<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
	<ui>gb-2004-5-7-r45</ui>
	<ji>GBJ</ji>
	<fm>
		<dochead>Research</dochead>
		<bibl>
			<title>
				<p>Recombination and base composition: the case of the highly self-fertilizing plant <it>Arabidopsis thaliana</it></p>
			</title>
			<aug>
				<au id="A1">
					<snm>Marais</snm>
					<fnm>G</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A2">
					<snm>Charlesworth</snm>
					<fnm>B</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A3" ca="yes">
					<snm>Wright</snm>
					<mi>I</mi>
					<fnm>S</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<insr iid="I2"/>
					<email>stephenw@yorku.ca</email>
				</au>
			</aug>
			<insg>
				<ins id="I1">
					<p>Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, EH9 3JT Edinburgh, UK</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I2">
					<p>Current address: Department of Biology, York University, 4700 Keele St, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada</p>
				</ins>
			</insg>
			<source>Genome Biology</source>
			<issn>1465-6906</issn>
			<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
			<volume>5</volume>
			<issue>7</issue>
			<fpage>R45</fpage>
			<url>http://genomebiology.com/2004/5/7/R45</url>
			<xrefbib>
				<pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmpid">15239830</pubid><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/gb-2004-5-7-r45</pubid>
				</pubidlist></xrefbib>
		</bibl>
		<history>
			<rec>
				<date>
					<day>26</day>
					<month>3</month>
					<year>2004</year>
				</date>
			</rec>
			<revrec>
				<date>
					<day>26</day>
					<month>4</month>
					<year>2004</year>
				</date>
			</revrec>
			<acc>
				<date>
					<day>30</day>
					<month>4</month>
					<year>2004</year>
				</date>
			</acc>
			<pub>
				<date>
					<day>14</day>
					<month>6</month>
					<year>2004</year>
				</date>
			</pub>
		</history>
		<cpyrt>
			<year>2004</year>
			<collab>Marais et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.</collab>
		</cpyrt>
		<shorttitle>
			<p>Recombination and base composition: the case of the highly self-fertilizing plant <it>Arabidopsis thaliana</it></p>
		</shorttitle>
		<shortabs>
			<p>The effects of recombination and self-fertilization on base composition were investigated both theoretically and experimentally in the <it>Arabidopsis</it> genome. Levels of inbreeding modulate the effect of recombination on base composition.</p>
		</shortabs>
		<abs>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Abstract</p>
				</st>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Background</p>
					</st>
					<p>Rates of recombination can vary among genomic regions in eukaryotes, and this is believed to have major effects on their genome organization in terms of base composition, DNA repeat density, intron size, evolutionary rates and gene order. In highly self-fertilizing species such as <it>Arabidopsis thaliana</it>, however, heterozygosity is expected to be strongly reduced and recombination will be much less effective, so that its influence on genome organization should be greatly reduced.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Results</p>
					</st>
					<p>Here we investigated theoretically the joint effects of recombination and self-fertilization on base composition, and tested the predictions with genomic data from the complete <it>A. thaliana </it>genome. We show that, in this species, both codon-usage bias and GC content do not correlate with the local rates of crossing over, in agreement with our theoretical results.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Conclusions</p>
					</st>
					<p>We conclude that levels of inbreeding modulate the effect of recombination on base composition, and possibly other genomic features (for example, transposable element dynamics). We argue that inbreeding should be considered when interpreting patterns of molecular evolution.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
		</abs>
	</fm>
	<meta>
		<classifications>
			<classification type="BMC" subtype="man_spc_id" id="30010019">Plant biology</classification>
			<classification type="BMC" subtype="man_spc_id" id="30010015">Model organisms</classification>
			<classification type="BMC" subtype="man_spc_id" id="30010010">Genome studies</classification>
		</classifications>
	</meta>
	<bdy>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Background</p>
			</st>
			<p>Recombination is probably a key factor in the evolution of genome organization in species such as yeast, mammals, <it>Drosophila </it>and <it>C. elegans</it>. In these species, genomic features such as nucleotide polymorphism <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr></abbrgrp>, GC content <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr></abbrgrp>, codon bias <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>, intron size <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>, transposable element density <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr></abbrgrp> substitution rates <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr></abbrgrp> and gene order <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp> vary widely within the genome, and are correlated with the local rate of crossing over. These observations are often explained as the result of various processes such as selective sweeps, background selection and weak Hill-Robertson interference (wHR), which all cause a reduction in the efficacy of natural selection in regions of reduced crossing over <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
			<p>Rates of crossing over have been shown to correlate not only with the GC content of synonymous sites, where weak natural selection is expected to act on codon-usage bias, but also with the GC content of noncoding sites <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp>. This is unlikely to be because GC bases are recombinogenic, as the correlation is far stronger with silent DNA than with total DNA <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr></abbrgrp>; see also <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>. This unexpected correlation may reflect the action of weak selection on noncoding GC, which would be less effective in regions of reduced recombination <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr></abbrgrp>. Alternatively, it could be an effect of biased gene conversion <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr></abbrgrp>. Biased gene conversion (BGC) is a process that preferentially converts A/T into G/C at sites heterozygous for AT and GC. The net effect of BGC is to increase the GC content of recombining DNA sequences. Assuming that the rate of this process is correlated with the rate of crossing over, BGC could therefore generate the observed increase in GC content in regions of high crossing over. An excess of AT&#8594;GC mutations in regions of high recombination could also lead to the observed correlation between GC content and recombination <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr></abbrgrp>. The relative importance of BGC, mutational biases, and wHR in driving these patterns remains unresolved <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr><abbr bid="B28">28</abbr></abbrgrp>, although BGC may be the most likely explanation, especially in organisms such as yeast and mammals, where there is a strong correlation between recombination and GC content <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
			<p>To date, most analyses of the role of recombination in determining genome structure have been done on outcrossing species, with the notable exception of the presumably partial selfer <it>C. elegans </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp>, whose selfing rate is not precisely known. In contrast, less attention has been given to <it>Arabidopsis thaliana</it>, which is known to be an almost complete selfer with a selfing rate of approximately 99% in the natural populations that have been studied <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr></abbrgrp>. High levels of inbreeding, as in <it>A. thaliana</it>, are expected to have important effects on the genomic structuring of base composition. Inbreeding leads to a strong increase in levels of homozygosity, which reduces the effective rate of recombination <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr></abbrgrp>. Therefore, processes sensitive to recombination and homozygosity, such as the effectiveness of selection on codon usage and the strength of BGC, will be affected by the high level of inbreeding apparently experienced by <it>A. thaliana </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
			<p>Previous work has provided evidence for a correlation between gene expression and codon bias in <it>Arabidopsis </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr></abbrgrp>, although the effect is weak. This suggests that translational selection is acting on codon bias in <it>Arabidopsis</it>. However, on the basis of the genes studied so far, no striking difference in codon bias between <it>A. thaliana </it>and its outcrossing congener <it>A. lyrata </it>has been observed, perhaps because of the population history of these species obscuring the expected patterns of molecular evolution <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr></abbrgrp>. Here we investigate the effect of inbreeding on the evolution of base composition (GC content and codon bias) within the <it>A. thaliana </it>genome, both theoretically and by DNA sequence analysis. Our goal was to test for an effect of recombination on GC content and codon bias in <it>A. thaliana</it>, and to use models to examine the joint effects of recombination and inbreeding on selection on codon usage and BGC, in order to help us to interpret the results from genome analysis. We show by computer simulation and modeling that selection on codon usage is not expected to vary with local recombination rate in a highly inbred species and that BGC is expected to be ineffective compared with an outcrossing species. We show that these predictions are consistent with the results of our analysis of the <it>A. thaliana </it>genome. We find no association between the local rate of crossing over and either codon bias or GC content (for both coding and noncoding regions).</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Results</p>
			</st>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Recombination and codon usage</p>
				</st>
