Geriatric rehabilitation of stroke patients in nursing homes: a study protocol

1471-2318-10-151471-2318 Study protocol Geriatric rehabilitation of stroke patients in nursing homes: a study protocol Spruit-van EijkMonicam.spruit-vaneijk@elg.umcn.nl BuijckIBiancab.buijck@elg.umcn.nl ZuidemaUSytses.zuidema@elg.umcn.nl VonckenLMFransfrans.voncken@zorgboog.nl GeurtsCHAlexandera.geurts@reval.umcn.nl KoopmansTCMRaymondr.koopmans@elg.umcn.nl

Department of Primary and Community Care, Centre for Family Medicine, Geriatric Care and Public Health, Radboud University Nijmegen- Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 21 Nijmegen 6525 EZ, the Netherlands

SVRZ, Koudekerkseweg 143, Middelburg 4335 SM, the Netherlands

De Zorgboog, Roessel 3, Bakel 5761 RP, the Netherlands

Department of Rehabilitation, Nijmegen Centre for Evidence Based Practice, Radboud University Nijmegen- Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 21, Nijmegen 6525 EZ, the Netherlands

BMC Geriatrics 1471-2318 2010 10 1 15 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/10/15 2034617510.1186/1471-2318-10-15 201201027320102732010 2010Eijk et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Geriatric patients are typically underrepresented in studies on the functional outcome of rehabilitation after stroke. Moreover, most geriatric stroke patients do probably not participate in intensive rehabilitation programs as offered by rehabilitation centers. As a result, very few studies have described the successfulness of geriatric stroke rehabilitation in nursing home patients, although it appears that the majority of these patients are being discharged back to the community, rather than being transferred to residential care. Nevertheless, factors associated with the successfulness of stroke rehabilitation in nursing homes or skilled nursing facilities are largely unknown. The primary goal of this study is, therefore, to assess the factors that uniquely contribute to the successfulness of rehabilitation in geriatric stroke patients that undergo rehabilitation in nursing homes. A secondary goal is to investigate whether these factors are similar to those associated with the outcome of stroke rehabilitation in the literature.

Methods/Design

This study is part of the Geriatric Rehabilitation in AMPutation and Stroke (GRAMPS) study in the Netherlands. It is a longitudinal, observational, multicenter study in 15 nursing homes in the Southern part of the Netherlands that aims to include at least 200 patients. All participating nursing homes are selected based on the existence of a specialized rehabilitation unit and the provision of dedicated multidisciplinary care. Patient characteristics, disease characteristics, functional status, cognition, behavior, and caregiver information, are collected within two weeks after admission to the nursing home. The first follow-up is at discharge from the nursing home or one year after inclusion, and focuses on functional status and behavior. Successful rehabilitation is defined as discharge from the nursing home to an independent living situation within one year after admission. The second follow-up is three months after discharge in patients who rehabilitated successfully, and assesses functional status, behavior, and quality of life. All instruments used in this study have shown to be valid and reliable in rehabilitation research or are recommended by the Netherlands Heart Foundation guidelines for stroke rehabilitation.

Data will be analyzed using SPSS 16.0. Besides descriptive analyses, both univariate and multivariate analyses will be performed with the purpose of identifying associated factors as well as their unique contribution to determining successful rehabilitation.

Discussion

This study will provide more information about geriatric stroke rehabilitation in Dutch nursing homes. To our knowledge, this is the first large study that focuses on the determinants of success of geriatric stroke rehabilitation in nursing home patients.

Background

According to the World Health Organization, 15 million people worldwide suffered a stroke in 2004 1 . It has been reported that the mean stroke incidence rate in Western countries is 94 per 100.000 person years 2 . Although men are more often affected than women due to a younger age of onset, this gender difference becomes smaller with increasing age 3 . Stroke incidence typically increases with age and, due to the ageing of the population, stroke incidence rates are expected to rise. High age and low level of physical endurance, due to significant comorbidity, are characteristic of the geriatric stroke population. Although rehabilitation after stroke is an important activity in many rehabilitation centers worldwide, most geriatric stroke patients are probably not admitted to these centers and, thus, do not participate in intensive rehabilitation programs 4 . These patients may be referred to nursing homes or skilled nursing facilities (SNF) that provide adapted rehabilitation programs combined with residential care, whereas others may not receive any formal type of multidisciplinary rehabilitation at all. As a result, geriatric stroke patients are greatly underrepresented in outcome studies and factors associated with the successfulness of their rehabilitation are largely unknown.

