<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art><ui>1471-2407-10-89</ui><ji>1471-2407</ji><fm>
<dochead>Research article</dochead>
<bibl>
<title>
<p>Targeting HOX and PBX transcription factors in ovarian cancer</p>
</title>
<aug>
<au ca="yes" id="A1"><snm>Morgan</snm><fnm>Richard</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>r.morgan@surrey.ac.uk</email></au>
<au id="A2"><snm>Plowright</snm><fnm>Lynn</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>lplowrig@sgul.ac.uk</email></au>
<au id="A3"><snm>Harrington</snm><mi>J</mi><fnm>Kevin</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>kevin.harrington@icr.ac.uk</email></au>
<au id="A4"><snm>Michael</snm><fnm>Agnieszka</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>a.michael@surrey.ac.uk</email></au>
<au id="A5"><snm>Pandha</snm><mi>S</mi><fnm>Hardev</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>h.pandha@surrey.ac.uk</email></au>
</aug>
<insg>
<ins id="I1"><p>Postgraduate Medical School, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK</p></ins>
<ins id="I2"><p>Targeted Therapy Team, Chester Beatty Laboratories, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK</p></ins>
</insg>
<source>BMC Cancer</source>
<issn>1471-2407</issn>
<pubdate>2010</pubdate>
<volume>10</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>89</fpage>
<url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/10/89</url>
<xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmpid">20219106</pubid><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2407-10-89</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
</bibl>
<history><rec><date><day>11</day><month>3</month><year>2009</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>10</day><month>3</month><year>2010</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>10</day><month>3</month><year>2010</year></date></pub></history>
<cpyrt><year>2010</year><collab>Morgan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
<abs>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Abstract</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Backgound</p>
</st>
<p>Ovarian cancer still has a relatively poor prognosis due to the frequent occurrence of drug resistance, making the identification of new therapeutic targets an important goal. We have studied the role of <it>HOX </it>genes in the survival and proliferation of ovarian cancer cells. These are a family of homeodomain-containing transcription factors that determine cell and tissue identity in the early embryo, and have an anti-apoptotic role in a number of malignancies including lung and renal cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Methods</p>
</st>
<p>We used QPCR to determine HOX gene expression in normal ovary and in the ovarian cancer cell lines SK-OV3 and OV-90. We used a short peptide, HXR9, to disrupt the formation of HOX/PBX dimers and alter transcriptional regulation by HOX proteins.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results</p>
</st>
<p>In this study we show that the ovarian cancer derived line SK-OV3, but not OV-90, exhibits highly dysregulated expression of members of the <it>HOX </it>gene family. Disrupting the interaction between HOX proteins and their co-factor PBX induces apoptosis in SK-OV3 cells and retards tumour growth <it>in vivo</it>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusion</p>
</st>
<p>HOX/PBX binding is a potential target in ovarian cancer</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</abs>
</fm><bdy>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Background</p>
</st>
<p>Ovarian cancer is a relatively uncommon malignancy, accounting for 4% of all cancers in the western world and 5% of all cancer deaths in women, but the mortality from this disease has improved little in the last 30 years <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Detection of ovarian cancer is often at a relatively advanced stage of the disease due to a lack of specific symptoms, and the overall survival for women diagnosed with stage III or IV ovarian cancer varies from 18.6-46.7%. Treatment is usually a combination of surgery and chemotherapy, frequently using carboplatin, but recurrence and resistance is commonly observed with an associated high mortality in these cases <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>In a similar manner to other cancers, ovarian cancers are known to over express a number of genes involved in early development. These include the <it>HOX </it>genes, a family of homeodomain-containing transcription factors that define the identity of cells and tissues during early development <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. There are 39 <it>HOX </it>genes in mammals, divided into four groups (A-D) in tightly linked clusters on different chromosomes <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Whilst some <it>HOX </it>genes have distinct functions in specific contexts, many others have overlapping or redundant functions during early development <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, in haematological malignancies <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, and in a number of other cancers including melanoma <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and renal cancer <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, where the <it>HOX </it>genes have a potent anti-apoptotic function. This redundancy in HOX function is based in part upon the binding of similar DNA sequences, and also on the interaction of HOX proteins with a common set of co-factors including PBX. PBX modifies the DNA binding specificity of HOX proteins, influences the regulation of transcription, and is required for many aspects of HOX function <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Changes in <it>HOX </it>gene expression have also been observed in ovarian cancer <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Over expression of <it>HOXA9</it>, <it>HOXA10 </it>or <it>HOXA11 </it>results in a serous, endometrioid-like or mucinous-like phenotype respectively <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In addition, <it>HOX </it>genes have been shown to influence the ability of ovarian cancer cells to invade other tissues <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, and to promote tumour growth <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In this study we have addressed whether <it>HOX </it>genes have an anti-apoptotic effect in ovarian cancer. We show that <it>HOX </it>expression in the ovarian cancer cell line SK-OV3 is highly dysregulated compared to normal ovarian tissue. Furthermore, interfering with <it>HOX </it>function using the PBX-binding peptide HXR9 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
