<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>1758-2652-11-S1-P199</ui>
   <ji>1758-2652</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Poster presentation</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Therapeutic drug monitoring of new formulation Kaletra in pregnancy</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1" ca="yes">
               <snm>Jackson</snm>
               <fnm>V</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A2">
               <snm>Else</snm>
               <fnm>LJ</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A3">
               <snm>Khoo</snm>
               <fnm>SH</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A4">
               <snm>Gibbons</snm>
               <fnm>SE</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A5">
               <snm>Brennan</snm>
               <fnm>M</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A6">
               <snm>Connor</snm>
               <fnm>EO</fnm>
               <insr iid="I3"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A7">
               <snm>Boyle</snm>
               <fnm>N</fnm>
               <insr iid="I4"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A8">
               <snm>Fleming</snm>
               <fnm>C</fnm>
               <insr iid="I4"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A9">
               <snm>Coulter-Smith</snm>
               <fnm>S</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A10">
               <snm>Lambert</snm>
               <fnm>J</fnm>
               <insr iid="I5"/>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1">
               <p>The Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I2">
               <p>Department of Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I3">
               <p>The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I4">
               <p>University College Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I5">
               <p>The Rotunda Hospital, The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital and University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland</p>
            </ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Journal of the International AIDS Society</source>
         <supplement>
            <title>
               <p>Abstracts of the Ninth International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection</p>
            </title>
            <note>Meeting abstracts &#8211; A single PDF containing all abstracts in this Supplement is available <a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/files/pdf/1758-2652-11-S1-full.pdf">here</a>.</note>
            <url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1758-2652-11-S1-info.pdf</url>
         </supplement>
         <conference>
            <title>
               <p>Ninth International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection</p>
            </title>
            <location>Glasgow, UK</location>
            <date-range>9&#8211;13 November 2008</date-range>
            <url>http://www.hivdrugtherapy.org</url>
         </conference>
         <issn>1758-2652</issn>
         <pubdate>2008</pubdate>
         <volume>11</volume>
         <issue>Suppl 1</issue>
         <fpage>P199</fpage>
         <url>http://www.jiasociety.org/content/11/S1/P199</url>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1758-2652-11-S1-P199</pubid>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>10</day>
               <month>11</month>
               <year>2008</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
      <cpyrt>
         <year>2008</year>
         <collab>Jackson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab>
      </cpyrt>
   </fm>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Purpose of the study</p>
         </st>
         <p>The new LPV/r tablet formulation has significant patient benefits over the old LPV/r SGC, including a lack of food/fluid restrictions, no need for refrigeration and a reduced daily pill count. However, like many antiretroviral drugs, the pharmacokinetics of the new LPV/r tablet during pregnancy is poorly understood. Here we report total and unbound LPV plasma concentrations during pregnancy and at post-partum.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Methods</p>
         </st>
         <p>In this prospective, open-labelled study, pregnant HIV-positive patients received the LPV/r tablet formulation as part of their routine pre-natal care. Demographic and clinical data were collected and LPV plasma (total) and ultrafiltrate (unbound) concentrations were determined in the first (T1) and/or second (T2) and/or third (T3) trimester using HPLC-MS/MS. Post-partum (PP) sampling was performed where applicable. Ante-partum and post-partum PK parameters were compared using a one-way ANOVA (for independent data sets) and a paired t-test (for paired data).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Summary of results</p>
         </st>
         <p>From January 2007, 33 women were enrolled in the study; 31/33 received LPV/r tablet at the standard dose of 2 tablets BID. The remaining two patients were prescribed 4 tablets OD and 3 tablets BID, respectively. 30/33 women initiated LPV/r treatment during pregnancy. Median gestation at initiation was 25 weeks. 3/33 women were receiving HAART prior to pregnancy. Median baseline CD4 count was 349 (14&#8211;836). Median baseline viral load was 9,100 copies/ml (&lt;50&#8211;267,408).</p>
         <p>LPV/r (total and unbound) concentrations were determined in 1/33 (T1); 10/33 (T2); 29/33 (T3) and 8/33 (PP) (&#8804;12 weeks) patients. 2/10 patients at T2 and 3/29 patients at T3 fell below the recommended LPV MEC (&lt;1000 ng/ml), respectively. Median total LPV concentrations at T2 and T3 were 2770 ng/ml (1759&#8211;4202) and 3371 ng/ml (2331&#8211;4310), respectively; and were significantly lower relative to LPV concentrations observed at PP [5352 ng/ml (2667&#8211;7293)] (p = 0.042). Equally, in a paired analysis of eight patients (T3 vs. PP), total LPV concentrations were significantly reduced at T3 vs. PP (p = 0.021). However, no significant difference was observed in the % unbound LPV at T3 [0.93% (0.71&#8211;1.10)] vs. PP [0.96% (0.81&#8211;1.19)].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Conclusion</p>
         </st>
         <p>Standard dosage of LPV/r during pregnancy resulted in adequate therapeutic drug levels in the majority women examined. In addition, the similarities in the percentage of unbound LPV in the third trimester versus post-partum suggest that the standard dose of LPV/r is appropriate during pregnancy. Further research into this is required.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
</art>
