<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
	<ui>1471-2148-12-143</ui>
	<ji>1471-2148</ji>
	<fm>
		<dochead>Research article</dochead>
		<bibl>
			<title>
				<p>Ancestral polymorphism at the major histocompatibility complex (MHCII&#223;) in the <it>Nesospiza</it> bunting species complex and its sister species (<it>Rowettia goughensis</it>)</p>
			</title>
			<aug>
				<au id="A1" ca="yes"><snm>van Rensburg</snm><mnm>Jansen</mnm><fnm>Alexandra</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>alexjvr@gmail.com</email></au>
				<au id="A2" ce="yes"><snm>Bloomer</snm><fnm>Paulette</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>paulette.bloomer@up.ac.za</email></au>
				<au id="A3" ce="yes"><snm>Ryan</snm><mi>G</mi><fnm>Peter</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>pryan31@gmail.com</email></au>
				<au id="A4" ca="yes"><snm>Hansson</snm><fnm>Bengt</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>bengt.hansson@biol.lu.se</email></au>
			</aug>
			<insg>
				<ins id="I1"><p>Molecular Ecology and Evolution Program, Department of Genetics, University of Pretoria, Private bag X20, Hatfield, 0028, South Africa</p></ins>
				<ins id="I2"><p>Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa</p></ins>
				<ins id="I3"><p>Molecular Ecology and Evolution Lab, Department of Biology, Lund University, SE-22362, Lund, Sweden</p></ins>
			</insg>
			<source>BMC Evolutionary Biology</source>
			<section><title><p>Speciation and evolutionary genetics</p></title></section><issn>1471-2148</issn>
			<pubdate>2012</pubdate>
			<volume>12</volume>
			<issue>1</issue>
			<fpage>143</fpage>
			<url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/12/143</url>
			<xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2148-12-143</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">22894748</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
		</bibl>
		<history><rec><date><day>7</day><month>11</month><year>2011</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>13</day><month>7</month><year>2012</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>15</day><month>8</month><year>2012</year></date></pub></history>
		<cpyrt><year>2012</year><collab>Jansen van Rensburg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
		<abs>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Abstract</p>
				</st>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Background</p>
					</st><p>The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is an important component of the vertebrate immune system and is frequently used to characterise adaptive variation in wild populations due to its co-evolution with pathogens. Passerine birds have an exceptionally diverse MHC with multiple gene copies and large numbers of alleles compared to other avian taxa. The <it>Nesospiza</it> bunting species complex (two species on Nightingale Island; one species with three sub-species on Inaccessible Island) represents a rapid adaptive radiation at a small, isolated archipelago, and is thus an excellent model for the study of adaptation and speciation. In this first study of MHC in <it>Nesospiza</it> buntings, we aim to characterize MHCII&#223; variation, determine the strength of selection acting at this gene region and assess the level of shared polymorphism between the <it>Nesospiza</it> species complex and its putative sister taxon, <it>Rowettia goughensis,</it> from Gough Island.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Results</p>
					</st><p>In total, 23 unique alleles were found in 14 <it>Nesospiza</it> and 2 <it>R. goughensis</it> individuals encoding at least four presumably functional loci and two pseudogenes. There was no evidence of ongoing selection on the peptide binding region (PBR). Of the 23 alleles, 15 were found on both the islands inhabited by <it>Nesospiza</it> species, and seven in both <it>Nesospiza</it> and <it>Rowettia</it>; indications of shared, ancestral polymorphism. A gene tree of <it>Nesospiza</it> MHCII&#223; alleles with several other passerine birds shows three highly supported <it>Nesospiza</it>-specific groups. All <it>R. goughensis</it> alleles were shared with <it>Nesospiza</it>, and these alleles were found in all three <it>Nesospiza</it> sequence groups in the gene tree, suggesting that most of the observed variation predates their phylogenetic split.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Conclusions</p>
					</st><p>Lack of evidence of selection on the PBR, together with shared polymorphism across the gene tree, suggests that population variation of MHCII&#223; among <it>Nesospiza</it> and <it>Rowettia</it> is due to ancestral polymorphism rather than local selective forces. Weak or no selection pressure could be attributed to low parasite load at these isolated Atlantic islands. The deep divergence between the highly supported <it>Nesospiza</it>-specific sequence Groups 2 and 3, and the clustering of Group 3 close to the distantly related passerines, provide strong support for preserved ancestral polymorphism, and present evidence of one of the rare cases of extensive ancestral polymorphism in birds.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
		</abs>
	</fm>
	<bdy>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Background</p>
			</st><p>Understanding the principals that govern the generation and maintenance of functional genetic diversity is fundamental to evolutionary biology. Large reductions in population size, through bottleneck or founder events, result in a loss of genetic diversity <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> which may affect the ability of populations to adapt and survive in changing environments <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. However, genes of ecological adaptive importance may maintain variation through a severe reduction in population size through processes such as balancing selection <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) is such a functional locus, and has been extensively studied in both model and non-model species <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>The MHC is a multigene family involved in the vertebrate immune response <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, and is the most polymorphic set of genes known in vertebrates <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. MHC variation is driven by an arms race between host and pathogen, where balancing selection maintains alleles in the population. An extensive repertoire of alleles enables the population to respond rapidly to changing or novel pathogens <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The highly variable peptide binding region (PBR) encoded by MHC class II &#223; exon 2 (MHCII&#223;) ensures the binding of a large number of conformationally different peptides <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The PBR of MHC molecules is involved in antigen recognition and as such may be under strong balancing selection when compared with the non-PBR sites <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Although the major driving force behind MHC diversity is host-pathogen co-evolution <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, sexual selection and selection against deleterious mutations also play a role in the maintenance of MHC variation <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>Like many multi-gene families, MHC is governed by the birth-and-death model of evolution where new genes are generated through gene duplication. Some of these genes are maintained for long periods and even through population divergence events, while others lose function (pseudogenes) or are lost completely. MHC variation is also governed by gene conversion, where homologous recombination occurs between duplicated genes (paralogous genes), thus homogenising sequences between different loci <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. In passerine birds, the MHC is characterised by multiple gene copies, pseudogenes and long introns, and is exceptionally diverse and complex compared to other birds and vertebrate species <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Gene duplication events of MHC can be traced phylogenetically in most lineages, because duplicated genes evolve independently. This can be seen in the phylogenetic grouping of orthologous genes, rather than in a species-specific grouping <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Alternatively, recent duplication and concerted evolution of genes (through gene conversion) can result in species-specific clustering <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Due to the high rate of gene duplication and loss, and the confounding effect of gene conversion, it is notoriously difficult to re-construct avian MHC phylogenies <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>Following a bottleneck or founder event, the genetic diversity of a population is reduced to only a subset of the original variation. As the population adapts to its new environment, the MHC allelic diversity will be made up of a combination of ancestral polymorphism and novel genetic variation. Trans-species evolution <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> or ancestral polymorphism <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B28">28</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> refers to the long-term maintenance of ancestral alleles in populations and species <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B29">29</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B30">30</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. This process is governed by balancing selection <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B31">31</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> and is seen when related species or subspecies share similar or the same MHC alleles despite local selection pressure. This pattern is common in mammals which do not often show concerted evolution, thus orthologous loci can be recognized between distantly related taxa such as mice and humans <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The high levels of concerted evolution in birds often make it difficult to distinguish between orthologous and paralogous loci <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, although isolated cases have been reported e.g. <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Novel genetic diversity is introduced in populations either through dispersal or mutations. Mutational processes include gene duplication, point mutations and gene conversion e.g. <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Gene conversion is known to occur frequently in birds at the highly duplicated MHC genes <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The rate of gene conversion has been shown to be far greater than that of point mutations, thus may be a very important mechanism for generation of variation in bottlenecked populations <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>In the present study, we assess MHC variation in the <it>Nesospiza</it> bunting species complex and its putative sister taxon, <it>Rowettia goughensis</it>. Evaluation of the MHC in <it>Nesospiza</it> and <it>R. goughensis</it> is interesting for several reasons. <it>Nesospiza</it> and <it>R. goughensis</it> are considered sister taxa and are presumed to have arrived at Tristan da Cunha and nearby Gough Island with the same colonization event <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Mitochondrial <it>cytochrome b</it> sequences are reciprocally monophyletic between island systems, and neutral microsatellite markers show substantial genetic differentiation between species <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. It is thus interesting to compare the MHC differentiation and allele sharing in <it>Nesospiza</it> and <it>R. goughensis</it> and determine the level of ancestral polymorphism between these species. Further, <it>Nesospiza</it> buntings have undergone an ecological adaptive radiation in parallel on two islands <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Both Nightingale and Inaccessible islands are inhabited by large- and small-billed <it>Nesospiza</it> buntings. The two species on Nightingale Island (<it>N. questi and N. wilkinsi</it>) co-occur with little, if any, interbreeding, probably due to the availability of two discrete seed sizes within a single habitat. Inaccessible Island has three lineages of <it>N. acunhae</it> buntings: large-billed <it>N. a. dunnei</it>, and two colour morphs of the small-billed bunting, <it>N. a. fraseri</it> and <it>N. a. acunhae</it>