</abbrgrp> triggers apoptosis in SK-OV3 cells both <it>in vitro </it>and <it>in vivo</it>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Methods</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Maintenance of SK-OV3 and OV-90 in culture</p>
</st>
<p>The human ovarian adenocarcinoma-derived cell lines SK-OV3 and OV-90 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (LGC Promochem, Teddington, UK). The cells were cultured in McCoy's 5A modified medium (Sigma, Poole, UK) supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum (Invitrogen Ltd, Paisley, UK) and 1% penicillin (10,000 U/ml)/streptomycin (10 mg/ml) (Sigma). Cell cultures were maintained at 37&#176;C in a humidified, 5% CO<sub>2 </sub>incubator.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Semi quantitative PCR</p>
</st>
<p>Total RNA from normal human ovary tissue was purchased from Applied Biosystems (Warrington, UK). RNA was isolated from SK-OV3 and OV-90 cells using the RNeasy<sup>&#174; </sup>Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen Ltd, Crawley, UK) according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was synthesised from RNA using the Cloned AMV First Strand Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's protocol. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR was performed using the Stratagene MX3005P Real Time PCR machine (Agilent Technologies UK Ltd, Stockport, UK) and SYBR<sup>&#174; </sup>Green JumpStart&#8482; Taq ReadyMix&#8482; (Sigma). Oligonucleotide primers were designed to facilitate the unique amplification of <it>&#946;-actin</it>, <it>c-Fos </it>and each <it>HOX </it>gene. Relative expression was calculated using the Livak comparative Ct method (2<sup>-&#916;&#916;Ct</sup>) <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Analysis of cell death and apoptosis</p>
</st>
<p>Cell viability was measured via the MTS assay (Promega, Southampton, UK) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cells were plated in a 96-well plate at a concentration of 1 &#215; 10<sup>5 </sup>cells/ml and incubated for 24 hours. Cells were treated overnight with the active peptide HXR9 or the control peptide CXR9 at a range of dilutions. The IC<sub>50 </sub>of the cells was determined by plotting a dose-response curve. To detect morphological changes consistent with apoptosis, cells were harvested by incubating in trypsin-EDTA (Sigma) at 37&#176;C until detached and dissociated. Apoptotic cells were identified using a Beckman Coulter Epics XL flow cytometer (argon laser, excitation wavelength 488 nm, FL-2 and FL-4 detectors) and the Annexin V-PE apoptosis detection kit (BD Pharmingen).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Imaging of the cells</p>
</st>
<p>For phase contrast micrographs, cells were plated into 60 mm tissue culture dishes at a concentration of 1 &#215; 10<sup>5 </sup>cells/ml and incubated at 37&#176;C for 24 hours. Cells were treated overnight with HXR9 (120 &#956;M) or CXR9 (120 &#956;M). The cells were washed twice with PBS, visualised using a Nikon Eclipse TE100 inverted microscope and images recorded using a Nikon DS-L camera and capture software (Nikon Instruments Europe B.V., Amstelveen, The Netherlands).</p>
<p>For fluorescent images of HXR9 localisation, 35 mm culture dishes were seeded with 2 &#215; 10<sup>5 </sup>cells and incubated as previously described. The cultures were treated with HXR9-FITC conjugate (30 &#956;M) for 1 hour. The cells were fixed with 10% formalin in neutral-buffered saline (Sigma). Cells were visualised using a Nikon Eclipse TE 2000-S fluorescent microscope and images recorded using a DMX 1200F camera and NIS Elements capture software (Nikon Instruments).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Detection of PARP cleavage by western blotting</p>
</st>
<p>SK-OV3 cells were seeded at a concentration of 4 &#215; 10<sup>4 </sup>cells/ml on 60 mm tissue culture dishes and were incubated at 37&#176;C. When cells approached 75% confluence, cultures were treated overnight with HXR9 (120 &#956;M) or CXR9 (120 &#956;M). Lysates were prepared with RIPA buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails and EDTA (Perbio Science UK Ltd, Cramlington, UK). The protein concentration was quantified using the bicinchoninic acid assay (Perbio) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Proteins were resolved by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. Anti-PARP antibody (Biomol International, Exeter, UK) was used to detect both cleaved and full-length PARP. To visualise proteins, the ECL Western blotting detection system (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, UK) was used.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Mice and <it>in vivo </it>trial</p>
</st>
<p>All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the United Kingdom Co-ordinating Committee on Cancer Research (UKCCCR) guidelines for the Welfare of Animals in Experimental Neoplasia <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and approved by the St. George's Hospital Medical School Ethical Review Committee. The mice were kept in positive pressure isolators in 12 hour light/dark cycles and food and water were available <it>ad libitum</it>.</p>
<p>Athymic nude mice were inoculated subcutaneously with a suspension of 2.5 &#215; 10<sup>6 </sup>SK-OV3 cells in culture media (100 &#956;l). Once tumours reached volumes of approximately 100 mm<sup>3</sup>, mice received an initial dose of 100 mg/Kg CXR9 or HXR9 intravenously, with subsequent dosing of 10 mg/Kg twice weekly. Each treatment group contained 10 mice. The mice were monitored carefully for signs of distress, including behavioural changes and weight loss.</p>
<p>An additional 10 mice were included in each treatment group to allow the amount of HXR9 peptide in tumours to be assessed. Tumours were excised from three mice at 3, 12 and 24 hours after iv administration of 100 mg/Kg HXR9. Total cellular protein was extracted and 10 &#956;g were dot blotted on nitrocellulose membrane and probed with a rabbit polyclonal anti-HXR9 antibody. Quantification was achieved using a standard series of HXR9 dilutions.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Statistical analysis</p>
