<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art><ui>1471-2156-13-40</ui><ji>1471-2156</ji><fm><dochead>Research article</dochead><bibl><title><p>Genome-wide association study identified three major QTL for carcass weight including the <it>PLAG1-CHCHD7</it> QTN for stature in Japanese Black cattle</p></title><aug><au id="A1"><snm>Nishimura</snm><fnm>Shota</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>shota@siag.or.jp</email></au><au id="A2" pa="yes"><snm>Watanabe</snm><fnm>Toshio</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><insr iid="I5"/><email>toshiow@siag.or.jp</email></au><au id="A3"><snm>Mizoshita</snm><fnm>Kazunori</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>mizosita-kazunori@pref.kagoshima.lg.jp</email></au><au id="A4"><snm>Tatsuda</snm><fnm>Ken</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>Ken_Tatsuda@pref.hyogo.lg.jp</email></au><au id="A5"><snm>Fujita</snm><fnm>Tatsuo</fnm><insr iid="I4"/><email>fujita-tatsuo@pref.oita.lg.jp</email></au><au id="A6"><snm>Watanabe</snm><fnm>Naoto</fnm><insr iid="I4"/><email>watanabe-naoto@pref.oita.lg.jp</email></au><au id="A7"><snm>Sugimoto</snm><fnm>Yoshikazu</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>kazusugi@siag.or.jp</email></au><au id="A8" ca="yes" pa="yes"><snm>Takasuga</snm><fnm>Akiko</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><insr iid="I5"/><email>takasuga@siag.or.jp</email></au></aug><insg><ins id="I1"><p>Shirakawa Institute of Animal Genetics, Japan Livestock Technology Association, Odakura, Nishigo, Fukushima, 961-8061, Japan</p></ins><ins id="I2"><p>Cattle Breeding Development Institute of Kagoshima Prefecture, Osumi, So, Kagoshima, 899-8212, Japan</p></ins><ins id="I3"><p>Hyogo Prefectural Institute of Agriculture, Forestry &amp; Fisheries, Befu, Kasai, Hyogo, 679-0198, Japan</p></ins><ins id="I4"><p>Oita Prefectural Institute of Animal Industry, Kuju, Takeda, Oita, 878-0201, Japan</p></ins><ins id="I5"><p>National Livestock Breeding Center, Odakura, Nishigo, Fukushima, 961-8511, Japan</p></ins></insg><source>BMC Genetics</source><issn>1471-2156</issn><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>40</fpage><url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/13/40</url><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2156-13-40</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">22607022</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><history><rec><date><day>28</day><month>1</month><year>2012</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>20</day><month>5</month><year>2012</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>20</day><month>5</month><year>2012</year></date></pub></history><cpyrt><year>2012</year><collab>Nishimura et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt><kwdg><kwd>GWAS</kwd><kwd>QTL</kwd><kwd>Carcass weight</kwd><kwd>Body size</kwd><kwd>Body weight</kwd><kwd>Growth trait</kwd><kwd>Cattle</kwd></kwdg><abs><sec><st><p>Abstract</p></st><sec><st><p>Background</p></st><p>Significant quantitative trait loci (QTL) for carcass weight were previously mapped on several chromosomes in Japanese Black half-sib families. Two QTL, <it>CW-1</it> and <it>CW</it>-<it>2</it>, were narrowed down to 1.1-Mb and 591-kb regions, respectively. Recent advances in genomic tools allowed us to perform a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in cattle to detect associations in a general population and estimate their effect size. Here, we performed a GWAS for carcass weight using 1156 Japanese Black steers.</p></sec><sec><st><p>Results</p></st><p>Bonferroni-corrected genome-wide significant associations were detected in three chromosomal regions on bovine chromosomes (BTA) 6, 8, and 14. The associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) on BTA 6 were in linkage disequilibrium with the SNP encoding NCAPG Ile442Met, which was previously identified as a candidate quantitative trait nucleotide for <it>CW-2</it>. In contrast, the most highly associated SNP on BTA 14 was located 2.3-Mb centromeric from the previously identified <it>CW-1</it> region. Linkage disequilibrium mapping led to a revision of the <it>CW-1</it> region within a 0.9-Mb interval around the associated SNP, and targeted resequencing followed by association analysis highlighted the quantitative trait nucleotides for bovine stature in the <it>PLAG1-CHCHD7</it> intergenic region. The association on BTA 8 was accounted for by two SNP on the BovineSNP50 BeadChip and corresponded to <it>CW-3</it>, which was simultaneously detected by linkage analyses using half-sib families. The allele substitution effects of <it>CW-1</it>, <it>CW</it>-<it>2</it>, and <it>CW</it>-<it>3</it> were 28.4, 35.3, and 35.0 kg per allele, respectively.</p></sec><sec><st><p>Conclusion</p></st><p>The GWAS revealed the genetic architecture underlying carcass weight variation in Japanese Black cattle in which three major QTL accounted for approximately one-third of the genetic variance.</p></sec></sec></abs></fm><bdy><sec><st><p>Background</p></st><p>Carcass weight is an economically important trait for livestock raised for meat production. Carcass weight is highly correlated with body weight and body size. We previously performed bovine quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using Japanese Black paternal half-sib families and detected significant linkages with carcass weight on bovine chromosome (BTA) 1, 6, 7, 10, and 14 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>. Further analyses of the half-sib QTL revealed a carcass weight QTL on BTA 8. QTL on BTA 14, 6, and 8 were validated in another family and designated <it>CW-1</it><it>CW</it><it>2,</it> and <it>CW</it><it>3</it>, respectively, of which <it>CW-1</it> and <it>CW</it><it>2</it> were narrowed down to 1.1 Mb <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp> and 591 kb <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp>, respectively.</p><p>The recent development of genomic tools such as the BovineSNP50 BeadChip <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr></abbrgrp> allowed us to perform a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in our bovine populations. This approach will improve the resolution of the QTL and enable us to estimate the allele frequency and effect size of a QTL in a given population. Several GWAS using the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chips for bovine growth-related traits have been reported. Snelling et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp> detected the strongest association on BTA 6 and others on BTAs 7, 10, 11, 14, 20, and 23 that reached a Bonferroni-corrected significance level using more than 2500 crossbred beef cattle, although they did not indicate the portion of heritability that could be accounted for by the associated SNP. The association on BTA 6 corresponds to <it>CW-2</it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp> and the orthologous region in humans includes the <it>NCAPG-LCORL</it> region that was identified as one of the loci associated with human adult height <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp>. In bovine, <it>CW-2</it> was associated with body size; including body length, width, and height; and the association with withers height was strongest <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr></abbrgrp>. Pausch et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp> detected a Bonferroni-corrected significant association with body size only on BTA 14 using 1800 bulls of the German Fleckvieh breed. The association also corresponded to the loci for human adult height, including <it>PLAG1, MOS, CHCHD7, RDHE2, RPS20, LYN, TGS1,</it> and <it>PENK</it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp>. They identified a highly significantly associated SNP in a putative polyadenylation signal of <it>RPS20</it>. Karim et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>, however, recently identified causative variations influencing bovine stature in the <it>PLAG1-CHCHD7</it> intergenic region. This QTL also influences body weight and the quantitative trait nucleotides (QTN) modulate the expression of the surrounding genes, including <it>PLAG1</it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>, whose knockout in mice causes dwarfism in the absence of other symptoms <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr></abbrgrp>. The <it>CW-1</it> QTL that we narrowed down <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp> locates approximately 2.5-Mb apart from the variations on <it>RPS20</it> or <it>PLAG1-CHCHD7</it>.</p><p>Here, a GWAS for carcass weight was performed using 1156 Japanese Black steers that were selected preferentially from the tails of the carcass weight distribution of more than 27,500 steers. The strongest association was obtained on BTA14, but not within the <it>CW-1</it> region. The GWAS led us to re-examine the <it>CW-1</it> QTL and identify the <it>PLAG1-CHCHD7</it> QTN for stature <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp> in Japanese Black cattle.</p></sec><sec><st><p>Results</p></st><sec><st><p>GWAS identified three major QTL in Japanese Black</p></st><p>A GWAS was performed using 1156 DNA samples that were selected from more than 27,500 Japanese Black steers. The carcass weight of the selected samples had higher ratios of both extremes than in the collected samples, but was normally distributed (Additional file <supplr sid="S1">1</supplr>). The 39,011 SNP on autosomes that fulfilled the quality control criteria were used for the association analysis. The analysis was performed using EMMAX software <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr></abbrgrp>, which is based on a linear mixed model approach using a genetic relationship matrix estimated by high-density SNP genotypes to model the correlation between the phenotypes of the sample subjects. The approach can adjust for both population stratification and relatedness between samples <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr></abbrgrp>. The genomic inflation factor (&#955;<sub>GC</sub>) was 1.008 in this analysis, indicating that the adjustment of the sample structure of our samples was appropriate. The quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plot with <it>p</it> &lt; 10<sup>-3</sup> revealed large deviations from the distribution under the null hypothesis, indicating that robust associations were obtained (Additional file <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr>). Bonferroni-corrected genome-wide significant associations (<it>p</it> &lt; 1.28 &#215; 10<sup>-6</sup>) were obtained for 19 SNP on 3 chromosomes: 12 on BTA 6, 3 on BTA 8, and 4 on BTA 14 (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>; Additional file <supplr sid="S3">3</supplr>).</p><suppl id="S1"><title><p>Additional file 1</p></title><text><p>Distribution of carcass weight of the animals used for the GWAS. This figure shows the distributions of carcass weight in the collected (blue bars) and the GWAS samples (red bars), respectively. </p></text><file name="1471-2156-13-40-S1.png">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file></suppl><suppl id="S2"><title><p>Additional file 2</p></title><text><p>Quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots of GWAS. The figures show Q-Q plots before (red) and after conditioned analyses (blue).