Few studies have dealt with the influence of comorbidity and age on the outcome of stroke rehabilitation. Atalay and Turhan 5 found that elderly stroke patients (older than 65 years of age) were less likely to be successfully rehabilitated despite similar Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores on admission, compared to patients younger than 65 years. Yet, comorbidity and age were not associated with prolonged length of stay in the rehabilitation center. In the same vein, Fischer et al. 6 found that comorbidity and age did not uniquely contribute to predicting length of hospital stay. On the other hand, there is evidence that comorbidity and age are important factors in determining functional outcome after stroke 7 . Several additional studies have emphasized the importance of age for functional outcome after stroke, but estimates of the true impact of age seem to vary greatly. Whereas some studies reported a relatively small influence of age 8 9 , other studies found that very old age, defined as 85 years and older, was a consistently strong predictor of poor outcome 10 .

Interestingly, Teasell et al. 4 have reported that rehabilitation in 'lower band' patients recovering from severe stroke, who were considered inappropriate for conventional inpatient rehabilitation programs, may still be quite successful in terms of gain in independency of self-care and ambulation. However, although the patients were on average 72 years of age, this study did not specifically focus on geriatric rehabilitation and did not examine the influence of comorbidity or age on rehabilitation outcome. Several other studies have shown that a substantial number of stroke patients that receive rehabilitation in SNFs or nursing homes can be successfully discharged to the community 11 12 13 . The probability of discharge greatly depends on individual rehabilitation potential, which is related to stroke severity and physical capacities. Besides, it appears that admission to SNFs increases the likelihood of successful rehabilitation in terms of discharge to the community 11 12 .

In general, many studies have investigated the clinical, biological and demographic factors associated with the outcome after stroke 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 . A large number of such factors has been associated with the outcome after stroke rehabilitation (table 1), but probably many of these factors are interrelated. This implicates that the unique contribution of these factors to stroke outcome, corrected for association with other factors, still has to be determined in order to be of value for clinical prediction in daily practice. In short, initial disability and age seem to be the most promising predictors of long-term activities of daily living (ADL) and discharge destination after rehabilitation.

Table 1

Factors associated with stroke outcome disability and discharge destination in the literature

Outcome

Factors associated with outcome

ADL scores

FIM

- Initial FIM, age 89

- Initial BI 14

- Initial NIHSS, age, premorbid disability, DM, infarct volume 15

- Trunk Impairment Scale, static sitting balance 16

Discharge destination

- Age, incontinence 18

- initial FIM, age 17

- premorbid social support, FIM bowel, age, CMSA leg, type of premorbid accommodation 19

- initial MMSE, premorbid living with relatives 8

- discharge BI, LOS, age 20

- Initial FIM, age, male gender 4

- swallowing disorder 21

FIM functional independence measure, BI barthel index, NIHSS

national institute of health stroke scale, DM diabetes mellitus,

CMSA Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment, LOS length of stay

Against this background, the primary goal of this study is to assess the factors that uniquely contribute to the successfulness of rehabilitation in geriatric stroke patients that undergo rehabilitation in nursing homes. Functional outcome is primarily assessed by discharge to an independent living situation and, secondarily, by various functional scales. A secondary goal is to investigate whether the factors that are uniquely associated with successfulness of rehabilitation in this geriatric population are similar to those associated with the outcome of stroke rehabilitation in the literature. To this end, we have set up a multicenter study in 15 nursing homes in the Southern part of the Netherlands. All participating nursing homes are selected based on the existence of a specialized stroke rehabilitation unit and the provision of dedicated multidisciplinary care. To our knowledge, this is the first study that focuses on the determinants of success of geriatric rehabilitation in nursing home patients.

