<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>1472-6750-8-10</ui>
   <ji>1472-6750</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Research article</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Improved RNA quality and TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>Pre-amplification method (PreAmp) to enhance expression analysis from formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) materials</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1">
               <snm>Li</snm>
               <fnm>Jinghuan</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>jinghual@tcd.ie</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A2">
               <snm>Smyth</snm>
               <fnm>Paul</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>smythpa@tcd.ie</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A3">
               <snm>Cahill</snm>
               <fnm>Susanne</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>sucahill@tcd.ie</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A4">
               <snm>Denning</snm>
               <fnm>Karen</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>Denningk@tcd.ie</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A5">
               <snm>Flavin</snm>
               <fnm>Richard</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>flavinr@tcd.ie</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A6">
               <snm>Aherne</snm>
               <fnm>Sinead</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>ahernesi@tcd.ie</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A7">
               <snm>Pirotta</snm>
               <fnm>Marco</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
               <email>Marco.Pirotta@eur.appliedbiosystems.com</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A8">
               <snm>Guenther</snm>
               <mi>M</mi>
               <fnm>Simone</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
               <email>Simone.M.Guenther@eur.appliedbiosystems.com</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A9">
               <snm>O'Leary</snm>
               <mi>J</mi>
               <fnm>John</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>olearyjj@tcd.ie</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A10" ca="yes">
               <snm>Sheils</snm>
               <fnm>Orla</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>osheils@tcd.ie</email>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1">
               <p>Deptment of Histopathology, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I2">
               <p>Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA</p>
            </ins>
         </insg>
         <source>BMC Biotechnology</source>
         <issn>1472-6750</issn>
         <pubdate>2008</pubdate>
         <volume>8</volume>
         <issue>1</issue>
         <fpage>10</fpage>
         <url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6750/8/10</url>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubidlist>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">18254955</pubid>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1472-6750-8-10</pubid>
            </pubidlist>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <rec>
            <date>
               <day>26</day>
               <month>7</month>
               <year>2007</year>
            </date>
         </rec>
         <acc>
            <date>
               <day>06</day>
               <month>2</month>
               <year>2008</year>
            </date>
         </acc>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>06</day>
               <month>2</month>
               <year>2008</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
      <cpyrt>
         <year>2008</year>
         <collab>Li et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab>
         <note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note>
      </cpyrt>
      <abs>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Abstract</p>
            </st>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Background</p>
               </st>
               <p>Archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues represent an abundant source of clinical specimens; however their use is limited in applications involving analysis of gene expression due to RNA degradation and modification during fixation and processing. This study improved the quality of RNA extracted from FFPE by introducing a heating step into the selected extraction protocols. Further, it evaluated a novel pre-amplification system (PreAmp) designed to enhance expression analysis from tissue samples using assays with a range of amplicon size (62&#8211;164 bp).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Results</p>
               </st>
               <p>Results from the Bioanalyzer and TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>data showed improvement of RNA quality extracted using the modified protocols from FFPE. Incubation at 70&#176;C for 20 minutes was determined to be the best condition of those tested to disrupt cross-links while not compromising RNA integrity. TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>detection was influenced by master mix, amplicon size and the incorporation of a pre-amplification step. TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>PreAmp consistently achieved decreased C<sub>T </sub>values in both snap frozen and FFPE aliquots compared with no pre-amplification.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Conclusion</p>
               </st>
               <p>Modification to extraction protocols has facilitated procurement of RNA that may be successfully amplified using QRT-PCR. TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>PreAmp system is a robust and practical solution to limited quantities of RNA from FFPE extracts.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
      </abs>
   </fm>
   <meta>
      <classifications>
         <classification type="bmc" subtype="user_supplied_xml" id="endnote"/>
      </classifications>
   </meta>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Background</p>
         </st>
         <p>Archival Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) tissue samples represent a robust and invaluable source of human tissue for gene expression analysis. Compared to fresh and snap frozen tissue, FFPE tissue has an inherent advantage in that retrospective patient data, including survival history and treatment response etc, is readily available, allowing immediate comparison with clinical pathological parameters. Data generated can potentially highlight biomarkers useful in disease classification, diagnosis and prognosis, and potentially elucidate novel therapeutic targets <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>However, these tissues have not been widely used in molecular biology due to the degradation and chemical modification of RNA extracted from FFPE blocks. RNA extracted from FFPE is degraded to fewer than 300 bases <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp> in length because archived blocks are often stored at room temperature for long periods of time. The situation is made more complicated by the fact that RNA is modified by methylol groups to form cross-links with protein or nucleic acid during formalin fixation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp>, which results in poor yields <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp> and compromised extracts.</p>
         <p>Real-time quantitative TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) analysis has been introduced as a sensitive, accurate, and highly reproducible method to study gene expression <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr></abbrgrp>. It has been successfully used to detect gene transcript levels from snap frozen tissue extracts and even from FFPE containing partially fragmented RNA <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp> although the detection rate is lower as indicated for example by invariably higher C<sub>T </sub>values in the latter <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>In this study we examined and optimized selected RNA extraction protocols, including Stratagene Absolutely RNA<sup>&#174; </sup>FFPE Kit and Ambion RecoverAll&#8482; Total Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit, by comparison of parallel extracts from FFPE and snap frozen cell preparations using a cell line model (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). We further analyzed these extracts using different TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>protocols, including two types of TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>Master Mix (Universal PCR Master Mix (UPMM) and Gene Expression Master Mix (GEMM)) and newly developed TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>with pre-amplification method (PreAmp), with a panel of assays over a range of amplicon sizes.</p>
         <fig id="F1">
            <title>
               <p>Figure 1</p>
            </title>
            <caption>
               <p>A schematic representation of the experimental procedures</p>
            </caption>
            <text>
               <p><b>A schematic representation of the experimental procedures</b>. Normal thyroid cell lines were split into two aliquots: One was snap frozen, the other formalin fixed and paraffin embedded. RNA was extracted using selected protocols and was then reverse transcribed into cDNA followed by different TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>QRT-PCR analysis.</p>
            </text>
            <graphic file="1472-6750-8-10-1"/>
         </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Results</p>
         </st>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>RNA extraction</p>
            </st>
            <p>RNA quantity was assessed spectrophotometrically using NanoDrop<sup>&#174; </sup>ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Wilmington, USA), which showed that the yields from snap frozen extracts were greater than those from FFPE when RNA was extracted from identical numbers of cells using all the protocols examined (Stratagene Absolutely RNA<sup>&#174; </sup>FFPE Kit, Ambion RecoverAll&#8482; Total Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit, Gentra Purescript<sup>&#174; </sup>RNA Purification Kit and Invitrogen Trizol<sup>&#174; </sup>Reagent). In comparison of FFPE extracts (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>), Ambion gave the highest yields, and column based Stratagene and Ambion protocols produced clean RNA with OD 260/280 ratio greater than 1.8. RNA quality was assessed using Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) and TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>RT-PCR, which showed variations in RNA quality dependant on the protocol used. Stratagene and Ambion RecoverAll&#8482; kits gave superior FFPE RNA results with regard to quality than the others examined.</p>
