<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
	<ui>1471-2407-7-141</ui>
	<ji>1471-2407</ji>
	<fm>
		<dochead>Research article</dochead>
		<bibl>
			<title>
				<p>Metabolic profiling of human brain metastases using in vivo proton MR spectroscopy at 3T</p>
			</title>
			<aug>
				<au id="A1" ca="yes">
					<snm>Sj&#248;bakk</snm>
					<mi>E</mi>
					<fnm>Torill</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<email>Torill.Sjobakk@ntnu.no</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A2">
					<snm>Johansen</snm>
					<fnm>Roar</fnm>
					<insr iid="I2"/>
					<email>roar.johansen@ntnu.no</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A3">
					<snm>Bathen</snm>
					<mi>F</mi>
					<fnm>Tone</fnm>
					<insr iid="I3"/>
					<email>tone.f.bathen@ntnu.no</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A4">
					<snm>Sonnewald</snm>
					<fnm>Ursula</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<email>Ursula.Sonnewald@ntnu.no</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A5">
					<snm>Kvistad</snm>
					<mi>A</mi>
					<fnm>Kjell</fnm>
					<insr iid="I4"/>
					<email>Kjell.Arne.Kvistad@stolav.no</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A6">
					<snm>Lundgren</snm>
					<fnm>Steinar</fnm>
					<insr iid="I2"/>
					<insr iid="I5"/>
					<email>Steinar.Lundgren@stolav.no</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A7">
					<snm>Gribbestad</snm>
					<mi>S</mi>
					<fnm>Ingrid</fnm>
					<insr iid="I3"/>
					<email>ingrid.s.gribbestad@ntnu.no</email>
				</au>
			</aug>
			<insg>
				<ins id="I1">
					<p>Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Norway</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I2">
					<p>Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I3">
					<p>Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I4">
					<p>Department of Radiology, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I5">
					<p>Department of Oncology, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway</p>
				</ins>
			</insg>
			<source>BMC Cancer</source>
			<issn>1471-2407</issn>
			<pubdate>2007</pubdate>
			<volume>7</volume>
			<issue>1</issue>
			<fpage>141</fpage>
			<url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/7/141</url>
			<xrefbib>
				<pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmpid">17662122</pubid><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2407-7-141</pubid>
				</pubidlist></xrefbib>
		</bibl>
		<history>
			<rec>
				<date>
					<day>20</day>
					<month>3</month>
					<year>2007</year>
				</date>
			</rec>
			<acc>
				<date>
					<day>27</day>
					<month>7</month>
					<year>2007</year>
				</date>
			</acc>
			<pub>
				<date>
					<day>27</day>
					<month>7</month>
					<year>2007</year>
				</date>
			</pub>
		</history>
		<cpyrt>
			<year>2007</year>
			<collab>Sj&#248;bakk et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab>
			<note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note>
		</cpyrt>
		<abs>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Abstract</p>
				</st>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Background</p>
					</st>
					<p>Metastases to the central nervous system from different primary cancers are an oncologic challenge as the overall prognosis for these patients is generally poor. The incidence of brain metastases varies with type of primary cancer and is probably increasing due to improved therapies of extracranial metastases prolonging patient's overall survival and thereby time for brain metastases to develop. In addition, the greater access to improved neuroimaging techniques can provide earlier diagnosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and multivariate analyses to characterize brain metastases originating from different primary cancers, to assess changes in spectra during radiation treatment and to correlate the spectra to clinical outcome after treatment.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Methods</p>
					</st>
					<p>Patients (n = 26) with brain metastases were examined using single voxel MRS at a 3T clinical MR system. Five patients were excluded due to poor spectral quality. The spectra were obtained before start (n = 21 patients), immediately after (n = 6 patients) and two months after end of treatment (n = 4 patients). Principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least square regression analysis (PLS) were applied in order to identify clustering of spectra due to origin of metastases and to relate clinical outcome (survival) of the patients to spectral data from the first MR examination.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Results</p>
					</st>
					<p>The PCA results indicated that brain metastases from primary lung and breast cancer were separated into two clusters, while the metastases from malignant melanomas showed no uniformity. The PLS analysis showed a significant correlation between MR spectral data and survival five months after MRS before start of treatment.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Conclusion</p>
					</st>
					<p>MRS determined metabolic profiles analysed by PCA and PLS might give valuable clinical information when planning and evaluating the treatment of brain metastases, and also when deciding to terminate further therapies.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
		</abs>
	</fm>
	<bdy>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Background</p>
			</st>
			<p>Brain metastases are a common oncologic challenge as approximately 15&#8211;20 % of all cancer patients develop central nervous system metastases. They are the dominating type of brain tumor and are most frequently caused by haematogenous spread from a primary cancer in lung, breast, skin or colon <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>. Survival varies with type and grade of primary cancer, age at diagnosis as well as extent of proliferation of the primary cancer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp>. The overall prognosis of survival for these patients is generally poor and the management of the disease is a significant challenge.</p>
			<p>A major goal in oncology treatment is to give each patient an individualized therapeutic regime. In addition to diagnosis, the patient's pre-treatment performance status described by Karnofsky performance score (KPS) and the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) is evaluated <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp>. The standard treatment is whole-brain-radiation-therapy (WBRT) alone or after surgery which may prolong life from one to nine months <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr></abbrgrp>. Radiation therapy is the most common treatment strategy since more than 70 % of the patients have multiple metastases at the time of diagnosis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp>. Chemotherapy may also be used in selected patients. To decide between different treatment options various prognostic factors such as age, performance status, numbers of brain metastases and type of primary cancer and extent of extracranial metastases activity are evaluated. Some patients get their brain metastases detected before the primary cancer and a non-invasive identification of type of metastases would be of importance for further treatment <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp>. In order to optimize and avoid ineffective treatment there are also a need for early evaluation of response. The diagnosis and planning of brain tumor treatment have become more advanced due to improved diagnostic neuroimaging tools. One of these is in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) which provides additional information for classifying most brain tumor types and grades <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
			<p>Proton (<sup>1</sup>H) in vivo MRS can be used to quantify metabolites and monitor response to therapy in brain tumors, thereby allowing non-invasive monitoring of tumor biochemistry <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp>. Previous studies have used 1.5T systems for classification and characterisations of brain tumors. Recent clinical instrument operating at 3T has improved spectral quality related to resolution and signal-to-noise-ratio <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr></abbrgrp>. The main metabolites in proton spectra of normal brain tissue are N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), creatine (Cr) and choline-containing compounds (tCho) at 2.0, 3.0 and 3.2 ppm, respectively. In brain malignancies lipid signals at 1.3 (methylene) and 0.9 ppm (methyl) appear when short echo times are used <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr></abbrgrp>. Previous studies have addressed metabolic changes in primary brain tumors occurring after radiation therapy <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>. The reports from different groups are not conclusive but reduction in tCho appears to be a reliable marker for treatment response. Among the parameters being predictive for poorer outcome in certain patient sub-groups were higher tCho/Cr and tCho/NAA ratios and higher lipid signals and lower Cr/NAA ratio <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr></abbrgrp>. Less is known about brain metastases and the objectives of this study were to characterize brain metastases originating from different primary cancers, to assess changes in spectra during radiation treatment and to correlate the spectra to clinical outcome for the patients after treatment. Our hypothesis is that in vivo MRS from different brain metastases analysed by multivariate analyses distinguish metastases originating from different primary tumors, and also that MR spectra can indicate clinical outcome for these patients.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Methods</p>