Methods/Design

Study design

This prospective study is part of the Nijmegen Geriatric Rehabilitation in AMPutation and Stroke (GRAMPS) study and comprises three measurements. Baseline data (T0) are collected within two weeks after admission to the nursing home. Patients and disease characteristics, functional status, cognition, behavior and caregiver information are registered (table 2). The first follow-up (T1) is at discharge from the nursing home, and focuses on functional status and behavior. Successful rehabilitation is defined as discharge from the nursing home to an independent living situation within one year after admission. The second follow-up (T2) is at three months after discharge in patients who rehabilitated successfully and focuses on functional status, behavior and quality of life.

Table 2

Research instruments

Instrument

Patient

Patient characteristics

Co-morbidity: Charlson Index

Medication list

Functional status

Motricity index Arm and Leg*

Trunk control test*

Trunk impairment scale

Barthel index*

Social activity: Frenchay activities index*

One leg standing balance

Frenchay arm test*

Berg Balance scale*

Functional Ambulation Categories*

10 m walking speed*

Water swallowing test*

Cognition

Mini Mental State Examination

Star cancellation test

Hetero anamnestic cognition test

Apraxia test

Communication: SAN score*

Behavior

Neuropsychiatric inventory questionnaire

Neuropsychiatric inventory Nursing Home

Quality of life

Global depression scale 8

Caregivers

RAND 36 version 2

Social situation

COOP WONCA

Caregiver strain index*

*: test recommended by the Netherlands Heart Foundation

SAN stichting afasie Nederland (Dutch Aphasia Foundation), COOP WONCA The

Dartmouth COOP Functional Health Assessment Charts/WONCA

Data collection has started in January 2008, and will end in July 2010.

Patients

All patients who are consecutively admitted to one of the specialized rehabilitation wards of the 15 participating nursing homes are eligible to participate in this study. No other inclusion criteria were applied. Inability to give informed consent is an exclusion criterion. All participating nursing homes collaborate in the Nijmegen University Nursing Home Network of the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center. After admission patients are provided with oral information from the treating physician or nurse. In addition, all patients and their caregivers receive written information about the study. The patients indicate themselves whether they are interested to participate. The attending physician judges the legal capacity of his/her patients. In the case of doubts he/she consults the caregivers. In addition, the GRAMPS website http://www.gramps.nl provides extra information for interested patients and their caregivers.

Ethical approval

This research protocol was presented to the medical ethics committee of the district Nijmegen- Arnhem, the Netherlands. Ethics approval was not deemed necessary, because the design is observational and because legally incapable patients are excluded.

Assessment instruments

Data are collected by the multidisciplinary teams working in the participating nursing homes. Each discipline has the obligation to perform specific assessments. The selected outcome measures have been selected based on previously established reliability and validity or based on recommendations by the Netherlands Heart Foundation guidelines for stroke rehabilitation (table 2) 26 .

• Patient characteristics

General patient characteristics as well as disease characteristics, medication lists, and information about comorbidity, using the Charlson Index (CI), are registered. The CI comprises 19 categories of diagnoses from the International Classification of Diseases, (9th revision Clinical Modification ICD-9CM) and is based on a set of risk factors for one-year mortality risk 27 . The CI contains a weighted index for each disease at which the score is a significant predictor of one-year survival. One-year mortality rate for the different scores are: "0" 12%, "1-2" 26%, "3-4" 52% and ">5" 85%.

• Functional status

The Barthel Index (BI), modified by Collin et al. in 1988 28 , measures dependency in activities of daily living (ADL). The BI is a valid and reliable instrument in stroke research 28 29 30 31 . The total score ranges from 0-20, with 20 representing complete functional independence. The Frenchay activities index (FAI) is used for assessment of extended ADL. The FAI 32 scores the actual activities undertaken by patients and can be divided in three domains: domestic housework, indoor activities and outdoor activities. The 15-item questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring functional outcome in stroke patients 33 34 . Even proxies give reliable information about FAI items 35 36 .

The Frenchay Arm Test (FAT) is used to evaluate arm function after stroke. The patient is asked to perform five activities with his affected arm, for which he receives one point if successfully complete. The FAT is a valid and reliable instrument for use in stroke research 37 .

