<it>Xenopus </it>importin beta validates human importin beta as a cell cycle negative regulator

1471-2121-9-14 1471-2121 Research article <it>Xenopus </it>importin beta validates human importin beta as a cell cycle negative regulator Delmar A Valerie vadelmar@yahoo.com Chan C Rene rchan@stanford.edu Forbes J Douglass dforbes@ucsd.edu

Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, Division of Biological Sciences 0347, University of California – San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0347, USA

Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA

BMC Cell Biology 1471-2121 2008 9 1 14 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2121/9/14 18366719 10.1186/1471-2121-9-14 20 11 2007 22 3 2008 22 3 2008 2008 Delmar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Human importin beta has been used in all Xenopus laevis in vitro nuclear assembly and spindle assembly studies. This disconnect between species raised the question for us as to whether importin beta was an authentic negative regulator of cell cycle events, or a dominant negative regulator due to a difference between the human and Xenopus importin beta sequences. No Xenopus importin beta gene was yet identified at the time of those studies. Thus, we first cloned, identified, and tested the Xenopus importin beta gene to address this important mechanistic difference. If human importin beta is an authentic negative regulator then we would expect human and Xenopus importin beta to have identical negative regulatory effects on nuclear membrane fusion and pore assembly. If human importin beta acts instead as a dominant negative mutant inhibitor, we should then see no inhibitory effect when we added the Xenopus homologue.

Results

We found that Xenopus importin beta acts identically to its human counterpart. It negatively regulates both nuclear membrane fusion and pore assembly. Human importin beta inhibition was previously found to be reversible by Ran for mitotic spindle assembly and nuclear membrane fusion, but not nuclear pore assembly. During the present study, we observed that this differing reversibility varied depending on the presence or absence of a tag on importin beta. Indeed, when untagged importin beta, either human or Xenopus, was used, inhibition of nuclear pore assembly proved to be Ran-reversible.

Conclusion

We conclude that importin beta, human or Xenopus, is an authentic negative regulator of nuclear assembly and, presumably, spindle assembly. A difference in the Ran sensitivity between tagged and untagged importin beta in pore assembly gives us mechanistic insight into nuclear pore formation.

Background

Vertebrate nuclear assembly is a complex process involving the sequential recruitment of specific proteins and membranes to chromatin. At the end of mitosis, membrane vesicles and/or ER membrane sheets arrive at the chromatin surface to fuse and form a unique structure consisting of two complete, encircling membrane bilayers 12. As soon as regions of double membrane form at the chromatin surface, nuclear pore complexes form within those regions perforating the membranes. Nuclear pore complexes span the bilayers and control virtually all traffic between the nucleus and cytoplasm 34. The 125-megadalton vertebrate nuclear pore is composed of multiple copies of ~30 different nucleoporins, only three of which are integral membrane proteins 5. The majority of nucleoporins are recruited from soluble cytoplasmic subunits. The assembly of these nucleoporins into the 500–1000 protein complex is a daunting task, as nucleoporins must sequentially and precisely assemble in the correct order and location 678. Determining the choreographed molecular mechanism by which nucleoporins assemble into functional pores within the double nuclear membranes is a matter of intense research.

The nuclear import factor, importin beta, and its regulatory counterpart, the small GTPase Ran, were revealed to be two key regulatory factors controlling this choreography, both for nuclear membrane fusion and separately for nuclear pore assembly 910111213. Addition of excess human importin beta to a Xenopus nuclear reconstitution system disrupts the endogenous ratio between importin beta and RanGTP. This disruption blocks proper nuclear membrane fusion and the subsequent step of nuclear pore assembly 910. The block to nuclear membrane fusion was found to be reversible by the positive regulator, RanGTP, but the block to pore assembly, oddly, was not 910. There is, however, much precedence for positive Ran effects on nuclear pore assembly: The addition of RanQ69L, a Ran mutant constitutively in the GTP-bound state, to the Xenopus reconstitution system causes greatly increased nuclear pore assembly and ectopic formation of additional pores in cytoplasmic membranes or annulate lamellae 91014151617. These studies led to the hypothesis that importin beta acts in the cell cycle to negatively regulate nuclear pore formation and that it does so by binding to nucleoporins, preventing them from interacting with one another. When such importin beta/nucleoporin complexes enter the vicinity of high RanGTP, importin beta preferentially binds RanGTP, releasing its hold on the nucleoporins. A high concentration of RanGTP is produced only around chromatin, due to the chromosomal localization of the RanGEF, RCC1 18192021. The freed nucleoporins are then able to interact with one another in the correct location and the correct ratio to form nuclear pores at the chromatin periphery 91022.

Prior to the discovery of its role as a negative regulator of nuclear membrane fusion and pore assembly, importin beta was elegantly shown by a number of groups to be a negative regulator of mitotic spindle assembly in Xenopus laevis egg extract 23242526272829, mammalian cell lines 2530, Drosophila Melanogaster 31, and Caenorhabditis elegans 32 (Reviewed in 11123334). In this arena, mitotic spindle assembly factors (SAFs) such as TPX2, NuMa, and XCTK2 are found to be imported into the nucleus by importin beta and localize there throughout interphase in Xenopus egg extract 2728353637 and mammalian cell lines 3538 (Reviewed in 394041). This sequestration effectively prevents the SAFs from interfering with interphase microtubule formation in the cytoplasm. At mitosis when the nuclear envelope breaks down, the SAFs are released from the nucleus and come under importin beta regulation. Binding of importin beta inhibits the SAFs throughout the cell, except in the vicinity of the RanGTP-rich chromosomes. There, importin beta preferentially binds to RanGTP, releasing its hold on the spindle assembly factors and allowing them to initiate mitotic spindle formation around the chromosomes.