</st>
<p>Data are given as means &#177; SEM of at least three independent experiments. Significant effects were determined by 2-tailed Student's <it>t </it>tests (p &lt; 0.05), or the Mann-Whitney test for mouse tumour modelling experiments. For the analysis of the QPCR for HOX gene expression the Bonferroni correction was applied to account for multiple comparisons. There are 39 HOX genes thus the limit for a significant result is p &lt; 0.0013.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>
<it>Hox </it>gene expression in normal ovarian tissue and ovarian cancer cell lines</p>
</st>
<p>Previous studies have examined the expression of <it>HOX </it>genes in ovarian tumours but to date this had not been done in a comprehensive manner, looking at all 39 members of this family. Thus, we measured the relative expression of <it>HOX </it>genes in normal ovarian tissue and in the derived cell lines SK-OV3 and OV-90 using semi-quantitative PCR (Fig <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). This revealed that multiple <it>HOX </it>genes had a dysregulated pattern of expression in SK-OV3 cells, but generally not in OV-90 cells, in comparison to the normal ovary. In SK-OV3 the A family of the <it>HOX </it>genes showed a statistically significant up regulation of <it>HOXA5, HOXA9</it>, and <it>HOXA13</it>. The <it>HOXB </it>and <it>HOXD </it>families were mainly expressed only in SK-OV3 cells; <it>HOXB5</it>, <it>HOXD9</it>, and <it>HOXD11 </it>showed significantly increased expression.</p>
<fig id="F1"><title><p>Figure 1</p></title><caption><p>HOX gene expression in normal ovary and in the ovarian cancer derived cell lines SK-OV3 and OV-90 cells</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>HOX gene expression in normal ovary and in the ovarian cancer derived cell lines SK-OV3 and OV-90 cells</b>. Gene expression was determined by QPCR and expressed as a ratio to the amount of expression of the housekeeping gene, <it>&#946;-actin</it>. Abbreviations are used for each <it>HOX </it>gene shown on the x-axis such that, for example, <it>HOXA1 </it>is represented by 'A1'. SEM is indicated by the error bars. P-values of less than 0.0013 (Bonferroni correction for multiple hypothesis testing) for expression in SK-OV3 cells compared to that in normal ovary are denoted *.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2407-10-89-1" hint_layout="double"/></fig>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Targeting HOX/PBX dimers in SK-OV3 and OV-90</p>
</st>
<p>Results from previous studies <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
</abbrgrp> together with our data show that many <it>HOX </it>genes are upregulated in ovarian cancer. We therefore decided to study the role of <it>HOX </it>genes in SK-OV3 and OV-90 cells by interfering with HOX function. Previous work has shown that disrupting the interaction between HOX proteins and their PBX co-factor can trigger apoptosis in melanoma and renal cancer cells <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. PBX binding to HOX modifies the selection of DNA binding sites and hence the identity of <it>HOX </it>target genes. A short peptide, HXR9, was previously shown to disrupt the formation of HOX/PBX dimers, alter transcriptional regulation by HOX proteins and thereby induce apoptosis <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. HXR9 contains nine repeated arginine residues to facilitate cellular uptake, probably through endocytosis <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In order to show that HXR9 was able to enter cells, SK-OV3 cultures were incubated with a fluorescently labelled version of the peptide. This indicated that HXR9 was indeed taken up by SK-OV3 cells and tended to accumulate in the nucleus (Fig <figr fid="F2">2</figr>). Furthermore, HXR9 killed SK-OV3 cells with an IC<sub>50 </sub>of approximately 70 &#956;M, although it did not kill OV-90 cells (Fig <figr fid="F3">3a</figr>). Cell death in SK-OV3 cells was accompanied by characteristic changes in cellular morphology (Fig <figr fid="F3">3b</figr>).</p>
<fig id="F2"><title><p>Figure 2</p></title><caption><p>Uptake of fluorescently labelled HXR9 by SK-OV3 cells</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Uptake of fluorescently labelled HXR9 by SK-OV3 cells</b>. Cells were incubated for one hour with an HXR9-FITC conjugate (30 &#956;M) (green). HXR9 is confined to the nucleus in the majority of cells.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2407-10-89-2" hint_layout="single"/></fig>
<fig id="F3"><title><p>Figure 3</p></title><caption><p>(a) HXR9 toxicity was determined using the MTS assay</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>(a) HXR9 toxicity was determined using the MTS assay</b>. SK-OV3 and OV-90 cells were treated overnight with 30, 60, 90 and 120 &#956;M of either CXR9 or HXR9. A sample of the same cell suspension was used as a "cell-only" control. Results here are presented as an average of three independent experiments &#177; SEM. The IC<sub>50 </sub>for SK-OV3 was estimated from the graph to be 70 &#956;M, no value could be determined for OV-90. <b>(b) </b><it>Phase contrast micrographs of SKOV-3 cells treated overnight with 60 &#956;M of HXR9 or CXR9</it>. In HXR9 treated cultures, fewer number of adherent cells were evident and many detached, dead cells were apparent. (&#215;120 magnification)</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2407-10-89-3" hint_layout="single"/></fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>HXR9 treatment causes apoptosis</p>
</st>
<p>Flow cytometric analysis was used to distinguish between apoptotic and necrotic cell death. SK-OV3 cells were stained with Annexin-V-PE to detect the externalisation of phosphatidylserine, which occurs during the early stages of apoptosis. Cells were counterstained with the vital dye 7AAD. When compared with controls, a significantly higher proportion of SK-OV3 cells treated with HXR9 were shown to be in late apoptosis (<it>P </it>&lt; 0.001) but few cells were found to be in the early apoptotic or necrotic state (Fig <figr fid="F4">4</figr>).</p>