The Motricity Index 38 is used to evaluate motor impairment of the limbs. Six movements, divided in arm and leg movements, are observed. Three scores can be measured: arm score, leg score and side score. Both arm and leg scores have good criterion validity and are reliable if used by different observers 39 40 41 .

Item three of the Trunk Control Test (TCT) is used to assess static sitting balance: sitting in a balanced position on the edge of the bed for at least 30 seconds, with the feet above the ground. The Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), developed by Verheyden and colleagues 42 , evaluates motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. TIS takes movement and coordination as well as static sitting balance into account. The TCT and TIS both show good validity and reliability 40 42 .

The Berg Balance Scale (BBS)is an ordinal 14 item scale (0-56 points) developed by Berg et al. 43 to measure balance in stroke patients. Validity and reliability of the BBS is good 44 45 46 47 , however the scale is not suitable for patients with very severe impairments, who cannot maintain a balanced sitting position 44 . Ceiling effects have also been described by Mao 44 at 90-180 days post stroke. The one- leg- standing balance test, first used by Schoppen et al. 48 , is used to assess standing balance on the unaffected leg.

The Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC) 49 is a measure of the (in)dependency of gait. The FAC is an ordinal six-point scale with 0 indicating total dependency for walking and 5 indicating independent walking. The use of a walking device is allowed. Berg et al. 43 found high correlations between the BBS and FAC scores.

The Ten-Meter-Walking-Speed test (TMWS-test) times the walking speed along a distance of ten meters and can be performed at a comfortable or maximum walking speed 50 . Because the comfortable walking speed seems to be more responsive to functional recovery after stroke 51 and because the maximum walking speed can be estimated by multiplying comfortable walking speed by 1.32 52 , the TMWS- test is performed at comfortable walking speed, only by patients with a FAC score of 3 or higher.

The water swallowing test 26 is a simple bed-side test and resembles the water swallowing test proposed by Smithard and coworkers 21 . After drinking three spoons of water safely, half a glass of water is given to the patient. The patient fails in case of signs of choking. The speech therapist assesses food consistency after the patient safely drinks the water.

• Cognition

The Mini- Mental- State- Examination (MMSE), developed by Folstein and McHugh 53 , is a screening instrument for cognitive impairment, and has a fair reliability and construct validity, with a high sensitivity for moderately-severe cognitive impairment and a lower sensitivity for mild cognitive impairment 54 . It comprises items testing orientation, attention, memory, language and constructive abilities. Bottom and ceiling effects have been described 55 . An important bias in using the MMSE in stroke research is the extensive use of language, which leads to unreliable results in aphasic patients. For this reason, we will not use the MMSE in patients with severe aphasia. The Hetero-Anamnestic- Cognition list (HAC list), derived from the MMSE by Meijer in his AMDAS study 56 , is used to explore the presence of premorbid cognitive disabilities. The proxy, preferably a partner if present, is asked a few simple 'yes' or 'no' questions concerning orientation, attention and calculation, language, memory, and executive skills. Severity is judged on the basis of need of assistance or professional therapy required.

The Star Cancellation Test (SCT), an item of the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) 57 , is a screening instrument for detecting unilateral visuospatial neglect. The SCT consists of 52 large stars, 13 characters, 10 words, and 56 small stars. All small stars are to be eliminated. The researcher gives a demonstration by crossing out the two small stars in the middle. The cut-off point is 52 57 . Rough scores can be used to interpret the outcome of the SCT, rather than the visual lateralization scores 58 . There is sufficient evidence for good validity of the SCT 59 60 61 .

Van Heugten et al. developed a diagnostic tool for apraxia in stroke, based on an existing instrument 62 . This Apraxia test, differentiating between apraxia and non-apraxia, involves demonstration of object use and imitations of gestures. It has good validity and reliability 62 63 .

The SAN (Stichting Afasie Nederland = Dutch Aphasia Foundation) score is used to quantify communicative impairment in stroke patients and is part of the Aachen Aphasia Test (AAT) 64 . The SAN score is an ordinal 7-point scale with '1' indicating no communication possible and '7' indicating normal language skills 65 .

