<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
	<ui>1744-8069-1-13</ui>
	<ji>1744-8069</ji>
	<fm>
		<dochead>Research</dochead>
		<bibl>
			<title>
				<p>Selective activation of primary afferent fibers evaluated by sine-wave electrical stimulation</p>
			</title>
			<aug>
				<au id="A1">
					<snm>Koga</snm>
					<fnm>Kohei</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<email>kkoga@physiol.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A2" ca="yes">
					<snm>Furue</snm>
					<fnm>Hidemasa</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<email>furueh@physiol.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A3">
					<snm>Rashid</snm>
					<fnm>Md Harunor</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<email>rashid@physiol.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A4">
					<snm>Takaki</snm>
					<fnm>Atsushi</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<email>takaki@physiol.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A5">
					<snm>Katafuchi</snm>
					<fnm>Toshihiko</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<email>kataf@physiol.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A6">
					<snm>Yoshimura</snm>
					<fnm>Megumu</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<email>yoshimum@physiol.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp</email>
				</au>
			</aug>
			<insg>
				<ins id="I1">
					<p>Department of Integrative Physiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan</p>
				</ins>
			</insg>
			<source>Molecular Pain</source>
			<issn>1744-8069</issn>
			<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
			<volume>1</volume>
			<issue>1</issue>
			<fpage>13</fpage>
			<url>http://www.molecularpain.com/content/1/1/13</url>
			<xrefbib>
				<pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmpid">15813963</pubid><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1744-8069-1-13</pubid>
				</pubidlist></xrefbib>
		</bibl>
		<history>
			<rec>
				<date>
					<day>09</day>
					<month>2</month>
					<year>2005</year>
				</date>
			</rec>
			<acc>
				<date>
					<day>25</day>
					<month>3</month>
					<year>2005</year>
				</date>
			</acc>
			<pub>
				<date>
					<day>25</day>
					<month>3</month>
					<year>2005</year>
				</date>
			</pub>
		</history>
		<cpyrt>
			<year>2005</year>
			<collab>Koga et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab>
			<note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note>
		</cpyrt>
		<abs>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Abstract</p>
				</st>
				<p>Transcutaneous sine-wave stimuli at frequencies of 2000, 250 and 5 Hz (Neurometer) are thought to selectively activate A&#946;, A&#948; and C afferent fibers, respectively. However, there are few reports to test the selectivity of these stimuli at the cellular level. In the present study, we analyzed action potentials (APs) generated by sine-wave stimuli applied to the dorsal root in acutely isolated rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) preparations using intracellular recordings. We also measured excitatory synaptic responses evoked by transcutaneous stimuli in substantia gelatinosa (SG) neurons of the spinal dorsal horn, which receive inputs predominantly from C and A&#948; fibers, using <it>in vivo </it>patch-clamp recordings. In behavioral studies, escape or vocalization behavior of rats was observed with both 250 and 5 Hz stimuli at intensity of ~0.8 mA (T5/ T250), whereas with 2000 Hz stimulation, much higher intensity (2.14 mA, T2000) was required. In DRG neurons, APs were generated at T5/T250 by 2000 Hz stimulation in A&#946;, by 250 Hz stimulation both in A&#946; and A&#948;, and by 5 Hz stimulation in all three classes of DRG neurons. However, the AP frequencies elicited in A&#946; and A&#948; by 5 Hz stimulation were much less than those reported previously in physiological condition. With <it>in vivo </it>experiments large amplitude of EPSCs in SG neurons were elicited by 250 and 5 Hz stimuli at T5/ T250. These results suggest that 2000 Hz stimulation excites selectively A&#946; fibers and 5 Hz stimulation activates noxious transmission mediated mainly through C fibers. Although 250 Hz stimulation activates both A&#948; and A&#946; fibers, tactile sensation would not be perceived when painful sensation is produced at the same time. Therefore, 250 Hz was effective stimulus frequency for activation of A&#948; fibers initiating noxious sensation. Thus, the transcutaneous sine-wave stimulation can be applied to evaluate functional changes of sensory transmission by comparing thresholds with the three stimulus frequencies.</p>
			</sec>
		</abs>
	</fm>
	<bdy>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Background</p>
			</st>
			<p>Psychophysical procedures such as the visual analogue scale are commonly used to assess human pain magnitude. However, any of those assessments seem not to be suitable for evaluation of a change in thresholds of each class of afferent fibers, despite of the fact that quantitative analysis of each afferent class is essential for understanding underlying mechanisms of pathological states and evaluation of analgesic chemicals. It now becomes evident that hyperalgesia or allodynia produced by various chronic pain conditions is due to not only a change in threshold of fine afferent fibers but also participation of large myelinated afferents in producing allodynia in inflammation and sciatic nerve transection models <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp>. Recently, one method that allows us to clarify a change in threshold of each afferent fiber quantitatively has been developed (Neurometer) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr></abbrgrp>. That is a method to measure selectively the thresholds of three classes of afferent fibers by applying transcutanous sine-wave stimulation at three frequencies of 2000, 250 and 5 Hz via surface electrodes at a current intensity in the range of 0.01&#8211;9.9 mA to the skin. Neurometer is now widely used clinically to evaluate peripheral nerve sensitization and dysfunction in various painful states, including neuropathic pain or an effect of treatment of analgesic drugs <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>. Although several lines of evidence suggest the selective stimulation of three distinct afferent fibers by Neurometer, the validity of the method at single cellular level has not been made.</p>
			<p>There are three types of sensory afferent fibers that send sensory information to the CNS; unmyelinated C fibers send a long lasting delayed painful sensation, thinly myelinated A&#948; fibers send a short and fast painful sensation and the thickly myelinated A&#946; fibers send tactile information. Several attempts have been made to identify the types of peripheral sensory fibers activated by the sine-wave stimuli using behavioral pharmacological approaches such as blockade of nerve conduction by local anesthetics or use of topical application of capsaicin, etc. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, no studies have been made to clarify the single neuronal properties such as action potential generation or its frequency of peripheral fibers. Moreover, responses of spinal dorsal horn neurons have not been examined by peripheral stimulation with Neurometer.</p>
