A systematic review of maternal obesity and breastfeeding intention, initiation and duration

1471-2393-7-9 1471-2393 Research article A systematic review of maternal obesity and breastfeeding intention, initiation and duration Amir H Lisa l.amir@latrobe.edu.au Donath Susan susan.donath@mcri.edu.au

Mother & Child Health Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia

Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Australia

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1471-2393 2007 7 1 9 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/7/9 17608952 10.1186/1471-2393-7-9 21 2 2007 04 7 2007 04 7 2007 2007 Amir and Donath; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Breastfeeding behaviour is multifactorial, and a wide range of socio-cultural and physiological variables impact on a woman's decision and ability to breastfeed successfully. An association has been reported between maternal obesity and low breastfeeding rates. This is of public health concern because obesity is rising in women of reproductive age and the apparent association with increased artificial feeding will lead to a greater risk of obesity in children. The aim of this paper is to examine the relationship between maternal overweight and obesity and breastfeeding intention and initiation and duration.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted in January and February 2007, using the following databases: Medline, CINAHL and the Australian Breastfeeding Association's Lactation Resource Centre. Studies which have examined maternal obesity and infant feeding intention, initiation, duration and delayed onset of lactation were tabulated and summarised.

Results

Studies have found that obese women plan to breastfeed for a shorter period than normal weight women and are less likely to initiate breastfeeding. Of the four studies that examined onset of lactation, three reported a significant relationship between obesity and delayed lactogenesis. Fifteen studies, conducted in the USA, Australia, Denmark, Kuwait and Russia, have examined maternal obesity and duration of breastfeeding. The majority of large studies found that obese women breastfed for a shorter duration than normal weight women, even after adjusting for possible confounding factors.

Conclusion

There is evidence from epidemiological studies that overweight and obese women are less likely to breastfeed than normal weight women. The reasons may be biological or they may be psychological, behavioral and/or cultural. We urgently need qualitative studies from women's perspective to help us understand women in this situation and their infant feeding decisions and behaviour.

Background

Infants not breastfed have increased risks of ill-health – both short- (e.g. gastrointestinal infections 1) and long-term (such as diabetes 2). Recent systematic reviews have shown a dose-dependent association between longer duration of breastfeeding and decrease in the risk of overweight in later life 34. Looking at the population impact, it has been estimated that 13,639 cases of obesity (95%CI 7,838, 19,308) could be prevented in England and Wales over 9 years if all infants were breastfed for at least three months 5.

Obesity is an increasing problem globally: populations in poor countries as well as affluent ones are at risk 6. Reports of obesity among pregnant women in the USA range from 18.5% to 38.3%, making it one of the most frequent high-risk obstetric situations 7. A recent Australian study reported that 34% of pregnant women were overweight or obese; overweight/obese women had increased adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, resulting in increased costs of obstetric care 8. The increase in maternal obesity is accelerating, and is associated with socio-economic disadvantage 9. It has been recognised that obesity may track across generations, thus prevention is an urgent priority 10.

In 1992, Rutishauser & Carlin reported a negative relationship between maternal obesity and breastfeeding duration and they stated that this was the first study to investigate the effect of over- rather than under-nutrition on the duration of breastfeeding 11. Since then, a number of studies have found lower rates of breastfeeding in women who are overweight and obese compared to women of normal weight 121314. Some researchers have attributed this to physiological causes, such as delayed lactogenesis ("milk coming in") 15 and lower prolactin response 16. However, as obese women are more likely to belong to subgroups of women with lower rates of breastfeeding than normal weight women, such as lower socioeconomic status 17 and higher depression 18, it is necessary to adjust for these potential confounding factors.

This is an important public health issue as the increasing incidence of maternal obesity and the apparent association with increased artificial feeding of infants will lead to an increasing risk of obesity in children. The aim of this paper is to examine the relationship between maternal overweight and obesity and breastfeeding intention and initiation and duration.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted in January and February 2007 using the key words "(obesity OR BMI) AND (breastf* OR lactation OR lactating)". The following databases were searched (all languages, from the start of the database):

• Medline via PubMed (8 February 2007) 767 items, 24 were relevant;

• CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature) (8 February 2007) 103 items, 11 relevant (1 additional);

• Australian Breastfeeding Association's Lactation Resource Centre database was searched for 'obesity' (21 January 2007); 172 items, 10 relevant (3 additional).

Most of the articles found in the databases were about the relationship between breastfeeding and childhood obesity and were therefore not relevant to this review. All papers related to maternal overweight and obesity and infant feeding were located and included if appropriate. Papers that were case studies, clinical papers or reviews were not included in the tables 19202122232425262728. Research studies were also identified from the reference lists of included articles, and the authors' literature collection was hand-searched (n = 2230; nine additional studies). Papers which had cited the original Rutishauser and Carlin study were identified (n = 6), but no new papers were revealed. The total number of research articles included in this review is 27.

Five papers were excluded as they did not define overweight or obesity (e.g. presented body mass index (BMI, kg/m²) as a continuous variable 29303132 or used vague terms, such as "heavy before becoming pregnant" 33). However, as there were very few studies on women's infant feeding intention and maternal overweight and obesity, a study which examined women's "weight concerns" was included 34 as this information was also relevant. Thus, 22 papers are included in the tables (27 less 5).

Most studies based their evaluation of maternal obesity on the World Health Organization (WHO) definition of obesity 35: normal weight BMI<25, overweight BMI 25 ≤ 30, obese BMI > 30, or the US Institute of Medicine (IOM) definition 36: underweight/normal weight BMI < 26.1, overweight BMI 26.1 – 29.0, obese BMI > 29.0.

The papers have been grouped according to the content of the study and presented in tables alphabetically by the first author. As women's infant feeding intention has been found to be the strongest single predictor of breastfeeding behaviour 37, all studies reporting infant feeding intention and maternal obesity, including those with "vague" definitions, have been included in Table 1 (Included studies on maternal obesity and women's infant feeding intentions).

Table 1

Included studies on maternal obesity and women's infant feeding intentions

Authors, Year of Publication, Country, and Year(s) of Study

Participants

Definitions

Results

Barnes et al, 1997 [34], Bristol, UK, 1991-112

Birth cohort, (Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children) n = 11,907

Multivariate analysis, n = 8431 for 1^stweek and n = 8392 for 4 months

Intention: asked at 32 weeks (4 time periods, 4 options for each)

Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire, including 'shape concern' and 'weight concern' items (> 2 indicated marked concern)

Intention to bf 1 week old infant:

Shape concern normal OR 1.22 (95%CI: 1.10, 1.35)

Weight concern normal OR 1.20 (95%CI, 1.07, 1.35)

Intention to bf infant up to 4 months:

Shape concern normal OR 1.30 (95%CI: 1.19, 1.42)

Weight concern normal OR 1.26 (95%CI: 1.14, 1.40)

Multivariate analysis:

Intention to bf 1 week old infant:

Shape concern normal OR 1.25 (95%CI: 1.09, 1.42)

Weight concern normal NS

Intention to bf infant up to 4 months:

Shape concern normal OR 1.26 (95%CI: 1.13, 1.42)

Weight concern normal OR 1.16 (95%CI: 1.02, 1.32)

(Adjusted for demographic variables, smoking, maternal attitudes to baby)

Foster et al 1996 [41], Manchester, UK, yr of study not stated

Antenatal cohort n = 38

Eating Disorder Examination: Shape Concern (SC).