• Behavior

The NeuroPsychiatric Inventory (NPI), originally developed for dementia patients 66 , gives a global impression of behavioral problems and is applicable in other patient groups as well. The NPI comprises 12 categories of problem behaviors: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression, anxiety, euphoria, disinhibition, irritability/lability, apathy, aberrant motor activity, sleeping disorder and eating disorder. If the interviewed person, either a nurse in the NPI-Nursing Home (NPI-NH) version or a partner or close relative in the questionnaire version (NPI-q), positively answers the screening question, both frequency and severity (only in the NPI-NH version) are determined. The NPI closes each category with enquiring about emotional burden. The NPI is a valid and reliable instrument 66 , has been translated into Dutch, and has previously been used in stroke research 67 68 .

The eight item version of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-8) is a shortened patient-friendly test derived from the GDS-15 version, and has been developed specifically for the nursing home population 69 . It indicates the presence of depression at a cut-off of 3 out of 8.

• Quality of life

The RAND- 36, developed to measure health related quality of life in chronically ill patients, comprises eight dimensions: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and general mental health. It also contains an additional item about perceived health change 70 . The item scores of all dimensions need to be recoded according to the RAND health sciences program standards 71 . The RAND-36 has been translated into Dutch by van der Zee et al., and was found to be a valid, reliable, and sensitive measurement of general health 72 .

• Caregivers

The Dartmouth COOP Functional Health Assessment Charts/WONCA (COOP/WONCA) subscales 73 74 75 physical fitness, daily activities, feelings and overall health are used to measure proxy's functional status. Each subscale consists of a short title and an illustrated five-point response scale: scores 16 and up are indicative of high strain 56 .

The Caregiver Strain Index (CSI) is only used after discharge from the nursing home, when participation level of the patient plays a key role 76 . Optimal reintegration reduces the experienced strain of the caregivers. The CSI consists of 13 'yes' and 'no' questions, is an easy used instrument to identify strain, and shows validity 77 . A score of 7 or more positive responses indicates a high level of strain 78 . The CSI has been used in research on various diseases 79 80 81 .

Data analysis

All data is processed using the Statistical Package for Social Science 16.0 (SPSS 16.0). Different techniques will be used to analyze the data, depending on the research question.

• Descriptive analysis will be used for general patient characteristics, disease characteristics, treatment, successfulness of rehabilitation, and functional outcomes.

• Univariate analyses, parametric as well as non-parametric, will be performed for identifying the demographic and clinical factors that are associated with successful rehabilitation (p < 0.1).

• Associated factors will then be tested in a multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine their unique contribution and overall explained variance of successfulness of rehabilitation.

Power

The required sample size was estimated using the rule of thumb according to Peduzzi et al. 82 : At least 10 patients per factor in the smallest group, in the case of a dichotomous outcome. Based on our experience, approximately 35% of the stroke patients, admitted to nursing homes for rehabilitation, cannot be discharged to an independent living situation. When testing a maximum of seven factors in the multivariate model, 70 patients need to be included in the smallest group (35%). Consequently, a total of 200 stroke patients will be included.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first large study that focuses on the determinants of success of geriatric stroke patients admitted to nursing homes. It will provide more detailed information about the factors that are uniquely associated to the successfulness of geriatric stroke rehabilitation and that can, thus, be used in building a clinical prediction model of discharge destination from nursing homes.

All selected outcome measures have proven to be reliable and valid, or are recommended by the Netherlands Heart Foundation.