				<abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B39">39</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Hybridisation occurs between all three forms across an ecotone on the eastern plateau of Inaccessible Island. This is probably due to a large variation of seed sizes occurring at low densities, which favours greater diversity in bill-sizes <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. A single <it>Nesospiza</it> species inhabited the main island of Tristan, but was driven to extinction shortly after the arrival of humans at the archipelago. Genetic structure analysis based on neutral microsatellite markers show little or no hybridization between species on Nightingale, and strong differentiation between Nightingale <it>Nesospiza</it> and those on Inaccessible Island <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Despite ongoing hybridization on Inaccessible Island, a strong association has been found between bill morphology, habitat choice and genetic differentiation suggesting that both natural and sexual selection may maintain differentiation <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Thus, it is possible that these selective pressures will result in species-specific patterns of MHC variation. However, an alternative hypothesis is that balancing selection has maintained most of the MHC variation across the species complex. Here we aim to 1) test for signatures of selection at the MHCII&#223; in <it>Nesospiza</it> buntings, and 2) investigate the extent of ancestral polymorphism between <it>Nesospiza,</it> its putative sister taxon <it>Rowettia goughensis</it>, and other passerine species <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B40">40</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B41">41</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Results</p>
			</st>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>PCR amplification success and nucleotide diversity</p>
				</st><p>In total, 508 sequences of expected length (159&#8201;bp) were obtained from 14 <it>Nesospiza</it> from the Tristan da Cunha archipelago (10 from Inaccessible and 4 from Nightingale) and two <it>Rowettia goughensis</it> from Gough Island (see Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). Only sequences that were found in two or more individuals were included (396 sequences), and among these, 23 unique alleles were identified (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>; Additional file <supplr sid="S1">1</supplr> Table S1). Since the MHC complex contains several paralogous loci, alleles cannot be assigned to a particular locus. This prevents the use of the standard nomenclature of MHC alleles <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B42">42</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, and therefore alleles were named <it>Neso01</it> &#8211; <it>Neso23</it>. No stop codons or frameshift mutations were present in any of these alleles, although one of the sequences (<it>Neso02</it>) contained an in-frame two codon insert, resulting in a 165&#8201;bp sequence. BLAST analysis indicated high similarity (87-96%, with coverage of 80-98%) of 21 alleles (<it>Neso01- Neso21</it>) to functional passerine MHCII alleles, whereas <it>Neso22</it> and <it>Neso23</it> had higher similarity (92-93%, with 98% coverage) to passerine pseudogenes.</p>
				<suppl id="S1">
					<title>
						<p>Additional file 1</p>
					</title>
					<text>
						<p>
							<b>Table S1. </b>List of 23 major histocompatibility complex class II &#223; (MHCII&#223;) exon 2 <it>Nesospiza</it> bunting sequences used in the present study.</p>
					</text>
					<file name="1471-2148-12-143-S1.docx">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
				</suppl>
				<fig id="F1"><title><p>Figure 1</p></title><caption><p>Geographic location, vegetational composition, and <it>Nesospiza</it> populations occurring at the Tristan da Cunha archipelago</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Geographic location, vegetational composition, and </b><b><it>Nesospiza </it></b><b>populations occurring at the Tristan da Cunha archipelago.</b> Location of the Tristan da Cunha archipelago in the South Atlantic Ocean with the three main islands: Tristan, Inaccessible, and Nightingale. The vegetational composition, and occurring species and morpho-types of <it>Nesospiza</it> buntings are shown for Inaccessible and Nightingale islands (adapted from reference 37 and Google Maps).</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2148-12-143-1"/></fig>
				<fig id="F2"><title><p>Figure 2</p></title><caption><p><it>Nesospiza</it> MHCII&#946; gene tree.</p></caption><text>
   <p><b><it>Nesospiza </it></b><b>MHCII&#946; gene tree.</b> Neighbour-Joining tree showing the three well supported <it>Nesospiza</it> MHCII&#946; exon 2 allele clusters. Of the 23 alleles, 21 were found in the <it>N. acunhae</it> individuals on Inaccessible Island (<it>Neso1-8</it>, <it>10</it>&#8211;<it>13</it>, <it>15</it>&#8211;<it>23</it>), 14 in the <it>N. wilkinsi</it> and <it>N. questi</it> on Nightingale (<it>Neso1, 3, 4, 7, 9, 11, 13&#8211;15, 17, 18, 20, 22, 23</it>), and 7 in <it>R. goughensis</it> (<it>Neso5, 9, 13&#8211;15, 17, 23</it>). Bootstrap support &lt;70% are not shown.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2148-12-143-2"/></fig><p>Each individual <it>Nesospiza</it> contained 3&#8211;7 unique presumably functional (i.e. excluding known pseudogenes <it>Neso22</it> and <it>Neso23</it>) alleles of MHCII&#946; (average&#8201;&#177;&#8201;SD: 4.63&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.99). Assuming all loci to be heterozygous, the minimum number of MHCII&#946; loci that must be present in <it>Nesospiza</it> is four. This is similar to what has been observed in most passerine species (3&#8211;7 loci), with the exception of common yellowthroat (<it>Geothlypis trichas</it>) (20 loci), which has particularly high levels of gene duplication <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B43">43</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. A regression analysis performed to determine if the number of alleles sampled approached the maximum for each individual showed that the number of alleles did not plateau for 13 of the 16 individuals as the number of sequence clones increased (data not shown); thus, it is likely that more than four MHCII&#946; loci are present in <it>Nesospiza</it>.</p><p>Of the 23 alleles, 21 were found in the <it>N. acunhae</it> individuals on Inaccessible Island (<it>Neso1-8</it>, <it>10</it>&#8211;<it>13</it>, <it>15</it>&#8211;<it>23</it>), 14 in the <it>N. wilkinsi</it> and <it>N. questi</it> on Nightingale (<it>Neso1, 3, 4, 7, 9, 11, 13&#8211;15, 17, 18, 20, 22, 23</it>), and 7 in <it>R. goughensis</it> (<it>Neso5, 9, 13&#8211;15, 17, 23</it>). The nucleotide diversity (&#960;) of putatively functional alleles (i.e. excluding the pseodogenes, <it>Neso22</it> and <it>Neso23</it>) was 0.11 in <it>N. acunhae</it> on Inaccessible Island (data from 19 alleles in 10 individuals), 0.11 in <it>N. wilkinsi</it> on Nightingale (data from 8 alleles in 2 individuals), and 0.07 in <it>N. questi</it>on Nightingale (data from 7 alleles in 2 individuals). The nucleotide diversity (0.04) found in <it>R. goughensis</it> (data from the 6 alleles in 2 individuals)<it>.</it>
				</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Selection and recombination</p>
				</st><p>The PBR was identified after alignment with the human HLA-DRB*04 amino acid sequence. Traditional selection statistics did not uncover any statistically significant selection patterns (Tajima&#8217;s D&#8201;=&#8201;0.61, p&#8201;&gt;&#8201;0.10; Fu &amp; Li&#8217;s D*&#8201;=&#8201;0.30, p&#8201;&gt;&#8201;0.10; Fu &amp; Li&#8217;s&#8201;F*&#8201;=&#8201;0.46, p&#8201;&gt;&#8201;0.10). The sampled populations showed no evidence of selection at the either the PBR or non-PBR regions (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). Null models were supported by likelihood ratio tests, with only one site likely to be under positive selection (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>). Tests for recombination in RDP3 Beta 27 revealed no significant recombination events.</p>
				<table id="T1">
					<title>
						<p>Table 1</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>
							<b>Proportion of non-synonymous (d</b>
							<sub>
								<b>N</b>
							</sub><b>) and synonymous (d</b>
							<sub>
								<b>S</b>
							</sub><b>) substitutions in MHCII&#946; sequences of </b><b>
								<it>Nesospiza </it>
							</b><b>and other passerines</b>
						</p>
					</caption>
					<tgroup align="left" cols="10">
						<colspec align="left" colname="c1" colnum="1" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="left" colname="c2" colnum="2" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="left" colname="c3" colnum="3" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="left" colname="c4" colnum="4" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="left" colname="c5" colnum="5" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="left" colname="c6" colnum="6" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="left" colname="c7" colnum="7" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="left" colname="c8" colnum="8" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="left" colname="c9" colnum="9" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="left" colname="c10" colnum="10" colwidth="1*"/>
						<thead valign="top">
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2"/>
								<entry colname="c3" nameend="c6" namest="c3" rowsep="1">
									<p>
										<b>PBR</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7" nameend="c10" namest="c7" rowsep="1">
									<p>
										<b>Non-PBR</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>
										<b>Comparisons</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>
										<b>N</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>
										<b>d</b>
										<sub>
											<b>N</b>
										</sub><b>(&#177;SE)</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>
										<b>d</b>
										<sub>
											<b>S</b>
										</sub><b>(&#177;SE)</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>
										<b>d</b>
										<sub>
											<b>N</b>
										</sub><b>/d</b>
										<sub>
											<b>S</b>
										</sub>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>
										<b>z-test</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>
										<b>d</b>
										<sub>
											<b>N</b>
										</sub><b>(&#177;SE)</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>
										<b>d</b>
										<sub>
											<b>S</b>
										</sub><b>(&#177;SE)</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>
										<b>d</b>
										<sub>
											<b>N</b>
										</sub><b>/d</b>
										<sub>
											<b>S</b>
										</sub>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>
										<b>z-test</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
						</thead>
						<tfoot>
							<p>
								<b>References: New Zealand and Chatham Island robins</b>
								<abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>, <b>Hawaiian honeycreepers</b>
								<abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B46">46</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>, <b>common yellowthroat</b>
								<abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B43">43</abbr>