            <tbl id="T1">
               <title>
                  <p>Table 1</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>RNA yields from FFPE materials. Extraction products were assessed spectrophotometrically using NanoDrop<sup>&#174; </sup>ND-1000 Spectrophotometer. Three extractions were carried out using each protocol.</p>
               </caption>
               <tblbdy cols="3">
                  <r>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>OD Ratio (260/280)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>Yields (ng)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="3">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>Ambion</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>2.1 +/- 0.1</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>337 +/- 58</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>Stratagene</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>2.1 +/- 0.1</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>147 +/- 26</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>Gentra</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.6 +/- 0.1</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>186 +/- 67</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>Trizol</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.6 +/- 0.1</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>108 +/- 72</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
               </tblbdy>
            </tbl>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Evaluation of modified protocols</p>
            </st>
            <p>Modification to the Stratagene and Ambion protocols generated approximately 25&#8211;40% greater yields and larger fragments of RNA (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>) than the standard procedure. Adjustment to Stratagene and Ambion protocols produced decreased C<sub>T</sub>s (e.g. with a mean of 2.95 cycles in GEMM experiment and a mean of 3.14 cycles in PreAmp), indicating the improved quality of RNA extracted from FFPE (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>).</p>
            <fig id="F2">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 2</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Qualities of RNA were measured using Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Qualities of RNA were measured using Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer</b>. (Str = Stratagene protocol; Am = Ambion protocol; + = modified with incubation in Proteinase K buffer at 70&#176;C for 20 minutes; and SN = snap frozen.) Modification to the Stratagene and Ambion protocols generated larger fragments (lane 2 and 5) compared to the extracts generated using the original protocols (lane 1 and 4). Each well contained 1 &#956;l of extracted RNA from equal amount of starting materials of 10<sup>5 </sup>cells.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1472-6750-8-10-2"/>
            </fig>
            <fig id="F3">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 3</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>gene expression pattern using UPMM, GEMM and PreAmp</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>gene expression pattern using UPMM, GEMM and PreAmp</b>. (Str = Stratagene protocol; Am = Ambion protocol; + = modified protocols with incubation in Proteinase K buffer at 70&#176;C for 20 minutes; and SN = snap frozen cells. Not all assays produced products, e.g. HLA_A in UPMM.) C<sub>T</sub>s were higher using FFPE extracts compared to snap frozen counterparts when the amount of input RNA was identical. Modification to Stratagene and Ambion protocols produced decreased C<sub>T</sub>s. TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>with UPMM generated higher C<sub>T</sub>s than GEMM and PreAmp when using longer amplicon lengths. This was particularly evident when comparing two GAPDH assays &#8211; one 122 bp and the other 67 bp. A mean difference of 17 cycles between small and large assays using UPMM and a mean difference of 4 cycles between small and large assays using GEMM was observed.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1472-6750-8-10-3"/>
            </fig>
            <p>A separate experiment using Ambion RecoverAll&#8482; kit enabled extraction of large RNA molecules including cross-linked RNAs (Figure <figr fid="F4">4</figr>). Incubation of eluted RNA at 70&#176;C for 20 minutes was found to be the best condition to disrupt cross-links while not compromising RNA integrity in comparison with other modifications (70&#176;C for 10 min, 95&#176;C for 10 min and 95&#176;C for 20 min).</p>
            <fig id="F4">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 4</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>The effect of different incubation conditions on RNA</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>The effect of different incubation conditions on RNA</b>. Total RNA was extracted from a large number (2 &#215; 10<sup>6 </sup>cells) of formalin fixed paraffin embedded cells using Ambion RecoverAll&#8482; kit. Five eluted RNA aliquots from one extraction were subjected to different incubation conditions on a hot rack (lanes 6 to 10). In parallel, five eluted RNA aliquots from one snap frozen extraction were incubated (lane 1 to 5). Each well contained 1 &#956;l of 4 ng/&#956;l RNA in Ambion Elution Solution. Incubation conditions were as follows: 0 = no treatment; 70-10 = 70&#176;C for 10 min; 70-20 = 70&#176;C for 20 min; 95-10 = 95&#176;C for 10 min and 95-20 = 95&#176;C for 20 min. RNA from snap frozen preparations was not degraded at 70&#176;C for 20 min (lane 3), but was degraded at 95&#176;C (lane 4 and 5). RNA from FFPE showed large fragments and cross-linked RNAs which are approximately 5 kb (lane 6 &#8211; arrow). It was found that incubation of eluted RNA at 70&#176;C for 20 min is the optimal condition, among these tested, to break up cross-links while not compromising RNA integrity.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1472-6750-8-10-4"/>
            </fig>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Comparison of TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>Universal PCR Master Mix (UPMM), Gene Expression Master Mix (GEMM) and PreAmp</p>
            </st>
            <p>C<sub>T </sub>values were also dependent on the type of TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>PCR Master Mix that was used (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr> and Figure <figr fid="F5">5</figr>). TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>with UPMM generated higher C<sub>T</sub>s for long amplicons than GEMM. This was observed by a comparison of two GAPDH assays &#8211; one 122 bp and the other 67 bp. There was a mean threshold detection difference of 17 cycles using UPMM and a mean difference of 4 cycles using GEMM with RNA template extracted using Ambion RecoverAll&#8482; kit (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>). In addition, HLA_A is the largest amplicon (164 bp) which produced no product with UPMM, however, GEMM and PreAmp both allowed the detection of this amplicon size (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>). GEMM improved the C<sub>T </sub>values for long amplicons (over 100 bp) compared with UPMM (Figure <figr fid="F5">5-a</figr>). When the &#916;C<sub>T</sub>s were compared to Theoretical &#916;C<sub>T</sub>s, PreAmp results generally correlated with GEMM for all the 8 assays analyzed (Figure <figr fid="F5">5-c</figr>).</p>
            <fig id="F5">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 5</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Comparison of TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>gene expression pattern using &#916;C<sub>T </sub>method</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Comparison of TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>gene expression pattern using &#916;C<sub>T </sub>method</b>. (Am = Ambion protocol; FP = FFPE cells; + = modified protocols with incubation in Proteinase K buffer at 70&#176;C for 20 minutes; and SN = snap frozen cells. Not all assays produced products, e.g. HLA_A in UPMM.) These &#916;C<sub>T </sub>data was generated from the C<sub>T</sub>s shown in Figure 3. A Theoretical &#916;C<sub>T </sub>was calculated for each chart based on equilibrating the results for any variation in input cDNA. In panel a, &#916;C<sub>T </sub>= C<sub>T</sub>_UPMM - C<sub>T</sub>_GEMM. The Theoretical &#916;C<sub>T </sub>of UPMM-GEMM was 0 [= Log<sub>2</sub>(20 ng/20 ng)] given identical input quantities (20 ng) were used in each system. In panel b, &#916;C<sub>T </sub>= C<sub>T</sub>_UPMM - C<sub>T</sub>_PreAmp. In panel c, &#916;C<sub>T </sub>= C<sub>T</sub>_GEMM - C<sub>T</sub>_PreAmp. The Theoretical &#916;C<sub>T </sub>in panel b and c was 5.68 [= Log<sub>2</sub>(1024 ng/20 ng)], which was calculated based on an input of 1024 ng of cDNA for the TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>real time PCR component of pre-amplification process. This quantity was generated from an initial 1 ng subjected to 10 cycles of pre-amplification with a 100% efficiency and no bias introduced from the PreAmp. The relevant Theoretical &#916;C<sub>T </sub>is plotted on each chart as a reference point for measuring the actual detected &#916;C<sub>T </sub>against the theoretically optimal &#916;C<sub>T</sub>. The benefit of GEMM over UPMM was evident as amplicon size increased (Panel a). A comparison of UPMM and PreAmp showed a similar pattern (Panel b). However, PreAmp results generally correlated with GEMM regardless of amplicon size for the series of 8 assays analysed (Panel c).</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1472-6750-8-10-5"/>
            </fig>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Evaluation of TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>PreAmp using CDKN1B</p>
            </st>
            <p>TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>PreAmp analysis consistently achieved decreased C<sub>T </sub>values in both snap frozen and FFPE aliquots compared with TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>without pre-amplification step (Figure <figr fid="F5">5-b, c</figr>). A good correlation between PreAmp and UPMM was observed using CDKN1B to analyze RNA extracted with different protocols (Figure <figr fid="F6">6</figr>), suggesting that PreAmp does not introduce any bias into the reaction.</p>
