duplication events within the ancestor of <it>A. thaliana</it>, while there was selection against retention of these genes after small-scale duplication events <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp>. In order to analyse potential bias among the genes that were retained following the genome duplication in <it>Physcomitrella patens</it>, we compared the fractions of genes associated with Gene Ontology (GO) terms <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B44">44</abbr></abbrgrp>. All paralogs with a K<sub>S </sub>of 0.6&#8211;1.1 (765 genes) were mapped to GO Slim <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B45">45</abbr></abbrgrp> and compared to the associations of an equally sized random sample. The biological process categories "biosynthesis" and "generation of precursor metabolites and energy" are significantly over-represented (q &lt; 0.05) among the retained paralogs (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). In total, 199 genes, (26%) belong to these categories. Genes of biological process categories that are under-represented within the genome duplication peak are "protein biosynthesis", "organelle organization and biogenesis", "cytoskeleton organization and biogenesis" and "cytoplasm organization and biogenesis". Genes involved in signal transduction and transcriptional regulation, which were preferentially retained after genome duplications in angiosperms <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr><abbr bid="B46">46</abbr></abbrgrp>, seem not to be retained in excess following the duplication event in <it>P. patens</it>. Also, the PFAM domains that were reported to be enriched in plant (<it>A. thaliana </it>and rice) duplicate genes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B47">47</abbr></abbrgrp> were compared with those assigned to genes present in the <it>P. patens </it>K<sub>S </sub>peak and were found not to be enriched.</p>
				<tbl id="T1">
					<title>
						<p>Table 1</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Over- and under-represented GO categories among genes retained after the <it>P. patens </it>genome duplication</p>
					</caption>
					<tblbdy cols="5">
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>GO category/KO pathway</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>description</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<b>No. of annotated genes in the peak</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<b>No. of annotated genes in the reference set</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<b>fdr corrected p-value</b>
								</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c cspan="5">
								<hr/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>enriched</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0006091</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>generation of precursor metabolites and energy</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>80</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>35</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.0029</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0009058</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>biosynthesis</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>119</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>67</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.0109</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>reduced</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0006412</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>protein biosynthesis</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>54</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>82</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.0424</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0006996</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>organelle organization and biogenesis</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>28</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>67</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.0005</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0007010</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>cytoskeleton organization and biogenesis</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>3</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>19</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.0059</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0007028</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>cytoplasm organization and biogenesis</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>27</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>62</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.0010</p>
							</c>
						</r>
					</tblbdy>
				</tbl>
				<p>The genes present in the peak (Figure <figr fid="F1">1A</figr>) representing the whole genome duplication were also mapped against the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database in order to analyse in which pathways they are involved. Among the genes that belong to the under-represented GO categories, the lack of ribosomal proteins (48% of those present in the reference set) is noteworthy. The genes belonging to the enriched GO categories all belong to the KEGG ontology (KO) class "metabolism". Among GO:0006091 "generation of precursor metabolites and energy", the major KO pathways are energy and carbohydrate metabolism, among GO:0009058 "biosynthesis", the major KO pathways are carbohydrate, amino acid and lipid metabolism. Thus, both GO and KEGG analyses demonstrate an abundance of genes involved in metabolism that were specifically retained following the whole genome duplication. This is in concordance with the high abundance of metabolic genes in <it>P. patens </it>as compared to seed plants which has been described previously <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp>. Based on GO mappings of large-scale genome or transcriptome datasets, metabolism-associated transcripts account for 10&#8211;44% of seed plant transcriptomes, while their abundance is significantly higher (70&#8211;80%) in mosses <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp>. Apparently, metabolic genes have been maintained in excess following the large-scale duplication event, which might explain their previously observed abundance in the <it>P. patens </it>genome.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Peculiarities of moss ecology and metabolism</p>
				</st>
				<p>There are species of mosses that can survive long times of dryness (up to 14 years), extreme cold (Antarctica) and heat (70 to 110 degrees Celsius) and are able to prosper in only 0.1% of sun light (while seed plants need at least 2%). In general, mosses are adapted to capture of low light intensities, having low light compensation and saturation points, making use of their one-cell-thick leaflets and lack of waxy cuticles <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B48">48</abbr></abbrgrp>. The structural simplicity of the tissues permits mosses to react immediately to water, CO<sub>2 </sub>and light availability in terms of photosynthesis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B48">48</abbr></abbrgrp>. Mosses in general are able to grow over a wider temperature range than seed plants, particularly at low temperatures. Many mosses are able to have photosynthetic gain at temperatures as low as -10&#176;C <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B48">48</abbr></abbrgrp>. They typically become dormant in summer heat and drought but are able to immediately photosynthesize upon rehydration. Mosses are able to receive nutrients from the substrate as well as from precipitation and dust <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B48">48</abbr></abbrgrp>. In a multitude of studies, alternative and/or redundant metabolic pathways have been described in mosses. As an example, the reduction of adenosine 5'-phosphosulfate (APS) to sulfite by adenosine 5'-phosphosulfate reductase is considered the key step of sulfate assimilation in seed plants. While APS-reductase is present in <it>P. patens </it>as well, this moss also harbors a phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate (PAPS) reductase, which was previously known e.g. from enteric bacteria <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B49">49</abbr></abbrgrp>. Thus, <it>P. patens </it>is able to employ an alternative pathway of sulfate reduction that is not accessible to seed plants. Interestingly, sulfate adenylyltransferase, the enzyme that catalyzes the formation of PAPS from ATP and inorganic sulfate, is encoded by a gene present in the K<sub>S </sub>peak. In <it>Ceratodon purpureus</it>. a bifunctional delta-fatty acyl acetylenase/desaturase has been characterized which displays a redundant functionality, being able to introduce a Delta6cis-double bond into 9,12,(15)-C18-polyenoic acids as well as converting a Delta6cis-double bond to a Delta6-triple bond <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B50">50</abbr></abbrgrp>. <it>P. patens </it>contains a homolog of the yeast ELO-genes unknown from seed plants, encoding a component of the Delta6-elongase, which is involved in the biosynthesis of C20 polyunsaturated fatty acids <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B51">51</abbr></abbrgrp>. Among the proteins encoded by the K<sub>S </sub>peak genes, 12 are involved in fatty acid metabolism (e.g., fatty acid desaturase, long-chain fatty-acid-CoA ligase), of which eight are involved in fatty acid biosynthesis.</p>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Lipid metabolism and volatiles</p>
					</st>
