<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>cc2471</ui>
   <ji>CCJ</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Poster presentation</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy &#8211; a comparison of three methods: Ciaglia Blue Rhino, PercuTwist and Griggs' Guidewire Dilation Forceps (GWDF)</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1">
               <snm>Schiefner</snm>
               <fnm>J</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A2">
               <snm>Magnusson</snm>
               <fnm>K</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A3">
               <snm>Zaune</snm>
               <fnm>U</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A4">
               <snm>Vester</snm>
               <fnm>E</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1">
               <p>Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Duesseldorf, Germany</p>
            </ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Critical Care</source>
         <supplement>
            <title>
               <p>24th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine</p>
            </title>
            <note>Meeting abstracts</note>
            <url>http://ccforum.com/supplements/notes/cc-8-s1-info.pdf</url>
         </supplement>
         <conference>
            <title>
               <p>24th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine</p>
            </title>
            <location>Brussels, Belgium</location>
            <date-range>30 March &#8211; 2 April 2004</date-range>
            <url>http://www.intensive.org</url>
         </conference>
         <issn>1364-8535</issn>
         <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
         <volume>8</volume>
         <issue>Suppl 1</issue>
         <fpage>P4</fpage>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/cc2471</pubid>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>15</day>
               <month>3</month>
               <year>2004</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
   </fm>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Introduction</p>
         </st>
         <p>In contrast to conventional surgical tracheostomy, percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) in different variants is spreading rapidly in intensive care units today. On two intensive care units &#8211; cardiological and surgical&#8211;anaesthesiological &#8211; we performed a comparative investigation of three PDT methods in a prospective randomized study with an emphasis on clinical utility and safety.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Methods</p>
         </st>
         <p>Thirty-one patients (age 64 &#177; 13 [mean &#177; SD]) were enrolled, PDT were performed in three groups, 10 Ciaglia Blue Rhino (Cook), 10 PercuTwist (R&#252;sch) &#8211; a device employing a screw with a hydrophilic coating and 11 GWDF &#8211; using Griggs' specially designed dilational forceps (Portex). Duration of intervention, oxygenation parameters, blood loss and further complications peri-interventionally and postinterventionally were recorded and compared.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Results</p>
         </st>
         <p>We found significant differences in the duration of procedures: Blue Rhino 5.9 &#177; 3.7 min, PercuTwist 11.7 &#177; 9.35 min, GWDF 3.3 &#177; 1.65 min (<it>P </it>&lt; 0.02). Two PercuTwist procedures proved technically difficult &#8211; insufficient penetration depth of the Percu Twist device and formation of a pre-tracheal via falsa, successful tracheostoma placement was achieved only after a procedural switch to Blue Rhino. One of these cases led to significant blood loss. Pre-interventional and postinterventional values for Hb were 10 &#177; 1.8 g/dl and 9.9 &#177; 1.2 g/dl in the Blue Rhino group, 10.4 &#177; 1.8 g/dl and 10.3 &#177; 1.9 g/dl in the PercuTwist, and 9.8 &#177; 0.8 g/dl and 9.57 &#177; 1.4 g/dl in the GWDF group (n.s.). Oxygenation remained unchanged early after intervention with a tendency towards a better PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2 </sub>in the GWDF group. Three cases of cartilage fracture were recorded. We saw no severe lasting desaturation episodes. We found no stomal infections and no other life-threatening events. Surgical intervention was never required. Mortality in all groups was 42% with no procedure-related deaths. Thirteen patients have been permanently decanulated.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Conclusion</p>
         </st>
         <p>The three methods investigated in this study show comparable feasibility, clinical utility, lack of severe complications and margin of patient safety under the conditions of a secondary academic teaching hospital. However, the PercuTwist method revealed technical limitations in particular in the presence of a wide tracheocutaneous distance. Shortest intervention durations were achieved using the GWDF. To provide evidence of relevant differences &#8211; especially regarding long-term outcome &#8211; further comparative studies are indispensable.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
</art>
