<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
	<ui>1746-6148-8-232</ui>
	<ji>1746-6148</ji>
	<fm>
		<dochead>Research article</dochead>
		<bibl>
			<title>
				<p>Effects of inadequate maternal dietary protein:carbohydrate ratios during pregnancy on offspring immunity in pigs</p>
			</title>
			<aug>
				<au id="A1" ca="yes"><snm>Tuchscherer</snm><fnm>Margret</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>mtuchsch@fbn-dummerstorf.de</email></au>
				<au id="A2"><snm>Otten</snm><fnm>Winfried</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>otten@fbn-dummerstorf.de</email></au>
				<au id="A3"><snm>Kanitz</snm><fnm>Ellen</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>ekanitz@fbn-dummerstorf.de</email></au>
				<au id="A4"><snm>Gr&#228;bner</snm><fnm>Maria</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>maria_graebner@hotmail.com</email></au>
				<au id="A5"><snm>Tuchscherer</snm><fnm>Armin</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>atuchsch@fbn-dummerstorf.de</email></au>
				<au id="A6"><snm>Bellmann</snm><fnm>Olaf</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>bellmann@fbn-dummerstorf.de</email></au>
				<au id="A7"><snm>Rehfeldt</snm><fnm>Charlotte</fnm><insr iid="I4"/><email>rehfeldt@fbn-dummerstorf.de</email></au>
				<au id="A8"><snm>Metges</snm><mi>C</mi><fnm>Cornelia</fnm><insr iid="I5"/><email>metges@fbn-dummerstorf.de</email></au>
			</aug>
			<insg>
				<ins id="I1"><p>Research Unit Behavioural Physiology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany</p></ins>
				<ins id="I2"><p>Research Unit Genetics and Biometry, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany</p></ins>
				<ins id="I3"><p>Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany</p></ins>
				<ins id="I4"><p>Research Unit Muscle Biology &amp; Growth, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany</p></ins>
				<ins id="I5"><p>Research Unit Nutritional Physiology &#8220;Oskar Kellner&#8221;, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany</p></ins>
			</insg>
			<source>BMC Veterinary Research</source>
			<section><title><p>Physiology, biochemistry, and immunology</p></title></section><issn>1746-6148</issn>
			<pubdate>2012</pubdate>
			<volume>8</volume>
			<issue>1</issue>
			<fpage>232</fpage>
			<url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/8/232</url>
			<xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1746-6148-8-232</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">23190629</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
		</bibl>
		<history><rec><date><day>9</day><month>7</month><year>2012</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>23</day><month>11</month><year>2012</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>28</day><month>11</month><year>2012</year></date></pub></history>
		<cpyrt><year>2012</year><collab>Tuchscherer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
		<abs>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Abstract</p>
				</st>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Background</p>
					</st><p>Inadequate nutrition <it>in utero</it> may retard foetal growth and alter physiological development of offspring. This study investigated the effects of low and high protein diets fed to primiparous German Landrace sows throughout pregnancy on the immune function of their offspring at different ages. Sows were fed diets with adequate (AP, 12.1%; <it>n</it>&#8201;=&#8201;13), low (LP, 6.5%; <it>n</it>&#8201;=&#8201;15), or high (HP, 30%; <it>n</it>&#8201;=&#8201;14) protein content, made isoenergetic by varying carbohydrate levels. Cortisol, total protein and immunoglobulin (IgG, IgM, IgA) concentrations were measured in the blood of sows over the course of pregnancy. Cortisol, total protein, immunoglobulins, lymphocyte proliferation, immune cell counts, and cytokines were assessed in the blood of offspring at baseline and under challenging conditions (weaning; lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration).</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Results</p>
					</st><p>In sows, the LP diet increased cortisol (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05) and decreased protein levels (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.01) at the end of pregnancy. Immunoglobulin concentrations were decreased in LP (IgA) and HP piglets (IgG, IgM and IgA) on the first day of life (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05), whereas the number of lymphocytes and mitogen-induced lymphocyte proliferation of the piglets were unaffected by the maternal diet. Mortality during the suckling period was higher in LP piglets compared with AP and HP offspring (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.01). Furthermore, LP piglets showed an elevated cortisol response to weaning, and in HP piglets, the CD4<sup>+</sup> cell percentage and the CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> ratio increased after weaning (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05). The lipopolysaccharide-induced rise of IL-6 was higher in LP (<it>P</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.09) and HP (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.01) compared with AP piglets, and LP piglets displayed higher IL-10 levels than AP piglets (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05).</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Conclusions</p>
					</st><p>Our results indicate that both low and high protein:carbohydrate ratios in the diet of pregnant sows can induce short-term as well as long-lasting effects on immune competence in piglets that may have serious consequences for host defence against bacterial pathogens.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
		</abs>
	</fm>
	<bdy>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Background</p>
			</st><p>Inadequate maternal nutrition and stress during gestation can affect the physiological development of offspring and may increase their susceptibility to diseases later in life <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Across species, including laboratory animals, non-human primates, and humans, reduced birth weight is a major outcome of disturbances during gestation <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> that may be associated with altered activity of the neuroendocrine system <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> and modified immune function in offspring <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Also in domestic pigs, prenatally stressed offspring displayed altered hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis regulation <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, suppressed humoral and cellular immune responses <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, increased cortisol levels after social mixing <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> and stronger fever and cytokine responses to an inflammatory stimulus <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Inadequate maternal dietary protein and/or carbohydrate levels during pregnancy in pigs have been shown to retard intrauterine growth resulting in low body weight at birth, and to affect body composition and properties of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue of the offspring <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The main metabolic effect in pregnant sows fed a high protein-low carbohydrate diet was a glucose and energy deficit, whereas a low protein-high carbohydrate diet resulted in a lack of indispensable amino acids, as recently reported by our group <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>Yet, only few studies in rodents have examined the effects of imbalanced maternal protein nutrition throughout pregnancy on dam and offspring immunity. In rats, both low (4%) and high (20%) dietary protein levels during gestation led to alterations in plasma protein, albumin and &#947;-globulin levels of pregnant rats and their neonates compared with a 10% control diet <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Furthermore, moderate dietary protein restriction in pregnant rats impaired offspring thymocyte proliferation at birth and thymic and spleen lymphocyte proliferation at weaning <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Although there is increasing evidence that production characteristics in pigs may be affected by dietary protein imbalance during gestation <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, knowledge on the effects of inadequate maternal dietary protein levels on the developing immune system in porcine offspring is lacking. This is especially relevant because in addition to a low birth weight, altered immune reactivity in neonatal pigs is associated with a greater risk of postnatal mortality, a major concern with regard to animal welfare <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>Moreover, exposure to adverse nutritional environments <it>in utero</it> has been shown to have programming effects on tissue function that may be related to elevated risk of metabolic, endocrine and cardiovascular disorders in adulthood <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. For example, a low protein diet in rodent pregnancy has induced high blood pressure and renal dysfunction in the offspring <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, and prenatal high dietary protein exposure resulted in increased adiposity in young rats <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. However, little is known regarding whether prenatal nutritional factors may also alter the physiological adaptive responses of offspring to stressful situations or immune challenges later in life.</p><p>In the present study, we used our recently developed model of intrauterine growth restriction in which dietary protein to carbohydrate ratios in pregnant primiparous sows are modulated <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The objective of this experiment was to investigate the effects of low (6.5%) and high (30%) protein:carbohydrate ratios in the diet of sows throughout pregnancy on the immune system of their offspring at different ages. To this end, the impact of the maternal diet on cortisol, protein and immunoglobulin levels in sow blood over the course of pregnancy was determined, and the immune systems of piglets were evaluated by measuring total serum protein and immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgM, IgA), lymphocyte proliferation, proportions of circulating lymphocyte subpopulations and cytokine levels at baseline and under challenging conditions (weaning and LPS administration). The intensity of the challenge was also measured by determining the response of the HPA axis.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Methods</p>
			</st><p>All procedures including use and treatment of animals were in accordance with the German animal protection law and approved by the relevant authorities (Landesamt f&#252;r Landwirtschaft, Lebensmittelsicherheit und Fischerei Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany; LVL M-V/TSD/7221.3-1.1-006/04; LALLF M-V/TSD/7221.3-1.2-05/06; LALLF M-V/TSD/7221.3-1.2-013/06). The present experimental investigation is part of a comprehensive study recently described by Rehfeldt et al. <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Animals and treatments</p>
				</st><p>A total of 42 primiparous German Landrace sows and their litters, bred and raised in the experimental pig unit of our institute, were used for the experiment with 6 independent replicates. Housing and breeding management were as recently described in detail <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. The sows were fed an isoenergetic corn-barley and soybean meal diet (~13.7 MJ ME/kg) containing an adequate (AP, 12.1%; n&#8201;=&#8201;13), a low (LP, 6.5%; n&#8201;=&#8201;15) or a high (HP, 30%; n&#8201;=&#8201;14) protein level corresponding to protein:carbohydrate ratios of 1:5, 1:10.4, and 1:1.3, respectively, throughout gestation <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. Diets were fed between 2.3 and 2.9 kg/d from early to late pregnancy to achieve an average target energy intake of ~34 MJ ME/d during gestation following the recommendations for primiparous sows <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. The sows were fed twice daily, and water was provided <it>ad libitum</it>. Farrowing was induced at gestation day (GD) 114 as described previously <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>.</p><p>After overnight food withdrawal, blood samples of sows were taken on GD &#8722;5, 24, 66 and 108 by jugular vein puncture. EDTA blood samples were centrifuged at 2000&#8201;&#215;&#8201;<it>g</it> for 15 min at 4&#176;C to separate plasma, which was analysed for cortisol. Whole blood samples were allowed to clot for 4 h at room temperature and centrifuged at 1000&#8201;&#215;&#8201;<it>g</it> for 15 min at 4&#176;C to obtain serum for analyses of total protein and immunoglobulins IgG, IgA and IgM. Plasma and serum samples were stored at &#8722;20&#176;C until analysis.</p><p>Litter size, piglets born alive and dead, individual birth weights and sex of piglets were recorded at birth. Runt piglets weighing less than 800 g were excluded from further experiments. From each experimental litter, usually three to four piglets (the lightest one, 1&#8211;2 of medium weight, the heaviest one) were sampled between 24 to 36 h after birth (day 1 (D1): AP, n&#8201;=&#8201;43; LP, n&#8201;=&#8201;51; HP, n&#8201;=&#8201;48). Three to four other piglets, in single cases only two piglets of each litter, were randomly assigned for sampling on D27 (AP, n&#8201;=&#8201;42; LP, n&#8201;=&#8201;46; HP, n&#8201;=&#8201;41), and the remaining piglets were sampled on D80 (AP, n&#8201;=&#8201;24; LP, n&#8201;=&#8201;25; HP, n&#8201;=&#8201;20) or D180 (AP, n&#8201;=&#8201;23; LP, n&#8201;=&#8201;24; HP, n&#8201;=&#8201;21). Sex was almost equally distributed within diets. The timeline for blood sampling and distribution of animals in the different diet groups are summarised in Figure&#8201;<figr fid="F1">1</figr>.</p>