			</st>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Patients</p>
				</st>
				<p>A total of 26 consecutive patients (18 women and 8 men) with brain metastases from primary cancers such as breast (n = 9), lung (n = 9), malignant melanoma (n = 4), colon (n = 3) and kidney (n = 1) were enrolled in this study. All patients gave a written informed consent and the study was approved by the local ethics board; Central Norway medical reach ethics committee. After contrast enhanced MRI, metastases larger than 10 mm in diameter were chosen for MRS. The quality evaluation of each MR spectrum, led to the exclusion of five of the 26 enrolled patients (one from each primary cancer group). A description of the 21 remaining patients is given in Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>. Six patients came to a second examination immediately after completed radiation treatment and four patients to a third MRI/MRS examination after additional two months. The same size of volume of interest (VOI) was used in each of the repeated examinations. The patients' performance status (KPS and RPA) was determined before start of treatment.</p>
				<tbl id="T1">
					<title>
						<p>Table 1</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Patient characteristic. Treatment and clinical outcome data for all patients with approved MR spectra.</p>
					</caption>
					<tblbdy cols="11">
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>Patient no.</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>Sex, Age</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>Primary cancer</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>Brain mets</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>Mets other sites than brain</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>KPS</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>RPA</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>Survival (months)</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>Treatment</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>Time: diagnosis- 1.MRS (weeks)</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>Spectral data TE, VOI</b>
									<sup>1,2</sup>
								</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c cspan="11">
								<hr/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>1</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>F, 52</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Breast</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Single</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Brain only</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>90</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>1</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>13+</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>S + 3Gyx10</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>5</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>32,144<sup>1</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>2</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>M, 44</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Lung</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Single</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Brain only*</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>90</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>1</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>10+</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>S</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>1</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>33,144<sup>2</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>3</b>
									<sup>a</sup>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>F, 47</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Lung</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Multiple</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Brain only</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>90</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>1</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>7+</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>C</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>32,144<sup>1</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>4</b>
									<sup>a</sup>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>F, 45</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Breast</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Multiple</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Mediastinum</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>100</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>15+</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>S + 3Gyx10</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>1</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>33,144<sup>2</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>5</b>
									<sup>a</sup>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>F, 48</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Breast</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Multiple</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Skeleton*</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>100</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>5+</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>3Gyx10</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>33<sup>2</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>6</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>F, 57</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Lung</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Multiple</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Intestinal, jejunum</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>100</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>7</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>3Gyx10</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>4</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>32,144<sup>1</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>7</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>M, 63</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Lung</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Multiple</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Lung, skeleton</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>100</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>6</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>3Gyx10</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>32,144<sup>1</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>8</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>M, 62</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Lung</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Single</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Skeleton</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>90</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>4.5</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>S + 3Gyx10</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>4</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>33,144<sup>2</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>9</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>M, 70</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Mal. mel.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Multiple</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Lung, subcutan*</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>90</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>S + 3Gyx10</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>3</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>33 in 2 VOI<sup>2</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>10</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>F, 36</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Breast</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Multiple</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Liver, skeleton</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>80</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>9</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>4Gyx5 (GK)</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>1</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>32,144<sup>1</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>11</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>F, 47</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Breast</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Multiple</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Liver</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>80</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>10</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>3Gyx10</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>32,144<sup>1</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>12</b>
									<sup>b</sup>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>F, 66</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Breast</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Multiple</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Brain only</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>80</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>3Gyx10</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>3</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>33 in 2 VOI<sup>2</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>13</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>M, 70</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Colon</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Single</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Liver, lung</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>80</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>6</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>S + 4Gyx5</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>17</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>33,144<sup>1</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>14</b>