Body Satisfaction Scale:

General Satisfaction (GS).

Measurement of BMI not mentioned in text

Bf intention and BMI: NS

Shape concern:

Intended to bf median 0.29

Intended to formula feed median 1.05 (i.e. higher concern)

(p = 0.02)

General Satisfaction:

Intended to bf median 38.5

Intended to formula feed median 47.5 (i.e. higher dissatisfaction)

(p = 0.004)

Multivariate analysis: body shape satisfaction independent predictor of infant feeding intention.

(Adjusted for social class, GS, SC and maternal-fetal attachment)

Hilson et al 2004 [42], Cooperstown, NY, USA, 1998

Antenatal cohort Eligibility: intended to bf, singleton infant n = 114

IOM definition of obesity Self-reported height and weight

Planned intention (months, mean, sd)

Underweight/normal weight 9.3 (5.7)

Overweight 9.8 (3.0)

Obese 6.9 (4.6)

(p < 0.05)

Bf = breastfeeding, BMI = body mass index, IOM = Institute of Medicine, NS = not significant

The indicators suggested for monitoring breastfeeding have been described as:

• Initiation (the infant's first intake of breast milk)

• Intensity (the degree of exclusiveness of breast milk as the source of nourishment for the infant) and

• Total duration (the total length of time that an infant receives any breast milk at all 38.

Authorities recommend that breastfeeding initiation is defined as "ever breastfed/ever given breast milk" so that infants who only went to the breast once or only received expressed breast milk are included 38. However, research studies have used a range of definitions, including breastfeeding at hospital discharge 12, breastfeeding at four days 39, feeding in last five feeds in hospital 40. Table 2 (Included studies on maternal obesity and initiation of breastfeeding) includes the studies which have reported breastfeeding initiation (however defined), and the authors' definition when it varies from "ever breastfed". Where the authors have not presented an odds ratio (OR) for breastfeeding initiation we have calculated one using data from their publication (labelled as "our calculation of overweight/obese women not initiating breastfeeding"). These are unadjusted odds ratios as we did not have the data to adjust for potential confounding factors such as income or method of birth. We have not performed a meta-analysis as the definitions of initiation are inconsistent.

Table 2

Included studies on maternal obesity and initiation of breastfeeding

Authors, Year of Publication, Country, and Year(s) of Study

Participants

Definition of obesity

Results

Donath & Amir 2000 [13], Australia, 1992–95

1995 National Health Survey

Children up to years 4 old n = 2612

BMI calculated from self-reported height and weight at time of interview

WHO definition of obesity

% (95% CI)

Underweight 89.0 (85.8, 92.2)

Normal weight 89.2 (87.4, 91.0)

Overweight 86.9 (84.0, 89.9)

Obese 82.3 (77.6, 87.0)

OR* overweight 1.25

OR* obese 1.78

Grjibovski et al 2005 [43], Severodvinsk, Russia, 1999

Antenatal community-based cohort n = 1078

Pre-pregnancy weight defined as under- normal and over-weight based on "doctor's diagnosis" [82]

Underweight 98.3%

Normal 98.7%

Overweight 100.0%

Hilson et al 1997 [12]

Cooperstown, NY, USA, 1992–94

Medical record review Eligibility: intended to bf (= bf at birth), healthy singleton infant n = 1109

IOM definition of obesity

BMI calculated from pre-pregnancy weight and height

Quit bf by hospital discharge 2 d after birth:

Normal 4.3%

Overweight 8.9%

Obese 12.2%

OR* overweight 2.17

OR* obese 3.09

Not bf at discharge (of women who attempted bf at birth): Odds Ratio

Overweight 2.54 (p < 0.05)

Obese 3.65 (p = 0.0007)

Hilson et al 2006 [39] Cooperstown, NY, USA, 1988–97

Expanded previous review of medical records [12]

Eligibility: intended to bf (= bf at birth), singleton infant, no contraindications to bf, no diabetes n = 2783

IOM definition of obesity

BMI calculated from pre-pregnancy weight and height

Breastfeeding at 4 days:

Underweight 89.0%

Normal 90.1%

Overweight 88.4%

Obese 82.58%

Obese women different from underweight and normal

weight women

OR* overweight 1.19

OR* obese 1.92

Kugyelka et al 2004 [40] upstate New York, 1999–2000

Medical record review, including paediatric record to 6 months of age, all women of 'Hispanic ethnicity' (n = 235) or 'Black race' (n = 263) Eligibility: healthy mothers (BMI > 19) with healthy single, term infant, who attempted to breastfed

IOM definition

BMI calculated from pre-pregnancy weight and height

Baby put to breast < 2 h:

Hispanic women: Black women

Normal 71.8% 75.1%

Overweight 66.7% 69.2%

Obese 61.5% 63.8%

(p < 0.05) (p < 0.05)

Fed formula only during last 5 feeds in hospital:

Hispanic women: Black women:

Normal weight 9.6% 5.1%

Overweight 12.2% 8.0%

Obese 12.4% 6.9%

Hispanic women

OR* overweight 1.48

OR* obese 1.50

Black women

OR* overweight 1.62

OR* obese 1.38

Multivariate analysis:

Hispanic women: obese OR 1.92 (95% CI 1.20, 3.08) of formula and breast in last 5 feeds before discharge compared to breast only

(adjusted for maternal age, education, parity, gestation, birth wt, smoking and birth)

Other groups

Li et al 2002 [83] USA, 1988–1994

The Third National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHANES III), children aged 2 mo to 6 yrs n = 8765 94% response for these children; 99% data of bf available

BMI calculated from self-reported ht and wt at time of interview.

WHO definition of obesity

Ever breastfed:

Normal 58.1%

Overweight 46.4%

Obese 44.8%

OR* overweight 1.60

OR* obese 1.71

Li et al 2003 [49] USA, 1996–98

Pediatric Nutrition Surveillance System and the Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System, children aged < 5 years n = 51,329

BMI calculated from self-reported pre-pregnancy wt IOM definition of obesity

Obese women more likely to never breastfeed (p < 0.01)

OR 1.28 estimated from Figure 1

Oddy et al 2006 [44] Australia, 1989–1991

Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort Study.

