<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art><ui>1471-2458-11-143</ui><ji>1471-2458</ji><fm>
<dochead>Research article</dochead>
<bibl>
<title>
<p>Impact of children's migration on health and health care-seeking behavior of elderly left behind</p>
</title>
<aug>
<au ca="yes" id="A1"><snm>Adhikari</snm><fnm>Ramesh</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><insr iid="I2"/><email>rameshipsr@gmail.com</email></au>
<au id="A2"><snm>Jampaklay</snm><fnm>Aree</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>praun@mahidol.ac.th</email></au>
<au id="A3"><snm>Chamratrithirong</snm><fnm>Aphichat</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>pracr@mahidol.ac.th</email></au>
</aug>
<insg>
<ins id="I1"><p>Geography and Population Department, Mahendra Ratna Campus, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal</p></ins>
<ins id="I2"><p>Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University, Salaya, Phutthamonthon, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand</p></ins>
</insg>
<source>BMC Public Health</source>
<issn>1471-2458</issn>
<pubdate>2011</pubdate>
<volume>11</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>143</fpage>
<url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/143</url>
<xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmpid">21366920</pubid><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2458-11-143</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
</bibl>
<history><rec><date><day>28</day><month>7</month><year>2010</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>2</day><month>3</month><year>2011</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>2</day><month>3</month><year>2011</year></date></pub></history>
<cpyrt><year>2011</year><collab>Adhikari et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
<abs>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Abstract</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Background</p>
</st>
<p>Many countries are facing the burden of accelerated population aging and a lack of institutional support to meet the needs of older individuals. In developing countries, adult children are primarily responsible for the care of their elderly parents. However, out-migration of adult children is common in these countries. This study aims to explore the impact of migration on the health of the elderly left behind and their health care-seeking behavior.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Methods</p>
</st>
<p>This paper uses data from a national survey of older persons in Thailand conducted in 2007. The analysis is confined to those who were aged 60 years or above and who had at least one child (biological or step/adopted) (n = 28,677). Logistic regression was used to assess the net effect of migration of adult children on the health of the elderly left behind and their health care-seeking behavior, after controlling for other socio-demographic and economic variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results</p>
</st>
<p>More than two-thirds of the elderly (67%) had at least one migrant child. About three-fifths (58%) reported that they had at least one symptom of poor mental health. Almost three in five elderly (56%) rated their health as poor, and 44% had experienced at least one chronic disease. About two-thirds of the elderly (65%) got sick during the 5 years preceding the survey. An overwhelming majority of elderly (88%) who got sick during the five years preceding the survey had sought treatment for their last illness.</p>
<p>After controlling for socio-demographic and economic variables, our study found that those elderly who had a migrant child were more likely (OR = 1.10; 95% CI 1.05-1.17) to have symptoms of poor mental health than those whose children had not migrated. However, no significant association was observed among physical health, such as experience of chronic disease, perceived poor health, and illness of the elderly left behind. Interestingly, however, out-migration of adult children was independently associated with higher utilization of health services. The elderly who had migrant children were more likely (odds ratio = 1.22, CI 1.11-1.33) than those whose children had not migrated to seek treatment for their most recent illness, after controlling for socio-demographic and economic variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusion</p>
</st>
<p>Our study provides novel evidence on an issue of special importance to countries affected by heavy out-migration of adult children, an issue that has received little attention. Out-migration of adult children was highly associated with poor mental health but it was not associated with the physical health of the elderly left behind. Out-migration of children was also highly associated with higher utilization of health facilities by the elderly. Thus, in order to decrease morbidity among the elderly as well as to maintain and enhance the well-being of families, programs should focus on alleviating the symptoms of poor mental health among the elderly left behind and aim to reduce the differences in utilization of health care-seeking behavior among elderly with children present in the community and elderly left behind.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</abs>
</fm><bdy>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Background</p>
</st>
<p>In modern times, many factors have intensified migration. Improvement in transportation infrastructure, advances in communications technology (which makes keeping in contact with left-behind over much easier and cheaper), increased trade between countries (including the impact of trade resulting from globalization), political instability, poverty, and unemployment in economically disadvantaged areas/countries are some of the important factors that contribute to this phenomenon <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>The interaction between health and migration is complex and dynamic. Migration can have an impact on physical, mental, and emotional health and well-being of migrants themselves, on those left behind in the place of origin, and on those at the destination <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The connection between health status and migration is clearly bidirectional. In one direction, the act of migration may influence health outcomes. In the other direction, a person's health may influence one's propensity to migrate or the destination one chooses <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>In many places, and especially in most developing countries, the growing proportion of aging individuals challenges public and social institutions responsible for elderly care. These countries face an additional burden of accelerated population aging and a lack of institutional support to meet the needs of older individuals <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Changes in demographic events, especially sharp declines in fertility and mortality, have resulted in rising life expectancies and increasing rates of population aging <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. As is the case in most other countries in Asia, the elderly in Thailand have traditionally relied on their children for personal care and financial support <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Trends in declining fertility and increasing internal migration have prevailed in Thailand since 