<fig id="F4"><title><p>Figure 4</p></title><caption><p>Fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis of Annexin V-PE stained SK-OV3 cells</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis of Annexin V-PE stained SK-OV3 cells</b>. Induction of apoptosis in SK-OV3 cells treated overnight with HXR9 or CXR9 (120 &#956;M) was compared with untreated cells. The results are presented as mean values &#177; SEM of five independent experiments. ** indicates a significant difference between treatment groups, p &lt; 0.001.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2407-10-89-4" hint_layout="double"/></fig>
<p>Further, immunoblotting indicated that there was a reduction in full-length PARP in HXR9-treated SK-OV3 cells (Fig <figr fid="F5">5</figr>); PARP cleavage is another characteristic event of apoptosis <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<fig id="F5"><title><p>Figure 5</p></title><caption><p>PARP cleavage induced by HXR9</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>PARP cleavage induced by HXR9</b>. Lysates of CXR9-treated and HXR9-treated SK-OV3 cells were probed with an anti-PARP antibody. A lysate of etoposide treated HL60 leukaemia cells was included as a positive control. Lane 1 - untreated HL60 cells, Lane 2- etoposide treated HL60 cells, Lane 3 - CXR9 treated SK-OV3 cells, Lane 4 - HXR9 treated SK-OV3 cells. 'PARP' - position of full length PARP protein (116kDa), 'PARP(c)' - position of cleaved PARP (85kDa). Beta-actin is included as a loading control.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2407-10-89-5" hint_layout="single"/></fig>
<p>Previous studies have shown that upregulation of <it>cFos </it>is a key event in HXR9-mediated apoptosis in both melanoma and renal cancer cells <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Semi-quantitative PCR revealed that <it>cFos </it>expression is on average 50 times greater in SK-OV3 cells treated with HXR9 (Fig <figr fid="F6">6</figr>) than in either untreated or CXR9-treated cells, whilst HXR9 treatment of OV-90 cells did not cause a significant increase in cFos expression (Fig <figr fid="F6">6</figr>).</p>
<fig id="F6"><title><p>Figure 6</p></title><caption><p>c-Fos expression is elevated after treatment with HXR9</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>c-Fos expression is elevated after treatment with HXR9</b>. SK-OV3 and OV-90 cells were incubated for 24 hours with 120 &#956;M HXR9 or CXR9 and <it>cFos </it>expression was analysed by RT-QPCR. RNA was also extracted from SK-OV3 tumours excised from mice treated twice weekly with HXR9 (10 mg/Kg)<it>iv</it>, after an initial dose of 100 mg/Kg <it>iv </it>on day 3. Results are presented as a ratio with <it>beta-actin </it>expression (x1000). A very high increase in transcription of <it>c-Fos </it>in HXR9 treated SK-OV3 cells and tumours was observed. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean for three independent experiments (cell lines) or for three tumours (<it>in vivo </it>model).</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2407-10-89-6" hint_layout="single"/></fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>HXR9 retards tumour growth <it>in vivo</it>
</p>
</st>
<p>In order to assess the efficacy of HXR9 <it>in vivo </it>we established a xenograft model of SK-OV3 in nude mice by injecting cells into the flank. When the average tumour volume had reached 100 mm<sup>3 </sup>mice were given an initial dose of HXR9 of 100 mg/Kg <it>iv</it>, followed by twice weekly <it>iv </it>treatments at 10 mg/Kg. Tumour growth in HXR9 treated mice was retarded by 46% at 32 days compared to the control group (Fig <figr fid="F7">7a</figr>). RNA was extracted from tumours at the end of 32 days in order to measure <it>cFos </it>expression by QPCR; <it>cFos </it>was found to be expressed at an 18-fold higher level in tumours from HXR9 treated mice than in tumours from untreated mice (Fig <figr fid="F6">6</figr>).</p>
<fig id="F7"><title><p>Figure 7</p></title><caption><p>(a) HXR9 retards SK-OV3 tumour growth in mice</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>(a) HXR9 retards SK-OV3 tumour growth in mice</b>. Mice were treated twice weekly with HXR9 (10 mg/Kg)<it>iv</it>, after an initial dose of 100 mg/Kg <it>iv </it>when the mean tumour volume reached 100 mm<sup>3</sup>. Error bars represent the SEM for each data point. * indicates a significant difference between treatment groups, p &lt; 0.05 (Mann-Whitney test). <b>(b) </b><it>HXR9 accumulation in SK-OV3 tumours</it>. Tumours were removed from mice at 4 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours after an initial dose of HXR9 at 100 mg/Kg <it>iv </it>and the amount of HXR9 in the tumour tissue was assessed using dot blotting with an anti-HXR9 antibody.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2407-10-89-7" hint_layout="single"/></fig>
<p>The uptake of HXR9 by tumours after the initial dose was measured by excising tumours at 4, 12 and 24 hours and assessing the amount of HXR9 using an anti-HXR9 antibody. This indicated that there is a rapid accumulation of peptide in the first four hours and that the amount of peptide remains stable beyond 24 hours (Fig <figr fid="F7">7b</figr>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Discussion</p>
</st>
<p>It is becoming increasingly apparent that <it>HOX </it>genes are frequently dysregulated in different malignancies <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
</abbrgrp> including renal <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, bladder <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, prostate <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, lung <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and ovarian cancer <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