									<sup>b</sup>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>F, 80</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Lung</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Multiple</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Brain only</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>80</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.75</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>4Gyx5</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>1</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>33 in 2 VOI<sup>2</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>15</b>
									<sup>a</sup>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>F, 71</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Lung</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Multiple</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Brain only</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>80</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>3</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>3Gyx10</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>4</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>33 in 2 VOI<sup>2</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>16</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>F, 72</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Breast</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Multiple</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Liver, skeleton</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>60</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>3</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.5</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>4Gyx5</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>33,144<sup>2</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>17</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>M, 69</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Colon</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Single</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Liver, lung</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>60</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>3</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>6</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>S + 3Gyx10</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>5</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>32,144<sup>1</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>18</b>
									<sup>a</sup>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>F, 53</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Lung</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Multiple</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Brain only*</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>60</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>3</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>11+</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>4Gyx5</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>33 in 2 VOI<sup>2</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>19</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>M, 56</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Mal. mel.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Multiple</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Epigastrium</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>60</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>3</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>1</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>No Treatment</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>33<sup>2 </sup>and 32<sup>1</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>20</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>F, 63</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Breast</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Single</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Lung, skeleton, lymph node</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>50</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>3</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.5</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>No treatment</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>33,144<sup>2</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>21</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>F, 71</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Mal. mel.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Single</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Lung, liver</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>50</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>3</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>1.5</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>3Gyx10</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>8</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>32,144<sup>1</sup></p>
							</c>
						</r>
					</tblbdy>
					<tblfn>
						<p>F = female, M = male, mets = metastases, <sup>a</sup>: three MRS follow-up examinations, <sup>b</sup>: two follow-up MRS examinations, *: brain metastases detected before primary cancer, KPS = Karnofsky Performance Score, RPA = Recursive Partitioning Analysis classification, TE = echo time, VOI<sup>1,2 </sup>= volume of interest, <sup>1</sup>: voxel size: 15 &#215; 15 &#215; 15 mm<sup>3</sup>, <sup>2</sup>: 10 &#215; 10 &#215; 10 mm<sup>3</sup>. Mal. mel. = malignant melanoma, GK = gamma knife, S = Brain surgery and histopathologic verification, C = Chemotherapy.</p>
					</tblfn>
				</tbl>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>In vivo MR spectroscopy</p>
				</st>
				<p>MR imaging and spectroscopy examinations were performed using a 3T clinical MR system (Philips Intera, Best, The Netherlands) equipped with a transmit-receive head coil. The MRI protocol consisted of conventional T<sub>1 </sub>&#8211; and T<sub>2 </sub>&#8211; weighted images before and after an intravenous injection of 0.2 ml Gadodiamide/kg body weight (Omniscan&#8482;, GE Healthcare). Single voxel <sup>1</sup>H MRS was performed after contrast injection on a VOI localized within the metastases using the point resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) pulse sequence, repetition time (TR) of 2000 ms and echo time (TE) of 32/33 ms. When only one metastasis (&gt; 10 mm) was detected, a second MRS acquisition was performed of the same volume using TE = 144 ms (18 patients). If two or more large metastases were identified by the MRI, a second spectrum was obtained using the short TE in one of the other tumors (7 patients). The VOI was 15 &#215; 15 &#215; 15 or 10 &#215; 10 &#215; 10 mm<sup>3</sup>, depending on the size of the actual metastasis, and all localizations were verified by an experienced neuroradiologist. Bandwidth, number of points and sampling interval were 2000 Hz/1024/0.5 ms. Each spectrum was obtained as an average of 192 measurements, giving an acquisition time of 7 minutes. Shimming (automatic) prolonged the acquisition time with about three minutes. A routine water unsuppressed spectrum (16 measurements) obtained at each examination was used to evaluate the spectrum quality. A total of 33 spectra with short and 18 spectra with long TE were obtained from brain metastases during the MRS examinations. The spectroscopic data were post-processed using jMRUI <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp>. The FIDs were zero-filled (2 K) and a Lorentzian filter (2 Hz) was applied before Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT). The residual peak of the water signal was suppressed using Hankel Lanczos Singular Values Decomposition Filter (HLSVD)<abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Data analyses</p>
				</st>
				<p>The spectral quality was evaluated by applying the algorithm AMARES to estimate the linewidth (full-width-half-maximum, FWHM) of the water peak signal in the corresponding water unsuppressed spectra. A mean FWHM &#177; SD of water peaks in all spectra was calculated (9.2 &#177; 2.1 Hz). The mean value with the corresponding positive 99% CI (2.1 Hz) was chosen as quality criteria. All spectra with a higher FWHM than 11.3 Hz were excluded from further data analyses. Spectral data were transferred to the software program Unscrambler (CAMO) as ASCII-files, Baseline offset was adjusted and the lipid signal at 1.3 ppm was used as a chemical shift reference. The spectra were mean normalised and examined using principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least square regression analysis (PLS). Only the chemical shift region including the resonances from lipids to tCho compounds (0.70 &#8211; 3.45 ppm/365 spectral points) was investigated. Mean spectra for each primary cancer group were made to illustrate the spectral variations.</p>
				<p>PCA was applied in order to identify clustering of spectra due to origin of metastases based on examination of score plots and loading profiles. The PCA model compresses or simplifies high-dimensional data by finding a linear combination of the original variables so the variance is maximized and new uncorrelated variables, principal components (PC) are created. To avoid that the model described too much of the variation in the data i.e. noise, the number of PCs to retain in the model was kept as low as possible. PCA was performed with full cross validation and mean centering.</p>
