Acetaminophen toxicity: suicidal vs accidental

cc1475 CCJ Research Acetaminophen toxicity: suicidal vs accidental Gyamlani G Geeta Parikh R Chirag chirag.parikh@UCHSC.edu

Fellow, Division of Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Clinical Instructor, Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA

Critical Care 1364-8535 2002 6 2 155 159 See related Commentary: http://ccforum.com/content/6/2/108 10.1186/cc1475 11983042 12 12 2001 18 1 2002 24 1 2002 31 1 2002 21 2 2002 2002 Gyamlani and Parikh, licensee BioMed Central Ltd acetaminophen toxicity epidemiology hepatotoxicity therapeutic misadventure

Abstract

Introduction

Acetaminophen toxicity, which can lead to hepatotoxicity, is a burden on our health care system and contributes significantly to intensive care unit admissions and cost of hospitalization. The aim of our study was to determine the epidemiology of various types of acetaminophen poisoning and analyze their outcome compared with their admission characteristics.

Methods

We identified 93 consecutive patients, hospitalized for acetaminophen toxicity over a 52-month period from 1996 to 1999 in our urban county hospital. Retrospective case-control analysis was carried out using the data obtained from the medical records.

Results

Acetaminophen accounted for 7.5% of all cases of poisoning admitted during this period. Of the 93 patients, 80 were classified as suicidal and 13 had accidentally poisoned themselves in an attempt to relieve pain. The ratio of females to males was found to be 2:1. Of the 93 patients studied, 88 were admitted to the intensive care unit for initial 24–48 hours of monitoring. Peak acetaminophen levels were higher in the suicidal overdose group (mean 121.7 ± 97.0 mg/l vs 64.5 ± 61.8 mg/l, P < 0.05) than in the accidental group. In spite of this, peak aminotransferase levels >1000 IU/l were more often seen in the latter (39% vs 12%, P < 0.05). Hepatic coma and death were seen more often in the accidental overdose group (15% vs 0%, P < 0.05). Interestingly chronic alcohol abuse was also more frequent in the accidental overdose category (39% vs 18%, P = 0.05).

Discussion

Although the peak acetaminophen level in the suicidal group was significantly higher, cases of therapeutic misadventure had higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Peak acetaminophen levels correlate poorly with hepatic dysfunction, morbidity and mortality.

Conclusion

We recommend that the patients with suicidal acetaminophen overdose, without any concomitant poisoning, can safely managed on the medical floors.

cc-6-2-155

Introduction

Acetaminophen gained widespread popularity in the 1960s as a less toxic, analgesic antipyretic agent than aspirin. Ironically, acetaminophen is now the second leading cause of toxic drug ingestions in the United States [1]. Acetaminophen toxicity is thus a real burden on our health care system, and hepatotoxicity due to acetaminophen overdose has become an important problem [2,3].

There are two distinct clinical syndromes described in literature. One is the 'garden variety', wherein the patients ingested large amounts of acetaminophen with a suicidal intent [4,5]. The other pattern is seen in chronic alcoholics who ingest smaller amounts of acetaminophen in an attempt to relieve pain [2,6,7,8]. Some cases of acetaminophen overdose have been described as parasuicidal, where the attempted suicide is more of a gesture than an act of lethal intent. The aim of our study was to determine the epidemiology of various types of acetaminophen poisoning and analyze their outcome compared with their admission characteristics.

Methods

This study was conducted at Nassau University Medical Center (East Meadow, NY, USA) which represents an urban county hospital. Computer associated search was undertaken of all admission records from January 1996 to April 1999. The records of all the patients with a discharge diagnosis of acetaminophen overdose were analyzed. Patients who were not admitted to the hospital after being assessed in the emergency room were excluded from this study. We included patients who had a history of acetaminophen ingestion reported by either the patient or the family. We went on to confirm that the patient had substantial acetaminophen ingestion by history, blood acetaminophen level >10 mg/l, or serum aminotransferase level >1000 IU/l. Two out of three of these conditions had to be met for a case to be included in our study. Patients who had elevated serum aminotransferase levels but in whom substantial acetaminophen ingestion could not be adequately confirmed were excluded from the study. Chronic alcohol abuse was defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition (DSM-IV) criteria [9].