1985, when a period of sustained economic development began <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. These patterns have resulted in decreasing numbers of children available to care for their elderly parents. Increasing out-migration of young adults has created concerns about whether the absence of children in the household or community affects the health of elderly left behind or their health care-seeking behavior. Existing literature on the consequences of migration has focused mainly on the impact of migration on receiving areas and on migrants themselves but has paid little attention to the effects of migration on sending communities and of the family members "left behind" by migrants <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Evidence from the literature shows that migration can affect the health of those left behind both positively and negatively. With additional money coming from remittances, people have easier access to health services, can buy expensive medicine, and eat better quality food <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Thus, migration can benefit both migrants and left-behind family members as it would enhance their well-being <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Remittances received from migration could support the family left behind by minimizing economic risk and overcoming capital constraints <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. A study in South Africa found that temporary internal migrants, by increasing their household income, were able to bring positive health outcomes not only for themselves but also for family members <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
</abbrgrp> including elderly parents left behind <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Other research also shows that migration can lead to better health among the population left behind <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Similarly, a study conducted by Abas et al. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
</abbrgrp> found that out-migration of children was independently associated with less depression in parents.</p>
<p>On the other hand, some research notes that out-migration of young adults has severe negative consequences for ageing parents, namely, loneliness, isolation, and the loss of basic instrumental and economic support <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. A study of Mexico-US migration found evidence of a causal link between poor elderly health outcomes and children's migration to the US <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Research in Bangladesh has found that those left behind by adult migrant children face risks stemming from the loss of personal support and care <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Although the separation of families due to migration might have serious implications on the health status of elderly left behind and their health care-seeking behavior, the possible health effects on elderly left behind in Thailand remain unclear. This study aims to explore the impact of migration of adult children on the health of the elderly left behind and on their health care-seeking behavior. In-depth examination of these issues will provide policy makers and program planners with needed information and will raise public attention to this public health issue. The findings of this study will help fill the gap in the literature and provide the understanding necessary for advocacy and for the design of appropriate interventions related to migration in Thailand.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Methods</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Sources of data and study design</p>
</st>
<p>This paper uses data from a cross-sectional survey conducted in 2007 among the elderly in Thailand. This nationally representative survey was conducted by the National Statistical Office (NSO) of Thailand. The NSO has conducted three nationally representative household surveys of older persons, in 1994, 2002, and 2007 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
</abbrgrp> to fulfill the need for adequate information to develop appropriate policies and programs to ensure the well-being of the Thai elderly. These surveys collected information on socioeconomic conditions, living arrangements, income, health status, and health care-seeking behavior of the elderly in Thai society</p>
<p>The survey is based on a probability sample of persons aged 50 years old or older who were usual residents of their own or family members' households. A stratified two-stage sampling procedure was employed to collect the information. The primary sampling units were blocks for municipal areas and villages for non-municipal areas. The secondary sampling units were households, using random sampling from the list of all enumerated households in each block or village selected. The number of households selected was 15 households per block in municipal areas and 12 households in non-municipal areas. In total, 56,002 persons were interviewed. However, the analysis for this paper is confined to those who were aged 60 years or above and who had at least one child (biological or step/adopted) (n = 28,677). A structured questionnaire was used by trained interviewers to interview selected subjects at the household level. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the NSO of Thailand.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Dependent and independent variables</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Dependent variables</p>
</st>
<p>This study examines several aspects of the health of elderly parents. These include symptoms of poor mental health, self-assessed health status, chronic diseases, illnesses, and treatment-seeking behavior.</p>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Symptoms of poor mental health</p>
</st>
<p>Items measuring symptoms of poor mental health experienced by elderly persons during the month preceding the survey were: i) feeling stress, ii) feeling moody, iii) feeling hopeless, iv) feeling useless, v) feeling down/unhappy, and vi) feeling lonely. One composite indicator, "symptoms of poor mental health," was developed from all the above-listed symptoms (Cronbach's &#945; = 0.86), resulting in 4 categories: had no symptoms of poor mental health, had 1 symptom, had 2 symptoms, and had 3 or more symptoms. For the logistic regression, two further categories were created: "no symptoms poor mental health" and "at least one symptom of poor mental health".</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Self-assessed health</p>
</st>
<p>Respondents in the survey were asked, "How has your health been in the past 7 days?" The question had five response categories (very good, good, fair, bad, and very bad). The authors categorized the response categories into two groups: "good," which included "very good" and "good," and "poor," which included "fair," "bad," and "very bad."</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Chronic diseases</p>
</st>
<p>Individuals were asked about the presence of hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, cancer, stroke, and paralysis. One composite indicator, "chronic disease condition," was developed from all the chronic diseases, resulting in 4 categories: had no chronic disease, had 1 chronic disease, had 2 chronic diseases, and had 3 or more chronic diseases. For the logistic regression, two more categories were created: "no chronic disease" and "at least one chronic disease."</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Illness</p>
