<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art><ui>1471-2474-11-108</ui><ji>1471-2474</ji><fm>
<dochead>Research article</dochead>
<bibl>
<title>
<p>Translating the Dutch Walking Stairs, Walking Ability and Rising and Sitting Questionnaires into German and assessing their concurrent validity with VAS measures of pain and activities in daily living</p>
</title>
<aug>
<au id="A1"><snm>Heitz</snm><fnm>Carolin</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>carolin.heitz@balgrist.ch</email></au>
<au id="A2"><snm>Bachmann</snm><mi>M</mi><fnm>Lucas</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>lucas.bachmann@usz.ch</email></au>
<au id="A3"><snm>Leibfried</snm><fnm>Anne</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>anneleibfried@yahoo.com</email></au>
<au id="A4"><snm>Kissling</snm><fnm>Rudolf</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>Rudolf.kissling@balgrist.ch</email></au>
<au id="A5"><snm>Kessels</snm><mi>GH</mi><fnm>Alfons</fnm><insr iid="I4"/><email>fons.kessels@mumc.nl</email></au>
<au id="A6"><snm>Perez</snm><mi>SGM</mi><fnm>Roberto</fnm><insr iid="I5"/><insr iid="I6"/><insr iid="I7"/><email>rsgm.perez@vumc.nl</email></au>
<au id="A7"><snm>Marinus</snm><fnm>Johan</fnm><insr iid="I6"/><insr iid="I8"/><email>J.Marinus@lumc.nl</email></au>
<au ca="yes" id="A8"><snm>Brunner</snm><fnm>Florian</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><insr iid="I9"/><email>florian.brunner@balgrist.ch</email></au>
</aug>
<insg>
<ins id="I1"><p>Department Physiotherapy, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland</p></ins>
<ins id="I2"><p>Horten Centre for patient oriented research, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</p></ins>
<ins id="I3"><p>Department of Physical Medicine and Rheumatology, Balgrist University Hospital, Switzerland</p></ins>
<ins id="I4"><p>Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands</p></ins>
<ins id="I5"><p>Department of Anaesthesiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands</p></ins>
<ins id="I6"><p>TREND (Trauma Related Neuronal Dysfunction) consortium http://www.trendconsortium.nl/home-en</p></ins>
<ins id="I7"><p>EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research (EMGO), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands</p></ins>
<ins id="I8"><p>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands</p></ins>
<ins id="I9"><p>Department of General Practice, AMC University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands</p></ins>
</insg>
<source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</source>
<issn>1471-2474</issn>
<pubdate>2010</pubdate>
<volume>11</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>108</fpage>
<url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/11/108</url>
<xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2474-11-108</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">20515456</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
</bibl>
<history><rec><date><day>30</day><month>7</month><year>2009</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>1</day><month>6</month><year>2010</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>1</day><month>6</month><year>2010</year></date></pub></history>
<cpyrt><year>2010</year><collab>Heitz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
<abs>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Abstract</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Background</p>
</st>
<p>The Dutch Walking Stairs, Walking Ability and Rising and Sitting Questionnaires are three validated instruments to measure physical activity and limitations in daily living in patients with lower extremity disorders living at home of which no German equivalents are available. Our scope was to translate the Walking Stairs, Walking Ability and Rising and Sitting Questionnaires into German and to verify its concurrent validity in the two domains pain and activities in daily living by comparing them with the corresponding measures on the Visual Analogue Scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Methods</p>
</st>
<p>We translated the Walking Stairs, Walking Ability and Rising and Sitting Questionnaires according to published guidelines. Demographic data and validity were assessed in 52 consecutive patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome 1 of the lower extremity. Information on age, duration of symptoms, type of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome 1 and type of initiating event were obtained. We assessed the concurrent validity in the two domains pain and activities in daily living by comparing them with the corresponding measures on the Visual Analogue Scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results</p>
</st>
<p>We found that variability in the German Walking Stairs, Walking Ability and Rising and Sitting Questionnaires was largely explained by measures of pain and activities in daily living on the Visual Analogue Scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusion</p>
</st>
<p>Our study shows that the domains pain and activities in daily living are properly represented in the German versions of the Walking Stairs, Walking Ability and Raising and Sitting Questionnaires. We would like to propagate their use in clinical practice and research alike.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</abs>
</fm><meta>
<classifications>
<classification id="endnote" subtype="user_supplied_xml" type="bmc"/>
</classifications>
</meta><bdy>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Background</p>
</st>