								</abbrgrp><b>;* Values were calculated from GenBank sequences, <sup>&#450;</sup> Does not include the putative pseudogenes <it>Neso22</it> and <it>Neso23</it>, N&#8201;=&#8201;Number of MHC sequences; Brown <it>et al.</it>
								</b>
								<abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B44">44</abbr>
								</abbrgrp><b>: PBR&#8201;=&#8201;14 amino acids, non-PBR&#8201;=&#8201;41 amino acids; Tong <it>et al.</it>
								</b>
								<abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B45">45</abbr>
								</abbrgrp><b>: PBR&#8201;=&#8201;9 amino acids, non&#8201;=&#8201;PBR&#8201;=&#8201;46 amino acids.</b>
							</p>
						</tfoot>
						<tbody valign="top">
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Brown <it>et al.</it>
										<abbrgrp>
											<abbr bid="B44">44</abbr>
										</abbrgrp>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2"/>
								<entry colname="c3"/>
								<entry colname="c4"/>
								<entry colname="c5"/>
								<entry colname="c6"/>
								<entry colname="c7"/>
								<entry colname="c8"/>
								<entry colname="c9"/>
								<entry colname="c10"/>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>
										<it>Neso01-23</it>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>23</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.377 (&#177;0.146)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.236 (&#177;0.161)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>1.60</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>n.s. (0.54)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.133 (&#177;0.029)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.114 (&#177;0.051)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>1.17</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s. (0.74)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>
										<it>Neso01-21 &#450;</it>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>21</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.372 (&#177;0.142)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.234 (&#177;0.174)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>1.59</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>n.s. (0.59)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.090 (&#177;0.022)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.097 (&#177;0.047)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>0.93</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s. (0.90)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Group1</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>2</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.031 (&#177;0.031)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.000 (&#177;0.000)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>n/a</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>n.s. (0.33)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.011 (&#177;0.011)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.039 (&#177;0.040)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>0.28</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s. (0.51)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Group2</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>15</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.009 (&#177;0.006)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.000 (&#177;0.000)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>n/a</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>n.s. (0.16)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.028 (&#177;0.007)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.042 (&#177;0.030)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>0.67</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s. (0.68)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Group3</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>6</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.073 (&#177;0.033)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.036 (&#177;0.049)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>2.03</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>n.s. (0.51)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.023 (&#177;0.010)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.014 (&#177;0.014)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>1.64</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s. (0.62)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Inaccessible <it>&#450;</it>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>19</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.361 (&#177;0.133)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.222 (&#177;0.149)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>1.63</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>n.s. (0.53)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.135 (&#177;0.026)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.115 (&#177;0.050)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>1.17</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s. (0.74)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Nightingale <it>&#450;</it>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>12</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.420 (&#177;0.151)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.281 (&#177;0.192)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>1.49</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>n.s. (0.60)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.166 (&#177;0.034)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.118 (&#177;0.055)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>1.41</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s. (0.43)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Tristan da Cunha <it>&#450;</it>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>21</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.377 (&#177;0.146)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.236 (&#177;0.161)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>1.60</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>n.s. (0.54)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.133 (&#177;0.029)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.114 (&#177;0.051)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>1.17</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s. (0.74)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>
										<it>Rowettia goughensis</it>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>6</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.486 (&#177;0.188)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.351 (&#177;0.246)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>2.59</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>n.s. (0.70)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.194 (&#177;0.040)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.135 (&#177;0.063)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>1.44</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s. (0.40)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Tong <it>et al.</it>
										<abbrgrp>
											<abbr bid="B45">45</abbr>
										</abbrgrp>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="char" char="." colname="c2"/>
								<entry colname="c3"/>
								<entry colname="c4"/>
								<entry colname="c5"/>
								<entry colname="c6"/>
								<entry colname="c7"/>
								<entry colname="c8"/>
								<entry colname="c9"/>
								<entry colname="c10"/>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>
										<it>Neso01-23</it>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>23</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.230 (&#177;0.090)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.125 (&#177;0.159)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>1.84</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>n.s. (0.61)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.174 (&#177;0.033)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.143 (&#177;0.051)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>1.22</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s. (0.61)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>
										<it>Neso01-21 &#450;</it>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>21</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.100 (&#177;0.054)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.090 (&#177;0.147)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>0.11</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>n.s. (0.96)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.151 (&#177;0.032)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.135 (&#177;0.055)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>1.12</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s. (0.79)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Group1</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>2</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.053 (&#177;0.052)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.000 (&#177;0.000)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>n/a</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>n.s. (0.33)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.053 (&#177;0.053)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.000 (&#177;0.000)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>n/a</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s. (0.32)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Group2</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>15</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.018 (&#177;0.019)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.000 (&#177;0.000)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>n/a</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>n.s. (0.38)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.024 (&#177;0.006)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.033 (&#177;0.025)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>0.73</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s. (0.73)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Group3</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>6</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.033 (&#177;0.022)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.000 (&#177;0.000)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>n/a</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>n.s. (0.14)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.036 (&#177;0.013)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.024 (&#177;0.017)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>1.50</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s. (0.58)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Inaccessible <it>&#450;</it>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>19</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.240 (&#177;0.091)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.126 (&#177;0.165)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>1.90</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>n.s. (0.57)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.171 (&#177;0.032)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.139 (&#177;0.049)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>1.13</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s. (0.59)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Nightingale <it>&#450;</it>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>12</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.306 (&#177;0.124)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.152 (&#177;0.189)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>2.01</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>n.s. (0.54)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.204 (&#177;0.038)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.152 (&#177;0.058)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>1.34</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s. (0.44)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Tristan da Cunha <it>&#450;</it>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>21</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.230 (&#177;0.090)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.125 (&#177;0.159)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>1.84</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>n.s. (0.61)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.174 (&#177;0.033)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.143 (&#177;0.051)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>1.22</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s. (0.61)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>