				<fig id="F1"><title><p>Figure 1</p></title><caption><p>Timeline: summary of blood sampling and distribution of animals in different diet groups.</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Timeline: summary of blood sampling and distribution of animals in different diet groups. </b> Sows were fed adequate (AP, 12.1%), low (LP, 6.5%) and high (HP, 30%) dietary protein levels throughout gestation.</p>
</text><graphic file="1746-6148-8-232-1"/></fig><p>Piglets were cross-fostered within 48 h after birth to multiparous sows fed a standard diet during pregnancy (Provital RF R.324.0; Trede &amp; Pein, Dammfleth, Germany). The litters were standardised to 11 piglets with piglets from foster sows. After birth, experimental sows and foster sows were fed a single standard lactation diet (Provital LAC R.325.0; Trede &amp; Pein, Dammfleth, Germany). Male piglets were castrated at four days of age. The piglets were weaned at D28 and housed in groups of four littermates per pen (2.5 m x 1.8 m) in a post-weaning room until D32. Thereafter, they were transferred to single-housing cages for the rest of the experimental period. Piglets were offered a commercial pellet diet from an automatic feeder. Food and water were provided <it>ad libitum</it>.</p><p>Blood samples from the offspring were taken while animals were in a supine position by anterior vena cava puncture on D1, D27, D29 and D47 as well as by jugular vein puncture on D80 and D180 (the whole procedure lasted approximately 1 min). Blood samples without anti-coagulant were treated as described above to obtain serum for analyses of total protein and immunoglobulins IgG, IgM and IgA (D1, D27, D80 and D180). Additionally, heparinised blood samples were stored on ice until processing for the proliferation assay (D1 and D27).</p><p>One day before (D27) and one day after weaning (D29), EDTA-plasma samples were used for cortisol analyses, and heparinised blood samples were collected and stored on ice until processing for the proliferation assay and flow cytometric analysis (AP, n&#8201;=&#8201;20; LP, n&#8201;=&#8201;17; HP, n&#8201;=&#8201;20). On D47, a subset of piglets (AP, n&#8201;=&#8201;15; LP, n&#8201;=&#8201;18; HP, n&#8201;=&#8201;9) received an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of LPS from <it>Escherichia coli</it> (serotype O111:B4, Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO, USA) at a dose of 100 &#956;g/kg of body weight dissolved in 2 mL sterile saline. Blood samples were taken immediately before LPS injection (0h, baseline for all measures), 1 h later for analysis of TNF-&#945;, and 3 and 6 h later to measure cortisol and cytokines (TNF-&#945;, IL-6 and IL-10). Blood samples were treated as described previously.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Laboratory analyses</p>
				</st><p>Plasma cortisol concentrations were analysed in duplicates using a commercially available <sup>125</sup>I-RIA kit (DSL, Inc., Sinsheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer&#8217;s instructions. The test sensitivity was 8.1 nmol/L, and intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 8.2% and 9.8%, respectively. Total protein content in serum was determined by the biuret-method (Bioquant&#174; Protein 110307; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Concentrations of immunoglobulins IgG, IgA and IgM were determined in duplicate with porcine specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) according to the manufacturer&#8217;s instructions (Bethyl, Laboratories Inc., Montgomery, TX USA). The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation for the ELISAs were &lt;5% and &lt;10%, respectively. TNF-&#945; and IL-10 concentrations were analysed in plasma samples using commercially available pig ELISA kits (Biosource Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) according to the manufacturer&#8217;s instructions. The sensitivity of the TNF-&#945; assay was 3 pg/mL, and intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 6.2% and 8.2%, respectively. The detection limit of the IL-10 assay was 3 pg/mL. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 6.3% and 9.4%, respectively. Plasma concentrations of IL-6 were determined with pig IL-6 ELISA kits (R&amp;D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer&#8217;s instructions. The sensitivity of this assay was 10 pg/mL, and the intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 3.5% and 8.1%, respectively.</p><p>The mitogens Concanavalin A (5 &#956;g/mL; ConA) and lipopolysaccharide (10 &#956;g/mL; LPS) were used in lymphocyte proliferation/viability assays as previously described <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B28">28</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. Briefly, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from heparinised blood by density gradient centrifugation, and the cell concentration was adjusted to 5&#8201;&#215;&#8201;10<sup>6</sup> cells/mL in complete RPMI-1640 medium (Sigma-Aldrich, Deisenhofen, Germany). PBMCs were incubated in 96-well microplates for 72 h in a 5% CO<sub>2</sub> humidified incubator at 37&#176;C. Cell proliferation/viability was evaluated using the 3-[4,5-dimethyldiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The optical density (O.D.) was measured by a microplate reader (Dynatech, Denkendorf, Germany) using a test wavelength of 550 nm and a reference wavelength of 690 nm. The results were expressed as a proliferation index (PI), which was calculated as follows: PI&#8201;=&#8201;O.D. in the presence of mitogen/O.D. in the absence of mitogen.</p><p>Immunofluorescence double staining for flow cytometry was performed by incubating 200 &#956;L of the PBMC suspension (1&#8201;&#215;&#8201;10<sup>6</sup> cells) with 10 &#956;L of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated mouse-anti-porcine CD4&#945; (IgG2b isotype) and 10 &#956;l R-phycoerythrin (RPE)-conjugated mouse-anti-porcine CD8&#945; (IgG2a isotype) monoclonal antibodies (AbD Serotec, Oxford, UK) in the dark at room temperature for 30 min. Excess antibodies were removed by washing plates twice with PBS/1% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and centrifuging at 180&#8201;&#215;&#8201;g for 5 min at 20&#176;C. The cell pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of PBS/1% FBS for immediate analysis using an EPICS XL flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Krefeld Germany). The cells were gated on previously established bitmaps based on the forward and side scatter characteristics of each population. The proportion of cells was calculated after acquisition of at least 6000 events as described by L&#246;hrke et al. <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B29">29</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. To estimate the specific binding of mouse monoclonal antibodies to cell surface of lymphocytes mouse-IgG2b negative control-FITC and mouse-IgG2a negative control-RPE (Serotec, Oxford, UK) were used.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Statistical analysis</p>
				</st><p>Statistical analyses were performed using the SAS System for Windows, release 9.2 <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B30">30</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. Data were evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the Mixed procedure. The model for blood parameters of sows comprised the fixed effects diet (AP, LP, HP), replicate (1 to 6), repeated factor time (GD&#8201;&#8722;&#8201;5, GD24, GD66, GD108) and all two-way interactions. Gestation length and litter data were analysed with the model comprising the fixed effects diet, replicate and the interaction diet&#8201;&#215;&#8201;replicate. The mixed model for birth weight and early weight gain of piglets included the fixed effects diet, sex (male, female) and replicate, the corresponding 2-way interactions and the random effect of sow. Frequencies of stillborn and dead piglets per litter were analysed by fitting a logistic model using the GLIMMIX procedure. The model included the fixed effects diet, replicate and the interaction diet&#8201;&#215;&#8201;replicate. The model for basal blood parameters in offspring comprised the fixed effects diet, age (D1, D27, D80, D180), sex, replicate, all two-way interactions between the fixed effects and the random sow effect. The model for weaning data and for measurement with LPS challenge in piglets included the fixed effects diet, sex, replicate, sampling time as repeated factor (for weaning: D27, D29 and for LPS challenge: 0 h, 1 h, 3 h, 6 h), all two-way interactions between these fixed effects and the random sow effect. In addition, least-squares means (LS-means) and their standard errors (SE) were computed for each fixed effect in the models, and all pairwise differences of LS-means were tested by the Tukey-Kramer procedure. Correlations between plasma cortisol levels in sows on GD108 and immune parameters in their neonatal offspring were estimated by Spearman&#8217;s rank correlation coefficients within each diet group using the Corr procedure. Effects and differences were considered significant if <it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Results</p>
			</st>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>General observations</p>
				</st><p>No effects of diet were found on the gestation length, the total number born or the frequency of stillborn piglets (<it>P</it>&#8201;&gt;&#8201;0.3; data not shown). Further, the litter size was not influenced by diet (AP: 11.5&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.7; LP: 12.7&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.7; HP: 11.5&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.8; <it>P</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.42). However, the maternal diet significantly affected the weight of piglets at birth. Both the LP and the HP diet caused a reduction in offspring birth weight compared to control AP piglets (AP: 1.35&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.04 kg; LP: 1.20&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.03 kg; HP: 1.23&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.03 kg; <it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05), which is consistent with the results obtained for all piglets born<sup>(15)</sup>. LP piglets gained less weight compared with AP and HP piglets during the first day of life (AP: 78&#8201;&#177;&#8201;15 g; LP: 29&#8201;&#177;&#8201;14 g; HP: 85&#8201;&#177;&#8201;15 g; <it>P</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.05). Piglet mortality during the suckling period was higher in the LP than in the AP and HP groups (AP: 3.0&#8201;&#177;&#8201;1.7%; LP: 11.2&#8201;&#177;&#8201;1.7%; HP: 4.0&#8201;&#177;&#8201;1.8%; <it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.01).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Effects of diet on sows</p>