</st>
<p>The study explored whether the elderly had symptoms of an illness (self-reported) during the five years preceding the survey. This variable was split into two categories: "experienced symptoms" and "did not experience symptoms."</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Treatment sought</p>
</st>
<p>The study explored whether the elderly who experienced symptoms of an illness during the five years preceding the survey sought treatment for the most recent illness. This variable was categorized into two categories: "sought treatment" and "did not seek treatment."</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Independent variables</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Migration of adult children</p>
</st>
<p>In this study, we have defined an out-migrant child as one living outside their parents' province. We have used migration of adult children as a main independent variable. This variable was split into two categories: "0 no migrant child" and "1 at least one migrant child."</p>
<p>The other demographic and socioeconomic variables were used as control variables in this study. Many previous studies have shown that demographic and socioeconomic variables have strong effects on health and health care-seeking behavior. Hence we needed to control for their effect to determine the independent effect of migration. Demographic variables included age (60-69 years, 70-79 years, and 80 years and above), sex (male and female), place of residence (urban and rural), and number of respondent's children. The economic variable was the average total income per year (100,000 baht or more, 30,000-99,999 baht, 10,000-29,999 baht, and less than 10,000 baht). Social variables included education (higher than secondary level, secondary level, primary/elementary level, no schooling) and living arrangements (living alone, living with children, living with other relatives).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Methods of analysis</p>
</st>
<p>Analysis for this study was confined to those who were aged 60 years or above and who had at least one child (biological or step/adopted) (n = 28,677). Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to analyze the data. Initially, univariate or descriptive analysis was used to describe the respondents' socio-demographic characteristics. Then, after controlling for the other socio-demographic and economic variables, multivariate analysis in the form of logistic regression was used to identify whether migration of adult children affected the elderly's likelihood of experiencing symptoms of diseases, self-assessed health, experience of chronic diseases, illnesses, and treatment-seeking behavior.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Sociodemographic and economic characteristics of the sample population</p>
</st>
<p>More than half of the sampled respondents were aged 60-69 while about one out of seven were aged 80 or above, and nearly three out of five were female. The large majority had only an elementary-level education. Respondents had an average of 4 children. About three in five respondents were from rural areas. Half reported that their household income per year was about 30,000 baht or less. Only about one in ten elderly lived alone, and two-thirds had at least one migrant child. About four in five elderly (79%) who had at least one migrant child had received money from their child(ren) during the 12 months preceding the survey (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>).</p>
<tbl id="T1"><title><p>Table 1</p></title><caption><p>Selected background characteristics of the sampled elderly</p></caption><tblbdy cols="4">
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Characteristics</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>%</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>N</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Age group</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>60-69 years</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>52.6</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>15,089</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>70-79 years</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>34.3</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>9,824</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>80 years or +</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>13.1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>3,764</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Sex</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Male</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>44.0</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>12,626</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Female</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>56.0</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>16,051</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Place of residence</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Rural</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>57.1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>16,365</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Urban</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>42.9</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>12,312</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Level of education</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Higher than secondary</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>3.8</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>1,080</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Secondary level</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>7.1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>2,026</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Primary or below</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>89.2</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>25,571</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Number of children</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>One</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>8.0</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>2,303</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Two</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>16.3</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>4,688</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Three</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>19.7</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>5,653</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Four</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>17.5</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>5,030</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Five or more</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>38.4</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>11,003</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <it>
                  <b>Mean no. children</b>
               </it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center" cspan="2">
            <p>