</abbrgrp> (this study). The exact pattern of <it>HOX </it>expression varies for different malignancies and the significance of this is worthy of further investigation. Possible explanations may lie in the original expression of <it>HOX </it>genes in the embryonic cells, in which case the <it>HOX </it>expression profile would influence the phenotype of each cancer. There is clear evidence for this in ovarian cancer where the expression of <it>HOXA9</it>, <it>HOXA10 </it>or <it>HOXA11 </it>confer a serous, endometrioid-like and mucinous-like phenotype respectively <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. It is also clear that the over-expression of some HOX genes is directly related to the degree of malignancy, for example elevated expression of <it>HOXC8 </it>is correlated with the loss of differentiation of prostate tumours <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, although our data indicate that <it>HOXC8 </it>is actually expressed at a lower level in the ovarian cancer lines SK-OV3 and OV-90 as compared to normal ovarian tissue. In addition, loss of <it>HOXA5 </it>and <it>HOXA9 </it>expression is generally associated with an increased resistance to apoptosis and tumour survival <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, although both of these genes are expressed at relatively high levels in SK-OV3 compared to normal ovarian tissue and OV-90. However, recent studies have shown that <it>HOXA9 </it>expression increases considerably in advanced stages of ovarian cancer, indicating that it may have a different function as the disease progresses <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The other <it>HOX </it>genes that are notably upregulated in SK-OV3 cells (but generally not OV-90 cells) have previously been shown to be upregulated in other cancers, including <it>HOXA13 </it>
<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, <it>HOXB5 </it>
<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, <it>HOXB9 </it>
<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and <it>HOXD</it>9 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>One difficulty in interpreting this data is that, in general, there is a high level of redundancy in <it>HOX </it>function which may mask the contribution of any of these individual genes to a malignant phenotype. Hence a post-translational approach may reveal more about global <it>HOX </it>functions in cancer. The HXR9 peptide blocks the binding of HOX proteins to their PBX co-factor and in doing so alters the way in which they bind to DNA and hence changes the regulation of their target genes <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. HXR9 causes melanoma and renal cancer cells to undergo apoptosis, and here we have shown that the SK-OV3 cell line derived from an ovarian tumour responds in the same way, indicating that the HOX/PBX interaction is a potential target in ovarian cancer therapy. Interestingly, HXR9 does not induce cell death in OV-90 cells that generally do not show dysregulated HOX expression.</p>
<p>The role of <it>HOX </it>genes in early development is highly conserved <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. They may also have a common role in malignant cells, as evidenced by a common sensitivity to HXR9 and in similar transcriptional responses, including the upregulation of <it>cFos</it>. This change in <it>cFos </it>expression was previously shown to be responsible, at least in part, for the induction of apoptosis <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Recent studies have shown that <it>cFos </it>transcriptionally represses the key anti-apoptotic gene <it>c-FLIP(L)</it>, greatly sensitising prostate cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
<abbr bid="B28">28</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusions</p>
</st>
<p>Novel targets are needed in ovarian cancer therapy as the long term survival of patients is poor despite the trial of numerous chemotherapeutic regimes including the current standard of care, carboplatin/paclitaxel <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
<abbr bid="B29">29</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The <it>HOX </it>genes are independent of the targets of current chemotherapeutics (as far as this can be known), and hence targeting the HOX/PBX interaction is a potential alternative or addition to current therapeutics when drug resistance develops.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Competing interests</p>
</st>
<p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Authors' contributions</p>
</st>
<p>All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. The authors made the following contributions to this work: LP conducted lab based experimental work, KJH was involved in experimental design and critique, AM was in charge of sample acquisition and critique, HSP helped to write the manuscript and RM was involved in experimental design and also wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final paper.</p>
</sec>
</bdy><bm>
<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>Carcinoma of the ovary. FIGO 6th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer</p></title><aug><au><snm>Heintz</snm><fnm>AP</fnm></au><au><snm>Odicino</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Maisonneuve</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Quinn</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au><au><snm>Benedet</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au><au><snm>Creasman</snm><fnm>WT</fnm></au><au><snm>Ngan</snm><fnm>HY</fnm></au><au><snm>Pecorelli</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Beller</snm><fnm>U</fnm></au></aug><source>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>95</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><fpage>S161</fpage><lpage>92</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0020-7292(06)60033-7</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17161157</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>Hox genes in time and space during vertebrate body formation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Iimura</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Pourqui&#233;</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au></aug><source>Dev Growth Differ</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>49</volume><fpage>265</fpage><lpage>75</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17501904</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Hox clusters as models for vertebrate genome evolution</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hoegg</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Meyer</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Trends Genet</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>421</fpage><lpage>424</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.tig.2005.06.004</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15967537</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>Hox patterning of the vertebrate rib