<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>1476-7120-4-34</ui>
   <ji>1476-7120</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Research</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Evaluation of ultrasound lung comets by hand-held echocardiography</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1">
               <snm>Bedetti</snm>
               <fnm>G</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>bedetti@osp.imola.it</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A2">
               <snm>Gargani</snm>
               <fnm>L</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
               <email>gargani@ifc.cnr.it</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A3">
               <snm>Corbisiero</snm>
               <fnm>A</fnm>
               <insr iid="I3"/>
               <email>bisturi78@yahoo.it</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A4">
               <snm>Frassi</snm>
               <fnm>F</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
               <email>frassi@ifc.cnr.it</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A5">
               <snm>Poggianti</snm>
               <fnm>E</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
               <email>poggianti@ifc.cnr.it</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A6" ca="yes">
               <snm>Mottola</snm>
               <fnm>G</fnm>
               <insr iid="I3"/>
               <email>mottola.gaetano@virgilio.it</email>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1">
               <p>Imola Hospital, Imola, Italy</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I2">
               <p>CNR, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I3">
               <p>Montevergine Clinic, Mercogliano, Italy</p>
            </ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Cardiovascular Ultrasound</source>
         <issn>1476-7120</issn>
         <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
         <volume>4</volume>
         <issue>1</issue>
         <fpage>34</fpage>
         <url>http://www.cardiovascularultrasound.com/content/4/1/34</url>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubidlist>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">16945139</pubid>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1476-7120-4-34</pubid>
            </pubidlist>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <rec>
            <date>
               <day>29</day>
               <month>4</month>
               <year>2006</year>
            </date>
         </rec>
         <acc>
            <date>
               <day>31</day>
               <month>8</month>
               <year>2006</year>
            </date>
         </acc>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>31</day>
               <month>8</month>
               <year>2006</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
      <cpyrt>
         <year>2006</year>
         <collab>Bedetti et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab>
         <note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note>
      </cpyrt>
      <abs>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Abstract</p>
            </st>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Background</p>
               </st>
               <p>Ultrasound lung comets (ULCs) are a clinically useful sign of extravascular lung water. They require very limited technology (2 D-echo), and a short learning curve.</p>
               <p>The aim of the present study is to compare ULCs information obtained by experienced echocardiologists using a full feature echocardiographic platform and by inexperienced sonographers using a hand-held echocardiography system.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Methods</p>
               </st>
               <p>20 consecutive in-hospital patients underwent, within 15' and in random order, 2 ultrasound examinations for ULCs by 2 observers with different specific expertise and different technology: 1) "high-tech veteran": ULCs assessment with full feature echocardiographic platform (HP Sonos 7500 Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA, USA) by a trained echocardiologist, with &#8805;2 years expertise in ULCs assessment and accredited by the European Association of Echocardiography; 2) and a "low-tech beginner": ULCs assessment with hand-held echocardiography (Optigo; Philips, Andover, MA) by an echocardiographer with very limited (30') dedicated training on ULCs assessment.</p>
               <p>In each patient, ULC score was obtained by summing the number of comets from each of the scanning spaces in the anterior right and left hemithorax, from the second to the fifth intercostal space.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Results</p>
               </st>
               <p>There was a significant, tight correlation (r = .958, p &lt; 0.001) between the 2 observations in the same patient by "high-tech veteran" and "low-tech beginner".</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Conclusion</p>
               </st>
               <p>ULCs are equally reliable in the hands of highly experienced echocardiologists using full feature echocardiographic platforms and in the hands of absolute beginners with miniaturized, compact, and battery-equipped echocardiographic systems. From the technological and expertise viewpoint, ULCs are the "kindergarten" of echocardiography, ideally suited for bedside evaluation of patients with both known or suspected heart failure.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
      </abs>
   </fm>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Background</p>
         </st>
         <p>The interstitial pulmonary oedema is a key parameter in the management of patients with chronic heart failure and an early warning sign of impending acute heart failure <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>. The objective diagnosis is traditionally based on chest radiographic findings which, when performed at the bedside, may be difficult to interpret, and may have weak correlations with extravascular lung water <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp>. The lung is considered poorly accessible using ultrasound since air prevents the progression of the ultrasound beam with production of reverberation artefacts under the lung surface <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr></abbrgrp>. The "comet-tail image" is an echographic image detectable at bedside with ultrasound probes positioned over the chest <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp>. This image consists of multiple comet tails fanning out from the lung surface originating from water-thickened interlobular septa. Functionally, they are a sign of distress of the alveolar-capillary membrane, often associated with reduced ejection fraction and increased pulmonary wedge pressure and they probably represent an ultrasonic equivalent of radiologic Kerley B-lines <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp>. These features make ultrasound lung comets (ULCs) an appealing simple clinically useful sign for detecting and quantifying extravascular lung water <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp> in patients with known or suspected heart failure.</p>
