<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
	<ui>1756-0500-6-7</ui>
	<ji>1756-0500</ji>
	<fm>
		<dochead>Short Report</dochead>
		<bibl>
			<title>
				<p>Detection of extended spectrum &#946;-lactamase in <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp. isolated from two tertiary care hospitals in Bangladesh</p>
			</title>
			<aug>
				<au id="A1"><snm>Begum</snm><fnm>Shahanara</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>begumshahanara34@yahoo.com</email></au>
				<au id="A2" ca="yes"><snm>Salam</snm><fnm>Md Abdus</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>drsalamrmc@yahoo.com</email></au>
				<au id="A3"><snm>Alam</snm><fnm>Kh Faisal</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>faisal_imm@yahoo.com</email></au>
				<au id="A4"><snm>Begum</snm><fnm>Nurjahan</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>nizias2010@gmail.com</email></au>
				<au id="A5"><snm>Hassan</snm><fnm>Pervez</fnm><insr iid="I4"/><email>hassanpru1@gmail.com</email></au>
				<au id="A6"><snm>Haq</snm><fnm>Jalaluddin Ashraful</fnm><insr iid="I5"/><email>jahaq54@yahoo.com</email></au>
			</aug>
			<insg>
				<ins id="I1"><p>Department of Microbiology, Green Life Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh</p></ins>
				<ins id="I2"><p>Department of Microbiology, Rajshahi Medical College, Rajshahi, 6000, Bangladesh</p></ins>
				<ins id="I3"><p>Department of Microbiology, Pabna Medical College, Pabna, Bangladesh</p></ins>
				<ins id="I4"><p>Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, 6205, Bangladesh</p></ins>
				<ins id="I5"><p>Department of Microbiology, Ibrahim Medical College, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh</p></ins>
			</insg>
			<source>BMC Research Notes</source>
			<issn>1756-0500</issn>
			<pubdate>2013</pubdate>
			<volume>6</volume>
			<issue>1</issue>
			<fpage>7</fpage>
			<url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/6/7</url>
			<xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1756-0500-6-7</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">23289861</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
		</bibl>
		<history><rec><date><day>9</day><month>9</month><year>2012</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>4</day><month>1</month><year>2013</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>5</day><month>1</month><year>2013</year></date></pub></history>
		<cpyrt><year>2013</year><collab>Begum et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
		<kwdg>
			<kwd>
				<it>Pseudomonas</it> spp</kwd>
			<kwd>Antimicrobial susceptibility</kwd>
			<kwd>ESBL</kwd>
		</kwdg>
		<abs>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Abstract</p>
				</st>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Background</p>
					</st><p>Extended spectrum &#223;-lactamases (ESBLs) represent a major group of lactamases responsible for resistance, mostly produced by gram-negative bacteria, to newer generations of &#223;-lactam drugs currently being identified in large numbers worldwide. The present study was undertaken to see the frequency of ESBL producing <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp. isolated from six hundred clinical specimens (wound, pus, aural, urine, sputum, throat and other swabs) collected over a period of three years from two tertiary care hospitals in Bangladesh.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Findings</p>
					</st><p>Aerobic bacterial culture was performed on aseptically collected swabs and only growth of <it>Pseudomonas</it> was considered for further species identification and ESBL production along with serotyping of <it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</it>. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out using the Kirby-Bauer agar diffusion method and ESBL production was detected on Mueller Hinton agar by double-disk synergy technique using Amoxicillin-Clavulanic acid with Ceftazidime, Cefotaxime, Ceftriaxone and Aztreonam. Culture yielded 120 <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp<it>.</it> and 82 of them were biochemically characterized for species. <it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</it> was found to be the predominant (90.2%) species. Of 82 isolates tested for ESBL, 31 (37.8%) were ESBL positive with 29 (93.5%) as <it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa,</it> the remaining 2 (6.5%) were <it>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</it> and <it>Ralstonia pickettii.</it> Antibiogram revealed Imipenem as the most effective drug (93.3%) among all antimicrobials used against <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp. followed by Aminoglycosides (63.7%).</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Conclusion</p>
					</st><p>ESBL producing <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp. was found to be a frequent isolate from two tertiary care hospitals in Bangladesh, showing limited susceptibility to antimicrobials and decreased susceptibility to Imipenem in particular, which is a matter of great concern.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
		</abs>
	</fm>
	<bdy>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Background</p>