            <fig id="F6">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 6</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Comparison of TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>real time PCR with or without PreAmp using CDKN1B assay on extracts produced by different extraction protocols</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Comparison of TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>real time PCR with or without PreAmp using CDKN1B assay on extracts produced by different extraction protocols</b>. (1 and 2 = Stratagene extracts; 3 and 4 = Ambion extracts; 5 and 6 = Gentra extracts; 7 and 8 = Trizol extracts; * = No amplification was achieved from FFPE) &#916;C<sub>T </sub>= C<sub>T </sub>(no_PreAmp) - C<sub>T </sub>(with_PreAmp). The Theoretical &#916;C<sub>T </sub>was 5.68 [= Log<sub>2</sub>(1024 ng/20 ng)] which was calculated based on an input of 1024 ng of cDNA for the TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>real time PCR component of pre-amplification process and 20 ng of cDNA for the TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>without pre-amplification. Ideally, &#916;C<sub>T </sub>is in a range between Theoretical &#916;C<sub>T </sub>+/- 1 which was achieved in this experiment indicating there is no bias in the PreAmp.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1472-6750-8-10-6"/>
            </fig>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Comparison of C<sub>T </sub>difference between FFPE and snap frozen cells</p>
            </st>
            <p>TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>analysis over all assays showed C<sub>T</sub>s to be 2 to 11 cycles higher when using FFPE extracts compared to snap frozen counterparts when the amounts of input RNA were identical (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>). Focussing on an analysis of GAPDH using two assays with different amplicon sizes revealed the smaller amplicon assay (67 bp) produced C<sub>T</sub>s from snap frozen and FFPE samples that were closer together (Figure <figr fid="F7">7</figr>).</p>
            <fig id="F7">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 7</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Analysis of GAPDH using two sizes of amplicon showing the difference of C<sub>T</sub>s between FFPE and snap frozen counterparts</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Analysis of GAPDH using two sizes of amplicon showing the difference of C<sub>T</sub>s between FFPE and snap frozen counterparts</b>. &#916;C<sub>T </sub>= C<sub>T </sub>(FFPE) - C<sub>T </sub>(Snap-Frozen). The smaller amplicon size of GAPDH (67 bp) generated lower &#916;C<sub>T</sub>s than the larger amplicon size of 122 bp indicating that smaller amplicon sizes produced more comparable C<sub>T</sub>s in snap frozen and FFPE samples.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1472-6750-8-10-7"/>
            </fig>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Discussion</p>
         </st>
         <p>RNA analysis has generally been performed on snap-frozen or fresh materials, using variable techniques including microarray, northern blotting and RT-PCR. However, a constant challenge has been robust and reliable analysis of gene expression in archival tissues. This application has been frustrated by poor RNA yields, small sizes of extracted fragments and low levels of detectable RNA in the extracts <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr></abbrgrp>. In this study we established a cell line model to test modified extraction protocols and quantify differences in performance using a panel of QRT-PCR assays on FFPE compared with parallel snap-frozen cell preparations using TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>methodology. We found that our modified extraction method and TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>PreAmp enhanced expression analysis from FFPE cells optimally.</p>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>RNA and FFPE</p>
            </st>
            <p>Generally, RNA extracted from FFPE materials is fragmented and chemically modified. Fragmentation occurs possibly since tissues are surgically removed, and it continuously occurs during fixation and preservation. Experimental design was such that equal numbers of cells were processed for FFPE cell block construction and snap freezing for comparative purposes. By using cells fixed under controlled conditions possible variables due to the effects of storage on RNA degradation were negated, thus revealing the true impact of formalin fixation on RNA quality. We extracted intact RNA fragments in a separate experiment from pellets with a large number of formalin fixed paraffin embedded normal thyroid cells (Figure <figr fid="F4">4</figr>), which was consistent with a finding by Scicchitana et al <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr></abbrgrp>. In that study, intact RNA molecules were extracted from newly formalin fixed paraffin embedded human bone marrow stromal cells suggesting that RNA degradation could be a minor problem for recently fixed FFPE in some types of cells. Our study showed that the differences in RNA quality between the small and large fixed pellets (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr> and Figure <figr fid="F4">4</figr>) might be due to the fact that the majority of cells in the centre of the large pellet were remained alive during construction of the large solid cell pellet. This could limit the access of RNases to intracellular mRNA because degradation will not fully occur until the fixation process begins resulting to the intact mRNA being maintained. Unfortunately, intact mRNA is not generally obtained in majority of fixed tissues or cell lines, and RNA extracted from FFPE is normally degraded to fewer than 300 bp.</p>
            <p>Figure <figr fid="F4">4</figr> displays the degree of RNA modification in FFPE cells caused by methylol groups during formalin fixation. Masuda and colleagues <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp> suggested that formaldehyde reacts with RNA forming an N-methylol followed by an electrophilic attack to form a methylene bridge between amino groups. Interestingly, our results show a clear large RNA band, approximately 5 kb in length (Figure 4-lane 6), which is hypothetically the cross-linked RNA. The other two bands visualized were also larger than that extracted from snap frozen cells indicating the modification of RNA in FFPE. Furthermore, with incubation at high temperature, the large RNA band (~5 kb) was removed, and the sizes of the other two bands became closer to 18 s and 28 s of the snap frozen extracts. This is in agreement with the results of a mass spectrometric analysis that was carried out by Masuda group, suggesting methylol modification is reversible by heating <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, a balance must be achieved between breaking cross-links while not contributing to degradation of labile RNA. Our results showed that incubation at 70&#176;C for 20 minutes was the optimal condition, among those tested, to de-modify cross-linked RNA while maintaining RNA integrity (Figure <figr fid="F4">4</figr>).</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Extraction protocols</p>
            </st>
            <p>A prerequisite for gene expression studies in formalin-fixed tissue samples was the establishment of a reliable and reproducible extraction method to provide detectable RNAs for subsequent analysis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>. The quality of extracted RNA can be variable among different extraction methods due to several factors, such as the contamination of RNases, proteins and genomic DNA <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp>. Our results showed that proteinase K digestion based protocols followed by on column DNase digestion and RNA elution produced good detectable RNA of FFPE.</p>
            <p>Proteinase K digestion has also been demonstrated by many laboratories to be critical in RNA extraction protocol <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp> possibly because of two functions. On one hand, it can degrade proteins that are covalently cross-linked with each other and nucleic acid to release RNA from the matrix, thereby allowing efficient RNA extraction from FFPE materials <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp>. On the other, it can inactivate RNases that tend to be stable and do not require cofactors to function. Thus its activity avoids any potential reactivation of RNase during reversal of fixation in aqueous buffers <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>Our data demonstrates that incubation in proteinase K buffer at 70&#176;C for 20 minutes facilitated the disruption of cross-links, resulting in improved quantity and quality of RNA. The RNA extracted using the modified protocols (with the incubation) enhanced detection by a mean of 3 cycles (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>), which is equivalent to 8 fold increased sensitivity. It is most likely that the additional incubation step removed the remaining cross-links between RNA and protein leading to the longer RNA molecules being extracted <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>. In addition, this incubation denatured proteinase K, thus avoided its further damage to RNA in the following purification procedure, which suggests the necessity of a heating (at 70&#176;C for 20 min) application in any proteinase K based extraction of FFPE samples.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>PreAmp</p>
            </st>
            <p>TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>QRT-PCR technique is based on the 5' nuclease activity of Taq DNA polymerase and involves cleavage of a specific fluorogenic hybridization probe that is flanked by PCR primers <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>. Because of the small target size, many laboratories have demonstrated that it is possible to measure gene expression levels using FFPE tissues as a source of mRNA <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp>. Still, it seems to be problematic to perform large scale of analysis on FFPE because of the high C<sub>T</sub>s and limited concentration of extracts <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>We employed a novel TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>PreAmp technique which we found to be a practical solution to decrease C<sub>T </sub>values, and in particular suitable in our hands to generate real-time PCR results from limited amounts of input RNA, such as extracted from laser captured microdissected material <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr></abbrgrp>. The principle of TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>PreAmp technique is to amplify target cDNA prior to real-time TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>PCR analysis. Briefly, cDNA is synthesized from total RNA by use of random priming. The cDNA for the specific target assays is then amplified by pre-amplification reaction using pooled gene-specific primers to increase the number of targeted copies. The pre-amplification product is diluted and finally analyzed by real-time TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>PCR using single assay containing one pair of gene-specific primers and probe.</p>