               <b>4.2</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Living arrangement</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Alone</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>7.5</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>2,151</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>With child (ren)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>61.9</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>17,742</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>With other relatives</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>30.6</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>8,784</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Average household income per year</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>100,000 baht or more</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>16.0</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>4,578</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>30,000-99,999 baht</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>33.9</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>9,715</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Less than 30,000 baht</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>50.1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>14,363</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Migration of child(ren)</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>No</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>32.8</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>9,402</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Yes</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>67.2</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>19,275</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Total</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>100.0</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>28,677</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Received money (baht) during the preceding 12 months from migrant children#</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>None</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>20.9</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>4,031</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Up to 4999 baht</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>21.8</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>4,199</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>5000-9999 baht</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>17.8</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>3,424</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>10000-29999 baht</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>25.6</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>4,930</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>30000 or above baht</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>14.0</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>2,691</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Total</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>100.0</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>19,275</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p># Only those elderly who had migrant child(ren), 1USD = approx. 30 Baht</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Health status and health care-seeking behavior</p>
</st>
<p>Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr> shows that a slightly higher proportion of elderly who had migrant child(ren) had at least one symptom of poor mental health during the month before the survey compared to those whose children had not migrated (56%). Furthermore, more than half (56%) of the elderly rated their health as poor, and nearly half (44%) reported that they suffered from at least one chronic disease. Overall, about two-thirds of the elderly had symptoms of an illness (65%) during the five years preceding the survey. No observed differences were found among elderly (by migration status of children) in terms of self-assessed health, number of chronic diseases, or illnesses during the previous 5 years.</p>
<tbl id="T2"><title><p>Table 2</p></title><caption><p>Health status and healthcare-seeking behavior among elderly according to migration status of child(ren)</p></caption><tblbdy cols="4">
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>With migrant child(ren)</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Without migrant child</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Total</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Symptoms of poor mental health</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>No symptom</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>41.0</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>44.1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>42.0</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>1 symptom</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>14.3</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>13.3</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>14.0</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>2 symptoms</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>16.1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>15.4</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>15.9</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>3 or more symptoms</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>28.5</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>27.3</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>28.1</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Self assessed health</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Good health</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>43.8</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>44.5</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>44.0</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Poor health</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>56.2</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>55.5</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>56.0</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Number of chronic diseases</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>No</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>55.9</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>56.2</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>56.0</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>1 disease</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>29.1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>29.2</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>29.1</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>2 diseases</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>11.7</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>11.6</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>11.7</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>3 or more diseases</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.3</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.0</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.2</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Illness during the previous 5 