				</st><p>Plasma cortisol concentrations of primiparous sows were affected by diet and time (Table&#8201;<tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). HP sows had lower cortisol levels than AP (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.01) and LP sows (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05). The Tukey-Kramer means separation procedure indicated that the cortisol concentration in the plasma from LP sows was significantly higher compared with HP sows on GD108 (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05). In AP and LP sows, cortisol levels increased from early to late pregnancy (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05). In this subset of sows, serum protein concentrations tended to be affected by diet, but were significantly influenced by time and diet&#8201;&#215;&#8201;time interaction (Table&#8201;<tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). On GD108, protein concentrations were significantly lower in LP than in AP (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.01) and HP sows (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.001). In addition, the protein levels decreased within the LP group at the end of pregnancy (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.01), whereas the protein levels increased within the HP group from GD24 to GD66 (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05). Serum immunoglobulin levels were affected by time during pregnancy (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.001), but not by pregnancy diet (Table&#8201;<tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). Independent of the diet, IgG and IgM levels increased from GD24 to GD66 (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.01). In AP and LP sows, serum IgA decreased from GD&#8201;&#8722;&#8201;5 to GD24 (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.01). Furthermore, ANOVA revealed a significant diet&#8201;&#215;&#8201;time interaction for IgA levels.</p>
				<table id="T1">
					<title>
						<p>Table 1</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>
							<b>Cortisol, total protein and immunoglobulin concentrations of sows on gestation days &#8722;5, 24, 66 and 108</b>
						</p>
					</caption>
					<tgroup align="left" cols="10">
						<colspec align="center" colname="c1" colnum="1" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c2" colnum="2" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c3" colnum="3" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c4" colnum="4" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c5" colnum="5" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c6" colnum="6" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c7" colnum="7" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c8" colnum="8" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c9" colnum="9" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c10" colnum="10" colwidth="1*"/>
						<thead valign="top">
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2"/>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3" nameend="c6" namest="c3" rowsep="1">
									<p>
										<b>Time</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c7"/>
								<entry align="center" colname="c8" nameend="c10" namest="c8" rowsep="1">
									<p>
										<b>
											<it>P</it>
										</b><b>-values</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>
										<b>Diet</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>
										<b>GD&#8201;&#8722;&#8201;5</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>
										<b>GD24</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5">
									<p>
										<b>GD66</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c6">
									<p>
										<b>GD108</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c7">
									<p>
										<b>SE</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c8">
									<p>
										<b>Diet</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c9">
									<p>
										<b>Time</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c10">
									<p>
										<b>Diet&#8201;&#215;&#8201;Time</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
						</thead>
						<tfoot>
							<p>
								<it>GD</it>, gestation day.</p><p>Sows were fed diets with adequate (12.1%, <it>n</it>&#8201;=&#8201;13), low (6.5%, <it>n</it>&#8201;=&#8201;15) and high (30%, <it>n</it>&#8201;=&#8201;14) protein levels throughout gestation.</p><p>Data are expressed as least-squares means (LS-means)&#8201;&#177;&#8201;standard errors (SE).</p><p>
								<it>P</it> values for effects of diet, time and diet&#8201;&#215;&#8201;time interaction.</p><p>
								<sup>A,B</sup>Within parameter and time, LS-means with unlike capital superscript letters were significantly different between diets (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05; Tukey-Kramer test).</p><p>
								<sup>a,b</sup>Within a row, LS-means with unlike lower case superscript letters were significantly different between times (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05; Tukey-Kramer test).</p>
						</tfoot>
						<tbody valign="top">
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Cortisol</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>Adequate</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>64.8<sup>a</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>63.3<sup>a</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>86.8</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>95.8<sup>b</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>6.9</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8"/>
								<entry colname="c9"/>
								<entry colname="c10"/>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>(nmol/L)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>Low</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>51.4<sup>a</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>65.4<sup>a</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>72.4<sup>a</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>101.9<sup>A,b</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>6.4</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.009</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>&lt; 0.001</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>0.249</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>High</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>52.5</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>50.0</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>62.3</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>73.9<sup>B</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>6.8</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8"/>
								<entry colname="c9"/>
								<entry colname="c10"/>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Total protein</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>Adequate</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>77.7</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>75.1</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>79.2</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>76.6<sup>A</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>1.3</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8"/>
								<entry colname="c9"/>
								<entry colname="c10"/>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>(mg/mL)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>Low</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>79.3<sup>a</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>75.1<sup>a</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>77.0<sup>a</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>68.8<sup>B,b</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>1.3</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.082</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>&lt; 0.001</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>&lt; 0.001</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>High</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>79.5</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>75.1<sup>a</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>80.4<sup>b</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>78.5<sup>A</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>1.4</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8"/>
								<entry colname="c9"/>
								<entry colname="c10"/>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>IgG (mg/mL)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>Adequate</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>15.9</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>12.9<sup>a</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>17.1<sup>b</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>14.4</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.8</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8"/>
								<entry colname="c9"/>
								<entry colname="c10"/>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>Low</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>14.4</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>13.5<sup>a</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>17.7<sup>b</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>16.4</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.7</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.697</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>&lt; 0.001</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>0.241</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>High</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>14.9</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>13.2<sup>a</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>17.6<sup>b</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>16.8</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.8</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8"/>
								<entry colname="c9"/>
								<entry colname="c10"/>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>IgM (mg/mL)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>Adequate</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>6.10</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>5.26<sup>a</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>7.70<sup>b</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>7.22</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.62</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8"/>
								<entry colname="c9"/>
								<entry colname="c10"/>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>Low</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>6.42</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>6.10<sup>a</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>8.01<sup>b</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>7.54</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.58</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.519</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>&lt; 0.001</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>0.481</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>High</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>6.44</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>6.89<sup>a</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>8.48<sup>b</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>7.98</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.64</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8"/>
								<entry colname="c9"/>
								<entry colname="c10"/>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>IgA (mg/mL)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>Adequate</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>1.15<sup>a</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.63<sup>b</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>0.83</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>1.03</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.12</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8"/>
								<entry colname="c9"/>
								<entry colname="c10"/>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>Low</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>1.21<sup>a</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.85<sup>b</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>1.11</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>1.10</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.12</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.517</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>&lt; 0.001</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>0.012</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>High</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.90</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.81</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>0.93</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>1.06</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.13</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8"/>
								<entry colname="c9"/>
								<entry colname="c10"/>
							</row>
						</tbody>
					</tgroup>
				</table>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Effects of maternal diet on offspring</p>