				<p>The PLS was applied in order to relate clinical outcome of the patients (survival or not at five months after first MR examination) to the spectral data (obtained at first MR examination). PLS is the regression extension of the PCA and the data are reduced into PLS factors which explain most of the variation in both predictors (MR spectra) and responses (clinical parameters). The number of PCs to remain in the model was determined by finding the PC where the total residual y-variance and root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) were minimized. For the PLS analysis the test set method was used as validation method. The test samples were selected in advance by using the Kennard Stones algorithm for splitting data sets into two subsets <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>, resulting in 14 samples for calibration and 7 samples for testing. The significance of the estimated correlation factors between measured and predicted y-variables was ascertained by using the Pearson correlation test (two-tailed).</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Results</p>
			</st>
			<p>Of the 33 short echo time spectra obtained from the enrolled 26 patients, six spectra were excluded due to a FWHM of the water signal larger than 11.3 Hz, likewise four of the eighteen spectra obtained at TE 144, leaving 27 spectra with short and 14 with long echo time for further analyses.</p>
			<p>Spectra from two distinct metastases were obtained in six patients (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). Typical axial T1 weighted contrast enhanced MR images with corresponding in vivo spectra of metastases in two breast cancer patients are given in Fig. <figr fid="F1">1</figr>. Mean spectra (short TE) &#177; 95% CI of the four different primary cancer groups are shown in Fig. <figr fid="F2">2</figr>. The lipid signals at 1.3 and 0.9 ppm were the dominating peaks in the majority of the spectra in all groups. Cr, tCho and a broad peak around 2.0 &#8211; 2.2 ppm were also detected in 17, 20 and 22 of the 27 spectra, respectively.</p>
			<fig id="F1">
				<title>
					<p>Figure 1</p>
				</title>
				<caption>
					<p>Brain metastases in vivo spectra</p>
				</caption>
				<text>
					<p><b>Brain metastases in vivo spectra</b>. Axial T1 weighted contrast enhanced MR images of two patients with brain metastases from breast cancer (patient 1 and 12) with corresponding spectra. A: short echo time spectra of two metastases (a and b). B: Short and long echo time spectra in the same VOI. The lipid peak at 1.3 ppm in the short echo time spectrum is cut due to the chosen scaling.</p>
				</text>
				<graphic file="1471-2407-7-141-1"/>
			</fig>
			<fig id="F2">
				<title>
					<p>Figure 2</p>
				</title>
				<caption>
					<p>Mean spectra</p>
				</caption>
				<text>
					<p><b>Mean spectra</b>. Short echo time mean spectra &#177; 95% CI of brain metastases from different primary cancer. A: lung cancer (n = 11 spectra), B: breast cancer (n = 9 spectra), C: malignant melanoma (n = 5 spectra), D: colon cancer (n = 2 spectra). The 0.7 &#8211; 3.4 ppm area of the spectra and the detected metabolites (in ppm) are given; tCho (3.2), Cr (3.0): creatine and lipids (1.3, 0.9): methylene and methyl groups.</p>
				</text>
				<graphic file="1471-2407-7-141-2"/>
			</fig>
			<p>The score plot from PCA of the 27 short echo time spectra obtained before start of treatment is presented in Fig. <figr fid="F3">3a</figr>. This plot indicates that brain metastases from primary lung and breast cancer tend to cluster, while the metastases from malignant melanomas show no uniformity. The two spectra of metastases from colon cancer are found in the lower right quadrant of the score plot. The separation of breast and lung metastases is based on PC1 and PC2, which account for more than 83 % of the total variation of the spectra. Samples with high score for PC1 are characterized by high lipid signal and no other metabolites, as described by the loading profile of PC1 (Fig. <figr fid="F3">3b</figr>).</p>
			<fig id="F3">
				<title>
					<p>Figure 3</p>
				</title>
				<caption>
					<p>PCA results</p>
				</caption>
				<text>
					<p><b>PCA results</b>. Part a: Score plot of PC1 versus PC2 of water suppressed in vivo spectra. &#9679; = breast cancer (n = 9), <b>X </b>= lung cancer (n = 11), <b>O </b>= malignant melanoma (n = 5), &#9660; = colon cancer (n = 2). Part b: The loading profile of PC1 showing differences in the lipid signals.</p>
				</text>
				<graphic file="1471-2407-7-141-3"/>
			</fig>
			<p>Figure <figr fid="F4">4</figr> gives a score plot of PC1 versus PC2 from the PLS relating spectra of untreated metastases to survival five months after treatment. The first two PCs explained totally 85 % of the x-variables (the spectral data) and 53 % of the y-variable (survival). The correlation factor between measured and predicted survival were 0.73 (p &lt; 0.01) for the calibration run and 0.76 (p &lt; 0.05) for the corresponding validation (seven test samples). The spectra of patients who survived five months after first MRS (marked as circles) are clustered on the right side of the score plot, while the spectra of patients who survived less than five months (cross marks) are clustered in the opposite side.</p>
			<fig id="F4">
				<title>
					<p>Figure 4</p>
				</title>
				<caption>
					<p>PLS score plot</p>
				</caption>
				<text>
					<p><b>PLS score plot</b>. Score plot of spectra from patients who lived longer than five months (<b>&#9675;</b>), and they who passed away before five months after the first MR spectra examination (<b>&#8224;</b>). The numbers refers to patient numbers in Table 1. Some patients were examined for two metastases (a and b).</p>
				</text>
				<graphic file="1471-2407-7-141-4"/>
			</fig>
			<p>Follow-up MRS examinations where completed only for four of the included patients, since some got a complete surgical resection of the metastasis, a few refused further examinations and some died shortly after the first or second examination (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). Two examples of the follow-up spectra are shown in Fig. <figr fid="F5">5</figr>. At the last examination four of the seven obtained spectra (four patients) showed decreased levels of the lipid signal (30&#8211;80 % peak intensity of mean normalized spectra). Of the ten second examination spectra six showed minor changes in the metabolite distribution, while three spectra indicated an increase in the 1.3 ppm lipid peak relative to the signal of methyl at 0.9 ppm. The tenth spectra, obtained from the patient treated with chemotherapy showed an increasing signal of NAA and Cr peak relative to Cho-containing signals at 3.2 ppm indicating normal brain tissue enclosed in the VOI due to the shrinking metastasis during the treatment period.</p>
			<fig id="F5">
				<title>
					<p>Figure 5</p>
				</title>
				<caption>
					<p>Follow-up spectra</p>
				</caption>
				<text>
					<p><b>Follow-up spectra</b>. Spectra of brain metastases from patients with primary breast (patient 4) and lung cancer (patient 15), before (-I), immediately after (-II) and two months after end of radiation treatment (-III). The patients' survival was more than 16 months and only 3 months, respectively.</p>
				</text>
				<graphic file="1471-2407-7-141-5"/>
			</fig>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Discussion</p>
			</st>
			<p>The results presented here demonstrate that the lipid signals are important in brain metastases characterization. The clustering of spectra from brain metastases from breast and lung cancer in the PCA score plot is described by PC1 showing the lipid signal as the dominating difference. The lipid signals are also an important factor in the PLS relating MR spectra to clinical outcome. These signals change after radiation therapy, which is in accordance to previous studies <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>. Many cellular processes such as proliferation, inflammation, malignancy, necrosis, growth arrest and apoptosis, have been linked to alterations in MR visible lipid levels. Intracellular lipid bodies appear to be the most important contributors <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, which biochemical processes that lead to lipid accumulation of MR visible signals is still enigmatic, and the source and complete characteristics of the lipids found mostly in high grade brain tumors are still not elucidated <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
			<p>Small signals of intracellular lipids might be observed in normal brain tissue in short echo time spectra and these signals are often increased in malignancies. In accordance with previous studies of brain tumors <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr></abbrgrp>, increased signals of lipids and also tCho compounds were detected in the majority of all spectra of brain metastases obtained with short echo time in this study (Fig. <figr fid="F2">2</figr>). The other main metabolites in spectra from normal brain tissue, NAA and Cr were definitely reduced in these spectra. The high intensity lipid signals and low levels of Cr are typical for metastases and have been used to differentiate these lesions from primary brain tumors <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, the spectral differences between metastases and high grade gliomas are small and these two groups might be hard to distinguish <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>. Methylene components in fatty acids give rise to a broad peak around 2.0 &#8211; 2.2 ppm <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp> and this might overlap any possible NAA present. At longer echo time the lipid signals will be reduced due to short relaxation time <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr></abbrgrp>, and in seven of the fourteen spectra obtained at TE 144, a small peak of NAA could be observed. Previous studies have interpreted that signal from NAA in metastases is due to the presence of viable neurons within an infiltrative tumour or contamination from normal brain tissue since NAA is a neuron specific metabolite <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