These nuclear and spindle assembly studies on the regulatory role of importin beta were performed in interphase and mitotic assembly systems derived from Xenopus eggs 2326272835424344454647484950. In a Xenopus interphase egg extract, nuclei normally assemble spontaneously around added chromatin or DNA 51525354555657585960. In contrast, in a Xenopus mitotic egg extract, spindles spontaneously form around the added chromatin 6162. Thus, these in vitro systems are powerful tools for studying both nuclear and mitotic spindle assembly.

Upon further analysis, we realized that the recombinant importin beta used in all the Xenopus studies of nuclear and spindle assembly was, in actuality, human importin beta 910252728293037636465666768. (Xenopus importin beta had neither been identified nor cloned and thus was not available for the studies). The use of recombinant human importin beta in the Xenopus system led to a further key question: Is importin beta an authentic negative regulator of cellular function, or does human importin beta act as a dominant negative mutant as a result of sequence variation between the human and Xenopus proteins?

To address this question, in this study we identified, cloned, and tested recombinant Xenopus importin beta for its role in nuclear membrane fusion and nuclear pore assembly. We found Xenopus importin beta to act identically to human importin beta, i.e., it acts as a negative regulator of both nuclear membrane fusion and pore assembly, finally validating the conclusion that importin beta is an authentic negative regulator of cell cycle steps. However, in examining tagged importin betas, which include the form that has been used in all the previous studies, we found evidence that the tag renders importin beta mutant in its response to Ran, but does so specifically with respect to pore assembly. This impairment of importin beta raises interesting hypotheses as to why nuclear pore assembly is unique, which will be discussed here.

Results

Identification and cloning of Xenopus laevis importin beta

To address whether human importin beta acts as an authentic negative regulator of nuclear membrane fusion, pore assembly, and spindle assembly, or as a dominant negative mutant inhibitor due to inherent species sequence differences, we set out to identify and clone Xenopus importin beta. Overlapping Xenopus EST sequences showing homology to human importin beta were compiled from gene fragments present in the Xenopus EST database. A full-length Xenopus importin beta sequence was then cloned from total Xenopus RNA by reverse transcription and PCR. The resulting full-length Xenopus importin beta cDNA was cloned into an N-terminal His tag vector, pET28a, for both protein expression and sequencing. The corresponding nucleotide sequence was submitted to GenBank, Accession number EU286786. Sequence alignment revealed that Xenopus importin beta is 94% identical to human importin beta; however, 48 amino acids varied between the species, although often in a conserved manner (Figure 1). These 48 amino acids give scope for the hypothesis that potential "mutant" amino acids could cause a dominant negative phenotype with human importin beta.

Figure 1

Xenopus importin beta shows close homology to human importin beta

Xenopus importin beta shows close homology to human importin beta. The protein sequence of Xenopus importin beta shows very close homology to human importin beta with 94% identities (828/876, black boxes) and 97% positives (857/876 gray and black boxes). The amino acid composition, along with the length of the protein, is well conserved between Xenopus and human importin beta. Three of the conservative amino acid differences between the Xenopus and human importin beta sequence are at residues involved in FG-domain binding (F217Y [82–84], I265V [84], and L505V [84]).

To further eliminate any potential differences from endogenous Xenopus importin beta, we wished to use recombinant Xenopus importin beta free of purification tags. For this, the Xenopus importin beta clone was subcloned into a vector that introduced a cleavable GST tag. After the GST- importin beta was expressed and purified, the GST tag was removed by Precision Protease and the resulting untagged Xenopus protein was used in nuclear assembly studies.

Xenopus importin beta negatively regulates membrane fusion in a Ran-sensitive manner

With the Xenopus importin beta clone in hand, we set out first to ask whether it blocked nuclear membrane fusion when in excess. If no importin beta is added to a Xenopus laevis in vitro system, after one hour smooth fused membranes are formed and can be visualized with the membrane dye DHCC, as we also observed here (Figure 2, Control) 969. However, when we added excess untagged Xenopus importin beta at the beginning of a nuclear reconstitution reaction, nuclear membrane formation was blocked, as shown by the presence of fuzzy unfused membranes (Figure 2, +X-β). This inhibition of fusion was reversed by addition of RanQ69L-GTP, a form of Ran stably associated with GTP, as it cannot hydrolyze GTP (Figure 2, +X-β + Ran) 16. These results thus indicated that Xenopus importin beta acts identically to human importin beta in negatively regulating nuclear membrane fusion, and does so in a Ran-sensitive manner.

Figure 2

Xenopus importin beta is an authentic negative regulator of the fusion events in nuclear membrane formation

Xenopus importin beta is an authentic negative regulator of the fusion events in nuclear membrane formation. Addition of His-tagged Xenopus importin beta to a nuclear assembly reaction (+X-β) blocked nuclear membrane fusion, as shown by the lack of a solid nuclear rim stain by the green fluorescent membrane dye DHCC. The block to membrane fusion could be rescued by the addition of RanQ69L-GTP (+X-β +Ran). Where indicated, the added concentrations were 30 μM Xenopus importin beta and/or 40 μM RanQ69L-GTP. DNA was stained with DAPI. These observations are in accordance with experiments done with recombinant human importin beta in nuclear assembly reactions [9]. To better view the membranes, a section of the membrane stain (white dashed box) is enlarged by 3X (right panels). The bar represents 10 microns.