			<p>The purpose of this study was to clarify the selectivity of the sine-wave stimuli on the activation of sensory afferent fibers in detail. First, we performed behavioral tests with Neurometer to measure the withdrawal thresholds by transcutaneous application of three frequencies of stimuli. Next, we performed intracellular recordings from acutely isolated DRG neurons with attached dorsal roots to examine firing properties of C, A&#948; and A&#946; fibers. Moreover, using <it>in vivo </it>patch-clamp recordings, we analyzed excitatory synaptic responses evoked by the transcutaneous stimuli in SG neurons.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Results</p>
			</st>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Behavioral response</p>
				</st>
				<p>We first examined the escape and/or vocalization behavior of rats to transcutaneous stimuli using Neurometer. When 250 and 5 Hz stimuli were applied to the left hind limb, rats escaped from the stimuli or vocalized. The thresholds for 250 and 5 Hz stimuli were quite similar, and were averaged to be 0.74 &#177; 0.06 mA (T250, n = 12) and 0.84 &#177; 0.12 mA (T5, n = 12), respectively. Next, 2000 Hz stimulation which is used to evaluate A&#946; fibers was applied. Although A&#946; fibers were thought to convey innocuous information, escape and/or vocalization behavior was also observed at higher intensity. The threshold for 2000 Hz stimulation (2.14 &#177; 0.28 mA, T2000, n = 12) was more than two times higher than T250 and T5.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Classification of DRG neurons</p>
				</st>
				<p>Intracellular recordings were made from 53 DRG neurons. Dorsal root stimulation with a suction electrode elicited antidromic APs with latencies in the range of 0.2 &#8211; 15.0 ms. Fast-conducting neurons had a brief action potential duration (APD), whereas slow-conducting ones had a relatively broad APD. Based on the threshold stimulus intensity (TSI), conduction velocity (CV) and APD, DRG neurons were divided into three subgroups, C, A&#948; and A&#946; fibers (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). These results were consistent with those reported previously <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
				<tbl id="T1">
					<title>
						<p>Table 1</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Comparison of electrophysiological properties of DRG neurons</p>
					</caption>
					<tblbdy cols="5">
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>RMP (mV)</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>CV (m/s)</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>TSI (mA)</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>APD (ms)</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c cspan="5">
								<hr/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>C fibers</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>-63.0 &#177; 1.5</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.6 &#177; 0.1</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>3.1 &#177; 0.5</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1.38 &#177; 0.01</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>(n = 15)</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>(51.0&#8211;74.0)</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>(0.4&#8211;0.7)</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>(2.5&#8211;4.6)</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>(0.81&#8211;2.85)</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>A&#948; fibers</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>-67.7 &#177; 2.4</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>5.9 &#177; 0.8</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1.8 &#177; 0.6</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.63 &#177; 0.05</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>(n = 18)</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>(55.0&#8211;71.0)</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>(1.4&#8211;12.5)</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>(1.6&#8211;2.1)</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>(0.30&#8211;0.99)</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>A&#946; fibers</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>-65.1 &#177; 1.8</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>19.6 &#177; 1.3</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.8 &#177; 0.2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.29 &#177; 0.01</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>(n = 20)</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>(52.0&#8211;76.0)</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>(14.1&#8211;23.4)</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>(0.04&#8211;1.34)</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>(0.19&#8211;0.43)</p>
							</c>
						</r>
					</tblbdy>
					<tblfn>
						<p>RMP, resting membrane potential; CV, conduction velocity; TSI, threshold of stimulus intensity. APD, duration of action potential measured at its half-maximal amplitude; Values are shown as means &#177; SEM.</p>
					</tblfn>
				</tbl>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Action potential generated in DRG neurons by sine-wave stimuli</p>
				</st>
				<p>After classification of DRG neurons, C, A&#948; and A&#946; neurons were stimulated by sine-wave stimuli with gradual increase in intensity using Neurometer.</p>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>2000 Hz Stimulation</p>
					</st>
					<p>As shown in figure <figr fid="F1">1A</figr>, no AP was generated even when the intensity was increased to more than 2 mA in 10 out of 15 C neurons. In the remaining 5 C neurons, one or two APs were observed at the point of intensity change at T5/T250. However, further increase in stimulus intensity did not produce any firing in these C neurons (data not shown). In all A&#948; neurons tested, phasic firing with several APs was elicited at high intensities of ~2 mA (Figure <figr fid="F1">1B</figr>). On the other hand, tonic firing which lasted throughout the stimulation was produced in all A&#946; neurons examined at near T5/T250 (Figure <figr fid="F1">1C</figr>). Figure <figr fid="F1">1D</figr> demonstrates the AP frequency plotted against stimulus intensity. The AP frequency of C neurons was near zero at intensities less than 3 mA. In A&#948; neurons, AP was elicited at 1.3 mA and the frequency was increased to ~17 Hz at 2.8 mA. In A&#946; neurons, AP was generated at 0.8 mA and the frequency increased steeply and reached ~140 Hz at the intensity of 2.7 mA. These data indicate that 2000 Hz stimulation at low intensity (near T5/250) selectively activates A&#946; neurons.</p>
					<fig id="F1">
						<title>
							<p>Figure 1</p>
						</title>
						<caption>
							<p>Representative firing patterns of C (A), A&#948; (B) and A&#946; (C) neurons in response to 2000 Hz sine-wave stimulation</p>
						</caption>
						<text>
							<p><b>Representative firing patterns of C (A), A&#948; (B) and A&#946; (C) neurons in response to 2000 Hz sine-wave stimulation. </b>In this and subsequent figures 2 and 3, the stimulus intensities were shown above the traces. Action potentials recorded from three types of afferent fibers were shown on the right of the traces. The frequencies of APs were plotted against the stimulus intensity (D). In this and subsequent figures of 2 and 3, &#9675;: C fiber (n = 15), &#9651;: A&#948; fiber (n = 18), &#9633;: A&#946; fiber (n = 20).</p>
						</text>
						<graphic file="1744-8069-1-13-1"/>
					</fig>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>250 Hz Stimulation</p>
					</st>
					<p>250 Hz stimulation at intensity below T5/T250 initiated APs in A&#948; and A&#946; neurons but not in C neurons examined (Figures <figr fid="F2">2A&#8211;C</figr>). As shown in figures <figr fid="F2">2D</figr>, the AP frequency of A&#946; and A&#948; neurons started to increase from 0.3 mA and reached plateau at 2 mA.</p>