cage</p></title><aug><au><snm>McIntyre</snm><fnm>DC</fnm></au><au><snm>Rakshit</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Yallowitz</snm><fnm>AR</fnm></au><au><snm>Loken</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Jeannotte</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Capecchi</snm><fnm>MR</fnm></au><au><snm>Wellik</snm><fnm>DM</fnm></au></aug><source>Development</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>134</volume><fpage>2981</fpage><lpage>2989</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1242/dev.007567</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17626057</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>The role of HOX genes in malignant myeloid disease</p></title><aug><au><snm>Eklund</snm><fnm>EA</fnm></au></aug><source>Curr Opin Hematol</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>14</volume><fpage>85</fpage><lpage>89</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/MOH.0b013e32801684b6</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17255784</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>Antagonism of HOX/PBX dimer formation blocks the in vivo proliferation of melanoma</p></title><aug><au><snm>Morgan</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Pirard</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Shears</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Sohal</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Pettengell</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Pandha</snm><fnm>HS</fnm></au></aug><source>Cancer Res</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>67</volume><fpage>5806</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4231</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17575148</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Disrupting the interaction between HOX and PBX causes necrotic and apoptotic cell death in the renal cancer lines CaKi-2 and 769-P</p></title><aug><au><snm>Shears</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Plowright</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Harrington</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Pandha</snm><fnm>HS</fnm></au><au><snm>Morgan</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>J Urol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>180</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>N2196</fpage><lpage>201</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.018</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>Hox cofactors in vertebrate development</p></title><aug><au><snm>Moens</snm><fnm>CB</fnm></au><au><snm>Selleri</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au></aug><source>Dev Biol</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>291</volume><fpage>193</fpage><lpage>206</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.10.032</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16515781</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>Lineage infidelity of epithelial ovarian cancers is controlled by HOX genes that specify regional identity in the reproductive tract</p></title><aug><au><snm>Cheng</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Liu</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Yoshida</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Rosen</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Naora</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Nat Med</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>5</volume><fpage>531</fpage><lpage>7</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nm1230</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>HOXB13 promotes ovarian cancer progression</p></title><aug><au><snm>Miao</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>Z</fnm></au><au><snm>Provencher</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Muir</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Dahiya</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Carney</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Leong</snm><fnm>CO</fnm></au><au><snm>Sgroi</snm><fnm>DC</fnm></au><au><snm>Orsulic</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>104</volume><fpage>17093</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.0707938104</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2040435</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">17942676</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>Suppression of invasive characteristics by antisense introduction of overexpressed HOX genes in ovarian cancer cells</p></title><aug><au><snm>Yamashita</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Tazawa</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Yawei</snm><fnm>Z</fnm></au><au><snm>Katayama</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Kato</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Nishiwaki</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Yokohama</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Ishikawa</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Int J Oncol</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>28</volume><fpage>931</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16525643</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>United Kingdom Co-ordinating Committee on Cancer Research (UKCCCR) guidelines for the welfare of animals in experimental neoplasia (second edition)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Workman</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Twentyman</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Balkwill</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Balmain</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Chaplin</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Double</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Embleton</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Newell</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Raymond</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Stables</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Stephens</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Wallace</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Br J Cancer</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>77</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>10</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>Tumour imaging by means of proteolytic activation of cell-penetrating