         <p>ULCs require very limited technology (2 D-echo, without Doppler functions or second harmonic option) and a short learning curve. Recently, hand-held echocardiography with compact, low cost, miniaturized, battery-driven ultrasound imaging system has became available <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>The aim of our study is to compare the number of ULCs obtained by an experienced echocardiologist using a full feature echocardiographic platform and inexperienced sonographer using hand-held echocardiography and to evaluate the learning curve, the feasibility and the time needed for the echo lung examination.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Methods</p>
         </st>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Patients population</p>
            </st>
            <p>Twenty consecutive in-hospital patients (age 66 &#177; 12 years; 18 men), admitted to the cardio-pulmonary department of the Institute of Clinical Physiology, CNR in Pisa, have been included in the study.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Echocardiography study</p>
            </st>
            <p>All patients underwent, within 15' and in random order, 2 ultrasound examinations for specific ULCs imaging by 2 observers utilizing different technology and with different expertise: 1) "high-tech veteran": ULCs assessment with a full feature echocardiographic platform (HP Sonos 7500 Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA, USA) by a trained echocardiologist, with &#8805;2 years expertise in ULCs assessment and accredited by European Association of Echocardiography; 2) "low-tech beginner": ULCs assessment with hand-held echocardiography (Optigo; Philips, Andover, MA) by an echocardiographer with very limited (30') dedicated training on ULCs assessment.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Chest ultrasound</p>
            </st>
            <p>The ULC was defined as a hyperechogenic, coherent bundle with narrow basis spreading from the transducer to the further border of the screen <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>. The ULC described here extends to the edge of the screen and arises only from the pleural line. The echographic examinations are performed with patients in the supine or near-supine position (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). Ultrasound scanning of the anterior and lateral chest is obtained on the right and left hemitorax, from the second to fourth (on the right side to the fifth) intercostal spaces, and from parasternal line to midaxillary line. In each intercostal space, the number of ULCs was recorded at the parasternal, midclavear, anterior and middle axillary lines <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp>. The sum of the ULCs yielded a score denoting the extent of the extravascular fluid of the lung. Zero was defined as a complete absence of ULCs on the investigated area <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>. Observers were unaware of one another's results and ULCs measurements were independent of one another.</p>
            <fig id="F1">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 1</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Echographic examinations are performed with patients in the supine or near-supine position</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p>Echographic examinations are performed with patients in the supine or near-supine position.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1476-7120-4-34-1"/>
            </fig>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Statistics</p>
            </st>
            <p>Data are expressed as mean &#177; 1 standard deviation for continuous variables. The correlation between the measurements of the two observers was analyzed by two-tailed Pearson bivariate correlation. The statistical analyses of the data has been performed with SPSS for Windows (version 13.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois). A p value &lt; 0.05 was considered to be significant.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Results</p>
         </st>
         <p>A total of 20 paired observations have been obtained for all the enrolled patients. The feasibility of the chest ultrasound examination for the diagnosis of ULCs was 100%. The time needed for the echo lung examination was &lt;3 minutes in all patients. A significant (&lt;5) number ULCs have been observed in 17 patients, while 3 patients showed a number of comets &lt;5. The mean value of ULCs was 35.7 &#177; 25.30; and 34.2 &#177; 26.8 for the low tech beginner. Two examples of two representative patients with and without ULCs, are shown in Figures <figr fid="F2">2</figr> and <figr fid="F3">3</figr>, respectively. The appearance and numbers was similar with the hand-held echocardiography (Fig. <figr fid="F2">2</figr> and <figr fid="F3">3</figr>, lower panels) and with the full feature echocardiographic platform (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr> and <figr fid="F3">3</figr>, upper panels). There was a tight and highly significant correlation between the 2 observations in the same patient by the "high-tech veteran" and the "low-tech beginner" (Figure <figr fid="F4">4</figr>).</p>
         <fig id="F2">
            <title>
               <p>Figure 2</p>
            </title>
            <caption>
               <p>Example of patients without ULCs</p>
            </caption>
            <text>
               <p>Example of patients without ULCs.</p>
            </text>
            <graphic file="1476-7120-4-34-2"/>
         </fig>
         <fig id="F3">
            <title>
               <p>Figure 3</p>
            </title>
            <caption>
               <p>Example of patients with ULCs</p>