					<p>The tetracyclic diterpene 16alpha-hydroxykaurane is a major lipid compound in <it>P. patens</it>, which has been shown to be released into the air <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B52">52</abbr></abbrgrp>. <it>P. patens </it>contains high levels of arachidonic acid and lesser amounts of eicosapentaenoic acid, which is due to delta5- and delta6-desaturases that are associated with the synthesis of these fatty acids <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B53">53</abbr><abbr bid="B54">54</abbr></abbrgrp>. A complex mixture of fatty acid-derived aldehydes, ketones, and alcohols is released upon wounding of <it>P. patens</it>. In contrast to other lipoxygenases cloned so far, the <it>P. patens </it>enzyme exhibits an unusually high hydroperoxidase and fatty acid chain-cleaving lyase activity, leading to the formation of unusual oxylipins based on arachidonic acid as substrate <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B55">55</abbr></abbrgrp>. Thus, a highly diverse product spectrum is formed by a single enzyme accounting for most of the observed oxylipins produced by <it>P. patens</it>. Also, a <it>P. patens </it>gene was cloned and classified to encode an unspecific hydroperoxide lyase having a substrate preference for 9-hydroperoxides of C18-fatty acids <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B56">56</abbr></abbrgrp>. The knockout lines failed to emit (2E)-nonenal while formation of C8-volatiles was not affected, indicating that in contrast to flowering plants the <it>P. patens </it>enzyme is involved in formation of a specific subset of volatiles. Ent-kaurene is a precursor for gibberellins (GAs) in plants and fungi. The fungal CPS/KS enzyme catalyzes a two-step reaction corresponding to ent-copalyl diphosphate synthase (CPS) and ent-kaurene synthase (KS) activity in plants. Overexpression of fungal CPS/KS in <it>A. thaliana </it>has been shown to rescue GA-deficient phenotypes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B57">57</abbr></abbrgrp>. Interestingly, the over-expressing plants emitted ent-kaurene as a volatile, inducing airborne action on nearby plants. Recently, an ent-kaurene synthase from <it>P. patens </it>was cloned and characterized. The enzyme is a bifunctional cyclase which, like fungal CPS/KS, directly synthesizes ent-kaurene from geranylgeranyl diphosphate <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B58">58</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Tolerance to abiotic stresses</p>
					</st>
					<p>In comparison with seed plants, <it>Physcomitrella patens </it>exhibits a much greater tolerance to abiotic stresses, being able to survive e.g. NaCl concentrations up to 350 mM and sorbitol up to 500 mM <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B59">59</abbr></abbrgrp>. <it>P. patens </it>is dehydration tolerant, plants that had lost 92% water on a fresh-weight basis were able to recover successfully <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B59">59</abbr></abbrgrp>. Other mosses, like <it>Tortula ruralis</it>, are even desiccation tolerant, the rehydrating gametophytes displaying an abundance of transcripts that code for e.g. enzymes involved in oxidative stress metabolism <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B60">60</abbr></abbrgrp>. The transcript levels of novel putative membrane transporters similar to mammalian inward rectifier potassium channels were shown to be upregulated in <it>P. patens </it>upon cold and osmotic stress <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B61">61</abbr></abbrgrp>. The widespread calcifuge moss <it>Pleurozium schreberi </it>is moderately tolerant to dissolved SO<sub>2 </sub>(bisulfite). The tolerance mechanism involves extracellular oxidation using metabolic (photo-oxidative) energy, passive oxidation by adsorbed Fe<sup>3+ </sup>and probably also internal metabolic detoxification <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B62">62</abbr></abbrgrp>. In a comparative classification of alpine mosses, lichens and seed plants, strong illumination caused photodamage in dried leaves, but not in dry moss (<it>Grimmia alpestris</it>) and dry lichens <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B63">63</abbr></abbrgrp>. In hydrated mosses, but not in leaves of seed plants, protein protonation and zeaxanthin availability are fully sufficient for effective energy dissipation even when photosystem II reaction centers are open <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B64">64</abbr></abbrgrp>. During desiccation, quenchers accumulate in the poikilohydric moss <it>Rhytidiadelphus squarrosus </it>which are stable in the absence of water but revert to non-quenching molecular species on hydration <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B65">65</abbr></abbrgrp>. Together with zeaxanthin-dependent energy dissipation, desiccation-induced thermal energy dissipation protects desiccated poikilohydric mosses against photo-oxidation, ensuring survival during drought periods <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B65">65</abbr></abbrgrp>. There are several proteins encoded by K<sub>S </sub>peak genes that might be related to these phenomena, such as those involved in carotenoid synthesis (1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase, zeta-carotene desaturase, two phytoene synthases) and electron transfer (ten light-harvesting complex II chlorophyll a/b binding proteins, two plastocyanins and two cytochrome b6-f complex iron-sulfur subunits).</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Conclusion</p>
			</st>
			<p>It is remarkable that many alternative metabolic pathways exist in <it>P. patens </it>and other mosses while they are absent from seed plants. Some of the metabolites produced by these genes, such as volatile lipid compounds, might aid pathogen defence. As an opportunist growing on different types of soil, being able to prosper using a plethora of energy sources might suit <it>P. patens </it>well. Drought tolerance is a primordial trait which is especially important for mosses, because they generally do not possess an epidermis or a sturdy cuticula. The biased retention of genes involved in transcriptional regulation and signal transduction in angiosperms, resulting in highly adapted and complex regulatory systems, is likely closely interwoven with their increase in complexity and adaptive radiation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr></abbrgrp>. Mosses, however, might follow an entirely different strategy, being generalists rather then specialists in terms of their metabolic gene complement, growing in habitats not readily accessible for seed plants.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Methods</p>
			</st>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Unigene set and ORF prediction</p>
				</st>
				<p>The dataset used consisted of 24,845 unigenes based on ~130,000 public <it>P. patens </it>expressed sequence tags (EST), the production parameters of which have been described before <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>. An evaluation of several tools for open reading frame (ORF) prediction was carried out, including ESTScan <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B66">66</abbr></abbrgrp>, FrameD <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B67">67</abbr></abbrgrp> and Estwise <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B68">68</abbr></abbrgrp>. As it turned out, using <it>A. thaliana </it>or plant-trained models yielded a high rate of false positive predictions for <it>P. patens </it>genes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>. Homology-based ORF prediction was hindered by the fact that the closest homologs often shared only 30&#8211;40% identity on amino acid level. By dividing all publicly available <it>P. patens </it>mRNAs into a training set (226 sequences) and a test set (100 sequences), FrameD turned out to be the most accurate individual tool. After testing, a <it>P. patens </it>specific hidden Markov model (HMM) for ESTScan and interpolated HMMs for FrameD were built by using all 326 sequences. In order to improve the quality of the predicted ORFs, FrameD was given the results of a BLASTX-search of the unigenes against Genpept using an E-value cutoff of 1E-10. ORFs were determined by combining the prediction results from ESTScan and FrameD, preferring the latter. In total, 19,313 ORF were detected by FrameD and 21,344 by ESTScan, the combination yielding 22,237 ORF which were used for further analyses.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Calculating the K<sub>S </sub>distribution</p>
				</st>
				<p>Two Perl scripts were written to identify clusters of paralogous genes and subsequently calculate K<sub>S </sub>distributions. The software ("KeyS") is available upon request. The method used to calculate Figure <figr fid="F1">1A</figr> is described below.</p>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Identification of pairs of paralogous genes</p>
					</st>
					<p>To identify similar sequences on peptide level, an all-against-all BLAST-search was performed using BLASTP with an E-value cutoff of 1E-10. Two sequences were defined as paralogs if the sequences could be aligned over a length of at least 150 amino acids and showed at least 30% identity <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>. Gene pairs with a BLAST identity of 98% or higher were further tested for identity because near identical sequences occasionally are present in clustered EST data due to sequencing errors and the fragmentary nature of EST. To do this, the nucleic acid sequences were aligned globally using the EMBOSS <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B69">69</abbr></abbrgrp> implementation of the Needleman-Wunsch algorithm, <it>needle</it>. Afterwards all leading and trailing gaps were removed from the alignment. Two sequences were then defined as identical if the aligned sequences had an identity of at least 98.0%. From all identical gene pairs the longer sequence was kept and all gene pairs containing the shorter sequence were discarded.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Clustering of paralogous genes</p>
					</st>
					<p>In order to reduce the computational complexity, genes were clustered prior to K<sub>S </sub>calculation. From the list of gene pairs, the genes of the pair with the highest BLAST-derived bit score were chosen as the first two genes of a new cluster. If several pairs shared the same bit score, the pair with the shortest alignment length was selected first. New members were subsequently added to the cluster using agglomerative linkage clustering until no more suitable candidate genes were left. After completion of each cluster, all gene pairs having at least one clustered member gene were deleted from the gene pair list.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Estimation of K<sub>S </sub>values for gene pairs</p>
					</st>
					<p>In a first step the peptide sequences were aligned globally using <it>needle</it>. Afterwards, all positions containing a gap were removed from the alignment and the amino acids were replaced by their corresponding codons. The nucleotide alignment was used to calculate the K<sub>S</sub>-value with the maximum likelihood method implemented in <it>codeml </it>of the PAML package <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B70">70</abbr></abbrgrp>. Codon frequencies were calculated from the average nucleotide frequencies at the three codon positions (codon frequency model F3 &#215; 4). Because codeml can get stuck in suboptimal likelihood maxima, the calculation was repeated five times and the K<sub>S</sub>-value with the highest likelihood was then assigned to the gene pair.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Calculating the K<sub>S </sub>values used in the distribution</p>