peptides</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jiang</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Olson</snm><fnm>ES</fnm></au><au><snm>Nguyen</snm><fnm>QT</fnm></au><au><snm>Roy</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Jennings</snm><fnm>PA</fnm></au><au><snm>Tsien</snm><fnm>RY</fnm></au></aug><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>101</volume><fpage>17867</fpage><lpage>72</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.0408191101</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">539314</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">15601762</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase by a proteinase with properties like ICE</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lazebnik</snm><fnm>YA</fnm></au><au><snm>Kaufmann</snm><fnm>SH</fnm></au><au><snm>Desnoyers</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Poirier</snm><fnm>GG</fnm></au><au><snm>Earnshaw</snm><fnm>WC</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>1994</pubdate><volume>371</volume><fpage>346</fpage><lpage>7</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/371346a0</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8090205</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>Expression profiles of 39 HOX genes in normal human adult organs and anaplastic thyroid cancer cell lines by quantitative real-time RT-PCR system</p></title><aug><au><snm>Takahashi</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Hamada</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Murakawa</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Takada</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Tada</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Nogami</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Hayashi</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Nakamori</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Monden</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Miyamoto</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Katoh</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Moriuchi</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>Exp Cell Res</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>293</volume><fpage>144</fpage><lpage>53</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.yexcr.2003.09.024</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14729064</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>Expression of AbdB-type homeobox genes in human tumors</p></title><aug><au><snm>Redline</snm><fnm>RW</fnm></au><au><snm>Hudock</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>MacFee</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Patterson</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Lab Invest</source><pubdate>1994</pubdate><volume>71</volume><fpage>663</fpage><lpage>70</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">7967520</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><title><p>HOX genes in human cancers</p></title><aug><au><snm>Cillo</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Invasion Metastasis</source><pubdate>1994</pubdate><volume>14</volume><fpage>38</fpage><lpage>49</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">7657531</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>Hyperexpression of locus C genes in the HOX network is strongly associated in vivo with human bladder transitional cell carcinomas</p></title><aug><au><snm>Cantile</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Cindolo</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Napodano</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Altieri</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Cillo</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Oncogene</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>22</volume><issue>41</issue><fpage>6462</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/sj.onc.1206808</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14508527</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>Aberrant HOXC expression accompanies the malignant phenotype in human prostate</p></title><aug><au><snm>Miller</snm><fnm>GJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Miller</snm><fnm>HL</fnm></au><au><snm>van Bokhoven</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Lambert</snm><fnm>JR</fnm></au><au><snm>Werahera</snm><fnm>PN</fnm></au><au><snm>Schirripa</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Lucia</snm><fnm>MS</fnm></au><au><snm>Nordeen</snm><fnm>SK</fnm></au></aug><source>Cancer Res</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>63</volume><fpage>5879</fpage><lpage>88</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14522913</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B20"><title><p>Overexpression of the homeobox gene HOXC8 in human prostate cancer correlates with loss of tumor differentiation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Waltregny</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Alami</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Clausse</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>de Leval</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Castronovo</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au></aug><source>Prostate</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>50</volume><fpage>162</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/pros.10045</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11813208</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p>Disordered expression of HOX genes in human non-small cell lung cancer</p></title><aug><au><snm>Abe</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Hamada</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Takahashi</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Tada</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Miyamoto</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Morikawa</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Kondo</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Moriuchi</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>Oncol Rep</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>15</volume><fpage>797</fpage><lpage>802</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16525661</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B22"><title><p>Expression and function of HOXA genes in normal and neoplastic ovarian