<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art><ui>1471-2156-11-96</ui><ji>1471-2156</ji><fm>
<dochead>Research article</dochead>
<bibl>
<title>
<p>Contrasting population genetic patterns within the white-throated sparrow genome (<it>Zonotrichia albicollis</it>)</p>
</title>
<aug>
<au id="A1"><snm>Huynh</snm><mi>Y</mi><fnm>Lynn</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><insr iid="I2"/><email>lyhuynh@emory.edu</email></au>
<au id="A2"><snm>Maney</snm><mi>L</mi><fnm>Donna</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>dmaney@emory.edu</email></au>
<au ca="yes" id="A3"><snm>Thomas</snm><mi>W</mi><fnm>James</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>jwthom2@emory.edu</email></au>
</aug>
<insg>
<ins id="I1"><p>Graduate Program in Population Biology, Ecology and Evolution, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA</p></ins>
<ins id="I2"><p>Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA</p></ins>
<ins id="I3"><p>Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA</p></ins>
</insg>
<source>BMC Genetics</source>
<issn>1471-2156</issn>
<pubdate>2010</pubdate>
<volume>11</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>96</fpage>
<url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/11/96</url>
<xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmpid">21029465</pubid><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2156-11-96</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
</bibl>
<history><rec><date><day>18</day><month>5</month><year>2010</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>28</day><month>10</month><year>2010</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>28</day><month>10</month><year>2010</year></date></pub></history>
<cpyrt><year>2010</year><collab>Huynh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
<abs>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Abstract</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Background</p>
</st>
<p>The level of nucleotide diversity observed across the genome is positively correlated with the local rate of recombination. Avian karyotypes are typified by large variation in chromosome size and the rate of recombination in birds has been shown to be negatively correlated with chromosome size. It has thus been predicted that nucleotide diversity is negatively correlated with chromosome size in aves. However, there is limited empirical evidence to support this prediction.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results</p>
</st>
<p>Here we sequenced 27 autosomal and 12 sex chromosome-linked loci in the white-throated sparrow (<it>Zonotrichia albicollis</it>) to quantify and compare patterns of recombination, linkage disequilibrium (LD), and genetic diversity across the genome of this North American songbird. Genetic diversity on the autosomes varied up to 8-fold, with the lowest diversity observed on the macrochromosomes and the highest diversity on the microchromosomes. Genetic diversity on the sex chromosomes was reduced compared to the autosomes, the most extreme difference being a ~300-fold difference between the W chromosome and the microchromosomes. LD and population structure associated with a common inversion polymorphism (ZAL2/2<sup>m</sup>) in this species were found to be atypical compared to other macrochromosomes, and nucleotide diversity within this inversion on the two chromosome arrangements was more similar to that observed on the Z chromosome.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusions</p>
</st>
<p>A negative correlation between nucleotide diversity and autosome size was observed in the white-throated sparrow genome, as well as low levels of diversity on the sex chromosomes comparable to those reported in other birds. The population structure and extended LD associated with the ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>chromosomal polymorphism are exceptional compared to the rest of the white-throated sparrow genome.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</abs>
</fm><bdy>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Background</p>
</st>
<p>The genomic landscape is influenced by the combined interactions of mutation, recombination, natural selection, genetic drift, and demographics. A primary goal of the field of population genetics is to understand the role and relative importance of these forces in generating and maintaining genetic variation. Within a genome, signatures of these forces can be inferred by examining local levels and patterns of genetic variation. In general, purifying selection is the dominant selective force in molecular evolution and results in a reduction of genetic diversity as new variants are selectively removed from the population <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Reductions in diversity can also arise from positive directional selection, in which a particular variant is favored by natural selection and rises to fixation resulting in the loss of diversity, referred to as a selective sweep <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. By contrast, other forms of positive selection, called balancing selection, can increase the amount of genetic diversity through heterozygote advantage or frequency-dependent selection <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Finally, genetic drift can randomly influence the evolutionary fate of new mutations regardless of their selective benefit, such that in smaller populations, variants are more likely to be lost due to drift <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>While selection and drift may act upon a single variant, the rate of recombination will determine whether closely linked sites will also be affected. In genomic locations where recombination is absent or infrequent, there will be linkage disequilibrium (LD), or non-random association of genetic variants. If purifying selection removes a deleterious mutation, any variation in strong LD with that mutation will also be removed <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. If positive selection fixes a beneficial mutation, any linked variation will also be fixed <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Together, background selection and genetic hitchhiking reduce overall levels of variation and inhibit the efficacy of selection because selection cannot act on mutations independently as a result of LD. This phenomenon is known as Hill-Robertson Interference or HRI <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. When recombination is frequent, the impact of HRI is minimized and standing variation is less susceptible to loss due to selection at another site. Levels of nucleotide diversity are therefore positively correlated with local rates of recombination <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
</abbrgrp> which are known to be variable across a genome <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Most avian genomes are organized into several large macrochromosomes, several intermediate sized chromosomes and many tiny microchromosomes <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In chicken and zebra finch, the rate of recombination on microchromosomes is 5-10 fold greater than on macrochromosomes <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The higher rate of recombination on the microchromosomes is at least in part due to the one obligatory cross-over required per chromosome arm for proper chromosome segregation during meiosis. As such, microchromosomes experience a higher rate of recombination per base than larger macrochromosomes, thus recombination rate increases as chromosome size decreases <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In zebra finch, Backstr&#246;m <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
</abbrgrp> also found a pronounced telomere effect such that recombination rates are highly elevated within &lt; 20 Mb of the telomeres. Because microchromosome are generally &lt; 20 Mb, their recombination landscape is uniformly elevated relative to the central regions of macro- and intermediate chromosomes <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Considering that smaller chromosomes have higher recombination rates, and that higher recombination rates are associated with increased nucleotide diversity, it is reasonable to expect that smaller chromosomes will harbor increased genetic variation <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, though this prediction has not been investigated in depth in avian genomes <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Furthermore, because recombination rate increases so dramatically toward the chromosome ends <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, intrachromosomal variation in nucleotide polymorphism may also be considerable with the highest diversity expected near the telomeres.</p>
<p>Polymorphism levels also differ between autosomes and sex chromosomes <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. This phenomenon occurs because standing variation is directly proportional to the effective population size (N<sub>e</sub>), which varies between sex chromosomes and autosomes. In a population consisting of equal numbers of males (ZZ) and females (ZW), there are 4 copies of each autosome for every 3 Z chromosomes, and every 1 W chromosome. The expected ratio of N<sub>e </sub>under a neutral model between autosomes and the Z and W chromosomes is therefore 4:3:1 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, and levels of nucleotide diversity are predicted to show the same relationship. Studies of avian sex chromosomes <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