</p></text><file name="1471-2156-13-40-S2.pdf">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file></suppl><suppl id="S3"><title><p>Additional file 3</p></title><text><p>SNP associated with carcass weight. The table shows genome-wide significant SNP.</p></text><file name="1471-2156-13-40-S3.xlsx">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file></suppl><fig id="F1"><title><p>Figure 1</p></title><caption><p>Manhattan plot of GWAS for bovine carcass weight</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Manhattan plot of GWAS for bovine carcass weight.</b> We genotyped 1156 Japanese Black steers with the Illumina Bovine SNP50 BeadChip. The association of SNP with carcass weight was analyzed by a variance component approach using EMMAX software <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr></abbrgrp> with adjustments for age, slaughterhouse, and year as covariates and fixed effects. Blue horizontal line, <it>p</it> = 1.28 &#215; 10<sup>-6</sup>.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2156-13-40-1"/></fig><p>The strongest association was detected with <it>Hapmap46986-BTA-34282</it> (<it>p</it> = 1.03 &#215; 10<sup>-12</sup>) located at 23.5 Mb on BTA 14 (Btau4.0; Figure <figr fid="F2">2A</figr>; Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). This and three other significant SNP located from 23.5 to 26.2 Mb on BTA 14 were in moderate linkage disequilibrium (LD) with linkage disequilibrium coefficients (<it>r</it><sup>2</sup>) ranging from 0.23 to 0.79. The second strongest association was obtained with <it>Hapmap26308-BTC-057761</it> (<it>p</it> = 9.65 &#215; 10<sup>-12</sup>) on BTA 6, which had 11 other significant SNP in the interval (Figure <figr fid="F2">2B</figr>; Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). Eleven SNP, including <it>Hapmap26308-BTC-057761,</it> located within 3.5 Mb from 35.7 to 39.2 Mb and were in strong LD with <it>r</it><sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.65 to 1.00. A residual SNP was 7.9 Mb from them, but in strong LD with the 11 SNP (<it>r</it><sup>2</sup> = 0.62-0.73). An extended LD of this region was also observed in a previous study <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp>, which is probably due to a specific (local) lineage of the <it>Q</it> allele. On BTA 8, 3 SNP locating from 88.7 Mb to 89.4 Mb reached genome-wide significance (Figure <figr fid="F2">2C</figr>). The most significant SNP was <it>BTA-52694-no-rs</it> (<it>p</it> = 4.24 x 10<sup>-9</sup>; Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). In this case, the LD among the 3 SNP was relatively weak with <it>r</it><sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.14 to 0.35.</p><fig id="F2"><title><p>Figure 2</p></title><caption><p>Conditioned analyses</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Conditioned analyses.</b> To examine whether the associations detected on a chromosome were independent, a conditioned analysis was performed by including a genotype of the most significant SNP on the chromosome as a covariate in the model. Red and blue dots represent <it>p</it> values in &#8211;log<sub>10</sub> scale before and after conditioning, respectively. Large squares indicate the most significant SNP in the respective chromosomes. (A) BTA 14. (B) BTA 6. (C1) BTA 8. In BTA 8, <it>Hapmap40466-BTA-82123</it> reached nearly genome-wide significance with conditioning on <it>BTA-52694-no-rs</it> (C1), while the association of <it>BTA-52694-no-r</it> became stronger with conditioning on <it>Hapmap40466-BTA-8212</it> (C2, green dots). When conditioned on both SNP, associations of the surrounding SNP disappeared (C3, orange dots).</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2156-13-40-2"/></fig><table id="T1"><title><p>Table 1</p></title><caption><p><b>Summary of the SNP and haplotypes associated with carcass weight</b></p></caption><tgroup align="left" cols="9"><colspec align="center" colname="c1" colnum="1"/><colspec align="left" colname="c2" colnum="2"/><colspec align="center" colname="c3" colnum="3"/><colspec align="center" colname="c4" colnum="4"/><colspec align="center" colname="c5" colnum="5"/><colspec align="center" colname="c6" colnum="6"/><colspec align="center" colname="c7" colnum="7"/><colspec align="center" colname="c8" colnum="8"/><colspec align="right" colname="c9" colnum="9"/><thead><row><entry colname="c1"><p>Category<sup>1)</sup></p></entry><entry align="left" colname="c2"><p>SNP or Haplotype</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c3"><p>Chr</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c4"><p>Position (Btau4.0)</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c5"><p>Allele substitution effect (kg)</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c6"><p><it>p-</it>value</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c7"><p><it>Q</it> allele</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c8"><p><it>q</it> allele</p></entry><entry colname="c9"><p><it>Q</it> frequency</p></entry></row></thead><tfoot><p><sup>1)</sup>A, SNP on the BovineSNP50 BeadChip that showed the strongest association on a chromosome.</p><p><sup>1)</sup>B, Critical SNP or a haplotype in the associated regions.</p></tfoot><tbody><row><entry align="center" colname="c1"><p>A</p></entry><entry colname="c2"><p><it>Hapmap26308-BTC-057761</it></p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c3"><p>6</p></entry><entry align="right" colname="c4"><p>37,963,147</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c5"><p>35.5</p></entry><entry align="right" colname="c6"><p>9.65E-12</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c7"><p>A</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c8"><p>G</p></entry><entry align="right" colname="c9"><p>0.199</p></entry></row><row><entry colname="c1"/><entry colname="c2"><p><it>BTA-52694-no-rs</it></p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c3"><p>8</p></entry><entry align="right" colname="c4"><p>89,397,242</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c5"><p>26.0</p></entry><entry align="right" colname="c6"><p>4.24E-09</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c7"><p>A</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c8"><p>G</p></entry><entry align="right" colname="c9"><p>0.138</p></entry></row><row><entry colname="c1"/><entry colname="c2"><p><it>Hapmap46986-BTA-34282</it></p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c3"><p>14</p></entry><entry align="right" colname="c4"><p>23,519,449</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c5"><p>27.2</p></entry><entry align="right" colname="c6"><p>1.03E-12</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c7"><p>A</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c8"><p>G</p></entry><entry align="right" colname="c9"><p>0.759</p></entry></row><row><entry align="center" colname="c1"><p>B</p></entry><entry colname="c2"><p><it>NCAPG</it> c.1326T &gt; G</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c3"><p>6</p></entry><entry align="right" colname="c4"><p>38,164,357</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c5"><p>35.3</p></entry><entry align="right" colname="c6"><p>5.28E-12</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c7"><p>G</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c8"><p>T</p></entry><entry align="right" colname="c9"><p>0.200</p></entry></row><row><entry colname="c1"/><entry colname="c2"><p><it>Hapmap40466-BTA-82123</it> and <it>BTA-52694-no-rs</it></p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c3"><p>8</p></entry><entry align="right" colname="c4"><p>-</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c5"><p>35.0</p></entry><entry align="right" colname="c6"><p>8.13E-13</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c7"><p>C-A</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c8"><p>Others</p></entry><entry align="right" colname="c9"><p>0.115</p></entry></row><row><entry colname="c1"/><entry colname="c2"><p><it>FJX_PLAPROTRI</it></p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c3"><p>14</p></entry><entry align="right" colname="c4"><p>23,264,810</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c5"><p>28.4</p></entry><entry align="right" colname="c6"><p>2.84E-14</p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c7"><p>(CCG)<sub>11</sub></p></entry><entry align="center" colname="c8"><p>(CCG)<sub>9</sub></p></entry><entry align="right" colname="c9"><p>0.754</p></entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table><p>We then performed conditioned analyses to examine the independence of the SNP associations. Genotypes of the most associated SNP on each chromosome, <it>Hapmap26308-BTC-057761</it> on BTA 6, <it>BTA-52694-no-rs</it> on BTA 8, and <it>Hapmap46986-BTA-34282</it> on BTA 14, were individually included as a covariate in the mixed model. After conditioning, the associations of the surrounding SNP disappeared (Figure <figr fid="F2">2A</figr>, B), indicating that a single QTL was present in the respective regions. In the case of BTA 8, the <it>p</it> value of <it>Hapmap40466-BTA-82123</it> decreased from 0.216 to 1.31 &#215; 10<sup>-6</sup>, a nearly genome-wide significance level, after conditioning on <it>BTA-52694-no-rs</it>, while <it>BTA-52694-no-rs</it> became much more significant (<it>p</it> = 2.17 &#215; 10<sup>-14</sup>) after conditioning on <it>Hapmap40466-BTA-82123</it>. When conditioned on both <it>BTA-52694-no-rs</it> and <it>Hapmap40466-BTA-82123</it>, the associations of the surrounding SNP disappeared (Figure <figr fid="F2">2C</figr>). This result suggested that a certain haplotype comprising the two SNP represented the QTL on BTA 8 and that a SNP in strong LD with the causative variation of the QTL was not included in the BovineSNP50 BeadChip. When conditioned on the four SNP described above, the Q-Q plot did not deviate from the distribution under the null hypothesis, indicating that no other QTL were detected (Additional file <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr>).</p><p>In our half-sib analyses, we previously detected carcass weight QTL on BTA 14 (<it>CW-1</it>) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>, BTA 6 (<it>CW-2</it>) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp>, and recently on BTA 8 (<it>CW-3</it>; Additional file <supplr sid="S4">4</supplr>). As for <it>CW-2</it>, the SNP encoding NCAPG Ile442Met has been identified as a candidate causative variation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp>. The SNP was located at 38.2 Mb and was in strong LD with <it>Hapmap26308-BTC-057761</it> (<it>r</it><sup>2</sup> = 0.97), indicating that the observed association corresponded to <it>CW-2</it> (Figure <figr fid="F2">2B</figr>; Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). On BTA 8, we detected a carcass weight QTL around 90 cM in two half-sib families (Additional file <supplr sid="S4">4</supplr>), whose sires are father and son and shared a superior <it>Q</it> haplotype (data not shown). Because the <it>Q</it> haplotype of the sires had an A-allele for <it>BTA-52694-no-rs</it> and a C-allele for <it>Hapmap40466-BTA-82123</it>, the haplotypes comprising the two SNP were estimated for the GWAS samples and the association of the <it>Q</it> haplotype was examined (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). The <it>Q</it> haplotype was highly associated with carcass weight (<it>p</it> = 8.13 &#215; 10<sup>-13</sup>), indicating that the association detected on BTA 8 corresponded to <it>CW-3</it>. In contrast, the 1.1-Mb critical region for <it>CW-1</it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp> was 2.3-Mb telomeric from the most strongly associated SNP on BTA 14 in the GWAS. The details are discussed below.