Xenopus importin beta negatively regulates nuclear pore assembly and is reversed by Ran

We next tested Xenopus importin beta for inhibition of nuclear pore assembly. We had previously shown that human importin beta blocks nuclear pore formation, but cannot be reversed by Ran 9. To investigate the effect of Xenopus importin beta on pore assembly, we first needed to bypass the inhibition of nuclear membrane fusion and look only at the nuclear pore assembly step. It has long been known that when the Ca⁺⁺chelator BAPTA is added to a Xenopus nuclear reconstitution reaction at t = 0', nuclei result that have a fused nuclear envelope, but no nuclear pores 95870. These "BAPTA pore-free nuclei," in consequence, do not stain with antibody directed against nucleoporins containing Phenylalanine-Glycine (FG) repeats (Figure 3, left panels) 958. Upon dilution of the BAPTA nuclei into Xenopus cytosol free of BAPTA, nuclear pores form normally, as previously described and shown here (Figure 3, cytosol + buffer) 9. This ability of BAPTA pore-free nuclei to be rescued provides a convenient system for investigating solely the effect of Xenopus importin beta on pore assembly 58. Here we found that, when BAPTA nuclei were diluted into cytosol containing Xenopus importin beta, the nuclei were not able to form nuclear pores (Figure 3, +X-β), identical to the block seen with human importin beta 9. Thus, we conclude that importin beta, either Xenopus or human, is indeed an authentic negative regulator of nuclear pore assembly.

Figure 3

Xenopus importin beta is an authentic negative regulator of nuclear pore assembly and is reversed by RanGTP

Xenopus importin beta is an authentic negative regulator of nuclear pore assembly and is reversed by RanGTP. Pore-free BAPTA nuclear intermediates, which have fused nuclear membranes but contain no nuclear pores (left panel), when diluted into fresh cytosol (+ buffer), incorporate nuclear pores. The addition of His-tagged human importin beta (+h-β-Tag) or Xenopus untagged importin beta (+X-β) prevented nuclear pore assembly. Addition of RanQ69L-GTP with His-tagged human importin beta (+h-β-Tag +Ran) could not reverse the beta block to pore assembly, as previously observed [9]. However, addition of RanQ69L-GTP with untagged Xenopus importin beta (+X-β +Ran) did reverse the beta block to pore assembly. Nuclear pores were detected by the monoclonal antibody mAb414, which recognizes FG nucleoporins (FG Nups). Where indicated, importin beta was added at 20 μM and RanQ69L-GTP at 30 μM. The bar represents 10 microns. Black squares on the drawings at the right indicate FG-staining nuclear pores.

Strikingly, when BAPTA nuclei were diluted into cytosol containing Xenopus importin beta and RanQ69L, the BAPTA defect was rescued by Ran, i.e., FG-containing nuclear pores formed (Figure 3, bottom panel, +X-β +Ran). This rescue differed from what was previously seen where Ran was unable to overcome the human importin beta block to pore assembly (see Figure 3, + h-β-Tag +Ran and 9). This new result prompted us to investigate the cause for the unexpected difference in Ran sensitivity.

Tagging importin beta causes insensitivity to Ran in its block to nuclear pore assembly

We considered the differing Ran reversibility results seen with human and Xenopus importin beta. Two possibilities existed: 1) either human importin beta differs from Xenopus importin beta with respect to its sensitivity to Ran, because of an inherent sequence difference in the importin beta coding sequence, or, 2) the His-tag present on the human importin beta used in all previous in vitro studies alters its sensitivity to Ran in a detrimental manner, but only with respect to pore assembly. To distinguish between these two mechanistic explanations, the BAPTA rescue experiment was next performed using tagged Xenopus importin beta, where an N-terminal His-tag was introduced. We found that tagged Xenopus importin beta acted identically to tagged human beta, i.e., it was not reversible by Ran (Figure 4A). Thus, the second model of tag-induced insensitivity to Ran appeared correct.

Figure 4

Altering importin beta by addition of a His-tag renders importin beta insensitive to RanGTP specifically in its block to nuclear pore assembly

Altering importin beta by addition of a His-tag renders importin beta insensitive to RanGTP specifically in its block to nuclear pore assembly. A. Pore-free BAPTA intermediates rescued in the presence of cytosol plus His-tagged Xenopus importin beta were not able to assemble nuclear pores (+Tag-X-β). When RanQ69L-GTP was added along with His-tagged Xenopus importin beta, the block to pore assembly could not be reversed (+Tag-X-β +Ran). Where indicated, importin beta was added at 10 μM and RanQ69L-GTP at 50 μM. The bar represents 10 microns. B. Pore-free BAPTA nuclear intermediates rescued in the presence of cytosol and untagged human or Xenopus importin beta were not able to assemble nuclear pores (+X-β or +h-β). The inhibitory concentration of 10 μM used here was determined to be the approximate minimum concentration for pore assembly inhibition in a separate experiment (data not shown). When RanQ69L-GTP was added along with untagged human importin beta, the block to pore assembly was partially reversed (+h-β +Ran). The Xenopus importin beta block was fully reversed (+X-β +Ran). To better visualize the FG-nucleoporin stain, a section of the images (white dashed box) was enlarged by 3X (right most panel). Where indicated, importin beta was added at 10 μM and RanQ69L-GTP at 50 μM. The bar represents 10 microns.