</abbrgrp> have shown that the diversity on the Z and W is lower than expected based on relative N<sub>e </sub>when compared to autosomes, which is a pattern that has been widely observed in XY systems as well <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Sex chromosomes differ in their pattern of recombination: recombination is reduced on the Z compared to autosomes and absent in the non-recombining regions of the W. As a consequence of the patterns of recombination on the sex chromosomes, HRI will further reduce the genetic diversity of the Z and W, with the non-recombining region of the W chromosome experiencing the most dramatic reduction in genetic diversity <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>The W chromosome is in complete linkage disequilibrium with the mitochondrial genome, which is also non-recombining. As a result, any selective events on the W will affect the mitochondrial genome and vice versa <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The linkage disequilibrium between the W and mitochrondrial genome combined with HRI likely contribute to diversity levels on the W chromosome being 100-fold lower than those observed on autosomes <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The Z chromosome may also experience a further reduction in genetic diversity due to the fact that two-thirds of the time it is passed through the male germ line. When there is high variation in male mating success, the N<sub>e </sub>of the Z chromosome will be reduced, as well as the amount of neutral standing variation <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Thus, both the Z and W chromosomes are expected to experience reductions in diversity compared to theoretical expectations based on N<sub>e </sub>alone.</p>
<p>Previously, we described unusual patterns of genetic diversity and recombination in a remarkable chromosomal polymorphism in the white-throated sparrow (<it>Zonotrichia albicollis</it>) that shares many characteristics of sex chromosomes <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The ZAL2 and ZAL2<sup>m </sup>are heteromorphic chromosomes that differ from each other by a pair of nested inversions that span &gt; 100 Mb and suppress recombination across the majority of the chromosome <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The inversion is of particular interest because it is linked to differences in plumage coloration, social behavior and mate choice <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Approximately half of the individuals in this species are homozygous for the standard arrangement (ZAL2/2) and have tan-striped (TS) crowns, while the other half of the individuals in this species are heterozygous for the inverted arrangement (ZAL2/2<sup>m</sup>) and have white-striped (WS) crowns <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In general, the TS birds display more parental behaviors than their sex-matched WS counterparts whereas the WS birds display more aggressive sexual and territorial behavior than their sex-matched TS counterparts <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The ZAL2<sup>m </sup>is maintained in the population through a strong pattern of disassortative mating, where &gt; 96% of matings are between a TS bird (ZAL2/2) and a WS bird (ZAL2/2<sup>m</sup>) <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B28">28</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Because the ZAL2<sup>m </sup>is inherited in a Mendelian fashion, these pairings produce TS and WS offspring in equal proportions <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. This system is analogous to the ZW, where mating pairs consist of one ZZ (male) and ZW (female) bird and produce ZZ and ZW offspring in approximately equal proportions <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Note that WS &#215; WS breeding pairs are uncommon, and thus individuals homozygous for the inversion are rarely observed <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Like the Z chromosome, which recombines only in males, the ZAL2 recombines in approximately half of the population, the TS birds. In the other half, the WS birds, recombination is restricted to a small (~5-Mb) collinear segment outside the inversion that is analogous to the pseudoautosomal region of sex chromosomes <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Because no recombination occurs between the alternative chromosome arrangements within the inverted region, LD extends for &gt; 100 Mb <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The unusually high LD would make the ZAL2<sup>m </sup>and the ZAL2 sensitive to HRI and, in a previous study <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, we found genetic diversity within the inversion region on both arrangements to be reduced relative to the region outside the inversion. However, because sampling of the rest of the genome in our previous studies was limited, we were not able to interpret the population genetic signatures associated with the chromosomal polymorphism in the context of normal patterns of diversity and LD in this species. Furthermore, studying the patterns of variation in the white-throated sparrow genome can yield insights into the forces shaping the genetic landscape in this species, as well as those unique to avian genomes. Here we report the general population genetic patterns across the white-throated sparrow genome and evaluate those patterns in the context of chromosome size, autosomes versus sex chromosomes, and in comparison to the ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>polymorphism.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Data set</p>
</st>
<p>Summary statistics by chromosome category are shown in Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr> (with previously reported ZAL2/ZAL2<sup>m </sup>data included for reference) and detailed statistics for each locus can be found in Additional file <supplr sid="S1">1</supplr>. In total, we sequenced ~10 kb from 27 autosomal loci (nine pairs of BAC-end sequences and nine additional loci), as well as ~6 kb from the 12 sex-linked loci, three of which were from the W chromosome (1.7 kb). The majority of the sequence was intergenic or intronic with a small fraction of protein coding positions (~2%), and thus likely to reflect neutral levels of genetic variation. For autosomal and Z-linked loci, we sampled 9 - 12 birds with a minimum of four TS and four WS birds. For W-linked loci we sampled 23 - 24 females, including at least 14 TS and nine WS birds.</p>
<tbl id="T1"><title><p>Table 1</p></title><caption><p>Sampling information and diversity values for autosomal and sex-linked loci compared to previously reported values for ZAL2 and ZAL2<sup>m </sup>alternative chromosome arrangements.</p></caption><tblbdy cols="8">
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>Chromosome Class</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>Orthologous chromosome in chicken</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>Number of loci sampled</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>Number of chromosomes sampled</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>Total length sampled (bp)</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>S</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>Silent &#960;<sup>a</sup></it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>&#177; SD</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="8">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Sex chromosomes</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>Z</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>9</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>18-22</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3832 (3603)<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>12</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.00050</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&#177; 0.00009</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>W</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>46-48</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1729</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.00005</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&#177; 0.00005</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>ZAL2<sup>c</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>58</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>16</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>34827 (13804)<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>61</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.00072</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&#177; 0.00007</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>ZAL2<sup>m, c</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>58</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>8</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>34827 (13804)<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>32</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.00039</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&#177; 0.00006</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Chr2 outside of inversions<sup>c</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>24</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1654 (777)<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>17</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.00296</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&#177; 0.00041</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Macrochromosomes</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1, 2, 4</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>12</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>16-22</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4773</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>44</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.00198</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&#177; 0.00033</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Intermediate chromosomes</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>6, 7, 8, 9, 10</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>8</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>18-24</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3101</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>87</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.00485</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&#177; 0.00054</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Microchromosomes</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>17, 24, 27, 28</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>7</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>16-22</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2083 (1980)<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>136</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.01591</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&#177; 0.00115</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p><it>S </it>refers to the number of observed segregating sites.</p>