				<p>Previous simulation results have shown that, in outcrossing species, weak selection on codon usage is expected to be significantly reduced in genomic regions with low rates of crossing over because of wHR effects <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr><abbr bid="B36">36</abbr><abbr bid="B37">37</abbr></abbrgrp>. We modified the model of <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp> by adding one additional parameter, the selfing rate <it>S </it>(see Materials and methods). The results for <it>S </it>= 0%, 50% and 99% for several values of the population recombination rate 4<it>N</it><sub><it>e</it></sub><it>r </it>(where <it>N</it><sub><it>e </it></sub>is effective population size and <it>r </it>is the per base rate of recombination) and two values of the strength of selection 4<it>N</it><sub><it>e</it></sub><it>s </it>(where <it>s </it>is the selection coefficient) are presented in Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>. The effect of crossing over on the efficacy of selection on codon usage decreases strongly with <it>S</it>. For <it>S </it>= 99%, which is probably close to the true value for <it>A. thaliana </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr></abbrgrp>, virtually no effect of crossing over is observed. This result reflects the strong reduction in the range of effective rates of recombination present in a selfing genome; high levels of homozygosity dramatically reduce the effective rate of recombination <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr></abbrgrp>, and therefore a given difference in <it>r </it>between two genomic regions will produce much greater differences in effective recombination rates in an outcrosser than in a selfer. Therefore, the theory predicts very weak or no associations between selection on codon usage and the rate of crossing over in <it>A. thaliana</it>. Results with intermediate selfing rates of 50% show a similar effect of recombination to that with complete outcrossing, suggesting the presence of a threshold level of inbreeding that leads to uncoupling of recombination from codon bias evolution.</p>
				<fig id="F1">
					<title>
						<p>Figure 1</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Simulation results showing the effect of recombination on the effectiveness of selection for codon usage under inbreeding</p>
					</caption>
					<text>
						<p>Simulation results showing the effect of recombination on the effectiveness of selection for codon usage under inbreeding. The figure shows the relationship between the recombination parameter 4<it>N</it><sub><it>e</it></sub><it>r </it>and the frequency of the optimal codon (<it>F</it><sub><it>op</it></sub>) for selfing rates (<it>S</it>) of 0 (black bars), 0.5 (gray bars) and 0.99 (white bars). <b>(a) </b>Value of the strength of selection 4<it>N</it><sub><it>e</it></sub><it>s </it>= 1; <b>(b) </b>4<it>N</it><sub><it>e</it></sub><it>s </it>= 4. All simulations involved 1,000 sites where 4<it>N</it><sub><it>e</it></sub><it>u </it>= 0.04.</p>
					</text>
					<graphic file="gb-2004-5-7-r45-1"/>
				</fig>
				<p>In <it>A. thaliana</it>, selection on codon usage seems to be relatively weak <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr></abbrgrp>. Thus, it is quite hard to identify the so-called 'optimal' codons, which are preferentially retained by translational selection. In other species such as <it>Drosophila </it>and <it>C. elegans</it>, optimal codons have been shown to correspond to the most abundant tRNAs in cells <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B38">38</abbr><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr></abbrgrp>. Using tRNA gene number as a proxy for tRNA expression, we redefined the list of optimal codons in <it>A. thaliana </it>as those corresponding to major tRNAs (S.I.W, C.B.K.Yau, M. Looseley, and B. Meyers, unpublished data). The frequency of these newly defined optimal codons (hereafter denoted <it>F</it><sub><it>op</it></sub>) is more strongly correlated with the level of gene expression than was the case in previous work (Spearman rank coefficient <it>R</it><sub><it>s </it></sub>= 0.26 with <it>p </it>&lt; 10<sup>-4</sup>). This is consistent with the idea that this new index better captures translational selection on codon bias than do previous ones.</p>
				<p>We then compared selection on codon usage measured by <it>F</it><sub><it>op </it></sub>with the rate of crossing over estimated from the comparison of genetic and physical maps for each chromosome arm (see Materials and methods). Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr> shows that there is no relationship between these parameters, with <it>F</it><sub><it>op </it></sub>being equal to approximately 0.49 throughout the genome. <it>R</it><sub><it>s </it></sub>= -0.02 with <it>p </it>&lt; 10<sup>-4</sup>. Although the <it>p </it>value is highly significant, the correlation coefficient implies that only 0.04% of the variability in <it>F</it><sub><it>op </it></sub>is explained by the rate of crossing over, and the <it>p </it>value reflects the large number of genes used in the analysis. There is thus virtually no genome-wide correlation between <it>F</it><sub><it>op </it></sub>and the rate of crossing over. It has been noted previously for other species that the genome-wide correlation between codon bias and recombination is weak, although large differences can be observed among chromosomes or chromosomal regions with very different rates of crossing over <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp>. This effect may result from poor map-based point estimates of recombination for any given locus, while global averages are much more reliable, as well as other causes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp>. In <it>A. thaliana</it>, as in many species, crossovers are suppressed near centromeres <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B40">40</abbr></abbrgrp>. If we compare the centromeric regions with the remainder of the genome, we find at most a 1% difference: in centromeric regions, <it>F</it><sub><it>op </it></sub>= 0.477 (<it>n </it>= 2005), and in the other regions, <it>F</it><sub><it>op </it></sub>= 0.486 (<it>n </it>= 13,243). In contrast, comparisons of centromeric regions with other genomic regions in <it>Drosophila </it>show striking differences, which are larger than 20% <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp>. Taken together, these observations suggest that selection on codon usage does not vary with the rate of crossing over in <it>A. thaliana</it>, in agreement with the theory.</p>
				<fig id="F2">
					<title>
						<p>Figure 2</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Genome-wide relationship between the frequency of optimal codons (<it>F</it><sub><it>op</it></sub>) and the rate of crossing over in <it>A. thaliana</it></p>
					</caption>
					<text>
						<p>Genome-wide relationship between the frequency of optimal codons (<it>F</it><sub><it>op</it></sub>) and the rate of crossing over in <it>A. thaliana</it>. Each crossing-over bin contains approximately 10% of the genes of the dataset. See Materials and methods section for details of the measurement of <it>F</it><sub><it>op </it></sub>and the rate of crossing over, in centimorgans per megabase (cM/MB).</p>
					</text>
					<graphic file="gb-2004-5-7-r45-2"/>
				</fig>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Recombination and GC content</p>
				</st>
				<p>BGC can be seen as a sort of meiotic drive, in which GC gametes are favored over AT gametes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B41">41</abbr></abbrgrp>. As high levels of inbreeding are associated with a strong decrease in heterozygosity, the strength of BGC should be dramatically reduced in inbreeders, because BGC can occur only in heterozygotes. The expected change in GC content due to BGC in the case of inbreeding can be derived straightforwardly from population genetics theory (see Materials and methods for details). By using standard diffusion equations modifed for inbreeding one can obtain the GC content at equilibrium under BGC, mutation, drift and inbreeding (see Materials and methods for details). The GC content at equilibrium (<it>p</it>*) depends on the effective population size (<it>N</it><sub><it>e</it></sub>), the mutational bias (<it>&#945;</it> = <it>u</it>/<it>v</it>, where <it>u </it>is the mutation rate from GC&#8594;AT and <it>v </it>the reverse mutation rate), the coefficient of BGC (<it>&#969;</it>), and the selfing rate (<it>S</it>) (see Materials and methods).</p>
				<p>In Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>, we plot the expected values of <it>p</it>* according to the scaled measure of the strength of BGC (4<it>N</it><sub><it>e</it></sub><it>&#969;</it> with different mutational biases (<it>&#945;</it>) and selfing rates (<it>S</it>)). In Figure <figr fid="F3">3a</figr>, we show that BGC has little effect on expected GC content in highly selfing populations (<it>S </it>= 0.99) compared to outcrossing populations (<it>S </it>= 0), regardless of the strength of BGC. This means that, in a highly selfing population, genomic regions with high recombination and thus high BGC (high <it>&#969;</it>) are expected to have a very similar GC content to genomic regions with low recombination and thus little or no BGC (low or null <it>&#969;</it>). Figure <figr fid="F3">3b</figr> shows that a slight difference between such genomic regions can be observed in a partial selfer, with <it>S </it>= 50%, for example. In <it>A. thaliana</it>, where <it>S </it>has been estimated to be approximately 0.99 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr></abbrgrp>, the average GC contents for introns, 5' flanking regions and 3' flanking regions are 32.1%, 32.7% and 32.5%, respectively, with an overall mean of approximately 32%. Thus, a mutational bias of 2 (that is, <it>u</it>/<it>v </it>= 2) describes well the average GC content of noncoding DNA (see Materials and methods for details). This suggests that the results obtained with <it>S </it>~1 and <it>&#945;</it> = 2, are probably the closest to reality in <it>A. thaliana</it>. With these parameters, Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr> shows that no effect of BGC on GC content is expected.</p>
				<fig id="F3">
					<title>
						<p>Figure 3</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>The effect of inbreeding on biased gene conversion (BGC)</p>
					</caption>
					<text>
						<p>The effect of inbreeding on biased gene conversion (BGC). <b>(a) </b>The consequences of BGC for GC content for outcrossing populations (<it>S </it>= 0) and highly self-crossing populations (<it>S </it>= 0.99). The results are shown with no mutational bias (<it>u/v </it>= 1) or with a mutational bias towards AT (<it>u/v </it>= 2). <b>(b) </b>The GC content expected for various selfing rates with no (4<it>N</it><sub><it>e</it></sub><it>&#969;</it> = 0), moderate (4<it>N</it><sub><it>e</it></sub><it>&#969;</it> = 1) or strong (4<it>N</it><sub><it>e</it></sub><it>&#969;</it> = 5) BGC. The mutational bias was set to 2. See Materials and methods for details of the model.</p>
					</text>
					<graphic file="gb-2004-5-7-r45-3"/>
				</fig>