					<fig id="F2">
						<title>
							<p>Figure 2</p>
						</title>
						<caption>
							<p>Representative firing patterns of C (A), A&#948; (B) and A&#946; (C) neurons in response to 250 Hz sine-wave stimulation</p>
						</caption>
						<text>
							<p><b>Representative firing patterns of C (A), A&#948; (B) and A&#946; (C) neurons in response to 250 Hz sine-wave stimulation. </b>The frequencies of APs were plotted against the stimulus intensity (D).</p>
						</text>
						<graphic file="1744-8069-1-13-2"/>
					</fig>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>5 Hz Stimulation</p>
					</st>
					<p>5 Hz stimulation produced tonic firing in all three classes of DRG neurons examined (Figures <figr fid="F3">3A&#8211;C</figr>). As shown figure <figr fid="F3">3D</figr>, in C neurons, APs were elicited at 0.4 mA and the frequency reached plateau at ~1 mA. In A&#948; neurons, APs were generated at 0.3 mA and the frequency reached the maximum at 0.8 mA. In A&#946; neurons, APs were produced at 0.1 mA and the frequency reached plateau at 0.2 mA. Taken together these three studies shown in figures <figr fid="F1">1</figr>,<figr fid="F2">2</figr>,<figr fid="F3">3</figr>, the data indicate that C fibers are activated only by 5 Hz stimulation among the three specific frequencies.</p>
					<fig id="F3">
						<title>
							<p>Figure 3</p>
						</title>
						<caption>
							<p>Representative firing patterns of C (A), A&#948; (B) and A&#946; (C) neurons in response to 5 Hz sine-wave stimulation</p>
						</caption>
						<text>
							<p><b>Representative firing patterns of C (A), A&#948; (B) and A&#946; (C) neurons in response to 5 Hz sine-wave stimulation. </b>The frequencies of APs were plotted against the stimulus intensity (D).</p>
						</text>
						<graphic file="1744-8069-1-13-3"/>
					</fig>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Excitatory synaptic responses evoked in SG neurons <it>in vivo </it>by cutaneous noxious stimuli</p>
				</st>
				<p>It is well known that SG neurons in the spinal dorsal horn receive synaptic inputs predominantly from C and A&#948; fibers <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp>. Therefore, SG is thought to be specifically implicated in nociceptive processing. As shown previously <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr></abbrgrp>, SG neurons exhibited miniature and spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs and sEPSC, respectively) under voltage-clamp condition at a holding potential of -70 mV. The large amplitude of EPSCs were reversibly blocked by TTX (1 &#956;M) applied to the surface of the spinal cord leaving mEPSCs intact (data not shown). Therefore, the large amplitude of EPSCs (sEPSCs) were mediated by spontaneous firings of primary afferents or interneurons. Pinch stimulation applied to the skin of the hind limb produced a barrage of EPSCs (defined as evoked EPSCs; eEPSCs) in all 24 SG neurons examined (Figure <figr fid="F4">4</figr>).</p>
				<fig id="F4">
					<title>
						<p>Figure 4</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>EPSCs in SG neurons occurring spontaneously and in response to pinch stimulation <it>in vivo </it>(A)</p>
					</caption>
					<text>
						<p><b>EPSCs in SG neurons occurring spontaneously and in response to pinch stimulation <it>in vivo </it>(A). </b>Pinch stimulation was applied to the skin of the hind limb. EPSCs indicated by arrowheads and pinch-evoked EPSCs were shown an expanded time scale in B and C, respectively.</p>
					</text>
					<graphic file="1744-8069-1-13-4"/>
				</fig>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Excitatory synaptic responses evoked in SG neurons <it>in vivo </it>by transcutaneous sine-wave stimuli</p>
				</st>
				<p>When the sine-wave stimuli was applied to the skin of the receptive field, 250 and 5 Hz stimuli evoked a barrage of EPSCs at a stimulus intensity of ~0.8 mA (Figures <figr fid="F5">5A</figr> and <figr fid="F5">5B</figr>). On the other hand, SG neurons showed an increase in frequency of large amplitude of EPSCs with 2000 Hz stimulation at higher intensities (Figure <figr fid="F5">5C</figr>) in spite of few inputs from A&#946; fibers to SG, suggesting that the EPSCs elicited by 2000 Hz stimulation were mediated by the activation of A&#948; afferents. Figure <figr fid="F5">5D</figr> shows the frequency of eEPSCs (&gt; 50 pA) evoked at the behavioral thresholds of the three stimuli. The average frequency of 5 Hz-evoked EPSCs at the behavioral threshold was increased to 378 &#177; 30 % of control (1.8 &#177; 0.3 Hz, n = 7) and that of 250 Hz-evoked EPSCs to 473 &#177; 69 % (2.9 &#177; 0.7 Hz, n = 8), and that of 2000 Hz-evoked EPSCs to 602 &#177; 198 % (2.9 &#177; 0.8 Hz at the behavioral threshold T2000, n = 6). The large amplitude EPSCs evoked by sine-wave stimuli were blocked by TTX (1 &#956;M) and all EPSCs were abolished by a glutamatergic AMPA receptor antagonist CNQX (20 &#956;M; Figures <figr fid="F6">6A</figr> and <figr fid="F6">6B</figr>).</p>
				<fig id="F5">
					<title>
						<p>Figure 5</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>EPSCs in SG neurons evoked by 5 (A), 250 (B) and 2000 (C) Hz transcutaneous sine-wave stimuli</p>
					</caption>
					<text>
						<p><b>EPSCs in SG neurons evoked by 5 (A), 250 (B) and 2000 (C) Hz transcutaneous sine-wave stimuli. </b>In A-C, the stimulus intensities were shown above the traces. Lower two records in <it>A </it>were shown in an expanded time scale. Relative frequencies of large amplitude of EPSCs evoked by the stimuli at intensities of T5, T250 or T 2000 (D). <it>*P &lt; 0.05</it>, **<it>P &lt; 0.01</it>.</p>
					</text>
					<graphic file="1744-8069-1-13-5"/>
				</fig>
				<fig id="F6">
					<title>
						<p>Figure 6</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>EPSCs in SG neurons recorded in the presence of TTX (1 &#956;M, A) or CNQX (20 &#956;M, B)</p>
					</caption>
					<text>
						<p>EPSCs in SG neurons recorded in the presence of TTX (1 &#956;M, A) or CNQX (20 &#956;M, B).</p>
					</text>
					<graphic file="1744-8069-1-13-6"/>
				</fig>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Discussion</p>
			</st>
			<p>The present study demonstrates that 2000 Hz sine-wave stimulation activates selectively A&#946; fibers, and 250 and 5 Hz stimuli excite noxious transmission to SG neurons mediated mainly through A&#948; and C fibers, respectively, though 250 Hz stimulation also activates A&#946; fibers. Our study is the first to examine the selective activation of sensory transmission by the sine-wave stimuli at the cellular level, and the results support that transcutaneous sine-wave stimuli can be applied to examine clinically the changes of threshold in each subtype of afferent fibers following pathological conditions or after treatment with analgesics based on the combination of three sine-wave stimuli.</p>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Activation of nociceptive transmission by sine-wave stimulation</p>
				</st>