      <p><sup>a</sup>Average diversity is calculated from concatenated haplotypes from all loci in each category.</p>
      <p><sup>b</sup>Numbers in parentheses indicates the number of synonymous and noncoding positions.</p>
      <p><sup>c</sup>Data previously reported in a survey of standard ZAL2, inverted ZAL2<sup>m </sup>and a region outside of the inversion polymorphism.</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<suppl id="S1">
<title>
<p>Additional file 1</p>
</title>
<text>
<p>
<b>Supplementary Table 1</b>. Population genetics statistics for each locus in the study.</p>
</text>
<file name="1471-2156-11-96-S1.XLS">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Patterns of nucleotide diversity</p>
</st>
<p>To understand patterns of diversity as they relate to chromosome size, we grouped our autosomal data into three categories: macrochromosomes, intermediate chromosomes, and microchromosomes. Based on the 267 identified polymorphic autosomal sites (excluding three tri-allelic SNPs), we observed a trend of increasing diversity with decreasing chromosome size (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). Overall, the amount of nucleotide polymorphism across the sparrow genome is highly variable. The nucleotide diversity across the classes of autosomes varied up to 8-fold, with the lowest diversity observed on the macrochromosomes (&#960; &#177; SD = 1.98 &#215; 10<sup>-3 </sup>&#177; 3.3 &#215; 10<sup>-4</sup>) and the highest diversity on the microchromosomes (&#960; &#177; SD = 1.59 &#215; 10<sup>-2 </sup>&#177; 1.0 &#215; 10<sup>-3</sup>, Figure <figr fid="F1">1B</figr>). In order to quantify the correlation between chromosome (autosome) size and genetic diversity, we used all the individual estimates of nucleotide diversity and predicted chromosome sizes based on synteny with the assembled zebra finch genome to calculate Spearman's rho, a non-parametric measure of statistical dependence, for these two variables. By this measure there was a statistically significant negative correlation between nucleotide diversity and chromosome size (rho = -0.54, p &lt; 0.005, see also Additional files <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr> and <supplr sid="S3">3</supplr>).</p>
<fig id="F1"><title><p>Figure 1</p></title><caption><p>Average diversity across the sparrow genome</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Average diversity across the sparrow genome</b>. ZAL2 and ZAL2<sup>m </sup>refer to average &#960; within the inversion interval on each chromosome arrangement and ZAL2/2<sup>m&#8224; </sup>indicates the region outside the inversion on white-throated sparrow chromosome 2. They are shown for reference. A. Average genetic diversity (&#960;) per locus. B. Average genetic diversity (&#960;) for each chromosome type is calculated from concatenated sequences from all loci within that chromosome type. Error bars represent 95% CI (&#177; 1.96 &#215; SD). Note that the chromosomes labeled as Chr refer to the predicted orthologous chromosome in chicken.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2156-11-96-1" hint_layout="double"/></fig>
<suppl id="S2">
<title>
<p>Additional file 2</p>
</title>
<text>
<p>
<b>Supplementary Figure 1</b>. Sparrow genetic diversity by chromosome size.</p>
</text>
<file name="1471-2156-11-96-S2.JPEG">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<suppl id="S3">
<title>
<p>Additional file 3</p>
</title>
<text>
<p>
<b>Figure legend for Supplementary Figure 1</b>.</p>
</text>
<file name="1471-2156-11-96-S3.DOC">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<p>To provide independent support for the relationship we observed between nucleotide diversity and chromosome size, we calculated the pairwise divergence between available pairs of complete BAC clone sequences representing alternative haplotypes from three macrochromosomes and a microchromosome. Consistent with our results from the sequencing of multiple small loci in multiple individuals, nucleotide diversity was lower on the macrochromosomes than the sampled microchromosome. Specifically, after excluding low-quality sites and annotated protein coding exons and UTRs, the &#960; values for the macrochromosomes were 0.00120 &#177; 0.0006 (145,536 sites, orthologous to chicken chromosome 1[GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-id="AC235523" ext-link-type="gen">AC235523</ext-link> and <ext-link ext-link-id="AC236253" ext-link-type="gen">AC236253</ext-link>]), 0.00172 &#177; 0.00086 (142,469 sites, orthologous to chicken chromosome 2 [GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-id="AC237008" ext-link-type="gen">AC237008</ext-link> and <ext-link ext-link-id="AC236908" ext-link-type="gen">AC236908</ext-link>]), 0.00081 &#177; 0.0004 (143,722 sites, orthologous to chicken chromosome 5 [GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-id="AC236607" ext-link-type="gen">AC236607</ext-link> and <ext-link ext-link-id="AC237119" ext-link-type="gen">AC237119</ext-link>]), whereas the &#960; on the sampled microchromosome was 0.01632 &#177; 0.00816 (106,615 sites, orthologous to chicken chromosome 17, [GenBank:<ext-link ext-link-id="AC235993 " ext-link-type="gen">AC235993</ext-link> and <ext-link ext-link-id="AC235934" ext-link-type="gen">AC235934</ext-link>]). Thus, in this small independent data set the highest levels of nucleotide diversity were observed on a microchromosome.</p>
<p>For the sex chromosomes we identified 12 Z-linked SNPs and one polymorphic site on the W chromosome. As expected, the Z and W sex chromosomes showed reduced diversity compared to the sampled autosomal loci (&#960; &#177; SD = 5.0 &#215; 10<sup>-4 </sup>&#177; 9.0 &#215; 10<sup>-5 </sup>and 5.0 &#215; 10<sup>-5 </sup>&#177; 5.0 &#215; 10<sup>-5</sup>, respectively; see Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr> and Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>) and were lower than all three classes of autosomes. Our estimate of &#960; for the W chromosome was 10-fold lower than that of the Z chromosome and between 40- and 300-fold lower than the diversity on the autosomes, depending on which chromosome type was used for comparison. Note that the high variance in the estimate of &#960; for the W chromosome was due to the observation of just a single SNP.</p>
<p>Within the inversion, nucleotide diversity did not differ significantly between the ZAL2 and ZAL2<sup>m </sup>(Mann-Whitney U = 1603.0, N<sub>1 </sub>= 58; N<sub>2 </sub>= 58, p = 0.575), nor did it differ from that of either sex chromosome (ZAL2/Z, MWU = 190.0, N<sub>1 </sub>= 58; N<sub>2 </sub>= 9, p = 0.123; ZAL2<sup>m</sup>/Z, MWU = 175.0, N<sub>1 </sub>= 58; N<sub>2 </sub>= 9, p = 0.051; ZAL2/W, MWU = 82.0, N<sub>1 </sub>= 58; N<sub>2 </sub>= 3, p = 0.836; ZAL2<sup>m</sup>/W, MWU = 86.0, N<sub>1 </sub>= 58; N<sub>2 </sub>= 3, p = 0.965). Because of the limited number of loci sampled on the sex chromosomes compared to the ZAL2 and ZAL2<sup>m</sup>, the lack of a significant difference between the inverted interval and the sex chromosomes should be interpreted with caution. Nucleotide diversity within the inversion on both the ZAL2 and ZAL2<sup>m </sup>was, however, significantly lower than observed on other macrochromosomes (ZAL2: Mann-Whitney U = 123.5, N<sub>1 </sub>= 58; N<sub>2 </sub>= 12, p &lt; 0.001; ZAL2<sup>m</sup>: MWU = 94.5, N<sub>1 </sub>= 58; N<sub>2 </sub>= 12, p &lt; 0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Population structure</p>
</st>
<p>We previously reported extreme genetic differentiation between the ZAL2 and ZAL2<sup>m </sup>chromosomes as a result of suppressed recombination between the alternate chromosome types <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, which is also apparent in comparisons of TS and WS individuals. In order to compare this genetic differentiation to that present elsewhere in the genome, we calculated F<sub>ST </sub>between the groups of TS and WS birds at all the sampled loci (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr> and Additional file <supplr sid="S1">1</supplr>). Most F<sub>ST </sub>values for the autosomal and sex-linked loci clustered around zero, and we found no significant signal of population structure across the genome except within the ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>inversion interval (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>). Additionally, none of the haplotype networks constructed from individual loci unlinked to the ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>polymorphism revealed any clear indication of population structure (data not shown), indicating the genetic differentiation observed between TS and WS birds within the ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>inversion is exceptional with respect to the rest of the genome.</p>