				<p>In Figure <figr fid="F4">4</figr>, we plot the GC content for third codon positions of coding DNA (<it>GC<sub>3</sub></it>) and intron DNA (<it>GC<sub>3</sub></it>) against the rate of crossing over in <it>A. thaliana</it>. No significant correlations between <it>GC<sub>3</sub></it> and <it>GC</it><sub><it>i </it></sub>with recombination is observed. The correlation coefficients are very weak for both <it>GC<sub>3</sub></it> (<it>R</it><sub><it>s </it></sub>= -0.03 with <it>p </it>= 0.0002) and <it>GC</it><sub><it>i </it></sub>(<it>R</it><sub><it>s </it></sub>= -0.04 with <it>p </it>= 0.01). In both cases, less than 0.2% of the variability in GC content is explained by recombination. Again, we checked for a difference between centromeric regions and the remainder of the genome. In centromeric regions, <it>GC<sub>3</sub></it> = 41.4% and <it>GC</it><sub><it>i </it></sub>= 32.3%, and in the other regions <it>GC<sub>3</sub></it> = 43.3% and <it>GC</it><sub><it>i </it></sub>= 32.8%. Thus, we observe a 2% difference for <it>GC<sub>3</sub></it> and a 0.5% difference for <it>GC</it><sub><it>i</it></sub>. Again these differences have a <it>p </it>value lower than 0.05 (with a nonparametric Kolmogorov test) but these minor differences may have no biological meaning. In contrast, the corresponding difference in GC content in <it>Drosophila </it>is as large as 20% for coding and 5% for noncoding DNA <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp>. Our results from the genome analysis thus seem to be in agreement with theory.</p>
				<fig id="F4">
					<title>
						<p>Figure 4</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Genome-wide relationship between GC content and the rate of crossing over in <it>A. thaliana</it></p>
					</caption>
					<text>
						<p>Genome-wide relationship between GC content and the rate of crossing over in <it>A. thaliana</it>. <b>(a) </b>Silent DNA (<it>GC<sub>3</sub></it>); <b>(b) </b>intron DNA (<it>GC</it><sub><it>i</it></sub>). Each crossing-over bin contains approximately 10% of the genes of the dataset. See Materials and methods for details of the measurement of GC content and the rate of crossing over, in centimorgans per megabase (cM/MB). The results are the same if only genes with total intron size greater than 100 nucleotides (or with larger cutoff values) are included.</p>
					</text>
					<graphic file="gb-2004-5-7-r45-4"/>
				</fig>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Discussion</p>
			</st>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Base composition in inbreeders versus outcrossers</p>
				</st>
				<p>Our genome analysis suggests that recombination has little effect on base composition in <it>A. thaliana</it>. Neither codon usage bias nor GC content are correlated with the local rate of crossing over. Our theoretical work suggests that, first, selection on codon usage is not expected to vary with crossing over in highly inbred species and, second, that BGC is inefficient in highly inbred species. We also expect the global efficacy of selection on codon usage to be lower in inbred than in outbred species (see Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). Interestingly, the level of codon usage is low in <it>A. thaliana </it>and high in <it>Drosophila </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr></abbrgrp>, in agreement with the respective levels of outcrossing in these species. Subsequent comparisons of selfing versus outcrossing <it>Arabidopsis </it>species have, however, shown a less clear pattern <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
				<p>The budding yeast <it>Saccharomyces cerevisiae </it>is thought to have a high level of inbreeding in natural populations <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B42">42</abbr></abbrgrp>, and recent high estimates of the inbreeding coefficient from a population of the close relative <it>S. paradoxus </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B43">43</abbr></abbrgrp> suggest that long-term rates of selfing may be high. One might therefore expect a similar pattern in the genome of <it>S. cerevisiae </it>to that observed in <it>A. thaliana</it>. Although there is no evidence for a strong effect of recombination on the rate of protein evolution once gene expression is controlled for <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B44">44</abbr></abbrgrp>, recombination rates are strongly correlated with GC content in yeast <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, in contrast to <it>A. thaliana</it>, yeast has exceptionally high rates of recombination, approximately 100-fold higher than the multicellular model systems <it>Arabidopsis</it>, <it>Drosophila </it>and <it>C. elegans </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp>. This may counteract the reduction in effective recombination rates caused by inbreeding, to such a degree that the strength of BGC may be significant. Indeed, a study of nucleotide variation at a prion-like gene in <it>S. cerevisiae </it>estimated a similar effective rate of recombination to that in <it>Drosophila </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B45">45</abbr></abbrgrp>, despite possibly high rates of inbreeding in budding yeast.</p>
				<p>In <it>C. elegans</it>, the level of codon bias is intermediate between that of <it>A. thaliana </it>and <it>Drosophila </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr></abbrgrp>, and there is also a significant correlation between crossing over and GC content in this species <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp>. This is puzzling, in view of the low levels of genetic diversity (suggesting a low effective population size) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B46">46</abbr><abbr bid="B47">47</abbr></abbrgrp> and the high levels of linkage disequilibrium (suggesting very restricted recombination due to inbreeding) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B46">46</abbr></abbrgrp>. There are three possible explanations for this pattern: first, <it>C. elegans </it>is in fact a fairly outcrossing species, and has recently suffered a population bottleneck that reduced its levels of genetic variability; second, it has only become a self-fertilizing hemaphrodite relatively recently (this possibility cannot be excluded, since we lack knowledge of its close relatives) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B48">48</abbr></abbrgrp>; and third, our models of the evolution of base composition are in error. Further information on the evolutionary biology of <it>C. elegans </it>and its relatives is needed to solve this problem.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>How to explain variation in base composition</p>
				</st>
				<p>Base composition is fairly variable across the <it>A. thaliana </it>genome, both for codon bias and GC content (see Figure <figr fid="F5">5</figr>). Recombination does not seem to be a determinant of this variation in <it>A. thaliana</it>. What could be the other possible determinants? It is well known that codon bias has multiple determinants: gene expression and protein length, for instance <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr></abbrgrp>. Here, we find that a total of approximately 20% of the variability in <it>F</it><sub><it>op </it></sub>is explained by gene expression (measured by expressed sequence tag (EST) or massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) data) and protein length (S.I.W., C.B.K. Yau, M. Looseley, and B. Meyers, unpublished data), leaving 80% to be explained. The rate of nonsynonymous substitutions per site (<it>d</it><sub><it>N</it></sub>) seems to be another strong determinant of codon bias in <it>Drosophila </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, no large-scale dataset of orthologous pairs between <it>A. thaliana </it>and its close relatives (required to estimate <it>d</it><sub><it>N</it></sub>) is currently available, so we cannot assess the contribution of <it>d</it><sub><it>N </it></sub>to variability in <it>F</it><sub><it>op</it></sub>. Both the GC content at synonymous sites and at introns are likely to be influenced by genetic drift <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B49">49</abbr></abbrgrp>. The cumulative effects of mutation, selection (in the case of synonymous sites) and drift should generate random variation in GC content across the genome. This can be explored by looking whether the distribution of GC content over genes (see Figure <figr fid="F5">5</figr>) follows a binomial distribution. However, the differences between the expected values (estimated using the mean GC content) and the observed values were statistically significant for both <it>GC<sub>3</sub></it> and <it>GC</it><sub><it>i </it></sub>(data not shown). Variation in GC content does not seem to be fully explained by the effects of genetic drift.</p>
				<fig id="F5">
					<title>
						<p>Figure 5</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Distribution of base composition among genes in <it>A. thaliana</it></p>
					</caption>
					<text>
						<p>Distribution of base composition among genes in <it>A. thaliana</it>.</p>
					</text>
					<graphic file="gb-2004-5-7-r45-5"/>
				</fig>
				<p>This suggests that other factors, such as local differences in level of mutational bias, may contribute to the patterns of base composition in <it>A. thaliana</it>. If there are strong local effects driving the variation in GC, we would expect a strong positive correlation between <it>GC<sub>3</sub></it> and <it>GC</it><sub><it>i </it></sub>across genes, as observed in humans <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr><abbr bid="B50">50</abbr></abbrgrp> and <it>Drosophila </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B51">51</abbr></abbrgrp>. In contrast, we find a weak but significant negative correlation between <it>GC<sub>3</sub></it> and <it>GC</it><sub><it>i </it></sub>(<it>R</it><sub><it>s </it></sub>= -0.115; <it>p </it>&lt; 10<sup>-4</sup>); this is the case even when the correlation between <it>GC<sub>3</sub></it> and codon bias is factored out (<it>R</it><sub><it>s </it></sub>= -0.115; <it>p </it>&lt; 10<sup>-4</sup>). This suggests that local heterogeneity in mutational bias does not explain the variation in GC, and provides further evidence against a major effect of BGC in local GC variation in this species. The uncoupling of <it>GC<sub>3</sub></it> and <it>GC</it><sub><it>i</it></sub>, and the residual variation in GC content, may result from the action of selective constraint on some intron sequences, and differences in the mutational context of introns and synonymous sites.</p>
				<p>One important assumption of our analysis is that <it>A. thaliana </it>has been self-fertilizing for a sufficiently long time to remove any historical effects of recombination on base composition. This is questionable, given the fact that its closest known relatives are all obligate outcrosssers, including <it>A. lyrata </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B52">52</abbr></abbrgrp>. The most extreme case is complete cessation of outcrossing and complete relaxation of selection or BGC since the divergence of <it>A. thaliana </it>from <it>A. lyrata</it>. Under this assumption, Equation (4) given in Materials and methods implies that the present-day deviation of GC content of a genomic region of <it>A. thaliana </it>from the completely neutral value is equal to the initial deviation multiplied by exp(-(<it>u </it>+ <it>v</it>)<it>t</it>), where <it>t </it>is the time since divergence. This can be related to the expected DNA sequence divergence at completely unconstrained sites (after a Poisson correction for multiple hits), which is equal to 4<it>&#945;</it><it>vt</it>/(1 + <it>&#945;</it>) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B49">49</abbr></abbrgrp>. From the base composition of <it>A. thaliana </it>centromeric DNA (see Results), we can estimate <it>&#945;</it> as 2.12, assuming that this reflects mutational equilibrium. Given that the maximum silent-site divergence between the two species is about 0.2 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr></abbrgrp>, this implies that (<it>u </it>+ <it>v</it>)<it>t </it>= 0.23, so that the current deviation of <it>A. thaliana </it>GC content from the mutational equilibrium value is expected to be at least 80% of the value in <it>A. lyrata</it>. Conversely, this means that the maximal departure of GC content in a genomic region of <it>A. lyrata </it>from mutational equilibrium is at most a factor of exp((<it>u </it>+ <it>v</it>)<it>t</it>) times that for the corresponding region of <it>A. thaliana</it>, that is, about 25% greater. If <it>A. thaliana </it>has only been highly selfing for a proportion of the time since divergence, the value will be proportionately lower. This suggests that regional variation in GC content in <it>A. lyrata </it>should be relatively modest, a prediction which can be tested when more genomic information on <it>A. lyrata </it>is available.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>The influence of population subdivision</p>