										<it>Rowettia goughensis</it>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>6</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.334 (&#177;0.123)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.163 (&#177;0.189)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>2.05</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>n.s. (0.52)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.238 (&#177;0.045)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.186 (&#177;0.069)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>1.28</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s. (0.49)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>New Zealand robin</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>41</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.339 (&#177;0.078)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.094 (&#177;0.059)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>3.6</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>&lt;0.005</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.076 (&#177;0.019)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.039 (&#177;0.013)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>1.95</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s.</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Chatham Island robin</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>4</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.373 (&#177;0.086)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.135 (&#177;0.078)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>2.76</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>&lt;0.05</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.099 (&#177;0.024)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.020 (&#177;0.014)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>5.05</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>&lt;0.005</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Hawaiian honeycreepers</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>51</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.341 (&#177;0.103)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.076 (&#177;0.095)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>4.49</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>&lt;0.001</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.121 (&#177;0.038)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.092 (&#177;0.053)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>1.32</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s.</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Common yellowthroat</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>39</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.608 (&#177;0.120)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.211 (&#177;0.111)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>2.88</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>&lt;0.05</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.135 (&#177;0.034)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.137 (&#177;0.034)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>0.99</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s.</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>House sparrow<it>*</it>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>12</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>0.470 (&#177;0.109)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>0.123 (&#177;0.095)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>3.82</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>&lt;0.0001</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c7">
									<p>0.203 (&#177;0.047)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c8">
									<p>0.200 (&#177;0.051)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c9">
									<p>1.02</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c10">
									<p>n.s.</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
						</tbody>
					</tgroup>
				</table>
				<table id="T2">
					<title>
						<p>Table 2</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>
							<b>Parameter estimates and results from four selection models as implemented in CODEML</b>
						</p>
					</caption>
					<tgroup align="left" cols="4">
						<colspec align="left" colname="c1" colnum="1" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="left" colname="c2" colnum="2" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="left" colname="c3" colnum="3" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="left" colname="c4" colnum="4" colwidth="1*"/>
						<thead>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>
										<b>Model</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>
										<b>Log-likelihood</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>
										<b>Parameter estimates</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>
										<b>Positively selected sites</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>M1a (nearly neutral)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>&#8722;576.502</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>p<sub>0</sub>&#8201;=&#8201;0.385, p1&#8201;=&#8201;0.615, &#969;0&#8201;=&#8201;0.038,</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>Not allowed</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2"/>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>&#969;1&#8201;=&#8201;1.000</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4"/>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>M2a (positive selection)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>&#8722;574.685</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>p<sub>0</sub>&#8201;=&#8201;0.311, p1&#8201;=&#8201;0.628, p2&#8201;=&#8201;0.061 ,</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>None</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2"/>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>&#969;0&#8201;=&#8201;0.000, &#969;1&#8201;=&#8201;1.000 , &#969;2&#8201;=&#8201;4.847</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4"/>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>M7 (beta)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>&#8722;576.474</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>p&#8201;=&#8201;0.033, q&#8201;=&#8201;0.018</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>Not allowed</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>M8 (beta and omega)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>&#8722;574.720</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>p<sub>0</sub>&#8201;=&#8201;0.941, p1&#8201;=&#8201;0.059, p&#8201;=&#8201;0.028,</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>37&#8201;N</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2"/>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>q&#8201;=&#8201;0.015, &#969;&#8201;=&#8201;4.612</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4"/>
							</row>
						</tbody>
					</tgroup>
				</table>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Phylogenetic analysis</p>
				</st><p>A consensus Neighbour-Joining tree of the 23 <it>Nesospiza</it> alleles showed three highly supported groups, called <it>Nesospiza</it> Group 1 &#8211; 3 (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>). The same three <it>Nesospiza</it> groups were highly supported within genealogies for passerine MHCII&#946; reconstructed from exon 2 sequences using Bayesian inference (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>). Group 1, containing the <it>Neso22</it> and <it>Neso23</it>, and a red-winged blackbird pseudogene (<it>Agelaius phoeniceus</it>; APAF030990), form a highly supported, diverged cluster. A second red-winged blackbird pseudogene (APAF030994) and a vegetarian finch (<it>Platyspiza crassirostris</it>) pseudogene (PCAY064469), however, group with other presumably functional passerine MHC sequences.</p>
				<fig id="F3"><title><p>Figure 3</p></title><caption><p>Passerine MHCII&#946; gene tree.</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Passerine MHCII&#946; gene tree.</b> Gene tree of the MHCII&#946; exon 2 sequences of <it>Nesospiza</it> and sequences of several other passerine species obtained from GenBank. A Bayesian analysis of 159&#8201;bp of sequences, with independent mutational models applied to each codon position (Position 1: TIM3ef&#8201;+&#8201;I&#8201;+&#8201;G; Position 2: TVM&#8201;+&#8201;G; Position 3: TPM2uf&#8201;+&#8201;G). Bayesian posterior probabilities are indicated at the nodes; values&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.95 are not shown.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2148-12-143-3"/></fig><p>Group 2 (<it>Neso01-13, 20&#8211;21</it>) is distinct and appears to be a well-supported cluster of presumably functional MHC alleles unique to <it>Nesospiza</it> and <it>R. goughensis</it>. Group 3 (<it>Neso14-19</it>), which also contains sequences shared by <it>Nesospiza</it> and <it>R. goughensis,</it> is well supported, but clusters more closely with sequences from the distantly related common yellowthroat, New Zealand robin (<it>Petroica australis</it>), Chatham Island robin (<it>Petroica traverse</it>), Florida scrub jay (<it>Aphelocoma coerulescens</it>) and vegetarian finch. Of the other passerine species, zebra finch, Florida scrub jay, and little greenbul (<it>Andropadus virens;</it> with the exception of one sample) cluster by species or, in the case of New Zealand and Chatham Island robins (Petroica australis), with sister species. Sequences of the great reed warbler (<it>Acrocephalus arundinaceus</it>) are scattered throughout the phylogeny as small groups or single alleles, apart from one supported group divergent from most other passerine sequences. The sequences of several passerines, namely house finch (<it>Carpodacus mexicanus</it>), vegetarian finch, red-winged blackbird, and common yellowthroat, cluster with those of other species throughout the phylogeny.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Discussion</p>
