<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>cc1807</ui>
   <ji>CCJ</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Meeting abstract</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>An audit of re-admission to intensive care after initial recovery from pulmonary resection: is it worthwhile?</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1">
               <snm>Pilling</snm>
               <fnm>JE</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A2">
               <snm>Martin-Ucar</snm>
               <fnm>AE</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A3">
               <snm>Waller</snm>
               <fnm>DA</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1">
               <p>Department of Thoracic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK</p>
            </ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Critical Care</source>
         <supplement>
            <title>
               <p>19th Spring Meeting of the Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists</p>
            </title>
            <sponsor>
               <note>Supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Bayer plc</note>
            </sponsor>
            <note>Meeting abstracts</note>
         </supplement>
         <conference>
            <title>
               <p>19th Spring Meeting of the Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists</p>
            </title>
            <location>Cambridge, UK</location>
            <date-range>21 June 2002</date-range>
         </conference>
         <issn>1364-8535</issn>
         <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
         <volume>6</volume>
         <issue>Suppl 2</issue>
         <fpage>3</fpage>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/cc1807</pubid>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>9</day>
               <month>7</month>
               <year>2002</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
   </fm>
   <meta>
      <classifications>
         <classification type="BMC" subtype="old_arx_id">cc-6-s2-3</classification>
      </classifications>
   </meta>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Objective</p>
         </st>
         <p>To audit the outcome of patients admitted to a general intensive care unit (ICU) from a thoracic high dependency unit (HDU) after pulmonary resection.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Methods</p>
         </st>
         <p>A retrospective case note review of 28 consecutive patients (22 male, six female; median age, 66 years [range, 48&#8211;80 years]) admitted to the ICU following initial recovery on an HDU after pulmonary resection, in a 3-year period, in a single surgeon thoracic surgical practice.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Results</p>
         </st>
         <p>ICU and 6-month mortalities were 47% (13 patients) and 64% (18 patients), respectively. Need for mechanical ventilation (<it>P</it> = 0.006) and subsequent renal support (<it>P</it> = 0.05) were predictors of hospital mortality on multivariate analysis. All four patients who required both ventilation and renal support died. Only two of 17 patients (12%) who required mechanical ventilation were alive at 6 months (<it>P</it> = 0.002). Age, sex, preoperative pulmonary function, extent of resection, diagnosis, need for reoperation and inotropic requirements were not predictors of poor outcome. Patients who died in the ICU (<it>n</it> = 13) stayed for longer (mean, 17.6 days versus 5.3 days; <it>P</it> = 0.04) and at a higher average cost per patient (&#163;21,992 versus &#163;5300; <it>P</it> = 0.04) than those who survived (<it>n</it> = 15).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Conclusions</p>
         </st>
         <p>Mechanical ventilation for subsequent respiratory complications after initial recovery from lung resection is generally not worthwhile.</p>
         <tbl id="T1">
            <title>
               <p/>
            </title>
            <caption>
               <p/>
            </caption>
            <tblbdy cols="3">
               <r>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>Hospital mortality</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>6-month mortality</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c cspan="3">
                     <hr/>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="left">
                     <p>Age</p>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c indent="1" ca="left">
                     <p>&lt; 70 years</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>47% (9 of 19)</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>63% (12 of 19)</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c indent="1" ca="left">
                     <p>> 70 years</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>44% (4 of 9)</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>67% (6 of 9)</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="left">
                     <p>FEV1%</p>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c indent="1" ca="left">
                     <p>&lt; 70% predicted</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>27% (3 of 11)</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>64% (7 of 11)</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c indent="1" ca="left">
                     <p>> 70% predicted</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>59% (10 of 17)</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>65% (11 of 17)</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="left">
                     <p>Histology</p>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c indent="1" ca="left">
                     <p>Malignant</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>43% (10 of 23)</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>65% (15 of 23)</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c indent="1" ca="left">
                     <p>Benign</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>60% (3 of 5)</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>60% (3 of 5)</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="left">
                     <p>Mechanical ventilation</p>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c indent="1" ca="left">
                     <p>Yes</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>76% (13 of 17)</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>88% (15 of 17)</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c indent="1" ca="left">
                     <p>No</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>0% (0 of 11)</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>27% (3 of 11)</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="left">
                     <p>Renal support required</p>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c indent="1" ca="left">
                     <p>Yes</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>73% (11 of 15)</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>87% (13 of 15)</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c indent="1" ca="left">
                     <p>No</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>15 % (2 of 13)</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>38% (5 of 13)</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
            </tblbdy>
            <tblfn>
               <p>FEV1%, forced expiratory volume in 1 s as a percentage of forced vital capacity.</p>
            </tblfn>
         </tbl>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
</art>