			</st><p>The worldwide emergence of multi-drug resistant bacterial strains is a growing concern, especially infections caused by <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp. and <it>P. aeruginosa</it> in particular. <it>P. aeruginosa</it> is an opportunistic pathogen with innate resistance to many antibiotics and disinfectants including anti-pseudomonal Penicillins, Ceftazidime, Carbapenems, Aminoglycosides and Ciprofloxacin <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Infections due to <it>P. aeruginosa</it> are seldom encountered in healthy adults; but in the last two decades, the organism has become increasingly recognized as the etiological agent in patients with impaired immune defenses <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Pseudomonads are more versatile than <it>Enterobacteriaceae</it> in acquiring drug resistance by various mechanisms. The production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) confers resistance at various levels to expanded spectrum Cephalosporins <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. These enzymes are encoded by different genes located on either chromosomes or plasmids <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. ESBL-producing bacteria may not be detectable by the routine disk diffusion susceptibility test, leading to inappropriate use of antibiotics and treatment failure.</p><p>Several different methods have been suggested for the detection of ESBLs in clinical isolates <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, such as disk approximation or double disk synergy, modified double disc test (MDDT), CLSI phenotypic confirmatory method, E-test ESBL strips, three dimensional test, Vitek system, etc. While each of these tests has merit, none are able to detect all of the ESBLs encountered. Disk approximation or double disk synergy is one of the currently available and most widely used techniques for the detection of ESBLs <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>Although bacterial resistance to the beta-lactam drugs and the mechanisms leading to this resistance have become a primary focus for clinicians and researchers, until recently, only a few studies have been carried out to detect ESBL bacteria in Bangladesh. Further, routine ESBL phenotype screening is not yet practiced in Bangladesh. The present study was conducted with an aim to detect the prevalence of ESBL-producing <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp. isolated from clinical samples of two tertiary care hospitals in Bangladesh.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Findings</p>
			</st>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Materials and methods</p>
				</st>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Materials</p>
					</st><p>The study examined 600 swabs including from wounds (n =200), pus (n =110), urine (n =100), aural (n =80), sputum (n =50), throat (n =50), umbilicus and conjunctiva (n =10) taken from patients of different ages and sex attending at Rajshahi Medical College Hospital (RMCH) and BIRDEM Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh from July 2000 to September 2003. Laboratory works were performed at the Microbiology laboratory of Rajshahi Medical College, BIRDEM hospital and the Molecular Biology laboratory of the Institute of Biological Sciences (IBSc), Rajshahi University. The study was ethically approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the Institute of Biological Sciences (IBSc), Rajshahi University and written informed consent was obtained from patients or a legal guardian in the case of minors.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Culture and identification of species and serotypes</p>
					</st><p>Following aseptic collection, swabs were routinely inoculated onto Blood and MacConkey agar media. The plates were incubated overnight aerobically at 37&#176;C and then checked for bacterial growth. <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp. were identified by their colony morphology, staining characters, pigment production, motility and other relevant biochemical tests as per standard methods of identification. Cetrimide agar medium was used as selective media for subculturing <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp. Isolates were categorized into different species based on their distinct biochemical and pigment production characteristics <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
						</abbrgrp> and serotyping of <it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</it> was done using commercially available (Denka Seiken Co. Ltd., Japan) polyvalent I, II and III group specific antisera against 14 O antigens.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Antimicrobial susceptibility testing</p>
					</st><p>Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp. was done by the Kirby-Bauer agar diffusion method using <it>P. aeruginosa</it> ATCC 27853 as the control strain. Commercially available (Hi-Media) antimicrobial disks of Piperacillin (PIP 100 &#956;g), Amikacin (AMI 30 &#956;g), Carbinicillin (CARB 100 &#956;g), Ceftazidime (CAZ 30 &#956;g), Ceftriaxone (CRO 30 &#956;g), Cefotaxime (CTX 30 &#956;g), Tetracycline (TET 30 &#956;g), Gentamycin (GEN 10 &#956;g), Ciprofloxacin (CIP 5 &#956;g), Tobramycin (TOB 10 &#956;g), Imipenem (IMP 10 &#956;g) and Netilmycin (NET 30 &#956;g) were used on Mueller Hinton agar (MHA, Hi-Media) to test susceptibility. Zone of inhibition was recorded as <it>Sensitive</it> or <it>Resistant</it> according to CLSI guidelines <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Detection of ESBL by double disc diffusion synergy method</p>
					</st><p>ESBL production in <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp. was detected by double disk synergy test (DDST) as described by Jarlier <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>. Mueller Hinton agar was inoculated with standardized inoculum (corresponding to 0.5 McFarland tube) using sterile cotton swab. An Augmentin (20 &#956;g Amoxicillin and 10 &#956;g of Clavulanic acid- AMC) disk was placed in the center of the plate and test disks of 3rd generation Cephalosporins (Ceftazidime- CAZ 30 &#956;g, Ceftriaxone-CRO 30 &#956;g, Cefotaxime-CTX 30 &#956;g) and Aztreonam (ATM 30 &#956;g) disks were placed at 20 mm distance (center to center) from the Amoxicillin-Clavulanic acid disk prior to incubation. The plate was incubated overnight at 35&#176;C. Enhancement of the zone of inhibition of any one of the four drug disks toward Amoxicillin-Clavulanic acid suggested the presence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Results</p>