					</st>
					<p>To remove node-connecting K<sub>S </sub>values &gt; 5.0, subtree clustering based on the K<sub>S</sub>-values as distance measure was performed using average linkage clustering. Assuming that all genes in a resulting cluster with n members originate from the same ancestor gene, n-1 duplication events have taken place. However, the number of possible gene pairs or K<sub>S</sub>-values of a cluster with n members is n &#215; (n-1)/2, which exceeds the number of duplication events for n &gt; 2. Using all pairwise K<sub>S</sub>-values of a cluster directly in the age distribution would thus falsify it. Instead, we used approximate K<sub>S</sub>-values for the n-1 duplication events that were derived from the pairwise K<sub>S</sub>-values during the clustering. The merging steps taken during the K<sub>S</sub>-based clustering were represented in a bifurcating dendrogram. The terminal nodes represent the genes of the original cluster and each inner node represents the joining of two clusters, which also can be regarded as the duplication event giving rise to the two clusters. To each inner node, and each duplication event respectively, the average inter cluster K<sub>S</sub>-value of the merged gene clusters can be assigned. The inter cluster K<sub>S</sub>-values &#8804; 5.0 were used to represent the duplication events of the cluster in the age distribution.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Construction of linearized trees</p>
				</st>
				<p>We have inferred the age of <it>P. patens </it>duplicated genes by constructing linearized trees and comparing the time of gene duplication with the <it>A. thaliana</it>-poplar split or the monocot-eudicot split, following the method used by Vandepoele et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr></abbrgrp>. To this end, the 22,237 protein sequences of <it>P. patens </it>were grouped into 1,967 gene families containing two to ten <it>P. patens </it>proteins based on sequence similarity <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>. All protein sequences of each gene family were used as queries to do BLASTP searches against proteins from <it>Oryza sativa </it>(TIGR release 4), <it>Populus trichocarpa </it>(JGI version 1, released June 7, 2006), <it>Arabidopsis thaliana </it>(TAIR release 6), <it>Chlamydomonas reinhardtii </it>(JGI release 3), and <it>Ostreococcus tauri </it>(released August 8, 2006). Gene families were built and neighbor-joining trees were constructed using LINTREE <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr></abbrgrp> based on the alignments of each gene family <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr></abbrgrp>. Only those gene families that included at least one outgroup sequence (<it>C. reinhardtii </it>or <it>O. tauri</it>) and sequences that could be used as reference or calibration points (see below) to estimate the date of the <it>P. patens </it>duplication, i.e. sequences from at least two different organisms out of the three angiosperm species (rice, poplar and <it>A. thaliana</it>), and which all had to have higher BLASTP scores than that of the outgroup sequence, were considered for further analyses. Linearized trees, which assume equal rates of evolution in different lineages of the tree <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr></abbrgrp>, were constructed for each gene family after sequences evolving at highly deviated rates were removed <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr></abbrgrp>. The split of <it>A. thaliana </it>and poplar, or monocots (rice) and eudicots (<it>Arabidopsis </it>and poplar), set at 100 and 150 MYA, respectively, were used as reference points to estimate the age of the <it>P. patens </it>duplicates. Each node that was used for dating had to have bootstrap support &#8805; 70% <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B71">71</abbr></abbrgrp>. In cases where the tree had more than one reference point that could be used for dating, the duplication date was first calculated separately using each reference point. The tree was then discarded if the minimum and maximum date differed by &gt;20 MYA. If the difference was &#8804;20 MY, the average of the date estimates from all possible reference points was taken as the date of the duplication event.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Gene Ontology and pathway mapping</p>
				</st>
				<p>GO terms were assigned to the sequences using Blast2GO <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B44">44</abbr></abbrgrp> with an E-value cutoff of 1E-25 and a minimal hit length of 80 amino acids. The GO Slim annotation (which avoids the redundancy of GO term association) was created using the generic GO Slim file, GO terms, definitions and ontologies <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B72">72</abbr></abbrgrp>. It was determined (using five-fold leave-one-out cross validation) how many genes are necessary to do GO bias comparisons in order not to be affected by sampling bias. As it turned out, a sample size of at least 500 genes is sufficient to detect significantly biased categories. The fractions of genes assigned/devoid of individual GO terms were tested for deviation within the 765 duplicated genes in comparison with a randomly chosen reference set (excluding genes from the K<sub>S </sub>peak) of equal size (765 out of 2,202 possible genes) using Fisher's exact test. Resulting p values were adjusted to control for multiple testing by calculating the false discovery rate <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B73">73</abbr></abbrgrp>. Statistics were performed with R 2.1.0 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B74">74</abbr></abbrgrp>. The KEGG pathways were assigned to the sequences representing the peaks using KAAS (KEGG Automatic Annotation Server 1.10; <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B75">75</abbr></abbrgrp>). Searches were performed against the whole dataset with a bit score threshold of 60 and the bi-directional best hit method (BBH).</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Authors' contributions</p>
			</st>
			<p>SAR designed and supervised most of the research and wrote the paper, JI wrote the software and calculated the K<sub>S </sub>plot, JAF calculated the linearized trees, DL and AZ performed the GO and KEGG analyses, YVDP supervised part of the research and participated in writing the paper, RR participated in writing the paper.</p>
		</sec>
	</bdy>
	<bm>
		<ack>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Acknowledgements</p>
				</st>
				<p>The authors would like to thank J.P. Frahm, S. McDaniel, H. Schneider, M. von Stackelberg, H.K. Sten&#248;ien and S. Tintelnot for helpful comments on the manuscript. Financial support by the DFG (Re 837/10-1) is gratefully acknowledged.</p>
			</sec>
		</ack>
		<refgrp>
			<bibl id="B1">
				<title>
					<p>The origin and early evolution of plants on land</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Kenrick</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Crane</snm>
						<fnm>PR</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nature</source>
				<pubdate>1997</pubdate>
				<volume>389</volume>
				<fpage>33</fpage>
				<lpage>39</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/37918</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B2">
				<title>
					<p>The origin of plants: body plan changes contributing to a major evolutionary radiation</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Graham</snm>
						<fnm>LE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cook</snm>
						<fnm>ME</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Busse</snm>
						<fnm>JS</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>97</volume>
				<issue>9</issue>
				<fpage>4535</fpage>
				<lpage>4540</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.97.9.4535</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B3">
				<title>
					<p>Life history biology of early land plants: deciphering the gametophyte phase</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Taylor</snm>
						<fnm>TN</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kerp</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hass</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>102</volume>
				<issue>16</issue>
				<fpage>5892</fpage>
				<lpage>5897</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.0501985102</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B4">
				<title>
					<p>Bryology 1947-1972</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Anderson</snm>
						<fnm>LE</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Ann Miss Bot Gard</source>
				<pubdate>1974</pubdate>
				<volume>61</volume>
				<issue>3</issue>
				<fpage>56</fpage>
				<lpage>85</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/2395185</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B5">
				<title>
					<p>Structural Diversity of Bryophytes</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Crum</snm>
						<fnm>HA</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<publisher>Michigan , The University of Michigan Herbarium</publisher>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B6">
				<title>
					<p>Phytogeography of the Bryophyta</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Schuster</snm>
						<fnm>RM</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>New Manual of Bryology</source>
				<publisher>Nichinan </publisher>
				<editor>Schuster RM</editor>
				<pubdate>1983</pubdate>
				<fpage>463</fpage>
				<lpage>626</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B7">
				<title>
					<p>Bryophytes of the Pleistocene</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Dickson</snm>
						<fnm>JH</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>The British record and its chorological and ecological implication</source>
				<publisher>London and New York , Cambridge University Press</publisher>
				<pubdate>1973</pubdate>
				<fpage>256 pp</fpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B8">
				<title>
					<p>Moose - lebende Fossilien</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Frahm</snm>
						<fnm>JP</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>BuZ</source>