<fig id="F2"><title><p>Figure 2</p></title><caption><p>F<sub>ST </sub>values between TS and WS white-throated sparrow groups across the genome</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>F<sub>ST </sub>values between TS and WS white-throated sparrow groups across the genome</b>. The ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>data point represents F<sub>ST </sub>within the inversion interval between the arrangements and is the only value to show significant population structure (p &lt; 0.01). The ZAL2/2<sup>m&#8224; </sup>data point represents the F<sub>ST </sub>outside the inversion on white-throated sparrow chromosome 2. Note that the chromosomes labeled as Chr refer to the predicted orthologous chromosome in chicken. Also note the negative F<sub>ST </sub>values are an artifact of the method used to calculate this statistic using sequence comparisons and are not significantly different from 0.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2156-11-96-2" hint_layout="single"/></fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Allele frequency spectra</p>
</st>
<p>Tests based on allele frequency distributions can yield insights into demographic, population genetic and evolutionary processes acting upon a particular genomic region. Previously, we reported a skew towards intermediate frequency alleles within the ZAL2/ZAL2<sup>m </sup>system and a positive Tajima's D <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. To establish whether this pattern was unique to the ZAL2/ZAL2<sup>m </sup>system within the sparrow genome, we calculated Tajima's D for all sampled loci (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>, Additional file <supplr sid="S1">1</supplr>). As with the F<sub>ST </sub>values, the Tajima's D associated with the ZAL2/ZAL2<sup>m </sup>chromosomal polymorphism was an outlier compared to the other regions of the white-throated sparrow genome. No Tajima's D values were found to be statistically different from neutral expectations, owing greatly to the conservative nature of the statistic. However, a one-tailed t-test demonstrates that the Tajima's D value for the ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>system is statistically different from values reported elsewhere in the genome (t = 27.72, p &lt; 0.0001).</p>
<fig id="F3"><title><p>Figure 3</p></title><caption><p>Tajima's D values across the sparrow genome</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Tajima's D values across the sparrow genome</b>. The ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>data point represents data from within the inversion on both chromosome arrangements, while the ZAL2/2<sup>m&#8224; </sup>represents Tajima's D for outside the inversion on white-throated sparrow chromosome 2. Note that the chromosomes labeled as Chr refer to the predicted orthologous chromosome in chicken.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2156-11-96-3" hint_layout="single"/></fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Linkage disequilibrium and recombination</p>
</st>
<p>Recombination is expected to reduce LD and, in general, LD decreases with increasing distance between sites. To compare LD associated with the ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>chromosomal polymorphism to that observed in the rest of the genome, we pooled r<sup>2 </sup>values from informative pairwise comparisons within autosomal loci, plotted their distribution as a function of distance (Figure <figr fid="F4">4A</figr>) and calculated their averages (Additional file <supplr sid="S4">4</supplr>). The r<sup>2 </sup>values from our autosomal data were generally low, as measured by ZnS = 0.14, a summary statistic which is based on the average correlation between pairs of sites <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B29">29</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Among the autosomal sites, LD decayed rapidly such that only limited LD was observed even within 500 bp (Figure <figr fid="F4">4A</figr> and <figr fid="F4">4B</figr>). Consistent with the overall low levels of LD, the four-gamete test revealed evidence for recombination across all our autosomal BAC-paired end loci (data not shown). Note that due to the limited number of informative pairwise comparisons on the Z (n = 3), no similar analyses could be performed on that chromosome. In contrast, we previously observed perfect LD between the majority of pairwise comparisons within the ZAL2/ZAL2<sup>m </sup>inversion, independent of distance between sites and extending to &gt; 100 Mb (Figure <figr fid="F4">4C</figr> and <figr fid="F4">4D</figr>). Thus, the strong LD associated with the chromosomal polymorphism was exceptional compared to other white-throated sparrow chromosomes.</p>
<fig id="F4"><title><p>Figure 4</p></title><caption><p>Linkage disequilibrium patterns within the sparrow genome</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Linkage disequilibrium patterns within the sparrow genome</b>. A. Patterns of LD between alleles among autosomal loci (excluding ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>data) show that LD is generally very low and decreases slightly with distance (See Additional file <supplr sid="S4">4</supplr>). B. A histogram indicates that the majority of pairwise comparisons among autosomal loci have 0 &lt; r<sup>2 </sup>&#8804; 0.1. C. Patterns of LD between alleles among ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>loci show high LD spanning > 100 Mb. D. A histogram indicates that the vast majority of pairwise comparisons within the ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>inversion show high r<sup>2</sup>, 0.9 &lt; r<sup>2 </sup>&#8804; 1.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2156-11-96-4" hint_layout="double"/></fig>
<suppl id="S4">
<title>
<p>Additional file 4</p>
</title>
<text>
<p>
<b>Supplementary Table 2</b>. Summary statistics for linkage disequilibrium by chromosome type and distance.</p>
</text>
<file name="1471-2156-11-96-S4.XLS">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Discussion</p>
</st>
<p>Nucleotide variation, linkage disequilibrium and genetic structure are all fundamental parameters that describe the population genetics of a species. Initial studies in the white-throated sparrow focused on characterizing the unusual ZAL2 and ZAL2<sup>m </sup>chromosome polymorphism <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In this study, we sequenced loci from other autosomes, as well as sex chromosomes to understand population genetic patterns elsewhere in the genome and to compare and contrast these patterns with those previously reported for the ZAL2 and ZAL2<sup>m </sup>chromosomes.</p>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Contrasting patterns of nucleotide diversity within the sparrow genome</p>
</st>
<p>On average across all sparrow autosomes, one segregating site is observed every ~180 bp (&#960; = 5.62 &#215; 10<sup>-3 </sup>&#177; 4.7 &#215; 10<sup>-4</sup>). This estimate is similar to the diversities calculated in other natural populations of passerine birds, such as <it>Ficedula </it>flycatchers, &#960; = 2.7 - 3.6 &#215; 10<sup>-3</sup>, <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
<abbr bid="B30">30</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, <it>Carpodacus </it>finches, &#960; = 5.7 - 8.5 &#215; 10<sup>-3 </sup>
<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B31">31</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, the great reed warbler, &#960; = 1.2 &#215; 10<sup>-3 </sup>
<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and the blue tit, &#960; = 1.8 &#215; 10<sup>-3 </sup>
<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Nucleotide diversity across the sparrow autosomes varies substantially, spanning a range of nearly two orders of magnitude between individual loci (&#960; = 3.0 &#215; 10<sup>-4 </sup>- 2.9 &#215; 10<sup>-2</sup>). The microchromosome group on average was associated with the highest level of nucleotide diversity and was 8-fold higher than the macrochromosomes. However, as pointed out in the Results section, the level of nucleotide diversity was not perfectly correlated with chromosome size. For example, the diversity of the loci orthologous to microchromosomes 24 and 28 were comparable to that observed on the macrochromosomes. This result could be attributed to a number of factors, such as local variation in recombination rates, or may reflect inaccurate assignment of these white-throated loci to chromosome class sizes caused by differences in genome organization between this species and the zebra finch or chicken.</p>
<p>The negative correlation between nucleotide diversity and chromosome size class observed in our study was previously predicted for avian genomes based on two well-established observations. The first is that the rate of recombination on avian microchromosomes can be 5-10 times greater than on macrochromosomes <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The second observation is that regions of high recombination tend to harbor greater genetic variation <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Nevertheless, previous studies that tested for this correlation in nucleotide diversity in the chicken genome reported conflicting results <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Future studies will therefore be necessary to establish whether the negative correlation between nucleotide diversity and chromosome size we observed for the white-throated sparrow autosomes is a general characteristic of avian genomes.</p>