			</st><p>Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr> shows the frequency distribution of <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp<it>.</it> with the number of ESBL-positive cases. Of 82 strains of <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp<it>.</it> tested for ESBL, 31 (37.8%) were found as ESBL-positive with the highest frequency (75%) from urine, followed by throat (50%), pus (35%), aural (33.3%) wound (26.3%) and sputum (25%).</p>
			<table id="T1">
				<title>
					<p>Table 1</p>
				</title>
				<caption>
					<p>
						<b>Rate of detection of </b><b>
							<it>Pseudomonas </it>
						</b><b>spp. and ESBL-positive strains from clinical specimens</b>
					</p>
				</caption>
				<tgroup align="left" cols="3">
					<colspec align="center" colname="c1" colnum="1" colwidth="1*"/>
					<colspec align="center" colname="c2" colnum="2" colwidth="1*"/>
					<colspec align="center" colname="c3" colnum="3" colwidth="1*"/>
					<thead valign="top">
						<row rowsep="1">
							<entry align="center" colname="c1">
								<p>
									<b>Specimens (n)</b>
								</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2">
								<p>
									<b>
										<it>Pseudomonas </it>
									</b><b>spp</b><b>
										<it>. </it>
									</b><b>n (%)</b>
								</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3">
								<p>
									<b>ESBL-positive n (%)</b>
								</p>
							</entry>
						</row>
					</thead>
					<tbody valign="top">
						<row rowsep="1">
							<entry align="center" colname="c1">
								<p>Wound swab (200)</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2">
								<p>19 (9.5)</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3">
								<p>5 (26.3)</p>
							</entry>
						</row>
						<row rowsep="1">
							<entry align="center" colname="c1">
								<p>Pus (110)</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2">
								<p>20 (18.2)</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3">
								<p>7 (35)</p>
							</entry>
						</row>
						<row rowsep="1">
							<entry align="center" colname="c1">
								<p>Aural swab (80)</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2">
								<p>18 (22.5)</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3">
								<p>6 (33.3)</p>
							</entry>
						</row>
						<row rowsep="1">
							<entry align="center" colname="c1">
								<p>Urine (100)</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2">
								<p>12 (12)</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3">
								<p>9 (75)</p>
							</entry>
						</row>
						<row rowsep="1">
							<entry align="center" colname="c1">
								<p>Sputum (50)</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2">
								<p>8 (16)</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3">
								<p>2 (25)</p>
							</entry>
						</row>
						<row rowsep="1">
							<entry align="center" colname="c1">
								<p>Throat swab (50)</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2">
								<p>4 (8)</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3">
								<p>2 (50)</p>
							</entry>
						</row>
						<row rowsep="1">
							<entry align="center" colname="c1">
								<p>Others (10)</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2">
								<p>1 (10)</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3">
								<p>0 (0)</p>
							</entry>
						</row>
						<row rowsep="1">
							<entry align="center" colname="c1">
								<p>Total</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2">
								<p>82</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3">
								<p>31 (37.8)</p>
							</entry>
						</row>
					</tbody>
				</tgroup>
			</table><p>Distribution of <it>Pseudomonas</it> species and serotypes of <it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</it> with ESBL positive strains are shown in Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>. Of 120 <it>Pseudomonas</it> isolates, 82 were identified at the species level based on their distinct biochemical and pigment production characteristics <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. <it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Ralstonia pickettii</it> and <it>Pseudomonas alkaligenes</it> were detected at a frequency of 74 (90.2%), 2 (2.45%), 2 (2.45%), 2 (2.45%) and 2 (2.45%) respectively. Of 74 <it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</it> isolates, 29 (39.2%) were ESBL positive. Serotyping of <it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</it> revealed 25 as A,C,H,I,L (polyvalent group I), 17 as B,J,K,M (polyvalent group II) and 32 as D,E,F,G,N (polyvalent group III).</p>
			<table id="T2">
				<title>
					<p>Table 2</p>
				</title>
				<caption>
					<p>
						<b>
							<it>Pseudomonas </it>
						</b><b>species and serotypes of </b><b>
							<it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa </it>
						</b><b>with ESBL positivity</b>
					</p>
				</caption>
				<tgroup align="left" cols="3">
					<colspec align="left" colname="c1" colnum="1" colwidth="1*"/>
					<colspec align="center" colname="c2" colnum="2" colwidth="1*"/>
					<colspec align="center" colname="c3" colnum="3" colwidth="1*"/>
					<thead valign="top">
						<row rowsep="1">
							<entry colname="c1">
								<p>
									<b>Species</b>
								</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2">
								<p>
									<b>Number</b>
								</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3">
								<p>
									<b>ESBL-positive n (%)</b>
								</p>