			</st><p>This study describes 23 MHCII&#223; alleles representing at least four functional loci and two pseudogenes in the <it>Nesospiza</it> bunting species complex. Many MHCII&#946; alleles were shared between <it>Nesospiza</it> taxa as well as between <it>Nesospiza</it> and its putative sister taxon <it>R. goughensis.</it> This pattern of ancestral polymorphism suggests that the observed gene duplications occurred prior to the phylogenetic split of the species, and subsequent unusually low selective pressure at the loci has prevented allelic divergence between species. The MHC nuclear genetic diversity in <it>Nesospiza</it> on Inaccessible (&#960;&#8201;=&#8201;0.11) was comparable to that of outbred passerine species (e.g. 0.15 in <it>Luscinia svecica</it>; <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>), and despite the low sample size for Nightingale, allele numbers and nucleotide diversity were higher than in the severely bottlenecked Chatham Island robin population (0.05) <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. We have screened 14 <it>Nesospiza</it> individuals for MHC variation, which is similar to some previous Passerine MHC studies using cloning and sequencing e.g. <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B43">43</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B47">47</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. However, because larger sample sizes would have been necessary to cover the variation of each population sufficiently, we will not discuss population-level MHC variation further.</p><p>Patterns of both ancestral polymorphism and concerted evolution among <it>Nesospiza</it> and <it>Rowettia</it> populations are evident from our results. Ancestral polymorphism, found here for <it>Nesospiza</it> and <it>R. goughensis</it>, as well as in other species (e.g. great reed warbler, house finch, vegetarian finch, red-winged blackbird and common yellowthroat), can be seen in the sharing of the same or similar alleles between species (Figures <figr fid="F2">2</figr> and <figr fid="F3">3</figr>). Of the 23 <it>Nesospiza</it> alleles, 15 were found in species from both islands. All seven alleles occurring in <it>R. goughensis</it> are shared with <it>Nesospiza</it> (<it>Neso5, 9, 13&#8211;15, 17, 23</it>) and these alleles are found in all three <it>Nesospiza</it> groups in the gene tree (Figures <figr fid="F2">2</figr> and <figr fid="F3">3</figr>). The estimated minimum number of putatively functional gene copies in <it>Nesospiza</it> (i.e. 4 loci) suggests that the three <it>Nesospiza</it> allele groups are not necessarily locus-specific, despite their divergent clustering. Group 3 may represent a single locus, since only one or two alleles from this cluster occur in each individual. However, this is not the case for <it>R. goughensis</it>, where three of these alleles occur in one individual. Two highly supported clusters are seen within Group 2 (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>), which is also the cluster containing the most alleles, suggesting that this cluster is likely to represent more than one gene copy. A likely explanation for the clustering of alleles from different gene loci is the genetic homogenization caused by gene duplication events with subsequent gene conversion.</p><p>The highly supported branches of sequences forming Groups 2 and 3 in the gene tree contain only <it>Nesospiza</it> and <it>R. goughensis</it> alleles. Although several species were included due to the similarity between their MHCII&#946; alleles and those of <it>Nesospiza</it>, the observed divergent clustering of Group 2sequences could be explained by a lack of closely related species in the analysis. Alternatively, the species-specific clustering of <it>Nesospiza</it> may be attributed to their long divergence time from the other passerines sampled <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B48">48</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The deep divergence of Groups 2 and 3, and the clustering of Group 3 close to the distantly related species of common yellowthroat, New Zealand robins, Florida scrub jay, and vegetarian finch, however, provide strong support for preserved ancestral polymorphism. These patterns suggest that extant MHC variation in <it>Nesospiza</it> and <it>R. goughensis</it> can be explained by shared ancestral polymorphism during colonisation which has since been maintained. It is possible that the additional variation has been generated by gene conversion events, which is the most likely method of generating variation from the few alleles remaining in a population following a population bottleneck <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>Amino acid sequences are more similar between Groups 1 and 3 (Figure <figr fid="F4">4</figr>). This could either represent evidence of recombination with the pseudogenes, producing a new group of functional sequences, or perhaps more likely indicate that the pseudogenes resulted from gene duplication events of Group 3 sequences. Copying errors during gene duplication and recombination events may result in non-functional genes (pseudogenes) and the subsequent lack of functional constraint on evolutionary processes (such as mutation) acting on the pseudogenes result in rapid sequence divergence <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B49">49</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. This is evidently the case for the two presumably non-functional alleles, <it>Neso22</it> and <it>Neso23</it>, which form a well supported group with a red-winged blackbird pseudogene, clustered sister to all the functional passerine sequences. However, some pseudogenes (e.g. red-winged blackbird APAF030994 and vegetarian finch PCAY064439) do not show evidence of rapid divergence (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>), perhaps due to ongoing recombination with functional genes that is leading to sequence conservation. Alternatively, there may have been insufficient time for the genes to become highly diverged since they became non-functional.</p>
			<fig id="F4"><title><p>Figure 4</p></title><caption><p>Assignment of <it>Nesospiza</it> MHCII&#946; peptide binding sites</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Assignment of </b><b><it>Nesospiza </it></b><b>MHCII&#946; peptide binding sites.</b> Alignment of MHCII&#946; exon 2 amino acid sequences of <it>Neso01 &#8211; 23</it> indicating amino acid differences between Groups 1&#8211;3 sequences. Amino acid identity is shown by &#8220;.&#8221; and an alignment gap by &#8220;-&#8221;. Alignment with human HLA-DRB*04 (GenBank accession: NM_021983) was used to assign peptide binding sites (*) according to Brown <it>et al.</it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B44">44</abbr></abbrgrp> and Tong <it>et al.</it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B45">45</abbr></abbrgrp></p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2148-12-143-4"/></fig><p>Selection tests showed no consistent evidences of balancing or positive selection at the PBR or non-PBR regions of MHCII&#946; exon 2 in <it>Nesospiza</it> and <it>Rowettia</it>. The short fragment length of our sequences excludes some of the PBR sites, and therefore there is a chance that some sites that may be under selection were excluded from the analyses. However, selection tests were done according to two different PBR characterizations <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B44">44</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B45">45</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, and tested on the entire data set as well as all species individually, and the three clusters independently. Ratios of d<sub>N</sub>/d<sub>S</sub> were non-significant in all cases (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>), and additional selection tests showed weak evidence of selection with only one site likely to be under positive selection (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>). New MHC variation can be generated by point mutations or through recombination between alleles, giving rise to a new allele <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The latter process, known as gene conversion, has been documented in some natural avian populations <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> and has been suggested to be essential in generating genetic variation at MHC after a bottleneck <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. During gene conversion events, synonymous substitutions may hitchhike with non-synonymous variation <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> and this may be a reason why d<sub>N</sub>/d<sub>S</sub> ration tests fail to detect positive selection. We found, however, no evidence of recombination in our data, but recombination can be difficult to verify with short sequences.</p><p>Despite the lack of significant evidence for selection, ratios of d<sub>N</sub>/d<sub>S</sub>&#8201;&gt;&#8201;1.0 that we observe in <it>Rowettia</it> and all <it>Nesospiza</it> populations indicate that the loci are under weak balancing selection, or perhaps more likely, that ancestral balancing selection acted on the loci before colonisation of the islands. Lack of strong positive selection may reflect a decreased pathogen load in both <it>Nesospiza</it> and <it>R. goughensis</it>. Passerines generally are less parasitised by lice and ectoparasites than other avian orders e.g. <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B50">50</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. This is particularly true of small populations on isolated oceanic islands (R Palma pers. comm.). <it>Myrsidea</it> lice occur at extremely low prevalence (6.4%) across 12 species of Darwin&#8217;s finches at the Gal&#225;pagos Islands <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B50">50</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. On Tristan da Cunha and Gough Island, different louse species (order Phthiraptera) have been found on 20 bird species, including the Tristan thrush (<it>Nesocichla eremita</it>) <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B51">51</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, yet careful inspection of <it>Nesospiza</it> buntings yielded no lice, with hippoboscid flies and feather mites the only ectoparasites (PG Ryan unpubl. data). The absence of parasites could be due to an uninfected founding population (&#8220;missing the boat&#8221;) <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B52">52</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, or subsequent extinction from the host after colonisation. The high level of ancestral polymorphism between <it>R. goughensis</it> and <it>Nesospiza</it> suggest that the former is more likely, where a single uninfected founding population colonization both Tristan da Cunha and Gough Island.</p><p>Some shortcomings of the cloning and sequencing method employed in the study may result in underestimation of MHC variation. Firstly, the large number of gene copies and the high level of convergence between loci make it difficult to amplify a single MHC locus at a time. Thus, most MHC studies on non-model vertebrates amplify alleles from multiple gene copies simultaneously. This increases the risk of chimera formation during the PCR, which in turn leads to overestimation of levels of gene recombination <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B53">53</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. In addition, PCR products are prone to point mutations e.g. <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B54">54</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, although these are relatively easy to detect since mutation rates are relatively low and are unlikely to occur in more than one sequence <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B55">55</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B56">56</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. In this study, we compensate for these problems by only accepting alleles that occur in at least two individuals e.g. <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B57">57</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B58">58</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Secondly, the amplification of a multi-gene family is necessarily problematic since not all loci and not all alleles at a locus will be detected using a single primers set. The primers employed in this study were designed for non locus-specific amplification of exon 2 of MHCII&#223; in zebra finch (<it>Taeniopygia guttata</it>) <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B59">59</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> and have been successfully employed in other passerine MHC studies (H Westerdahl pers. comm.). A regression analysis of the number of clones sequenced per individual found that more individuals and sequences will be necessary to estimate true MHC variation per individual. Finally, sequences were obtained for only half of the variable MHCII&#946; exon 2 gene. Although not all the variation has been analysed in this study, this is often the case with such complex multi-gene systems <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B58">58</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> and does not preclude our finding of ancestral polymorphism between species and within the <it>Nesospiza</it> species complex. More comprehensive studies of population level variation of MHC would require that more individuals and sequences were analysed. However, the present study focuses on selection and levels of shared polymorphism, and for such analyses the present data is sufficient.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Conclusions</p>