            <p>The TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>PreAmp technique addresses the challenge faced by researchers working with rare or precious samples, which only limited RNA could be extracted from, to perform gene expression analyses using real-time QRT-PCR. The simple process enables the user to perform uniform amplification from as little as one nanogram of cDNA (which was used in this study) or alternatively conduct up to 200 real-time PCR reactions per pre-amplification reaction without compromising the available sample material. Our results demonstrated that TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>PreAmp overcame the difficulties usually caused by low yields of RNA extraction from FFPE.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Influence of TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>Master Mix and amplicon length</p>
            </st>
            <p>This study demonstrated that the sensitivity of TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>detection was influenced by choice of Master Mix and amplicon length in assay design. We evaluated UPMM and GEMM which showed similar sensitivity for short amplicons (less than 90 bp), while GEMM displayed better sensitivity for longer amplicons (over 100 bp) compared with UPMM in parallel snap frozen and FFPE extracts (Figure <figr fid="F5">5</figr>). This effect was dissipated when UPMM was used after pre-amplification, possibly because of the increased copy number of template available or because of the composition of the PreAmp MasterMix which is closer in components to GEMM than UPMM. Reagents can have a significant effect on assay reproducibility <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr></abbrgrp> due to some parameters such as different polymerases sensitivity <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B28">28</abbr></abbrgrp>, primer binding efficiency and the concentration of Mg<sup>2+ </sup><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr></abbrgrp>. Karrer et al. described the Monte Carlo effect using plant material suggesting that the PCR reproducibility could be limited when the number of available templates is low. Increased concentrations of Mg<sup>2+ </sup>reduced PCR variation possibly by allowing a higher proportion of annealed primers extended by the more active polymerase <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>Our data corroborated the observation that amplicon size is crucial in designing assays to analyze gene expression levels not only using FFPE extracts but also using RNAs with high integrity <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp>. Many researchers have found that short amplicons generated lower C<sub>T</sub>s than longer amplicons on analysis of the same gene in FFPE <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr></abbrgrp>. Data generated in this study evaluating snap frozen samples using two sizes of GAPDH (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>) demonstrated GAPDH-67 generated a reduction in C<sub>T </sub>by 2 &#8211; 3 cycles over GAPDH-122 in both GEMM and PreAmp experiments, demonstrating that smaller amplicons give more consistent results <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>In addition, we found C<sub>T</sub>s between FFPE and snap frozen were closer for small amplicons than that for large amplicons (Figure <figr fid="F7">7</figr>). For example, the analysis of GAPDH using a target amplicon of 67 bp displayed C<sub>T</sub>s 1 &#8211; 2.5 cycles closer between FFPE and snap frozen than the same experiment using the longer amplicon size of 122 bp. We further measured the amplification efficiency associated with these two sizes of GAPDH assays using a broad dilution range (5 Log<sub>10</sub>s) which showed closed efficiencies with 99.98% for GAPDH-67 and 99.92% for GAPDH-122 (data not shown). This measurement eliminates non-specific amplification that could contribute to decreased amplification efficiency of the true target. Therefore, it seems reasonable to conclude that the shift of efficiency detected from frozen to fixed material (Figure <figr fid="F7">7</figr>) is due to degradation of RNA in FFPE, and logical to extrapolate that the longer an amplicon is, the more likely its template will be degraded in extracted RNA. As a general rule, house-keeping genes or normalising assays should have amplicon sizes that match the size of the target whose expression is to be measured <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp> and amplicons less than 100 bp should be employed in gene expression studies using FFPE materials.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Conclusion</p>
         </st>
         <p>We evaluated the effect of modifying recommended extraction protocols to reproducibly produce RNA that may be successfully amplified using QRT-PCR. We have found the TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>PreAmp system to be a robust and practical solution to limited quantities of RNA and have demonstrated comparable results in matched FFPE and snap frozen preparations providing proof of principle that this method may reliably be utilised in the context of multiple expression analyses from individual FFPE samples.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Methods</p>
         </st>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Cell culture and formalin fixation</p>
            </st>
            <p>Nthy-ori 3-1 (ECACC, Wiltshire, UK) is a normal thyroid follicular epithelial cell line derived from adult thyroid tissue that has been transfected with a plasmid encoding for the SV40 large T gene <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>This cell line was grown to confluence in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO<sub>2 </sub>at 37&#176;C in the following plating medium: RPMI 1640 with 2 mM L-glutamine, 10% Foetal calf serum (FCS), Penicillin (100 U/ml) and Streptomycin (100 &#956;g/ml). Tripsinized cells were counted with a hemocytometer. Approximately 1 &#215; 10<sup>5 </sup>suspended cells were aliquot and were pelleted (a) snap frozen and (b) formalin fixed and paraffin embedded into a cell block. When formalin fixation was required, a cohesive solid cell pellet was constructed using 20% agar <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>. The cells were centrifuged in an eppendorf tube, and the supernatant was removed using a pipette. Approximately 30 &#956;l of pre-warmed agar (60&#176;C) was added to each tube. The solid cell pellet was formed within a few seconds. Cell blocks were placed in 10% buffered formalin at room temperature for 5 hours followed by tissue processing on a Tissue-Tek<sup>&#174; </sup>V.I.P.TM tissue processor for 8 hours comprising: 10% buffered formalin fixation (4 hours at 37&#176;C), 60% ethanol (20 minutes at 37&#176;C), 80% ethanol (20 minutes at 37&#176;C), 100% ethanol (20 minutes at 37&#176;C), xylene (40 minutes at 37&#176;C) and paraffin (80 minutes at 60&#176;C). The pellets were subsequently paraffin embedded.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>RNA extraction protocols</p>
            </st>
            <p>RNA extraction was performed using 4 protocols (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>): Ambion RecoverAll&#8482; Total Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit, Stratagene Absolutely RNA<sup>&#174; </sup>FFPE Kit, Gentra Purescript<sup>&#174; </sup>RNA Purification Kit, and Invitrogen Trizol<sup>&#174; </sup>Reagent, in addition to modified Stratagene and Ambion protocols. Apart from deparaffinazition, RNA was extracted from snap frozen and FFPE cells in parallel according to manufacturer's protocols including proteinase K digestion (not included in Trizol<sup>&#174; </sup>protocol), RNA isolation and elution or hydration procedures. The modification in Stratagene and Ambion protocols involved incubation at 70&#176;C for 20 minutes after the recommended proteinase K digestion.</p>
            <tbl id="T2">
               <title>
                  <p>Table 2</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Overview of the RNA extraction protocols. Four RNA extraction protocols are Ambion RecoverAll&#8482; Total Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit, Stratagene Absolutely RNA<sup>&#174; </sup>FFPE Kit, Gentra Purescript<sup>&#174; </sup>RNA Purification Kit and Invitrogen Trizol<sup>&#174; </sup>Reagent. (RT. = Room temperature)</p>
               </caption>
               <tblbdy cols="5">
                  <r>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <b>Ambion</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <b>Stratagene</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <b>Gentra</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <b>Trizol</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="5">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>De-paraffiniztion</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Xylene</p>
                        <p>50&#176;C for 3 min</p>
                        <p>Ethanol washes</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Deparaffin &#8211; Reagent</p>
                        <p>RT. for 10 min</p>
                        <p>Ethanol washes</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Xylene</p>
                        <p>RT. for 5 min</p>
                        <p>Ethanol washes</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Xylene</p>
                        <p>RT. for 5 min</p>
                        <p>Ethanol washes</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>Proteinase K digestion</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>4 &#956;l Protease in 400 &#956;l digestion buffer (final concentration unknown)</p>
                        <p>50&#176;C for 3 hours</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>10 &#956;l &#215; 20 mg/ml proteinaseK in 100 &#956;l digestion buffer (final concentration 1.82 &#956;g/ul)</p>