				<pubdate>1994</pubdate>
				<volume>24</volume>
				<issue>3</issue>
				<fpage>120</fpage>
				<lpage>124</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B9">
				<title>
					<p>Dating the diversification of the pleurocarpous mosses</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Newton</snm>
						<fnm>AE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wikstr&#246;m</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bell</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Forrest</snm>
						<fnm>LL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ignatov</snm>
						<fnm>MS</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Pleurocarpous mosses: Systematics and Evolution</source>
				<publisher>CRC Press, Boca Raton , Systematics Association</publisher>
				<editor>Tangney N</editor>
				<pubdate>2006</pubdate>
				<volume>Special Volume 71</volume>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B10">
				<title>
					<p>Evolution of leafy liverworts (Jungermanniidae, Marchantiophyta): estimating divergence times from chloroplast DNA sequences using penalized likelihood with integrated fossil evidence</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Heinrichs</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hentschel</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wilson</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Feldberg</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schneider</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Taxon</source>
				<pubdate>2007</pubdate>
				<volume>56</volume>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B11">
				<title>
					<p>Evolution by gene duplication</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Ohno</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<publisher>New York , Springer</publisher>
				<pubdate>1970</pubdate>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B12">
				<title>
					<p>Duplication and divergence: the evolution of new genes and old ideas</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Taylor</snm>
						<fnm>JS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Raes</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Annu Rev Genet</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>38</volume>
				<fpage>615</fpage>
				<lpage>643</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.092831</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B13">
				<title>
					<p>Genome duplication and the origin of angiosperms</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>De Bodt</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Maere</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Van de Peer</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Trends Ecol Evol</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>20</volume>
				<issue>11</issue>
				<fpage>591</fpage>
				<lpage>597</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.008</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B14">
				<title>
					<p>Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Bowers</snm>
						<fnm>JE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Chapman</snm>
						<fnm>BA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rong</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Paterson</snm>
						<fnm>AH</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nature</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>422</volume>
				<issue>6930</issue>
				<fpage>433</fpage>
				<lpage>438</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nature01521</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B15">
				<title>
					<p>Angiosperm diversification and paleolatitudinal gradients in Cretaceous floristic diversity</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Crane</snm>
						<fnm>PR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lidgard</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Science</source>
				<pubdate>1989</pubdate>
				<volume>246</volume>
				<fpage>675</fpage>
				<lpage>678</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.246.4930.675</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B16">
				<title>
					<p>Functional divergence of duplicated genes formed by polyploidy during Arabidopsis evolution</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Blanc</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wolfe</snm>
						<fnm>KH</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Cell</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>16</volume>
				<fpage>1679</fpage>
				<lpage>1691</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1105/tpc.021410</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B17">
				<title>
					<p>The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. &amp; Gray)</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Tuskan</snm>
						<fnm>GA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Difazio</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Jansson</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bohlmann</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Grigoriev</snm>
						<fnm>I</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hellsten</snm>
						<fnm>U</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Putnam</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ralph</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rombauts</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Salamov</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schein</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sterck</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Aerts</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bhalerao</snm>
						<fnm>RR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bhalerao</snm>
						<fnm>RP</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Blaudez</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Boerjan</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Brun</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Brunner</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Busov</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Campbell</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Carlson</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Chalot</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Chapman</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Chen</snm>
						<fnm>GL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cooper</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Coutinho</snm>
						<fnm>PM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Couturier</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Covert</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cronk</snm>
						<fnm>Q</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cunningham</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Davis</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Degroeve</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Dejardin</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Depamphilis</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Detter</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Dirks</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Dubchak</snm>
						<fnm>I</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Duplessis</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ehlting</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ellis</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gendler</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Goodstein</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gribskov</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Grimwood</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Groover</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gunter</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hamberger</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Heinze</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Helariutta</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Henrissat</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Holligan</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Holt</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Huang</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Islam-Faridi</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Jones</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Jones-Rhoades</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Jorgensen</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Joshi</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kangasjarvi</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Karlsson</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kelleher</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kirkpatrick</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kirst</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kohler</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kalluri</snm>
						<fnm>U</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Larimer</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Leebens-Mack</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Leple</snm>
						<fnm>JC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Locascio</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lou</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lucas</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Martin</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Montanini</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Napoli</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nelson</snm>
						<fnm>DR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nelson</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nieminen</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nilsson</snm>
						<fnm>O</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Pereda</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Peter</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Philippe</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Pilate</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Poliakov</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Razumovskaya</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Richardson</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rinaldi</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ritland</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rouze</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ryaboy</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schmutz</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schrader</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Segerman</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shin</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Siddiqui</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sterky</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Terry</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Tsai</snm>