				</st>
				<p>Our theoretical model of drift, selection and mutation considered only a single population, but it is known that <it>A. thaliana </it>has strong population structure <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr><abbr bid="B53">53</abbr></abbrgrp>. In addition, within-population silent nucleotide site diversity is very low compared with <it>A. lyrata</it>, but the diversity when pooled over samples from different localities is similar for the two species <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B53">53</abbr></abbrgrp>. This indicates that the effective population sizes of local populations are very low in <it>A. thaliana</it>, that migration among populations is limited, and that the effective population size determining the diversity among alleles randomly chosen from the species as a whole is not greatly reduced. The relatively high total diversity also suggests that local extinction and recolonization of populations does not play a major part in controlling genetic diversity <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B54">54</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
				<p>This raises the question of what measure of effective population size is appropriate for determining the base composition under BGC or weak selection. In addition to mutational bias, theory shows that base composition is controlled by the relative fixation probabilities of new mutations from GC to AT and vice versa <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr><abbr bid="B55">55</abbr></abbrgrp>. If migration is conservative (that is, the number of migrants entering each population equals the number leaving), with selection of the form of Equation (1) in Materials and methods, these fixation probabilities are controlled by the same <it>N</it><sub><it>e </it></sub>as is appropriate for the mean level of neutral diversity within demes, which is the same as for a population lacking any subdivision <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B56">56</abbr><abbr bid="B57">57</abbr><abbr bid="B58">58</abbr></abbrgrp>. With nonconservative migration, rigorous theoretical results are not available, but heuristic models and computer simulations suggest that fixation probabilities will be usually be lower than with conservative migration <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B59">59</abbr><abbr bid="B60">60</abbr><abbr bid="B61">61</abbr></abbrgrp>. These considerations imply that our conclusion, that fixation probabilities in <it>A. thaliana </it>will be closer to the neutral values than in <it>A. lyrata </it>for sites affected by BGC or weak selection, is either unaffected by population structure, or is a conservative one.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Conclusions</p>
			</st>
			<p>We have shown that inbreeding affects base composition by modulating the effectiveness of recombination. Inbreeding has also been shown to affect the dynamics of transposable elements <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr><abbr bid="B62">62</abbr><abbr bid="B63">63</abbr><abbr bid="B64">64</abbr></abbrgrp>. Taken together, these studies suggest that mating system can have a major effect on genome organization, particularly when the levels of inbreeding are high, and should be taken into account when interpreting patterns of molecular evolution. Other population parameters such as demographic history <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr><abbr bid="B65">65</abbr><abbr bid="B66">66</abbr></abbrgrp> and population subdivision <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B64">64</abbr></abbrgrp>, should also be considered when analyzing patterns of genome evolution.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Materials and methods</p>
			</st>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Genomic approach</p>
				</st>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Sequence data</p>
					</st>
					<p>We wanted to build an ACNUC database for the <it>A. thaliana </it>complete genome, because this allows the user to make complex queries <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B67">67</abbr></abbrgrp>. We required the <it>A. thaliana </it>complete genome to be in GenBank format to do this. As far as we know, the only release available in this format is release 1 (see <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B68">68</abbr></abbrgrp>). However, the gene predictions in this release may contain some errors. To circumvent this problem, we used 15,248 genes for which we had evidence for gene expression (EST or MPSS, see below) and whose intron-exon structure has not changed from release 1 to release 3, increasing the chance that they correspond to true genes with accurate annotations. Coding sequences and intron sequences of these genes were used for further analysis.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Recombination data</p>
					</st>
					<p>We used the rates of crossing over from a previous study <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B64">64</abbr></abbrgrp>. These were obtained by comparisons of genetic and physical maps for each chromosome arm. A polynomial was fitted to the data and the derivative of this polynomial curve was used to estimate the local rate of crossing over as a function of the position in the chromosome arm (for details and data see <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B64">64</abbr></abbrgrp> and <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B69">69</abbr></abbrgrp>). We could not use a sliding window approach to estimate the local rate of crossing over because of the scarcity of genetic markers.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Codon bias</p>
					</st>
					<p>This was estimated using the frequency of optimal codons (<it>F</it><sub><it>op</it></sub>). The list of optimal codons for <it>A. thaliana </it>was revised (S.I.W, C.B.K.Yau, M. Looseley, and B. Meyers, unpublished data) by identifying the optimal codons as those corresponding to the major tRNAs, whose cellular concentration was estimated from tRNA gene number following <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr><abbr bid="B70">70</abbr><abbr bid="B71">71</abbr></abbrgrp>. To check for a correlation between <it>F</it><sub><it>op </it></sub>and gene expression, we used EST data (as in <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr></abbrgrp>) and MPSS data (see <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B72">72</abbr></abbrgrp>) as estimates of the level of gene expression. <it>F</it><sub><it>op </it></sub>was computed with a modified version of a previously described program <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Theoretical approach</p>
				</st>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Hill-Robertson interference and inbreeding</p>
					</st>
					<p>Computer simulations were run following the reversible mutation, selection and drift multilocus model of <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp>. The model assumes equal rates of forward and back mutation, with a population mutation rate (4<it>N</it><sub><it>e</it></sub><it>u</it>) of 0.04. Simulations were run assuming a scaled selection intensity 4<it>N</it><sub><it>e</it></sub><it>s </it>of 1 and 4, with 1,000 mutable sites, and a population size of <it>N</it><sub><it>e </it></sub>= 100. Although this effective size is likely to be an underestimate of the true value for <it>A. thaliana</it>, the most important determinants of the level of interference are the product of the scaled mutation parameter 4<it>N</it><sub><it>e</it></sub><it>u </it>and the number of mutable sites, and the scaled selection coefficient 4<it>N</it><sub><it>e</it></sub><it>s </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp>. We modified the program to include the selfing rate <it>S</it>, where gametes are formed by random mating with probability (1 - <it>S</it>), and by self-fertilization with probability <it>S</it>. As in <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp>, selection was additive, with codominant heterozygous effects at individual sites (that is, the relative fitness at an individual locus is 1 + <it>s </it>for the heterozygote, and 1 and 1 + 2<it>s </it>for the alternative homozygotes).</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Biased gene conversion and inbreeding</p>
					</st>
					<p>BGC favours GC over AT in the context of recombination between polymorphic DNA sequences <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr></abbrgrp>. It is formally equivalent to meiotic drive, which acts only in heterozygtes to cause a departure from 1:1 Mendelian segregation of alleles <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B73">73</abbr></abbrgrp>. Assume that alternative GC and AT alleles at a site are neutral and that the ratio of GC:AT gametes from GC/AT heterozygotes is <it>k:k </it>- 1. In a random-mating population, the change in frequency <it>p </it>after one generation of an allele with GC at a given site is <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B74">74</abbr></abbrgrp>:</p>
					<p>&#916;<it>p </it>= 2<it>p</it>(1 - <it>p</it>)(2<it>k </it>- 1)&#160;&#160;&#160; (1)</p>
					<p>If the population is inbred, the frequency of heterozygotes is reduced to 2<it>p</it>(1 - <it>p</it>)(1 - <it>F</it>), where <it>F </it>is the inbreeding coefficient <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B73">73</abbr></abbrgrp>. At equilibrium under a mixture of selfing with probability <it>S </it>and random mating with probability 1 - <it>S</it>, <it>F </it>= <it>S</it>/(2 - <it>S</it>) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr></abbrgrp>. After taking selfing into account, Equation (1) becomes:</p>
					<p>&#916;<it>p </it>= <it>&#969;</it><it>p </it>(1 - <it>p</it>)(1 - <it>F</it>)&#160;&#160;&#160; (2)</p>
					<p>where <it>k </it>= 0.5(1 + <it>&#969;</it>).</p>
