<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>bcr825</ui>
   <ji>BCJ</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Oral presentation</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Biopsied in the USA</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1">
               <snm>Davies</snm>
               <fnm>R</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1">
               <p>Breast Care Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK</p>
            </ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Breast Cancer Res</source>
         <supplement>
            <title>
               <p>Symposium Mammographicum 2004</p>
            </title>
            <note>Meeting abstracts</note>
         </supplement>
         <conference>
            <title>
               <p>Symposium Mammographicum 2004</p>
            </title>
            <location>Edinburgh, UK</location>
            <date-range>19th &#8211; 20th July 2004</date-range>
         </conference>
         <issn>1465-5411</issn>
         <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
         <volume>6</volume>
         <issue>Suppl 1</issue>
         <fpage>P6</fpage>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/bcr825</pubid>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>14</day>
               <month>7</month>
               <year>2004</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
   </fm>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p/>
         </st>
         <p>Fine needle aspirate and core biopsy are well established techniques in the UK for achieving preoperative diagnoses for palpable and impalpable breast lesions. Since the mid-1990s the number of units using Mammotome has steadily increased; as yet no randomised trial comparing vacuum-assisted biopsy against automated core biopsy has been published. However, a critical review of currently available literature has shown a significant decrease in the high-risk lesion underestimate rate and a nonsignificant decrease in the ductal carcinoma <it>in situ </it>underestimate rate when compared with published data on 14 G core biopsy <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>. The aim of this bursary was to visit two centres in the US and briefly review the next generation of 'post mammotome' biopsy devices that are in routine use and likely to be launched in the UK. As none of these devices have been subject to a randomised trial this report is a subjective evaluation of these techniques by a UK practitioner working in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme and Symptomatic Breast Imaging service.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <refgrp>
         <bibl id="B1">
            <title>
               <p>Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a critical review</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hoornjte</snm>
                  <fnm>LE</fnm>
               </au>
               <etal/>
            </aug>
            <source>Eur J Cancer</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>39</volume>
            <fpage>1676</fpage>
            <lpage>1683</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00421-0</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12888361</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
      </refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>