				<p>We observed that the stimulus thresholds producing the escape and/or vocalization behavior in rats with 250 and 5 Hz stimuli were not significantly different, whereas the threshold for 2000 Hz stimulation was two times higher than those of 250 and 5 Hz stimuli. The values of these thresholds are consistent with those of previous study <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp>. These observations suggest that transcutaneous stimuli at frequency of 250 and 5 Hz induce pain sensation, and the 2000 Hz stimulation may also induce pain at higher intensity. From the analysis in C and A&#948; fibers, which predominantly convey noxious information, we found that 5 Hz stimuli activated both C and A&#948; fibers, 250 Hz stimulation activated only A&#948; at low intensity (~0.8 mA). Interestingly, A&#948; fibers were also activated by 2000 Hz stimulation, although 2000 Hz stimulation is thought to activate A&#946; fibers. However, the activation of A&#948; fibers by 2000 Hz was observed only at high stimulus intensity (&gt; 2 mA). In <it>in vivo </it>analysis of EPSCs evoked in SG neurons, which receive monosynaptic inputs predominantly from C and A&#948; fibers <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp>, we found that 2000, 250 and 5 Hz stimuli significantly increased the frequency of evoked EPSCs at their behavioral thresholds. Therefore, these results indicate that 250 and 5 Hz stimuli, produce nociceptive responses by activation of A&#948; fibers and by activation of C and A&#948; fibers, respectively. On the other hand, 2000 Hz stimulation at high intensity could activate A&#948; fibers and thus initiate noxious sensation. There was no significant difference in the frequencies of EPSCs evoked by 250, 5 and 2000 Hz stimuli at the behavioral threshold (Figure <figr fid="F5">5D</figr>). In the previous behavioral pharmacological study, topical application of capsaicin to the skin, a specific desensitizer of small fibers <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>, increased behavioral thresholds for 250 and 5 Hz but not 2000 Hz stimuli, indicating that 250 and 5 Hz stimuli activate small fibers <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp>. This observation is consistent with our results.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Discharge ability of sensory fibers</p>
				</st>
				<p>We observed that C fibers were activated only by 5 Hz stimulation with a maximum frequency of ~3 Hz, A&#948; fibers were activated by 250 and 5 Hz (maximum frequency of ~22 Hz with 250 Hz stimulation) and A&#946; fibers were activated by all three stimuli (maximum frequency of ~140 Hz with 2000 Hz stimulation, Figures <figr fid="F1">1</figr>,<figr fid="F2">2</figr>,<figr fid="F3">3</figr>). One of the most important factors for affecting the maximum frequency of sensory fibers is the inactivation of voltage-dependent sodium channels. In other words, discharge frequency of fibers is controlled by the time taken to recover the sodium channels from their inactivation state. Recent studies have shown that TTX-sensitive sodium channels expressed in large diameter DRG neurons exhibit faster recovery from the inactivation than the TTX-resistant ones expressed in small DRG neurons <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr><abbr bid="B28">28</abbr><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr></abbrgrp>. Therefore, it can be speculated that high frequency sine-wave stimuli are unable to initiate APs in small C fibers due to slow repriming of TTX-resistant sodium channels.</p>
				<p>Passive membrane property is also an important factor for the ability of neurons to discharge. Previous report has shown that the membrane properties of the three subgroups of rat DRG neurons were varied <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr></abbrgrp>. In particular, the membrane time constant of C neurons (6.5 ms) is much longer than those of A&#948; (2.6 ms) and A&#946; (1.8 ms) neurons. On the other hand, the durations of single sine-wave stimuli at frequencies of 2000 Hz and 250 Hz are 0.5 ms and 4 ms, respectively. The membrane time constant is the time required for the voltage change across the membrane to reach ~63% of its final value <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr></abbrgrp>. Therefore, the longer membrane time constant might contribute to the failure of AP in C neurons with 2000 and 250 Hz stimuli, since the membrane potential is slowly depolarized, resulting that the membrane potential can not reach AP threshold within the short depolarizing cycles with the high frequency stimuli as compared to 5 Hz one. In C fiber of rat DRG neurons, AP failure was increased when repetitive stimulation was applied at high frequencies <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>. Consistent with the lines of evidence, in the present study, there was no firing in most C fibers with 250 Hz and 2000 Hz stimuli even when the high intensity stimuli were applied as described in the results.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Selectivity of specific frequencies of sine-wave stimuli to activate primary afferents</p>
				</st>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>2000 Hz Stimulation</p>
					</st>
					<p>We found that 2000 Hz stimulation selectively activated A&#946; fibers at low intensity (&lt; 2 mA). Only at higher intensities (&gt; 2 mA), 2000 Hz stimulation produced APs in A&#948; fibers. On the other hand, 2000 Hz stimulation increased EPSC frequency in SG neurons, which are known to receive a few A&#946; inputs, at higher stimulus intensity. Therefore, it is conceivable that EPSCs in SG neurons by 2000 Hz stimulation at higher intensities are produced predominantly by activation of A&#948; fibers.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>250 Hz Stimulation</p>
					</st>
					<p>250 Hz stimulation produced APs in A&#948; fibers (with a max discharge frequency of 22.3 &#177; 5.9 Hz) and A&#946; fibers (with a max discharge frequency of 133.4 &#177; 13.3 Hz). These values of AP frequencies were consistent with those evoked by physiological stimuli <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr></abbrgrp>. These results suggest that 250 Hz stimulation initiates both nociceptive sensation via A&#948; fibers and tactile sensation via A&#946; fibers. However, in general when both painful and tactile sensations are produced simultaneously, the painful sensation would only be perceived. Therefore, 250 Hz is thought to be effective stimulus frequency for activation of A&#948; fibers initiating noxious sensation.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>5 Hz Stimulation</p>
					</st>
					<p>The present study showed that C fibers were activated only by 5 Hz stimulation, but not by other stimulus frequencies. This indicates that 5 Hz stimulation is effective to activate C fibers among the three specific frequencies. Although both A&#948; and A&#946; fibers were also activated by 5 Hz stimulation, it is conceivable that the activation of A&#948; or A&#946; fibers by 5 Hz stimulation does not reach sufficient frequency to induce functional sensation. In the present study with 5 Hz stimulation, the maximum AP frequencies were ~3 Hz in C fibers, ~4 Hz in A&#948; fibers and ~20 Hz in A&#946; fibers (Figures <figr fid="F1">1</figr>,<figr fid="F2">2</figr>,<figr fid="F3">3</figr>). On the other hand, it has been reported that AP frequencies produced by natural physiological stimuli in rat DRG neurons are: ~5 Hz in C fibers by mechanical nociceptive stimuli, ~15 Hz in A&#948; fibers by high threshold mechanical stimuli and ~100 Hz in A&#946; fibers by slowly adapting tactile stimuli <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr></abbrgrp>. Although the AP frequency by 5 Hz stimulation in C fibers in our results was almost similar to the value of AP frequency in C fibers by natural mechanical noxious stimulation, the AP frequencies in A&#948; and A&#946; fibers by the 5 Hz stimulation were much less than those produced by natural stimuli. Furthermore, the number of C fibers in rat DRG neurons is quite larger than those of A&#948; and A&#946; fibers (C fiber, ~63%; A&#948; fiber; ~25%; A&#946; fiber, ~12%) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