			<p>The use of multivariate analyses can reveal features in the spectra which may not be detectable with traditional statistical analyses of peak integral ratios <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B28">28</abbr><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr></abbrgrp>. The mean spectra from the different primary cancer groups showed minor differences in distribution of the metabolites. Still, the spectra from metastases in breast and lung cancer patients tend to cluster into different parts of the PCA score plot, the separation being mainly due to differences in the lipid signals as described by PC1 (Fig. <figr fid="F3">3b</figr>). The dispersion of the malignant melanoma spectra in the PCA score plot (Fig. <figr fid="F3">3a</figr>) reflects the large confidence interval for the corresponding averaged spectra (Fig. <figr fid="F2">2c</figr>).</p>
			<p>In this study, PLS was used to relate spectral data to clinical outcome for each patient. A trend of two separate clusters of patients surviving five months versus patients passing away before five months can be observed in the score plot (Fig. <figr fid="F4">4</figr>) The loading weights from PLS indicate that resonances in the ppm regions 0.8 &#8211; 0.9, 1.8 &#8211; 2.2 and 2.5 &#8211; 2.8 ppm representing different lipid signals are most important for the prediction. By seeing the patients' performance status in conjunction with the respective localization in the score plot (Fig. <figr fid="F4">4</figr>), patients classified as RPA2 and 3 are dispersed across the plot, while the RPA1 classified patients are clustered in the intermediate area. Patients classified as RPA3 might be interpreted to have a better prognosis if the spectral data appear to be in the survival area of the score plot. Thus, the use of multivariate analysis on the spectral data might be of importance to predict the outcome for patients with brain metastases.</p>
			<p>Half of the patients in this study received radiation therapy and the follow-up spectroscopy examinations were done immediately after completed treatment. However, only a few of these patients were able to fulfil the study protocol due to their health condition. The changes in level of mobile lipids and choline observed in spectra obtained after completed radiation therapy could reflect effects of the treatment observed at a metabolic level. Graves et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr></abbrgrp> have previously shown changes in the metabolic profile of recurrent gliomas up to 14 months after gamma knife surgery. They observed an increase in the lactate/lipid resonance that developed early after the treatment but was reduced later in the follow-up of these glioma patients. Nelson <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr></abbrgrp> reported that the intensity of the tCho, Cr, and NAA signal decreased with time after radiation treatment of gliomas, and the lactate/lipid ratio increased to a maximum four months after the end of radiation. This is interpreted to represent a reduction in tumor and formation of treatment-induced necrosis. Possibly, the changes observed in the present study of brain metastases could be caused by the same mechanisms.</p>
			<p>Single voxel spectroscopy has been extensively used in examination of brain tumors <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr></abbrgrp> and has been included in routine MRI protocols for tumor diagnostics at several sites. Differentiation of most tumor types has been successfully reported and a clinical decision support system for classification of brain tumors, INTERPRET, has recently been developed <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr></abbrgrp>. The short acquisition time makes it simple to include it in a clinical MRI exam and the 3T generation of MR instruments will give better spectral resolution and signal-to-noise ratio with equal effective size of VOI <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr></abbrgrp>. The spatial resolution will, however, be poor compared to MR Spectroscopic Imaging (MRSI). Using MRSI, several single voxels over a wider area become examined at the same time and metabolite distribution in both tumor and surrounding normal tissue are explored. However, single voxel MRS is less time consuming both during optimization and acquisition than MRSI. The signal from the whole metastasis was used for studying the metabolic phenotype in these analyses.</p>
			<p>The exclusion criterion used in this study was the mean FWHM value for the corresponding unsuppressed water signal of the obtained spectra. This threshold value should not be considered as an exact threshold normative for other studies due to the small group investigated. However, the method of excluding spectra that are outside the 99% confidence interval of the data could be a used as a standardized quality control. The exclusion criterion excluded five of the enrolled twenty-six patients. Due to their bad health condition, some of the patients where uncomfortable during the examination which could cause motion artefacts, while in three of the patients the metastases were localized near the skull or close to cerebellum. The use of contrast agent has shown no significant effect on metabolite signal intensities at 1.5T <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr></abbrgrp>. The effect of the contrast agent has not been tested in this study. However, for clinical MRS studies of brain metastases in vivo the contrast agent will always be present as a part of the routine MRI protocol.</p>
			<p>Spectrum quality also depends on the voxel size. The spectral SNR increases linearly with the voxel size and with the square root of the number of acquisitions <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr></abbrgrp>. To obtain maximum SNR within acceptable examination time, the number of acquisitions used was chosen as many as possible, resulting in 192 acquisitions during a seven minutes examination. In about half of the patient group, the smallest possible voxel size was used due to the size of the metastasis. Hence, these cases should give reduced SNR compared to the other cases where the cubic sides where 15 mm. Among the excluded spectra two out of five where obtained using the largest volume size.</p>
			<p>A clear limitation of the present study is the small and heterogeneous group of patients and increased number of patients to further validate the clinical value of the PLS model is necessary. A possible bias could be the skewed distribution of the subgroups of brain metastases. There were twice as many patients with brain metastases from breast and lung cancer as the other groups. This reflects however the incidence of brain metastases from the different type of primary cancer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Conclusion</p>
			</st>
			<p>The in vivo metabolic MR profiles of brain metastases demonstrated variations due to origin of primary cancer and as an effect of radiation treatment. A correlation between MR profiles and survival at five months was also found. Thus, MR determined metabolic profiles might contain valuable clinical information for planning and evaluation of brain metastasis treatment.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Competing interests</p>
			</st>
			<p>The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Authors' contributions</p>
			</st>
			<p>The study was conceived by ISG, SL and US while all authors contributed to the design of it. SL and RJ included the patients and provided the clinical information. TES organized the MRS examinations, performed the data analyses and wrote the paper. KAK were responsible for the MRI and MRS examinations. TFB contributed with multivariate analyses and discussions. All authors discussed, read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
		</sec>
	</bdy>
	<bm>
		<ack>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Acknowledgements</p>
				</st>
				<p>This work was supported by a grant from Central Norway Regional Health Authority. Thanks to the radiographs at Department of Radiology, St. Olavs University Hospital, for great technical assistance during the MRI/MRS examinations.</p>
			</sec>
		</ack>
		<refgrp>
			<bibl id="B1">
				<title>
					<p>Metastatic brain tumors</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Sawaya</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bindal</snm>
						<fnm>RK</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lang</snm>
						<fnm>FF</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Abi-Said</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Brain Tumors An encyclopedic approach</source>
				<publisher>London: Harcourt Publishers Limited</publisher>
				<editor>Kaye AH, Laws ER Jr</editor>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<fpage>999</fpage>
				<lpage>1026</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B2">
				<title>
					<p>Incidence proportions of brain metastases in patients diagnosed (1973 to 2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Barnholtz-Sloan</snm>
						<fnm>JS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sloan</snm>
						<fnm>AE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Davis</snm>
						<fnm>FG</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Vigneau</snm>
						<fnm>FD</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lai</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sawaya</snm>
						<fnm>RE</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Clin Oncol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>22</volume>
				<fpage>2865</fpage>