As a final test, however, an untagged form of human importin beta was cloned and used in a rescue experiment. We found that untagged human importin beta blocked the ability of nuclear pores to form when BAPTA-arrested nuclei were diluted into fresh cytosol (Figure 4B, +h-β). However, now RanQ69L rescued the pore assembly defect, albeit not as strongly as with the untagged Xenopus importin beta homologue (Figure 4B, compare +h-β +Ran with +X-β + Ran). Therefore, the first model of human importin beta acting as a dominant negative due to sequence variation is also plausible. Taken together, the data indicate that, specifically with respect to importin beta's block to pore assembly, wild-type human importin beta is less sensitive to Ran than Xenopus importin beta, and the presence of a His-tag on human importin beta renders it insensitive to Ran.

Discussion

In this study we validate importin beta as a negative regulator of cell cycle events, including nuclear membrane fusion and pore assembly. As all importin beta studies on nuclear and mitotic spindle formation using the Xenopus in vitro system to date have involved the addition of human importin beta, we asked whether the effects of importin beta were due to an inter-species sequence variation causing the human protein to act as a dominant negative mutant form. Instead we clearly show in experiments with Xenopus importin beta that this wild type protein acts as a true negative regulator.

Interestingly, during the course of this study we uncovered a mechanistic explanation for the Ran-insensitive importin beta block to pore assembly previously observed 9. Tagging importin beta at the N- (Xenopus) or C- (human) terminus was discovered to block importin beta's sensitivity to RanGTP (up to 100 μM of added Ran, data not shown) in Xenopus in vitro studies, but only in the realm of nuclear pore assembly. Both spindle assembly and nuclear membrane assembly are blocked by importin beta, but readily reversed by RanGTP 9. We showed that, upon removal of the tag, RanGTP now also reversed the block to pore assembly engendered by Xenopus importin beta and partially reverses the block by human importin beta.

Importin beta normally undergoes a significant conformational change upon RanGTP binding 71727374757677787980. It is therefore not inconceivable that even a small tag, such as the six histidine tag, could increase rigidity or cause an inability for importin beta to fully change conformation and thus be unable to release its binding partners correctly in response to RanGTP. What is surprising is that the tagged-importin beta insensitivity to RanGTP is only seen with respect to its role as a negative regulator of nuclear pore assembly. All other studies on the dynamics of importin beta and RanGTP in mitotic spindle assembly and nuclear membrane fusion have not shown an unresponsiveness of tagged-importin beta to RanGTP 910. One explanation for this might derive from the known association of importin beta with multiple FG-nucleoporins, suggesting that multiple sequential steps in pore assembly could potentially be regulated by importin beta 7481828384. The cumulative effect of an impaired importin beta being incompletely released by Ran at each step of pore assembly could explain the observed irreversibility of tagged importin beta's block specifically on nuclear pore assembly.

A second explanation for why importin beta's regulation of nuclear pore complex assembly differs from nuclear membrane fusion and spindle assembly with respect to Ran reversibility may involve how the targets of regulation interact with importin beta. What mechanistically might differ between spindle assembly factor (SAF) binding and nucleoporin (Nup) binding to importin beta? One study suggested a region of importin beta (aa 71–876) bound to SAFs and blocked spindle assembly when added to a mitotic extract, whereas amino acids 1–380 of importin beta had a lesser effect on spindle assembly 27, albeit other interpretations are also possible 38. Notably, importin beta has two known binding sites for nucleoporins, aa 1–396 near the N-terminus and aa 304–876 near the C-terminus 83. Importantly, the N-terminal Nup binding site of importin beta partially overlaps with the binding site for RanGTP 12727382838586. An intriguing possibility is that this N-terminal Nup binding site could be responsible for tagged importin beta's insensitivity to RanGTP with respect to pore assembly, as this site appears not to play a significant role in the regulation of mitotic spindle assembly.

There are as yet no identified molecular targets of importin beta with respect to nuclear membrane fusion that can be similarly analyzed. However, when an importin beta fragment (aa 45–462) containing the N-terminal Nup binding site, but lacking the importin alpha, RanGTP, and C-terminal Nup binding sites, is added, nuclear membrane fusion goes forward 9. Thus, the binding site on importin beta for the unknown membrane fusion factor or factors is not contained within this region (aa 45–462).

Perhaps the most surprising difference between tagged and untagged importin beta sensitivity to Ran is the differing effect on annulate lamellae (AL) pore formation versus nuclear pore formation. Importin beta blocks AL formation, but this block is reversed by RanGTP, whether tagged or untagged importin beta is used (10 and data not shown), which is clearly not the case for nuclear pore assembly. One explanation could be that AL formation may not be as stringent as nuclear pore assembly, as the pore complexes in AL do not necessarily need to function, whereas nuclear pore complexes must be functional. An alternative explanation could be that the tagged importin beta blocks an assembly step that is unique to nuclear pore assembly and not found in AL assembly. Whatever the tag-sensitive block to nuclear pore assembly is, it must occur after nuclear vesicle-vesicle fusion, as the importin beta block to pore assembly is observed using membrane-enclosed BAPTA intermediates as a starting point (Figures 3 and 4) 9.

The placement of the 6-Histidine tag at either the N- or C-terminus of importin beta appears not to matter. The human importin beta used in most Xenopus in vitro studies 91026293035636587 has a His tag at its C-terminus, while the tagged Xenopus importin beta constructed in this study has the tag at the N-terminus. We have not tested other types of tags on importin beta for their effect on pore assembly. Clearly, in the future functional studies using importin beta should take care to use an untagged version of importin beta or, alternatively, may specifically want to use a tagged version in order to study the mechanism of arrested nuclear pore assembly more closely.