All of the patients with suicidal overdose were admitted to the intensive care unit. For the patients with accidental acetaminophen ingestion, the triage was based on their clinical condition. There was a standard management plan for all the patients, as suggested by the National Poison Control Center. Most of the patients were observed for 24 hours in the intensive care unit before being transferred to the medical floor.

The following information was recorded: age; sex; race; acetaminophen dose; reason for ingestion; history of alcohol abuse or concurrent intoxication; time to presentation to the emergency room since ingestion; and N-acetylcysteine therapy. The laboratory data included peak acetaminophen level, peak aminotransferase level, prothrombin time, serum bilirubin, and serum creatinine. Using the International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision (ICD-9) code [10], the total number of cases of poisonings admitted during the same time period was determined to calculate the prevalence of acetaminophen toxicity.

Statistical analysis

The database used for recording the information was Microsoft Access 6.0. Quantitative data was analyzed using the Students unpaired t-test and the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Analysis of qualitative data was done using the Fisher exact test and the chi-square test. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 6.0.

Results

We identified 100 patients who had evidence of acetaminophen toxicity according to our criteria. Four patients had to be excluded, because acetaminophen did not appear to be the culprit for their clinical state. Three others were excluded because they presented with another comorbid condition that could have been responsible for their hepatic profile. None of the patients who were excluded died during their hospitalization.

Acetaminophen accounted for 7.5% of all cases of poisoning admitted during this period. Of the 93 patients, 80 were classified as suicidal based on psychiatric evaluation, and 13 had accidentally poisoned themselves in an attempt to relieve pain. We could not identify any patients with parasuicidal acetaminophen toxicity. The causes of chronic pain in the accidental overdose group were toothache, chronic backache, or headache. Eighty-eight of the 93 patients were admitted to the intensive care unit for first 24–48 hours monitoring.

Table 1 shows that the patients with suicidal ingestion tended to be younger than the accidental group. Female to male ratio was 2:1, with a preponderance of whites in both the groups. Chronic alcohol intake was more prevalent in the accidental overdose subgroup.

Table 1

Characteristics of patients with acetaminophen overdose

Characteristic

Accidental overdose (n = 13)

Suicidal overdose (n = 80)

P value

Age (years)

Mean ± SD

35.4 ± 21.84

27 ± 15

< 0.05

Median

Range

1–88

12–75

Sex (n)

0.06

Female

Male

Race (n)

Asian

African American

Hispanic

White

Chronic alcohol abuse (n [%])

5 (39)

15 (18)

0.10

Concurrent intoxication (n [%])

3 (23)

36 (45)

0.20

NS, not significant.

It is evident that, although the peak acetaminophen level was higher in the suicidal subgroup (mean 121.7 ± 97.0 vs 64.5 ± 61.8 mg/l, P < 0.05), a peak aminotransferase level >1000 IU/l was seen more frequently in the patients with accidental overdose (39% vs 12%, P < 0.05) (Table 2). The renal function was overall unaffected and not significantly different between the two groups (data not shown). Morbidity and mortality was higher in the accidental subgroup. There were only two deaths, both in the accidental group; one of whom had a history of chronic alcohol abuse. N-acetylcysteine therapy was given to 62% of the patients in the accidental group, compared to 73% in the suicidal overdose group. The hospital stay was higher in the accidental overdose group (mean 6.4 ± 6.1 days vs 3.9 ± 2.7 days, P < 0.01).