					<p>We must also consider the effects of genetic drift on finite inbred populations. The effect of genetic drift in a single isolated population is inversely proportional to the effective population size (<it>N</it><sub><it>e</it></sub>). Under a wide range of conditions, <it>N</it><sub><it>e </it></sub>for an inbred population is approximately equivalent to that for a random mating population with otherwise similar demography, divided by (1 + <it>F</it>) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr><abbr bid="B75">75</abbr><abbr bid="B76">76</abbr></abbrgrp>. When BGC, mutation and genetic drift are weak, their effects are additive and we can work directly with the Li-Bulmer formula for equilibrium, which is derived from diffusion theory <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr><abbr bid="B49">49</abbr><abbr bid="B55">55</abbr></abbrgrp>. The GC content at equilibrium is given by the approximate equation:</p>
					<p>
						<graphic file="gb-2004-5-7-r45-i1.gif"/>
					</p>
					<p>where <it>u </it>is the rate of mutation from GC&#8594;AT and <it>v </it>is the reverse mutation rate.</p>
					<p>If selection or BGC is completely relaxed after reaching an equilibrium (as the one given by Equation (3) for BGC), the process of change in GC content is described by the standard linear expression for change under mutation pressure <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B77">77</abbr></abbrgrp>. The new equilibrium GC content, <it>p</it>**, is equal to <it>v</it>/(<it>u </it>+ <it>v</it>), and the GC content at time <it>t</it>, <it>p</it><sub><it>t </it></sub>is given by:</p>
					<p><it>p</it><sub><it>t </it></sub>- <it>p</it>** = (<it>p* </it>- <it>p</it>**) exp(-(<it>u </it>+ <it>v</it>)<it>t</it>). &#160;&#160;&#160; (4)</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Additional data files</p>
			</st>
			<p>Additional data available with this article online, show the codon bias and base composition in <it>Arabidopsis thaliana </it>(Additional data file <supplr sid="s1">1</supplr>). It lists all genes analyzed in our analysis of base composition, combined with point estimates of recombination rate and base composition for each gene.</p>
			<suppl id="s1">
				<title>
					<p>Additional data file 1</p>
				</title>
				<caption>
					<p>The codon bias and base composition in <it>Arabidopsis thaliana </it></p>
				</caption>
				<text>
					<p>The codon bias and base composition in <it>Arabidopsis thaliana </it></p>
				</text>
				<file name="gb-2004-5-7-r45-s1.txt">
					<p>Click here for additional data file</p>
				</file>
			</suppl>
		</sec>
	</bdy>
	<bm>
		<ack>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Acknowledgements</p>
				</st>
				<p>We are grateful to Blake Meyers for sharing unpublished MPSS data and to Deborah Charlesworth for helpful comments on the manuscript. G.M. is a European Union Marie Curie postdoctoral fellow. B.C. is supported by a Royal Society Research Professorship, and S.W. was supported by a Commonwealth Fellowship and an NSERC postdoctoral fellowship.</p>
			</sec>
		</ack>
		<refgrp>
			<bibl id="B1">
				<title>
					<p>Comparison of human genetic and sequence-based physical maps.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Yu</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhao</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Fan</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Jang</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mungall</snm>
						<fnm>AJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Deloukas</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Olsen</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Doggett</snm>
						<fnm>NA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ghebranious</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Broman</snm>
						<fnm>KW</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Weber</snm>
						<fnm>JL</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nature</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>409</volume>
				<fpage>951</fpage>
				<lpage>953</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/35057185</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11237020</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B2">
				<title>
					<p>Human SNP variability and mutation rate are higher in regions of high recombination.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Lercher</snm>
						<fnm>MJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hurst</snm>
						<fnm>LD</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Trends Genet</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>18</volume>
				<fpage>337</fpage>
				<lpage>340</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02669-0</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">12127766</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B3">
				<title>
					<p>Patterns of diversity and recombination along chromosome 1 of maize (<it>Zea mays </it>ssp. <it>mays </it>L.).</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Tenaillon</snm>
						<fnm>MI</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sawkins</snm>
						<fnm>MC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Anderson</snm>
						<fnm>LK</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Stack</snm>
						<fnm>SM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Doebley</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gaut</snm>
						<fnm>BS</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>162</volume>
				<fpage>1401</fpage>
				<lpage>1413</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12454083</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B4">
				<title>
					<p>Selection at linked sites in the partial selfer <it>Caenorhabditis elegans</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Cutter</snm>
						<fnm>AD</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Payseur</snm>
						<fnm>BA</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Mol Biol Evol</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>20</volume>
				<fpage>665</fpage>
				<lpage>673</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/molbev/msg072</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12679551</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B5">
				<title>
					<p>The evolution of isochores.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Eyre-Walker</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hurst</snm>
						<fnm>LD</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nat Rev Genet</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>2</volume>
				<fpage>549</fpage>
				<lpage>555</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/35080577</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11433361</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B6">
				<title>
					<p>Does recombination improve selection on codon usage? Lessons from nematode and fly complete genomes.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Marais</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mouchiroud</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Duret</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>98</volume>
				<fpage>5688</fpage>
				<lpage>5692</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.091427698</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11320215</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B7">
				<title>
					<p>Biased gene conversion: implications for genome and sex evolution.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Marais</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Trends Genet</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>19</volume>
				<fpage>330</fpage>
				<lpage>338</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00116-1</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">12801726</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B8">
				<title>
					<p>Integrating genomics, bioinformatics, and classical genetics to study the effects of recombination on genome evolution.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Birdsell</snm>
						<fnm>JA</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Mol Biol Evol</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>19</volume>
				<fpage>1181</fpage>
				<lpage>1197</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12082137</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B9">
				<title>
					<p>Interactions between natural selection, recombination and gene density in the genes of <it>Drosophila</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Hey</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kliman</snm>
						<fnm>RM</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>160</volume>
				<fpage>595</fpage>
				<lpage>608</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11861564</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B10">
				<title>
					<p>Intron size and natural selection.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Carvalho</snm>
						<fnm>AB</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Clark</snm>
						<fnm>AG</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nature</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<volume>401</volume>
				<fpage>344</fpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/43827</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10517631</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B11">
				<title>
					<p>The correlation between intron length and recombination in drosophila. Dynamic equilibrium between mutational and selective forces.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Comeron</snm>
						<fnm>JM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kreitman</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>156</volume>
				<fpage>1175</fpage>
				<lpage>1190</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11063693</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B12">
				<title>
					<p>Transposons but not retrotransposons are located preferentially in regions of high recombination rate in <it>Caenorhabditis elegans</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Duret</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Marais</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Biemont</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>156</volume>
				<fpage>1661</fpage>
				<lpage>1669</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11102365</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B13">
				<title>
					<p>Recombination rate and the distribution of transposable elements in the <it>Drosophila melanogaster </it>genome.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Rizzon</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Marais</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gouy</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Biemont</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genome Res</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>12</volume>
				<fpage>400</fpage>
				<lpage>407</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1101/gr.210802. Article published online before print in February 2002</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11875027</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B14">
				<title>