<p>As expected, the white-throated sparrow sex chromosomes showed the lowest levels of genetic diversity. The neutral theory predicts a ratio of 1:3:4 for the genetic diversities of the W, Z and autosomes based on their relative N<sub>e</sub>s. Z to autosome diversity (&#960;<sub>Z </sub>: &#960;<sub>A</sub>) is therefore expected to equal 0.75 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. However, because sex chromosomes are transmitted differently from autosomes, the standard models of how mutation, selection, drift, demography and mating system influence population genetic patterns may not apply <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The combined effects of increased HRI and lowered N<sub>e </sub>due to variation in male mating success can reduce Z chromosome diversity relative to autosomal diversity <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Indeed, reports of avian &#960;<sub>Z </sub>: &#960;<sub>A </sub>are lower than the expected 0.75: in <it>Ficedula </it>flycatchers &#960;<sub>Z</sub>: &#960;<sub>A </sub>&#8776; 0.4 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and in chicken &#960;<sub>Z</sub>: &#960;<sub>A </sub>&#8776; 0.25 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. However, because those studies did not indicate the chromosome size class of the autosomal loci used for comparison, the degree to which the &#960;<sub>Z</sub>: &#960;<sub>A </sub>is skewed is uncertain. Our finding that chromosome size and genetic diversity are negatively correlated suggests that it is appropriate to consider Z chromosome diversity in reference to similarly sized chromosomes (macrochromosomes). In the white-throated sparrow the &#960;<sub>Z</sub>: &#960;<sub>A </sub>&#8776; 0.08 when comparing Z chromosome diversity to average diversity across all autosomes. However, when comparing Z chromosome diversity to average macrochromosome diversity, &#960;<sub>Z</sub>: &#960;<sub>A </sub>&#8776; 0.25, which highlights the importance of considering chromosome type when calculating this ratio.</p>
<p>Under the neutral model, the W chromosome-to-autosome diversity is predicted to be 1:4 or 0.25. However, studies of the avian W chromosomes report far lower diversity values. For example, in a survey of ~3.4 kb from &gt; 150 W chromosomes in seven avian species, Montell et al. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
</abbrgrp> did not observe any polymorphisms. Berlin and Ellegren <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
</abbrgrp> identified a single segregating site in a survey of ~8 kb in 47 chickens from divergent breeds and estimated &#960;<sub>W </sub>= 7 &#215; 10<sup>-5</sup>, ~1/100 of their &#960;<sub>A </sub>estimate <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Similarly, we observed low levels of variation on the W chromosome, although it should be pointed out that our estimate of &#960; for the W was based on a single SNP.</p>
<p>Within the white-throated sparrow genome, dramatic HRI is probably not limited to the sex chromosomes. We previously reported patterns of reduced recombination and extensive LD within the ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>system, which bears striking similarities to sex chromosomes <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Avian macrochromosomes are disproportionately associated with recombination deserts, except close to the chromosome ends <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Thus, the low rate of recombination for macrochromosomes is likely to result in intrinsically low diversity values, which are further reduced by HRI on the ZAL2 and ZAL2<sup>m</sup>.</p>
<p>Although the ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>system bears many similarities to the XY (ZW) sex chromosomes, including differences in patterns of recombination, disassortative mating, and reduced genetic diversity, the ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>are not sex-linked and, as such, sexual selection <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, sex-biased demographic history <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, nor mitochondrial linkage <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
</abbrgrp> can easily explain patterns of evolution within the ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>system. For these reasons, the ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>polymorphism remains an informative point of comparison for the study of population genetic patterns of sex chromosomes and can help distinguish between sex-specific and fundamental molecular evolutionary processes that shape their evolution.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>LD within the sparrow genome</p>
</st>
<p>The extent of LD is dependent on two key parameters: N<sub>e </sub>and recombination rate <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. While the extent of LD within avian genomes from natural bird populations is largely unknown, the few studies currently available indicate that LD is generally low on avian autosomes as a consequence of high rates of recombination <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
<abbr bid="B39">39</abbr>
<abbr bid="B40">40</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Megens <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
</abbrgrp> reported a correlation between LD and chromosome size, such that macrochromosomes exhibit consistently higher LD when compared to microchromosomes. Our autosomal data are consistent with these reports in that on average we found only weak LD even between sites within a few hundred bases of each other, and that the macrochromosomes were associated with the strongest LD (see Additional file <supplr sid="S4">4</supplr>).</p>
<p>The one striking exception to the general pattern of low LD in the sparrow genome we did observe was within the ZAL2/ZAL2<sup>m </sup>inversion. Our previous study of the ZAL2 and ZAL2<sup>m </sup>chromosomes revealed extensive LD spanning &gt; 100 Mb, thus representing one of the largest segregating haplotypes ever reported <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Given our findings here, as well as the general patterns of low LD reported in other bird autosomes <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
<abbr bid="B39">39</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, we conclude that the LD observed between the ZAL2 and ZAL2<sup>m </sup>is unusual within the sparrow genome as well as amongst avian genomes in general.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Population structure</p>
</st>
<p>Our previous studies of the ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>system indicated extensive population structure within the inversion polymorphism <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The majority of the segregating sites (~70%) were fixed differences and F<sub>ST </sub>= 0.94 (p &lt; 0.01) within the inversion between the alternate arrangements <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The high proportion of fixed differences between the chromosome arrangements resulted in many intermediate frequency variants, and thus a large and positive Tajima's D value. In this study of autosomal and sex-linked loci, we found no significant population structure between WS and TS birds outside of the ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>inversion. Additionally, the negative Tajima's D values observed for most of the other sampled loci indicate that the effects of balancing selection through disassortative mating are limited to the ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>system.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusions</p>
</st>
<p>Our population-based sequencing survey of autosomes and sex chromosomes in the white-throated sparrow provides empirical evidence for the predicted negative correlation between chromosome size and nucleotide diversity in avian genomes. In addition, we found that the patterns of nucleotide diversity, population structure, and LD previously associated with the ZAL2/2<sup>m </sup>chromosomal polymorphism in this species are atypical compared to other macrochromosomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Methods</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>White-throated sparrow samples</p>
</st>
<p>White-throated sparrows and a female dark-eyed junco (<it>Junco hyemalis</it>) were collected in mist nets on the campus of Emory University in Atlanta, GA during November and December of 2005-2008. Visual examination of the plumage and a PCR-based assay were used to infer the genotype with respect to the ZAL2/ZAL2<sup>m </sup>polymorphism for each bird included in the study <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B41">41</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Note that the frequency of WS and TS individuals in our locally sampled population is comparable to the overall frequency reported for the species, <it>i.e</it>. 50:50 (DL Maney, unpublished data). The Emory University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all procedures involving animals.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>DNA sequencing</p>
</st>
<p>PCR primers for autosomal and Z chromosomes were designed in Primer3 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B42">42</abbr>
</abbrgrp> using white-throated sparrow BAC-end sequences that mapped to unique locations in the zebra finch genome (taeGut1)<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B43">43</abbr>