						<fnm>CJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Uberbacher</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Unneberg</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Vahala</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wall</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wessler</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yang</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yin</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Douglas</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Marra</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sandberg</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Van de Peer</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rokhsar</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Science</source>
				<pubdate>2006</pubdate>
				<volume>313</volume>
				<issue>5793</issue>
				<fpage>1596</fpage>
				<lpage>1604</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.1128691</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B18">
				<title>
					<p>Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Cui</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wall</snm>
						<fnm>PK</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Leebens-Mack</snm>
						<fnm>JH</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lindsay</snm>
						<fnm>BG</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Soltis</snm>
						<fnm>DE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Doyle</snm>
						<fnm>JJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Soltis</snm>
						<fnm>PS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Carlson</snm>
						<fnm>JE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Arumuganathan</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Barakat</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Albert</snm>
						<fnm>VA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ma</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Depamphilis</snm>
						<fnm>CW</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genome Res</source>
				<pubdate>2006</pubdate>
				<volume>15</volume>
				<fpage>15</fpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B19">
				<title>
					<p>Modeling gene and genome duplications in eukaryotes</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Maere</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>De Bodt</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Raes</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Casneuf</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Van Montagu</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kuiper</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Van de Peer</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>102</volume>
				<fpage>5454</fpage>
				<lpage>5459</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.0501102102</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B20">
				<title>
					<p>Genome duplication led to highly selective expansion of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Seoighe</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gehring</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Trends Genet</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>20</volume>
				<fpage>461</fpage>
				<lpage>464</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.tig.2004.07.008</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B21">
				<title>
					<p>Gene-balanced duplications, like tetraploidy, provide predictable drive to increase morphological complexity</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Freeling</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Thomas</snm>
						<fnm>BC</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genome Res</source>
				<pubdate>2006</pubdate>
				<volume>16</volume>
				<issue>7</issue>
				<fpage>805</fpage>
				<lpage>814</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1101/gr.3681406</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B22">
				<title>
					<p>Representation and high-quality annotation of the Physcomitrella patens transcriptome demonstrates a high proportion of proteins involved in metabolism among mosses</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Lang</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Eisinger</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Reski</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rensing</snm>
						<fnm>SA</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Biol</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>7</volume>
				<fpage>228</fpage>
				<lpage>237</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1055/s-2005-837578</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B23">
				<title>
					<p>Protein encoding genes in an ancient plant: analysis of codon usage, retained genes and splice sites in a moss, Physcomitrella patens</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Rensing</snm>
						<fnm>SA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Fritzowsky</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lang</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Reski</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>BMC Genomics</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>6</volume>
				<issue>1</issue>
				<fpage>43</fpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-6-43</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B24">
				<title>
					<p>Moss transcriptome and beyond</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Rensing</snm>
						<fnm>SA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rombauts</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Van de Peer</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Reski</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Trends Plant Sci</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>7</volume>
				<issue>12</issue>
				<fpage>535</fpage>
				<lpage>538</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02363-4</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B25">
				<title>
					<p>Evolutionary analyses of the human genome</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Li</snm>
						<fnm>WH</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gu</snm>
						<fnm>Z</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nekrutenko</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nature</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>409</volume>
				<issue>6822</issue>
				<fpage>847</fpage>
				<lpage>849</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/35057039</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B26">
				<title>
					<p>Molecular evolution</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Li</snm>
						<fnm>WH</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<publisher>Sunderland , Sinauer</publisher>
				<pubdate>1997</pubdate>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B27">
				<title>
					<p>The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Lynch</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Conery</snm>
						<fnm>JS</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Science</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>290</volume>
				<fpage>1151</fpage>
				<lpage>1155</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.290.5494.1151</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B28">
				<title>
					<p>Adaptive basis of codon usage in the haploid moss Physcomitrella patens</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Stenoien</snm>
						<fnm>HK</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Heredity</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>94</volume>
				<fpage>87</fpage>
				<lpage>93</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/sj.hdy.6800547</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B29">
				<title>
					<p>Phylogenetic test of the molecular clock and linearized trees</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Takezaki</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rzhetsky</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nei</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Mol Biol Evol</source>
				<pubdate>1995</pubdate>
				<volume>12</volume>
				<issue>5</issue>
				<fpage>823</fpage>
				<lpage>833</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B30">
				<title>
					<p>Major events in the genome evolution of vertebrates: paranome age and size differ considerably between ray-finned fishes and land vertebrates</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Vandepoele</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>De Vos</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Taylor</snm>
						<fnm>JS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Meyer</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Van de Peer</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>101</volume>
				<issue>6</issue>
				<fpage>1638</fpage>
				<lpage>1643</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.0307968100</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B31">
				<title>
					<p>Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Wikstrom</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Savolainen</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Chase</snm>
						<fnm>MW</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Proc Biol Sci</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>268</volume>
				<issue>1482</issue>
				<fpage>2211</fpage>
				<lpage>2220</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1098/rspb.2001.1782</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B32">
				<title>
					<p>Dating the monocot-dicot divergence and the origin of core eudicots using whole chloroplast genomes</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Chaw</snm>
						<fnm>SM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Chang</snm>
						<fnm>CC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Chen</snm>
						<fnm>HL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Li</snm>