<p>Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a painful condition that often results in substantial disability <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Two types of CRPS can be distinguished: type 1, formerly known as reflex sympathetic dystrophy or algodystrophy, which occurs without a definable nerve lesion and type 2, formerly called causalgia, in which a definable nerve lesion is present <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>In the past the focus of CRPS research was mainly on symptoms and pain. Little attention has been given to the disabilities associated with CRPS. As a consequence, little information is available on the problems CRPS patients encounter in activities in daily living, and specific measurement instruments to address these problems are lacking <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>We are only aware of one instrument, which allows measuring the functional limitation of CRPS patients. In 2000, Oerlemans et al. developed and validated the Radboud Skills Questionniare (RASQ) to map alterations in the level of disability in patients with CRPS of the upper extremity <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Today the RASQ is available in Dutch <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, English (not validated yet) and German language. Various instruments are available to measure activity limitations of the lower extremity <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, but we are not aware of a corresponding questionnaire for patients with CRPS 1 of the lower extremity. Most of these existing instruments do not provide a detailed measurement of activity limitation of the lower extremity perceived by the patients. Between 1996 and 2005 a Dutch group of researchers developed and validated three separate tools in Dutch assessing walking ability, including walking stairs, as well as rising and sitting <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. These instruments were applied in various lower extremity disorders such as osteoarthritis, amputation, diabetic foot problems and CRPS 1. These instruments serve as disability measures in a large Dutch CRPS research consortium <url>http://www.trendconsortium.nl</url>. Up to now, these instruments are only available in Dutch and English (not validated). In this paper we describe how we translated the Walking Stairs, Walking Ability and Rising and Sitting Questionnaires into German and how we verified its concurrent validity in the two domains pain and activities in daily living by comparing them with the corresponding measures on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Methods</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Recruitment sources and data acquisition</p>
</st>
<p>We recruited patients from the outpatient clinic of Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland and through advertisements posted on two self-help homepages for patients afflicted with CRPS (<url>http://www.morbus-sudeck.ch</url>, <url>http://sudeck.foren-city.de</url>). We included all eligible and consenting adult patients suffering from CRPS 1 of the lower extremity with fulfilled International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) criteria, more than 18 years of age, illness duration of more than three months and the ability to complete the questionnaires. The study protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee (Spezialisierte Unterkomission f&#252;r Orthop&#228;die der Kantonalen Ethikkommission, Zurich, Switzerland) and informed consent was obtained from all participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Assessment instrument</p>
</st>
<p>The Walking Stairs <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, Walking Ability <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and Rising and Sitting Questionnaires <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
</abbrgrp> aim at determining perceived activity limitations in patients with lower extremity disorders. They are self administered questionnaires including a total of 79 dichotomous items. The scores of the specific three subdomains can be calculated as well as the total score of all three questionnaires.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Translation process</p>
</st>
<p>We followed a sequential forward and backward translation approach (see figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>) <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Two professional translators translated the original Dutch version of the Walking Stairs, Walking Ability and Rising and Sitting Questionnaires into German. In a consensus meeting a rheumatologist, a specialist in physical medicine and rehabilitation, a physical therapist and an epidemiologist assessed the consistency of the translation and judged its face validity. They then agreed on the first German version for these formats. The questionnaires were pilot tested in five CRPS 1 patients to identify difficulties in comprehension and interpretation of the questions. In addition, we tested various possible wordings of items, answer choices and instructions if the translation team considered more than one possible version. A Dutch translator with experience in biomedical sciences but unaware of the original versions performed a backward translation of the German version into the source language (Dutch). A team of experts (a rehabilitation specialist, a rheumatologist, an epidemiologist and a physical therapist) compared the back translation with the Dutch versions to check for conceptual discrepancies. After a second pilot test (n = 5 CRPS 1 patients), the translation team discussed the comments from these patients and decided in consensus on modifications. Finally, the experts approved the final German version of all three questionnaires.</p>
<fig id="F1"><title><p>Figure 1</p></title><caption><p>Flow diagram of the development process of the German Walking Stairs, Walking Ability and Rising &amp; Sitting Questionnaires</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Flow diagram of the development process of the German Walking Stairs, Walking Ability and Rising &amp; Sitting Questionnaires</b>.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2474-11-108-1"/></fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Validation process</p>
</st>
<p>All three questionnaires were offered to CRPS 1 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Patients received the questionnaires either during a visit in our outpatient clinic or by mail. Participants were asked to complete the questionnaires during the same day and to mail them back to our institution. In order to assess the concurrent validity of the questionnaires, we assessed pain and self perceived restriction in activities in daily (ADL) living on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0 = no pain/restriction, 10 = worst pain/maximal restriction). We hypothesized, that a higher score on the VAS (pain and ADL) is associated with a more severe functional impairment in CRPS 1 patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Statistical analysis</p>