Because legally incapable patients are excluded from this study, its external validity may be slightly affected. Therefore, general patient characteristics of the excluded patients are registered and compared to those of the included patients. Besides age, length of stay in the nursing home, and discharge destination are recorded to compare both groups. This multicenter research uses multidisciplinary teams to collect the data over a period of two-and-a-half years and, thus, may suffer from some measurement inaccuracies. To minimize such inaccuracies, over 90 people working in 15 Dutch nursing homes received the same instructions about performing the outcome measures during collective meetings before the start of the study. To ensure the quality of data collection during the study, each nursing home has 2 to 3 specially assigned professionals who maintain contact with the main researchers. In addition, a newsletter is provided every 6-8 weeks to keep everybody involved, informed, and motivated with regard to the progress of the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

MS and BB are the primary investigators of the GRAMPS study, they designed the study and wrote the manuscript. The collected data will be processed and analyzed by MS and BB. SZ will help in the analysis of the data, and he participated in writing the manuscript. FV participated in the design of the study, and he reviewed this study protocol. AG participated in designing this study, writing the manuscript, and he will help in the analysis of the data. RK participated in the design of the study, and writing the manuscript, and he will help with the analysis of the data. All authors have given final approval of the version to be published.

Acknowledgements

This study is funded by "Zorgboog" and "SVRZ" and the science promotion foundation for nursing homes (SWBV). The researchers of the GRAMPS study would like to acknowledge dr H. van der Linde for his advice.