				</st><p>Maternal diet did not affect the concentrations of serum total protein (<it>P</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.75) or immunoglobulins in the offspring (<it>P</it>&#8201;&gt;&#8201;0.2) over all ages examined. There were lower protein levels on D1, D27 and D80 compared with D180 for all pigs (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.001, Figure&#8201;<figr fid="F2">2</figr>A). We also found significant differences in the concentrations of immunoglobulins between the diet groups on the first day of life. At D1, the IgG and IgM levels in HP piglets were lower than in AP piglets (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05, Figure&#8201;<figr fid="F2">2</figr>B and C, respectively), and the IgA levels were lower in both LP and HP piglets compared with AP piglets (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05, Figure&#8201;<figr fid="F2">2</figr>D). Concentrations of IgG, IgM and IgA were significantly affected by age (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.001), with similar patterns in all dietary groups. The lowest immunoglobulin levels were measured in piglets on D27 compared with D1, D80 and D180 (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.001).</p>
				<fig id="F2"><title><p>Figure 2</p></title><caption><p>Total serum protein (A) and immunoglobulin IgG (B), IgM (C) and IgA (D) concentrations in pigs.</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Total serum protein (A) and immunoglobulin IgG (B), IgM (C) and IgA (D) concentrations in pigs.</b> Piglets were born to sows fed adequate (AP, 12.1%), low (LP, 6.5%) and high (HP, 30%) dietary protein levels throughout gestation. Blood samples were taken on D1 (AP, n&#8201;=&#8201;43; LP, n&#8201;=&#8201;51; HP, n&#8201;=&#8201;48), D27 (AP, n&#8201;=&#8201;42; LP, n&#8201;=&#8201;46; HP, n&#8201;=&#8201;41), D80 (AP, n&#8201;=&#8201;24; LP, n&#8201;=&#8201;25; HP, n&#8201;=&#8201;20) and D180 (AP, n&#8201;=&#8201;23; LP, n&#8201;=&#8201;24; HP, n&#8201;=&#8201;21). Data are expressed as LS-means&#8201;+&#8201;SE. Significant differences between diet groups are indicated by asterisk (* <it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05; Tukey-Kramer test).</p>
</text><graphic file="1746-6148-8-232-2"/></fig><p>Further, there was no significant effect of maternal diet on the number of PBMCs or the mitogen-induced PBMC proliferation in response to either ConA or LPS in piglets at D1 and D27 of age (<it>P</it>&#8201;&gt;&#8201;0.2; data not shown). The factor sex and the interaction diet&#8201;&#215;&#8201;age had no significant effects on any of the traits of the offspring that were investigated (<it>P</it>&#8201;&gt;&#8201;0.12).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Relationship between cortisol levels in sows and immune parameters in their neonatal offspring</p>
				</st><p>To investigate the relationships between plasma cortisol levels in sows on GD108 and immune parameters in their neonatal offspring, Spearman&#8217;s rank correlation coefficients were estimated within each diet group (AP: n&#8201;=&#8201;41; LP: n&#8201;=&#8201;49; HP: n&#8201;=&#8201;46). In the LP and HP groups, negative correlations were found between the cortisol levels in sows at the end of pregnancy and total protein concentrations in the serum of piglets on the first day of life (rs&#8201;=&#8201;&#8722;0.306, <it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05, and rs&#8201;=&#8201;&#8722;0.378, <it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.01, respectively), whereas no significant correlation was observed in the AP group (rs&#8201;=&#8201;&#8722;0.102, <it>P</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.52). There were also negative correlations between the cortisol levels of sows and IgA levels of piglets in both the LP and HP groups (rs&#8201;=&#8201;&#8722;0.374, <it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.01, and rs&#8201;=&#8201;&#8722;0.443, <it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.01, respectively), but not in the AP group (rs&#8201;=&#8201;+0.107, <it>P</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.52). In addition, the cortisol levels of sows and the IgM concentrations in piglets were negatively correlated in the LP group (rs&#8201;=&#8201;&#8722;0.481, <it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.001), but were not in the AP and HP groups (rs&#8201;=&#8201;&#8722;0.201, <it>P</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.21, and rs&#8201;=&#8201;&#8722;0.198, <it>P</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.19, respectively). No further significant relationships were found between the cortisol levels in late-pregnant sows of the three diet groups and immune parameters in neonatal piglets (<it>P</it>&#8201;&gt;&#8201;0.2).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Effects of maternal diet on the response to weaning stress</p>
				</st><p>The plasma cortisol level was not affected by maternal diet and the interaction diet&#8201;&#215;&#8201;sampling time (<it>P</it>&#8201;&gt;&#8201;0.14), but sampling time had a significant effect (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.01). The Tukey-Kramer means separation test showed that only the LP piglets displayed a significantly higher cortisol level one day after weaning than before (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05, Figure&#8201;<figr fid="F3">3</figr>).</p>
				<fig id="F3"><title><p>Figure 3</p></title><caption><p>Plasma cortisol concentration in weaned piglets.</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Plasma cortisol concentration in weaned piglets. </b>Piglets were born to sows fed adequate (AP, 12.1%), low (LP, 6.5%) and high (HP, 30%) protein levels throughout gestation. Blood samples were taken before (D27) and after weaning (D29). Data are expressed as LS-means&#8201;+&#8201;SE (AP, n&#8201;=&#8201;20; LP, n&#8201;=&#8201;17; HP, n&#8201;=&#8201;20). Significant differences between diet groups are indicated by asterisk (* <it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05; Tukey-Kramer test).</p>
</text><graphic file="1746-6148-8-232-3"/></fig><p>The lymphocyte proliferation in response to both mitogens ConA and LPS was not influenced by maternal diet and diet&#8201;&#215;&#8201;sampling time interaction (<it>P</it>&#8201;&gt;&#8201;0.21). There was an effect of sampling time for proliferation indices in mitogen-stimulated cultures (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.01). The Tukey-Kramer procedure revealed in AP piglets that the ConA-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation was significantly higher on D29 than D27 (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.001, Figure&#8201;<figr fid="F4">4</figr>A).</p>
				<fig id="F4"><title><p>Figure 4</p></title><caption><p>Lymphocyte proliferation indices (PI) in response to ConA (A) and LPS (B) in weaned piglets.</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Lymphocyte proliferation indices (PI) in response to ConA (A) and LPS (B) in weaned piglets.</b> Piglets were born to sows fed adequate (AP, 12.1%), low (LP, 6.5%) and high (HP, 30%) protein levels throughout gestation. Blood samples were taken before (D27) and after weaning (D29). Data are expressed as LS-means&#8201;+&#8201;SE (AP, n&#8201;=&#8201;20; LP, n&#8201;=&#8201;17; HP, n&#8201;=&#8201;20). Significant differences between diet groups are indicated by asterisks (*** <it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.001; Tukey-Kramer test).</p>
</text><graphic file="1746-6148-8-232-4"/></fig><p>No significant effects of maternal diet and interaction diet&#8201;&#215;&#8201;sampling time were found for the percentages of CD4<sup>+</sup> and CD8<sup>+</sup> cells or their ratio (<it>P</it>&#8201;&gt;&#8201;0.12), but these blood parameters were affected by sampling time (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.01). For the percentage of CD4<sup>+</sup> cells and the CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> ratio, the Tukey-Kramer test indicated an increase in HP piglets (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05, Figure&#8201;<figr fid="F5">5</figr>A and <it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.01, Figure&#8201;<figr fid="F5">5</figr>C, respectively). None of these variables was significantly affected by sex (<it>P</it>&#8201;&gt;&#8201;0.28).</p>
				<fig id="F5"><title><p>Figure 5</p></title><caption><p>Percentages of peripheral blood CD4+ cells (A), CD8+ cells (B) and CD4+/CD8+ ratios (C) in weaned piglets.</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Percentages of peripheral blood CD4+ cells (A), CD8+ cells (B) and CD4+/CD8+ ratios (C) in weaned piglets. </b>Piglets were born to sows fed adequate (AP, 12.1%), low (LP, 6.5%) and high (HP, 30%) protein levels throughout gestation. Blood samples were taken before (D27) and after weaning (D29). Data are expressed as LS-means&#8201;+&#8201;SE (AP, n&#8201;=&#8201;20; LP, n&#8201;=&#8201;17; HP, n&#8201;=&#8201;20). Significant differences between diet groups are indicated by asterisks (* <it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05, ** <it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.01; Tukey-Kramer test).</p>
</text><graphic file="1746-6148-8-232-5"/></fig>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Effects of maternal diet on offspring response to LPS challenge</p>
				</st><p>Intraperitoneal injection of 100 &#956;g LPS/kg body weight induced significant increases in the plasma concentration of TNF-&#945; 1 h later (Figure&#8201;<figr fid="F6">6</figr>B) and in concentrations of cortisol (Figure&#8201;<figr fid="F6">6</figr>A), IL-6 (Figure&#8201;<figr fid="F6">6</figr>C) and IL-10 (Figure&#8201;<figr fid="F6">6</figr>D) 3 h after LPS in piglets on day 47 (<it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.001). However, only IL-6 concentration was influenced by both maternal diet and diet&#8201;&#215;&#8201;sampling time interaction (P&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05). Three hours after the challenge, LP and HP piglets responded to LPS with higher IL-6 concentrations than AP piglets (P&#8201;=&#8201;0.09 and P&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.01, respectively). Furthermore, LP piglets showed higher IL-10 levels compared with AP piglets (P&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05). No significant effects of sex were observed (<it>P</it>&#8201;&gt;&#8201;0.21).</p>
				<fig id="F6"><title><p>Figure 6</p></title><caption><p>Plasma cortisol (A), TNF-&#945; (B), IL-6 (C) and IL-10 (D) concentrations in pigs challenged with LPS.</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Plasma cortisol (A), TNF-&#945; (B), IL-6 (C) and IL-10 (D) concentrations in pigs challenged with LPS. </b>Piglets were born to sows fed adequate (AP, 12.1%), low (LP, 6.5%) and high (HP, 30%) protein levels throughout gestation. On D47, piglets received an i.p. injection of LPS from <it>Escherichia coli </it>(serotype O111:B4) at a dose of 100 &#956;g/kg of body weight. Blood samples were taken before (0 h) and after LPS challenge (1 h, 3 h, 6 h). Data are expressed as LS-means&#8201;+&#8201;SE (AP, n&#8201;=&#8201;15; LP, n&#8201;=&#8201;18; HP, n&#8201;=&#8201;9). Significant differences between diet groups are indicated by asterisks (* <it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05, ** <it>P</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.01; Tukey-Kramer test).</p>
</text><graphic file="1746-6148-8-232-6"/></fig>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Discussion</p>