Conclusion

By using species-specific importin beta for nuclear assembly studies we have now demonstrated that importin beta, human or Xenopus, is indeed an authentic negative regulator of nuclear assembly and, presumably, spindle assembly. In previous studies, the action of human importin beta could easily have been due to a dominant negative mutant effect, which would have required a different model of regulation. By performing the experiments here we now provide the evidence that importin beta must truly be a negative regulator in its wild type form.

Methods

Cloning and Sequencing of Xenopus importin beta

To obtain a sequence of Xenopus importin beta, overlapping Xenopus EST sequences showing homology to human importin beta were compiled from fragments present in the NIH Xenopus EST database. Full-length Xenopus importin beta was then cloned from Xenopus total RNA by reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification using the forward primer 5'-CCC

GGATCCATGGAGCTCGTCACCATCCTC-3' (with BamHI site underlined) and reverse primer 5'-CCCC

GCGGCCGCTCAGGCTTGGTTTTTCAG-3' (with NotI site underlined). The full-length Xenopus importin beta cDNA was cloned into the N-terminal His tag vector pET28a (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) (pET28a-Xbfl). GST-Xenopus importin beta (pGEX6P-Xbfl) was cloned by restriction digestion of pET28a-Xbfl with BamHI and NotI, and ligation of the insert into the pGEX6P-3 vector (Amersham Biosciences, Sweden) digested with the same restriction enzymes.

The sequence of Xenopus importin beta was confirmed by DNA sequencing of the pET28-Xbfl construct with two forward primers: T7 promoter and an internal primer (Xbfl intF1, 5' GCTGCACTGCAAAACCTGG 3') and a reverse primer, the T7 terminator primer. Human and Xenopus importin beta were aligned using the Clustal-W program and highlighted using BoxShade, both available through the Workbench program of the San Diego Super Computer Center 88.

Protein Expression and Purification

His-tagged proteins (Xenopus importin beta, human importin beta, and RanQ69L), were expressed and purified as previously described 9. RanQ69L was loaded with GTP as described previously 9.

To purify untagged human and Xenopus importin beta, pGEX6P-hbfl and pGEX6P-Xbfl were transformed into Rosetta DE3 competent cells (EMD Biosciences, Germany), expanded, and induced with 0.1 mM isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) overnight at 17°C. Glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads (Amersham Biosciences, Sweden) were used to purify the GST-tagged protein as per manufacturer's instructions. To remove the GST tag, purified proteins were cleaved on the column in the presence of 80 units of Precision Protease (Amersham Biosciences, Sweden) for 4 hours at 4°C. Untagged protein was eluted from the column and dialyzed into 5% glycerol/PBS and stored at -80°C.

Nuclear reconstitution and immunofluorescence

Nuclear reconstitution and 1,2-bis (2-aminophenoxy) ethane-N,N,N,N-tetraacetic acid (BAPTA) (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) nuclear reconstitution reactions were performed in the Xenopus egg extract system as described previously 9. FG nucleoporins were localized using an Alexa-488 directly labelled monoclonal antibody mAb414 (Covance, Berkeley, CA). Xenopus egg cytosol and membranes were prepared as previously described 56, except for the use of 500 mM KCl in the membrane wash buffer. After fixation in 3% formaldehyde, membranes were visualized by the lipophilic dye 3,3-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide (DHCC) (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). DNA was stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phylindole (DAPI). Nuclei were visualized with an Axioskop 2 microscope (63X objective; Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY).

Authors' contributions

VAD carried out the comparison between human and Xenopus importin beta and tagged vs. untagged importin beta. VAD drafted the manuscript.

RCC conceived of the original project, drafted parts of the manuscript, directed the cloning and sequencing of Xenopus importin beta, and performed preliminary characterization of His-tagged Xenopus importin beta.

DJF significantly contributed to the intellectual content and manuscript.

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Corine Lau and other members of the Forbes lab for helpful discussions, and Brian Sato for assistance with the cloning of Xenopus importin beta. The work described here was supported by a National Institutes of Health grant R01-GM033279 to D.J.F.