</p><suppl id="S4"><title><p>Additional file 4</p></title><text><p><it>F</it>-statistic profiles for carcass weight on BTA 8. This file shows <it>F</it>-statistic profiles for carcass weight on BTA 8 obtained in two QTL analyses. The QTL analyses were performed as described previously <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>. The two sires are father (Sire I) and son (Sire II), and the <it>Q</it> haplotype was inherited by the son from the father (data not shown). Marker locations were obtained from the Shirakawa-USDA linkage map <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr></abbrgrp>. Boxes on the x-axis indicate the 95% confidence interval of the QTL. Horizontal lines indicate the thresholds for chromosome-wise 0.1% (&#8722; &#8722; &#8722;), 1% (&#8722; &#8722;), and 5% (&#8212;&#8211;) significance levels.</p></text><file name="1471-2156-13-40-S4.pdf">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file></suppl></sec><sec><st><p>LD mapping led to a revision of a <it>CW-1</it> critical region</p></st><p>The <it>CW-1</it> QTL was originally mapped between <it>BMS1941</it> and <it>INRA094</it> (24.7-30.9 Mb on Btau4.0) using a Japanese Black half-sib family <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp>, and narrowed down between <it>DIK7012</it> and <it>DIK7020</it> (25.8-26.7 Mb on Btau4.0) by LD mapping <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp>. A subsequent haplotype analysis showed that the six sires segregating a carcass weight QTL around the <it>CW-1</it> locus shared the same <it>Q</it> haplotype between <it>DIK7013</it> and <it>NRKM-040</it> (26.0-26.7 Mb on Btau4.0) with the <it>CW-1</it>-segregating sire <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>, indicating that all seven sires harbored the <it>CW-1</it> QTL. The fact that many sires harbored the <it>CW-1</it> QTL suggested that the QTL was prevalant in the Japanese Black population. Despite this, the most significant SNP on BTA 14 in the GWAS (<it>Hapmap46986-BTA-3428</it> at 23.5 Mb on Btau4.0) was slightly outside of the confidence interval (CI) of <it>CW-1</it> and the conditioned analysis of the GWAS showed only one significant QTL on BTA 14. Thus, we performed haplotype analysis and LD mapping using high-density microsatellites developed around <it>Hapmap46986-BTA-34282</it>, to examine if the observed association was derived from <it>CW-1</it>, and if so, which location <it>CW-1</it> lies in. Haplotypes were examined using the three sires that segregated the <it>CW-1</it> QTL and harbored the same <it>Q</it> but different <it>q</it> (inferior) haplotypes between <it>DIK7013</it> and <it>NRKM-040</it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>. All three sires shared the same <it>Q</it> haplotype spanning more than 1.1 Mb around <it>Hapmap46986-BTA-34282</it> (Additional file <supplr sid="S5">5</supplr>). Therefore, the two identity-by-state (IBS) regions located 2.4-Mb apart on the <it>Q</it> haplotypes of the <it>CW-1</it>-segregating sires, which implied that the observed association was consistent with <it>CW-1</it>. The sires also shared the same <it>q</it> alleles at the two consecutive microsatellites close to <it>Hapmap46986-BTA-34282</it> (Additional file <supplr sid="S5">5</supplr>).</p>
<suppl id="S5"><title><p>Additional file 5</p></title><text><p>Microsatellite markers and haplotypes of the animals used for targeted resequencing. This table shows marker information, such as primer sequences and physical positions, as well as haplotypes of the animals used for targeted resequencing.</p></text><file name="1471-2156-13-40-S5.xlsx">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file></suppl>
<p>Linkage disequilibrium mapping was performed using 142 cattle with heavy carcass weight and 145 cattle with light carcass weight that were selected from the GWAS samples and did not include half-sibs in either group. Also, in the selected samples, <it>Hapmap46986-BTA-34282</it> had the strongest association on BTA 14 (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr><it>upper</it>). The frequency of haplotypes comprising two contiguous microsatellites was estimated in each group and the difference in haplotype frequencies between the groups was tested by Fisher&#8217;s exact test using 2x<it>n</it> or 2x2 contingency tables (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr><it>middle</it>). A stronger association was detected around <it>Hapmap46986-BTA-34282</it> than the previously identified <it>CW-1</it> region in both tests using 2xn and 2x2 contingency tables, respectively, indicating that <it>CW-1</it> did not locate within the previously identified region, but located between <it>DIK7104</it> and <it>DIK7113</it> (22.8-23.7 Mb on Btau4.0; 24.6-25.4 Mb on UMD3.0). The revised <it>CW-1</it> region included both <it>RPS20</it> and <it>PLAG1-CHCHD7</it>, which were previously identified as a locus for body size <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp> and stature <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>, respectively.</p><fig id="F3"><title><p>Figure 3</p></title><caption><p>Linkage disequilibrium mapping of <it>CW-1</it> and association analysis of the candidate QTN screened by targeted resequencing</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Linkage disequilibrium mapping of</b><b><it>CW-1</it></b><b>and association analysis of the candidate QTN screened by targeted resequencing.</b> Of the 1156 steers used for GWAS, 142 with heavy carcass weight and 145 with light carcass weight were used. Also in this population, <it>Hapmap46986-BTA-34282</it> was the most associated on BTA 14 (<it>upper panel</it>). Linkage disequilibrium mapping was performed using high-density microsatellites around <it>Hapmap46986-BTA-34282</it> and the previously identified <it>CW-1</it> region. A haplotype frequency with two contiguous microsatellites was estimated using an expectation-maximization algorithm in each group and differences in haplotype frequencies between the groups were tested by Fisher&#8217;s exact test using a 2x<it>n</it> or a 2x2 contingency table (<it>middle panel</it>). The frequency of the <it>q3</it> haplotype was very low (&lt; 6 alleles in both groups) in some regions, in which the association of the haplotype was not tested. Targeted resequencing was performed on the revised <it>CW-1</it> region. Candidate QTN were obtained as described in the text. An association of candidate QTN with carcass weight was examined using EMMAX software <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr></abbrgrp> (<it>lower panel</it>).</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2156-13-40-3"/></fig></sec><sec><st><p><it>CW-1</it> is identical to the QTN for bovine stature</p></st><p>To identify the causative variation of <it>CW-1</it>, targeted resequencing was performed. The three sires segregating the <it>CW-1</it> QTL, three <it>Q</it>-homozygous sires, and a <it>q</it>-homozygous steer were subjected to sequence capture using a NimbleGen custom array followed by resequencing using Illumina GAIIx (Illumina, San Diego, CA). The <it>Q</it>-homozygous sires were determined as those with at least one <it>Q</it> haplotype within the revised <it>CW-1</it> region and homozygous <it>Q</it> alleles at <it>Hapmap46986-BTA-34282</it> (Additional file <supplr sid="S5">5</supplr>), and did not segregate a carcass weight QTL on BTA 14 in the half-sib analyses using more than 255 offspring per family. The respective GAIIx-reads (40-bp paired-ends) were aligned against both Btau4.0 and UMD3.1 as reference genome sequences, because UMD3.1 includes the largest number of gene annotations among the existing bovine genome assemblies, while information about sequence conservation across species is available on Btau4.0 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr></abbrgrp>. The mean sequence depth of the targeted region was estimated to be 26 to 59 per animal. On UMD3.1, 711 to 1309 putative sequence variations were identified in the <it>CW-1</it>-heterozygous sires. The obtained putative sequence variations were filtered by: (1) heterozygous in the three sires segregating the <it>CW-1</it> QTL, (2) homozygous in the three <it>Q</it>- and the <it>q</it>-homozygous animals, and (3) opposite alleles between the <it>Q</it>- and the <it>q</it>-homozygous animals, resulting in 211 candidate QTN (197 SNP and 14 Indel) on UMD3.1. There were 4 exonic variations, including 1 non-synonymous SNP, while 1 synonymous SNP and 5 SNP in the intergenic regions were within highly conserved segments in mammals (PhastCons score &gt;0.9 on Btau4.0 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr></abbrgrp>). We checked the sequence coverage of the coding regions and the highly conserved regions and confirmed that no other candidate QTN was present in them except for the <it>PLAG1</it><it>CHCHD7</it> intergenic region (see Methods). The same variations (1 SNP and 1 variable number of tandem repeat) as those identified by Karim et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp> were detected in the <it>PLAG1</it><it>CHCHD7</it> intergenic region of the <it>CW-1</it> heterozygous sires, while the SNP in a putative polyadenylation signal of <it>RPS20</it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp> was homozygous in one of the <it>CW-1</it> heterozygous sires (Sire J in Additional file <supplr sid="S5">5</supplr>). Thus, a total of 11 sequence variations were examined for an association with carcass weight (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr><it>lower</it>; Additional file <supplr sid="S6">6</supplr>). The strongest association was obtained for the variations between <it>PLAG1</it> and <it>CHCHD7</it>, strongly suggesting that <it>CW-1</it> was identical to the QTL for bovine stature identified by Karim et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p><suppl id="S6"><title><p>Additional file 6</p></title><text><p>Candidate QTN examined for an association with carcass weight. This table shows the information on sequence variations such as genomic positions, primer sequences, and <it>Q</it> and <it>q</it> alleles in the Japanese Black sires segregating <it>CW-1</it>.</p></text><file name="1471-2156-13-40-S6.xlsx">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file></suppl><p>We compared haplotypes around the QTN for bovine stature between the Japanese Black sires and the F1 (Holstein x Jersey) sires reported by Karim et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>. The <it>Q</it> haplotype of the Japanese Black sires had a mosaic structure of the <it>Q</it> and <it>q</it> haplotypes of the F1 sires, and shared the same <it>Q</it> alleles only at the QTN for stature, <it>FJX_PLAPROTRI</it> and <it>FJX_PLAPROSNP</it> (Additional file <supplr sid="S7">7</supplr>). This observation strongly supports the idea that a crossbreed comparison is a useful way to pinpoint the causative variation for a QTL in bovine <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp> as well as in canine <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p><suppl id="S7"><title><p>Additional file 7</p></title><text><p>Haplotypes of Japanese Black sires. This table shows <it>Q</it> and <it>q</it> alleles in Japanese Black sires around the causative variations for bovine stature.</p></text><file name="1471-2156-13-40-S7.xlsx">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file></suppl></sec><sec><st><p>The three major QTL accounted for one-third of the total genetic variance</p></st><p>Allele frequencies and effect size of the three QTL were examined using <it>FJX_PLAPROTRI</it> (<it>CW-1</it>), <it>NCAPG</it> c.1326T &gt; G (<it>CW-2</it>), and a haplotype comprising <it>Hapmap40466-BTA-82123</it> and <it>BTA-52694-no-rs</it> (<it>CW-3</it>) (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). The <it>Q</it> allele frequency was high for <it>CW-1</it> (75.4%), but low for <it>CW-2</it> (20.0%) and <it>CW-3</it> (11.5%), while allele substitution effects of <it>CW-2</it> and <it>CW</it>-<it>3</it> (35.3 and 35.0 kg/allele) were larger than that of <it>CW-1</it> (28.4 kg/allele). Thus, <it>CW-2</it> and <it>CW</it>-<it>3</it> can be used to efficiently increase carcass weight in the Japanese Black population.</p><p>The fraction of phenotypic variance explained by the empirically estimated relatedness matrix is calculated in EMMAX as pseudoheritability: <inline-formula><m:math name="1471-2156-13-40-i1" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:mrow>