			</st><p>In animals and humans, a number of studies have indicated that dietary composition plays an important role in the immune system <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B31">31</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Increased attention is now being focused on the effects of nutritional factors during pregnancy on immune competence and health of the offspring. The present study demonstrates for the first time that both low and high protein:carbohydrate ratios in the diets fed to primiparous sows throughout pregnancy affect baseline immune parameters in neonatal offspring and modify immune responses to challenges later in life.</p><p>In late pregnancy, the LP diet caused lower protein concentrations in serum compared with AP and HP sows, an effect which is manifested by protein malnutrition <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. As also shown in our investigation, concentrations of immunoglobulins are often unaffected by this type of malnutrition <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Moreover, the changes in IgG, IgM and IgA serum levels we observed in sows at different stages of pregnancy had similar patterns to those previously described by Klobasa et al. <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>Because of the structure of the epitheliochorial porcine placenta, neonatal piglets acquire maternal immunity soon after birth by absorbing intact immunoglobulins from ingested colostrum for humoral immune protection. The amount of immunoglobulin uptake by the suckling piglet mainly depends on the concentration of immunoglobulins in colostrum, the intestinal capacity to absorb macromolecules prior to gut closure, the time to first suckle, and the colostrum intake <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. In the present study, piglets born to sows receiving limited or excess dietary protein during pregnancy displayed lower serum immunoglobulin levels on the first day of life compared with those from mothers fed an adequate protein diet. Indeed, we did not find significant differences in colostral immunoglobulin concentrations between the sows fed different dietary protein levels <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The majority of prenatal stress research indicates that physiological alterations in prenatally stressed offspring can be attributed to the action of maternal glucocorticoids <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Previous studies in pigs have shown that prenatal stress during the late phase of gestation also decreased the circulating IgG levels in neonates <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B39">39</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. An increase in maternal cortisol during late gestation may accelerate foetal gut maturation and thereby impair the acquisition of colostral immunoglobulins after birth <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B40">40</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Interestingly, although cortisol levels were significantly increased only in LP sows at the end of pregnancy, we found strong inverse relationships between the plasma cortisol levels in both LP and HP sows on D108 of gestation and the serum levels of total protein and IgA in their offspring on the first day of life. Thus, an altered permeability of the gut in neonates of sows fed diets with inadequate protein levels could explain the decreased immunoglobulin concentrations in the piglets<it>.</it> In a previous experiment using the same dietary treatments as in this study, we found that both LP and HP diets alter materno-foetal HPA regulation <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B41">41</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Thus, it appears that maternal glucocorticoids are involved in mediating the effects of imbalanced nutrition during pregnancy in pigs on the immunity of offspring. Furthermore, a suboptimal intake of colostrum may result in an inadequate transfer of maternal immunoglobulins to the newborn and thereby also contribute to pre-weaning mortality <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B42">42</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Although piglets of the LP and HP groups showed lower serum immunoglobulin levels in the early postnatal period, we detected a higher mortality rate only in the LP group during the suckling period. As discussed by Le Dividich et al. <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, reduced immunoglobulin concentrations do not always lead to an increased risk of mortality if piglets receive an adequate intake of colostrum. While early postnatal vitality was not measured in our study, LP piglets exhibited the lowest muscle mass at birth <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, and we found that their early weight gain was significantly lower than that of AP and HP piglets. From these results, we hypothesise that LP piglets may have consumed less colostrum over the first hours after birth, which, together with their low birth weight, decreased vitality and increased pre-weaning mortality risk. However, besides immunoglobulins, it is known that several other components of colostrum and milk such as hormones, growth factors and cytokines may play an important role in the physiological development and immune protection of neonatal piglets <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B43">43</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B44">44</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. A major finding from the present study is that both limited and excess protein in the maternal diet during pregnancy caused reduced humoral immunity in neonatal piglets that was not evident in older pigs. Indeed, these transient early modifications could also alter the immune-reactivity towards infections later in life <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B45">45</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>Previous studies in pigs have reported that gestational stress in sows may activate the HPA axis in offspring during novel or challenging situations <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> and may also affect the immunity of neonatal pigs in response to stressful stimuli <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B46">46</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. In our study, piglets from sows fed diets with limited protein levels during pregnancy showed increased basal cortisol levels one day after weaning, whereas cortisol levels in HP piglets were only slightly increased or unaltered in AP piglets. After LPS challenge, there was no effect of inadequate dietary protein to carbohydrate ratios on cortisol release. This finding is in accordance with the results of de Groot et al. <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> and Couret et al. <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, where prenatal stress also did not affect cortisol levels of piglets in response to LPS. The differences in cortisol release after weaning and LPS administration in the present study may be due to the different nature of the stressors. It seems that the HPA axis of LP piglets is more sensitive to weaning stress with abrupt social, nutritional, and environmental changes, whereas cortisol release after LPS challenge reflects an immunological stress. Therefore, we conclude that elevated cortisol concentrations in LP sows at the end of pregnancy can affect HPA activity in offspring, especially in response to a multifactorial stress such as weaning.</p><p>Our results revealed a significant increase in ConA-stimulated cell proliferation after weaning in piglets of AP sows that may indicate a more effective cellular immune response <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B47">47</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B48">48</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Together with the unaltered cortisol level, the higher <it>in vitro</it> lymphocyte function in AP piglets may be considered as a greater ability to cope with weaning stress <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B49">49</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Furthermore, the percentage of CD4<sup>+</sup> cells and thereby the CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> ratios were significantly increased after the stress of weaning in HP piglets only. These findings are comparable with frequently reported changes in lymphocyte subpopulations after sustained stress. A long-term dexamethasone treatment of weanling piglets resulted in a higher percentage of CD4<sup>+</sup> cells <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B50">50</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, and chronic stress in sheep and humans has been shown to increase the CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> ratio in peripheral blood <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B51">51</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B52">52</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B53">53</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The rise in CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> ratio may reflect recovery of immune competence in an attempt to restore homeostasis following a stressful event. Although some caution must be exercised in interpreting our results, the changes in distribution of CD4<sup>+</sup> and CD8<sup>+</sup> cells in HP piglets could indicate the extent of T-lymphocyte recovery due to the severity of weaning stress perceived by these piglets.</p><p>In the present study, pigs of all diet groups responded to intraperitoneal LPS administration with elevations in cortisol and cytokine levels in similar temporal patterns that were appropriate for acute gram-negative infection <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B54">54</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B55">55</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. However, the levels of circulating IL-6 were higher in LP and HP piglets compared to AP piglets, and LP piglets additionally showed a higher increase in IL-10. From previous research in pigs it is known that prenatal stress may also alter physiological responsiveness of offspring to an immune stimulation with LPS. De Groot et al. <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> suggested that the non-specific inflammatory response to an LPS challenge increased in piglets from sows treated with cortisol during pregnancy, and it was recently shown that maternal restraint stress during gestation in pigs enhanced the magnitude of the TNF-&#945; and IL-6 responses to LPS in the offspring <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. In our study, the increased inflammatory cytokine responses in piglets exposed to inadequate maternal protein-to-carbohydrate levels <it>in utero</it> confirm these results and support the hypothesis that maternal stress or malnutrition during pregnancy can influence aspects of immune responses in the offspring to challenges.</p><p>In humans, elevated levels of IL-6, a predominantly pro-inflammatory cytokine, have been identified as a marker of disease risk and dysregulated inflammation <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B56">56</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B57">57</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Focussing on the highly increased IL-6 levels in LP and HP offspring 3 h after LPS injection, these piglets appear to be more susceptible to bacterial endotoxin exposure with an increased risk of an acute systemic inflammatory response syndrome <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B58">58</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. This interpretation may be supported by the magnitude of TNF-&#945; response observed in these pigs 1 h after LPS. Moreover, the higher release of peripheral IL-10 in LP and HP pigs at the same time as IL-6 may emphasise the crucial role of IL-10 in regulating inflammatory responses <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B59">59</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B60">60</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Although the LPS challenge is a simplified inflammation model, the present results suggest that such alterations in cytokine release can be disadvantageous for recovery from frequently occurring bacterial infections of the gastrointestinal and respiratory system in pigs.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Conclusions</p>
			</st><p>The present results demonstrate that both low and high protein:carbohydrate ratios in the diets fed to pregnant sows moderately decrease humoral immunity in neonatal offspring, modify adaptive responses to cope with weaning stress in piglets and cause dysregulation in inflammatory cytokine responses to acute LPS challenges later in life. Thus, inadequate protein and carbohydrate supplies during pregnancy can induce short-term as well as long-lasting effects on immune responses in piglets, and thereby may impair defences against potential pathogens in the offspring. The present findings highlight the importance of adequate maternal macronutrient ratios during foetal life to promote the immune competence and adaptive stability of progeny and to improve animal health and welfare.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Abbreviations</p>
			</st><p>AP: Adequate protein; ConA: Concanavalin A; GD: Gestation day; HP: High protein; LP: Low protein; LPS: Lipopolysaccharide; PBMC: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Competing interests</p>
			</st><p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Authors&#8217; contributions</p>
			</st><p>C.C.M., C.R., W.O. and M.T. designed the study, M.T., W.O., E.K., M.G. and O.B. conducted the experiment, A.T. performed statistical analyses, and M.T. wrote the paper with input from all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
		</sec>
	</bdy>
	<bm>