			</st><p>The extent of shared alleles and ancestral polymorphism between <it>Nesospiza</it> and <it>R. goughensis</it> suggests that both originated from the same colonization wave. We find that similar or the same alleles are maintained between species due to the recent species divergence and low levels of (local) selection acting on PBR. The additional variation found within the <it>Nesospiza</it> species complex may be due to gene conversion, which is likely the most prominent mechanism for generating new variation after a bottleneck event <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The extant genetic variation is not likely to change rapidly, unless there is a drastic geographic or environmental change leading to strong selection at the MHC. One such situation would be the introduction of pathogens, since populations with low MHC diversity are often more susceptible to novel pathogens <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B60">60</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. In the absence of strong selection, MHC is expected to diverge over time between islands and populations due to drift, with the generation of new haplotypes through point mutations or gene conversion. Ongoing gene flow between populations and subspecies on Inaccessible Island can maintain genetic variation to some extent. The potential role of MHC dependent sexual selection <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B61">61</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> to drive divergence between populations even further remains open to study, and would require wider sampling over the entire geographic range to cover the details of geographic- and species-specific variation.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Methods</p>
			</st>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Sampling</p>
				</st><p>Buntings were mist-netted or caught with hand nets at Inaccessible, Nightingale and Gough Islands during September 1999 &#8211; February 2000, with additional samples from Inaccessible Island collected in September &#8211; November 2004 <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. No extant <it>Nesospiza</it> species occur on Tristan Island. Brachial vein blood samples were collected and stored in EDTA or lysis buffer. Two to three individuals were chosen to represent each population (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>; Inaccessible: 3&#8201;<it>N. a. acunhae</it>, 2&#8201;<it>N. a. fraseri</it>, 2&#8201;<it>N. a. dunnei</it>, 3&#8201;<it>N. a</it>. hybrid; Nightingale: 2&#8201;<it>N. questi</it>, 2&#8201;<it>N. wilkinsi</it>; Gough Island: 2 <it>R. goughensis</it>).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>DNA extraction and amplification</p>
				</st><p>DNA was extracted from whole blood by standard phenol:chloroform methods [Sambrook]. The primers 2zffw1 (5&#8217; TGT CAC TTC AYK AAC GGC ACG GAG 3&#8217;) and 2zfrv1 (5&#8217; GTA GTG TGC CGG CAG TAC GTG TC 3&#8217;), previously designed for the zebra finch (<it>Taeniopygia guttata</it>) <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B59">59</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, were used to amplify 159&#8201;bp of MHCII&#223; exon 2. These primers are not locus-specific and amplify exon 2 of multiple copies of the MHCII&#223; gene. Amplifications were performed in 10&#8201;&#956;l volumes, each containing 5&#8201;&#956;l QIAGEN Multiplex PCR Master Mix, 10 pM of each primer, and 10&#8201;ng of template DNA. PCR cycling conditions involved an initial denaturing step of 15 minutes at 95C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 seconds at 94C, 1 minute 30 seconds at 64C and 1 minute 30 seconds at 72C.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Cloning and sequencing</p>
				</st><p>PCR products of all individuals were cloned using the TOPO TA Cloning<sup>&#174;</sup> kit (Invitrogen). Vectors (pCR<sup>&#174;</sup> 2.1-TOPO<sup>&#174;</sup>) with inserted PCR product were used to transform chemically competent <it>Escherichia coli</it> cells (OneShot<sup>&#174;</sup>), according to the manufacturer&#8217;s instructions. Transformed cells were cultured on S.O.C medium (Invitrogen) for one hour in a shaking incubator at 37C and then incubated overnight at 37C on LB-medium supplemented with 50&#8201;&#956;g/ml Ampicillin and 50&#8201;&#956;l of X-gal (40&#8201;mg/ml). For each sample 30 positive colonies were picked with a sterile toothpick, diluted in 100&#8201;&#956;l Sabax water (Adcock Ingram) and used directly as DNA template for PCR. Amplification reactions contained 2&#8201;&#956;l QIAGEN Multiplex Master Mix, 10 pM each of M13 forward and M13 reverse primers (included in the kit), and 2&#8201;&#956;l of the colony diluted in Sabax water. The same PCR cycling conditions were used as before (see above). All clones were sequenced in both directions on an ABI Prism 3100 capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems). A total of 12 &#8211; 29 clones were successfully sequenced per individual (average&#8201;=&#8201;22.88).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Data analysis</p>
				</st><p>Nucleotide sequences were edited and aligned using CLC Main Workbench 5.0.2 (CLC Bio). To avoid including false haplotypes due to artefacts arising during PCR (e.g. recombinant chimeric sequences), sequences were only accepted if they were present in two or more individuals <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B56">56</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B62">62</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> (396 of 508 sequences were accepted and these represented 23 different alleles; Additional file <supplr sid="S1">1</supplr> Table S1). Due to the large number of sequences excluded with this stringent method, we followed Anmarkrud <it>et al.</it>
					<abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> suggestion to identify additional true alleles and evaluated whether the excluded sequences were &gt;1.5% (~3&#8201;bp) different from any of the sequences that were identified as possible alleles. Only two of the excluded sequences differed with &gt;1.5% and since so few alleles would not affect the results we decided not to include them in the analyses.</p><p>The nucleotide diversity (&#960;) was calculated using DnaSP 5.0 <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B63">63</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. Sequences were verified as MHC alleles using the BLASTN 2.2.24 algorithm <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B64">64</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Of the 23 alleles identified, 21 (<it>Neso01 &#8211; 21</it>) showed high identity (87-96%, with coverage of 80-98%) to known passerine MHCII&#223; coding genes, and two alleles (<it>Neso22</it> and <it>Neso23</it>) showed high identity (92-93%, with 98% coverage) with passerine pseudogenes (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>). This suggests that <it>Neso22</it> and <it>Neso23</it> are non-functional, thus they were excluded from the selection tests.</p><p>A regression analysis was performed to determine if the number of sequences obtained for each individual effectively sampled the total number of alleles. For each individual, a random subset of the alleles obtained was sampled and the number of alleles in the subset counted. This was repeated 100 times each for a subset of 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 (restricted by the number of sequences obtained for each individual). As sampling approaches the maximum number of alleles in the population, the number of alleles found in increasing subset sizes will plateau.</p><p>Nucleotide positions associated with the PBR were assigned according to the PBR regions determined for the human antigen binding region by two different studies <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B44">44</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B45">45</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. Selection was tested using the ratio of nonsynonymous (d<sub>N</sub>) to synonymous (d<sub>S</sub>) substitutions (d<sub>N</sub>/d<sub>S</sub>&#8201;=&#8201;&#969;). Under strict neutrality d<sub>N</sub>&#8201;=&#8201;d<sub>S</sub>, while regions under balancing selection are expected to undergo more nonsynonymous substitutions and regions under directional selection more synonymous substitutions. The parameter &#969; was calculated in MEGA 4 <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B65">65</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> using the method of Nei and Gojobori <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B66">66</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> with Jukes Cantor corrections and 1000 bootstrap replicates. A z-test <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B66">66</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> was used to determine the probability of selection by comparing the selection parameter, &#969;, against a null hypothesis of strict neutrality (d<sub>N</sub>&#8201;=&#8201;d<sub>S</sub>). Standard selection tests (Tajima&#8217;s D, Fu &amp; Li&#8217;s&#8201;F* and Fu &amp; Li&#8217;s D*) were calculated in DnaSP 5 <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B63">63</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. Substitution rates, &#969;, and the probability of positive selection on PBR and non-PBR regions, were compared to results from New Zealand and Chatham Island robins (<it>Petroica australis</it> and <it>Petroica traverse</it>) <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, Hawaiian honeycreepers (<it>Drepanidinae</it>) <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B46">46</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, common yellowthroat (<it>Geothlypis trichas</it>) <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B43">43</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, and house sparrow (<it>Passer domesticus</it>; values calculated using sequences from GenBank).</p><p>In a second test of selection, the maximum likelihood method implemented in CODEML in the Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood package (PAML 3.14) <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B67">67</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B68">68</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, was used to identify the sites under selection. Likelihood ratio tests in CODEML were used to test neutral models and models of selection. In a first comparison, a neutral model M1a (&#969;<sub>0</sub>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;1, &#969;<sub>1</sub>&#8201;=&#8201;1) was tested against M2a, a model for positive selection (&#969;<sub>2</sub>&#8201;&gt;&#8201;1). Model M1a assumes that sites are either conserved or under purifying selection (i.e. removed from the population) (&#969;<sub>0</sub>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;1), or selectively neutral (&#969;<sub>1</sub>&#8201;=&#8201;1). Model M2a considers a third class of sites where sites may be under positive selection (&#969;<sub>2</sub>&#8201;&gt;&#8201;1). A second comparison tested a neutral model M7 (0&#8201;&lt;&#8201;&#969;&#8201;&lt;&#8201;1) against a model for positive selection, M8 (0&#8201;&lt;&#8201;&#969;&#8201;&lt;&#8201;1, &#969;&#8201;&gt;&#8201;1). Model M7 is based on a &#946; distribution and estimates &#969; as a value between 0 and 1. In M8, &#969; is estimated directly from the data for one class of sites which allows for &#969;&#8201;&gt;&#8201;1. Both these tests are used routinely to identify sites under selection <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B69">69</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. The best-fit model was determined using a likelihood ratio test for each model comparison, thus the likelihood of positive selection could be evaluated <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B70">70</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. The difference in likelihood values of the null model (M1a, M7) and the alternative model (M2a, M8) was compared with the &#967;<sup>2</sup> distribution. Degrees of freedom were calculated as the difference in the number of parameters for each test. The Bayes Empirical Bayes method, implemented in CODEML, was used to calculate the posterior probability for each site class for the M2a and M8 models. A site is likely to be under positive selection when the posterior mean of &#969;&#8201;&gt;&#8201;1 <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B68">68</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>.