            </caption>
            <text>
               <p>Example of patients with ULCs.</p>
            </text>
            <graphic file="1476-7120-4-34-3"/>
         </fig>
         <fig id="F4">
            <title>
               <p>Figure 4</p>
            </title>
            <caption>
               <p>Graph showing the significant correlation between the 2 observations in the same patient by the "high-tech veteran" and the "low-tech beginner"</p>
            </caption>
            <text>
               <p>Graph showing the significant correlation between the 2 observations in the same patient by the "high-tech veteran" and the "low-tech beginner".</p>
            </text>
            <graphic file="1476-7120-4-34-4"/>
         </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Discussion</p>
         </st>
         <p>ULCs are based on the principle that ultrasound is reflected by an interface between different acoustic impedance. In normal conditions, the ultrasound beam finds the lung air (ie, high impedance and no acoustic mismatch on its pathway through the chest) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp>. In the presence of extravascular lung water, the ultrasound beam finds sub-pleural interlobular septa thickened by oedema (ie, a low impedance structure surrounded by air and with a high acoustic mismatch). The reflection of the beam creates a phenomenon of reverberation. The result is a wedge &#8211; shaped signal with a narrow origin in the near field of the image <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>. We have found that ULCs are equally reliable in the hands of highly experienced echocardiologist using expensive and complex technology and in the hands of absolute beginners with hand-held echocardiography. ULCs are easy both to obtain and to measure (learning curve of &lt;10 examinations, 30 minutes) and fast to perform (&lt;3 minutes), require very limited technology, even without a second harmonic or Doppler and are not restricted by cardiac acoustic window limitations or patient decubitus. The feasibility was 100%.</p>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Clinical implications</p>
            </st>
            <p>Pulmonary congestion resulting from elevated left atrial and left ventricular filling pressures appears before the onset of patient symptoms, and may provide an early warning of impending heart failure. The possibility that sufficiently accurate techniques could be used to detect pulmonary oedema even before it becomes clinically apparent "is so inherently attractive that the effort to develop and validate such techniques still continues" <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>The standard chest radiograph remains the best screening test for the detection of pulmonary oedema, but it requires radiology facilities, specific reading expertise, it uses ionising energy, and poses a significant logistic burden. ULCs assessment provides an appealing simple, non-radiologic and low cost bedside alternative to available methods and it appears to be reasonably well correlated with extra-vascular lung water assessed by chest radiography <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp> and other highly complex methods such as computerized tomography and thermodiluition techniques <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>. It is theoretically appealing for detecting and quantifying extravascular lung water, a key parameter in the serial evaluation of the cardiologic patient with heart failure <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr></abbrgrp>. It seems attractive for complement conventional Doppler-echocardiography in the fast evaluation of patients with known or suspected heart failure and dyspnoea as a presenting symptom in the emergency department (for the differential diagnosis of dyspnoea), in-hospital management (for serial evaluations in the same patient and for tailoring diuretic therapy), home care (with hand-held echocardiography), and stress echocardiography lab (as a sign of acute pulmonary congestion during stress) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Conclusion</p>
         </st>
         <p>Since the qualitative nature of the interpretation is the recognized Achilles hell of echocardiographic techniques <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>, it is especially reassuring that both the presence and extent of ULCs can be obtained with optimal precision, with very limited training, and with very basic and unsophisticated technology. From the technological and expertise viewpoint, ULCs are the "kindergarten" of echocardiography, ideally suited for bedside evaluation of patients with both known or suspected heart failure.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Abbreviations</p>
         </st>
         <p>ULCs = Ultrasound lung comets</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Competing interests</p>
         </st>
         <p>The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Authors' contributions</p>
         </st>
         <p>LG, GB and EP performed all of the ULCs assessments. AC and FF performed all the statistical analysis of the study. GM participated in the study design and coordination an helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <refgrp>
         <bibl id="B1">
            <title>
               <p>Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary (update 2005): The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Swedberg</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cleland</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dargie</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Drexler</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Follath</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Komajda</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Tavazzi</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Smiseth</snm>
                  <fnm>OA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gavazzi</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Haverich</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hoes</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jaarsma</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Korewicki</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Levy</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Linde</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lopez-Sendon</snm>
                  <fnm>JL</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nieminen</snm>