		<ack>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Acknowledgements</p>
				</st><p>This work was supported by a grant of the German Research Foundation (DFG), (ME 1420/8-1; OT 137/3-1; PAK 24). The authors would like to thank the staff of the Research Unit Behavioural Physiology for their technical assistance.</p>
			</sec>
		</ack>
		<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>The maternal-neonatal neuro-immune interface: are there long-term implications for inflammatory or stress-related disease?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Shanks</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Lightman</snm><fnm>SL</fnm></au></aug><source>J Clin Invest</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>108</volume><fpage>1567</fpage><lpage>1573</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">200999</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11733549</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>Glucocorticoid programming</p></title><aug><au><snm>Seckl</snm><fnm>JR</fnm></au><au><snm>Meaney</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Ann N Y Acad Sci</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>1032</volume><fpage>63</fpage><lpage>84</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1196/annals.1314.006</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15677396</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Physical and mental health outcomes of prenatal maternal stress in human and animal studies: a review of recent evidence</p></title><aug><au><snm>Beydoun</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Saftlas</snm><fnm>AF</fnm></au></aug><source>Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>22</volume><fpage>438</fpage><lpage>466</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>Impact of prenatal stress on neuroendocrine programming</p></title><aug><au><snm>Viltart</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Vanbesien-Mailliot</snm><fnm>CC</fnm></au></aug><source>Scientific World Journal</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>7</volume><fpage>1493</fpage><lpage>1537</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17767365</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Prenatal stress, fetal imprinting and immunity</p></title><aug><au><snm>Merlot</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Couret</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Otten</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>Brain Behav Immun</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>22</volume><fpage>42</fpage><lpage>51</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17716859</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>Effects of prenatal stress on corticosteroid receptors and monoamine concentrations in limbic areas of suckling piglets (Sus scrofa)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kanitz</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Otten</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Tuchscherer</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Manteuffel</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>J Vet Med A</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>50</volume><fpage>132</fpage><lpage>139</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Maternal social stress during late pregnancy affects hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function and brain neurotransmitter systems in pig offspring</p></title><aug><au><snm>Otten</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Kanitz</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Couret</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Veissier</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Prunier</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Merlot</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>Domest Anim Endocrinol</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>38</volume><fpage>146</fpage><lpage>156</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.domaniend.2009.09.002</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19879712</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>Effects of prenatal stress on cellular and humoral immune responses in neonatal pigs</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tuchscherer</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kanitz</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Otten</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Tuchscherer</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Vet Immunol Immunopathol</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>86</volume><fpage>195</fpage><lpage>203</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0165-2427(02)00035-1</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12007885</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>Maternal stress during late gestation has moderate but long-lasting effects on the immune system of the piglets</p></title><aug><au><snm>Couret</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Jamin</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Kuntz-Simon</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Prunier</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Merlot</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>Vet Immunol Immunopathol</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>131</volume><fpage>17</fpage><lpage>24</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.vetimm.2009.03.003</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19362376</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>Administration of ACTH to restrained, pregnant sows alters their pigs&#8242; hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hausmann</snm><fnm>MF</fnm></au><au><snm>Carroll</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au><au><snm>Weesner</snm><fnm>GD</fnm></au><au><snm>Daniels</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Matteri</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au><au><snm>Lay</snm><fnm>DC</fnm><suf>Jr</suf></au></aug><source>J Anim Sci</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>78</volume><fpage>2399</fpage><lpage>2411</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10985416</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>Programming the offspring of the pig by prenatal social stress: neuroendocrine activity and behaviour</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jarvis</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Moinard</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Robson</snm><fnm>SK</fnm></au><au><snm>Baxter</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Ormandy</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Douglas</snm><fnm>AJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Seckl</snm><fnm>JR</fnm></au><au><snm>Russell</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au><au><snm>Lawrence</snm><fnm>AB</fnm></au></aug><source>Horm Behav</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>49</volume><fpage>68</fpage><lpage>80</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.05.004</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15961089</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>Response to LPS in female offspring from sows treated with cortisol during pregnancy</p></title><aug><au><snm>de Groot</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Kranendonk</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Fillerup</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Hopster</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Boersma</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Hodgson</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>van Reenen</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Taverne</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Physiol Behav</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>90</volume><fpage>612</fpage><lpage>618</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.11.013</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17261319</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>Effect of maternal restraint stress during gestation on temporal lipopolysaccharide-induced neuroendocrine and immune responses of progeny</p></title><aug><au><snm>Collier</snm><fnm>CT</fnm></au><au><snm>Williams</snm><fnm>PN</fnm></au><au><snm>Carroll</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au><au><snm>Welsh</snm><fnm>TH</fnm><suf>Jr</suf></au><au><snm>Laurenz</snm><fnm>JC</fnm></au></aug><source>Domest Anim Endocrinol</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>40</volume><fpage>40</fpage><lpage>50</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.domaniend.2010.08.005</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2996048</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20932703</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Response of fetal and newborn piglets to maternal protein restriction during early or late pregnancy</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pond</snm><fnm>WG</fnm></au><au><snm>Maurer</snm><fnm>RR</fnm></au><au><snm>Mersmann</snm><fnm>HJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Cummins</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Growth Dev Aging</source><pubdate>1992</pubdate><volume>56</volume><fpage>115</fpage><lpage>127</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">1428413</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>Limited and excess dietary protein during gestation affects growth and compositional traits in gilts and impairs offspring fetal growth</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rehfeldt</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Lang</snm><fnm>IS</fnm></au><au><snm>G&#246;rs</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Hennig</snm><fnm>U</fnm></au><au><snm>Kalbe</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Stabenow</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Br&#252;ssow</snm><fnm>KP</fnm></au><au><snm>Pfuhl</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Bellmann</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>N&#252;rnberg</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Otten</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Metges</snm><fnm>CC</fnm></au></aug><source>J Anim Sci</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>89</volume><fpage>329</fpage><lpage>341</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.2527/jas.2010-2970</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20889684</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>Limited and excess protein intake of pregnant gilts differently affects body composition and cellularity of skeletal muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue of newborn and weanling piglets</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rehfeldt</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Lefaucheur</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Block</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Stabenow</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Pfuhl</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Otten</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Metges</snm><fnm>CC</fnm></au><au><snm>Kalbe</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Eur J Nutr</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>51</volume><fpage>151</fpage><lpage>165</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00394-011-0201-8</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21559991</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><title><p>Intrauterine growth retarded progeny of pregnant sows fed high protein: carbohydrate diet is related to metabolic energy deficit</p></title><aug><au><snm>Metges</snm><fnm>CC</fnm></au><au><snm>Lang</snm><fnm>IS</fnm></au><au><snm>Hennig</snm><fnm>U</fnm></au><au><snm>Br&#252;ssow</snm><fnm>KP</fnm></au><au><snm>Kanitz</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Tuchscherer</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Schneider</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Weitzel</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Steinhoff-Ooster</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Sauerwein</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Bellmann</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>N&#252;rnberg</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Rehfeldt</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Otten</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>PLoS One</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>7</volume><fpage>e31390</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0031390</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">3273459</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">22328932</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>Influence