</st>
<p>Values are reported as mean &#177; SD, medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) or as absolute number and percentage. Linear regression analysis and mean prediction interval were used to assess the relationship between the three questionnaires and the VAS pain respectively VAS of activities in daily living. A probability value of p &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all tests. We performed all statistical analyses with the SPSS 12 statistical software package (SPSS Inc. Headquarters, 233 S. Wacker Drive, 11th floor Chicago, Illinois 60606).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Translation and instrument development</p>
</st>
<p>The wording of the questions and response options correspond to the original version. We did not add or remove items nor changed response categories.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Demographic and clinical characteristics</p>
</st>
<p>The demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants are shown in table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>. We enrolled 52 patients suffering from CRPS 1 of the lower extremity (females/males: 46/6). Forty patients (76.9%) suffered from CRPS 1 of the foot and 11 (21.2%) from the knee. Trauma (48.1%) and surgery (46.2%) were the most common initiating events. Median disease duration was 2.2 years (IQR 0.79 to 5.19).</p>
<tbl id="T1"><title><p>Table 1</p></title><caption><p>Demographic and clinical characteristics of study population (N = 52)</p></caption><tblbdy cols="2">
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Characteristic</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Value</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="2">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Gender</p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c indent="1" ca="left">
            <p>Male</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>6 (11.5%)</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c indent="1" ca="left">
            <p>Female</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>46 (88.5%)</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Mean age (+standard deviation)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>50.3 + 14.5 years</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Age range</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>18.2-76.7 years</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Affected body part</p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c indent="1" ca="left">
            <p>Foot</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>40 (76.9%)</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c indent="1" ca="left">
            <p>Knee</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>11 (21.2%)</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c indent="1" ca="left">
            <p>Other</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>1 (1.9%)</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Median (IQR)* of number of years with CRPS 1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>2.2 years (0.79-5.19)</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Initiating event</p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c indent="1" ca="left">
            <p>Trauma</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>25 (48.1%)</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c indent="1" ca="left">
            <p>Surgery</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>24 (46.2%)</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c indent="1" ca="left">
            <p>Other</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>3 (5.8%)</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>* IQR: Interquartile range</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Descriptive statistic of pain and activity limitation on Visual Analogue Scale and the Walking Stairs, Walking Ability and Rising and Sitting Questionnaires</p>
</st>
<p>Self perceived pain and restrictions in activities in daily living were 5.7 + 2.1 and 5.6 + 2.2 on the VAS. Average of the total score of the questionnaires was 29.4 + 13.2 (walking stairs 5.6 + 2.5, walking ability 11.9 + 5.6, rising and sitting 11.9 + 6.5). For the detailed analysis see table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>.</p>
<tbl id="T2"><title><p>Table 2</p></title><caption><p>Descriptive statistics of pain and activity limitation on Visual Analogue Scale, and the Walking Stairs, Walking Ability and Rising and Sitting Questionnaires (N = 52)</p></caption><tblbdy cols="2">
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <b>Score (+SD)</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="2">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Pain (VAS)*</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>5.7 + 2.1</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Restrictions in activities in daily living (VAS) *</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>5.6 + 2.2</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Total score questionnaires</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>29.4 + 13.2</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c indent="1" ca="left">
            <p>Walking stairs</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>5.6 + 2.5</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c indent="1" ca="left">
            <p>Walking ability</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>11.9 + 5.6</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c indent="1" ca="left">
            <p>Rising and sitting</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>11.9 + 6.5</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>* VAS: Visual Analogue Scale (0 = no pain, no restriction, 10 = worst pain, maximal restriction)</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Concurrent validity for pain</p>
</st>