Table 2

Clinical variables seen in the suicidal and accidental overdose groups

Variable

Accidental overdose (n = 13)

Suicidal overdose (n = 80)

P value

Presentation >24 hours after overdose (n/n studied [%])

6/9 (66)

7/55 (13)

< 0.001

Peak acetaminophen (mg/l)

< 0.050

Mean ± SD

64.5 ± 61.8

121.7 ± 97.0

Median

Range

0–184

0–439

Peak acetaminophen <10 mg/l (n [%])

5 (38)

8 (10)

Peak ALT (IU/l)

0.070

Mean ± SD

1386 ± 1918

580 ± 1836

Median

187

Range

30–5584

30–10356

Peak AST (IU/l)

0.070

Mean ± SD

1330 ± 2697

504 ± 1708

Median

114

Range

30–9794

30–10773

Peak aminotransferase >1000 IU/l (n [%])

5 (39)

10 (12)

< 0.050

Peak prothrombin time (seconds)

< 0.050

Mean ± SD

15.6 ± 7.4

12.7 ± 2.1

Median

Range

12–35

12–25

Peak serum bilirubin (mg/dl)

< 0.050

Mean

3.8 ± 5.5

1.3 ± 1.3

Median

Range

1–5

1–10

N-acetylcysteine therapy (n [%])

8 (62)

59 (73)

0.500

Hepatic coma (n [%])

2 (15)

0 (0)

< 0.050

Death (n [%])

2 (15)

0 (0)

< 0.050

Length of stay in hospital (days)

< 0.010

Mean

6.4 ± 6.1

3.9 ± 2.7

Median

Range

1–17

Discussion

This study did not take the dose of acetaminophen ingested into consideration due to several reasons. Accurate dose estimations could not be made in the accidental group because many of these patients had inadvertent ingestion of acetaminophen in more than one form over several days. The other problem we faced was that some patients in the accidental group were unaware of the presence of acetaminophen in some over-the-counter drugs. About 40% of the patients in the suicidal group could not give an accurate history about the dose of acetaminophen ingested. A substantial number of patients in the suicidal group were drowsy and sedated due to other concomitant ingestions. Moreover, most of the studies in the literature fail to demonstrate any clear-cut, direct relationship between acetaminophen dose and hepatotoxicity [6]. Low acetaminophen levels (<10 mg/l) were found in 38% patients in the accidental group, compared to 10% in the suicidal overdose group. This is probably because these patients presented late, and they had ingested small doses over a prolonged period.

Surprisingly, the morbidity and mortality were higher in the accidental overdose group than the suicidal group (15% vs 0%, P < 0.05). There are two reasons for this. First, these patients present late and sometimes the diagnosis is delayed, both of which hinder optimal antidotal treatment. The second reason could be the increased chronic alcohol use among the accidental group (39% vs 12%, P < 0.05). However, the data on the amount of alcohol, duration of intake, or interval between intake of alcohol and acetaminophen are subject to recall bias, withholding of information by the patient, or non-responsive state of the patient on presentation.

The presumed basis for the potentiation of acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity by chronic ethanol ingestion has been amply discussed [11,12,13,14]. Elegant studies performed in the early 1970s [15] established that acetaminophen, taken in therapeutic doses, is metabolized by the liver through two pathways. Most of the drug (80–90%) is conjugated with either glucuronic acid or sulphates, yielding the nontoxic conjugates that are excreted by the kidney. A small proportion (5%) is metabolized to a reactive electrophilic intermediate by the cytochrome P-450 system. This metabo-lite is rendered nontoxic by conjugation with glutathione to form mercapturic acid and related conjugates that are also excreted in the urine. If the drug is taken in excessive doses, an augmented amount is converted by cytochrome P-450 to the highly reactive, toxic intermediate metabolite [15,16]. It then may reach a level that overwhelms the protective mechanism of glutathione conjugation and ultimately, through covalent binding to hepatocyte proteins, leads to hepatocellular necrosis [17].