</abbrgrp> by MEGABLAST searches (-t 16, -N 2, -W 11, -e 1e-30) <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B44">44</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. For the W-linked loci, we designed primers from a completely sequenced white-throated sparrow BAC from the W chromosome [GenBank: <ext-link ext-link-id="AC236562" ext-link-type="gen">AC236562</ext-link>] containing the <it>CHD1W </it>locus. To avoid potential amplification of gametologous Z chromosome loci, the W chromosome primers were designed to include at least three mismatches compared to the corresponding Z chromosome sequence. A complete list of PCR primers, their orthologous positions in zebra finch, and orthologous chromosome assignments in chicken are listed in Additional file <supplr sid="S5">5</supplr>. Each 25 &#956;L PCR contained final concentrations of 1X PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 20 pM of each primer, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 1.5 U of Taq or Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen) and ~25 ng of genomic DNA. PCR cycling parameters were as follows: 94&#176; for 5 min, 35 cycles of 94&#176; for 30 sec, 55&#176; for 30 sec and 72&#176; for 1 min, followed by 72&#176; for 7 min. Amplicons were subsequently purified and directly sequenced (Sanger sequencing) [GenBank: <ext-link ext-link-id="GU449819" ext-link-type="gen">GU449819</ext-link> - <ext-link ext-link-id="GU450219" ext-link-type="gen">GU450219</ext-link>, <ext-link ext-link-id="GU450273" ext-link-type="gen">GU450273</ext-link> - <ext-link ext-link-id="GU450309" ext-link-type="gen">GU450309</ext-link> and <ext-link ext-link-id="HM126554" ext-link-type="gen">HM126554</ext-link> - <ext-link ext-link-id="HM126573" ext-link-type="gen">HM126573</ext-link>].</p>
<suppl id="S5">
<title>
<p>Additional file 5</p>
</title>
<text>
<p>
<b>Supplementary Table 3</b>. PCR primer information for all loci in this study.</p>
</text>
<file name="1471-2156-11-96-S5.XLS">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>SNP discovery and sequence annotation</p>
</st>
<p>Nucleotide polymorphisms were automatically called using SNPdetector <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B45">45</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and manually confirmed prior to further analyses. Annotation of the gene features for each locus was based on the annotation of orthologous zebra finch genomic segments (taeGut1) <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B43">43</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Insertion-deletion polymorphisms and sites with more than two segregating alleles were excluded from our analyses, as these events were relatively infrequent and could not be readily incorporated into the subsequent analyses. Like most other avian genomes, the white-throated sparrow karyotype consists of macro-, intermediate and microchromosomes <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Given that synteny is highly conserved among even distantly related birds, such as the zebra finch and chicken <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B43">43</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, we predicted linkage and corresponding chromosome size in the white-throated sparrow based on orthology to the zebra finch and chicken genomes. To examine population genetic patterns between differently sized autosomes, we grouped our sequence data by chromosome type according to the classification convention of the International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium that divides chicken autosomes into three size classes: macrochromosomes (GGA 1-5), intermediate chromosomes (GGA 6-10) and microchromosomes (GGA 11-38) <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Population genetic analysis</p>
</st>
<p>Where we had sequence from paired BAC ends, genotypes were concatenated and phased as a single locus using Phase v2.1.1 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B46">46</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Haplotypes were then split into individual loci for population genetic analysis, except for calculation of LD and construction of haplotype networks. Analysis of polymorphism and tests of neutrality based on allele frequency spectrum, (Tajima's D and Fu and Li's statistics) were performed in DnaSP v5.1 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B47">47</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Using Splitstree v4.10 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B48">48</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, we generated haplotype networks using the neighbor-joining algorithm and <it>J. hyemalis </it>sequence as an outgroup. Haplotype networks were constructed for individual loci and, when possible, for the concatenated paired BAC-ends. To quantify population structure, F<sub>ST </sub>values were calculated in Arlequin v3.11 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B49">49</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and statistical significance was assessed with exact tests for genetic differentiation. In order to make a direct comparison between F<sub>ST </sub>within the ZAL2/ZAL2<sup>m </sup>system and the autosomal and sex-linked loci reported here, we calculated F<sub>ST </sub>between the TS and WS groups. LD and r<sup>2 </sup>values for all pairwise comparisons between informative sites, including paired BAC-end sequences when possible, were calculated with Haploview v4.2 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B50">50</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In addition to inferring recombination from levels of LD, we identified four-gamete pairs within all loci using DnaSP v5.1 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B47">47</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and estimated the average haplotype block size using the four-gamete rule in Haploview v4.2 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B50">50</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>In order to compare levels of diversity among the ZAL2/2 m, sex chromosomes, and macrochromosomes we performed an overall omnibus test followed by planned pairwise comparisons. Because the data set contained many zeros, the data could not be normalized by transformation. We therefore used a nonparametric approach (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA followed by Mann-Whitney U tests).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Authors' contributions</p>
</st>
<p>LYH, DLM and JWT conceived the project. LYH performed the genotyping and population genetic analyses. DLM provided the DNA samples. LYH and JWT drafted the manuscript and all authors approved the final version of the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
</bdy><bm>
<ack>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Acknowledgements</p>
</st>
<p>The authors thank R.T. Sullivan, G.K. Tharp and J. Griffin for their computational support, and D. Cutler, K. Dyer, T. Schlenke and Y. Tao for advice on population genetic analyses and comments on the manuscript, and Cheryl Strauss for technical writing edits. L.Y.H. was supported by a Ford Foundation Pre-doctoral Fellowship and a grant from the Center of Behavioral Neuroscience awarded to D.L.M. D.L.M. and J.W.T. were supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (1R21MH082046).</p>
</sec>
</ack>
<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>The neutral theory of molecular evolution</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kimura</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><pubdate>1983</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene</p></title><aug><au><snm>Maynard</snm><mnm>Smith</mnm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Haigh</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Genet Res</source><pubdate>1974</pubdate><volume>23</volume><fpage>23</fpage><lpage>35</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Balancing selection and its effects on sequences in nearby genome regions</p></title><aug><au><snm>Charlesworth</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>PLoS Genet</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>2</volume><fpage>e64</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>Effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Charlesworth</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au></aug><source>Nat Genet Rev</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>10</volume><fpage>195</fpage><lpage>205</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>The pattern of neutral molecular variation under the background selection model</p></title><aug><au><snm>Charlesworth</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Charlesworth</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Morgan</snm><fnm>MT</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>1995</pubdate><volume>141</volume><fpage>1619</fpage><lpage>1632</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hill</snm><fnm>WG</fnm></au><au><snm>Robertson</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Genet Res</source><pubdate>1966</pubdate><volume>8</volume><fpage>269</fpage><lpage>294</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in <it>D. melanogaster</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Begun</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Aquadro</snm><fnm>CF</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>1992</pubdate><volume>356</volume><fpage>519</fpage><lpage>520</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>, Variation in recombination rate across the genome evidence and implications</p></title><aug><au><snm>Nachman</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Curr Opin Genet Devel</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>12</volume><fpage>657</fpage><lpage>663</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution</p></title><aug><au><cnm>International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium</cnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>432</volume><fpage>695</fpage><lpage>716</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>The recombination landscape of the zebra finch <it>Taeniopygia guttata </it>genome</p></title><aug><au><snm>Backstr&#246;m</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Forstmeier</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Schielzeth</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Mellenius</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Nam</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Bolund</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Webster</snm><fnm>MT</fnm></au><au><snm>&#214;st</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Schneider</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kempenaers</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Ellegren</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Genome Res</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>20</volume><fpage>485</fpage><lpage>95</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>Micro vs macro: Structural-funtional organization of avian micro- and macrochromosomes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rodionov</snm><fnm>AV</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetika</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>32</volume><fpage>597</fpage><lpage>608</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>The avian genome uncovered</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ellegren</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Trends in Ecol and Evol</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>20</volume><fpage>180</fpage><lpage>186</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>Positive correlation between recombination rate and nucleotide diversity is shown under domestication selection in the chicken genome</p></title><aug><au><snm>Fang</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Ye</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Wong</snm><fnm>GK-S</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Chinese Science Bull</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>53</volume><fpage>746</fpage><lpage>750</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>A genetic variation map for chicken with 28 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms</p></title><aug><au><cnm>International Chicken Polymorphism Map Consortium</cnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>432</volume><fpage>717</fpage><lpage>722</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>The different levels of genetic diversity in sex chromosome and autosomes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ellegren</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Trends Genet</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>25</volume><fpage>278</fpage><lpage>284</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>Chicken W: A genetically uniform chromosome in a highly variable genome</p></title><aug><au><snm>Berlin</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Ellegren</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>PNAS</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>101</volume><fpage>15967</fpage><lpage>15969</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B17"><title><p>Contrasting levels of nucleotide diversity on the avian Z and W sex chromosomes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Montell</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Fridolfsson</snm><fnm>A-K</fnm></au><au><snm>Ellegren</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Biol Evol</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>18</volume><fpage>2010</fpage><lpage>2016</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>Steps in the evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Charlesworth</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Charlesworth</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Marais</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Heredity</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>95</volume><fpage>118</fpage><lpage>128</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>Low mitochondrial variability in birds may indicate Hill-Robertson effects on the W chromosome</p></title><aug><au><snm>Berlin</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Tomaras</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Charlesworth</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au></aug><source>Heredity</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>99</volume><fpage>389</fpage><lpage>396</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B20"><title><p>Contrasting patterns of polymorphism and divergence on the Z chromosome and autosomes in two <it>Ficedula </it>flycatcher species</p></title><aug><au><snm>Borge</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Webster</snm><fnm>MT</fnm></au><au><snm>Andersson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Saetre</snm><fnm>G.-P</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>171</volume><fpage>1861</fpage><lpage>1873</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p>Reduced variation on the chicken Z chromosome</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sundstr&#246;m</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Webster</snm><fnm>MT</fnm></au><au><snm>Ellegren</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>167</volume><fpage>377</fpage><lpage>385</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B22"><title><p>Chromosome-wide linkage disequilibrium caused by an inversion polymorphism in the white-throated sparrow (<it>Zonotrichia albicollis</it>)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Huynh</snm><fnm>LY</fnm></au><au><snm>Maney</snm><fnm>DL</fnm></au><au><snm>Thomas</snm><fnm>JW</fnm></au></aug><source>Heredity</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><inpress/></bibl><bibl id="B23"><title><p>The chromosomal polymorphism linked to variation in social behavior in the white-throated sparrow (<it>Zonotrichia albicollis</it>) is a complex rearrangement and suppressor of recombination</p></title><aug><au><snm>Thomas</snm><fnm>JW</fnm></au><au><snm>C&#225;ceres</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Lowman</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au><au><snm>Morehouse</snm><fnm>CB</fnm></au><au><snm>Short</snm><fnm>ME</fnm></au><au><snm>Baldwin</snm><fnm>EL</fnm></au><au><snm>Maney</snm><fnm>DL</fnm></au><au><snm>Martin</snm><fnm>CL</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>179</volume><fpage>1455</fpage><lpage>1468</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B24"><title><p>Chromosomal polymorphism in the white-throated sparrow, <it>Zonotrichia albicollis </it>(Gmelin)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Thorneycroft</snm><fnm>HB</fnm></au></aug><source>Science</source><pubdate>1966</pubdate><volume>154</volume><fpage>1571</fpage><lpage>1572</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B25"><title><p>A cytogenetic study of the white-throated sparrow, <it>Zonotrichia albicollis</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Thorneycroft</snm><fnm>HB</fnm></au></aug><source>Evolution</source><pubdate>1975</pubdate><volume>29</volume><fpage>611</fpage><lpage>621</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B26"><title><p>Alternative reproductive strategies in the white-throated sparrow: behavioral and genetic evidence</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tuttle</snm><fnm>EM</fnm></au></aug><source>Behav Ecol</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>14</volume><fpage>425</fpage><lpage>432</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B27"><title><p>White-throated sparrow (<it>Zonotrichia albicollis</it>), in The Birds of North America</p></title><aug><au><snm>Falls</snm><fnm>JB</fnm></au><au><snm>Kopachena</snm><fnm>JG</fnm></au></aug><publisher>Washington, DC: The Academy of Natural Sciences: Philadelphia/The American Ornithologists' Union</publisher><editor>Poole A, Gill F</editor><pubdate>1994</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B28"><title><p>Polymorphism in the white-throated sparrow, <it>Zonotrichia albicollis </it>(Gmelin)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lowther</snm><fnm>JK</fnm></au></aug><source>Can J Zool</source><pubdate>1961</pubdate><volume>39</volume><fpage>281</fpage><lpage>292</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B29"><title><p>A test of neutrality based on interlocus associations</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kelly</snm><fnm>JK</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>146</volume><fpage>1197</fpage><lpage>1206</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B30"><title><p>Single-nucleotide polymorphism characterization in species with limited available sequence information: high nucleotide diversity revealed in the avian genome</p></title><aug><au><snm>Primmer</snm><fnm>CR</fnm></au><au><snm>Borge</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Lindell</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Saetre</snm><fnm>G-P</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Ecol</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>11</volume><fpage>603</fpage><lpage>612</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B31"><title><p>Reconciling actual and inferred population histories in the house finch (<it>Carpodacus mexicanus</it>) by AFLP analysis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>Z</fnm></au><au><snm>Baker</snm><fnm>AJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Hill</snm><fnm>GE</fnm></au><au><snm>Edwards</snm><fnm>SV</fnm></au></aug><source>Evolution</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>57</volume><fpage>2852</fpage><lpage>2864</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B32"><title><p>Genomics of natural bird populations: a gene-based set of reference markers evenly spread across the avian genome</p></title><aug><au><snm>Backstr&#246;m</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Fagerberg</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Ellegren</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Ecol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>17</volume><fpage>964</fpage><lpage>980</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B33"><title><p>Comparison