				<lpage>2872</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1200/JCO.2004.12.149</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15254054</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B3">
				<title>
					<p>Validation of the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification for brain metastases</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Gaspar</snm>
						<fnm>LE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Scott</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Murray</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Curran</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>47</volume>
				<fpage>1001</fpage>
				<lpage>1006</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00547-2</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10863071</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B4">
				<title>
					<p>Therapeutic management of brain metastasis</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Kaal</snm>
						<fnm>EC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Niel</snm>
						<fnm>CG</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Vecht</snm>
						<fnm>CJ</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Lancet Neurol</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>4</volume>
				<fpage>289</fpage>
				<lpage>298</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70072-7</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15847842</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B5">
				<title>
					<p>The management of brain metastases</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Patchell</snm>
						<fnm>RA</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Cancer Treat Rev</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>29</volume>
				<fpage>533</fpage>
				<lpage>540</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0305-7372(03)00105-1</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14585263</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B6">
				<title>
					<p>Single brain metastases from unknown primary malignancies in CT-era</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Salvati</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cervoni</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Raco</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Neurooncol</source>
				<pubdate>1995</pubdate>
				<volume>23</volume>
				<fpage>75</fpage>
				<lpage>80</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF01058462</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">7623072</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B7">
				<title>
					<p>Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in clinical oncology</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Golder</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Onkologie</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>27</volume>
				<fpage>304</fpage>
				<lpage>309</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1159/000077983</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15249722</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B8">
				<title>
					<p>Metabolic profiles of human brain tumors using quantitative in vivo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Howe</snm>
						<fnm>FA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Barton</snm>
						<fnm>SJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cudlip</snm>
						<fnm>SA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Stubbs</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Saunders</snm>
						<fnm>DE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Murphy</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wilkins</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Opstad</snm>
						<fnm>KS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Doyle</snm>
						<fnm>VL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>McLean</snm>
						<fnm>MA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bell</snm>
						<fnm>BA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Griffiths</snm>
						<fnm>JR</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Magn Reson Med</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>49</volume>
				<fpage>223</fpage>
				<lpage>232</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/mrm.10367</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12541241</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B9">
				<title>
					<p>Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients with glial tumors: a multicenter study</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Negendank</snm>
						<fnm>WG</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sauter</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Brown</snm>
						<fnm>TR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Evelhoch</snm>
						<fnm>JL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Falini</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gotsis</snm>
						<fnm>ED</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Heerschap</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kamada</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lee</snm>
						<fnm>BC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mengeot</snm>
						<fnm>MM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Moser</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Padavic-Shaller</snm>
						<fnm>KA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sanders</snm>
						<fnm>JA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Spraggins</snm>
						<fnm>TA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Stillman</snm>
						<fnm>AE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Terwey</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Vogl</snm>
						<fnm>TJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wicklow</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zimmerman</snm>
						<fnm>RA</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Neurosurg</source>
				<pubdate>1996</pubdate>
				<volume>84</volume>
				<fpage>449</fpage>
				<lpage>458</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">8609557</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B10">
				<title>
					<p>Single-voxel proton MRS of the human brain at 1.5T and 3.0T</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Barker</snm>
						<fnm>PB</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hearshen</snm>
						<fnm>DO</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Boska</snm>
						<fnm>MD</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Magn Reson Med</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>45</volume>
				<fpage>765</fpage>
				<lpage>769</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/mrm.1104</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11323802</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B11">
				<title>
					<p>Multivoxel 3D proton spectroscopy in the brain at 1.5 versus 3.0 T: signal-to-noise ratio and resolution comparison</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Gonen</snm>
						<fnm>O</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gruber</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Li</snm>
						<fnm>BS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mlynarik</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Moser</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Am J Neuroradiol</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>22</volume>
				<fpage>1727</fpage>
				<lpage>1731</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11673168</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B12">
				<title>
					<p>Clinical 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of brain metastases at 1.5T and 3T</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Sjobakk</snm>
						<fnm>TE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lundgren</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kristoffersen</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Singstad</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Svarliaunet</snm>
						<fnm>AJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sonnewald</snm>
						<fnm>U</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gribbestad</snm>
						<fnm>IS</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Acta Radiol</source>
				<pubdate>2006</pubdate>
				<volume>47</volume>
				<fpage>501</fpage>
				<lpage>508</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">16796315</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B13">
				<title>
					<p>Localized proton NMR spectroscopy of brain tumors using short-echo time STEAM sequences</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Frahm</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bruhn</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hanicke</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Merboldt</snm>
						<fnm>KD</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mursch</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Markakis</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Comput Assist Tomogr</source>
				<pubdate>1991</pubdate>
				<volume>15</volume>
				<fpage>915</fpage>
				<lpage>922</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/00004728-199111000-00002</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">1939768</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B14">
				<title>
					<p>Multivoxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy of brain tumors</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Nelson</snm>
						<fnm>SJ</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Mol Cancer Ther</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>2</volume>
				<fpage>497</fpage>
				<lpage>507</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12748312</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B15">