Therapeutic doses of acetaminophen have the potential of producing liver damage if they are associated with circumstances that enhance the activity of the P-450 system leading to increased production of toxic metabolite, or that interfere with the protective mechanism by depleting the available glu-tathione. Ethanol can potentiate damage due to both of these reasons [11,12,13,14].

In the present study 6/9 (66%) patients in the accidental overdose group and 7/55 (13%) in the suicidal overdose group presented to the emergency room more than 24 hours after the overdose. N-acetylcysteine therapy was given to 62% of the patients in the accidental group, compared to 73% patients in the suicidal group. Treatment with N-acetylcysteine has been very successful in preventing or ameliorating hepatic injury after suicidal acetaminophen overdose. However, the benefit of N-acetylcysteine in the syndrome of acetaminophen injury as a therapeutic misadventure is not clearly defined. The final outcome in the case of accidental overdose is dependent on a multitude of factors, and thus a large number of cases will be required for multivariate analysis to identify the role of N-acetylcys-teine. As the efficacy of N-acetylcysteine as an antidote decreases after eight hours, the treatment must be started immediately following all potentially toxic doses of acetaminophen (>10 g). However, a large retrospective trial indicated that N-acetylcysteine therapy decreased the incidence of hepatotoxicity when administered up to 24 hours post overdose [18]. Patients, who have an increased susceptibility to acetaminophen toxicity, particularly alcoholics, should be considered for N-acetylcysteine therapy at plasma levels that are half of those indicated in the standard graph [19,20]. In addition, patients with accidental overdose acquired over a number of hours should be still considered for treatment, because in these cases plasma levels are unreliable in predicting hepatotoxicity.

Our study also showed that, although patients with suicidal overdose had higher peak acetaminophen levels than the accidental overdose group, the peak aminotransferase level (>1000 IU/L) was more often seen in the accidental overdose group (39% vs 12%, P < 0.05). The suicidal overdose patients with high levels of liver enzymes more often had a history of chronic alcohol abuse and they presented late. Similar results have been reported in an Australian study [21]. Even when acute hepatic failure develops because of suicidal overdose of acetaminophen, these patients have a good prognosis in terms of liver transplantation and death. [4,21,22,23]. In fact, none of our patients in the suicidal overdose group died or had to be referred for transplantation. In contrast to this, in the accidental overdose group 2/13 patients developed fulminant hepatic failure leading to hepatic coma and ultimately to death. Thus peak acetaminophen levels correlate poorly with hepatic dysfunction, morbidity and mortality.

The number of days of hospitalization was higher in the accidental group. There are numerous studies which have shown that the total cost of treating a patient in the intensive care unit in the US is approximately $25,000–35,000 per day [24,25]. It is a tradition in many hospitals in the country to admit patients with acetaminophen overdose to critical care units. In our study, out of the 80 patients in the suicidal group, 75 were admitted to the intensive care unit, whereas all the 13 patients in the accidental overdose group were admitted to this unit. Because of their benign clinical course, we recommend that patients with suicidal acetaminophen overdose can be safely managed on the medical floors unless there is a history of chronic alcohol abuse or other concomitant poisonings. In our hospital this would translate to a cost saving of at least $500,000 per year.

Conclusion

In summary, acetaminophen poisoning continues to remain a significant reason for hospital admissions among young adults. Peak acetaminophen levels correlate poorly with the clinical course. The admission of the patients to the intensive care unit or ward should be determined by the degree of derangement of their clinical parameters. Patients with suicidal overdose and no history of chronic alcohol use do not need be admitted to the intensive care unit. This excludes patients for whom there is any doubt about the history of chronic alcohol abuse and those who have accidentally poisoned themselves. These are the patients who have an unfavorable clinical course and should be monitored in a critical care setting.

Competing interests

None declared.