of dietary protein levels on the electrophoretic pattern and plasma IgG and IgM levels in pregnant rats and their offspring</p></title><aug><au><snm>Varela</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Mu&#241;oz-Mart&#237;nez</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Marcos</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Unzaga</snm><fnm>MT</fnm></au></aug><source>Arch Latinoam Nutr</source><pubdate>1988</pubdate><volume>38</volume><fpage>219</fpage><lpage>228</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">3154065</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>The level of protein and type of fat in the diet of pregnant rats both affect lymphocyte function on the offspring</p></title><aug><au><snm>Calder</snm><fnm>PC</fnm></au><au><snm>Yaqoob</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Nutr Res</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>20</volume><fpage>995</fpage><lpage>1005</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0271-5317(00)00190-1</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B20"><title><p>Board-invited review: intrauterine growth retardation: implications for the animal sciences</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wu</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Bazer</snm><fnm>FW</fnm></au><au><snm>Wallace</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Spencer</snm><fnm>TE</fnm></au></aug><source>J Anim Sci</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>84</volume><fpage>2316</fpage><lpage>2337</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.2527/jas.2006-156</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16908634</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p>Early identification of neonates at risk: traits of newborn piglets with respect to survival</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tuchscherer</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Puppe</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Tuchscherer</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Tiemann</snm><fnm>U</fnm></au></aug><source>Theriogenology</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>54</volume><fpage>371</fpage><lpage>388</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00355-1</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11051321</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B22"><title><p>Relationships between colostrum production by primiparous sows and sow physiology around parturition</p></title><aug><au><snm>Foisnet</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Farmer</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>David</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Quesnel</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>J Anim Sci</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>88</volume><fpage>1672</fpage><lpage>1683</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.2527/jas.2009-2562</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20118422</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B23"><title><p>A new model for the origins of chronic disease</p></title><aug><au><snm>Barker</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Med Health Care Philos</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>4</volume><fpage>31</fpage><lpage>35</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1023/A:1009934412988</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">11315417</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B24"><title><p>Nutritional programming of disease: unravelling the mechanism</p></title><aug><au><snm>Langley-Evans</snm><fnm>SC</fnm></au></aug><source>J Anat</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>215</volume><fpage>36</fpage><lpage>51</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00977.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2714637</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19175805</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B25"><title><p>Developmental programming of health and disease</p></title><aug><au><snm>Langley-Evans</snm><fnm>SC</fnm></au></aug><source>Proc Nutr Soc</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>65</volume><fpage>97</fpage><lpage>105</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1079/PNS2005478</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1885472</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16441949</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B26"><title><p>Prenatal high protein exposure decreases energy expenditure and increases adiposity in young rats</p></title><aug><au><snm>Daenzer</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Ortmann</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Klaus</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Metges</snm><fnm>CC</fnm></au></aug><source>J Nutr</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>132</volume><fpage>142</fpage><lpage>144</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11823569</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B27"><aug><au><cnm>GfE (Gesellschaft f&#252;r Ern&#228;hrungsphysiologie)</cnm></au></aug><source>Empfehlungen zur Energie- und N&#228;hrstoffversorgung von Schweinen (Recommendations of energy and nutrient intake in pigs)</source><publisher>Frankfurt am Main: DLG-Verlags-GmbH</publisher><pubdate>2006</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B28"><title><p>Changes in endocrine and immune responses of neonatal pigs exposed to a psychosocial stressor</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tuchscherer</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kanitz</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Puppe</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Tuchscherer</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Viergutz</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>Res Vet Sci</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>87</volume><fpage>380</fpage><lpage>388</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.rvsc.2009.04.010</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19433330</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B29"><title><p>Expression of sulphonylurea receptors in bovine monocytes from animals with a different metabolic rate</p></title><aug><au><snm>L&#246;hrke</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Derno</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kr&#252;ger</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Viergutz</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Matthes</snm><fnm>HD</fnm></au><au><snm>Jentsch</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>Eur J Physiol</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>434</volume><fpage>712</fpage><lpage>720</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s004240050456</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B30"><aug><au><cnm>SAS Institute Inc</cnm></au></aug><source>SAS/STAT&#174; 9.2 User&#8217;s Guide</source><publisher>NC: SAS Institute Inc, Cary</publisher><pubdate>2009</pubdate><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">23114959</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B31"><title><p>Nutrition and the immune system from birth to old age</p></title><aug><au><snm>Chandra</snm><fnm>RK</fnm></au></aug><source>Eur J Clin Nutr</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>56</volume><issue>Suppl 3</issue><fpage>73</fpage><lpage>76</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B32"><title><p>Undernutrition, infection and immune function</p></title><aug><au><snm>Calder</snm><fnm>PC</fnm></au><au><snm>Jackson</snm><fnm>AA</fnm></au></aug><source>Nutr Res Rev</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>13</volume><fpage>3</fpage><lpage>29</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1079/095442200108728981</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19087431</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B33"><title><p>Prenatal and postnatal protein malnutrition in pigs: effects on growth rate, serum protein and albumin</p></title><aug><au><snm>Atinmo</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Baldijao</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Pond</snm><fnm>WG</fnm></au><au><snm>Barnes</snm><fnm>RH</fnm></au></aug><source>J Anim Sci</source><pubdate>1976</pubdate><volume>43</volume><fpage>606</fpage><lpage>612</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">824264</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B34"><title><p>Nutrition and immunity: an overview</p></title><aug><au><snm>Chandra</snm><fnm>RK</fnm></au><au><snm>Kumari</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>J Nutr</source><pubdate>1994</pubdate><volume>124</volume><issue>Suppl 8</issue><fpage>1433</fpage><lpage>1435</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B35"><title><p>Changes in the concentrations of serum IgG, IgA and IgM of sows throughout the reproductive cycle</p></title><aug><au><snm>Klobasa</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Habe</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Werhahn</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Butler</snm><fnm>JE</fnm></au></aug><source>Vet Immunol Immunopathol</source><pubdate>1985</pubdate><volume>10</volume><fpage>341</fpage><lpage>353</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0165-2427(85)90023-6</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">3832574</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B36"><title><p>Nutritional and immunological importance of colostrum for the new-born pig</p></title><aug><au><snm>Le Dividich</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Rooke</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au><au><snm>Herpin</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>J Agric Sci</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>143</volume><fpage>469</fpage><lpage>485</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1017/S0021859605005642</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B37"><title><p>Immunoglobulins, antibody repertoire and B cell development</p></title><aug><au><snm>Butler</snm><fnm>JE</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhao</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Sinkora</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Wertz</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Kacskovics</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au></aug><source>Dev Comp Immunol</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>33</volume><fpage>321</fpage><lpage>333</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.dci.2008.06.015</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18804488</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B38"><title><p>Prenatal stress effects on pig development and response to weaning</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lay</snm><fnm>DC</fnm><suf>Jr</suf></au><au><snm>Kattesh</snm><fnm>HG</fnm></au><au><snm>Cunnick</snm><fnm>JE</fnm></au><au><snm>Daniels</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au><au><snm>McMunn</snm><fnm>KA</fnm></au><au><snm>Toscano</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Roberts</snm><fnm>MP</fnm></au></aug><source>J Anim Sci</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>86</volume><fpage>1316</fpage><lpage>1324</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.2527/jas.2007-0812</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18272847</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B39"><title><p>Immunglobulins in piglets from sows heat-stressed prepartum</p></title><aug><au><snm>Machado-Neto</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Graves</snm><fnm>CN</fnm></au><au><snm>Curtis</snm><fnm>SE</fnm></au></aug><source>J Anim Sci</source><pubdate>1987</pubdate><volume>65</volume><fpage>445</fpage><lpage>455</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">3624094</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B40"><title><p>Development of the small intestine of piglets in response to prenatal elevation of glucocorticoids</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bate</snm><fnm>LA</fnm></au><au><snm>Ireland</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Connell</snm><fnm>BJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Grimmelt</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au></aug><source>Histol Histopath</source><pubdate>1991</pubdate><volume>6</volume><fpage>207</fpage><lpage>216</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B41"><title><p>An inadequate maternal protein diet during pregnancy in pigs alters the expression of corticosteroid receptors and 11&#946;-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase isoforms in the placenta and fetal brain [abstract]</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kanitz</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Gr&#228;bner</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Tuchscherer</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Br&#252;ssow</snm><fnm>KP</fnm></au><au><snm>Stabenow</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Rehfeldt</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Metges</snm><fnm>CC</fnm></au><au><snm>Otten</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>Endocr Abstr</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>22</volume><fpage>P261</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B42"><title><p>Perinatal mortality in the pig: environmental or physiological solutions?