   <m:msup>
      <m:mi>h</m:mi>
      <m:mn>2</m:mn>
   </m:msup>
   <m:mo>=</m:mo>
   <m:msubsup>
      <m:mi>&#963;</m:mi>
      <m:mi>a</m:mi>
      <m:mn>2</m:mn>
   </m:msubsup>
   <m:mo>/</m:mo>
   <m:mfenced open="(" close=")">
      <m:mrow>
         <m:msubsup>
            <m:mi>&#963;</m:mi>
            <m:mi>a</m:mi>
            <m:mn>2</m:mn>
         </m:msubsup>
         <m:mo>+</m:mo>
         <m:msubsup>
            <m:mi>&#963;</m:mi>
            <m:mi>e</m:mi>
            <m:mn>2</m:mn>
         </m:msubsup>
      </m:mrow>
   </m:mfenced>
</m:mrow>
</m:math></inline-formula>. The value was 0.636 and decreased to 0.423 after conditioning on the 3 QTL (<it>FJX_PLAPROTRI</it>, <it>NCAPG</it> c.1326T &gt; G and a haplotype comprising <it>BTA-52694-no-rs</it> and <it>Hapmap40466-BTA-82123</it>), suggesting that the 3 QTL account for one-third [=(0.636-0.423)/0.636] of the total genetic variance of the GWAS samples.</p></sec></sec><sec><st><p>Discussion</p></st><p>We detected three major QTL for carcass weight in a GWAS using Japanese Black cattle. Although these QTL were previously detected using microsatellite-based mapping in half-sib families, the allele frequencies and allele substitution effects of the QTL could be compared in the GWAS. Importantly, these three QTL alone accounted for approximately one-third of the genetic variance. Such information will be useful for marker-assisted selection.</p><p>The GWAS using a large population unexpectedly led us to revise the location of <it>CW-1.</it> The QTL mapping <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp> was originally performed when only a medium-density linkage map was available. The limited number of microsatellites used for the fine-mapping may have caused the incorrect CI. The CI was 10.7 cM, while marker intervals around the QTL region were approximately 8.3 cM <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp>. Once the CI was incorrectly assigned, an IBS region existing in the CI showed the strongest association in the following LD mapping population, and was assigned as a critical region <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp>. To avoid the error, the fine-mapping should have been performed using high-density markers that were evenly distributed along the chromosome, as Karim et al. did <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>. They used 56 microsatellites in the fine-mapping, whose marker-density was more than 3 times the density of ours <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p><p>Re-examination of <it>CW-1</it> strongly suggested that it was identical to the causative variations for bovine stature that were identified by Karim et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>. In their study, the QTL accompanied an effect on weight but not on the ratio of live weight to height <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>, suggesting that the primary effect of <it>CW-1</it> may be on height as observed in <it>CW-2</it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p><p>In both <it>CW-1</it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp> and <it>CW-2</it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr></abbrgrp>, the same QTL mutations were shared among the historically and geographically distant breeds. To our knowledge, there is no documentation of a crossing between a European breed and an ancestor of the Japanese Black sires used in these studies. In <it>CW-1</it>, the <it>Q</it> haplotype of Japanese Black (Additional file <supplr sid="S7">7</supplr>) resembled a Simmental haplotype <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>. A close relationship has not been detected, however, between Japanese Black and a European breed, even using more than 2000 genome-wide SNP <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>. A genome-wide analysis of haplotypes using much higher-density SNP might reveal shared genomic fragments between the Japanese Black and a European breed, and a cryptic genomic influence from a certain breed. Although the origins of the QTN are unknown, it is important that the causative variations are shared among breeds at some QTL. A crossbreed comparison will be able to pinpoint the causative variation if it is shared.</p><p>The <it>CW-1</it> orthologous region in humans has been identified as one of the loci associated with adult height <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp>. The <it>CW-2</it> also corresponds to another height locus, <it>NCAPG-LCORL</it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr></abbrgrp>. Pryce et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp> suggested the consistency between the loci for bovine stature and the loci for human adult height. Therefore <it>CW-3</it> may correspond to another height locus as well. The <it>CW-3</it> region includes many height-associated genes such as <it>C9orf64</it><it>ZCCHC6</it><it>SPIN1, IPPK, PTPDC1, PTCH1/FANCC, ZNF462,</it> and <it>LPAR</it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp>. Targeted resequencing of the <it>CW-3</it> region will be useful to screen the candidate causative variations, as shown in this study.</p><p>So far, 180 loci have been detected that are associated with human adult height but they account for only 10% of the phenotypic variance <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp>. Because heritability is estimated to account for more than 80% of the height variance <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp>, a large fraction of heritability has not been detected. In contrast, only six loci account for more than 70% of the variance in stature across domestic dog breeds <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>. Many of the loci are among the highest F<sub>ST</sub> regions in the dog genome, suggesting that the simple genetic architecture resulted from diversifying selection among breeds for body size <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>. Under artificial selection, a QTL with a large effect such as <it>CW-1</it><it>CW2</it>, and <it>CW</it><it>3</it>, may be easily fixed. Previous reports showed that the <it>Q</it> frequencies of the stature QTL (<it>CW-1</it>) and <it>NCAPG</it> c.1326T &gt; G (<it>CW-2</it>) differed substantially in P<sub>0</sub> animals between Holstein-Friesian and Jersey <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp> and between Charolais and German Holstein <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr></abbrgrp>, respectively. In contrast, Japanese Black has three QTL at different frequencies. In Japanese Black, mean carcass weight was recently improved, while a line with a relatively small body size remains locally. This may explain the wide distribution of carcass weight in this breed (Additional file <supplr sid="S1">1</supplr>; 300&#8211;700 kg) and the presence of the three QTL with large effects. The line is known to produce highly marbled beef, but the <it>Q</it> alleles of the three QTL were not significantly associated with marbling (<it>p</it> &gt;0.01). Therefore, the small carcass weight of the line can be improved by selection (<it>CW-1</it>) or introgression of the <it>Q</it> alleles (<it>CW-2</it> and <it>CW-3</it>) without affecting marbling. This study revealed a genetic architecture underlying carcass weight variations in Japanese Black cattle and provides useful information for breeding.</p></sec><sec><st><p>Conclusions</p></st><p>Genome-wide association analysis of Japanese Black cattle identified three major QTL for carcass weight. A detailed examination of the association on BTA 14 led to a revision of the <it>CW-1</it> region and strongly suggested that it was identical to the causative variations in the <it>PLAG1-CHCHD7</it> intergenic region for bovine stature <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>. The three QTL with various frequencies accounted for approximately one-third of the total heritability, indicating a possibility of efficiently increasing carcass weight using marker-assisted selection.</p></sec><sec><st><p>Methods</p></st><sec><st><p>Ethics statement</p></st><p>This research was undertaken with the approval of the Shirakawa Institute of Animal Genetics Committee on Animal Research (H21-1).</p></sec><sec><st><p>Collection of DNA samples and phenotype data</p></st><p>Perirenal fat tissues of more than 27,500 Japanese Black steers were collected at two slaughterhouses from 2000 to 2008. The cattle were reared in different herds throughout Japan. Carcass traits such as cold carcass weight and marbling were systematically measured by certified graders and recorded at slaughterhouses. Sire DNA used to analyze the <it>CW-1</it> region was obtained as semen.</p></sec><sec><st><p>Selection of DNA samples for GWAS</p></st><p>First, animals were selected from the 15% extremes of the cold carcass weight distribution that did not include a half-sib in each extreme, resulting in 199 steers for heavy carcass weight and 299 steers for light carcass weight. Then, 658 steers that had been selected from both extremes for marbling and genotyped using the BovineSNP50 BeadChip (Illumina) were added to increase the sample numbers. The 658 steers included half-sibs and distributed from heavy to light carcass weight. The resulting population comprised 1156 steers with a normally distributed carcass weight (Additional file <supplr sid="S1">1</supplr>). The 1156 steers were the offspring of 347 sires and included at most 20 half-sibs.</p></sec><sec><st><p>GWAS for carcass weight</p></st><p>The 1156 DNA samples were genotyped using the BovineSNP50 BeadChip (Illumina). The Btau4.0 assembly <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp> was used to map the position of the SNP. Genotyping call rates were more than 95% in all samples. Among 54,001 SNP on the BovineSNP50 BeadChip, 39,011 SNP on autosomes fulfilled our quality control criteria: (1) call rate greater than 95%, (2) minor allele frequency greater than 0.01, and (3) p-value of a chi-square test for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium greater than 0.001.</p><p>An association analysis was performed using EMMAX software <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr></abbrgrp> based on a linear mixed model with genomic related matrix. This software performs three-step analysis. First, the n &#215; n genetic relatedness matrix of IBS between individuals is calculated using high-density SNP genotype data. Second, it uses a variance component model to estimate the restricted maximum likelihood parameters.</p><p><display-formula id="M1"><m:math name="1471-2156-13-40-i2" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:mrow>