years</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Yes</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>64.6</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>64.7</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>64.7</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>No</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>35.4</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>35.3</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>35.3</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Total</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>100.0</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>100.0</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>100.0</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>N</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>19,275</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>9,402</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>28,677</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Treatment sought for the most recent illness+</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Yes</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>89.0</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>86.5</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>88.2</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>No</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>11.0</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>13.5</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>11.8</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Total</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>100.0</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>100.0</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>100.0</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>N</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>12,455</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>6,086</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>18,541</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>
         <it>Note: + = only those who felt sick during the previous 5 years</it>
      </p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<p>It is encouraging to note that an overwhelming majority of elderly who felt sick (88%) had sought treatment for their most recent illness. Interestingly, a higher proportion of the elderly who had migrant child(ren) had sought treatment for the last illness compared to those whose children did not migrate (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Multivariate analysis</p>
</st>
<p>Logistic regression was used to assess the net effect of the migration of children on the health of the elderly left behind and their treatment-seeking behavior after controlling for the other control variables in the model.</p>
<p>Separate logistic regressions were run for 5 dependent variables. The odds ratio is presented in Table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr>. Control variables used in this logistic analysis were categorical indicators of age (60-69, 70-79, and 80 or above), sex (male, female), place of residence (rural, urban), level of education (higher than secondary, secondary, and primary and below), living arrangements (living alone, with children, with other relatives), number of children respondents had, and average household income per year (100,000 baht or more, 30,000-99,999 baht, and less than 30,000). In the model, the reference group of the independent variable is "no migration of adult children."</p>
<tbl id="T3"><title><p>Table 3</p></title><caption><p>Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the effect of children's out-migration on elderly's experience of health problems (symptoms/diseases), perceived health status, chronic disease, illness and treatment-seeking behavior</p></caption><tblbdy cols="4">
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center" cspan="3">
            <p>
               <b>No out-migration of adult children = reference category</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Dependent variables</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>OR</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>CI</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Cox &amp; Shell R square</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left" cspan="3">
            <p>
               <b>Mental health status (n = 28, 677)</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><b>Symptoms of poor mental health </b>(ref: No symptom)</p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>At least one poor mental health symptom</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.10***</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.05-1.17</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.124</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left" cspan="4">
            <p>
               <b>Perceived health status within previous 7 days (n = 28, 677)</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><b>Self-assessed health </b>(ref: Good )</p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Poor</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.03</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.98-1.09</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.128</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left" cspan="4">
            <p>
               <b>Chronic diseases (n = 28, 677)</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><b>Chronic disease </b>(ref: No)</p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>At least one chronic disease</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.02</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.97-1.08</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.161</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left" cspan="4">
            <p>
               <b>Illness (n = 28, 677)</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><b>Felt sick during the previous 5 years </b>(ref: No)</p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Yes</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.00</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.95-1.07</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.116</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left" cspan="4">
            <p>
               <b>Healthcare-seeking behavior (n = 18, 541)</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><b>Treatment sought for the last illness </b>(ref: No)</p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Yes</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.22***</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.11-1.33</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.113</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p><it>Notes: Logistic regression was run separately for each dependent variable</it>.</p>
      <p><it>Models were fitted after controlling for age, sex, place of residence, education, number of children, living arrangements, and household income</it>.</p>
      <p>
         <it>*** = p &lt; 0.001</it>