						<fnm>WH</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Mol Evol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>58</volume>
				<issue>4</issue>
				<fpage>424</fpage>
				<lpage>441</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00239-003-2564-9</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B33">
				<title>
					<p>Taxon sampling effects in molecular clock dating: an example from the African Restionaceae</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Linder</snm>
						<fnm>HP</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hardy</snm>
						<fnm>CR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rutschmann</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Mol Phylogenet Evol</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>35</volume>
				<issue>3</issue>
				<fpage>569</fpage>
				<lpage>582</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.ympev.2004.12.006</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B34">
				<title>
					<p>Comparative evolutionary analysis of chalcone synthase and alcohol dehydrogenase loci in Arabidopsis, Arabis and related genera (Brassicaceae)</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Koch</snm>
						<fnm>MA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Haubold</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mitchell-Olds</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Mol Biol Evol</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>17</volume>
				<fpage>1483</fpage>
				<lpage>1498</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B35">
				<title>
					<p>Computational approaches to unveiling ancient genome duplications</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Van de Peer</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nat Rev Genet</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>5</volume>
				<issue>10</issue>
				<fpage>752</fpage>
				<lpage>763</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nrg1449</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B36">
				<title>
					<p>Effect of ploidy level on growth, differentiation and phenotype in Physcomitrella patens</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Schween</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hohe</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schulte</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Reski</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>The Bryologist</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>108</volume>
				<fpage>27</fpage>
				<lpage>35</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1639/0007-2745(2005)108[27:EOPLOG]2.0.CO;2</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B37">
				<title>
					<p>Large-scale analysis of 73,329 gene-disrupted Physcomitrella mutants: production parameters and mutant phenotypes</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Schween</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Egener</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Fritzkowsky</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Granado</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Guitton</snm>
						<fnm>MC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hartmann</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hohe</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Holtorf</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lang</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lucht</snm>
						<fnm>JM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Reinhard</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rensing</snm>
						<fnm>SA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schlink</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schulte</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Reski</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Biology</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>7</volume>
				<fpage>238</fpage>
				<lpage>250</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1055/s-2005-837692</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B38">
				<title>
					<p>Genetics of Bryophyta</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Cove</snm>
						<fnm>DJ</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>New manual of Bryology</source>
				<publisher>Tokyo , Hatt Botanical Laboratory</publisher>
				<editor>Schuster RM</editor>
				<pubdate>1983</pubdate>
				<fpage>222</fpage>
				<lpage>231</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B39">
				<title>
					<p>Allopolyploidy--a shaping force in the evolution of wheat genomes</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Feldman</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Levy</snm>
						<fnm>AA</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Cytogenet Genome Res</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>109</volume>
				<issue>1-3</issue>
				<fpage>250</fpage>
				<lpage>258</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1159/000082407</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B40">
				<title>
					<p>Genome evolution of allopolyploids: a process of cytological and genetic diploidization</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Ma</snm>
						<fnm>XF</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gustafson</snm>
						<fnm>JP</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Cytogenet Genome Res</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>109</volume>
				<issue>1-3</issue>
				<fpage>236</fpage>
				<lpage>249</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1159/000082406</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B41">
				<title>
					<p>Index to bryophyte chromosome counts</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Fritsch</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Bryophytorum Bibliotheca</source>
				<publisher>Berlin, Stuttgart , J. Cramer / Gebrueder Borntraeger</publisher>
				<editor>Frahm JP, Gradstein SR</editor>
				<pubdate>1991</pubdate>
				<volume>40</volume>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B42">
				<title>
					<p>The induction of biochemical and morphological mutants in the moss Physcomitrella patens</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Engel</snm>
						<fnm>PP</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>American Journal of Botany</source>
				<pubdate>1968</pubdate>
				<volume>55</volume>
				<issue>4</issue>
				<fpage>438</fpage>
				<lpage>446</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/2440573</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B43">
				<title>
					<p>Genome analysis of the moss Physcomitrella patens (Hedw.) B.S.G</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Reski</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Faust</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>XH</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wehe</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Abel</snm>
						<fnm>WO</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Mol Gen Genet</source>
				<pubdate>1994</pubdate>
				<volume>244</volume>
				<issue>4</issue>
				<fpage>352</fpage>
				<lpage>359</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF00286686</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B44">
				<title>
					<p>Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Conesa</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gotz</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Garcia-Gomez</snm>
						<fnm>JM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Terol</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Talon</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Robles</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Bioinformatics</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>21</volume>
				<issue>18</issue>
				<fpage>3674</fpage>
				<lpage>3676</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B45">
				<title>
					<p>The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Harris</snm>
						<fnm>MA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Clark</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ireland</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lomax</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ashburner</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Foulger</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Eilbeck</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lewis</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Marshall</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mungall</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Richter</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rubin</snm>
						<fnm>GM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Blake</snm>
						<fnm>JA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bult</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Dolan</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Drabkin</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Eppig</snm>
						<fnm>JT</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hill</snm>
						<fnm>DP</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ni</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ringwald</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Balakrishnan</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cherry</snm>
						<fnm>JM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Christie</snm>
						<fnm>KR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Costanzo</snm>
						<fnm>MC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Dwight</snm>
						<fnm>SS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Engel</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Fisk</snm>
						<fnm>DG</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hirschman</snm>
						<fnm>JE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hong</snm>
						<fnm>EL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nash</snm>
						<fnm>RS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sethuraman</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Theesfeld</snm>
						<fnm>CL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Botstein</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Dolinski</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Feierbach</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Berardini</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mundodi</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rhee</snm>