</p><p>To determine the phylogenetic relationship between the 23 <it>Nesospiza</it> alleles a Neighbour-Joining (NJ) tree was constructed in MEGA 4 <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B65">65</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> assuming homogenous substitution patterns among lineages and uniform rates among sites. A consensus tree was computed from 10 000 bootstrap replicates in MEGA 4 <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B65">65</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> using a 75% consensus cut-off value. All subsequent phylogenetic analyses were conducted in MrBayes v 3.1.2 <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B70">70</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. A concatenated data set comprising MHCII&#946; sequences from several passerines obtained from GenBank (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>) was analysed with all <it>Nesospiza</it> alleles (<it>Neso01</it> &#8211; <it>Neso23</it>). The passerine species most closely related to <it>Nesospiza</it>, chosen as the top ten hits for each <it>Nesospiza</it> allele using BLAST, and several other passerine species (chosen to represent passerine diversity), were used for the phylogenetic analyses. Sequences were only included if there was sequence alignment of more than 100&#8201;bp, thus some species (e.g. <it>Poephila acuticauda</it>) identified to be in the top ten closest matches to one of the <it>Nesospiza</it> alleles were not included. This cut-off was made to ensure a robust result from the phylogenetic analysis.</p><p>The best model for nucleotide substitution was chosen using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B71">71</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> as determined by jModelTest <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B72">72</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B73">73</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> for each codon position independently (Position 1: TIM3ef&#8201;+&#8201;I&#8201;+&#8201;G; Position 2: TVM&#8201;+&#8201;G; Position 3: TPM2uf&#8201;+&#8201;G). Divergent zebra finch sequences were chosen as a root for passerine MHCII&#946; <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B60">60</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. MrBayes was run for 3 million generations with four incrementally heated chains. Trees were sampled every 3 000 generations, with a 10% burn-in. A consensus tree and posterior probabilities were calculated from the sampled trees. The average standard deviation of split frequencies between two simultaneous runs was monitored to confirm convergence.</p><p>The RDP3 Beta 27 <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B74">74</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> package was used to test for signatures of recombination using multiple algorithms simultaneously: RDP <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B75">75</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, GENECONV <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B76">76</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, BootScan <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B77">77</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, MaxChi <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B78">78</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, Chimaera <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B79">79</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, and 3Seq <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B80">80</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. The default settings were used, and the significance level was set to 0.05. Bonferroni corrections were applied for multiple comparisons <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B81">81</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Additional material</p>
				</st><p>GenBank accession numbers of non-<it>Nesospiza</it> sequences used in the present study: L42334 - L42335, U23968 - U23969, U23967, U23970, U23971, AJ404371 - AJ404376, U24405, AY437900 - AY437912, AY428561 - AY428568, AY258333 - AY248335, AY428569, U23958 - U23966, U23972, U23973, U23975, XM_002192161, XM_002193356, XM_002196138, XM_002197722, XM_002198130, XM_002198161, XM_002199709, XM_ 002200257, AF165156 - AF165157, AF165159, Z74424 - Z74428, AY064425, AY064439, AY064451, GQ247601 - GQ247606, GQ247608 - GQ247609, GQ247613 - GQ247614, GQ247616 - GQ247622, GU390288 - GU390291, AY518171 - AY518183, AY583092 - AY583094.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Authors&#8217; contributions</p>
			</st><p>AJvR carried out the molecular lab work, statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript. BH, PB, and PGR conceived of the study and participated in its design. BH participated in the coordination of the study and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
		</sec>
	</bdy>
	<bm>
		<ack>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Acknowledgements</p>
				</st><p>We thank Coleen Moloney and Cliff Dorse for assistance with collecting samples, Helena Westerdahl for providing primers, and Martin Stervander for alignment and processing of sequence data. Ricardo Palma from the Museum of New Zealand, Te Papa Tongarewa, gave helpful comments based on his work on Phthiraptera in avian systems. This work received financial support from a European Union IRSES grant (PIRSES-GA-2008-230799) and South Africa/Sweden Bilateral funding (348-2008-6131) to Paulette Bloomer, Bengt Hansson, and Peter Ryan; and research grants from the Crafoord Foundation and the Swedish Research Council to Bengt Hansson.</p>
			</sec>
		</ack>
		<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>Parker: Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions</p></title><aug><au><snm>Dlugosch</snm><fnm>KM</fnm></au></aug><source>MolEcol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>17</volume><fpage>431</fpage><lpage>449</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>The role of genetic variation in adaptation and population persistence in a changing environment</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lande</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Shannon</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Evolution</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>50</volume><fpage>434</fpage><lpage>437</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/2410812</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Selection for heterozygotes in small populations</p></title><aug><au><snm>Robertson</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>1962</pubdate><volume>47</volume><fpage>1291</fpage><lpage>1300</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">1210407</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">13974344</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>Selection maintains MHC diversity through a natural population bottleneck</p></title><aug><au><snm>Oliver</snm><fnm>MK</fnm></au><au><snm>Piertney</snm><fnm>SB</fnm></au></aug><source>MolBiolE</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><note>in press</note></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Ancestral polymorphism in exon 2 of bluethroat (<it>Lusciniasvecica</it>) MHC class II B genes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Anmarkrud</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au><au><snm>Johnsen</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Bachmann</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Lifjeld</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>J EvolBiol</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>23</volume><fpage>1206</fpage><lpage>1217</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>The evolution of the major histocompatibility complex in birds</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hess</snm><fnm>CM</fnm></au><au><snm>Edwards</snm><fnm>SV</fnm></au></aug><source>Bioscience</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>52</volume><fpage>423</fpage><lpage>431</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0423:TEOTMH]2.0.CO;2</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Spatial pattern of MHC class II variation in the great snipe (<it>Gallinago media</it>)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ekblom</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>S&#230;ther</snm><fnm>SA</fnm></au><au><snm>Jacobsson</snm><fnm>PAR</fnm></au><au><snm>Fiske</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Sahlman</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Grahn</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>K&#229;l&#229;s</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au><au><snm>H&#246;glund</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>MolEcol</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>1439</fpage><lpage>1451</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B8"><aug><au><snm>Klein</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Natural history of the major histocompatibility complex</source><publisher>New York: John Wiley &amp; Sons</publisher><pubdate>1986</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>Population biology of antigen presentation by MHC class I molecules</p></title><aug><au><snm>Parham</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Ohta</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>Science</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>272</volume><fpage>67</fpage><lpage>74</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.272.5258.67</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8600539</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>SNP profile within the human major histocompatibility complex reveals an extreme interrupted level of nucleotide diversity</p></title><aug><au><snm>Gaudieri</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Dawkins</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au><au><snm>Habara</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Kulski</snm><fnm>JK</fnm></au><au><snm>Gojobori</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>Genome Res</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>10</volume><fpage>1579</fpage><lpage>1586</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1101/gr.127200</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">310975</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11042155</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>Enhanced immunological surveillance in mice heterozygous at the H-2 complex</p></title><aug><au><snm>Doherty</snm><fnm>PC</fnm></au><au><snm>Zinkernagel</snm><fnm>RM</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>1975</pubdate><volume>256</volume><fpage>50</fpage><lpage>52</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/256050a0</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">1079575</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Penn</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Potts</snm><fnm>WK</fnm></au></aug><source>Am