					<p>Based on the present observations, the following analysis could be made (Figure <figr fid="F7">7</figr>). 2000 Hz sine-wave stimulation selectively activates A&#946; afferents. This result could make it possible to analyze a change in threshold of A&#946; afferent. If this stimulation protocol could produce pain sensation, it would be suggested that tactile stimuli produce pain, i.e. allodynia. 250 Hz stimulation activates both A&#948; and A&#946; fibers. In combination with 2000 Hz stimulation, a change of threshold in A&#948; afferent could be examined. However, a substantial number of A&#948; afferents convey non-noxious sensation, and therefore, it will be difficult to differentiate convincingly whether a change in sensitivity of A&#948; afferent causes allodynia or hyperalgesia. Although, 5 Hz stimulation activates not only C but also A&#948; and A&#946; afferents, a change in C afferent threshold could be analyzed by excluding A&#946; and A&#948; afferent changes which can be performed by both 2000 and 250 Hz stimuli.</p>
					<fig id="F7">
						<title>
							<p>Figure 7</p>
						</title>
						<caption>
							<p>Schematic diagram of activation of afferent fibers with sine-wave stimuli</p>
						</caption>
						<text>
							<p><b>Schematic diagram of activation of afferent fibers with sine-wave stimuli. </b>The pie showed the number of three types of rat DRG neurons as reported by Djouhri et al [32]. The height represented normalized AP frequencies produced by sine-wave stimuli in the three types of fibers in our study relative to those by natural stimuli reported previously [31]. This figure shows the selectivity of the sine-wave stimuli to activate afferent fibers as described in 'Discussion'.</p>
						</text>
						<graphic file="1744-8069-1-13-7"/>
					</fig>
					<p>In conclusion, we provided electrophysiological evidence that the sine-wave stimulation could differentiate changes in threshold of A&#946;, A&#948; and C afferent fibers by combining data obtained from 2000, 250 and 5 Hz stimulus protocol. This analysis using Neurometer would be useful for understanding not only changes in primary afferent fibers due to pathological conditions but also the evaluation of clinical treatment of analgesics.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Methods</p>
			</st>
			<p>All experiments involving the <it>in vivo </it>study were approved by the Committee of the Ethics on Animal Experiments of Kyushu University and conducted in accordance with the Guiding Principles of the Care and Use of Animals in the Field of Physiological Science of the Physiological Society of Japan.</p>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Animals and Behavioral test</p>
				</st>
				<p>Male Sprague-Dawley rats (6&#8211;9-week old), weighing 250&#8211;300 g were used for behavioral tests, intracellular recordings and <it>in vivo </it>patch-clamp recordings. A skin patch dispersion electrode was fixed to attach the skin of left hind limb of rats. Transcutaneous nerve stimuli were applied through this electrode using the nociceptive mode of the Neurometer<sup>&#174; </sup>(NUROTRON INCORPORATED, Baltimore, USA). In this mode, the intensity was automatically increased in step from 0 to 9.99 mA (29 steps for 5 Hz stimulation, 20 steps for 250 Hz and 2000 Hz stimuli). The durations were 2.5 sec for 5 Hz and 2.1 sec for 250 Hz and 0.72 sec for 2000 Hz stimuli. When rats escaped and/or vocalized, the stimulation was immediately stopped and the stimulus intensity was defined as behavioral threshold.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Intracellular recording from DRG neurons</p>
				</st>
				<p>The methods used for the current experiment were similar to those described previously <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>. Under anesthesia with diethyl ether, a rat was decapitated and the lumbar laminectomy was performed. L4-6 DRGs with an attached proximal dorsal root were isolated from the animal. The isolated DRG was submerged in Krebs solution (in mM: NaCl 117, KCl 3.6, CaCl<sub>2 </sub>2.5, MgCl<sub>2 </sub>1.2, NaH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4 </sub>1.2, NaHCO<sub>3 </sub>2.5 and glucose 11) equilibrated with 95% O<sub>2</sub>-5% CO<sub>2 </sub>and maintained at 36 &#177; 1&#176;C and set in a recording chamber. Intracellular recordings of APs were made from DRG neurons with glass-microelectrodes having a DC tip resistance of 50&#8211;100 M&#937;, filled with 4 M potassium-acetate. Signals were amplified with a high input-impedance bridge amplifier (Axoclamp 2B; Axon Instruments, Foster City CA, USA). Artifacts were minimized with low-pass (1000 Hz) or notch (250 Hz) filters using pCLAMP program (Axon Instruments). Data from neurons with resting membrane potentials less than &#8211; 50 mV and AP amplitudes smaller than 60 mV were excluded in the present study. AP duration was determined at half of the peak amplitude of the AP. Antidromic stimulation (duration 100 &#956;sec) was given to the central end of the dorsal root with a suction electrode. The stimulus intensity was monitored with a digitized output isolator (ss-202J; Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan). The value of conduction velocity was calculated from the latency of AP and the length of the dorsal root retained.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p><it>In vivo </it>patch-clamp recording from SG in dorsal horn</p>
				</st>
				<p>The methods for <it>in vivo </it>patch-clamp recording from SG neurons have been described in detailed elsewhere <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr></abbrgrp>. Briefly, under artificial ventilation, a lumbar laminectomy was performed at the level of L4&#8211;L5 and the animal was then placed in a stereotaxic apparatus (Model ST-7, Narishige, Japan). Under a binocular microscope with &#215;8 ~ &#215; 40 magnification, the dura mater was cut and reflected, and then either L4 or L5 dorsal root was shifted laterally using a glass hook. The pia-arachnoid membrane was cut to make a window to allow the patch electrode into the spinal cord. The patch pipette had a tip resistance of 8&#8211;10 M&#937; when filled with a solution of the following composition (in mM): Cs<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4 </sub>110, CaCl<sub>2 </sub>0.5, MgCl<sub>2 </sub>2, EGTA 5, HEPES 5, Mg-ATP 5, tetraethylammonium 5. Signals were acquired with an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments), low-pass-filtered at 5 kHz. Data were analyzed using Axograph program (Axon Instruments). The surface of the exposed spinal cord was perfused with Krebs solution equilibrated with 95% O<sub>2</sub>-5% CO<sub>2 </sub>at 38 &#177; 0.5&#176;C. Drugs were dissolved in Krebs solution and applied to the perfusing line. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings could be obtained from <it>in vivo </it>preparations for more than 8 hours and stable recordings were made from single SG neurons for up to 2 hours. After the end of the experiments the animals were killed by exanguination.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Statistical analysis</p>
				</st>
				<p>Data were presented as mean &#177; SEM. Statistical significance was determined as <it>P </it>&lt; 0.05 using Dunnett's multiple comparison.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
	</bdy>
	<bm>
		<ack>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Acknowledgements</p>
				</st>