      </p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<p>Migration of children was found to have a strong association with poor mental health symptoms among the elderly left behind. Those elderly who had at least one migrant child were more likely (OR = 1.10; 95% CI 1.05-1.17) to have poor mental health symptoms than those whose children had not migrated. On the other hand, no significant association was observed with physical health, such as experience of chronic disease, self-rated health status, or experience of symptoms of illness during the previous 5 years.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the results show that the migration of children is a significant predictor of treatment-seeking behavior among the elderly left behind. For instance, those elderly who had at least one migrant child were more likely (OR = 1.22; 95% CI 1.11-1.33) to seek treatment for their most recent illness than were those who had no migrant children (Table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Discussion</p>
</st>
<p>This study has attempted to investigate the impact of out-migration of adult children on health issues and health care-seeking behavior of the elderly left behind in a society in which, traditionally, children take responsibility for older parents. Findings show that the majority of the elderly (68%) have at least one out-migrant child and that an overwhelming majority (79%) received money from their migrant children.</p>
<p>Out-migration of adult children was highly associated with poor mental health symptoms among the elderly left behind. It is likely that out-migration of children reduces opportunities for face-to-face interaction. This finding is similar to other studies <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp> that found that out-migration of young people increased the loneliness felt by their aging parents. However, the findings of present study conflict with those of Abas et al., which found that out-migration of children was associated with less depression in parents <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. This could be due to the fact that in their study most of the parents with migrant children were male, better educated, and married which would reduce the risk of depression.</p>
<p>Our study found that the migration status of children was not associated with the physical health of the elderly left behind (as measured by self-rated health, experience of chronic diseases, and illnesses during the 5 years preceding the survey). It should be noted that this may be because adult children are less likely to migrate when a parent is ill <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. However, out-migration of adult children was independently associated with higher utilization of health facilities among the elderly left behind. It is encouraging to note that a significantly higher proportion of the elderly who had migrant children sought treatment compared to those who had no migrant child. This may be a result of remittances from migrant children, which make healthcare affordable. Indeed, about four-fifths of the sampled elderly had received money from their migrant children in the year preceding the survey.</p>
<p>An earlier national survey in Thailand also found that 77% of Thai elderly reported receiving financial support from children during the previous year <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B28">28</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Furthermore, after controlling the demographic, and socio-economic variables <sup>a</sup>, we also found that those who had received remittances from their children were more likely (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.30-1.57) to seek treatment than those who had no migrant children. This could be due to the fact that the benefits of remittances offset the potential negative effect of migrant children living apart from their parents. The financial support provided by migrant children may operate primarily through amelioration of financial hardship of their parents. Studies have also found that most elderly Thai parents are getting financial support from their children and that this contributes positively to their material well-being <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B29">29</abbr>
<abbr bid="B30">30</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Many families with migrant members moving within and between low- and middle-income countries tend to benefit economically <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B31">31</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and to enjoy improved general health <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The other reason could be that adult migrant children can provide emotional support to their parents back home (by visiting home or via frequent telephone calls, mail, etc.) or provide both emotional and financial support <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
</abbrgrp> that help parents maintain good health through improvement of emotional and psychosocial well-being <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Yet another reason could be health knowledge transfers between migrants and their parents who are left behind.</p>
<p>There are some limitations in the interpretation of the results of this study. Because of the survey's cross-sectional design, all of the factors analyzed in the study were measured at a single point in time. Thus, the analysis can only provide evidence of statistical association between those items and the health status of the elderly left behind and health care-seeking behavior; it cannot show a cause-effect relationship. Besides, we have to be careful while comparing the results of this study with those of other research studies that have used pre-existing validated questionnaires to measure mental and physical health.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusion</p>
</st>
<p>Our study provides novel evidence on an issue of special importance to countries affected by heavy out-migration of adult children, an issue that has received little attention. Findings here show that out-migration of adult children is highly associated with poor mental health but is not associated with the physical health of elderly left behind. Out-migration of children is also highly associated with greater utilization of health facilities. Thus, in order to decrease morbidity among the elderly as well as to maintain and enhance the well-being of families, programs should focus on alleviating the symptoms of poor mental health among the elderly left behind and aim to reduce the differences in utilization of health care-seeking behavior among elderly with children present in the community and elderly left behind.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Endnotes</p>
</st>
<p>
<b>a. </b>We were unable to keep both 'remittances' and 'out migration of children' in the same model as it is highly correlated. Therefore, we run separately to see the association between 'remittance' and 'treatment seeking' variables after controlling for other demographic and socio-economic variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Competing interests</p>
</st>
<p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Authors' contributions</p>
</st>
<p>RA analyzed, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. AJ and AC commented and provided suggestions on the analysis and interpretation. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
</bdy><bm>
<ack>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Acknowledgements</p>
</st>
<p>The authors thank the National Statistical Office (NSO) of Thailand for providing access to the data. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Kerry Richter and Dr. Kusol Soonthorndhada for their valuable suggestions for this paper.</p>
</sec>
</ack>