Pregnant women recruited from King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA n = 1803

BMI calculated from pre-pregnancy weight and height (measured by research midwives)

WHO definition of obesity

Never breastfed:

Normal weight 8.2%

Overweight 11.4%

Obese women 12.4%

OR* overweight 1.33

OR* obese 1.47

Scott et al 2006 [45] Australia, 2002–2003

2^ndPerth Infant Feeding Study, cohort of women recruited in hospital. n = 587

Measurement of maternal weight and height not reported

WHO definition of obesity

Any breastfeeding at hospital discharge:

Normal weight 95.6%

Overweight 91.5%

Obese 90.7%

OR 0.45 (95% CI 0.19, 1.09)

OR* overweight 2.02

OR* obese 2.23

Exclusive breastfeeding at hospital discharge:

Multivariate analysis, Adjusted OR (95% CI):

Normal weight 1 (ref)

Overweight 0.50 (0.28, 0.89)

Obese 0.63 (0.33, 1.20)

(adjusted for maternal age, smoking, marital status, occupation, country of birth, parity, antenatal classes, timing of infant feeding decision, delivery, birth weight, special care nursery, mothers' infant feeding attitude, fathers' infant feeding preference, grandmothers' infant feeding preference, whether grandmother had bf)

OR* overweight 2.00

OR* obese 1.59

Sebire et al 2001 [14] UK, 1989–1997

St Mary's Maternity Information system database, North West Thames region n = 325,395

BMI calculated from weight at antenatal booking

Normal BMI 20-<25

Moderately obese 25-<30

Very obese BMI > 30

(BMI < 20 = underweight - excluded from study)

Bf at hospital discharge:

Multivariate analysis, Adjusted OR (99% CI):

Normal weight 1 (ref)

Mod obese 0.86 (0.84, 0.88)

Very obese 0.58 (0.56, 0.60)

(adjusted for ethnic group, parity, age, history of hypertension, diabetes)

OR* overweight 1.16

OR* obese 1.72

bf = breastfed, BMI = body mass index, ht = height, IOM = Institute of Medicine, mo = month, NS = not significant, OR* = our calculation of overweight and obese women not initiating bf compared with normal weight women, WHO = World Health Organization, wk = week, wt = weight

It has been hypothesised that the onset of lactation occurs later in obese women than other women, therefore all studies which have investigated this are listed in Table 3 (Included studies on maternal obesity and delayed onset of lactation).

Table 3

Included studies on maternal obesity and delayed onset of lactation

Authors, Year of Publication, Country, and Year(s) of Study

Participants

Definition of obesity

Results

Chapman & Perez-Escamilla 1999 [15] USA 1996–1997

Hartford Hospital, Connecticut Healthy, single, term infant n = 192

Women's bodies were classified as slim, average, heavy or obese

Delayed lactogenesis (> 72 hours)

Slim/average build 26.4%

Heavy/obese build 52.2%

Multivariate analysis

Heavy/obese build OR 3.2 (95 CI% 1.5, 6.7)

(adjusted for birth weight, method of birth, ethnicity, serious medical condition, parity, formula feeding day 2)

Chapman & Perez-Escamilla 2000 [46] USA 1997–1998

Connecticut Healthy mothers with a healthy, single, term infant n = 57

Definition of obesity: at least 2 of 3:

1. BMI at 72 h > 30,

2. subscapular skin fold thickness at 72 h > 33.7 mm (> 85%ile)

3. heavy/obese build on day 1.

Multivariate analysis

Onset -Milk transfer at 60 h (< or > 9.2 g/feed)

Obese: OR 6.14 (95%CI: 1.10, 37.41, p = 0.05) compared to non-obese

Onset – Maternal perception (< or > 72 h)

Obese: OR 1.97 (95%CI: 0.29, 13.41, p = 0.49) compared to non-obese

Non-obese:

Women who bf more frequently had higher milk transfer values and earlier onset of lactogenesis, than women who bf less frequently

Obese:

No relationship between these variables

Dewey et al 2003 [47] USA 1999

Davis, California Healthy, single, term infants, planning to bf > 1 m n = 280

BMI measured 2 weeks postpartum BMI > 27.0 taken as overweight/obese

Delayed lactogenesis (> 72 hours)

Normal 16%

Overweight/obese 33%

p < 0.05

Multivariate analysis for delayed lactogenesis:

Overweight/obese: RR 2.46 (95%CI: 1.45, 3.64)

(adjusted for C-section, parity, flat nipples, birth weight):

Multivariate analysis for suboptimal infant feeding behaviour on day 7:

Overweight/obese: RR 2.58 (95%CI: 1.07, 5.22).

Hilson et al 2004 [42] USA 1998

Bassett Hospital, Cooperstown, NY Intended to bf, singleton infant n = 114

BMI calculated from pre-pregnancy weight and height

IOM definition of obesity

Delayed lactogenesis (> 72 hours)

Normal 18.5%

Overweight 30.8%

Obese 33.3%

Univariate analysis NS

Multivariate analysis NS {not enough power to show a difference}

Rasmussen et al 2004 [16] USA Years of study not stated

Bassett Healthcare, Cooperstown, NY n = 40

Pre-pregnancy BMI from medical records

IOM definition of obesity

Duration of feed at 7 days postpartum:

Overweight/obese women: infants fed for longer: 23.2 (sd 5.6) mins, compared to 15.3 (sd 6.1) mins for normal weight women (p < 0.005)

Prolactin response to suckling (ng/ml):

48 hours

Normal women 26.0 (sd 61.5)

Overweight/obese women -10.3 (sd 28.3)

p < 0.05

Prolactin response to suckling (ng/ml):

7 days

Normal women 80.9 (sd 67.6)

Overweight/obese women 57.1 (sd 60.2)

Other hormones (insulin, estradiol, progesterone): NS difference between groups. However, insulin levels were 44% higher in overweight/obese women at 7 days (non-fasting levels and inadequate power).

Path analysis: effect of pre-pregnant BMI on prolactin response at 7 days: -30.9 ng/ml.

The final table (Table 4. Included studies on maternal obesity and duration of breastfeeding) includes studies which report total duration of breastfeeding and, where reported, exclusive breastfeeding; multivariate analysis has been included when this has been conducted.

Table 4

Included studies on maternal obesity and duration of breastfeeding

Authors, Year of Publication, Country, and Year(s) of Study

Participants

Definition of obesity

Results

Amine et al 1989 [51] Kuwait, Year of study not given

Multistage, stratified sample, mothers of children < 3 years old n = 2833

Height and weight recorded at interview Results expressed as % of reference standard weight for height (Nutrition Institute in Cairo, Egypt)

Mean duration of breastfeeding (month):

Weight as % reference median:

80% 4.48 (sd 2.3)

85–119% 5.46 (sd 3.1)

120% 6.36 (sd 3.6)

Baker 2004 [50] Denmark, 1996 onwards

National Birth Cohort Excluded infants <2500 g, <37w gestation, illnesses or conditions expected to negatively affect growth, mother <18y, never breastfeed, mother diabetic n = 3768

BMI calculated from pre-pregnant weight and height

WHO definition of obesity

Full breastfeeding

Underweight 15.5 wk

Normal weight 16.3 wk

Overweight 15.6 wk

Obese 14.9 wk

Any breastfeeding

Underweight 29.5 wk

Normal weight 31.3 wk

Overweight 29.2 wk

Obese 27.3 wk

Chapman & Perez-Escamilla 2000 [46] USA, 1997–1998

Connecticut Healthy mothers with a healthy, single, term infant, Caesarean section n = 57