<p>VAS pain scores explained a considerable amount of variability of the total score (R<sup>2 </sup>= 0.25). Higher VAS pain scores indicated higher total functional limitation (coefficient or slope = 3.33 (95% CI 1.82 to 4.84;p &lt; 0.001)). These results were consistent within the subdomains walking stairs (slope = 0.59 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.88; p &lt; 0.001)), walking ability (slope = 1.49 (95% 0.85 to 2.21; p &lt; 0.001)), and raising and sitting (slope = 1.25 (95% CI 0.45 to 2.06; p = 0.003)). For details see table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr> and figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>.</p>
<tbl id="T3"><title><p>Table 3</p></title><caption><p>Concurrent validity compared with pain (Visual Analogue Scale) (N = 52)</p></caption><tblbdy cols="5">
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Domain</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Slope *</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>95%CI</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>p-Value</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>R</b>
               <sup>
                  <b>2</b>
               </sup>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="5">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Walking stairs</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.59</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.30-0.88</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&lt;0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.25</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Walking ability</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.49</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.85-2.12</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&lt;0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.31</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Rising and sitting</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.25</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.45-2.06</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.17</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Total score</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.33</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.82-4.84</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&lt;0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.25</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>* indicating strength of association between Visual Analogue Scale scores and questionnaire domains (from regression analysis)</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<fig id="F2"><title><p>Figure 2</p></title><caption><p>Linear regression lines with 95% prediction intervals for means (pain)</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Linear regression lines with 95% prediction intervals for means (pain)</b>.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2474-11-108-2"/></fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Concurrent validity for activities in daily living</p>
</st>
<p>VAS ADL scores explained a substantial amount of variability of the total score (R<sup>2 </sup>= 0.37). Higher VAS ADL scores indicated higher total functional limitation (slope = 8.77 (95% CI 2.32 to 5.04; p &lt; 0.001)). These results were consistent across the subdomains walking stairs (slope = 1.43 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.99; p &lt; 0.001)), walking ability (slope = 2.61 (95% CI 1.10 to 2.23; p = &lt; 0.001)) and raising and sitting (slope = 4.47 (95% CI 0.50 to 2.03; p &lt; 0.02)).</p>
<p>For details see table <tblr tid="T4">4</tblr> and figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>.</p>
<tbl id="T4"><title><p>Table 4</p></title><caption><p>Concurrent validity compared with ADL (Visual Analogue Scale) (N = 52)</p></caption><tblbdy cols="5">
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Domain</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Slope *</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>95%CI</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>p-Value</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>R</b>
               <sup>
                  <b>2</b>
               </sup>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="5">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Walking stairs</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.43</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>0.51-0.99</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>&lt;0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>0.43</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Walking ability</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.61</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>1.10-2.23</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>&lt;0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>0.45</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Rising and sitting</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4.74</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>0.50-2.03</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>0.002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>0.13</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Total score</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>8.77</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.32-5.04</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&lt;0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>0.37</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>* indicating strength of association between VAS scores and questionnaire domains (From regression analysis)</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<fig id="F3"><title><p>Figure 3</p></title><caption><p>Linear regression lines with 95% prediction intervals for means (ADL)</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Linear regression lines with 95% prediction intervals for means (ADL)</b>.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2474-11-108-3"/></fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Discussion</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Main findings</p>
</st>