				<p>We thank Dr. K. Honda for technical advice with behavioral test, and Dr. J. Yagi and Dr. H. Inokuchi for useful advice on intracellular recording analysis. We also thank Asahikasei Pharma Corporation to provide a Neurometer. This study was supported by the Grants-in Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture to M.Y. and H.F. and in part by a Grant-in-aid for the 21<sup>st </sup>Century COE Program of Japan.</p>
			</sec>
		</ack>
		<refgrp>
			<bibl id="B1">
				<title>
					<p>Plastic changes in sensory inputs to rat substantia gelatinosa neurons following peripheral inflammation</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Nakatsuka</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Park</snm>
						<fnm>JS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kumamoto</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Tamaki</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yoshimura</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Pain</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<volume>82</volume>
				<fpage>39</fpage>
				<lpage>47</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00037-8</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10422658</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B2">
				<title>
					<p>Functional reorganization of sensory pathways in the rat spinal dorsal horn following peripheral nerve injury</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Okamoto</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Baba</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Goldstein</snm>
						<fnm>PA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Higashi</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shimoji</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yoshimura</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>532</volume>
				<issue>1</issue>
				<fpage>241</fpage>
				<lpage>250</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0241g.x</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11283238</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B3">
				<title>
					<p>Peripheral nerve injury triggers central sprouting of myelinated afferents</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Woolf</snm>
						<fnm>CJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shortland</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Coggeshall</snm>
						<fnm>RE</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nature</source>
				<pubdate>1992</pubdate>
				<volume>355</volume>
				<fpage>75</fpage>
				<lpage>78</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/355075a0</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">1370574</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B4">
				<title>
					<p>Technology review: the neurometer&#174; current perception threshold (CPT)</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Baquis</snm>
						<fnm>GD</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Muscle Nerve</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<volume>22</volume>
				<fpage>523</fpage>
				<lpage>531</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199904)22:4&lt;523::AID-MUS16&gt;3.0.CO;2-1</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10204790</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B5">
				<title>
					<p>Neuroselective quantification of allodynia by current perception threshold evaluation on CRPS (RSD) patients</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Dinh</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Marroquin</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Raj</snm>
						<fnm>PP</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Reg Anesth</source>
				<pubdate>1997</pubdate>
				<volume>22</volume>
				<issue>2S</issue>
				<fpage>44</fpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B6">
				<title>
					<p>New screening device for assessment of peripheral neuropathy</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Katims</snm>
						<fnm>JJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Naviasky</snm>
						<fnm>EH</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ng</snm>
						<fnm>LKY</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rendell</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bleecker</snm>
						<fnm>ML</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Occup Med</source>
				<pubdate>1986</pubdate>
				<volume>28</volume>
				<fpage>1219</fpage>
				<lpage>1221</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">3027284</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B7">
				<title>
					<p>Current perception thresholds: a new, quick, and reproducible method for the assessment of peripheral neuropathy in diabetes mellitus</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Masson</snm>
						<fnm>EA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Veves</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Fernando</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Boulton</snm>
						<fnm>AJM</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Diabetologia</source>
				<pubdate>1989</pubdate>
				<volume>32</volume>
				<fpage>724</fpage>
				<lpage>728</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF00274531</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">2591640</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B8">
				<title>
					<p>A correlative electrophysiologic study of nerve fiber involvement in carpal tunnel syndrome using current perception thresholds</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Nishimura</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ogura</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hase</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Makinodan</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hojo</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Katsumi</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yagi</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mikami</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kubo</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Clinical Neurophysiol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>115</volume>
				<issue>8</issue>
				<fpage>1921</fpage>
				<lpage>1924</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.clinph.2004.03.022</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B9">
				<title>
					<p>Current perception threshold: A new method for the assessment of peripheral sensory neuropathy in diabetes mellitus</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Suzuki</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Chung</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kobayashi</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Goto</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Peripher Nerve</source>
				<pubdate>1995</pubdate>
				<volume>6</volume>
				<fpage>63</fpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B10">
				<title>
					<p>Neurometer measurement of current stimulus threshold in rats</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Kiso</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nagakura</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Toya</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Matsumoto</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Tamura</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ito</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Okada</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yamaguchi</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Pharmacol Exp Ther</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>297</volume>
				<fpage>352</fpage>
				<lpage>356</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11259562</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B11">