   <m:mi>V</m:mi>
   <m:mi>a</m:mi>
   <m:mi>r</m:mi>
   <m:mfenced open="(" close=")">
      <m:mi>Y</m:mi>
   </m:mfenced>
   <m:mo>=</m:mo>
   <m:msubsup>
      <m:mi>&#963;</m:mi>
      <m:mi>a</m:mi>
      <m:mn>2</m:mn>
   </m:msubsup>
   <m:msub>
      <m:mover accent="true">
         <m:mi>S</m:mi>
         <m:mo>^</m:mo>
      </m:mover>
      <m:mi>N</m:mi>
   </m:msub>
   <m:mo>+</m:mo>
   <m:msubsup>
      <m:mi>&#963;</m:mi>
      <m:mi>e</m:mi>
      <m:mn>2</m:mn>
   </m:msubsup>
   <m:mi>I</m:mi>
</m:mrow>
</m:math></display-formula></p><p>where <it>Var</it>(<it>Y</it>) is the variance of phenotype, <it>&#963;</it><sub><it>a</it></sub><sup>2</sup> is the additive genetic variance, <inline-formula><m:math name="1471-2156-13-40-i3" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:msub>
   <m:mover accent="true">
      <m:mi>S</m:mi>
      <m:mo>^</m:mo>
   </m:mover>
   <m:mi>N</m:mi>
</m:msub>
</m:math></inline-formula> is the n &#215; n normalized genetic relatedness matrix, <it>&#963;</it><sub><it>e</it></sub><sup>2</sup> is random environmental variance, and <it>I</it> is an identity matrix.</p><p>Third, a generalized least squares <it>F</it>-test for each marker was performed to detect associations accounting for the sample structure using the genetic relatedness matrix</p><p><display-formula id="M2"><m:math name="1471-2156-13-40-i4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:mrow>
   <m:msub>
      <m:mi>y</m:mi>
      <m:mi>i</m:mi>
   </m:msub>
   <m:mo>=</m:mo>
   <m:msub>
      <m:mi>&#946;</m:mi>
      <m:mn>0</m:mn>
   </m:msub>
   <m:mo>+</m:mo>
   <m:msub>
      <m:mi>&#946;</m:mi>
      <m:mi>k</m:mi>
   </m:msub>
   <m:msub>
      <m:mi>X</m:mi>
      <m:mi mathvariant="italic">ik</m:mi>
   </m:msub>
   <m:mo>+</m:mo>
   <m:msub>
      <m:mi>&#951;</m:mi>
      <m:mi>i</m:mi>
   </m:msub>
   <m:mspace width="2.5em"/>
   <m:mi>V</m:mi>
   <m:mi>a</m:mi>
   <m:mi>r</m:mi>
   <m:mfenced open="(" close=")">
      <m:mi>&#951;</m:mi>
   </m:mfenced>
   <m:mo>=</m:mo>
   <m:mi>V</m:mi>
   <m:mo>&#8733;</m:mo>
   <m:msubsup>
      <m:mi>&#963;</m:mi>
      <m:mrow>
         <m:mover accent="true">
            <m:mi>a</m:mi>
            <m:mo>^</m:mo>
         </m:mover>
      </m:mrow>
      <m:mn>2</m:mn>
   </m:msubsup>
   <m:msub>
      <m:mover accent="true">
         <m:mi>S</m:mi>
         <m:mo>^</m:mo>
      </m:mover>
      <m:mi>N</m:mi>
   </m:msub>
   <m:mo>+</m:mo>
   <m:msubsup>
      <m:mi>&#963;</m:mi>
      <m:mrow>
         <m:mover accent="true">
            <m:mi>e</m:mi>
            <m:mo>^</m:mo>
         </m:mover>
      </m:mrow>
      <m:mn>2</m:mn>
   </m:msubsup>
   <m:mi>I</m:mi>
</m:mrow>
</m:math></display-formula></p><p>where <it>y</it><sub><it>i</it></sub> is the phenotypic value of an individual <it>i</it><it>&#946;</it><sub><it>0</it></sub> is the fixed effect composed of age (month), slaughter year, and slaughterhouse to adjust the environmental effect, <it>&#946;</it><sub><it>k</it></sub> is the effect size of marker <it>k</it><it>X</it><sub><it>ik</it></sub> is the minor allele counts of marker <it>k</it> of individual <it>i</it>, and <it>&#951;</it><sub>i</sub> is the error term that includes the genetic relatedness matrix. In a conditioned analysis, the genotypes of SNP associated with carcass weight were included as covariates. Haploview <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr></abbrgrp> was used to analyze LD among the SNP.</p></sec><sec><st><p>QTL mapping of <it>CW-3</it></p></st><p>The genome screen was conducted using the microsatellite markers on the Shirakawa-USDA linkage map <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr></abbrgrp>. QTL analyses were performed with the interval mapping method using a linear regression model for half-sib families <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B28">28</abbr><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr></abbrgrp>, as described previously <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp>. Linear regression analysis was performed using the following model:</p><p><display-formula id="M3"><m:math name="1471-2156-13-40-i5" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:mrow>
   <m:mi>y</m:mi>
   <m:mo>=</m:mo>
   <m:mi>X</m:mi>
   <m:mi>b</m:mi>
   <m:mo>+</m:mo>
   <m:mi>e</m:mi>
   <m:mtext>,</m:mtext>
</m:mrow>
</m:math></display-formula></p><p>where <it>y</it> is the vector of phenotypic value, <it>X</it> is the design matrix of fixed effects composed of slaughter year, age (day), and probability of having the <it>Q</it> phase at a given location (<it>Prob(Q)</it>), <it>b</it> is the vector of fixed effects, and <it>e</it> is the residual error. <it>b</it> was estimated by the least squares method. An <it>F</it>-statistic value at each position was calculated from the residual sum square regressed with <it>Prob(Q)</it>, and the total residual sum square without <it>Prob(Q)</it>. The analysis was performed at 2-cM intervals along each chromosome. A threshold for significance of the <it>F</it>-statistic value was obtained by 10,000 random permutations of the phenotypic data <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr></abbrgrp>. The 95% CI of the QTL locations was calculated using the bootstrapping method <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr></abbrgrp>. Briefly, a set of offspring was chosen so as to be the same number as the original half-sibs by resampling from the original half-sibs. Resampling was repeated 10,000 times. The position of the <it>F</it>-statistic peak in each bootstrapping was collected. The CI was determined based on the distribution of the peaks. Therefore, the CI may be fragmented into separated regions, and not a single contiguous region.</p><p>The sires and a <it>Q</it>-homozygous steer were genotyped using a BovineHD BeadChip (Illumina) that includes <it>BTA-52694-no-rs.</it> The SNP <it>Hapmap40466-BTA-82123</it> was genotyped by direct sequencing of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products using BigDye Terminator v.3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) followed by electrophoresis using an ABI 3730 sequencer (Applied Biosystems).</p></sec><sec><st><p>Microsatellite development and genotyping</p></st><p>Microsatellites were searched for in the genomic sequences and the primers were designed using Primer 3 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr></abbrgrp>. Seventeen microsatellite markers from <it>DIK7100</it> to <it>DIK7116</it> were developed in this study. Marker information, such as primer sequences and genomic positions, is shown in Additional file <supplr sid="S5">5</supplr>. Genotyping was performed using PCR with a fluorescent-labeled reverse primer, followed by electrophoresis using ABI 3730 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems) and analysis using GeneMapper software (Applied Biosystems). The sires and their offspring were genotyped to determine the phase of the sires&#8217; chromosomes. The haplotypes of the animals used for targeted resequencing are also shown in Additional file <supplr sid="S5">5</supplr>.</p></sec><sec><st><p>Linkage disequilibrium mapping</p></st><p>Linkage disequilibrium mapping was performed using 142 heavy carcass weight cattle and 145 light carcass weight cattle that were selected from the GWAS samples and did not include half-sibs in each group. A haplotype frequency comprising two contiguous microsatellites was estimated using an expectation-maximization algorithm in each group and the difference in haplotype frequencies between the groups was tested by Fisher&#8217;s exact test using a 2x<it>n</it> contingency table. The association of each haplotype of the three sires segregating the <it>CW-1</it> QTL was also tested by Fisher&#8217;s exact test using a 2x2 contingency table. The frequency of <it>q3</it> haplotypeAdditional file ( <supplr sid="S5">5</supplr>) was very low (&lt; 6 alleles in both groups) in some regions, where an association of the haplotype was not tested.</p></sec><sec><st><p>Targeted resequencing</p></st><p>Three sires segregating the QTL, three <it>Q</it>-homozygous sires, and a <it>q</it>-homozygous steer (Additional file <supplr sid="S5">5</supplr>) were subjected to sequence capture (NimbleGen custom array) followed by resequencing (Illumina GAIIx, 40-bp paired-end run). The <it>Q</it>-homozygous sires were determined as those that harbored at least one <it>Q</it> haplotype and homozygous <it>Q</it> alleles at <it>Hapmap46986-BTA-34282</it> and did not segregate a carcass weight QTL on BTA 14 in the half-sib analyses using more than 255 offspring per family. The revised <it>CW-1</it> region including 22.8-23.7 Mb on Btau4.0 and 24.5-25.5 Mb on UMD3.0 was targeted. Alignment and variant detection were performed using Illumina pipeline (CASAVA 1.7). As a reference genome assembly, UMD3.1 was used to identify variants in coding regions, while Btau4.0 was used to search variants in conserved segments across mammalian species. PhastCons scores were downloaded from the University of California, Santa Cruz web site <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr></abbrgrp>. Obtained putative sequence variations were filtered by: (1) heterozygous in the three sires segregating the <it>CW-1</it> QTL, (2) homozygous in the three <it>Q</it>- and the <it>q</it>-homozygous animals, and (3) opposite alleles between the <it>Q</it>- and the <it>q</it>-homozygous animals.</p><p>Coverage of the coding regions (UMD3.1) and highly conserved regions (PhastCons &gt; 0.9, Btau4.0) was checked in each animal. The region between <it>PLAG1</it> and <it>CHCHD7</it> was not covered in every animal. Although the region was difficult to amplify by PCR, we detected the variations in heterozygous sires reported by Karim et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>. Ten nucleotides in the 3&#8217;UTR of <it>TMEM68</it> were not covered only in the <it>q</it>-homozygous animal and were sequenced using an ABI 3730 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Other coding regions and highly conserved regions were covered in every animal. Regions with fewer than 4 reads in either of the animals were confirmed to have no sequence variations between the <it>q</it>-homozygous and a <it>Q</it>-homozygous animal.</p></sec><sec><st><p>Association analysis of candidate QTN with bovine carcass weight</p></st><p>Sequence variations were genotyped using the same population used for the LD mapping. The SNP were genotyped by direct sequencing of the PCR products, while the Indel and variable number of tandem repeat were amplified using a fluorescent-labeled reverse primer and genotyped in the same way as a microsatellite marker. The information, such as genomic positions, primer sequences, and alleles, is shown in Additional file <supplr sid="S6">6</supplr>. The genotypes were combined with the genotypes determined using a Bovine SNP50 BeadChip. Mixed-model association analysis was performed using EMMAX <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr></abbrgrp>, adjusting for age, slaughterhouse, and year as covariate and fixed effects.