					<p>On the abundance and distribution of transposable elements in the genome of <it>Drosophila melanogaster</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Bartolome</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Maside</snm>
						<fnm>X</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Charlesworth</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Mol Biol Evol</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>19</volume>
				<fpage>926</fpage>
				<lpage>937</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12032249</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B15">
				<title>
					<p>The proteins of linked genes evolve at similar rates.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Williams</snm>
						<fnm>EJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hurst</snm>
						<fnm>LD</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nature</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>407</volume>
				<fpage>900</fpage>
				<lpage>903</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/35038066</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11057667</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B16">
				<title>
					<p>Linkage limits the power of natural selection in <it>Drosophila</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Betancourt</snm>
						<fnm>AJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Presgraves</snm>
						<fnm>DC</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>99</volume>
				<fpage>13616</fpage>
				<lpage>13620</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.212277199</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12370444</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B17">
				<title>
					<p>A neutral explanation for the correlation of diversity with recombination rates in humans.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Hellmann</snm>
						<fnm>I</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ebersberger</snm>
						<fnm>I</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ptak</snm>
						<fnm>SE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Paabo</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Przeworski</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Am J Hum Genet</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>72</volume>
				<fpage>1527</fpage>
				<lpage>1535</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1086/375657</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12740762</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B18">
				<title>
					<p>Evidence for co-evolution of gene order and recombination rate.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Pal</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hurst</snm>
						<fnm>LD</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nat Genet</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>33</volume>
				<fpage>392</fpage>
				<lpage>395</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/ng1111</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12577060</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B19">
				<title>
					<p>The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Smith</snm>
						<fnm>JM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Haigh</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genet Res</source>
				<pubdate>1974</pubdate>
				<volume>23</volume>
				<fpage>23</fpage>
				<lpage>25</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">4407212</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B20">
				<title>
					<p>The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Charlesworth</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Morgan</snm>
						<fnm>MT</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Charlesworth</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>1993</pubdate>
				<volume>134</volume>
				<fpage>1289</fpage>
				<lpage>1303</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8375663</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B21">
				<title>
					<p>The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>McVean</snm>
						<fnm>GA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Charlesworth</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>155</volume>
				<fpage>929</fpage>
				<lpage>944</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10835411</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B22">
				<title>
					<p>Neutral effect of recombination on base composition in <it>Drosophila</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Marais</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mouchiroud</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Duret</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genet Res</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>81</volume>
				<fpage>79</fpage>
				<lpage>87</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1017/S0016672302006079</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">12872909</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B23">
				<title>
					<p>Recombination drives the evolution of GC-content in the human genome.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Meunier</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Duret</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Mol Biol Evol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>21</volume>
				<fpage>984</fpage>
				<lpage>990</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/molbev/msh070</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14963104</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B24">
				<title>
					<p>The effect of background selection against deleterious mutations on weakly selected linked variants.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Charlesworth</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genet Res</source>
				<pubdate>1994</pubdate>
				<volume>63</volume>
				<fpage>213</fpage>
				<lpage>227</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">8082838</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B25">
				<title>
					<p>Recombination and mammalian genome evolution.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Eyre-Walker</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</source>
				<pubdate>1993</pubdate>
				<volume>252</volume>
				<fpage>237</fpage>
				<lpage>243</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">8394585</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B26">
				<title>
					<p>GC-content evolution in mammalian genomes: the biased gene conversion hypothesis.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Galtier</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Piganeau</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mouchiroud</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Duret</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>159</volume>
				<fpage>907</fpage>
				<lpage>911</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11693127</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B27">
				<title>
					<p>Evolutionary rate of a gene affected by chromosomal position.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Perry</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ashworth</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Curr Biol</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<volume>9</volume>
				<fpage>987</fpage>
				<lpage>989</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80430-8</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">10508587</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B28">
				<title>
					<p>Hill-Robertson interference in <it>Drosophila melanogaster</it>: reply to Marais, Mouchiroud and Duret.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Kliman</snm>
						<fnm>RM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hey</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genet Res</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>81</volume>
				<fpage>89</fpage>
				<lpage>90</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1017/S0016672302006067</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">12872910</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B29">
				<title>
					<p>Population genetic structure and outcrossing rate of <it>Arabidopsis thaliana </it>(L.) Heynh.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Abbott</snm>
						<fnm>RJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gomes</snm>
						<fnm>MF</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Heredity</source>
				<pubdate>1989</pubdate>
				<volume>62</volume>
				<fpage>411</fpage>
				<lpage>418</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B30">
				<title>
					<p>The effect of breeding systems and pollination vectors on the genetic variation of small plant populations within an agricultural landscape.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Berge</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nordal</snm>
						<fnm>I</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hestmark</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>OIKOS</source>
				<pubdate>1998</pubdate>
				<volume>81</volume>
				<fpage>17</fpage>
				<lpage>29</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B31">
				<title>
					<p>Linkage disequilibrium gene trees and selfing: an ancestral recombination graph with partial self-fertilization.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Nordborg</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>154</volume>
				<fpage>923</fpage>
				<lpage>929</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10655241</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B32">
				<title>
					<p>Breeding systems and genome evolution.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Charlesworth</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wright</snm>
						<fnm>SI</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Curr Opin Genet Dev</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>11</volume>
				<fpage>685</fpage>
				<lpage>690</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00254-9</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">11682314</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B33">
				<title>
					<p>Codon usage and gene function are related in sequences of <it>Arabidopsis thaliana</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Chiapello</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lisacek</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Caboche</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Henaut</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Gene</source>
				<pubdate>1998</pubdate>
				<volume>209</volume>
				<fpage>GC1</fpage>
				<lpage>GC38</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00671-9</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">9583944</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B34">
				<title>
					<p>Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in <it>Caenorhabditis</it>, <it>Drosophila</it>, and <it>Arabidopsis</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Duret</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mouchiroud</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<volume>96</volume>