of linkage disequilibrium and haplotype diversity on macro- and microchromsomes in chicken</p></title><aug><au><snm>Megens</snm><fnm>H-J</fnm></au><au><snm>Croojimans</snm><fnm>RP</fnm></au><au><snm>Bastiaansen</snm><fnm>JW</fnm></au><au><snm>Kerstens</snm><fnm>HHD</fnm></au><au><snm>Coster</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Jalving</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Vereijken</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Silva</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Muir</snm><fnm>WM</fnm></au><au><snm>Cheng</snm><fnm>HH</fnm></au><au><snm>Hanotte</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Groenen</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au></aug><source>BMC Genetics</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>10</volume><fpage>86</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B34"><title><p>On the effective size of populations with separate sexes, with particular reference to sex-linked genes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Caballero</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>1995</pubdate><volume>139</volume><fpage>1007</fpage><lpage>1011</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B35"><title><p>Sex-biased evolutionary forces shape genomic patterns of human diversity</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hammer</snm><fnm>MF</fnm></au><au><snm>Mendez</snm><fnm>FL</fnm></au><au><snm>Cox</snm><fnm>MP</fnm></au><au><snm>Woerner</snm><fnm>AE</fnm></au><au><snm>Wall</snm><fnm>JD</fnm></au></aug><source>PLoS Genet</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><fpage>e1000202</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B36"><title><p>Accelerated genetic drift on chromosome X during the human dispersal out of Africa</p></title><aug><au><snm>Keinan</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Mullikin</snm><fnm>JC</fnm></au><au><snm>Patterson</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Reich</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Nat Genet</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>41</volume><fpage>66</fpage><lpage>77</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B37"><title><p>A linkage map of the Zebra Finch <it>Taeniopygia guttata </it>provides new insights into avian genome evolution</p></title><aug><au><snm>Stapley</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Birhead</snm><fnm>TR</fnm></au><au><snm>Burke</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Slate</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>179</volume><fpage>651</fpage><lpage>667</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B38"><title><p>Nucleotide variation, linkage disequilibrium and founder-facilitated speciation in wild populations of the Zebra Finch (<it>Taeniopygia guttata</it>)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Balakrishnan</snm><fnm>CN</fnm></au><au><snm>Edwards</snm><fnm>SV</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>181</volume><fpage>645</fpage><lpage>660</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B39"><title><p>Hitchhiking and recombination in birds: evidence from Mhc-linked and unlinked loci in red-winged blackbirds (<it>Agelaius phoeniceus</it>)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Edwards</snm><fnm>SV</fnm></au><au><snm>Dillon</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Genet Res</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>84</volume><fpage>175</fpage><lpage>192</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B40"><title><p>Levels of linkage disequilibrium in a wild bird population</p></title><aug><au><snm>Backstr&#246;m</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Qvarnstr&#246;m</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Gustafsson</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Ellegren</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Biol Lett</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>2</volume><fpage>435</fpage><lpage>438</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B41"><title><p>A genotyping assay to determine plumage morph in the White-throated sparrow, <it>Zonotrichia albicollis</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Michopoulos</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Maney</snm><fnm>DL</fnm></au><au><snm>Morehouse</snm><fnm>CB</fnm></au><au><snm>Thomas</snm><fnm>JW</fnm></au></aug><source>Auk</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>124</volume><fpage>1330</fpage><lpage>1335</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B42"><title><p>Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rozen</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Skaletsky</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Methods Mol Biol</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>132</volume><fpage>365</fpage><lpage>86</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B43"><title><p>The genome of a songbird</p></title><aug><au><snm>Warren</snm><fnm>WC</fnm></au><au><snm>Clayton</snm><fnm>DF</fnm></au><au><snm>Ellegren</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Arnold</snm><fnm>AP</fnm></au><au><snm>Hillier</snm><fnm>LW</fnm></au><au><snm>K&#252;nstner</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Searle</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>White</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Vilella</snm><fnm>AJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Fairley</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Heger</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Kong</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Ponting</snm><fnm>CP</fnm></au><au><snm>Jarvis</snm><fnm>ED</fnm></au><au><snm>Mello</snm><fnm>CV</fnm></au><au><snm>Minx</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Lovell</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Velho</snm><fnm>TA</fnm></au><au><snm>Ferris</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Balakrishnan</snm><fnm>CN</fnm></au><au><snm>Sinha</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Blatti</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>London</snm><fnm>SE</fnm></au><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Lin</snm><fnm>YC</fnm></au><au><snm>George</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Sweedler</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Southey</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Gunaratne</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Watson</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><etal/></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>464</volume><fpage>757</fpage><lpage>762</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B44"><title><p>A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>Z</fnm></au><au><snm>Schwartz</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Wagner</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Miller</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>J Comput Biol</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>7</volume><fpage>203</fpage><lpage>214</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B45"><title><p>SNPdetector: A software tool for sensitive and accurate SNP detection</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Wheeler</snm><fnm>DA</fnm></au><au><snm>Yakub</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Wei</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Sood</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Rowe</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Liu</snm><fnm>PP</fnm></au><au><snm>Gibbs</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au><au><snm>Buetow</snm><fnm>KH</fnm></au></aug><source>PloS Comput Biol</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>1</volume><fpage>e53</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B46"><title><p>A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data</p></title><aug><au><snm>Stephens</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Smith</snm><fnm>NJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Donnelly</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Hum Genet</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>68</volume><fpage>978</fpage><lpage>989</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B47"><title><p>DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data</p></title><aug><au><snm>Librado</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Rozas</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Bioinformatics</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>25</volume><fpage>1451</fpage><lpage>1452</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B48"><title><p>Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies</p></title><aug><au><snm>Huson</snm><fnm>DH</fnm></au><au><snm>Bryant</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Biol Evol</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>23</volume><fpage>254</fpage><lpage>267</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B49"><title><p>Arlequin ver 30: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Excoffier</snm><fnm>LGL</fnm></au><au><snm>Schneider</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>1</volume><fpage>47</fpage><lpage>50</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B50"><title><p>Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps</p></title><aug><au><snm>Barrett</snm><fnm>JC</fnm></au><au><snm>Fry</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Maller</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Daly</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Bioinformatics</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>263</fpage><lpage>265</lpage></bibl></refgrp>
</bm></art>