<p>We successfully translated the Walking Stairs, Walking Ability and Rising &amp; Sitting Questionnaires into German. Assessing its concurrent validity we found that the German instrument adequately represents activity limitations in daily living and pain in patients with CRPS 1 of the lower extremity. Score values were positively correlated with VAS values for pain and activities in daily living. The correlation of the total score of the three questionnaires was better with VAS ADL than VAS pain. We hypothesize that this difference can be explained by the fact, that pain is a different construct than activity <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>The translation process itself had no issues of concern, all forward and backward translations were consistent with each other and with the original version. We followed the rigorous translation method proposed by Wild et al. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, which consisted of a forward and backward translation by professional translators, and by a consensus meeting between researchers. By applying this robust methodology we ensured that the content, integrity and essence of the questionnaires items are maintained and expressed clearly and accurately from one language to another.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Strength and limitations</p>
</st>
<p>To our knowledge, this is the first German translation and external validation of the original Dutch version of the Walking Stairs, Walking Ability and Rising &amp; Sitting Questionnaires allowing the standardized measurement of activity limitations of patients suffering from CRPS 1 of the lower extremity. Another strength is the methods we applied to derive the translated version of the three questionnaires. Our study also has some limitations. First, since diagnosis of CRPS 1 is still a matter of debate our sample might not be representative for a larger CRPS 1 population. The diagnosis of CRPS 1 is based on clinical findings (including sensory, autonomic, motor and trophic changes) and the fulfilment of established diagnostic criteria <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. We only included patients fulfilling the criteria established by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
</abbrgrp> in all participants. However, these IASP criteria have been criticized because they are symptom based and show a low specificity <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Second, unlike the upper extremities, an instrument for lower extremities was not available to assess the criterion validity of the three questionnaires. Therefore, we had to validate them by assessing the concurrent validity in respect of self reported activity limitations in daily living and pain. However, the correlation between pain and activity level is known to be low in chronic musculoskeletal disability (e.g. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
</abbrgrp>). In addition, we are not aware that the reliabil-ity and validity for measuring activity limitations with the VAS have been studied. These considerations also limit the quality of this study. Third, a further limitation might be the fact that we did not look at content validity by coding to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), expert content or other CRPS 1 constructs.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Implications for practice</p>
</st>
<p>This validated German version will help to determine the disability of patients suffering from CRPS 1 of the lower extremity in German speaking countries in clinical practice as well as in research. This is important, if these questionnaires will be used to document follow up in longitudinal studies or intervention studies <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In addition, it allows a comparison of the results of studies from different origins. In particular, the German versions of the German Walking Stairs, Walking Ability and Rising and Sitting Questionnaires allow us now to collect data for the Swiss CRPS 1 cohort study <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and to compare the results with our Dutch collaborators within the TREND consortium (Trauma RElated Neuronal Dysfunction, <url>http://www.trendconsortium.nl</url>).</p>
<p>Investigators in German-speaking countries now have the possibility to assess physical activity and limitations in daily living in patients with CRPS 1 of the lower extremity.</p>
<p>Information about patients' disability can be used to enhance clinical decision making and to observe the course of the condition.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusions</p>
</st>
<p>Our study demonstrates a sufficient concurrent validity for the German versions of the Walking Stairs, Walking Ability and Rising and Sitting Questionnaires for the use in clinical practice as well as research. We would like to propagate their use in clinical practice and research alike.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Competing interests</p>
</st>
<p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Authors' contributions</p>
</st>
<p>All authors participated in the study design. FB and LMB drafted the protocol and the manuscript. CH and AL assisted in patient recruiting. RK and FB obtained funding. CH, AGHK, RSGMP and JM critically reviewed the protocol and the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
</bdy><bm>
<ack>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Acknowledgements</p>
</st>
<p>We are indebted to the Wolfermann-N&#228;geli Foundation and the Paul Schiller Foundation in Zurich, Switzerland for the generous financial support. Dr Bachmann's work (grants no. 3233B0-103182 and 3200B0-103183) was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation. The author's would like to thank the TREND consortium for the collaboration</p>
</sec>
</ack>