				<title>
					<p>Quantitative assessment of differential sensory nerve block after lidocaine spinal anesthesia</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Liu</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kopacz</snm>
						<fnm>DJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Carpenter</snm>
						<fnm>RL</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Anesthesiology</source>
				<pubdate>1995</pubdate>
				<volume>82</volume>
				<fpage>60</fpage>
				<lpage>63</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/00000542-199501000-00009</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">7832336</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B12">
				<title>
					<p>Quantitative and fiber-selective evaluation of dose-dependent nerve blockade by intrathecal lidocaine in rats</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Oda</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kitagawa</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yang</snm>
						<fnm>BX</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Totoki</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Morimoto</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Pharmacol Exp Ther</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>312</volume>
				<issue>3</issue>
				<fpage>1132</fpage>
				<lpage>1137</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1124/jpet.104.076893</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15572650</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B13">
				<title>
					<p>Baclofen inhibits more effectively C-afferent than A&#948;-afferent glutamatergic transmission in substantia gelatinosa neurons of adult rat spinal cord slices</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Ataka</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kumamoto</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shimoji</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yoshimura</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Pain</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>86</volume>
				<fpage>273</fpage>
				<lpage>282</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00255-4</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10812257</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B14">
				<title>
					<p>Conduction velocity is related to morphological cell type in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Harper</snm>
						<fnm>AA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lawson</snm>
						<fnm>SN</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>1985</pubdate>
				<volume>359</volume>
				<fpage>31</fpage>
				<lpage>46</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">3999040</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B15">
				<title>
					<p>Electrical properties of rat dorsal root ganglion neurons with different peripheral nerve conduction velocities</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Harper</snm>
						<fnm>AA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lawson</snm>
						<fnm>SN</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>1985</pubdate>
				<volume>359</volume>
				<fpage>47</fpage>
				<lpage>63</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">2987489</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B16">
				<title>
					<p>The electrophysiological properties of rat primary afferent neurones with carbonic anhydrase activity</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Prabhaker</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lawson</snm>
						<fnm>SN</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>1995</pubdate>
				<volume>482</volume>
				<issue>3</issue>
				<fpage>609</fpage>
				<lpage>622</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">7738851</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B17">
				<title>
					<p>Electrophysiological properties of neurons in intact rat dorsal root ganglia classified by conduction velocity and action potential duration</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Villiere</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>McLachlan</snm>
						<fnm>EM</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Neurophysiol</source>
				<pubdate>1996</pubdate>
				<volume>76</volume>
				<issue>3</issue>
				<fpage>1924</fpage>
				<lpage>1941</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8890304</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B18">
				<title>
					<p>Excitation of marginal and substantia gelatinosa neurons in the primate spinal cord: Indications of their place in dorsal horn functional organization</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Kumazawa</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Perl</snm>
						<fnm>ER</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Comp Neur</source>
				<pubdate>1978</pubdate>
				<volume>177</volume>
				<fpage>417</fpage>
				<lpage>434</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/cne.901770305</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">412881</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B19">
				<title>
					<p>Central projections of identified, unmyelinated (C) afferent fibers innervating mammalian skin</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Sugiura</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lee</snm>
						<fnm>CL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Perl</snm>
						<fnm>ER</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Science</source>
				<pubdate>1986</pubdate>
				<volume>234</volume>
				<fpage>358</fpage>
				<lpage>361</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">3764416</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B20">
				<title>
					<p>Primary afferent-evoked synaptic responses and slow potential generation in rat substantia gelatinosa neurons in vitro</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Yoshimura</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Jessell</snm>
						<fnm>TM</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Neurophysiol</source>
				<pubdate>1989</pubdate>
				<volume>62</volume>
				<fpage>96</fpage>
				<lpage>108</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">2754484</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B21">
				<title>
					<p>Sensory processing and functional reorganization of sensory transmission under pathological conditions in the spinal dorsal horn</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Furue</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Katafuchi</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yoshimura</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Neurosci Res</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>48</volume>
				<fpage>361</fpage>
				<lpage>368</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.neures.2003.12.005</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15041189</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B22">
				<title>
					<p>Responsiveness of rat substantia gelatinosa neurons to mechanical but not thermal stimuli revealed by <it>in vivo </it>patch-clamp recording</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Furue</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Narikawa</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kumamoto</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yoshimura</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<volume>521</volume>
				<issue>2</issue>
				<fpage>529</fpage>