Nuclear membrane dynamics and reassembly in living cells: targeting of an inner nuclear membrane protein in interphase and mitosis Ellenberg J Siggia ED Moreira JE Smith CL Presley JF Worman HJ Lippincott-Schwartz J The Journal of cell biology 1997 138 1193 1206 10.1083/jcb.138.6.1193 9298976 Integral membrane proteins of the nuclear envelope are dispersed throughout the endoplasmic reticulum during mitosis Yang L Guan T Gerace L The Journal of cell biology 1997 137 1199 1210 10.1083/jcb.137.6.1199 9182656 Exploring nuclear pore complex structure and function in molecular detail Pante N Aebi U J Cell Sci Suppl 1995 19 1 11 8655639 Nuclear pore complex structure and plasticity revealed by electron and atomic force microscopy Maco B Fahrenkrog B Huang NP Aebi U Methods Mol Biol 2006 322 273 288 16739730 Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex Cronshaw JM Krutchinsky AN Zhang W Chait BT Matunis MJ The Journal of cell biology 2002 158 915 927 10.1083/jcb.200206106 12196509 Function and assembly of nuclear pore complex proteins Bodoor K Shaikh S Enarson P Chowdhury S Salina D Raharjo WH Burke B Biochem Cell Biol 1999 77 321 329 10546895 10.1139/bcb-77-4-321 Sequential recruitment of NPC proteins to the nuclear periphery at the end of mitosis Bodoor K Shaikh S Salina D Raharjo WH Bastos R Lohka M Burke B Journal of cell science 1999 112 Pt 13 2253 2264 10362555 The nuclear pore complex: structure, function, and dynamics Kiseleva E Goldberg MW Cronshaw J Allen TD Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression 2000 10 101 112 10813398 Importin beta negatively regulates nuclear membrane fusion and nuclear pore complex assembly Harel A Chan RC Lachish-Zalait A Zimmerman E Elbaum M Forbes DJ Molecular biology of the cell 2003 14 4387 4396 266759 14551248 10.1091/mbc.E03-05-0275 RanGTP mediates nuclear pore complex assembly Walther TC Askjaer P Gentzel M Habermann A Griffiths G Wilm M Mattaj IW Hetzer M Nature 2003 424 689 694 10.1038/nature01898 12894213 Spatial and temporal control of nuclear envelope assembly by Ran GTPase Clarke PR Zhang C Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 2004 193 204 15565882 Importin beta: conducting a much larger cellular symphony Harel A Forbes DJ Molecular cell 2004 16 319 330 15525506 Karyopherins: from nuclear-transport mediators to nuclear-function regulators Mosammaparast N Pemberton LF Trends in cell biology 2004 14 547 556 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.09.004 15450977 Spontaneous assembly of pore complex-containing membranes ("annulate lamellae") in Xenopus egg extract in the absence of chromatin Dabauvalle MC Loos K Merkert H Scheer U The Journal of cell biology 1991 112 1073 1082 10.1083/jcb.112.6.1073 1825658 Nuclear pore complex assembly studied with a biochemical assay for annulate lamellae formation Meier E Miller BR Forbes DJ The Journal of cell biology 1995 129 1459 1472 10.1083/jcb.129.6.1459 7790348 The role of the ran GTPase in nuclear assembly and DNA replication: characterisation of the effects of Ran mutants Hughes M Zhang C Avis JM Hutchison CJ Clarke PR Journal of cell science 1998 111 Pt 20 3017 3026 9739075 Purification of the vertebrate nuclear pore complex by biochemical criteria Miller BR Forbes DJ Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark) 2000 1 941 951 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2000.011204.x 11208084 Targeting of RCC1 to chromosomes is required for proper mitotic spindle assembly in human cells Moore W Zhang C Clarke PR Curr Biol 2002 12 1442 1447 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01076-X 12194828 Ran GTPase: a master regulator of nuclear structure and function during the eukaryotic cell division cycle? Clarke PR Zhang C Trends in cell biology 2001 11 366 371 10.1016/S0962-8924(01)02071-2 11514190 Running on Ran: nuclear transport and the mitotic spindle Dasso M Cell 2001 104 321 324 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00218-5 11239388 Nucleocytoplasmic transport: Ran, beta and beyond Kuersten S Ohno M Mattaj IW Trends in cell biology 2001 11 497 503 10.1016/S0962-8924(01)02144-4 11719056 Pushing the envelope: structure, function, and dynamics of the nuclear periphery Hetzer MW Walther TC Mattaj IW Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2005 21 347 380 16212499 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.090704.151152 A Rae1-containing ribonucleoprotein complex is required for mitotic spindle assembly Blower MD Nachury M Heald R Weis K Cell 2005 121 223 234 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.016 15851029 Spatial coordination of spindle assembly by chromosome-mediated signaling gradients Caudron M Bunt G Bastiaens P Karsenti E Science 2005 309 1373 1376 10.1126/science.1115964 16123300 Analysis of a RanGTP-regulated gradient in mitotic somatic cells Kalab P Pralle A Isacoff EY Heald R Weis K Nature 2006 440 697 701 10.1038/nature04589 16572176 Visualization of a Ran-GTP gradient in interphase and mitotic Xenopus egg extracts Kalab P Weis K Heald R Science 2002 295 2452 2456 10.1126/science.1068798 11923538 Importin beta is a mitotic target of the small GTPase Ran in spindle assembly Nachury MV Maresca TJ Salmon WC Waterman-Storer CM Heald R Weis K Cell 2001 104 95 106 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00194-5 11163243 Role of importin-beta in coupling Ran to downstream targets in microtubule assembly Wiese C Wilde A Moore MS Adam SA Merdes A Zheng Y Science 