</p></sec><sec><st><p>Estimation of effect size of the QTL</p></st><p>Genotypes of <it>FJX_PLAPROTRI</it> and <it>NCAPG</it> c.1326T &gt; G, and a <it>Q</it> haplotype comprising <it>Hapmap40466-BTA-82123</it> and <it>BTA-52694-no-rs</it> were used to estimate the effect size of <it>CW-1</it><it>CW</it><it>2,</it> and <it>CW</it><it>3</it>, respectively. The 1156 GWAS samples were genotyped with <it>FJX_PLAPROTRI</it> (Additional file <supplr sid="S6">6</supplr>) and <it>NCAPG</it> c.1326T &gt; G <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp>. A <it>Q</it> haplotype of <it>CW-3</it> was determined using the sires segregating the QTL (Additional file <supplr sid="S5">5</supplr>) and diplotypes of the GWAS samples were estimated using fastPhase <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr></abbrgrp>. The calculation was performed using EMMAX including a number of the <it>Q</it> alleles or haplotypes (0, 1, and 2) as <it>X</it><sub><it>ik</it></sub> in the model.</p></sec></sec><sec><st><p>Abbreviations</p></st><p>QTL: Quantitative trait locus or loci; GWAS: Genome-wide association study; BTA: Bovine chromosome(s); SNP: Single nucleotide polymorphism(s); QTN: Quantitative trait nucleotide(s); LD: Linkage disequilibrium; Q-Q: Quantile-quantile; IBS: Identity-by-state; CI: Confidence interval; PCR: Polymerase chain reaction.</p></sec><sec><st><p>Competing interests</p></st><p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p></sec><sec><st><p>Authors&#8217; contributions</p></st><p>SN and TW performed the statistical analyses. KM and KT contributed in the reanalysis of the <it>CW-1</it> region. TF and NW mapped <it>CW-3</it> in half-sib QTL analyses. YS coordinated the study and helped draft the manuscript. AT designed the study and performed targeted resequencing. AT and SN drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p></sec></bdy><bm><ack><sec><st><p>Acknowledgements</p></st><p>The authors thank Y. Kaneuchi and M. Komatsu for technical assistance. The work was partly supported by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishery, Japan, and by the Japan Racing and Livestock Promotion Foundation.</p></sec></ack><refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>Identification of bovine QTL for growth and carcass traits in Japanese Black cattle by replication and identical-by-descent mapping</p></title><aug><au><snm>Takasuga</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Watanabe</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Mizoguchi</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Hirano</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Ihara</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Takano</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Yokouchi</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Fujikawa</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Chiba</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Kobayashi</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Tatsuda</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Oe</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Furukawa-Kuroiwa</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Nishimura-Abe</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Fujita</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Inoue</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Mizoshita</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Ogino</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Sugimoto</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au></aug><source>Mamm Genome</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>18</volume><fpage>125</fpage><lpage>136</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00335-006-0096-5</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17347893</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>Identification of a 1.1-Mb region for a carcass weight QTL on bovine Chromosome 14</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mizoshita</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Takano</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Watanabe</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Takasuga</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Sugimoto</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au></aug><source>Mamm Genome</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>532</fpage><lpage>537</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00335-005-0024-0</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16151698</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Cross-breed comparisons identified a critical 591-kb region for bovine carcass weight QTL (CW-2) on chromosome 6 and the Ile-442-Met substitution in NCAPG as a positional candidate</p></title><aug><au><snm>Setoguchi</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Furuta</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Hirano</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Nagao</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Watanabe</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Sugimoto</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Takasuga</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>BMC Genet</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>4</volume><fpage>10</fpage><lpage>43</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>Development and characterization of a high density SNP genotyping assay for cattle</p></title><aug><au><snm>Matukumalli</snm><fnm>LK</fnm></au><au><snm>Lawley</snm><fnm>CT</fnm></au><au><snm>Schnabel</snm><fnm>RD</fnm></au><au><snm>Taylor</snm><fnm>JF</fnm></au><au><snm>Allan</snm><fnm>MF</fnm></au><au><snm>Heaton</snm><fnm>MP</fnm></au><au><snm>O&apos;Connell</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Moore</snm><fnm>SS</fnm></au><au><snm>Smith</snm><fnm>TP</fnm></au><au><snm>Sonstegard</snm><fnm>TS</fnm></au><au><snm>Van Tassell</snm><fnm>CP</fnm></au></aug><source>PLoS One</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>4</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0005361</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Genome-wide association study of growth in crossbred beef cattle</p></title><aug><au><snm>Snelling</snm><fnm>WM</fnm></au><au><snm>Allan</snm><fnm>MF</fnm></au><au><snm>Keele</snm><fnm>JW</fnm></au><au><snm>Kuehn</snm><fnm>LA</fnm></au><au><snm>McDaneld</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Smith</snm><fnm>TP</fnm></au><au><snm>Sonstegard</snm><fnm>TS</fnm></au><au><snm>Thallman</snm><fnm>RM</fnm></au><au><snm>Bennett</snm><fnm>GL</fnm></au></aug><source>J Anim Sci</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>88</volume><fpage>837</fpage><lpage>848</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.2527/jas.2009-2257</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19966163</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>Genome-wide association analysis identifies 20 loci that influence adult height</p></title><aug><au><snm>Weedon</snm><fnm>MN</fnm></au><au><snm>Lango</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Lindgren</snm><fnm>CM</fnm></au><au><snm>Wallace</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Evans</snm><fnm>DM</fnm></au><au><snm>Mangino</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Freathy</snm><fnm>RM</fnm></au><au><snm>Perry</snm><fnm>JR</fnm></au><au><snm>Stevens</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Hall</snm><fnm>AS</fnm></au><au><snm>Samani</snm><fnm>NJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Shields</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Prokopenko</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Farrall</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Dominiczak</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Johnson</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Bergmann</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Beckmann</snm><fnm>JS</fnm></au><au><snm>Vollenweider</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Waterworth</snm><fnm>DM</fnm></au><au><snm>Mooser</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Palmer</snm><fnm>CN</fnm></au><au><snm>Morris</snm><fnm>AD</fnm></au><au><snm>Ouwehand</snm><fnm>WH</fnm></au><au><snm>Cambridge GEM</snm><fnm>Consortium</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhao</snm><fnm>JH</fnm></au><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Loos</snm><fnm>RJ</fnm></au><au><cnm>Diabetes Genetics Initiative; Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium</cnm></au><etal/></aug><source>Nat Genet</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>40</volume><fpage>575</fpage><lpage>583</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/ng.121</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2681221</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18391952</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Many sequence variants affecting diversity of adult human height</p></title><aug><au><snm>Gudbjartsson</snm><fnm>DF</fnm></au><au><snm>Walters</snm><fnm>GB</fnm></au><au><snm>Thorleifsson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Stefansson</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Halldorsson</snm><fnm>BV</fnm></au><au><snm>Zusmanovich</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Sulem</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Thorlacius</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Gylfason</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Steinberg</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Helgadottir</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Ingason</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Steinthorsdottir</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Olafsdottir</snm><fnm>EJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Olafsdottir</snm><fnm>GH</fnm></au><au><snm>Jonsson</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Borch-Johnsen</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Hansen</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Andersen</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Jorgensen</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Pedersen</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Aben</snm><fnm>KK</fnm></au><au><snm>Witjes</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au><au><snm>Swinkels</snm><fnm>DW</fnm></au><au><snm>den Heijer</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Franke</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Verbeek</snm><fnm>AL</fnm></au><au><snm>Becker</snm><fnm>DM</fnm></au><au><snm>Yanek</snm><fnm>LR</fnm></au><au><snm>Becker</snm><fnm>LC</fnm></au><etal/></aug><source>Nat Genet</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>40</volume><fpage>609</fpage><lpage>615</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/ng.122</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18391951</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>The SNP c.1326T>G in the non-SMC condensin I complex, subunit G (NCAPG) gene encoding a p.Ile442Met variant is associated with an increase in body frame size at puberty in cattle</p></title><aug><au><snm>Setoguchi</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Watanabe</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Weikard</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Albrecht</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>K&#252;hn</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Kinoshita</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Sugimoto</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Takasuga</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Anim Genet</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>42</volume><fpage>650</fpage><lpage>655</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02196.