Definition of obesity: at least 2 of 3:

1. BMI at 72 h > 30,

2. subscapular skin fold thickness at 72 h > 33.7 mm (> 85%ile)

3. heavy/obese build on day 1

Multivariate analysis, likelihood of not bf:

Non-obese: OR 2.28 (95%CI: 1.02, 5.11) compared with obese women

(adjusted for maternal intention, milk transfer and other variables, Table 3, model 1)

{Sample too small for multivariate analysis}

Donath & Amir 2000 [13] Australia, 1992–1995

National Health Survey, 1995 Children up to 4 years old Multivariate analysis: n = 1991

BMI calculated at time of interview

WHO definition of obesity

Mean duration % (95% CI)

Normal 28.7 (27.7, 29.8)

Overweight 26.1 (24.3, 28.0)

Obese 22.7 (20.1, 25.2)

Multivariate analysis

Normal 1

Overweight 1.15 (1.01, 1.31)

Obese 1.36 (1.15, 1.61)

p < 0.05

(adjusted for maternal education, marital status, low income, home ownership)

Forster et al 2006 [48] Australia, 1999–2001

Cohort of public patients, Melbourne n = 764

BMI calculated from self-reported height and weight

WHO definition of obesity

Any breastfeeding at 6 months:

Underweight 60.0%

Normal 57.0%

Overweight 51.9%

Obese 37.2%

Multivariate analysis: OR (95% CI)

Underweight 1.15 (0.70, 1.88)

Normal 1

Overweight 0.70 (0.43, 1.12)

Obese 0.49 (0.28, 0.85)

(adjusted for intention, breastfed as a baby, maternal age, smoking, region of birth, attended childbirth education, had formula in hospital, maternal anxiety/depression)

Grjibovski et al 2005 [43] Russia, 1999

Community-based cohort, all pregnant women at antenatal clinics, Severodvinsk n = 1078

Pre-pregnancy weight

Defined as under-, normal and over-weight based on "doctor's diagnosis" [82]

Median duration (months, 25th, 75 ^th percentile):

Underweight 5.50 (3.00, 12.00)

Normal 5.00 (3.00, 9.00)

Overweight 4.25 (2.00, 8.00)

Multivariate analysis NS

Hilson et al 1997 [12] USA, 1992–1994

Medical record review. Bassett Hospital, Cooperstown, NY Healthy singleton infant n = 1109

BMI calculated from pre-pregnancy weight and height

IOM definition of obesity

Exclusive breastfeeding:

Proportional hazards regression:

Overweight RR 1.42, p < 0.04

Obese 1.43, p < 0.02

Any breastfeeding:

Proportional hazards regression:

Overweight RR 1.68, p < 0.006

Obese 1.73, p < 0.001

(adjusted for maternal age, smoking, education, gestation, WIC, parity, birth weight, C. section, diabetes)

Hilson et al 2004 [42] USA, 1998

Bassett Hospital, Cooperstown, NY

Intended to bf, singleton infant. n = 114

BMI calculated from pre-pregnancy weight and height

IOM definition of obesity

Exclusive breastfeeding (wks, mean, sd)

Underweight/normal 3.6 (3.9)

Overweight 2.6 (3.2)

Obese 2.7 (2.3)

Any breastfeeding (wks, mean, sd)

Underweight/normal 7.3 (8.9)

Overweight 5.6 (5.4)

Obese 4.6 (4.6)

RR discontinuing bf: obese 2.43 (95%CI: 1.40, 4.20, p = 0.002) cf to underweight/normal wt women

Exclusive bf: NS

Multivariate analysis: RR = 2.03 (95%CI: 1.07, 4.5, p = 0.03)

(adjusted for infant feeding intention, work/school, satisfaction with appearance, indifference to bf)

Hilson et al 2006 [39] USA, 1988–1997

Expanded previous review of medical records [12].

Bassett Hospital, Cooperstown, NY

Intended to bf, singleton infant.

No contraindications to bf, no diabetes.

n = 2783

BMI calculated from pre-pregnancy weight and height

IOM definition of obesity

EBF = last time mother feed only breast milk, without adding non human milk, juice, solids

ABF = last feeding of any breast milk to infant

Median duration of EBF (wks):

Underweight 1.7

Normal 2.0

Overweight 1.7

Obese 1.1

p < 0.05

Median duration of ABF (wks):

Underweight 8.0

Normal 8.0

Overweight 7.0

Obese 2.0

p < 0.05

Multivariate analysis: HR of stopping bf:

Obese 1.50 (95%CI 1.11, 2.03) for normal wt gain in pregnancy

(adjusted for education, smoking, maternal age, parity, WIC, birth)

Kugyelka et al 2004 [40] USA, Hispanic women: 1998–2000; Black women: 1999–2000

Medical record review, upstate New York, all women of 'Hispanic ethnicity' (mainly Puerto Rican) (n = 235) or 'Black race' (n = 263) Healthy mothers who attempted to breastfeed with healthy single, term infant

BMI calculated from pre-pregnancy height and weight recorded on New York State prenatal form (could be measured or self-reported)

IOM definition of obesity

EBF = last time mother feed only breast milk, without adding non human milk ABF = last feeding of any breast milk to infant

Hispanic women:

Obesity assoc with shorter duration of EBF (RR: 1.5; 95%CI: 1.1, 2.0) and ABF (RR: 1.6; 95%CI: 1.1, 2.1) compared to normal wt women

Black women:

No effect of BMI on duration of EBF or ABF

Li et al 2002 [83] USA 1988–1994 (exclusive bf: Phase II, 1991–1994)

The Third National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHANES III) n = 7712

BMI calculated from self-reported ht and wt at time of interview

WHO definition of obesity

Exclusive breastfeeding at 2 months:

Normal 35.4%

Overweight 28.2%

Obese 25.9%

Breastfeeding at 6 months:

Normal 25.0%

Overweight 17.3%

Obese 16.9%

Breastfeeding at 12 months:

Normal 10.0%

Overweight 5.7%

Obese 5.6%

Li et al 2003 [49] USA 1996–1998

Pediatric Nutrition Surveillance System and the Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System Children aged < 5 years n = 124,151 (n for multivariate analysis of women who initiated breastfeeding = 13,234)

BMI calculated from self-reported pre-pregnancy weight

IOM definition of obesity

Adjusted breastfeeding duration (weeks):

Underweight 13.3

Normal weight 13.6

Overweight 13.1

Obese 11.8

(p < 0.01)

(adjusted for gestational weight gain, birth weight, gestation, parity, maternal age, education, marital status, race, smoking, prenatal care, poverty-income ratio)

Oddy et al 2006 [44] Australia 1989–1991

Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort Study. Antenatal cohort, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA n = 1803

BMI calculated from pre-pregnancy weight and height (measured by research midwives) WHO definition of obesity

Breastfeeding < 2 months:

Normal weight 24.0%

Overweight 33.6%

Obese women 41.6%

p < 0.0005

Breastfeeding < 4 months:

Normal weight 37.9%

Overweight 50.2%

Obese women 57.5%

p < 0.0005

Breastfeeding < 6 months:

Normal weight 49.0%

Overweight 59.7%

Obese women 62.8%

p = 0.001

Multivariate Cox hazards regression model:

HR (adj) = 1.18 (95%CI 1.05, 1.34) for breastfeeding per month (adjusted for education, maternal age, pregnancy problems, older siblings, smoking, solids before 4 months).