							</entry>
						</row>
					</thead>
					<tbody valign="top">
						<row rowsep="1">
							<entry colname="c1">
								<p>
									<it>P. aeruginosa</it>
								</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2">
								<p>74</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3">
								<p>29 (39.2)</p>
							</entry>
						</row>
						<row>
							<entry align="left" colname="c1" rowsep="1">
								<p>Serotypes- A,C,H,I,L &#8722;25</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2"/>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3"/>
						</row>
						<row>
							<entry align="left" colname="c1" rowsep="1">
								<p>&#8195;&#8195;&#8195;B,J,K,M &#8722;17</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2"/>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3"/>
						</row>
						<row rowsep="1">
							<entry align="left" colname="c1">
								<p>&#8195;&#8195;&#8195;D,E,F,G,N-32</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2"/>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3"/>
						</row>
						<row rowsep="1">
							<entry colname="c1">
								<p>
									<it>P. fluorescens</it>
								</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2">
								<p>2</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3">
								<p>0</p>
							</entry>
						</row>
						<row rowsep="1">
							<entry colname="c1">
								<p>
									<it>S. multophilia</it>
								</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2">
								<p>2</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3">
								<p>1 (50)</p>
							</entry>
						</row>
						<row rowsep="1">
							<entry colname="c1">
								<p>
									<it>R. pickettii</it>
								</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2">
								<p>2</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3">
								<p>1 (50)</p>
							</entry>
						</row>
						<row rowsep="1">
							<entry colname="c1">
								<p>
									<it>P. alkaligenes</it>
								</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2">
								<p>2</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3">
								<p>0</p>
							</entry>
						</row>
						<row rowsep="1">
							<entry colname="c1">
								<p>Total</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2">
								<p>82</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3">
								<p>31 (37.8)</p>
							</entry>
						</row>
					</tbody>
				</tgroup>
			</table><p>Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern revealed that Imipenem was the most effective drug against <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp. with susceptibility of 93.3%, followed by Tobramycin (66.7%), Amikacin (63.7%) and Gentamycin (60%). Susceptibility of <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp. to 3rd generation Cephalosporins ranged from 43.3 to 46.7% and Aminoglycosides had better efficacy than 3rd generation Cephalosporins (Table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr>).</p>
			<table id="T3">
				<title>
					<p>Table 3</p>
				</title>
				<caption>
					<p>
						<b>Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of </b><b>
							<it>Pseudomonas </it>
						</b><b>spp</b>
					</p>
				</caption>
				<tgroup align="left" cols="13">
					<colspec align="left" colname="c1" colnum="1" colwidth="1*"/>
					<colspec align="center" colname="c2" colnum="2" colwidth="1*"/>
					<colspec align="center" colname="c3" colnum="3" colwidth="1*"/>
					<colspec align="center" colname="c4" colnum="4" colwidth="1*"/>
					<colspec align="center" colname="c5" colnum="5" colwidth="1*"/>
					<colspec align="center" colname="c6" colnum="6" colwidth="1*"/>
					<colspec align="center" colname="c7" colnum="7" colwidth="1*"/>
					<colspec align="center" colname="c8" colnum="8" colwidth="1*"/>
					<colspec align="center" colname="c9" colnum="9" colwidth="1*"/>
					<colspec align="center" colname="c10" colnum="10" colwidth="1*"/>
					<colspec align="center" colname="c11" colnum="11" colwidth="1*"/>
					<colspec align="center" colname="c12" colnum="12" colwidth="1*"/>
					<colspec align="center" colname="c13" colnum="13" colwidth="1*"/>
					<thead valign="top">
						<row rowsep="1">
							<entry align="center" colname="c1" nameend="c13" namest="c1">
								<p>
									<b>Antimicrobial drugs</b>
								</p>
							</entry>
						</row>
					</thead>
					<tbody valign="top">
						<row>
							<entry align="left" colname="c1">
								<p>Susceptibility%</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2" rowsep="1">
								<p>PIP</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3" rowsep="1">
								<p>CARB</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c4" rowsep="1">
								<p>CAZ</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c5" rowsep="1">
								<p>CRO</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c6" rowsep="1">
								<p>CTX</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c7" rowsep="1">
								<p>CIP</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c8" rowsep="1">
								<p>TET</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c9" rowsep="1">
								<p>AMI</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c10" rowsep="1">
								<p>GEN</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c11" rowsep="1">
								<p>TOB</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c12" rowsep="1">
								<p>NET</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c13" rowsep="1">
								<p>IMP</p>
							</entry>
						</row>
						<row rowsep="1">
							<entry colname="c1"/>
							<entry align="center" colname="c2">
								<p>58</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c3">
								<p>43.3</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c4">