				<fpage>4482</fpage>
				<lpage>4487</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.96.8.4482</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10200288</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B35">
				<title>
					<p>Rates and patterns of molecular evolution in inbred and outbred <it>Arabidopsis</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Wright</snm>
						<fnm>SI</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lauga</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Charlesworth</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Mol Biol Evol</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>19</volume>
				<fpage>1407</fpage>
				<lpage>1420</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12200469</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B36">
				<title>
					<p>Natural selection on synonymous sites is correlated with gene length and recombination in <it>Drosophila</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Comeron</snm>
						<fnm>JM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kreitman</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Aguade</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<volume>151</volume>
				<fpage>239</fpage>
				<lpage>249</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9872963</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B37">
				<title>
					<p>Molecular evolution in a multisite nearly neutral mutation model.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Tachida</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Mol Evol</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>50</volume>
				<fpage>69</fpage>
				<lpage>81</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10654261</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B38">
				<title>
					<p>Codon usage bias and tRNA abundance in <it>Drosophila</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Moriyama</snm>
						<fnm>EN</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Powell</snm>
						<fnm>JR</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Mol Evol</source>
				<pubdate>1997</pubdate>
				<volume>45</volume>
				<fpage>514</fpage>
				<lpage>523</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9342399</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B39">
				<title>
					<p>tRNA gene number and codon usage in the <it>C. elegans </it>genome are co-adapted for optimal translation of highly expressed genes.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Duret</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Trends Genet</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>16</volume>
				<fpage>287</fpage>
				<lpage>289</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02041-2</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">10858656</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B40">
				<title>
					<p>Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant <it>Arabidopsis thaliana</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<cnm>Arabidopsis Genome Initiative</cnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nature</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>408</volume>
				<fpage>796</fpage>
				<lpage>815</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/35048692</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11130711</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B41">
				<title>
					<p>Biased conversion as the primary function of recombination.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Bengtsson</snm>
						<fnm>BO</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genet Res</source>
				<pubdate>1986</pubdate>
				<volume>47</volume>
				<fpage>77</fpage>
				<lpage>80</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">3957041</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B42">
				<title>
					<p>Distribution and sequence analysis of a novel Ty3-like element in natural <it>Saccharomyces paradoxus </it>isolates.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Fingerman</snm>
						<fnm>EG</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Dombrowski</snm>
						<fnm>PG</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Francis</snm>
						<fnm>CA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sniegowski</snm>
						<fnm>PD</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Yeast</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>20</volume>
				<fpage>761</fpage>
				<lpage>70</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/yea.1005</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12845602</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B43">
				<title>
					<p>Population genetics of the wild yeast <it>Saccharomyces paradoxus</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Johnson</snm>
						<fnm>LJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Koufopanou</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Goddard</snm>
						<fnm>MR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hetherington</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schafer</snm>
						<fnm>SM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Burt</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>166</volume>
				<fpage>43</fpage>
				<lpage>52</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15020405</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B44">
				<title>
					<p>Does the recombination rate affect the efficiency of purifying selection? The yeast genome provides a partial answer.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Pal</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Papp</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hurst</snm>
						<fnm>LD</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Mol Biol Evol</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>18</volume>
				<fpage>2323</fpage>
				<lpage>2326</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11719582</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B45">
				<title>
					<p>Molecular population genetics and evolution of a prion-like protein in <it>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Jensen</snm>
						<fnm>MA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>True</snm>
						<fnm>HL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Chernoff</snm>
						<fnm>YO</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lindquist</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>159</volume>
				<fpage>527</fpage>
				<lpage>535</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11606530</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B46">
				<title>
					<p>Single nucleotide polymorphisms in wild isolates of <it>Caenorhabditis elegans</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Koch</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>van Luenen</snm>
						<fnm>HG</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>van der Horst</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Thijssen</snm>
						<fnm>KL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Plasterk</snm>
						<fnm>RH</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genome Res</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>10</volume>
				<fpage>1690</fpage>
				<lpage>1696</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1101/gr.GR-1471R</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11076854</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B47">
				<title>
					<p>Levels of DNA polymorphism vary with mating system in the nematode genus <it>Caenorhabditis</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Graustein</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gaspar</snm>
						<fnm>JM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Walters</snm>
						<fnm>JR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Palopoli</snm>
						<fnm>MF</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>161</volume>
				<fpage>99</fpage>
				<lpage>107</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12019226</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B48">
				<title>
					<p>Genomes: a helpful cousin for our favourite worm.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Felix</snm>
						<fnm>MA</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Curr Biol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>14</volume>
				<fpage>R75</fpage>
				<lpage>R77</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">14738755</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B49">
				<title>
					<p>Models of nearly neutral mutations with particular implications for nonrandom usage of synonymous codons.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Li</snm>
						<fnm>WH</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Mol Evol</source>
				<pubdate>1987</pubdate>
				<volume>24</volume>
				<fpage>337</fpage>
				<lpage>345</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">3110426</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B50">
				<title>
					<p>The compositional evolution of vertebrate genomes.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Bernardi</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Gene</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>259</volume>
				<fpage>31</fpage>
				<lpage>43</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00441-8</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">11163959</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B51">
				<title>
					<p>Mutation pressure, natural selection, and the evolution of base composition in <it>Drosophila</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Akashi</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kliman</snm>
						<fnm>RM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Eyre-Walker</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetica</source>
				<pubdate>1998</pubdate>
				<volume>102-103</volume>
				<fpage>49</fpage>
				<lpage>60</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1023/A:1017078607465</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">9720271</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B52">
				<title>
					<p>Comparative evolutionary analysis of chalcone synthase and alcohol dehydrogenase loci in <it>Arabidopsis</it>, <it>Arabis</it>, and related genera (Brassicaceae).</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Koch</snm>
						<fnm>MA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Haubold</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mitchell-Olds</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Mol Biol Evol</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>17</volume>
				<fpage>1483</fpage>
				<lpage>1498</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11018155</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B53">
				<title>
					<p>Genetic variation within and among populations of <it>Arabidopsis thaliana</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Bergelson</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Stahl</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Dudek</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kreitman</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>1998</pubdate>