                        <p>55&#176;C overnight</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>1.5 &#956;l &#215; 20 mg/ml proteinaseK in 300 &#956;l cell lysis solution (final concentration 0.10 &#956;g/ul)</p>
                        <p>55&#176;C overnight</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>--</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>RNA isolation</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Add Isolation Additive</p>
                        <p>Add Ethanol</p>
                        <p>Pass the mixture through a Filter Cartridge</p>
                        <p>Buffer washes</p>
                        <p>On column</p>
                        <p>DNase digestion</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Add &#946;-ME</p>
                        <p>Pass the mixture through a prefilter spin cup</p>
                        <p>Add Ethanol</p>
                        <p>Pass the mixture through a RNA binding cup</p>
                        <p>Buffer washes</p>
                        <p>On column</p>
                        <p>DNase digestion</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Add protein-DNA precipitation solution</p>
                        <p>Separate the supernatant</p>
                        <p>Add Isopropanol and Glycogen</p>
                        <p>-20&#176;C for 1 hour</p>
                        <p>Pellet RNA and Ethanol wash</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Homogenize in 1 ml Trizol Reagent</p>
                        <p>Add Chloroform</p>
                        <p>Separate the aqueous phase</p>
                        <p>Add Isopropanol and Glycogen</p>
                        <p>RT. for 10 min</p>
                        <p>Pellet RNA and Ethanol wash</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>RNA collection</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Elution buffer 30 &#956;l &#215; 2</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Elution buffer 30 &#956;l</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>RNA hydration solution 30 &#956;l</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>H<sub>2</sub>O 30 &#956;l</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
               </tblbdy>
            </tbl>
            <p>RNA quantity was assessed using the NanoDrop<sup>&#174; </sup>ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Wilmington, USA), and the quality was measured using the RNA 6000 Pico LabChip<sup>&#174; </sup>Kit on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyser (Agilent technologies, Waldbronn, Germany).</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>gene expression assays</p>
            </st>
            <p>Seven TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>Gene Expression Assays (P/N: 4331182, Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) and one custom designed assay (GAPDH-67) were utilised in this study with a range of amplicon sizes from 62 to 164 (Table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr>). The extracted RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA and were then quantified using TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>real time PCR with or without PreAmp procedure.</p>
            <tbl id="T3">
               <title>
                  <p>Table 3</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Eight of TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>Gene Expression Assays. Seven of these assays were inventoried by Applied Biosystems (P/N: 4331182, Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) and one was a designed assay (GAPDH-67 Forward primer: CAT CCA TGA CAA CTT TGG TAT CGT; Reverse primer: GGG TGG CAG TGA TGG CAT; Probe: ACT CAT GAC CAC AGT CC).</p>
               </caption>
               <tblbdy cols="3">
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Gene Symbol &#8211; Amplicon Length</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Gene Name</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Assay ID</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="3">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>MT4 &#8211; 62</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>metallothionein IV</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Hs00262914_m1</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>GAPDH &#8211; 67</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Designed</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>CDKN1B &#8211; 71</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B (p27, Kip1)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Hs00153277_m1</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>MAPK4 &#8211; 72</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>mitogen-activated protein kinase 4</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Hs00177074_m1</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>CD44 &#8211; 86</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>CD44 molecule (Indian blood group)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Hs00153304_m1</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>SDC2 &#8211; 103</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>syndecan 2 (heparan sulfate proteoglycan 1, cell surface-associated, fibroglycan)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Hs00299807_m1</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>GAPDH &#8211; 122</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Hs99999905_m1</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>HLA-A &#8211; 164</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>major histocompatibility complex, class I, A</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Hs00740413_g1</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
               </tblbdy>
            </tbl>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Reverse transcription (RT)</p>
               </st>
               <p>Applied Biosystems High-Capacity cDNA Archive Kit (P/N: 4322171, Applied Biosystems) was used following manufacturer's protocol for reverse transcription. Each RT reaction contained 50 &#956;l of 8 ng/&#956;l total RNA, 10 &#956;l of 10&#215; RT buffer, 4 &#956;l of 25&#215; dNTP mixture, 10 &#956;l of 10&#215; Random Primers, 5 &#956;l of MultiScribe RT (50 U/&#956;l) and 21 &#956;l of RNase-free water. The 100 &#956;l reactions were incubated in an Applied Biosystems Thermocycler for 10 min at 25&#176;C, 2 hours at 37&#176;C and then held at 4&#176;C.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>real time PCR</p>
               </st>
               <p>For the Real-time PCR step, amplification was carried out on the Applied Biosystems 7000 Sequence Detection System. Two types of TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>Master Mix were employed in this procedure: TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>Universal PCR Master Mix with UNG (P/N 4304437, Applied Biosystems) or TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>Gene Expression Master Mix (P/N 4370048, Applied Biosystems). The 20 &#956;l PCR reaction included 10 &#956;l of 2&#215; TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>Master Mix, 5 &#956;l of 4&#215; TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>Gene expression Assay (P/N 4331182, Applied Biosystems) and 5 &#956;l of cDNA (RT product 4 ng/&#956;l). The reactions were incubated in a 96-well optical plate at 50&#176;C for 2 min, at 95&#176;C for 10 min, following by 40 cycles of 95&#176;C for 15 seconds and 60&#176;C for 1 min. The real-time PCRs for each assay were run in triplicate.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>real time PCR with PreAmp</p>
               </st>
               <p>The preamplification was performed using TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>PreAmp Master Mix Kit protocol (P/N 4366128, Applied Biosystems). The pooled assay mix was prepared by combining 8 of 20&#215; TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>Gene Expression Assays into a single tube and using 1&#215; TE buffer to dilute the pooled assays to a final concentration of 0.2&#215;. The 40 &#956;l of preamplification reaction included 20 &#956;l of 2&#215; TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>PreAmp Master Mix, 10 &#956;l of 0.2&#215; pooled assay mix and 10 &#956;l of 4 ng/&#956;l cDNA sample. The reactions were incubated in an Applied Biosystems Thermocycler for 10 min at 95&#176;C following by 10 cycles of 95&#176;C for 15 seconds and 60&#176;C for 4 min and then held at 4&#176;C. The concentration of the preamplification product was 2<sup>10 </sup>ng/&#956;l (in theory) which was then 1:5 diluted and analyzed by TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>real time PCR using TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>Universal PCR Master Mix following the procedures described.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Data analysis</p>
            </st>
            <p>Replicates were omitted if C<sub>T </sub>standard deviation was greater than 1.5 in the triplicate. All the data were collected in Excel form. The formulas used to generate the figures are as below:</p>
            <p>1. &#916;C<sub>T </sub>(A-B) = C<sub>T </sub>X_mean(A) - C<sub>T </sub>X_mean(B)</p>
            <p>2. Theoretical &#916;C<sub>T </sub>= Log<sub>2</sub>(Amount cDNA in A/Amount of cDNA in B)</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Authors' contributions</p>
         </st>
         <p>JL performed the RNA extraction and TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>analysis and wrote original and final versions of the manuscript. PS, SC helped with the extraction and TaqMan<sup>&#174; </sup>analysis. PS, RF, KD helped draft the manuscript. KD, SA carried out cell culture. MP, SG helped with the analysis of the data. JOL and OS conceived the study and helped write the original and final versions of this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <ack>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Acknowledgements</p>
            </st>
            <p>This work was part-funded by Applied Biosystems and received technical support from the company. We would also like to thank staff in the Central Pathology Laboratory, St. James's Hospital, for assistance with fixation and processing of cell blocks.</p>
         </sec>
      </ack>
      <refgrp>
         <bibl id="B1">
            <title>
               <p>Unlocking the archive--gene expression in paraffin-embedded tissue</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lewis</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Maughan</snm>