								<p>46.7</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c5">
								<p>46.4</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c6">
								<p>43.3</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c7">
								<p>40</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c8">
								<p>32.5</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c9">
								<p>63.7</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c10">
								<p>60</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c11">
								<p>66.7</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c12">
								<p>53.3</p>
							</entry>
							<entry align="center" colname="c13">
								<p>93.3</p>
							</entry>
						</row>
					</tbody>
				</tgroup>
			</table>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Discussion</p>
			</st><p>ESBL-producing organisms pose unique challenges to clinical microbiologists, clinicians, infection control professionals and scientists engaged in finding new antibacterial molecules. ESBL-producing strains are usually found in those hospitals where antibiotic use is frequent and the patients are in critical condition. In the present study, 120 <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp<it>.</it> were isolated from 600 bacterial cultures with <it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</it> as the most frequent (90.2%) species accounting for 18% of clinical cases. The prevalence of <it>P. aeruginosa</it> is consistent with the findings of Wiblin (1997), who documented 16% prevalence for various infections <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>The rates of ESBL-positive <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp<it>.</it> (37.8%) and <it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</it> (39.2%) found in our study were in accordance with similar studies conducted in Bangladesh and other South East Asian countries <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, although low detection rates of 3.7% to 7.7% were noted in studies conducted by others <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Infection patterns, hospital infection control measures and antibiotic policy are all important considerations for variation of detection rates in different hospitals. Of note, we also found two ESBL-negative <it>P. fluorescens</it> species, and a recent study has shown that these species produce metallo-beta-lactamase, another very important beta-lactam inhibitor that can act as a reservoir of multidrug resistance element that may be transferred to successful <it>P. aeruginosa</it> clones <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>The distribution of ESBL-positive <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp<it>.</it> in different samples and its resistance to 3rd generation Cephalosporins is comparable to the findings of Aggarwal et al. <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. This resistance is due to the hydrolysis of the &#946;-lactam ring by the action of &#946;-lactamase enzymes. Other mechanisms for drug resistance to the &#946;-lactam group of antibiotics are loss of outer membrane protein, production of class C AmpC &#946;-lactamases and altered target sites. ESBL enzymes are inhibited by &#946;-lactamase inhibitors, particularly Clavulanic acid and Sulbactam. Hence the use of &#946;-lactam/&#946;-lactamase inhibitor combination therapy may be an alternative to 3rd generation Cephalosporins, but the effect of this combination varies depending on the subtype of ESBL present <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>Imipenem was found to be the most efficacious drug against <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp. in our study, which is in accordance with findings of Ullah et al. <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>; however, notably in our study, Imipenem underperformed compared to the 100% susceptibility found in ESBL-producing gram-negative isolates, including <it>P. aeruginosa</it>, in different studies <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Decreased susceptibility to Imipenem is a matter of great concern for treating infections caused by <it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</it> and indicates the urgent need for improved infection control strategies.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Conclusion</p>
			</st><p>ESBL-producing <it>Pseudomonas</it> spp., and <it>P. aeruginosa</it> in particular, were found to be frequent isolates from two tertiary care hospitals in Bangladesh with limited susceptibility to antimicrobials. Further, decreased susceptibility to Imipenem is a matter of great concern as it is the drug of choice in the treatment of Pseudomonad infection.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Competing interests</p>
			</st><p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Authors&#8217; contributions</p>
			</st><p>SB conceived the research idea and performed the laboratory work. KFA and NB helped in sample collection and preparation of the manuscript. JAH and PH helped in designing the study and supervision of the work. MAS contributed intellectual thought, final revision and editing of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the submitted version of manuscript.</p>
		</sec>
	</bdy>
	<bm>
		<ack>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Acknowledgement</p>
				</st><p>We acknowledge Colgate Ross MPH, Research Specialist, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Infectious Disease Unit, Burlington, VT 05405, USA, for her contribution in language correction of the manuscript.</p>
			</sec>
		</ack>