				<lpage>535</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.00529.x</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10581321</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B23">
				<title>
					<p>In vivo patch-clamp analysis of IPSCs evoked in rat substantia gelatinosa neurons by cutaneous mechanical stimulation</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Narikawa</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Furue</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kumamoto</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yoshimura</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Neurophysiol</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>84</volume>
				<fpage>2171</fpage>
				<lpage>2174</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11024105</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B24">
				<title>
					<p>Actions of noradrenaline on substantia geltatinosa neurones in the rat spinal cord revealed by <it>in vivo </it>patch recording</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Sonohata</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Furue</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Katafuchi</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yasaka</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Doi</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kumamoto</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yoshimura</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>555</volume>
				<issue>2</issue>
				<fpage>515</fpage>
				<lpage>526</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1113/jphysiol.2003.054932</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14673188</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B25">
				<title>
					<p>Role of capsaicin-sensitive nociceptors in cutaneous pain and secondary hyperalgesia</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Magerl</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Fuchs</snm>
						<fnm>PN</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Meyer</snm>
						<fnm>RA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Treede</snm>
						<fnm>RD</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Brain</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>124</volume>
				<fpage>1754</fpage>
				<lpage>1764</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/brain/124.9.1754</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11522578</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B26">
				<title>
					<p>Upregulation of a silent sodium channel after peripheral, but not central, nerve injury in DRG neurons</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Black</snm>
						<fnm>JA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cummins</snm>
						<fnm>TR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Plumpton</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Chen</snm>
						<fnm>YH</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hormuzdiar</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Clare</snm>
						<fnm>JJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Waxman</snm>
						<fnm>SG</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Neurophysiol</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<volume>82</volume>
				<fpage>2776</fpage>
				<lpage>2785</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10561444</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B27">
				<title>
					<p>Down-regulation of TTX-resistant sodium currents and upregulation of a rapidly repriming TTX-sensitive sodium current in small spinal sensory neurons after nerve injury</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Cummins</snm>
						<fnm>TR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Waxman</snm>
						<fnm>SG</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Neurosci</source>
				<pubdate>1997</pubdate>
				<volume>17</volume>
				<fpage>3503</fpage>
				<lpage>3514</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9133375</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B28">
				<title>
					<p>Characterization of TTX-sensitive and TTX-resistant sodium currents in small cells from adult rat dorsal root ganglia</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Elliott</snm>
						<fnm>AA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Elliott</snm>
						<fnm>JR</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>1993</pubdate>
				<volume>463</volume>
				<fpage>39</fpage>
				<lpage>56</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">8246189</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B29">
				<title>
					<p>Sodium currents of large (A&#946;-type) adult cutaneous afferent dorsal root ganglion neurons display rapid recovery from inactivation before and after axotomy</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Everill</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cummins</snm>
						<fnm>TR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Waxman</snm>
						<fnm>SG</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kocsis</snm>
						<fnm>JD</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Neuroscience</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>106</volume>
				<fpage>161</fpage>
				<lpage>169</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00258-5</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11564426</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B30">
				<title>
					<p>Electronic Properties of Axon and Dendrites</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Shepherd</snm>
						<fnm>GM</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Fundamental Neuroscience</source>
				<publisher>San Diego: Academic Press</publisher>
				<editor>Squire LR, Bloom FE, McConnell SK, Roberts JL, Spitzer NC, Zigmond MJ</editor>
				<edition>2</edition>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<fpage>115</fpage>
				<lpage>137</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B31">
				<title>
					<p>Discharge patterns of afferent cutaneous nerve fibers from the rat's tail during prolonged noxious mechanical stimulation</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Handwerker</snm>
						<fnm>HO</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Anton</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Reeh</snm>
						<fnm>PW</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Exp Brain Res</source>
				<pubdate>1987</pubdate>
				<volume>65</volume>
				<issue>3</issue>
				<fpage>493</fpage>
				<lpage>504</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF00235972</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">3556477</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B32">
				<title>
					<p>The TTX-resistant sodium channel Nav1.8 (SNS/PN3): expression and correlation with membrane properties in rat nociceptive primary afferent neurons</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Djouhri</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Fang</snm>
						<fnm>X</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Okuse</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wood</snm>
						<fnm>JN</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Berry</snm>
						<fnm>CM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lawson</snm>
						<fnm>SN</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>550</volume>
				<issue>3</issue>
				<fpage>739</fpage>
				<lpage>752</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1113/jphysiol.2003.042127</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12794175</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
		</refgrp>
	</bm>
</art>