                  <fnm>MS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pierard</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Remme</snm>
                  <fnm>WJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Eur Heart J</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>26</volume>
            <fpage>1115</fpage>
            <lpage>1140</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/eurheartj/ehi166</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15901669</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B2">
            <title>
               <p>Evaluation of the portable chest roentgenogram for quantitating extravascular lung water in critically ill adults</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Halperin</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Feeley</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mihm</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <etal/>
            </aug>
            <source>Chest</source>
            <pubdate>1985</pubdate>
            <volume>88</volume>
            <fpage>649</fpage>
            <lpage>652</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">3902385</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B3">
            <title>
               <p>A prospective study of lung water measurements during patient management in an intensive care unit</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Eisenberg</snm>
                  <fnm>PR</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hansbrough</snm>
                  <fnm>JR</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Anderson</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <etal/>
            </aug>
            <source>Am Rev Respir Dis</source>
            <pubdate>1987</pubdate>
            <volume>136</volume>
            <fpage>662</fpage>
            <lpage>668</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">3307570</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B4">
            <title>
               <p>Sonographic approach to diagnosing pulmonary consolidation</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Targhetta</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Chavagneaux</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bourgeois</snm>
                  <fnm>JM</fnm>
               </au>
               <etal/>
            </aug>
            <source>J Ultrasound Med</source>
            <pubdate>1992</pubdate>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <fpage>667</fpage>
            <lpage>672</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">1494199</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B5">
            <title>
               <p>The comet-tail artifact. An ultrasound sign of alveolar-interstitial syndrome</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lichtenstein</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Meziere</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Biderman</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gepner</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Barre</snm>
                  <fnm>O</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Am J Respir Crit Care Med</source>
            <pubdate>1997</pubdate>
            <volume>156</volume>
            <fpage>1640</fpage>
            <lpage>1646</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9372688</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B6">
            <title>
               <p>Ultrasound Lung Comets: A Clinically Useful Sign of Extravascular Lung Water</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Picano</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Frassi</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Agricola</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gligorova</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gargani</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mottola</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Am Soc Echocardiogr</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>19</volume>
            <fpage>139</fpage>
            <lpage>146</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B7">
            <title>
               <p>Usefulness of ultrasound lung comets as a nonradiologic sign of extravascular lung water</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jambrik</snm>
                  <fnm>Z</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Monti</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Coppola</snm>
                  <fnm>V</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Agricola</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mottola</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Miniati</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Picano</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Am J Cardiol</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>93</volume>
            <fpage>1265</fpage>
            <lpage>1270</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.02.012</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15135701</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B8">
            <title>
               <p>Hand-held echocardiography: added value in clinical cardiological assessment</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Giannotti</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mondillo</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Galderisi</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Barbati</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zaca</snm>
                  <fnm>V</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ballo</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Agricola</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Guerrini</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Cardiovasc Ultrasound</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>3</volume>
            <fpage>7</fpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1083417</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15790409</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1476-7120-3-7</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B9">
            <title>
               <p>A lung ultrasound sign allowing bedside distinction between pulmonary edema and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the comet-tail artifact</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lichtenstein</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Meziere</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Intensive Care Med</source>