<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>Labour and social trends in Asia and the Pacific 2006</p></title><aug><au><cnm>International Labour organization (ILO)</cnm></au></aug><source>Progress towards decent work</source><publisher>ILO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok</publisher></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>Migration and health in the European Union</p></title><aug><au><snm>Carballo</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Divino</snm><fnm>JJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Zeric</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Tropical Medicine and International Health</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>3</volume><fpage>936</fpage><lpage>44</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1365-3156.1998.00337.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9892278</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Migration and Demographic surveillance: an overview of opportunities and challenges</p></title><aug><au><snm>White</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au><au><cnm>INDEPTH Network Perspectives</cnm></au></aug><source>The dynamics of migration, health and livelihoods</source><publisher>England</publisher><editor>Collinson M, Adazu K, White M &amp; Findley S</editor><pubdate>2009</pubdate><fpage>3</fpage><lpage>18</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>Dynamics of Intergenerational Assistance in Middle- and Old-Age in Mexico in Health of Aging Hispanics</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wong</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Monica</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><publisher>New York: Springer Publishing</publisher><editor>Jacqueline L. Angel, Keith E. Whitfield</editor><pubdate>2007</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Population ageing in East and South-East Asia: Current situation and Emerging Challenges. Paper in population ageing no 1</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mujahid</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><publisher>UNFPA Country technical services Team for East and South-East Asia, Bangkok, Thailand</publisher><pubdate>2006</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>Patterns and determinants of living arrangements</p></title><aug><au><snm>Knodel</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Ofstedal</snm><fnm>MB</fnm></au></aug><source>In The well-being of the Elderly in Asia</source><publisher>Ann Arbor: the University of Michigan Press</publisher><editor>Hermalin A.I</editor><pubdate>2005</pubdate><fpage>101</fpage><lpage>131</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Female labor migration to Bangkok: transforming rural-urban interactions and social-networks through globalization</p></title><aug><au><snm>Clausen</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Asia-Pacific Population Journal</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>53</fpage><lpage>78</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>Bridging the gap: internal migration in Asia</p></title><aug><au><snm>Guest</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug></bibl><bibl id="B9"><source>Paper prepared for Conference on African Migration in Comparative Perspective</source><publisher>Johannesburg, South Africa</publisher><pubdate>2003</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>Assessing the consequences of internal migration: methodological issues and a case study on Thailand based on longitudinal household survey data</p></title><aug><au><snm>Guest</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Migration, Urbanization, and Development: New Directions and Issues</source><publisher>New York: United Nations Population Fund</publisher><editor>R.E. Bilsborrow</editor><pubdate>1998</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>The impact of labor migration on the children left behind: a study of elementary school children in the Philippines, SOJOURN</p></title><aug><au><snm>Battistella</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Gastardo-Conaco</snm><fnm>MCG</fnm></au></aug><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>220_241</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>Summary Report for Working Group B, Workshop on Approaches to Data Collection and Data Management, 8_9 September 2003</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tiemoko</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><pubdate>Geneva</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>The impact of migration on children in Moldova 2008</p></title><aug><au><cnm>UNICEF</cnm></au></aug><note>Retrieved from <url>http://www.unicef.org/The_Impacts_of_Migration_on_Children_in_Moldova(1).pdf</url></note></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Migration and development: the importance of gender</p></title><aug><au><snm>Chant</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Radcliffe</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Gender and migration in developing countries</source><publisher>New York: Belhaven Press</publisher><editor>Chant, S</editor><pubdate>1992</pubdate><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>29</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>Migration Incentives, migration types: the role of relative deprivation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Stark</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Taylor</snm><fnm>JE</fnm></au></aug><source>The economic journal</source><pubdate>1991</pubdate><volume>101</volume><issue>408</issue><fpage>1163</fpage><lpage>1178</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/2234433</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>An evaluation of international migration theory: the North American case</p></title><aug><au><snm>Massey</snm><fnm>DS</fnm></au><au><snm>Arango</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Hugo</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Kouaouci</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Pellegrino</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Taylor</snm><fnm>EJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Population and development Review</source><pubdate>1993</pubdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>699</fpage><lpage>751</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/2137660</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><title><p>Health consequences of migration: Evidence from South Africa's rural Northeast</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kahn</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Collinson</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Tollman</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Wolff</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Garenne</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Clark</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Paper presented at the conference on African Migration in Comparative Perspective</source><publisher>Johannesburg, South Africa</publisher><pubdate>2003</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>The Effect of Children's Migration on Elderly Kin's Health: A Counterfactual Approach."