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">22035007</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>Genome-wide association study identifies two major loci affecting calving ease and growth-related traits in cattle</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pausch</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Flisikowski</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Jung</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Emmerling</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Edel</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>G&#246;tz</snm><fnm>KU</fnm></au><au><snm>Fries</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>187</volume><fpage>289</fpage><lpage>297</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1534/genetics.110.124057</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">3018322</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21059885</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>Identification of ten loci associated with height highlights new biological pathways in human growth</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lettre</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Jackson</snm><fnm>AU</fnm></au><au><snm>Gieger</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Schumacher</snm><fnm>FR</fnm></au><au><snm>Berndt</snm><fnm>SI</fnm></au><au><snm>Sanna</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Eyheramendy</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Voight</snm><fnm>BF</fnm></au><au><snm>Butler</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au><au><snm>Guiducci</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Illig</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Hackett</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Heid</snm><fnm>IM</fnm></au><au><snm>Jacobs</snm><fnm>KB</fnm></au><au><snm>Lyssenko</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Uda</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Boehnke</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Chanock</snm><fnm>SJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Groop</snm><fnm>LC</fnm></au><au><snm>Hu</snm><fnm>FB</fnm></au><au><snm>Isomaa</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Kraft</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Peltonen</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Salomaa</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><cnm>Diabetes Genetics Initiative; FUSION; KORA; Prostate, Lung Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial; Nurses' Health Study; SardiNIA</cnm></au><etal/></aug><source>Nat Genet</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>40</volume><fpage>584</fpage><lpage>591</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/ng.125</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2687076</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18391950</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>Variants modulating the expression of a chromosome domain encompassing PLAG1 influence bovine stature</p></title><aug><au><snm>Karim</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Takeda</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Lin</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Druet</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Arias</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au><au><snm>Baurain</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Cambisano</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Davis</snm><fnm>SR</fnm></au><au><snm>Farnir</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Grisart</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Harris</snm><fnm>BL</fnm></au><au><snm>Keehan</snm><fnm>MD</fnm></au><au><snm>Littlejohn</snm><fnm>MD</fnm></au><au><snm>Spelman</snm><fnm>RJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Georges</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Coppieters</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>Nat Genet</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>43</volume><fpage>405</fpage><lpage>413</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/ng.814</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21516082</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>Targeted disruption of the murine Plag1 proto-oncogene causes growth retardation and reduced fertility</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hensen</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Braem</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Declercq</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Van Dyck</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Dewerchin</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Fiette</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Denef</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Van de Ven</snm><fnm>WJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Dev Growth Differ</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>46</volume><fpage>459</fpage><lpage>470</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1440-169x.2004.00762.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15606491</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kang</snm><fnm>HM</fnm></au><au><snm>Sul</snm><fnm>JH</fnm></au><au><snm>Service</snm><fnm>SK</fnm></au><au><snm>Zaitlen</snm><fnm>NA</fnm></au><au><snm>Kong</snm><fnm>SY</fnm></au><au><snm>Freimer</snm><fnm>NB</fnm></au><au><snm>Sabatti</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Eskin</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>Nat Genet</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>42</volume><fpage>348</fpage><lpage>354</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/ng.548</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">3092069</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20208533</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>New approaches to population stratification in genome-wide association studies</p></title><aug><au><snm>Price</snm><fnm>AL</fnm></au><au><snm>Zaitlen</snm><fnm>NA</fnm></au><au><snm>Reich</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Patterson</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au></aug><source>Nat Rev Genet</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>11</volume><fpage>459</fpage><lpage>463</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">2975875</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20548291</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>Quantitative trait loci analysis for growth and carcass traits in a half-sib family of purebred Japanese Black (Wagyu) cattle</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mizoshita</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Watanabe</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Hayashi</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Kubota</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Yamakuchi</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Todoroki</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Sugimoto</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au></aug><source>J Anim Sci</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>82</volume><fpage>3415</fpage><lpage>3420</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15537759</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>Mapping of quantitative trait loci for carcass traits in a Japanese Black (Wagyu) cattle population</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mizoguchi</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Watanabe</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Fujinaka</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Iwamoto</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Sugimoto</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au></aug><source>Anim Genet</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>37</volume><fpage>51</fpage><lpage>54</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2052.2005.01367.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16441296</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><aug><au><cnm></cnm></au></aug><source>Human (Homo sapiens) Genome Browser Gateway</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><url>http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgGateway</url></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>Efficient mapping of mendelian traits in dogs through genome-wide association</p></title><aug><au><snm>Karlsson</snm><fnm>EK</fnm></au><au><snm>Baranowska</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Wade</snm><fnm>CM</fnm></au><au><snm>Salmon Hillbertz</snm><fnm>NH</fnm></au><au><snm>Zody</snm><fnm>MC</fnm></au><au><snm>Anderson</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Biagi</snm><fnm>TM</fnm></au><au><snm>Patterson</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Pielberg</snm><fnm>GR</fnm></au><au><snm>Kulbokas</snm><fnm>EJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Comstock</snm><fnm>KE</fnm></au><au><snm>Keller</snm><fnm>ET</fnm></au><au><snm>Mesirov</snm><fnm>JP</fnm></au><au><snm>von Euler</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>K&#228;mpe</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Hedhammar</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Lander</snm><fnm>ES</fnm></au><au><snm>Andersson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Andersson</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Lindblad-Toh</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Nat Genet</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>39</volume><fpage>1321</fpage><lpage>1328</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/ng.2007.10</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17906626</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>An assessment of population structure in eight breeds of cattle using a whole genome SNP panel</p></title><aug><au><snm>McKay</snm><fnm>SD</fnm></au><au><snm>Schnabel</snm><fnm>RD</fnm></au><au><snm>Murdoch</snm><fnm>BM</fnm></au><au><snm>Matukumalli</snm><fnm>LK</fnm></au><au><snm>Aerts</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Coppieters</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Crews</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Neto</snm><fnm>ED</fnm></au><au><snm>Gill</snm><fnm>CA</fnm></au><au><snm>Gao</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Mannen</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>Z</fnm></au><au><snm>Van Tassell</snm><fnm>CP</fnm></au><au><snm>Williams</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au><au><snm>Taylor</snm><fnm>JF</fnm></au><au><snm>Moore</snm><fnm>SS</fnm></au></aug><source>BMC