                  <fnm>NJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Smith</snm>
                  <fnm>V</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hillan</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Quirke</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Pathol</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>195</volume>
            <issue>1</issue>
            <fpage>66</fpage>
            <lpage>71</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/1096-9896(200109)195:1&lt;66::AID-PATH921>3.0.CO;2-F</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11568892</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B2">
            <title>
               <p>Effect of fixatives and tissue processing on the content and integrity of nucleic acids</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Srinivasan</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sedmak</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jewell</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Am J Pathol</source>
            <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
            <volume>161</volume>
            <issue>6</issue>
            <fpage>1961</fpage>
            <lpage>1971</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1850907</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12466110</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B3">
            <title>
               <p>Measurement of gene expression in archival paraffin-embedded tissues: development and performance of a 92-gene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cronin</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pho</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dutta</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Stephans</snm>
                  <fnm>JC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Shak</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kiefer</snm>
                  <fnm>MC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Esteban</snm>
                  <fnm>JM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Baker</snm>
                  <fnm>JB</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Am J Pathol</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>164</volume>
            <issue>1</issue>
            <fpage>35</fpage>
            <lpage>42</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1602211</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14695316</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B4">
            <title>
               <p>The reaction of formaldehyde with polynucleotides</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Haselkorn</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Doty</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Biol Chem</source>
            <pubdate>1961</pubdate>
            <volume>236</volume>
            <fpage>2738</fpage>
            <lpage>2745</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">13905167</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B5">
            <title>
               <p>Isolation and identification of cross-links from formaldehyde-treated nucleic acids</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Chaw</snm>
                  <fnm>YF</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Crane</snm>
                  <fnm>LE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lange</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Shapiro</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Biochemistry</source>
            <pubdate>1980</pubdate>
            <volume>19</volume>
            <issue>24</issue>
            <fpage>5525</fpage>
            <lpage>5531</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1021/bi00565a010</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">7459328</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B6">
            <title>
               <p>Conversions of formaldehyde-modified 2'-deoxyadenosine 5'-monophosphate in conditions modeling formalin-fixed tissue dehydration</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rait</snm>
                  <fnm>VK</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zhang</snm>
                  <fnm>Q</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fabris</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mason</snm>
                  <fnm>JT</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>O'Leary</snm>
                  <fnm>TJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Histochem Cytochem</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>54</volume>
            <issue>3</issue>
            <fpage>301</fpage>
            <lpage>310</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1783762</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16116034</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1369/jhc.5A6725.2005</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B7">
            <title>
               <p>Effects of fixation on RNA extraction and amplification from laser capture microdissected tissue</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Goldsworthy</snm>
                  <fnm>SM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Stockton</snm>
                  <fnm>PS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Trempus</snm>
                  <fnm>CS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Foley</snm>
                  <fnm>JF</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Maronpot</snm>
                  <fnm>RR</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Mol Carcinog</source>
            <pubdate>1999</pubdate>
            <volume>25</volume>
            <issue>2</issue>
            <fpage>86</fpage>
            <lpage>91</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1098-2744(199906)25:2&lt;86::AID-MC2>3.0.CO;2-4</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10365909</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B8">
            <title>
               <p>Quantitative real-time PCR: a powerful ally in cancer research</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mocellin</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rossi</snm>
                  <fnm>CR</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pilati</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nitti</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Marincola</snm>
                  <fnm>FM</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Trends Mol Med</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <issue>5</issue>
            <fpage>189</fpage>
            <lpage>195</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S1471-4914(03)00047-9</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12763523</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B9">
            <title>
               <p>TSH receptor status of thyroid neoplasms--TaqMan RT-PCR analysis of archival material</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sheils</snm>
                  <fnm>OM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sweeney</snm>
                  <fnm>EC</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Pathol</source>
            <pubdate>1999</pubdate>
            <volume>188</volume>
            <issue>1</issue>
            <fpage>87</fpage>
            <lpage>92</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199905)188:1&lt;87::AID-PATH322>3.0.CO;2-5</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10398146</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B10">
            <title>
               <p>Assessment of ret/PTC-1 rearrangements in neoplastic thyroid tissue using TaqMan RT-PCR</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sheils</snm>
                  <fnm>OM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>O'Leary</snm>
                  <fnm>JJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sweeney</snm>
                  <fnm>EC</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Pathol</source>
            <pubdate>2000</pubdate>
            <volume>192</volume>
            <issue>1</issue>
            <fpage>32</fpage>
            <lpage>36</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/1096-9896(2000)9999:9999&lt;::AID-PATH668>3.0.CO;2-F</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10951397</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B11">
            <title>
               <p>Effect of duration of fixation on quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analyses</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Macabeo-Ong</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ginzinger</snm>
                  <fnm>DG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dekker</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>McMillan</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Regezi</snm>
                  <fnm>JA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wong</snm>
                  <fnm>DT</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jordan</snm>
                  <fnm>RC</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Mod Pathol</source>
            <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
            <volume>15</volume>
            <issue>9</issue>
            <fpage>979</fpage>
            <lpage>987</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/01.MP.0000026054.62220.FC</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12218216</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B12">
            <title>
               <p>Quantitative mRNA expression analysis from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues using 5' nuclease quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Godfrey</snm>
                  <fnm>TE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kim</snm>
                  <fnm>SH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Chavira</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ruff</snm>
                  <fnm>DW</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Warren</snm>
                  <fnm>RS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gray</snm>
                  <fnm>JW</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jensen</snm>
                  <fnm>RH</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Mol Diagn</source>
            <pubdate>2000</pubdate>
            <volume>2</volume>
            <issue>2</issue>
            <fpage>84</fpage>
            <lpage>91</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1906896</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11272893</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B13">