						<fnm>SY</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Apweiler</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Barrell</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Camon</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Dimmer</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lee</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Chisholm</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gaudet</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kibbe</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kishore</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schwarz</snm>
						<fnm>EM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sternberg</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gwinn</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hannick</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wortman</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Berriman</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wood</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>de la Cruz</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Tonellato</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Jaiswal</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Seigfried</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>White</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nucleic Acids Research</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>32 Database issue</volume>
				<fpage>D258</fpage>
				<lpage>61</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B46">
				<title>
					<p>A recent polyploidy superimposed on older large-scale duplications in the Arabidopsis genome</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Blanc</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hokamp</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wolfe</snm>
						<fnm>KH</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genome Res</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>13</volume>
				<issue>2</issue>
				<fpage>137</fpage>
				<lpage>144</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1101/gr.751803</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B47">
				<title>
					<p>Many gene and domain families have convergent fates following independent whole-genome duplication events in Arabidopsis, Oryza, Saccharomyces and Tetraodon</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Paterson</snm>
						<fnm>AH</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Chapman</snm>
						<fnm>BA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kissinger</snm>
						<fnm>JC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bowers</snm>
						<fnm>JE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Feltus</snm>
						<fnm>FA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Estill</snm>
						<fnm>JC</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Trends Genet</source>
				<pubdate>2006</pubdate>
				<volume>22</volume>
				<issue>11</issue>
				<fpage>597</fpage>
				<lpage>602</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.tig.2006.09.003</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B48">
				<title>
					<p>Bryophyte Ecology.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Glime</snm>
						<fnm>JM</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Volume 1 Physiological Ecology</source>
				<publisher> Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists.</publisher>
				<editor>Glime JM</editor>
				<pubdate>2007</pubdate>
				<volume>1</volume>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B49">
				<title>
					<p>Functional knockout of the adenosine 5'-phosphosulfate reductase gene in Physcomitrella patens revives an old route of sulfate assimilation</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Koprivova</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Meyer</snm>
						<fnm>AJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schween</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Herschbach</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Reski</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kopriva</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Journal of Biological Chemistry</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>277</volume>
				<issue>35</issue>
				<fpage>32195</fpage>
				<lpage>32201</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.M204971200</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B50">
				<title>
					<p>A bifunctional delta-fatty acyl acetylenase/desaturase from the moss Ceratodon purpureus. A new member of the cytochrome b5 superfamily</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Sperling</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lee</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Girke</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zahringer</snm>
						<fnm>U</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Stymne</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Heinz</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Eur J Biochem</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>267</volume>
				<issue>12</issue>
				<fpage>3801</fpage>
				<lpage>3811</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01418.x</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B51">
				<title>
					<p>Cloning and functional characterisation of an enzyme involved in the elongation of Delta6-polyunsaturated fatty acids from the moss Physcomitrella patens</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Zank</snm>
						<fnm>TK</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zahringer</snm>
						<fnm>U</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Beckmann</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Pohnert</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Boland</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Holtorf</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Reski</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lerchl</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Heinz</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>The Plant Journal</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>31</volume>
				<issue>3</issue>
				<fpage>255</fpage>
				<lpage>268</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01354.x</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B52">
				<title>
					<p>The moss Physcomitrella patens releases a tetracyclic diterpene</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Von Schwartzenberg</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schultze</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kassner</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Cell Reports</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>22</volume>
				<issue>10</issue>
				<fpage>780</fpage>
				<lpage>786</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00299-004-0754-6</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B53">
				<title>
					<p>Identification and functional characterization of the moss Physcomitrella patens delta5-desaturase gene involved in arachidonic and eicosapentaenoic acid biosynthesis</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Kaewsuwan</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cahoon</snm>
						<fnm>EB</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Perroud</snm>
						<fnm>PF</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wiwat</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Panvisavas</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Quatrano</snm>
						<fnm>RS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cove</snm>
						<fnm>DJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bunyapraphatsara</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Biol Chem</source>
				<pubdate>2006</pubdate>
				<volume>281</volume>
				<issue>31</issue>
				<fpage>21988</fpage>
				<lpage>21997</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.M603022200</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B54">
				<title>
					<p>Identification of a novel delta 6-acyl-group desaturase by targeted gene disruption in Physcomitrella patens</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Girke</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schmidt</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zahringer</snm>
						<fnm>U</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Reski</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Heinz</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>The Plant Journal</source>
				<pubdate>1998</pubdate>
				<volume>15</volume>
				<issue>1</issue>
				<fpage>39</fpage>
				<lpage>48</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1365-313X.1998.00178.x</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B55">
				<title>
					<p>A multifunctional lipoxygenase with fatty acid hydroperoxide cleaving activity from the moss Physcomitrella patens</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Senger</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wichard</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kunze</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gobel</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lerchl</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Pohnert</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Feussner</snm>
						<fnm>I</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Biol Chem</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>280</volume>
				<issue>9</issue>
				<fpage>7588</fpage>
				<lpage>7596</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.M411738200</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B56">
				<title>
					<p>Biosynthesis of C9-aldehydes in the moss Physcomitrella patens</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Stumpe</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bode</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gobel</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wichard</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schaaf</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Frank</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Frank</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Reski</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Pohnert</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Feussner</snm>
						<fnm>I</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Biochim Biophys Acta</source>
				<pubdate>2006</pubdate>