epithelial cells</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ota</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Klausen</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Salamanca</snm><fnm>MC</fnm></au><au><snm>Woo</snm><fnm>HL</fnm></au><au><snm>Leung</snm><fnm>PC</fnm></au><au><snm>Auersperg</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au></aug><source>Differentiation</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>77</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>162</fpage><lpage>71</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.diff.2008.09.018</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19281776</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B23"><title><p>DNA methylation profiling of ovarian carcinomas and their in vitro models identifies HOXA9, HOXB5, SCGB3A1, and CRABP1 as novel targets</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wu</snm><fnm>Q</fnm></au><au><snm>Lothe</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au><au><snm>Ahlquist</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Silins</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Trop&#233;</snm><fnm>CG</fnm></au><au><snm>Micci</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Nesland</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Suo</snm><fnm>Z</fnm></au><au><snm>Lind</snm><fnm>GE</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Cancer</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>10</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>45</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1476-4598-6-45</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B24"><title><p>Transforming potential of the T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia-associated homeobox genes HOXA13, TLX1, and TLX3</p></title><aug><au><snm>Su</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Drabkin</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Clappier</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Morgado</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Busson</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Romana</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Soulier</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Berger</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Bernard</snm><fnm>OA</fnm></au><au><snm>Lavau</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Genes Chromosomes Cancer</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>45</volume><issue>9</issue><fpage>846</fpage><lpage>55</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/gcc.20348</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16804919</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B25"><title><p>Comprehensive analysis of homeobox genes in Hodgkin lymphoma cell lines identifies dysregulated expression of HOXB9 mediated via ERK5 signaling and BMI1</p></title><aug><au><snm>Nagel</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Burek</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Venturini</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Scherr</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Quentmeier</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Meyer</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Rosenwald</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Drexler</snm><fnm>HG</fnm></au><au><snm>MacLeod</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au></aug><source>Blood</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>109</volume><issue>7</issue><fpage>3015</fpage><lpage>23</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17148583</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B26"><title><p>Expression of homeobox genes in cervical cancer</p></title><aug><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Huang</snm><fnm>CJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Choo</snm><fnm>KB</fnm></au></aug><source>Gynecol Oncol</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>84</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>216</fpage><lpage>21</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/gyno.2001.6498</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11812077</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B27"><title><p>MG-132 sensitizes TRAIL-resistant prostate cancer cells by activating c-Fos/c-Jun heterodimers and repressing c-FLIP(L)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Olumi</snm><fnm>AF</fnm></au></aug><source>Cancer Res</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>67</volume><fpage>2247</fpage><lpage>55</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3793</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17332355</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B28"><title><p>c-Fos as a proapoptotic agent in TRAIL-induced apoptosis in prostate cancer cells</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Yang</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Huang</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Otu</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Libermann</snm><fnm>TA</fnm></au><au><snm>Dewolf</snm><fnm>WC</fnm></au><au><snm>Khosravi-Far</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Olumi</snm><fnm>AF</fnm></au></aug><source>Cancer Res</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>67</volume><fpage>9425</fpage><lpage>34</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1310</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17909052</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B29"><title><p>Emerging drugs for ovarian cancer</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sugiyama</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Konishi</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au></aug><source>Expert Opin Emerg Drugs</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>13</volume><fpage>523</fpage><lpage>36</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1517/14728214.13.3.523</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18764727</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl></refgrp>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Pre-publication history</p>
</st>
<p>The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:</p>
<p>
<url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/10/89/prepub</url>
</p>
</sec>
</bm></art>