            <title>
               <p>Optimizing gene expression analysis in archival brain tissue</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Van Deerlin</snm>
                  <fnm>VM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gill</snm>
                  <fnm>LH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nelson</snm>
                  <fnm>PT</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Neurochem Res</source>
            <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
            <volume>27</volume>
            <issue>10</issue>
            <fpage>993</fpage>
            <lpage>1003</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1023/A:1020996519419</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12462400</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B14">
            <title>
               <p>Laser microdissection and gene expression analysis on formaldehyde-fixed archival tissue</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cohen</snm>
                  <fnm>CD</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Grone</snm>
                  <fnm>HJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Grone</snm>
                  <fnm>EF</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nelson</snm>
                  <fnm>PJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Schlondorff</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kretzler</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Kidney Int</source>
            <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
            <volume>61</volume>
            <issue>1</issue>
            <fpage>125</fpage>
            <lpage>132</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00112.x</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11786092</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B15">
            <title>
               <p>Towards quantitative mRNA analysis in paraffin-embedded tissues using real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction: a methodological study on lymph nodes from melanoma patients</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Abrahamsen</snm>
                  <fnm>HN</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Steiniche</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nexo</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hamilton-Dutoit</snm>
                  <fnm>SJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sorensen</snm>
                  <fnm>BS</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Mol Diagn</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>5</volume>
            <issue>1</issue>
            <fpage>34</fpage>
            <lpage>41</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1907376</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12552078</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B16">
            <title>
               <p>Real-time quantitative RT-PCR shows variable, assay-dependent sensitivity to formalin fixation: implications for direct comparison of transcript levels in paraffin-embedded tissues</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Koch</snm>
                  <fnm>I</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Slotta-Huspenina</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hollweck</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Anastasov</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hofler</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Quintanilla-Martinez</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fend</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Diagn Mol Pathol</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>15</volume>
            <issue>3</issue>
            <fpage>149</fpage>
            <lpage>156</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/01.pdm.0000213450.99655.54</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16932070</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B17">
            <title>
               <p>Preliminary comparison of quantity, quality, and microarray performance of RNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, and unfixed frozen tissue samples</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Scicchitano</snm>
                  <fnm>MS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dalmas</snm>
                  <fnm>DA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bertiaux</snm>
                  <fnm>MA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Anderson</snm>
                  <fnm>SM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Turner</snm>
                  <fnm>LR</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Thomas</snm>
                  <fnm>RA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mirable</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Boyce</snm>
                  <fnm>RW</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Histochem Cytochem</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>54</volume>
            <issue>11</issue>
            <fpage>1229</fpage>
            <lpage>1237</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1369/jhc.6A6999.2006</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16864893</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B18">
            <title>
               <p>Analysis of chemical modification of RNA from formalin-fixed samples and optimization of molecular biology applications for such samples</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Masuda</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ohnishi</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kawamoto</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Monden</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Okubo</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>
            <pubdate>1999</pubdate>
            <volume>27</volume>
            <issue>22</issue>
            <fpage>4436</fpage>
            <lpage>4443</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">148727</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10536153</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/nar/27.22.4436</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B19">
            <title>
               <p>Improved RT-PCR amplification for molecular analyses with long-term preserved formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hamatani</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Eguchi</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Takahashi</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Koyama</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mukai</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ito</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Taga</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Yasui</snm>
                  <fnm>W</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nakachi</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Histochem Cytochem</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>54</volume>
            <issue>7</issue>
            <fpage>773</fpage>
            <lpage>780</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1369/jhc.5A6859.2006</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16517976</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B20">
            <title>
               <p>RNA integrity and the effect on the real-time qRT-PCR performance</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fleige</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pfaffl</snm>
                  <fnm>MW</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Mol Aspects Med</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>27</volume>
            <issue>2-3</issue>
            <fpage>126</fpage>
            <lpage>139</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.mam.2005.12.003</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16469371</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B21">
            <title>
               <p>Quantitative gene expression analysis in microdissected archival formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor tissue</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Specht</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Richter</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Muller</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Walch</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Werner</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hofler</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Am J Pathol</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>158</volume>
            <issue>2</issue>
            <fpage>419</fpage>
            <lpage>429</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1850313</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11159180</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B22">
            <title>
               <p>A simple method for RNA isolation from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded lymphatic tissues</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Korbler</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Grskovic</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dominis</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Antica</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Exp Mol Pathol</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>74</volume>
            <issue>3</issue>
            <fpage>336</fpage>
            <lpage>340</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0014-4800(03)00024-8</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12782023</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B23">
            <title>
               <p>Comparison of miRNA expression patterns using total RNA extracted from matched samples of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cells and snap frozen cells</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Li</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Smyth</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Flavin</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cahill</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Denning</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Aherne</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Guenther</snm>
                  <fnm>SM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>O'Leary J</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sheils</snm>