				<title>
					<p>Hydrogen magnetic resonance spectroscopy follow-up after radiation therapy of human brain cancer. Unexpected inverse correlation between the changes in tumor choline level and post-gadolinium magnetic resonance imaging contrast</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Sijens</snm>
						<fnm>PE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Vecht</snm>
						<fnm>CJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Levendag</snm>
						<fnm>PC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>van</snm>
						<fnm>DP</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Oudkerk</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Invest Radiol</source>
				<pubdate>1995</pubdate>
				<volume>30</volume>
				<fpage>738</fpage>
				<lpage>744</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/00004424-199512000-00008</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">8748188</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B16">
				<title>
					<p>Differentiation between brain tumor recurrence and radiation injury using MR spectroscopy</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Weybright</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sundgren</snm>
						<fnm>PC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Maly</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hassan</snm>
						<fnm>DG</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nan</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rohrer</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Junck</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>AJR Am J Roentgenol</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>185</volume>
				<fpage>1471</fpage>
				<lpage>1476</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.2214/AJR.04.0933</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16304000</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B17">
				<title>
					<p>Identification of MRI and 1H MRSI parameters that may predict survival for patients with malignant gliomas</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Li</snm>
						<fnm>X</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Jin</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lu</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Oh</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Chang</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nelson</snm>
						<fnm>SJ</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>NMR Biomed</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>17</volume>
				<fpage>10</fpage>
				<lpage>20</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/nbm.858</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15011246</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B18">
				<title>
					<p>Java-based graphical user interface for MRUI, a software package for quantitation of in vivo/medical magnetic resonance spectroscopy signals</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Naressi</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Couturier</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Castang</snm>
						<fnm>I</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>de Beer</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Graveron-Demilly</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Comput Biol Med</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>31</volume>
				<fpage>269</fpage>
				<lpage>286</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0010-4825(01)00006-3</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11334636</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B19">
				<title>
					<p>Computer aided design of experiments</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Kennard</snm>
						<fnm>RW</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Stone</snm>
						<fnm>LA</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Techometrics</source>
				<pubdate>1969</pubdate>
				<volume>11</volume>
				<fpage>137</fpage>
				<lpage>148</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/1266770</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B20">
				<title>
					<p>The relationship between nuclear magnetic resonance-visible lipids, lipid droplets, and cell proliferation in cultured C6 cells</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Barba</snm>
						<fnm>I</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cabanas</snm>
						<fnm>ME</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Arus</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Cancer Res</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<volume>59</volume>
				<fpage>1861</fpage>
				<lpage>1868</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10213493</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B21">
				<title>
					<p>1H NMR visible lipids in the life and death of cells</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Hakumaki</snm>
						<fnm>JM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kauppinen</snm>
						<fnm>RA</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Trends Biochem Sci</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>25</volume>
				<fpage>357</fpage>
				<lpage>362</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0968-0004(00)01614-5</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10916153</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B22">
				<title>
					<p>Differentiation of metastases from high-grade gliomas using short echo time 1H spectroscopy</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Opstad</snm>
						<fnm>KS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Murphy</snm>
						<fnm>MM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wilkins</snm>
						<fnm>PR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bell</snm>
						<fnm>BA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Griffiths</snm>
						<fnm>JR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Howe</snm>
						<fnm>FA</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Magn Reson Imaging</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>20</volume>
				<fpage>187</fpage>
				<lpage>192</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/jmri.20093</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15269942</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B23">
				<title>
					<p>A systematic literature review of magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the characterization of brain tumors</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Hollingworth</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Medina</snm>
						<fnm>LS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lenkinski</snm>
						<fnm>RE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shibata</snm>
						<fnm>DK</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bernal</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zurakowski</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Comstock</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Jarvik</snm>
						<fnm>JG</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</source>
				<pubdate>2006</pubdate>
				<volume>27</volume>
				<fpage>1404</fpage>
				<lpage>1411</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16908548</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B24">
				<title>
					<p>Differentiation between high-grade glioma and metastatic brain tumor using single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Ishimaru</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Morikawa</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Iwanaga</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kaminogo</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ochi</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hayashi</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Eur Radiol</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>11</volume>
				<fpage>1784</fpage>
				<lpage>1791</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s003300000814</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11511902</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B25">
				<title>
					<p>Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H MRS) of human brain tumours: assessment of differences between tumour types and its applicability in brain tumour categorization</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Majos</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Alonso</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Aguilera</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Serrallonga</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Perez-Martin</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Acebes</snm>
						<fnm>JJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Arus</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gili</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Eur Radiol</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>13</volume>
				<fpage>582</fpage>
				<lpage>591</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12594562</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B26">
				<title>
					<p>Brain tumor classification by proton MR spectroscopy: comparison of diagnostic accuracy at short and long TE</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Majos</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Julia-Sape</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Alonso</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Serrallonga</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Aguilera</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Acebes</snm>
						<fnm>JJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Arus</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gili</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>25</volume>