Rutishauser & Carlin 1992 [11] Australia 1984–1985

Primiparas breastfeeding > 14 days Barwon region, Victoria n = 739

(N for multivariate analysis between 570 and 600)

BMI calculated from maternal ht and wt recorded at 1 month postpartum Normal = BMI < 26, Above normal = BMI > 26

Duration of breastfeeding associated with BMI (p < 0.05)

Multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazards):

HR 1.50 (95%CI 1.11, 2.04)

(adjusted for smoking, maternal age, time to first breastfeed)

Scott et al 2006 [84] Australia 2002–2003

2^ndPerth Infant Feeding Study, cohort of women recruited in hospital. n = 587

Measurement of maternal weight and height not reported

WHO definition of obesity

Any breastfeeding at 6 months (other time periods also given):

Normal 49.0, sd 5.2

Overweight 48.3, sd 9.5

Obese: 35.7, sd 10.1

p < 0.05

Multivariate analysis NS

bf = breastfed, BMI = body mass index, ht = height, IOM = Institute of Medicine, mo = month, NS = not significant, WHO = World Health Organization, wk = week, wt = weight

Results

There were three studies that examined pregnant women's body mass index 4142 or "weight concerns" 34 and their infant feeding intentions (Table 1. Included studies on maternal obesity and women's infant feeding intentions). In a large population-based study in the UK, women identified as having "marked concern" about body shape and weight on a questionnaire were significantly less likely to intend to breastfeed their infant up to four months after adjusting for a range of variables 34. A small US study found that obese women planned to breastfeed for a shorter duration (6.9 months) than other women (9.3 to 9.8 months) 42.

Nine of the ten studies of breastfeeding initiation found that overweight and obese women were less likely to commence breastfeeding (Table 2. Included studies on maternal obesity and initiation of breastfeeding). The exception was one study in Russia where virtually all women initiated breastfeeding 43; the other studies were conducted in the USA (n = 5), Australia (n = 3) and the UK (n = 1). The difference was statistically significant in most studies, but not for black women in the US in the study by Kugyelka 40, nor for women in two studies in Western Australia 4445. The estimated size of the effect (OR of not commencing compared with normal weight women) ranged from 1.19 to 2.17 for overweight women and from 1.38 to 3.09 for obese women in these studies (see Table 2).

Table 3 shows the five studies which have examined the relationship between obesity and a delayed onset of lactogenesis (the arrival of a copious milk supply). All studies were conducted in the USA and the sample size ranged from 40 to 280. Delayed onset was found in three studies 154647. Overweight/obese women were more likely to have late arrival of milk (33%) than normal women (16%), with a relative risk of 2.46 on multivariate analysis 47. Infants of overweight/obese women were more likely to have suboptimal feeding behaviour on multivariate analysis (RR 2.58) 47. One study found that overweight/obese women fed their infants for longer (23 minutes) than normal weight women (15 minutes) and had a lower prolactin response to suckling at 48 hours, but not 7 days, compared to normal weight women 16. One study didn't have enough power to detect a difference 42. No study found a faster onset of lactation or improved infant feeding in overweight or obese women.

A medical record review in the US found that obese women were less likely to have put the baby to the breast within the first two hours than normal weight women 40.

The studies reporting on maternal obesity and duration of breastfeeding are presented in Table 4. There were fifteen studies, of which seven were conducted in the USA, five in Australia, and one each in Denmark, Kuwait and Russia. The majority of large studies found that obese women breastfed for a shorter duration than normal weight women, even after adjusting for possible confounding factors 11121339444849. Studies in Russia 43 and Denmark 50 with high breastfeeding initiation rates found no difference in breastfeeding duration according to maternal obesity. A recent Australian study of 764 women found that obese women were less likely to be breastfeeding at six months than women with a normal BMI 48. Obese women had an odds of 0.49 (95%CI 0.28, 0.85) for breastfeeding at six months compared to women with a normal BMI, adjusted for a range of factors including infant feeding intention, maternal age, smoking and depression 48. In the USA, Kugyelka and colleagues found no effect of obesity in duration of breastfeeding in black women (while they did find a relationship in Hispanic women) 40. Only one study, in Kuwait, found that higher maternal weight (120% of standard reference weight for height) was associated with longer duration of breastfeeding 51.

Discussion

Possible reasons why overweight/obese women are less likely to breastfeed

1. Anatomical/physiological

Several studies have investigated delayed lactogenesis II (the onset of a copious milk supply) in obese women (Table 3). They reported delayed lactogenesis according to maternal perception and to physiological markers. Obesity remained associated with delayed lactogenesis after adjusting for several possible confounding factors, but infant feeding intention was not included. As obese women intend to breastfeed for shorter durations than other women, perhaps part of the delay in time to first feed 40 and tendency to give up before hospital discharge is behavioural rather than physiological.

Adipose tissue acts as a reservoir for steroid hormones and is also a site of steroid production and metabolism 5253. One theory for the delay in lactogenesis II is that progesterone stored in adipose tissue leads to higher progesterone levels in obese women than normal-weight women which disrupts the usual sudden drop in progesterone leading to lactogenesis II 54. However the only study to investigate this found no difference in serum progesterone levels between obese/overweight women and normal weight women 16.

Although women with large breasts are not necessarily obese, obese women will often have large breasts, and there are indications in the literature that large breasts have been associated with breastfeeding difficulties. Historically it was thought that wet nurses with large breasts were poor milk producers 55. "Overly large breasts usually betrayed a true poverty of milk, for the heavy fat parts impeded the separation of the milk and its free passage through the narrow conduits to the nipples" [55, p52]. A study of perceived insufficient milk found that women with a high BMI were more likely to experience an earlier onset of "insufficient milk" (p < 0.05), but this was not significant in multivariate survival analysis 56. In contrast, Rutishauser and Carlin found that overweight/obese women were less likely to give "poor milk supply" as the reason for early cessation of breastfeeding than women of normal weight (p < 0.05) 11.

Women with large breasts may have practical/mechanical difficulties with attaching the baby to the breast 5758. It can be awkward to support a large breast while assisting a baby to latch on; sometimes the nipple/areola may not be visible to the mother. Some women with large breasts have broad areolae (rather than conical) with short nipples making it difficult to attach the baby 19. Lactation consultants have noticed that the weight of a large, heavy breast on the infant's chest can interfere with successful attachment 21.