				<volume>1761</volume>
				<issue>3</issue>
				<fpage>301</fpage>
				<lpage>312</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B57">
				<title>
					<p>Emission of ent-kaurene, a diterpenoid hydrocarbon precursor for gibberellins, into the headspace from plants</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Otsuka</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kenmoku</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ogawa</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Okada</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mitsuhashi</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sassa</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kamiya</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Toyomasu</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yamaguchi</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Cell Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>45</volume>
				<issue>9</issue>
				<fpage>1129</fpage>
				<lpage>1138</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/pcp/pch149</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B58">
				<title>
					<p>Identification and functional analysis of bifunctional ent-kaurene synthase from the moss Physcomitrella patens</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Hayashi</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kawaide</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Notomi</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sakigi</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Matsuo</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nozaki</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>FEBS Lett</source>
				<pubdate>2006</pubdate>
				<volume>580</volume>
				<issue>26</issue>
				<fpage>6175</fpage>
				<lpage>6181</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.febslet.2006.10.018</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B59">
				<title>
					<p>Physcomitrella patens is highly tolerant against drought, salt and osmotic stress</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Frank</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ratnadewi</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Reski</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Planta</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>220</volume>
				<issue>3</issue>
				<fpage>384</fpage>
				<lpage>394</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00425-004-1351-1</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B60">
				<title>
					<p>The rehydration transcriptome of the desiccation-tolerant bryophyte Tortula ruralis: transcript classification and analysis</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Oliver</snm>
						<fnm>MJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Dowd</snm>
						<fnm>SE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zaragoza</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mauget</snm>
						<fnm>SA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Payton</snm>
						<fnm>PR</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>BMC Genomics</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>5</volume>
				<issue>1</issue>
				<fpage>89</fpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-5-89</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B61">
				<title>
					<p>Calmodulin-binding proteins in bryophytes: identification of abscisic acid-, cold-, and osmotic stress-induced genes encoding novel membrane-bound transporter-like proteins</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Takezawa</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Minami</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>317</volume>
				<issue>2</issue>
				<fpage>428</fpage>
				<lpage>436</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.03.052</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B62">
				<title>
					<p>Detoxification of dissolved SO2 (bisulfite) by terricolous mosses</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Bharali</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bates</snm>
						<fnm>JW</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Ann Bot (Lond)</source>
				<pubdate>2006</pubdate>
				<volume>97</volume>
				<issue>2</issue>
				<fpage>257</fpage>
				<lpage>263</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/aob/mcj026</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B63">
				<title>
					<p>Phototolerance of lichens, mosses and higher plants in an alpine environment: analysis of photoreactions</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Heber</snm>
						<fnm>U</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bilger</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bligny</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lange</snm>
						<fnm>OL</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Planta</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>211</volume>
				<issue>6</issue>
				<fpage>770</fpage>
				<lpage>780</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s004250000356</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B64">
				<title>
					<p>Protection of the photosynthetic apparatus against damage by excessive illumination in homoiohydric leaves and poikilohydric mosses and lichens</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Heber</snm>
						<fnm>U</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bukhov</snm>
						<fnm>NG</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shuvalov</snm>
						<fnm>VA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kobayashi</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lange</snm>
						<fnm>OL</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Exp Bot</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>52</volume>
				<issue>363</issue>
				<fpage>1999</fpage>
				<lpage>2006</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/jexbot/52.363.1999</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B65">
				<title>
					<p>Thermal energy dissipation in reaction centres and in the antenna of photosystem II protects desiccated poikilohydric mosses against photo-oxidation</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Heber</snm>
						<fnm>U</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bilger</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shuvalov</snm>
						<fnm>VA</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Exp Bot</source>
				<pubdate>2006</pubdate>
				<volume>57</volume>
				<issue>12</issue>
				<fpage>2993</fpage>
				<lpage>3006</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/jxb/erl058</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B66">
				<title>
					<p>ESTScan: a program for detecting, evaluating, and reconstructing potential coding regions in EST sequences</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Iseli</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Jongeneel</snm>
						<fnm>CV</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bucher</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<fpage>138</fpage>
				<lpage>148</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B67">
				<title>
					<p>FrameD: A flexible program for quality check and gene prediction in prokaryotic genomes and noisy matured eukaryotic sequences</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Schiex</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gouzy</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Moisan</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>de Oliveira</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>31</volume>
				<issue>13</issue>
				<fpage>3738</fpage>
				<lpage>3741</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/nar/gkg610</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B68">
				<title>
					<p>GeneWise and Genomewise</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Birney</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Clamp</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Durbin</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genome Res</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>14</volume>
				<issue>5</issue>
				<fpage>988</fpage>
				<lpage>995</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1101/gr.1865504</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B69">
				<title>
					<p>EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Rice</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Longden</snm>
						<fnm>I</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bleasby</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Trends Genet</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>16</volume>
				<issue>6</issue>
				<fpage>276</fpage>
				<lpage>277</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02024-2</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B70">
				<title>
					<p>PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Yang</snm>
						<fnm>Z</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Comput Appl Biosci</source>
				<pubdate>1997</pubdate>
				<volume>13</volume>
				<issue>5</issue>
				<fpage>555</fpage>
				<lpage>556</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B71">
				<title>
					<p>Statistical properties of bootstrap estimation of phylogenetic variability from nucleotide sequences. I. Four taxa with a molecular clock</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Zharkikh</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Li</snm>
						<fnm>WH</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Mol Biol Evol</source>
				<pubdate>1992</pubdate>
				<volume>9</volume>
				<issue>6</issue>
				<fpage>1119</fpage>
				<lpage>1147</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B72">
				<title>
					<p>GO slim</p>
				</title>
				<url>http://www.geneontology.org/GO.slims.shtml</url>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B73">
				<title>
					<p>Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Benjamini</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hochberg</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Royal Stat Soc B</source>
				<pubdate>1995</pubdate>
				<volume>57</volume>
				<fpage>289</fpage>
				<lpage>300</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B74">
				<title>
					<p>R project</p>
				</title>
				<url>http://www.r-project.org/</url>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B75">
				<title>
					<p>KEGG / KAAS</p>
				</title>
				<url>http://www.genome.jp/kegg/kaas/</url>
			</bibl>
		</refgrp>
	</bm>
</art>