The Atlas of Heart disease and StrokeWHOWHO, Geneva2004Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic reviewFeiginVLLancet Neurol2009843556910.1016/S1474-4422(09)70025-019233729Sex differences in stroke epidemiology: a systematic reviewAppelrosPStegmayrBTerentAStroke200940410829010.1161/STROKEAHA.108.54078119211488A rehabilitation program for patients recovering from severe strokeTeasellRWCan J Neurol Sci2005324512716408584Determinants of length of stay in stroke patients: a geriatric rehabilitation unit experienceAtalayATurhanNInt J Rehabil Res2009321485210.1097/MRR.0b013e32830d368919077677Impact of comorbidity on ischemic stroke outcomeFischerUActa Neurol Scand200611321081310.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00551.x16411971Predictors of functional outcome in first-ever ischemic stroke: a special interest to ischemic subtypes, comorbidity and ageTurhanNAtalayAMuderrisogluHNeuroRehabilitation2009244321619597269Outcome predictors of rehabilitation for first stroke in the elderlyDentiLAgostiMFranceschiniMEur J Phys Rehabil Med200844131118385622Effect of age on functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitationBaggSPomboAPHopmanWStroke20023311798510.1161/hs0102.10122411779908Short- and long-term prognosis for very old stroke patients. The Copenhagen Stroke StudyKammersgaardLPAge Ageing20043321495410.1093/ageing/afh05214960430Skilled nursing facility rehabilitation and discharge to home after strokeWodchisWPArch Phys Med Rehabil2005863442810.1016/j.apmr.2004.06.06715759226The relation between therapy intensity and outcomes of rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilitiesJetteDUWarrenRLWirtallaCArch Phys Med Rehabil2005863373910.1016/j.apmr.2004.10.01815759214Efficacy of agreements within the Enchede Stroke Service to refer patients with a stroke from the stroke unit in the hospital to a nursing home for short-term rehabilitationNijmeijerNMNed Tijdschr Geneeskd2005149422344916261715Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theoriesKwakkelGKollenBLindemanERestor Neurol Neurosci2004223-52819915502272A predictive risk model for outcomes of ischemic strokeJohnstonKCStroke20003124485510657421Trunk performance after stroke: an eye catching predictor of functional outcomeVerheydenGJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2007787694810.1136/jnnp.2006.10164217178824Predicting follow-up living setting in patients with strokeSmithPMArch Phys Med Rehabil20028367647010.1053/apmr.2002.3273612048653Predictors of outcome of rehabilitation of elderly stroke patients in a geriatric wardThommessenBBautz-HolterELaakeKClin Rehabil1999132123810.1191/02692159966650738610348392A model to aid in the prediction of discharge location for stroke rehabilitation patientsAgarwalVArch Phys Med Rehabil200384111703910.1053/S0003-9993(03)00362-914639573Institutionalization after strokePortelliRClin Rehabil20051919710810.1191/0269215505cr822oa15704514Long-term outcome after stroke: does dysphagia matter?SmithardDGSmeetonNCWolfeCDAge Ageing200736190410.1093/ageing/afl14917172601Prognostic factors for ambulation and activities of daily living in the subacute phase after stroke. A systematic review of the literatureMeijerRClin Rehabil20031721192910.1191/0269215503cr585oa12625651Prognostic factors in the subacute phase after stroke for the future residence after six months to one year. A systematic review of the literatureMeijerRClin Rehabil20031755122010.1191/0269215503cr644oa12952157Prognostic social factors in the subacute phase after a stroke for the discharge destination from the hospital stroke-unit. A systematic review of the literatureMeijerRDisabil Rehabil2004264191710.1080/0963828031000163643715164952Predicting disability in stroke--a critical review of the literatureKwakkelGAge Ageing19962564798910.1093/ageing/25.6.4799003886Rahabilitation after stroke; guidelines and recommendations for caregiversRehabilitation C.s.Netherlands Heart Foundation: The Hague2001A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validationCharlsonMEJ Chronic Dis19874053738310.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-83558716The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability studyCollinCInt Disabil Stud19881026133403500Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosisWadeDTHewerRLJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry19875021778210.1136/jnnp.50.2.17710314893572432Reliability of the Modified Motor Assessment Scale and the Barthel IndexLoewenSCAndersonBAPhys Ther19886871077813387463Dutch interview version of the Barthel Index evaluated in patients with spinal cord injuriesPostMWNed Tijdschr Geneeskd1995139271376807617060An activities index for use with stroke patientsHolbrookMSkilbeckCEAge Ageing19831221667010.1093/ageing/12.2.1666869117Inter-rater reliability of the Frenchay activities index in patients with stroke and their careersPiercyMClin Rehabil20001444334010.1191/0269215500cr327oa10945428Good inter-rater reliability of the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patientsPostMWde WitteLPClin Rehabil20031755485210.1191/0269215503cr648oa12952162Differences between patient and proxy reports in the assessment of disability after strokeChenMHClin Rehabil2007214351610.1177/026921550707254417613576Determining functional/health status and its relation to disability in stroke survivorsSegalMESchallRRStroke19942512239177974578Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three monthsHellerAJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1987506714910.1136/jnnp.50.6.71410320763612152Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegiaDemeurisseGDemolORobayeEEur Neurol1980196382910.1159/0001151787439211Criterion validity of lower extremity Motricity Index scoresCameronDBohannonRWClin Rehabil20001422081110763800Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability studyCollinCWadeDJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1990537576910.1136/jnnp.53.7.5764881332391521The Arm Motor Ability Test: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily livingKoppBArch Phys Med Rehabil19977866152010.1016/S0003-9993(97)90427-59196469The Trunk Impairment Scale: a new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after strokeVerheydenGClin Rehabil20041833263410.1191/0269215504cr733oa15137564Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrumentBergKOCan J Public Health199283Suppl 2S7111468055Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patientsMaoHFStroke20023341022710.1161/01.STR.0000012516.63191.C511935055Standing balance during internally produced perturbations in subjects with hemiplegia: validation of the balance scaleStevensonTJGarlandSJArch Phys Med Rehabil19967776566210.1016/S0003-9993(96)90004-08669991Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic reviewBlumLKorner-BitenskyNPhys Ther20088855596618292215The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute strokeBergKWood-DauphineeSWilliamsJIScand J Rehabil Med199527127367792547Physical, mental, and social predictors of functional outcome in unilateral lower-limb amputeesSchoppenTArch Phys Med Rehabil20038468031110.1016/S0003-9993(02)04952-312808530Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulnessHoldenMKPhys Ther198464135406691052The responsiveness of the ten-meter walking test and other measures in patients with hemiparesis in the acute phaseVos-VromansDCPhysiother Theory Pract20052131738010.1080/0959398050021292016389698Responsiveness and predictability of gait speed and other disability measures in acute strokeSalbachNMArch Phys Med Rehabil200182912041210.1053/apmr.2001.2490711552192Hemiplegic gait after stroke: is measurement of maximum speed required?KollenBKwakkelGLindemanEArch Phys Med Rehabil20068733586310.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.00716500169"Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinicianFolsteinMFFolsteinSEMcHughPRJ Psychiatr Res19751231899810.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-61202204The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive reviewTombaughTNMcIntyreNJJ Am Geriatr Soc1992409922351512391Changes in Mini Mental State Examination score after stroke: lacunar infarction predicts cognitive declineAppelrosPAnderssonAGEur J Neurol2006135491510.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01299.x16722974Development of the Stroke-unit Discharge Guideline: choice of assessment instruments for prediction in the subacute phase post-strokeMeijerRvan LimbeekJde HaanRInt J Rehabil Res20062911810.1097/01.mrr.0000175269.59788.4116432383Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglectWilsonBCockburnJHalliganPArch Phys Med Rehabil1987682981023813864Visuospatial asymmetry and non-spatial attention in subacute stroke patients with and without neglectvan KesselMECortex201046560261210.1016/j.cortex.2009.06.00419591978Neglect in elderly stroke patients: a comparison of five testsAgrellBMDehlinOIDahlgrenCJPsychiatry Clin Neurosci199751529530010.1111/j.1440-1819.1997.tb03201.x9413876Evaluation of a test battery for hemineglect in elderly stroke patients for use by therapists in clinical practiceBaileyMJRiddochMJCromePNeuroRehabilitation200014313915011455076How to detect visual neglect in acute strokeJehkonenMLancet19983519104727810.1016/S0140-6736(05)78497-X9504525A diagnostic test for apraxia in stroke patients: internal consistency and diagnostic valuevan HeugtenCMClin Neuropsychol19991321829210949159Assessment of apraxia: inter-rater reliability of a new apraxia test, association between apraxia and other cognitive deficits and prevalence of apraxia in a rehabilitation settingZwinkelsAClin Rehabil20041878192710.1191/0269215504cr816oa15573839The Aachen Aphasia TestHuberWPoeckKWillmesKAdv Neurol1984422913036209953Measurements of aphasic disorders. A brief description of the SAN-batteryDeelmanBGGerontologie198011117217399336The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementiaCummingsJLNeurology199444122308147991117Development of neuropsychiatric symptoms in poststroke patients: a cross-sectional studyAngelelliPActa Psychiatr Scand20041101556310.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00297.x15180780Depression or apathy and functional recovery after strokeHamaSInt J Geriatr Psychiatry2007221010465110.1002/gps.186617702056Construction and validation of a patient- and user-friendly nursing home version of the Geriatric Depression ScaleJongenelisKInt J Geriatr Psychiatry20072298374210.1002/gps.174817199236The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0HaysRDSherbourneCDMazelRMHealth Econ1993232172710.1002/hec.47300203058275167RAND 36-item Health Survey scoring instructionsRAND1992http://www.rand.org/health/surveys_tools/mos/mos_core_36item.htmlPsychometric qualities of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0: a multidimensional measure of general health statusVanderZeeKIInt J Behav Med1996321042210.1207/s15327558ijbm0302_216250758Functional status assessment in family practice: the Dartmouth COOP Functional Health Assessment Charts/WONCAScholtenJHGWCvLelystadMeditekst1992Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findingsNelsonEJ Chronic Dis198740Suppl 155S69S10.1016/S0021-9681(87)80033-43597698Measuring functional health status with the COOP/WONCA charts, a manualvan WeelCK-ZCTouw-OttenFWMMvan DuijnNPMeyboom-de JongBGroningen1995Stroke caregivers' strain: prevalence and determinants in the first six months after strokeIlseIBDisabil Rehabil20083075233010.1080/0963828070135564518365864Validation of a Caregiver Strain IndexRobinsonBCJ Gerontol198338334486841931A long-term follow-up of stroke patientsWilkinsonPRStroke1997283507129056603Mutuality of the marital relationship in Parkinson's diseaseTanjiHMov Disord200823131843910.1002/mds.2208918759355The relationship between caregiver's strain and social support among mothers with intellectually disabled childrenTsaiSMWangHHJ Clin Nurs20091845394810.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02524.x19192003Oesophageal cancer: caregiver mental health and strainDonnellyMPsychooncology20081712119620110.1002/pon.133718470954A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysisPeduzziPJ Clin Epidemiol199649121373910.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-38970487

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/10/15/prepub