2. Medical conditions

Obese and overweight women are over-represented in gynaecological and reproductive medicine clinics 53. They are more likely to have medical conditions such as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and diabetes, and to experience obstetric complications and caesarean birth than women of normal weight 2859. Women with diabetes and those who give birth by Caesarean section may be more likely to experience delayed lactogenesis or low milk supply 606162. Some women with PCOS have insufficient milk supply, which is thought to be related to the endocrinological changes associated with the syndrome (high levels of androgens, insulin resistance, frequently low progesterone levels) 23.

Some studies have taken this into account by recruiting only women without medical conditions 3039 or using multivariate analysis to adjust for these factors 12. Studies have found that women with early-onset obesity (eg prior to menarche) are more likely to have ovulatory disturbances than women with later-onset obesity 52. Animal studies have also found that early-onset obesity may negatively affect adult function. Cows with high rates of growth before puberty have less mammary development (as measured by mammary DNA) 6364. A meta-analysis of eight experimental studies of prepubertal weight gain in Holstein heifers, found that first-lactation production increased as weight gains increased up to 799 g/day, however higher weight gains were associated with lower milk production 65. In humans, breastfeeding success (or duration) has not been studied in relation to the onset of obesity in the mother (i.e. in childhood before the development of the breasts) or in later life

3. Socio-cultural

Women who are obese are more likely to belong to social groups who are less likely to breastfeed, such as lower socio-economic status 6667 and less likely to have been breastfed themselves 3168. As with women who smoke, obese women have lower intention to breastfeed 3769. Obese women are less likely to participate in preventative health behaviours such having Pap smears and mammography 70. This may relate to their health beliefs or to feelings of embarrassment with exposure of body parts; it is likely that overweight/obese women may feel more uncomfortable with the idea of breastfeeding in public. Furthermore, large breasts may make if difficult to breastfeed "discretely" and thus "modesty" may another reason for some women to avoid breastfeeding.

Yet in some cultures, maternal weight appears to have no relationship with infant feeding. Indigenous women in Canada have high levels of overweight and obesity and high levels of breastfeeding 71.

4. Psychological

Obese women tend to have greater body image dissatisfaction compared with non-obese women 72. Women with increased concern about their body shape or weight are less likely to intend to breastfeed 34.

Obese women tend to have lower self-esteem 73 and poorer mental health than normal weight women 74. Obese mothers are more likely to have postpartum depression 18; depressed mothers are less likely to continue breastfeeding than non-depressed mothers 75. A small study of obese formula-feeding mothers found that they spent less time interacting with infants over a 24 hour testing period than non-obese mothers 76.

What to do about it?

Clinicians need to be aware that obese women are at high risk of not breastfeeding, yet a recent study found clinicians did not manage obese women differently from normal weight women 26. A new review of maternal obesity in pregnancy acknowledged "the increased risk of lactation failure and delay in establishing lactation postdelivery" [77 p1137], yet did not mention infant feeding in their management guidelines. Obese women may experience a delay in the onset of lactation but in supportive environments breastfeeding can be successfully established.

Future physiological and epidemiological studies could focus on obese women with a strong intention to breastfeed and without medical or obstetric complications in order to compare breastfeeding success in these women with similar women with normal BMI. To date, no studies have examined this issue from the women's perspective. We urgently need qualitative studies to help us understand obese women and their infant feeding decisions and behaviour. Any potential interventions aimed at helping overweight and obese women to breastfeed successfully need to be evaluated in randomised controlled trials.

Conclusion

Breastfeeding behaviour is multifactorial, and a wide range of socio-cultural and physiological variables impact on a woman's decision and ability to breastfeed successfully. Breastfeeding rates vary from population group to group – the variation is usually due to social rather than biological factors. Our analysis of maternal smoking and breastfeeding found that maternal infant feeding intention was a more powerful predictor of breastfeeding duration than whether the mother smoked or not 78. Smokers with a strong intention to breastfeed were more likely to continue breastfeeding that non-smokers with a low intention to breastfeed, i.e. the social factors were more important than the possible negative physiological effects of nicotine on breast milk supply 78.

Evidence suggests that lactational performance is not compromised by low BMI 79; it is still unclear if obesity per se has a role in reduced lactation in overweight and obese women. There are many psychological, behavioral and cultural reasons that may be responsible for reduced lactation in obese women. It is clear that there is a relationship between obesity and variables associated with lower rates of breastfeeding: lower income, depression, body image concerns. Evidence such as obese women's lower intention 344142 and a 10% greater chance of not putting the baby to the breast in the first two hours of life 40 will lead to physiological differences between obese women and normal weight women – but the differences may not be due to obesity per se.

However a number of epidemiological 11121339444849 and animal studies 8081 do suggest that maternal obesity is detrimental to lactation. One possibility is that the impact of obesity on lactation is related to the age of development of obesity, as prepubertal obesity is detrimental to lactation in dairy cows 65. Further studies into the timing of obesity during women's reproductive lifetime may help to clarify this. In addition, qualitative studies as well as quantitative studies should be undertaken to explore the relationship between maternal obesity and breastfeeding.

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

LHA reviewed the literature and wrote the first draft of the paper. SD calculated summary statistics and revised the paper.

Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT): a randomized trial in the Republic of Belarus. Kramer MS Chalmers B Hodnett ED Sevkovskaya Z Dzikovich I Shapiro S et al PROBIT Study Group (Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial) JAMA 2001 285 4 413 420 10.1001/jama.285.4.413 11242425 A systematic review of the literature associating breastfeeding with type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes Taylor JS Kacmar JE Nothnagle M Lawrence RA J Am Coll Nutr 2005 24 5 320 326 16192255 Duration of breastfeeding and risk of overweight: A meta-analysis Harder T Bergmann R Kallischnigg G Plagemann A Am J Epidemiol 2005 162 397 403 10.1093/aje/kwi222 16076830 Effect of infant feeding on the risk of obesity across the life course: A quantitative review of published evidence Owen CG Martin RM Whincup PH Davey Smith G Cook DG Pediatrics 2005 115 5 1367 1377 10.1542/peds.2004-1176 15867049 Assessing the population impact of low rates of breastfeeding on asthma, coeliac disease and obesity: the use of a new statistical method Akobeng AK Heller RF Arch Dis Child 2007 92 6 483 485 10.1136/adc.2006.097667 16840504 Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic: report of a WHO consultation World Health Organization World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000 894 i 253 11234459 Obesity and pregnancy: complications and cost Galtier-Dereure F Boegner C Bringer J Am J Clin Nutr 2000 71(suppl) 1242S 48S The prevalence and impact of overweight and obesity in an Australian population Callaway LK Prins JB Chang AM McIntyre HD Med J Aust 2006 184 2 56 59 16411868 Trends in maternal obesity incidence rates, demographic predictors, and health inequalities in 36 821 women over a 15-year period Heslehurst N Ells LJ Batterham A Wilkinson J Summerbell CD BJOG 2007 114 2 187 194 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01180.x 17305899 Preventing obesity: A life cycle perspective Johnson DB Gerstein DE Evans AE Woodward-Lopez G J Am Diet Assoc 2006 106 97 102 10.1016/j.jada.2005.09.048 16390672 Body mass index and duration of breast feeding: a survival analysis during the first six months of life. Rutishauser IHE Carlin JB J Epidemiol Community Health 1992 46 559 565 1494068 Maternal obesity and breast-feeding success in a rural population of white women Hilson JA Rasmussen KM Kjolhede CL Am J Clin Nutr 1997 66 1371 1378 9394689 Does maternal obesity adversely affect breastfeeding initiation and duration? Donath SM Amir LH J Paediatr Child Health 2000 36 482 486 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2000.00562.x 11036806 Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London Sebire NJ Jolly M Harris JP Wadsworth J Joffe M Beard RW Regan L Robinson S Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001 25 8 1175 1182 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801670 11477502 Identification of risk factors for delayed onset of lactation Chapman DJ Perez-Escamilla R J Am Diet Assoc 1999 99 450 454 10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00109-1 10207398 Prepregnant overweight and obesity diminish the prolactin response to suckling in the first week postpartum Rasmussen KM Kjolhede CL Pediatrics 2004 113 e465 e471 10.1542/peds.113.5.e465 15121990 Prevalence of obesity in Great Britain Rennie KL Jebb SA Obesity Reviews 2005 6 11 12 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00164.x 15655034 Maternal body mass index and self-reported postpartum depressive symptoms LaCoursiere DY Baksh L Bloebaum L Varnier MW Matern Child Health J 2006 10 4 385 390 10.1007/s10995-006-0075-1 16673179 Assisting the newborn to latch on to the very large breast: HELP! Coates MM J Hum Lact 1989 5 3 131 132 10.1177/089033448900500310 2775464 Lactation compromised in obese mothers Durkin D Central Lines 2004 20 4 8 Latch-on difficulties: a clinical observation (Letter) Hoover K J Hum Lact 2000 16 1 6 10.1177/089033440001600102 Is maternal obesity a cause of poor lactation performance? Loveday CA Nutrition Reviews 2005 63 10 352 355 10.1301/nr.2005.oct.352-355 16295148 Polycystic ovary syndrome: A connection to insufficient milk supply? Marasco L Marmet C Shell E J Hum Lact 2000 16 2 143 148 10.1177/089033440001600211 11153345 Obesity may impair lactogenesis II Rasmussen KM Hilson JA Kjolhede CL J Nutr 2001 131 3009S 3011S 11694637 Obesity as a risk factor for failure to initiate and sustain lactation Rasmussen KM Hilson JA Kjolhede CL Adv Exp Med Biol 2002 503 217 222 12026023 A description of lactation counseling practices that are used with obese mothers Rasmussen KM Lee VE Ledkovsky TB Kjolhede CL J Hum Lact 2006 22 3 322 327 10.1177/0890334406290177 16885492 BMI and duration of breast feeding (letter) Seidman DS J Epidemiol Community Health 1993 47 6 508 8120510 Obesity in pregnancy Yu CKH Teoh TG Robinson S BJOG 2006 113 10 1117 1125 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00991.x 16903839 The Copenhagen cohort study on infant nutrition and growth: duration of breastfeeding and influencing factors Michaelsen KF Larsen PS Thomsen BL Samuelson G Acta Pædiatr 1994 83 6 565 571 Determinants of lactation performance across time in an urban population from Mexico Perez-Escamilla R Segura-Millan S Pollitt E Dewey KG Soc Sci Med 1993 37 8 1069 1078 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90441-6 8235739 Factors associated with initiation and duration of breastfeeding in Italy Riva E Banderali G Agostoni C Silano M Radaelli G Giovannini M Acta Paediatr 1999 88 411 415 10.1080/08035259950169792 10342540 Association of birth weight and breastfeeding with coronary heart disease risk factors at the age of 6 years Thorsdottir I Gunnarsdottir I Palsson GI Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2003 13 267 272 10.1016/S0939-4753(03)80030-3 14717058 Biological and sociocultural determinants of successful lactation among women in eastern Connecticut Ferris AM McCabe LT Allen LH Pelto GH J Am Diet Assoc 1987 87 3 316 3121 3819251 Extreme attitudes to body shape, social and psychological factors and a reluctance to breast feed. Barnes J Stein A Smith T Pollock JI ALSPAC Study Team J R Soc Med 1997 90 551 559 1296597 9488013 Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry World Health Organization Expert Committee World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1995 854 1-452 8594834 Nutrition during Pregnancy Institute of Medicine Washington DC , National Academy Press 1990 Relationship between prenatal infant feeding intention and initiation and duration of breastfeeding: a cohort study Donath SM Amir LH ALSPAC Study Team Acta Paediatr 2003 92 3 352 356 10.1080/08035250310009293 12725552 Towards a National System for Monitoring Breastfeeding in Australia: Recommendations for Population Indicators, Definitions and Next Steps Webb K Marks GC Lund-Adams M Rutishauser IHG Abraham B AusInfo, Canberra , Australian Food and Nutrition Monitoring Unit, University of Queensland 2001 Excessive weight gain during pregnancy is associated with earlier termination of breast-feeding among white women Hilson JA Rasmussen KM Kjolhede CL J Nutr 2006 136 140 146 16365073 Maternal obesity is negatively associated with breastfeeding success among Hispanic but not black women Kugyelka JG Rasmussen KM Frongillo EA J Nutr 2004 134 1746 1753 15226464 Body image, maternal fetal attachment, and breast feeding Foster SF Slade P Wilson K J Psychosom Res 1996 41 2 181 184 10.1016/0022-3999(96)00035-9 8887831 High prepregnant body mass index is associated with poor lactation outcomes among white, rural women independent of psychosocial and demographic correlates Hilson JA Rasmussen KM Kjolhede CL J Hum Lact 2004 20 1 18 29 10.1177/0890334403261345 14974697 Socio-demographic determinants of initiation and duration