1992 Annual report of the american association of the poison control centers toxic exposure surveillance system. Litowitz TL Holm KC Clancy C Schmitz BF Clark LR Oderda GM Am J Emerg Med 1999 17 435 487 10496515 Apparent potentiation of acetaminophen hepatotoxicity by alcohol. Licht H Seeff LB Zimmerman HJ Ann Intern Med 1980 92 511 7362155 Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity. Black M Annu Rev Med 1984 35 577 593 10.1146/annurev.me.35.020184.003045 6372672 Acute liver failure. Hughes RD Wendon J Gimson AES Gut 1991 (September suppl) S86 S91 Paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning. Vale JA Proudfoot AT Lancet 1995 346 547 552 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91385-8 7658783 Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity in alcoholics: a therapeutic misadventure. Seef LB Cuccherina BA Zimmerman HJ Adler E Benjamin SB Ann Intern Med 1986 104 399 404 3511825 Association of acetaminophen hepatotoxicity with fasting and ethanol use. Whitcomb DC Block GD JAMA 1994 272 1845 1850 10.1001/jama.272.23.1845 7990219 Acetaminophen (paracetamol) hepatotoxicity with regular intake of alcohol: analysis of instances of therapeutic misadventure. Zimmerman HJ Maddrey WC Hepatology 1995 22 767 773 7657281 American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association 4 1994 World Health Organization International classification of diseases, injuries, and causes of death. Ninth Revision (ICD-9). Geneva: World Health Organization, 1987 Effects of alcohol on other hepatotoxins. Zimmerman HJ Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1986 1 3 15 Hepatic effects of acetaminophen: enhanced toxicity in alcoholics. Maddrey WC J Clin Gastroenterol 1987 9 180 185 3553308 Acetaminophen, alcohol and cytochrome P450. Black M Raucey J Ann Intern Med 1986 104 427 429 3946982 Molecular mechanism of the hepatotoxicity caused by acetaminophen. Nelson SD Semin Liver Dis 1990 10 267 278 2281334 Acetaminophen induced hepatic necrosis II: role of covalent binding <it>in vivo</it>. Jollow DJ Mitchell JR Potter WZ Davis DC Gillette JR Brodie BB J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1973 187 195 202 4746327 Zimmerman HJ Hepatotoxicity: adverse effects of drugs and other chemicals on the liver. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1978 Acetaminophen induced hepatic necrosis IV: protective role of glu-tathione. Mitchell JR Jollow DJ Potter WZ Gillette JR Brodie BB J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1973 187 195 202 4746327 Efficacy of oral N-acetylcysteine in the treatment of acetaminophen overdose. Smilkstein MJ Knapp GL Kulig KW Rumack BH N Engl J Med 1988 319 1557 1562 3059186 Recent developments in the management of paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning. Janes J Routlege PA Drug Safety 1992 7 170 177 1503665 Paracetamol poisoning: an update. Ferner R Prescribers J 1993 33 45 50 Hepatotoxicity from paracetamol self-poisoning in western Sydney: a continuing challenge. Brotodihardjo AD Batey RG Farrell GC Byth K Med J Aust 1992 157 382 385 1447987 A 7-year experience of severe acetaminophen induced hepatotoxicity (1987–1993). Makin AJ Wendon J Williams R Gas-troenterology 1995 209 1907 1916 Serious paracetamol poisoning and the results of liver transplantation. Mutimer DJ Ayres RCS Neuberger JM Davies MH Holguin J Buckels JA Mayer AD McMaster P Elias E Gut 1994 35 809 814 8020810 The use of predictions to identify candidates for intermediate care units: implications for intensive care use and cost. Zimmerman JE Wagner DP Knaus WA Chest 1995 108 490 499 7634889 Value and cost of teaching hospitals: a prospective, multicenter, inception cohort study. Zimmerman JE Shortell SM Knaus WA Rousseau DM Wagner DP Gillies RR Draper EA Devers K Crit Care Med 1993 21 1432 1442 8403950