		<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p><it>In-vitro</it> efficacy of synergistic antibiotic combinations in multidrug resistant <it>pseudomonas aeruginosa</it> strains</p></title><aug><au><snm>Dundar</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Otkun</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Yonsei Med J</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>51</volume><fpage>111</fpage><lpage>116</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.3349/ymj.2010.51.1.111</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2799966</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20046523</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>Metallo-&#946;-lactamase-producing <it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</it> in two hospitals from Southern Brazil</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wirth</snm><fnm>FW</fnm></au><au><snm>Picoli</snm><fnm>SU</fnm></au><au><snm>Cantarelli</snm><fnm>VV</fnm></au><au><snm>Gon&#231;alves</snm><fnm>AL</fnm></au><au><snm>Brust</snm><fnm>FR</fnm></au><au><snm>Santos</snm><fnm>LM</fnm></au><au><snm>Barreto</snm><fnm>MF</fnm></au></aug><source>Braz J Infect Dis</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>13</volume><fpage>170</fpage><lpage>172</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1590/S1413-86702009000300003</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20191191</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Detection of VEB-1, OXA-10 and PER-1 genotypes in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing <it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</it> strains isolated from burn patients</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mirsalehian</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Feizabadi</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Nakhjavani</snm><fnm>FA</fnm></au><au><snm>Jabalameli</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Goli</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Kalantari</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au></aug><source>Burns</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>36</volume><fpage>70</fpage><lpage>74</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.burns.2009.01.015</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19524369</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>Detection of extendedspectrum &#946;- lactamase in <it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Aggarwal</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Chaudhary</snm><fnm>U</fnm></au><au><snm>Bala</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Indian J Pathol Microbiol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>51</volume><fpage>222</fpage><lpage>224</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.4103/0377-4929.41693</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18603687</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Phenotypic detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production in Enterobacteriaceae: review and bench guide</p></title><aug><au><snm>Drieux</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Brossier</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Sougakoff</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Jarlier</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au></aug><source>Clin Microbiol Infect</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>14</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><fpage>90</fpage><lpage>103</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">18154532</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>Modified double-disc test for detection of extended-spectrum [beta]-lactamases in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kader</snm><fnm>AA</fnm></au><au><snm>Angamuthu</snm><fnm>KK</fnm></au><au><snm>Kamath</snm><fnm>KA</fnm></au><au><snm>Zaman</snm><fnm>MN</fnm></au></aug><source>British J Biomedical Science</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>63</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>51</fpage><lpage>54</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Pseudomonadaceae</p></title><aug><au><snm>Palleroni</snm><fnm>NJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Bergey&#8217;s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology</source><publisher>Baltimore: Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><editor>Krieg NR, Holt JG</editor><pubdate>1984</pubdate><fpage>141</fpage><lpage>219</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">23038147</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B8"><aug><au><cnm>National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards</cnm></au></aug><source>Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests</source><publisher>Wayne, PA, USA: Informational Supplement M100-S21. CLSI</publisher><edition>Twenty-First editionth</edition><pubdate>2010</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>Extended spectrum &#946;-lactamases conferring transferable resistance to newer &#946;- lactam agents in Enterobacteriaceae: Hospital prevalence and susceptibility patterns</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jarlier</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Nicolas</snm><fnm>MH</fnm></au><au><snm>Fournier</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Philippon</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Rev Infect Dis</source><pubdate>1988</pubdate><volume>10</volume><fpage>867</fpage><lpage>878</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/clinids/10.4.867</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">3263690</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>Nosocomial pneumonia</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wiblin</snm><fnm>RT</fnm></au></aug><source>Prevention and control of nosocomial infections</source><publisher>Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins</publisher><editor>Wenzel