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Edwards</snm><fnm>SA</fnm></au></aug><source>Livest Prod Sci</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>78</volume><fpage>3</fpage><lpage>12</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00180-X</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B43"><title><p>Humoral and cellular factors of maternal immunity in swine</p></title><aug><au><snm>Salmon</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Berri</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Gerdts</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Meurens</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Dev Comp Immunol</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>33</volume><fpage>384</fpage><lpage>393</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.dci.2008.07.007</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18761034</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B44"><title><p>Ultra-early weaning in piglets results in low serum IgA concentration and IL17 mRNA expression</p></title><aug><au><snm>Levast</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>de Monte</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Chevaleyre</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Melo</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Berri</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Mangin</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Zanello</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Lantier</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Salmon</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Meurens</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Vet Immunol Immunopathol</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>137</volume><fpage>261</fpage><lpage>268</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.vetimm.2010.06.004</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20591504</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B45"><title><p>Prenatal stress diminishes the cytokine response of leukocytes to endotoxin stimulation in juvenile rhesus monkeys</p></title><aug><au><snm>Coe</snm><fnm>CL</fnm></au><au><snm>Kramer</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kirschbaum</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Netter</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Fuchs</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>J Clin Endocrinol Metab</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>87</volume><fpage>675</fpage><lpage>681</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1210/jc.87.2.675</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11836303</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B46"><title><p>Repeated administrations of adrenocorticotropic hormone during gestation in gilts: effects on growth, behaviour and immune responses of their piglets</p></title><aug><au><snm>Otten</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Kanitz</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Tuchscherer</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Puppe</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>N&#252;rnberg</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Livest Sci</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>106</volume><fpage>261</fpage><lpage>270</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.livsci.2006.08.012</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B47"><title><p>Evaluation of the mitogen-induced proliferation and cell surface differentiation antigens of lymphocytes from pigs 1 to 30 days of age</p></title><aug><au><snm>Becker</snm><fnm>BA</fnm></au><au><snm>Misfeldt</snm><fnm>ML</fnm></au></aug><source>J Anim Sci</source><pubdate>1993</pubdate><volume>71</volume><fpage>2073</fpage><lpage>2078</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8376231</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B48"><title><p>Restraint stress is associated with changes in glucocorticoid immunoregulation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bauer</snm><fnm>ME</fnm></au><au><snm>Perks</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Lightman</snm><fnm>SL</fnm></au><au><snm>Shanks</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au></aug><source>Physiol Behav</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>73</volume><fpage>525</fpage><lpage>532</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00503-0</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11495656</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B49"><title><p>Perceived stress and cellular immunity: when coping counts</p></title><aug><au><snm>Stowell</snm><fnm>JR</fnm></au><au><snm>Kiecolt-Glaser</snm><fnm>JK</fnm></au><au><snm>Glaser</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>J Behav Med</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>24</volume><fpage>323</fpage><lpage>339</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1023/A:1010630801589</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">11523331</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B50"><title><p>Effects of dexamethasone on peripheral blood mononuclear cell phenotype in weanling piglets</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lo</snm><fnm>DY</fnm></au><au><snm>Lee</snm><fnm>WM</fnm></au><au><snm>Chien</snm><fnm>MS</fnm></au><au><snm>Lin</snm><fnm>CC</fnm></au><au><snm>Lee</snm><fnm>WC</fnm></au></aug><source>Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>28</volume><fpage>251</fpage><lpage>258</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.cimid.2005.03.001</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15896844</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B51"><title><p>Changes in behaviour, cortisol and lymphocyte types during isolation and group confinement of sheep</p></title><aug><au><snm>Degabriele</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Fell</snm><fnm>LR</fnm></au></aug><source>Immunol Cell Biol</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>79</volume><fpage>583</fpage><lpage>589</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1440-1711.2001.01040.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11903617</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B52"><title><p>Stress and immunity in humans: a meta-analytic review</p></title><aug><au><snm>Herbert</snm><fnm>TB</fnm></au><au><snm>Cohen</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Psychosom Med</source><pubdate>1993</pubdate><volume>55</volume><fpage>364</fpage><lpage>379</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8416086</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B53"><title><p>The relationship of depression and stressors to immunological assays: a meta-analytic review</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zorrilla</snm><fnm>EP</fnm></au><au><snm>Luborsky</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>McKay</snm><fnm>JR</fnm></au><au><snm>Rosenthal</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Houldin</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Tax</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>McCorkle</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Seligman</snm><fnm>DA</fnm></au><au><snm>Schmidt</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Brain Behav Immun</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>15</volume><fpage>199</fpage><lpage>226</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/brbi.2000.0597</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11566046</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B54"><title><p>Time course of increased plasma cytokines, cortisol, and urea nitrogen in pigs following intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharide</p></title><aug><au><snm>Webel</snm><fnm>DM</fnm></au><au><snm>Fink</snm><fnm>BN</fnm></au><au><snm>Baker</snm><fnm>DH</fnm></au><au><snm>Johnson</snm><fnm>RW</fnm></au></aug><source>J Anim Sci</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>75</volume><fpage>1514</fpage><lpage>1520</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9250511</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B55"><title><p>Temporal pattern and effect of sex on lipopolysaccharide-induced stress hormone and cytokine response in pigs</p></title><aug><au><snm>Williams</snm><fnm>PN</fnm></au><au><snm>Collier</snm><fnm>CT</fnm></au><au><snm>Carroll</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au><au><snm>Welsh</snm><fnm>TH</fnm><suf>Jr</suf></au><au><snm>Laurenz</snm><fnm>JC</fnm></au></aug><source>Dom Anim Endocrinol</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>37</volume><fpage>139</fpage><lpage>147</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.domaniend.2009.04.004</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B56"><title><p>Immune suppression and immune activation in depression</p></title><aug><au><snm>Blume</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Douglas</snm><fnm>SD</fnm></au><au><snm>Evans</snm><fnm>DL</fnm></au></aug><source>Brain Behav Immun</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>25</volume><fpage>221</fpage><lpage>229</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.bbi.2010.10.008</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">3025086</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20955778</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B57"><title><p>The social environment and IL-6 in rats and humans</p></title><aug><au><snm>Saxton</snm><fnm>KB</fnm></au><au><snm>John-Henderson</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Reid</snm><fnm>MW</fnm></au><au><snm>Francis</snm><fnm>DD</fnm></au></aug><source>Brain Behav Immun</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>25</volume><fpage>1617</fpage><lpage>1625</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.bbi.2011.05.010</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">3191259</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21640816</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B58"><title><p>Role of cytokines in sepsis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hack</snm><fnm>CE</fnm></au><au><snm>Aarden</snm><fnm>LA</fnm></au><au><snm>Thijs</snm><fnm>LG</fnm></au></aug><source>Adv Immunol</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>66</volume><fpage>101</fpage><lpage>195</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">9328641</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B59"><title><p>Interleukin-10 and the interleukin-10 receptor</p></title><aug><au><snm>Moore</snm><fnm>KW</fnm></au><au><snm>De Waal Malefyt</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Coffman</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au><au><snm>O&#8217;Garra</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Annnu Rev Immunol</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>19</volume><fpage>683</fpage><lpage>765</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.683</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B60"><title><p>IL-10 and toll-like receptor-4 polymorphisms and in vivo and ex vivo response to endotoxin</p></title><aug><au><snm>Schippers</snm><fnm>EF</fnm></au><au><snm>Van&#8217;t Veer</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Van Voorden</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Martina</snm><fnm>CAE</fnm></au><au><snm>Huizinga</snm><fnm>TWJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Le Cessie</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Van Dissel</snm><fnm>JT</fnm></au></aug><source>Cytokine</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>29</volume><fpage>215</fpage><lpage>228</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.cyto.2004.12.005</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15760678</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl></refgrp>
	</bm>
</art>