            <pubdate>1998</pubdate>
            <volume>24</volume>
            <fpage>1331</fpage>
            <lpage>1334</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s001340050771</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9885889</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B10">
            <title>
               <p>The measurement of lung water</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lange</snm>
                  <fnm>NR</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Schuster</snm>
                  <fnm>DP</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Crit Care</source>
            <pubdate>1999</pubdate>
            <volume>3</volume>
            <fpage>R19</fpage>
            <lpage>R24</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">137228</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11094478</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/cc342</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B11">
            <title>
               <p>"Ultrasound comet-tail images": a marker of pulmonary edema</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Agricola</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bove</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Oppizzi</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Marino</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zangrillo</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Marginato</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Picano</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Chest</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>127</volume>
            <fpage>1690</fpage>
            <lpage>1695</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1378/chest.127.5.1690</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15888847</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B12">
            <title>
               <p>Modern management of acute heart failure syndromes</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gheorghiade</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zannad</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Eur Heart J</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <issue>suppl B</issue>
            <fpage>B3</fpage>
            <lpage>B7</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/eurheartj/sui006</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B13">
            <title>
               <p>Clinical aspects of heart failure: high-output failure, pulmonary edema</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Givertz</snm>
                  <fnm>MM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Colucci</snm>
                  <fnm>WS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Braunwald</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Heart Disease</source>
            <publisher>Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders</publisher>
            <editor>Braunwald E, Zipes DS, Libby P</editor>
            <edition>6</edition>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <fpage>545</fpage>
            <lpage>546</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B14">
            <title>
               <p>Assessment of stress-induced pulmonary interstitial edema by chest ultrasound during exercise echocardiography and its correlation with left ventricular function</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Agricola</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Picano</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Oppizzi</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pisani</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Meris</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fragasso</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Margonato</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Am Soc Echocardiography</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>19</volume>
            <fpage>457</fpage>
            <lpage>463</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.echo.2005.11.013</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B15">
            <title>
               <p>ACC/AHA clinical competence statement on echocardiography</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Douglas</snm>
                  <fnm>PS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Foster</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gorcsan</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lewis</snm>
                  <fnm>JF</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pearlman</snm>
                  <fnm>AS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rychik</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Salcedo</snm>
                  <fnm>EE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Seward</snm>
                  <fnm>JB</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Stevenson</snm>
                  <fnm>JB</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Thys</snm>
                  <fnm>DM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Weitz</snm>
                  <fnm>HH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zoghbi</snm>
                  <fnm>WA</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Am Coll Cardiol</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>41</volume>
            <fpage>687</fpage>
            <lpage>708</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02885-1</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12598084</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B16">
            <title>
               <p>Stress echocardiography and the human factor: the importance of being export</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Picano</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lattanzi</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Orlandini</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Marini</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>L'Abbate</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Am Coll Cardiol</source>
            <pubdate>1991</pubdate>
            <volume>17</volume>
            <fpage>666</fpage>
            <lpage>669</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">1993786</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
      </refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>