2001 291 653 656 10.1126/science.1057661 11229403 Role of importin-beta in the control of nuclear envelope assembly by Ran Zhang C Hutchins JR Muhlhausser P Kutay U Clarke PR Curr Biol 2002 12 498 502 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00714-5 11909537 Importin beta is transported to spindle poles during mitosis and regulates Ran-dependent spindle assembly factors in mammalian cells Ciciarello M Mangiacasale R Thibier C Guarguaglini G Marchetti E Di Fiore B Lavia P Journal of cell science 2004 117 6511 6522 10.1242/jcs.01569 15572412 Ran localizes around the microtubule spindle in vivo during mitosis in Drosophila embryos Trieselmann N Wilde A Curr Biol 2002 12 1124 1129 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00934-X 12121620 Ran GTPase cycle and importins alpha and beta are essential for spindle formation and nuclear envelope assembly in living Caenorhabditis elegans embryos Askjaer P Galy V Hannak E Mattaj IW Molecular biology of the cell 2002 13 4355 4370 138639 12475958 10.1091/mbc.E02-06-0346 Two birds with one stone – dealing with nuclear transport and spindle assembly Funabiki H Cell 2005 121 157 158 10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.003 15851021 The small GTPase Ran: interpreting the signs Quimby BB Dasso M Current opinion in cell biology 2003 15 338 344 10.1016/S0955-0674(03)00046-2 12787777 Ran induces spindle assembly by reversing the inhibitory effect of importin alpha on TPX2 activity Gruss OJ Carazo-Salas RE Schatz CA Guarguaglini G Kast J Wilm M Le Bot N Vernos I Karsenti E Mattaj IW Cell 2001 104 83 93 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00193-3 11163242 Importin alpha-regulated nucleation of microtubules by TPX2 Schatz CA Santarella R Hoenger A Karsenti E Mattaj IW Gruss OJ Carazo-Salas RE The EMBO journal 2003 22 2060 2070 156067 12727873 10.1093/emboj/cdg195 Importin alpha/beta and Ran-GTP regulate XCTK2 microtubule binding through a bipartite nuclear localization signal Ems-McClung SC Zheng Y Walczak CE Molecular biology of the cell 2004 15 46 57 307526 13679510 10.1091/mbc.E03-07-0454 LGN blocks the ability of NuMA to bind and stabilize microtubules. A mechanism for mitotic spindle assembly regulation Du Q Taylor L Compton DA Macara IG Curr Biol 2002 12 1928 1933 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01298-8 12445386 The Ran GTPase: theme and variations Dasso M Curr Biol 2002 12 R502 508 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00970-3 12176353 Beyond nuclear transport. Ran-GTP as a determinant of spindle assembly Kahana JA Cleveland DW The Journal of cell biology 1999 146 1205 1210 10.1083/jcb.146.6.1205 10491385 The Ran-GTPase and cell-cycle control Moore JD Bioessays 2001 23 77 85 10.1002/1521-1878(200101)23:1<77::AID-BIES1010>3.0.CO;2-E 11135312 Generation of GTP-bound Ran by RCC1 is required for chromatin-induced mitotic spindle formation Carazo-Salas RE Guarguaglini G Gruss OJ Segref A Karsenti E Mattaj IW Nature 1999 400 178 181 10.1038/22133 10408446 The ran GTPase regulates mitotic spindle assembly Kalab P Pu RT Dasso M Curr Biol 1999 9 481 484 10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80213-9 10322113 Self-organization of microtubule asters induced in Xenopus egg extracts by GTP-bound Ran Ohba T Nakamura M Nishitani H Nishimoto T Science 1999 284 1356 1358 10.1126/science.284.5418.1356 10334990 Stimulation of microtubule aster formation and spindle assembly by the small GTPase Ran Wilde A Zheng Y Science 1999 284 1359 1362 10.1126/science.284.5418.1359 10334991 Ran-GTP stabilises microtubule asters and inhibits nuclear assembly in Xenopus egg extracts Zhang C Hughes M Clarke PR Journal of cell science 1999 112 Pt 14 2453 2461 10381400 Ran-GTP coordinates regulation of microtubule nucleation and dynamics during mitotic-spindle assembly Carazo-Salas RE Gruss OJ Mattaj IW Karsenti E Nature cell biology 2001 3 228 234 10.1038/35060009 11231571 Ran stimulates spindle assembly by altering microtubule dynamics and the balance of motor activities Wilde A Lizarraga SB Zhang L Wiese C Gliksman NR Walczak CE Zheng Y Nature cell biology 2001 3 221 227 10.1038/35060000 11231570 Investigating mitotic spindle assembly and function in vitro using Xenopus laevis egg extracts Hannak E Heald R Nature protocols 2006 1 2305 2314 10.1038/nprot.2006.396 17406472 The Nup107-160 nucleoporin complex is required for correct bipolar spindle assembly Orjalo AV Arnaoutov A Shen Z Boyarchuk Y Zeitlin SG Fontoura B Briggs S Dasso M Forbes DJ Molecular biology of the cell 2006 17 3806 3818 1593160 16807356 10.1091/mbc.E05-11-1061 Spontaneous formation of nucleus-like structures around bacteriophage DNA microinjected into Xenopus eggs Forbes DJ Kirschner MW Newport JW Cell 1983 34 13 23 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90132-0 6224569 Roles of cytosol and cytoplasmic particles in nuclear envelope assembly and sperm pronuclear formation in cell-free preparations from amphibian eggs Lohka MJ Masui Y The Journal of cell biology 1984 98 1222 1230 10.1083/jcb.98.4.1222 6609160 Initiation of DNA replication in nuclei and purified DNA by a cell-free extract of Xenopus eggs Blow JJ Laskey RA Cell 1986 47 577 587 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90622-7 3779837 Nuclear reconstitution in vitro: stages of assembly around protein-free DNA Newport J Cell 1987 48 205 217 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90424-7 3026635 In vitro assembly of coiled bodies in