                  <fnm>O</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>BMC Biotechnol</source>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <fpage>36</fpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1914054</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17603869</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1472-6750-7-36</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B24">
            <title>
               <p>Real time quantitative PCR</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Heid</snm>
                  <fnm>CA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Stevens</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Livak</snm>
                  <fnm>KJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Williams</snm>
                  <fnm>PM</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Genome Res</source>
            <pubdate>1996</pubdate>
            <volume>6</volume>
            <issue>10</issue>
            <fpage>986</fpage>
            <lpage>994</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1101/gr.6.10.986</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8908518</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B25">
            <title>
               <p>A novel method for real time quantitative RT-PCR</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gibson</snm>
                  <fnm>UE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Heid</snm>
                  <fnm>CA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Williams</snm>
                  <fnm>PM</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Genome Res</source>
            <pubdate>1996</pubdate>
            <volume>6</volume>
            <issue>10</issue>
            <fpage>995</fpage>
            <lpage>1001</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1101/gr.6.10.995</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8908519</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B26">
            <title>
               <p>A molecular expression signature distinguishing follicular lesions in thyroid carcinoma using preamplification RT-PCR in archival samples</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Denning</snm>
                  <fnm>KM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Smyth</snm>
                  <fnm>PC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cahill</snm>
                  <fnm>SF</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Finn</snm>
                  <fnm>SP</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Conlon</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Li</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Flavin</snm>
                  <fnm>RJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Aherne</snm>
                  <fnm>ST</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Guenther</snm>
                  <fnm>SM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ferlinz</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>O'Leary J</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sheils</snm>
                  <fnm>OM</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Mod Pathol</source>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
            <volume>20</volume>
            <issue>10</issue>
            <fpage>1095</fpage>
            <lpage>1102</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/modpathol.3800943</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17660800</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B27">
            <title>
               <p>Influence of reagents formulation on real-time PCR parameters</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Burgos</snm>
                  <fnm>JS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ramirez</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Tenorio</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sastre</snm>
                  <fnm>I</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bullido</snm>
                  <fnm>MJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Mol Cell Probes</source>
            <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
            <volume>16</volume>
            <issue>4</issue>
            <fpage>257</fpage>
            <lpage>260</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/mcpr.2002.0419</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12270266</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B28">
            <title>
               <p>Real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and its potential use in clinical diagnosis</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bustin</snm>
                  <fnm>SA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mueller</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Clin Sci (Lond)</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>109</volume>
            <issue>4</issue>
            <fpage>365</fpage>
            <lpage>379</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16171460</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B29">
            <title>
               <p>In situ isolation of mRNA from individual plant cells: creation of cell-specific cDNA libraries</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Karrer</snm>
                  <fnm>EE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lincoln</snm>
                  <fnm>JE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hogenhout</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bennett</snm>
                  <fnm>AB</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bostock</snm>
                  <fnm>RM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Martineau</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lucas</snm>
                  <fnm>WJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gilchrist</snm>
                  <fnm>DG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Alexander</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</source>
            <pubdate>1995</pubdate>
            <volume>92</volume>
            <issue>9</issue>
            <fpage>3814</fpage>
            <lpage>3818</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">42052</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">7731989</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.92.9.3814</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B30">
            <title>
               <p>Real-time PCR analysis of DNA and RNA extracted from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded biopsies</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lehmann</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kreipe</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Methods</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>25</volume>
            <issue>4</issue>
            <fpage>409</fpage>
            <lpage>418</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/meth.2001.1263</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11846610</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B31">
            <title>
               <p>Reliable gene expression measurements from degraded RNA by quantitative real-time PCR depend on short amplicons and a proper normalization</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Antonov</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Goldstein</snm>
                  <fnm>DR</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Oberli</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Baltzer</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pirotta</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fleischmann</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Altermatt</snm>
                  <fnm>HJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jaggi</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Lab Invest</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>85</volume>
            <issue>8</issue>
            <fpage>1040</fpage>
            <lpage>1050</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/labinvest.3700303</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15951835</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B32">
            <title>
               <p>Comparison of relative mRNA quantification models and the impact of RNA integrity in quantitative real-time RT-PCR</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fleige</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Walf</snm>
                  <fnm>V</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Huch</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Prgomet</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sehm</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pfaffl</snm>
                  <fnm>MW</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Biotechnol Lett</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>28</volume>
            <issue>19</issue>
            <fpage>1601</fpage>
            <lpage>1613</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s10529-006-9127-2</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16900335</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B33">
            <title>
               <p>Effect of ret/PTC 1 rearrangement on transcription and post-transcriptional regulation in a papillary thyroid carcinoma model</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cahill</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Smyth</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Finn</snm>
                  <fnm>SP</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Denning</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Flavin</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>O'Regan</snm>
                  <fnm>EM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Li</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Potratz</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Guenther</snm>
                  <fnm>SM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Henfrey</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>O'Leary</snm>
                  <fnm>JJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sheils</snm>
                  <fnm>O</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Mol Cancer</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>5</volume>
            <fpage>70</fpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1713250</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17156473</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1476-4598-5-70</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
      </refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>