of breastfeeding in northwest Russia Grjibovski AM Yngve A Bygren LO Sjostrom M Acta Paediatr 2005 94 588 594 10.1080/08035250410023296 16188748 The association of maternal overweight and obesity with breastfeeding duration Oddy WH Li J Landsborough L Kendall GE Henderson S Downie J J Pediatr 2006 149 185 191 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.005 16887431 Temporal changes in the determinants of breastfeeding initiation Scott JA Binns CW Graham KI Oddy WH Birth 2006 33 1 37 45 16499530 Maternal perception of the onset of lactation is a valid, public health indicator of lactogenesis stage II Chapman DJ Perez-Escamilla R J Nutr 2000 130 2972 2980 11110856 Risk factors for suboptimal infant breastfeeding behavior, delayed onset of lactation, and excess neonatal weight loss Dewey KG Nommsen LA Heinig MJ Cohen RJ Pediatrics 2003 112 3 607 619 10.1542/peds.112.3.607 12949292 Factors associated with continuing to feed any breast milk at six months postpartum in a group of Australian women Forster D McLachlan H Lumley J Int Breastfeed J 2006 1 18 1635041 17034645 10.1186/1746-4358-1-18 Maternal obesity and breastfeeding practices Li R Jewell S Grummer-Strawn L Am J Clin Nutr 2003 77 4 931 936 12663294 Maternal prepregnant body mass index, duration of breastfeeding, and timing of complementary food introduction are associated with infant weight gain Baker JL Michaelsen KF Rasmussen KM Sorensen TIA Am J Clin Nutr 2004 80 6 1579 1588 15585772 Infant feeding pattern and weaning practices in Kuwait Amine EK Al-Awadi F Rabie M J R Soc Health 1989 109 5 178 180 2509706 Reproductive endocrinologic alterations in female asymptomatic obesity Azziz R Fertil Steril 1989 52 703 725 2680625 Obesity and reproductive disorders: a review Norman RJ Clark AM Reprod Fertil Dev 1998 10 55 63 10.1071/R98010 9727593 Infant Feeding: The Physiological Basis Akre J Geneva , World Health Organization 1989 21 23 Blood and milk: medical and popular beliefs before the First World War Whitaker ED Measuring Mamma's Milk: Fascism and the Medicalization of Maternity in Italy Ann Arbor , The University of Michigan Press 2000 29 61 Factors associated with perceived insufficient milk in a low-income urban population in Mexico Segura-Millan S Dewey KG Perez-Escamilla R J Nutr 1994 124 202 212 8308569 Influence of the maternal anatomy and physiology on lactation Walker M Breastfeeding Management for the Clinician: Using the Evidence Sudbury, Massachusetts , Jones and Bartlett Publishers 2006 51 82 Breastfeeding with large breasts McAllan A http://www.breastfeeding.asn.au/bfinfo/large.html The impact of obesity on reproduction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Pasquali R Gambineri A Pagotto U BJOG 2006 113 10 1148 1159 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00990.x 16827825 Milk lactose, citrate, and glucose as markers of lactogenesis in normal and diabetic women. Arthur PG Smith M Hartmann PE J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1989 9 4 488 496 2621526 Delayed lactogenesis in women with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus Neubauer SH Ferris AM Chase CG Fanelli J Thompson CA Lammi-Keefe CJ Clark RM Jensen RG Bendel RB Green KW Am J Clin Nutr 1993 58 54 60 8317390 Baby Friendly Hospital practices: Cesarean section is a persistent barrier to early initiation of breastfeeding Rowe-Murray HJ Fisher JRW Birth 2002 29 2 124 131 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2002.00172.x 12000413 Influence of prepubertal dietary regimen on mammary growth of Holstein heifers Capuco AV Smith JJ Waldo DR Rexroad CE J Dairy Sci 1995 78 2709 2725 8675754 High body weight gain and reduced bovine mammary growth: physiological basis and implications for milk yield potential Sejrsen K Purup S Vestergaard M Foldager J Domest Anim Endocrinol 2000 19 93 104 10.1016/S0739-7240(00)00070-9 11025189 Meta-analysis to assess effect of prepubertal average daily gain of Holstein heifers on first-lactation production Zanton GI Heinrichs AJ J Dairy Sci 2005 88 3860 3867 16230691 Obesity: responding to the global epidemic Wadden TA Brownell KD Foster GD J Consult Clin Psychol 2002 70 3 510 525 10.1037/0022-006X.70.3.510 12090366 Rates of breastfeeding in Australia by State and socioeconomic status: evidence from the 1995 National Health Survey Donath S Amir LH J Paediatr Child Health 2000 36 2 164 168 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2000.00486.x 10760016 Maternal characteristics associated with the duration of breast-feeding Jones DA West RR Newcombe RG Midwifery 1986 2 141 146 10.1016/S0266-6138(86)80005-5 3640995 Does maternal smoking have a negative physiological effect on breastfeeding? The epidemiological evidence Amir LH Donath SM Birth 2002 29 2 112 123 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2002.00152.x 12000412 Screening for cervical and breast cancer: is obesity an unrecognized barrier to preventive care? Wee CC McCarthy EP Davis RB Phillips RS Ann Intern Med 2000 132 9 697 704 10787362 Beliefs and practices of first nation women about weight gain during pregnancy and lactation: Implications for women's health Vallianatos H Brennand EA Raine K Stephen Q Petawabano B Dannenbaum D Willows ND The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 2006 38 1 102 119 16671283 Assessment of body image dissatisfaction in obese women: specificity, severity, and clinical significance Sarwer DB Wadden TA Foster GD J Consult Clin Psychol 1998 66 4 651 654 10.1037/0022-006X.66.4.651 9735582 Correlates of body image dissatisfaction among overweight women seeking weight loss Matz PE Foster GD Faith MS Wadden TA J Consult Clin Psychol 2002 70 4 1040 1044 10.1037/0022-006X.70.4.1040 12182267 Depression and obesity Stunkard AJ Faith MS Allison KC Biol Psychiatry 2003 54 3 330 337 10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00608-5 12893108 Birth events, birth experiences and social differences in postnatal depression Astbury J Brown S Lumley J Small R Aust J Public Health 1994 18 176 184 7948335 Relationship between maternal obesity and infant feeding-interactions Rising R Lifshitz F Nutr J 2005 4 17 1156942 15890076 10.1186/1475-2891-4-17 Maternal obesity in pregnancy: Is it time for meaningful research to inform preventive and management strategies? Krishnamoorthy U Schram CM Hill SR BJOG 2006 113 10 1134 1140 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01045.x 16972858 The relationship between maternal smoking and breastfeeding duration after adjustment for maternal infant feeding intention Donath SM Amir LH ALSPAC Study Team Acta Paediatr 2004 93 1514 1518 10.1080/08035250410022125 15513582 Body mass index and lactation performance Prentice AM Goldberg GR Prentice A Eur J Clin Nutr 1994 48 S78 S89 7843163 Effects of under- and overnutrition on lactation in laboratory rats Rasmussen KM J Nutr 1998 128 390S 93S 9478033 Diet-induced obesity impairs mammary development and lactogenesis in murine mammary gland Flint DJ Travers MT Barber MC Binart N Kelly PA Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2005 288 E1179 87 10.1152/ajpendo.00433.2004 15671082 Social variations in fetal growth in a Russian setting: an analysis of medical records Grjibovski AM Bygren LO Svartbo B Magnus P Ann Epidemiol 2003 13 599 605 10.1016/S1047-2797(03)00052-8 14732298 Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding among US infants: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (Phase II, 1991-1994) Li R Ogden C Ballew C Gillespie C Grummer-Strawn L Am J Public Health 2002 92 7 1107 1110 1447197 12084691 Predictors of breastfeeding duration: evidence from a cohort study Scott JA Binns CW Oddy WH Graham KI Pediatrics 2006 117 4 e646 55 10.1542/peds.2005-1991 16585281

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/7/9/prepub