Xenopus egg extract Bauer DW Murphy C Wu Z Wu CH Gall JG Molecular biology of the cell 1994 5 633 644 301079 7949420 Reconstituted nuclei depleted of a vertebrate GLFG nuclear pore protein, p97, import but are defective in nuclear growth and replication Powers MA Macaulay C Masiarz FR Forbes DJ The Journal of cell biology 1995 128 721 736 10.1083/jcb.128.5.721 7876300 RNA polymerase III transcription in synthetic nuclei assembled in vitro from defined DNA templates Ullman KS Forbes DJ Mol Cellular Biol 1995 15 4873 4883 http://mcb.asm.org/cgi/reprint/15/9/4873?view=long&pmid=7651406 7651406 230733 Assembly of the nuclear pore: biochemically distinct steps revealed with NEM, GTP gamma S, and BAPTA Macaulay C Forbes DJ The Journal of cell biology 1996 132 5 20 10.1083/jcb.132.1.5 8567730 Dimples, pores, star-rings, and thin rings on growing nuclear envelopes: evidence for structural intermediates in nuclear pore complex assembly Goldberg MW Wiese C Allen TD Wilson KL Journal of cell science 1997 110 Pt 4 409 420 9067593 Distinct AAA-ATPase p97 complexes function in discrete steps of nuclear assembly Hetzer M Meyer HH Walther TC Bilbao-Cortes D Warren G Mattaj IW Nature cell biology 2001 3 1086 1091 10.1038/ncb1201-1086 11781570 The use of Xenopus egg extracts to study mitotic spindle assembly and function in vitro Desai A Murray A Mitchison TJ Walczak CE Methods in cell biology 1999 61 385 412 9891325 Methods for studying spindle assembly and chromosome condensation in Xenopus egg extracts Maresca TJ Heald R Methods Mol Biol 2006 322 459 474 16739744 Dominant-negative mutants of importin-beta block multiple pathways of import and export through the nuclear pore complex Kutay U Izaurralde E Bischoff FR Mattaj IW Gorlich D The EMBO journal 1997 16 1153 1163 1169714 9135132 10.1093/emboj/16.6.1153 Phosphorylation of maskin by Aurora-A is regulated by RanGTP and importin beta Albee AJ Tao W Wiese C The Journal of biological chemistry 2006 281 38293 38301 10.1074/jbc.M607203200 17057251 Nuclear pores form de novo from both sides of the nuclear envelope D'Angelo MA Anderson DJ Richard E Hetzer MW Science 2006 312 440 443 10.1126/science.1124196 16627745 A mitotic lamin B matrix induced by RanGTP required for spindle assembly Tsai MY Wang S Heidinger JM Shumaker DK Adam SA Goldman RD Zheng Y Science 2006 311 1887 1893 10.1126/science.1122771 16543417 Mitotic functions of the Ran GTPase network: the importance of being in the right place at the right time Di Fiore B Ciciarello M Lavia P Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex) 2004 3 305 313 14726649 Spatial control of mitosis by the GTPase Ran Ciciarello M Mangiacasale R Lavia P Cell Mol Life Sci 2007 64 1891 1914 10.1007/s00018-007-6568-2 17483873 Mitosis-inducing factors are present in a latent form during interphase in the Xenopus embryo Dunphy WG Newport JW The Journal of cell biology 1988 106 2047 2056 10.1083/jcb.106.6.2047 3290226 TPEN, a Zn2+/Fe2+ chelator with low affinity for Ca2+, inhibits lamin assembly, destabilizes nuclear architecture and may independently protect nuclei from apoptosis in vitro Shumaker DK Vann LR Goldberg MW Allen TD Wilson KL Cell calcium 1998 23 151 164 10.1016/S0143-4160(98)90114-2 9601611 Different binding domains for Ran-GTP and Ran-GDP/RanBP1 on nuclear import factor p97 Chi NC Adam EJ Adam SA The Journal of biological chemistry 1997 272 6818 6822 10.1074/jbc.272.10.6818 9045717 Structure of importin-beta bound to the IBB domain of importin-alpha Cingolani G Petosa C Weis K Muller CW Nature 1999 399 221 229 10.1038/20367 10353244 Structural view of the Ran-Importin beta interaction at 2.3 A resolution Vetter IR Arndt A Kutay U Gorlich D Wittinghofer A Cell 1999 97 635 646 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80774-6 10367892 Structural basis for the interaction between FxFG nucleoporin repeats and importin-beta in nuclear trafficking Bayliss R Littlewood T Stewart M Cell 2000 102 99 108 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00014-3 10929717 Molecular basis for the recognition of a nonclassical nuclear localization signal by importin beta Cingolani G Bednenko J Gillespie MT Gerace L Molecular cell 2002 10 1345 1353 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00727-X 12504010 The structure of importin-beta bound to SREBP-2: nuclear import of a transcription factor Lee SJ Sekimoto T Yamashita E Nagoshi E Nakagawa A Imamoto N Yoshimura M Sakai H Chong KT Tsukihara T Yoneda Y Science 2003 302 1571 1575 10.1126/science.1088372 14645851 Structural and biochemical characterization of the Importin-beta.Ran.GTP.RanBD1 complex Saric M Zhao X Korner C Nowak C Kuhlmann J Vetter IR FEBS letters 2007 581 1369 1376 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.02.067 17359978 The hitchhiker's guide to the nucleus Conti E Nature structural biology 2003 10 8 9 10.1038/nsb0103-8 12490886 Nucleocytoplasmic transport: navigating the channel Bednenko J Cingolani G Gerace L Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark) 2003 4 127 135 12656985 Karyopherin flexibility in nucleocytoplasmic transport Conti E Muller CW Stewart M Current opinion in structural biology 2006 16 237 244 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.03.010 16567089 Major binding sites for the nuclear import receptor are the internal nucleoporin Nup153 and the adjacent nuclear filament protein Tpr Shah S Tugendreich S Forbes D The Journal of cell biology 1998 141 31 49 10.1083/jcb.141.1.31 9531546