RP</editor><edition>3rd</edition><pubdate>1997</pubdate><fpage>807</fpage><lpage>819</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>Beta-lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in hospitalised patients</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pandey</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Malenie</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Asthana</snm><fnm>AK</fnm></au></aug><source>Indian J Pathol Microbiol</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>48</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>530</fpage><lpage>533</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">16366119</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>Detection of ESBL producing nosocomial gram negative bacteria from a tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh</p></title><aug><au><snm>Haque</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Salam</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au></aug><source>Pak J Med Sci</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>887</fpage><lpage>891</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>Antimicrobial susceptibility and ESBL prevalence in pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn patients in the North West of Pakistan</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ullah</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Malik</snm><fnm>SA</fnm></au><au><snm>Ahmed</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Burns</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>35</volume><issue>7</issue><fpage>1020</fpage><lpage>1025</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.burns.2009.01.005</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19501980</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Detection of <it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</it> isolates producing VEB-type extended-spectrum &#946;-lactamases in the United Kingdom</p></title><aug><au><snm>Woodford</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Kaufmann</snm><fnm>ME</fnm></au><au><snm>Yarde</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Tomas Mdel</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Faris</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Vardhan</snm><fnm>MS</fnm></au><au><snm>Dawson</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Cotterill</snm><fnm>SL</fnm></au><au><snm>Livermore</snm><fnm>DM</fnm></au></aug><source>J Antimicrob Chemother</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>62</volume><fpage>1265</fpage><lpage>1268</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/jac/dkn400</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18819973</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>Genetic fingerprinting and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of <it>Pseudomonas aeroginosa</it> hospital isolates in Malaysia</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lim</snm><fnm>KT</fnm></au><au><snm>Yasin</snm><fnm>RM</fnm></au><au><snm>Yeo</snm><fnm>CC</fnm></au><au><snm>Puthucheary</snm><fnm>SD</fnm></au><au><snm>Balan</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Maning</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Wahab</snm><fnm>ZA</fnm></au><au><snm>Ismail</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Tan</snm><fnm>EA</fnm></au><au><snm>Mustaffa</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Thong</snm><fnm>KL</fnm></au></aug><source>J Microbiol Immunol Infect</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>42</volume><fpage>197</fpage><lpage>209</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">19812853</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>Metallo-beta-lactamase-producing pseudomonas putida as a reservoir of multidrug resistance elements that can be transferred to successful pseudomonas aeruginosa clones</p></title><aug><au><snm>Juan</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Zamorano</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Mena</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Albert&#237;</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>P&#233;rez</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au><au><snm>Oliver</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>J Antimicrob Chemother</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>65</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>474</fpage><lpage>478</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/jac/dkp491</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20071364</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><title><p>2nd Extended spectrum &#946;-lactamases: epidemiology, detection and treatment</p></title><aug><au><snm>Nathisuwan</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Burgess</snm><fnm>DS</fnm></au><au><snm>Lewis</snm><fnm>JS</fnm></au></aug><source>Pharmacotherapy</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>920</fpage><lpage>928</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1592/phco.21.11.920.34529</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11718498</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>Variations in the prevalence of strains expressing an extended spectrum &#946;-lactamase phenotype and characterisation of isolates from Europe, the Americans and the Western Pacific region</p></title><aug><au><snm>Winokur</snm><fnm>PL</fnm></au><au><snm>Canton</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Casellas</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Legakis</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au></aug><source>Clin Infect Dis</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>32</volume><fpage>594</fpage><lpage>603</lpage></bibl></refgrp>
	</bm>
</art>