				<fpage>1696</fpage>
				<lpage>1704</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15569733</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B27">
				<title>
					<p>Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of brain tumors: an in vitro study</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Kinoshita</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kajiwara</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yokota</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Koga</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Neurosurgery</source>
				<pubdate>1994</pubdate>
				<volume>35</volume>
				<fpage>606</fpage>
				<lpage>613</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/00006123-199410000-00005</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">7808603</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B28">
				<title>
					<p>Brain tumor classification based on long echo proton MRS signals</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Lukas</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Devos</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Suykens</snm>
						<fnm>JA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Vanhamme</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Howe</snm>
						<fnm>FA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Majos</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Moreno-Torres</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>van der</snm>
						<fnm>GM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Tate</snm>
						<fnm>AR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Arus</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Van Huffel</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Artif Intell Med</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>31</volume>
				<fpage>73</fpage>
				<lpage>89</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.artmed.2004.01.001</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15182848</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B29">
				<title>
					<p>Cerebral metabolite differences in adolescents with low birth weight: assessment with in vivo proton MR spectroscopy</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Bathen</snm>
						<fnm>TF</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sjobakk</snm>
						<fnm>TE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Skranes</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Brubakk</snm>
						<fnm>AM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Vik</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Martinussen</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Myhr</snm>
						<fnm>GE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gribbestad</snm>
						<fnm>IS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Axelson</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Pediatr Radiol</source>
				<pubdate>2006</pubdate>
				<volume>36</volume>
				<fpage>802</fpage>
				<lpage>809</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00247-006-0159-5</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16703344</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B30">
				<title>
					<p>Serial proton MR spectroscopic imaging of recurrent malignant gliomas after gamma knife radiosurgery</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Graves</snm>
						<fnm>EE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nelson</snm>
						<fnm>SJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Vigneron</snm>
						<fnm>DB</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Verhey</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>McDermott</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Larson</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Chang</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Prados</snm>
						<fnm>MD</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Dillon</snm>
						<fnm>WP</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>22</volume>
				<fpage>613</fpage>
				<lpage>624</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11290467</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B31">
				<title>
					<p>In vivo molecular imaging for planning radiation therapy of gliomas: an application of 1H MRSI</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Nelson</snm>
						<fnm>SJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Graves</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Pirzkall</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Li</snm>
						<fnm>X</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Antiniw</snm>
						<fnm>CA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Vigneron</snm>
						<fnm>DB</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>McKnight</snm>
						<fnm>TR</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Magn Reson Imaging</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>16</volume>
				<fpage>464</fpage>
				<lpage>476</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/jmri.10183</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12353260</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B32">
				<title>
					<p>Development of a decision support system for diagnosis and grading of brain tumours using in vivo magnetic resonance single voxel spectra</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Tate</snm>
						<fnm>AR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Underwood</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Acosta</snm>
						<fnm>DM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Julia-Sape</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Majos</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Moreno-Torres</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Howe</snm>
						<fnm>FA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>van der</snm>
						<fnm>GM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lefournier</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Murphy</snm>
						<fnm>MM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Loosemore</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ladroue</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wesseling</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Luc</snm>
						<fnm>BJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cabanas</snm>
						<fnm>ME</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Simonetti</snm>
						<fnm>AW</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gajewicz</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Calvar</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Capdevila</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wilkins</snm>
						<fnm>PR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bell</snm>
						<fnm>BA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Remy</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Heerschap</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Watson</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Griffiths</snm>
						<fnm>JR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Arus</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>NMR Biomed</source>
				<pubdate>2006</pubdate>
				<volume>19</volume>
				<fpage>411</fpage>
				<lpage>434</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/nbm.1016</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16763971</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B33">
				<title>
					<p>1H MR spectroscopy monitoring of changes in choline peak area and line shape after Gd-contrast administration</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Sijens</snm>
						<fnm>PE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Oudkerk</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>van Dijk</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Levendag</snm>
						<fnm>PC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Vecht</snm>
						<fnm>CJ</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Magn Reson Imaging</source>
				<pubdate>1998</pubdate>
				<volume>16</volume>
				<fpage>1273</fpage>
				<lpage>1280</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0730-725X(98)00143-X</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9858285</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B34">
				<title>
					<p>Effects of contrast material on single-volume proton MR spectroscopy</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Smith</snm>
						<fnm>JK</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kwock</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Castillo</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>21</volume>
				<fpage>1084</fpage>
				<lpage>1089</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10871019</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B35">
				<title>
					<p>Signal, Contrast and Noise</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Haacke</snm>
						<fnm>EM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Brown</snm>
						<fnm>RW</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Thompson</snm>
						<fnm>MR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Venkatesan</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design</source>
				<publisher>New York: Wiley-Liss</publisher>
				<editor>Haacke EM, Brown RW, Thompson MR, Venkatesan R</editor>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<fpage>331</fpage>
				<lpage>380</lpage>
			</bibl>
		</refgrp>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Pre-publication history</p>
			</st>
			<p>The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:</p>
			<p>
				<url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/7/141/prepub</url>
			</p>
		</sec>
	</bm>
</art>