<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>Complex regional pain syndrome: are there distinct subtypes and sequential stages of the syndrome?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bruehl</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Harden</snm><fnm>RN</fnm></au><au><snm>Galer</snm><fnm>BS</fnm></au><au><snm>Saltz</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Backonja</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Stanton-Hicks</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Pain</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>95</volume><issue>1-2</issue><fpage>119</fpage><lpage>124</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00387-6</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11790474</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>Reflex sympathetic dystrophy: changing concepts and taxonomy</p></title><aug><au><snm>Stanton-Hicks</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Janig</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Hassenbusch</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Haddox</snm><fnm>JD</fnm></au><au><snm>Boas</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Wilson</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Pain</source><pubdate>1995</pubdate><volume>63</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>127</fpage><lpage>133</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0304-3959(95)00110-E</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8577483</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Measuring perceived activity limitations in lower extremity Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type 1 (CRPS I): test-retest reliability of two questionnaires</p></title><aug><au><snm>Perez</snm><fnm>RS</fnm></au><au><snm>Roorda</snm><fnm>LD</fnm></au><au><snm>Zuurmond</snm><fnm>WW</fnm></au><au><snm>Bannink</snm><fnm>II</fnm></au><au><snm>Vranken</snm><fnm>JH</fnm></au><au><snm>de Lange</snm><fnm>JJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Clin Rehabil</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>454</fpage><lpage>460</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1191/0269215502cr517oa</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12061480</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>The Radboud skills questionnaire: construction and reliability in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy of one upper extremity</p></title><aug><au><snm>Oerlemans</snm><fnm>HM</fnm></au><au><snm>Cup</snm><fnm>EH</fnm></au><au><snm>DeBoo</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Goris</snm><fnm>RJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Oostendorp</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au></aug><source>Disabil Rehabil</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>233</fpage><lpage>245</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/096382800296809</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">10813562</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Functional Evaluation: The Barthel Index</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mahoney</snm><fnm>FI</fnm></au><au><snm>Barthel</snm><fnm>DW</fnm></au></aug><source>Md State Med J</source><pubdate>1965</pubdate><volume>14</volume><fpage>61</fpage><lpage>65</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">14258950</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Keith</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au><au><snm>Granger</snm><fnm>CV</fnm></au><au><snm>Hamilton</snm><fnm>BB</fnm></au><au><snm>Sherwin</snm><fnm>FS</fnm></au></aug><source>Adv Clin Rehabil</source><pubdate>1987</pubdate><volume>1</volume><fpage>6</fpage><lpage>18</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">3503663</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ware</snm><fnm>JE</fnm><suf>Jr</suf></au><au><snm>Sherbourne</snm><fnm>CD</fnm></au></aug><source>Med Care</source><pubdate>1992</pubdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>473</fpage><lpage>483</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">1593914</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales</p></title><aug><au><snm>Fries</snm><fnm>JF</fnm></au><au><snm>Spitz</snm><fnm>PW</fnm></au><au><snm>Young</snm><fnm>DY</fnm></au></aug><source>J Rheumatol</source><pubdate>1982</pubdate><volume>9</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>789</fpage><lpage>793</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">7175852</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bellamy</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Buchanan</snm><fnm>WW</fnm></au><au><snm>Goldsmith</snm><fnm>CH</fnm></au><au><snm>Campbell</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Stitt</snm><fnm>LW</fnm></au></aug><source>J Rheumatol</source><pubdate>1988</pubdate><volume>15</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1833</fpage><lpage>1840</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">3068365</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>AIMS2. The content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Health Status Questionnaire</p></title><aug><au><snm>Meenan</snm><fnm>RF</fnm></au><au><snm>Mason</snm><fnm>JH</fnm></au><au><snm>Anderson</snm><fnm>JJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Guccione</snm><fnm>AA</fnm></au><au><snm>Kazis</snm><fnm>LE</fnm></au></aug><source>Arthritis Rheum</source><pubdate>1992</pubdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>10</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/art.1780350102</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">1731806</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>Improvement of a questionnaire measuring activity limitations in rising and sitting down in patients with lower-extremity disorders living at home</p></title><aug><au><snm>Roorda</snm><fnm>LD</fnm></au><au><snm>Molenaar</snm><fnm>IW</fnm></au><au><snm>Lankhorst</snm><fnm>GJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Bouter</snm><fnm>LM</fnm></au></aug><source>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>86</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>2204</fpage><lpage>2210</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.apmr.2005.06.005</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16271572</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>The walking ability questionnaire: hierarchical scales to measure disabilities in rising and walking</p></title><aug><au><snm>Roorda</snm><fnm>LD</fnm></au><au><snm>Roebroeck</snm><fnm>ME</fnm></au><au><snm>Lankhorst</snm><fnm>GJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Tilburg</snm><fnm>Tv</fnm></au></aug><source>Revalidata</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>18</volume><fpage>34</fpage><lpage>38</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>Measuring activity limitations in walking: development of a hierarchical scale for patients with lower-extremity disorders who live at