Genet</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>9</volume><fpage>37</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">2408608</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18492244</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B20"><title><p>Polymorphic regions affecting human height also control stature in cattle</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pryce</snm><fnm>JE</fnm></au><au><snm>Hayes</snm><fnm>BJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Bolormaa</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Goddard</snm><fnm>ME</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>187</volume><fpage>981</fpage><lpage>984</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1534/genetics.110.123943</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">3048786</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21212230</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p>Hundreds of variants clustered in genomic loci and biological pathways affect human height</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lango Allen</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Estrada</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Lettre</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Berndt</snm><fnm>SI</fnm></au><au><snm>Weedon</snm><fnm>MN</fnm></au><au><snm>Rivadeneira</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Willer</snm><fnm>CJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Jackson</snm><fnm>AU</fnm></au><au><snm>Vedantam</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Raychaudhuri</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Ferreira</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Wood</snm><fnm>AR</fnm></au><au><snm>Weyant</snm><fnm>RJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Segr&#232;</snm><fnm>AV</fnm></au><au><snm>Speliotes</snm><fnm>EK</fnm></au><au><snm>Wheeler</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Soranzo</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Park</snm><fnm>JH</fnm></au><au><snm>Yang</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Gudbjartsson</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Heard-Costa</snm><fnm>NL</fnm></au><au><snm>Randall</snm><fnm>JC</fnm></au><au><snm>Qi</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Vernon Smith</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>M&#228;gi</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Pastinen</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Liang</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Heid</snm><fnm>IM</fnm></au><au><snm>Luan</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Thorleifsson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><etal/></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>467</volume><fpage>832</fpage><lpage>838</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nature09410</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2955183</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20881960</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B22"><title><p>Assumption-free estimation of heritability from genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing between full siblings</p></title><aug><au><snm>Visscher</snm><fnm>PM</fnm></au><au><snm>Medland</snm><fnm>SE</fnm></au><au><snm>Ferreira</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au><au><snm>Morley</snm><fnm>KI</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhu</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Cornes</snm><fnm>BK</fnm></au><au><snm>Montgomery</snm><fnm>GW</fnm></au><au><snm>Martin</snm><fnm>NG</fnm></au></aug><source>PLoS Genet</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>2</volume><fpage>e41</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1371/journal.pgen.0020041</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1413498</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16565746</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B23"><title><p>A simple genetic architecture underlies morphological variation in dogs</p></title><aug><au><snm>Boyko</snm><fnm>AR</fnm></au><au><snm>Quignon</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Schoenebeck</snm><fnm>JJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Degenhardt</snm><fnm>JD</fnm></au><au><snm>Lohmueller</snm><fnm>KE</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhao</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Brisbin</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Parker</snm><fnm>HG</fnm></au><au><snm>von Holdt</snm><fnm>BM</fnm></au><au><snm>Cargill</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Auton</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Reynolds</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Elkahloun</snm><fnm>AG</fnm></au><au><snm>Castelhano</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Mosher</snm><fnm>DS</fnm></au><au><snm>Sutter</snm><fnm>NB</fnm></au><au><snm>Johnson</snm><fnm>GS</fnm></au><au><snm>Novembre</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Hubisz</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Siepel</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Wayne</snm><fnm>RK</fnm></au><au><snm>Bustamante</snm><fnm>CD</fnm></au><au><snm>Ostrander</snm><fnm>EA</fnm></au></aug><source>PLoS Biol</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>8</volume><fpage>e1000451</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1371/journal.pbio.1000451</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2919785</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20711490</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B24"><title><p>Dissection of Genetic Factors Modulating Fetal Growth in Cattle Indicates a Substantial Role of the Non-SMC Condensin I Complex, Subunit G (NCAPG) Gene</p></title><aug><au><snm>Eberlein</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Takasuga</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Setoguchi</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Pfuhl</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Flisikowski</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Fries</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Klopp</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>F&#252;rbass</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Weikard</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>K&#252;hn</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>183</volume><fpage>951</fpage><lpage>964</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1534/genetics.109.106476</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2778990</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19720859</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B25"><aug><au><cnm>Baylor College of Medicine, Human Genome Sequencing Center</cnm></au></aug><url>ftp://ftp.hgsc.bcm.tmc.edu/pub/data/Btaurus/</url></bibl><bibl id="B26"><aug><au><cnm>Haploview | Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard</cnm></au></aug><url>http://www.broadinstitute.org/scientific-community/science/programs/medical-and-population-genetics/haploview/haploview</url></bibl><bibl id="B27"><title><p>A comprehensive genetic map of the cattle genome based on 3802 microsatellites</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ihara</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Takasuga</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Mizoshita</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Takeda</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Sugimoto</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Mizoguchi</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Hirano</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Itoh</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Watanabe</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Reed</snm><fnm>KM</fnm></au><au><snm>Snelling</snm><fnm>WM</fnm></au><au><snm>Kappes</snm><fnm>SM</fnm></au><au><snm>Beattie</snm><fnm>CW</fnm></au><au><snm>Bennett</snm><fnm>GL</fnm></au><au><snm>Sugimoto</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au></aug><source>Genome Res</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>14</volume><fpage>1987</fpage><lpage>1998</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1101/gr.2741704</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">524423</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15466297</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B28"><title><p>Multiple marker mapping of quantitative trait loci in a cross between outbred wild boar and large white pigs</p></title><aug><au><snm>Knott</snm><fnm>SA</fnm></au><au><snm>Marklund</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Haley</snm><fnm>CS</fnm></au><au><snm>Andersson</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Davies</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Ellegren</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Fredholm</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Hansson</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Hoyheim</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Lundstr&#246;m</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Moller</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Andersson</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>149</volume><fpage>1069</fpage><lpage>1080</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">1460207</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9611214</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B29"><title><p>QTL Express: mapping quantitative trait loci in simple and complex pedigrees</p></title><aug><au><snm>Seaton</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Haley</snm><fnm>CS</fnm></au><au><snm>Knott</snm><fnm>SA</fnm></au><au><snm>Kearsey</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Visscher</snm><fnm>PM</fnm></au></aug><source>Bioinformatics</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>18</volume><fpage>339</fpage><lpage>340</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/18.2.339</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11847090</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B30"><title><p>Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping</p></title><aug><au><snm>Churchill</snm><fnm>GA</fnm></au><au><snm>Doerge</snm><fnm>RW</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>1994</pubdate><volume>138</volume><fpage>963</fpage><lpage>971</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">1206241</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">7851788</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B31"><title><p>Confidence intervals in QTL mapping by bootstrapping</p></title><aug><au><snm>Visscher</snm><fnm>PM</fnm></au><au><snm>Thompson</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Haley</snm><fnm>CS</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>143</volume><fpage>1013</fpage><lpage>1020</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">1207319</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8725246</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B32"><source>Primer3 Input (version 0.4.0)</source><url>http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/primer3/</url></bibl><bibl id="B33"><aug><au><cnm>fastPHASE - Assets - Express Licenses - UW Center for Commercialization (C4C)</cnm></au></aug><url>http://depts.washington.edu/uwc4c/express-licenses/assets/fastphase/</url></bibl></refgrp></bm></art>