</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kuhn</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Bethany</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Rachel</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><publisher>Mimeo. University of Denver</publisher><pubdate>2009</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>A longitudinal analysis of health and mortality in a migrant-sending region of Bangladesh</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kuhn</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><pubdate>2004</pubdate><note>Retrieved from <url>http://ibs.colorado.edu/~kuhnr/pdf/mighealth-final.pdf</url></note></bibl><bibl id="B20"><title><p>In the absence of their men: the impact of male migration on women</p></title><aug><au><snm>Gulati</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au></aug><publisher>London: Sage publications</publisher><pubdate>1993</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p>Oversease migration and the well being of those left behind in rural communities of Bangladesh</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hadi</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Asia-Pacific Population Journal</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>14</volume><fpage>43</fpage><lpage>58</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">12295290</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B22"><title><p>Rural-Urban migration and depression in ageing family members left behind</p></title><aug><au><snm>Abas</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au><au><snm>Punpuing</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Jirapramukpitak</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Guest</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Tangchonlatip</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Leese</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Prince</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>The British Journal of Psychiatry</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>195</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>54</fpage><lpage>60</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1192/bjp.bp.108.056143</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2802522</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">19567897</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B23"><title><p>Report of the second world assembly on ageing</p></title><aug><au><cnm>United Nations</cnm></au></aug><publisher>Madrid</publisher><pubdate>2002</pubdate><fpage>8</fpage><lpage>12</lpage><note>United Nations</note></bibl><bibl id="B24"><title><p>How Does Adult Child Migration Affect Elderly Parent Health?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Antman</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Evidence from Mexico</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><note>Retrieved from <url>http://spot.colorado.edu/~antmanf/Antman_Migration&amp;ElderlyHealth.pdf</url></note></bibl><bibl id="B25"><title><p>Report of the 1994 survey of elderly in Thailand</p></title><aug><au><cnm>National Statistical Office (NSO)</cnm></au></aug><publisher>Bangkok: National Statistical Office</publisher><note>No date</note></bibl><bibl id="B26"><title><p>Report of the 2002 survey of elderly in Thailand</p></title><aug><au><cnm>National Statistical Office (NSO)</cnm></au></aug><publisher>Bangkok: National Statistical Office</publisher><pubdate>2002</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B27"><title><p>Report of the 2007 survey of older persons in Thailand</p></title><aug><au><cnm>National Statistical Office (NSO)</cnm></au></aug><publisher>Bangkok: National Statistical Office</publisher><pubdate>2008</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B28"><title><p>Elderly Parent Health and the Migration Decisions of Adult Children</p></title><aug><au><snm>Giles</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Mu</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Evidence from Rural China</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>44</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>265</fpage><lpage>288</lpage><note>Demography</note></bibl><bibl id="B29"><title><p>Rural parents with urban children: Social and Economic implications of migration on the rural elderly in Thailand</p></title><aug><au><snm>Knodel</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Saengtienchai</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Population, Space and Place</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>13</volume><fpage>193</fpage><lpage>210</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/psp.436</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B30"><title><p>Paper in Population ageing No.2. Migration and intergenerational solidarity: Evidence from Rural Thailand</p></title><aug><au><snm>Knodel</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Kespichayawattana</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Wiwatwanich</snm><fnm></fnm></au><au><snm>Saengtienchai</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><publisher>UNFPA Thailand and Country technical services team for East and South-East Asia, Bangkok</publisher><pubdate>2007</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B31"><title><p>How left behind are rural parents of migrant children?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Knodel</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Kespichayawattana</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Saengtienchai</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Wiwatwanich</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Evidence from Thailand. Ageing and Society</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B32"><title><p>International Migration, Economic Development and Policy</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ozden</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Maurice</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><publisher>Palgrave Macmillan</publisher><pubdate>2007</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B33"><title><p>Migration and remittances: urban income and rural household in the Philipines</p></title><aug><au><snm>Trager</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Developing Areas</source><pubdate>1984</pubdate><volume>13</volume><fpage>317</fpage><lpage>40</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">12339814</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B34"><title><p>The health effects of emigration on those who remain at home</p></title><aug><au><snm>Burazeri</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Goda</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Tavanxhi</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Sulo</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Stefa</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Kark</snm><fnm>JD</fnm></au></aug><source>International journal of epidemiology</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>36</volume><fpage>1265</fpage><lpage>1272</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/ije/dym162</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17768161</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl></refgrp>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Pre-publication history</p>
</st>
<p>The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:</p>
<p>
<url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/143/prepub</url>
</p>
</sec>
</bm></art>