				<volume>148</volume>
				<fpage>1311</fpage>
				<lpage>1323</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9539444</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B54">
				<title>
					<p>Effects of metapopulation processes on measures of genetic diversity.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Pannell</snm>
						<fnm>JR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Charlesworth</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>355</volume>
				<fpage>1851</fpage>
				<lpage>1864</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">11205346</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1098/rstb.2000.0740</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B55">
				<title>
					<p>The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Bulmer</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>1991</pubdate>
				<volume>129</volume>
				<fpage>897</fpage>
				<lpage>907</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">1752426</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B56">
				<title>
					<p>Some invariant properties of a geographically structured finite population: distribution of heterozygotes under irreversible mutation.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Maruyama</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genet Res</source>
				<pubdate>1972</pubdate>
				<volume>20</volume>
				<fpage>141</fpage>
				<lpage>149</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">4654234</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B57">
				<title>
					<p>Geographical invariance in population genetics.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Nagylaki</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Theor Biol</source>
				<pubdate>1982</pubdate>
				<volume>99</volume>
				<fpage>159</fpage>
				<lpage>172</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">7169795</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B58">
				<title>
					<p>Fixation indices in subdivided populations.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Nagylaki</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>1998</pubdate>
				<volume>148</volume>
				<fpage>1325</fpage>
				<lpage>1332</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9539445</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B59">
				<title>
					<p>A diffusion approximation for selection and drift in a subdivided population.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Cherry</snm>
						<fnm>JL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wakeley</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>163</volume>
				<fpage>421</fpage>
				<lpage>428</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12586727</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B60">
				<title>
					<p>Fixation probability and time in subdivided populations.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Whitlock</snm>
						<fnm>MC</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>164</volume>
				<fpage>767</fpage>
				<lpage>779</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12807795</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B61">
				<title>
					<p>Selection and drift in subdivided populations: a straightforward method for deriving diffusion approximations and applications involving dominance selfing and local extinctions.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Roze</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rousset</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>165</volume>
				<fpage>2153</fpage>
				<lpage>2166</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14704194</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B62">
				<title>
					<p>Population dynamics of an Ac-like transposable element in self- and cross-pollinating <it>Arabidopsis</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Wright</snm>
						<fnm>SI</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Le</snm>
						<fnm>QH</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schoen</snm>
						<fnm>DJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bureau</snm>
						<fnm>TE</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>158</volume>
				<fpage>1279</fpage>
				<lpage>1288</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11454774</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B63">
				<title>
					<p>Transposable element number in mixed mating populations.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Morgan</snm>
						<fnm>MT</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genet Res</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>77</volume>
				<fpage>261</fpage>
				<lpage>275</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1017/S0016672301005067</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">11486509</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B64">
				<title>
					<p>Effects of recombination rate and gene density on transposable element distributions in <it>Arabidopsis thaliana</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Wright</snm>
						<fnm>SI</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Agrawal</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bureau</snm>
						<fnm>TE</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genome Res</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>13</volume>
				<fpage>1897</fpage>
				<lpage>1903</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12902382</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B65">
				<title>
					<p>A genome-wide departure from the standard neutral model in natural populations of <it>Drosophila</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Andolfatto</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Przeworski</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>156</volume>
				<fpage>257</fpage>
				<lpage>268</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10978290</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B66">
				<title>
					<p>Testing models of selection and demography in <it>Drosophila simulans</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Wall</snm>
						<fnm>JD</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Andolfatto</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Przeworski</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>162</volume>
				<fpage>203</fpage>
				<lpage>216</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12242234</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B67">
				<title>
					<p>ACNUC - a portable retrieval system for nucleic acid sequence databases: logical and physical designs and usage.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Gouy</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gautier</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Attimonelli</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lanave</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>di Paola</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Comput Appl Biosci</source>
				<pubdate>1985</pubdate>
				<volume>1</volume>
				<fpage>167</fpage>
				<lpage>172</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">3880341</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B68">
				<title>
					<p>Entrez Genome.</p>
				</title>
				<url>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?db=Genome</url>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B69">
				<title>
					<p>Supplementary data for Wright <it>et al.</it>: Effects of recombination rate and gene density on transposable element distributions in <it>Arabidopsis thaliana</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<url>http://www.genome.org/cgi/content/full/13/8/1897/DC1</url>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B70">
				<title>
					<p>Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Ikemura</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Mol Biol Evol</source>
				<pubdate>1985</pubdate>
				<volume>2</volume>
				<fpage>13</fpage>
				<lpage>34</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">3916708</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B71">
				<title>
					<p>Restricted wobble rules for eukaryotic genomes.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Percudani</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Trends Genet</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>17</volume>
				<fpage>133</fpage>
				<lpage>135</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02208-3</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">11314654</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B72">
				<title>
					<p>Directory of MPSS data pages.</p>
				</title>
				<url>http://mpss.udel.edu</url>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B73">
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Hartl</snm>
						<fnm>DL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Clark</snm>
						<fnm>AG</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Principles of Population Genetics</source>
				<publisher>Sunderland, MA: Sinauer</publisher>
				<edition>3</edition>
				<pubdate>1997</pubdate>
				<fpage>542</fpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B74">
				<title>
					<p>Evolution of a finite population under gene conversion.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Nagylaki</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source>
				<pubdate>1983</pubdate>
				<volume>80</volume>
				<fpage>6278</fpage>
				<lpage>6281</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">6578508</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B75">
				<title>
					<p>On the theory of partially inbreeding finite populations. I. Partial selfing.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Pollak</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>1987</pubdate>
				<volume>117</volume>
				<fpage>353</fpage>
				<lpage>360</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">3666446</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B76">
				<title>
					<p>Effective population size and population subdivision in demographically structured populations.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Laporte</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Charlesworth</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genetics</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>162</volume>
				<fpage>501</fpage>
				<lpage>519</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12242257</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B77">
				<title>
					<p>On the genetic basis of variation and heterogeneity of DNA base composition.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Sueoka</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source>
				<pubdate>1962</pubdate>
				<volume>48</volume>
				<fpage>582</fpage>
				<lpage>592</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">13918161</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
		</refgrp>
	</bm>
</art>