home</p></title><aug><au><snm>Roorda</snm><fnm>LD</fnm></au><au><snm>Roebroeck</snm><fnm>ME</fnm></au><au><snm>van Tilburg</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Molenaar</snm><fnm>IW</fnm></au><au><snm>Lankhorst</snm><fnm>GJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Bouter</snm><fnm>LM</fnm></au><au><snm>Boonstra</snm><fnm>AM</fnm></au><au><snm>de Laat</snm><fnm>FA</fnm></au><au><snm>Caron</snm><fnm>JJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Burger</snm><fnm>BJ</fnm></au><etal/></aug><source>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>86</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>2277</fpage><lpage>2283</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.apmr.2005.06.014</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16344023</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Measuring activity limitations in climbing stairs: development of a hierarchical scale for patients with lower-extremity disorders living at home</p></title><aug><au><snm>Roorda</snm><fnm>LD</fnm></au><au><snm>Roebroeck</snm><fnm>ME</fnm></au><au><snm>van Tilburg</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Lankhorst</snm><fnm>GJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Bouter</snm><fnm>LM</fnm></au></aug><source>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>85</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>967</fpage><lpage>971</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.apmr.2003.11.018</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15179652</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wild</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Grove</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Martin</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Eremenco</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>McElroy</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Verjee-Lorenz</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Erikson</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Value Health</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>94</fpage><lpage>104</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15804318</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>ICIDH: International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps</p></title><aug><au><cnm>WHO</cnm></au></aug><source>Geneva</source><pubdate>1980</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B17"><title><p>Diagnostic criteria: The statistical derivation of the four criterion factors</p></title><aug><au><snm>Harden</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Bruehl</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>CRPS: Current Diagnosis and Therapy</source><publisher>Seattle, WA: IASP Press</publisher><editor>Wilson P, Stanton-Hicks M, RN Harden R</editor><pubdate>2005</pubdate><fpage>45</fpage><lpage>58</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>Classification of chronic pain: description of chronic pain syndrome and definitions of pain terms</p></title><aug><au><snm>Merskey</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Bogduk</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au></aug><publisher>Seattle: IASP Press</publisher><edition>2</edition><pubdate>1994</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>External validation of IASP diagnostic criteria for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome and proposed research diagnostic criteria. International Association for the Study of Pain</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bruehl</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Harden</snm><fnm>RN</fnm></au><au><snm>Galer</snm><fnm>BS</fnm></au><au><snm>Saltz</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Bertram</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Backonja</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Gayles</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Rudin</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Bhugra</snm><fnm>MK</fnm></au><au><snm>Stanton-Hicks</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Pain</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>81</volume><issue>1-2</issue><fpage>147</fpage><lpage>154</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00011-1</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">10353502</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B20"><title><p>The association between pain and disability</p></title><aug><au><snm>Turner</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au><au><snm>Franklin</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Heagerty</snm><fnm>PJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Wu</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Egan</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Fulton-Kehoe</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Gluck</snm><fnm>JV</fnm></au><au><snm>Wickizer</snm><fnm>TM</fnm></au></aug><source>Pain</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>112</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>307</fpage><lpage>314</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.010</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15561386</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p>Complex regional pain syndrome 1--the Swiss cohort study</p></title><aug><au><snm>Brunner</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Bachmann</snm><fnm>LM</fnm></au><au><snm>Weber</snm><fnm>U</fnm></au><au><snm>Kessels</snm><fnm>AG</fnm></au><au><snm>Perez</snm><fnm>RS</fnm></au><au><snm>Marinus</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Kissling</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>BMC Musculoskelet Disord</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>9</volume><fpage>92</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2474-9-92</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2443796</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">18573212</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl></refgrp>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Pre-publication history</p>
</st>
<p>The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:</p>
<p>
<url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/11/108/prepub</url>
</p>
</sec>
</bm></art>