Nat</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>153</volume><fpage>145</fpage><lpage>164</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1086/303166</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>How pathogens drive genetic diversity: MHC, mechanisms and misunderstandings</p></title><aug><au><snm>Spurgin</snm><fnm>LG</fnm></au><au><snm>Richardson</snm><fnm>DS</fnm></au></aug><source>Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>277</volume><fpage>979</fpage><lpage>988</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1098/rspb.2009.2084</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Polymorphism and balancing selection at major histocompatibility loci</p></title><aug><au><snm>Takahata</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Satta</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Klein</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>1992</pubdate><volume>130</volume><fpage>925</fpage><lpage>938</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">1204941</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">1582567</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) heterozygote superiority to natural multi-parasite infections in the water vole (<it>Arvicolaterrestris</it>)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Oliver</snm><fnm>MK</fnm></au><au><snm>Telfer</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Piertney</snm><fnm>SB</fnm></au></aug><source>Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>276</volume><fpage>1119</fpage><lpage>1128</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1098/rspb.2008.1525</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>The scent of genetic compatibility: sexual selection and the major histocompatibility complex</p></title><aug><au><snm>Penn</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Ethology</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>108</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>21</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00768.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><title><p>MHC-based patterns of social and extra-pair mate choice in the Seychelles warbler</p></title><aug><au><snm>Richardson</snm><fnm>DS</fnm></au><au><snm>Komdeur</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Burke</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>von Schantz</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>Proc R Soc B</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>272</volume><fpage>759</fpage><lpage>767</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1098/rspb.2004.3028</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1602051</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15870038</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>A new theory of MHC evolution: beyond selection on the immune genes</p></title><aug><au><snm>van Oosterhout</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Proc R Soc B</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>276</volume><fpage>657</fpage><lpage>665</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1098/rspb.2008.1299</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2660941</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18986972</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>Concerted and birth-and-death evolution of multigene families</p></title><aug><au><snm>Nei</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Rooney</snm><fnm>AP</fnm></au></aug><source>Annu Rev Genet</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>39</volume><fpage>121</fpage><lpage>152</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.112240</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1464479</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16285855</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B20"><title><p>Dynamics of MHC evolution in birds and crocodilians: amplification of class II genes with degenerate primers</p></title><aug><au><snm>Edwards</snm><fnm>SV</fnm></au><au><snm>Grahn</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Potts</snm><fnm>WK</fnm></au></aug><source>MolEcol</source><pubdate>1995</pubdate><volume>4</volume><fpage>719</fpage><lpage>729</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p>Mhc diversity in two passerine birds: no evidence for a minimal essential Mhc</p></title><aug><au><snm>Westerdahl</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Wittzell von Schantz</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Immunogenetics</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>52</volume><fpage>92</fpage><lpage>100</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s002510000256</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11132162</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B22"><title><p>Extremely high MHC class I variation in a population of a long-distance migrant, the Scarlet Rosefinch (<it>Carpodacuserythrinus</it>)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Promerov&#225;</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Albrecht</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Bryja</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Immunogenetics</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>61</volume><fpage>451</fpage><lpage>461</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00251-009-0375-x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19452149</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B23"><title><p>Evolution by the birth-and-death process in multigene families of the vertebrate immune system</p></title><aug><au><snm>Nei</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Gu</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Sitnikova</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>PNAS</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>94</volume><fpage>7799</fpage><lpage>7806</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.94.15.7799</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">33709</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9223266</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B24"><title><p>Locus specificity of polymorphic alleles and evolution by a birth-and-death process in mammalian MHC genes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Gu</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Nei</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>MolBiolEvol</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>147</fpage><lpage>156</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B25"><title><p>Concerted evolution of two MHC class II B loci in pheasants and domestic chickens</p></title><aug><au><snm>Witzell</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Bernot</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Auffrey</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Zoorob</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>MolBiolEvol</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>479</fpage><lpage>490</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B26"><title><p>Gene conversion rapidly generates histocompatibility complex diversity in recently founded bird populations</p></title><aug><au><snm>Spurgin</snm><fnm>LG</fnm></au><au><snm>van Oosterhout</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Illera</snm><fnm>JC</fnm></au><au><snm>Bridgett</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Gharbi</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Emerson</snm><fnm>BC</fnm></au><au><snm>Richardson</snm><fnm>DS</fnm></au></aug><source>MolEcol</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>20</volume><fpage>5213</fpage><lpage>5225</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B27"><title><p>Allelic genealogy under overdominant and frequency-dependent selection and polymorphism of Major Histocompatibility Complex loci</p></title><aug><au><snm>Takahata</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Nei</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>1990</pubdate><volume>124</volume><fpage>967</fpage><lpage>978</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">1203987</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">2323559</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B28"><title><p>Origin of Major Histocompatibility Complex polymorphism &#8211; the transspecies hypothesis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Klein</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Hum Immunol</source><pubdate>1987</pubdate><volume>19</volume><fpage>155</fpage><lpage>162</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0198-8859(87)90066-8</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">3305436</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B29"><title><p>MHC polymorphism in the MHC class II of a non-passerine bird, the great snipe (<it>Gallinago media</it>)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Figueroa</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Gunther</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Klein</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>1988</pubdate><volume>335</volume><fpage>265</fpage><lpage>267</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/335265a0</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">3137477</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B30"><title><p>HLA-A and HLA-B polymorphism predate the divergence of human and chimpanzees</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lawlor</snm><fnm>DA</fnm></au><au><snm>Ward</snm><fnm>FE</fnm></au><au><snm>Ennis</snm><fnm>PD</fnm></au><au><snm>Jackson</snm><fnm>AP</fnm></au><au><snm>Parham</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>1988</pubdate><volume>335</volume><fpage>268</fpage><lpage>271</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/335268a0</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">3412487</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B31"><title><p>MHC studies in nonmodel vertebrates: what have we learned about natural selection in 15&#8201;years?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bernatchez</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Landry</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>J Evolution Biol</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>363</fpage><lpage>377</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00531.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B32"><title><p>MHC diversity in two Acrocephalus species: the outbred great reed warbler and the inbred Seychelles warbler</p></title><aug><au><snm>Richardson</snm><fnm>DS</fnm></au><au><snm>Westerdahl</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>MolEcol</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>12</volume><fpage>3523</fpage><lpage>3529</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B33"><title><p>The evolution of MHC diversity: Evidence of intralocus gene conversion and recombination in a single-locus system</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bahr</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Wilson</snm><fnm>AB</fnm></au></aug><source>Gene</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>497</volume><fpage>52</fpage><lpage>57</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.gene.2012.01.017</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">22301266</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B34"><title><p>Gene duplication and gene conversion in class II MHC genes of New Zealand robins (Petroicidae)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Miller</snm><fnm>HC</fnm></au><au><snm>Lambert</snm><fnm>DM</fnm></au></aug><source>Immunogenetics</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>56</volume><fpage>178</fpage><lpage>191</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15138734</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B35"><title><p>Genetic drift outweighs balancing selection in shaping post-bottleneck major histocompatibility complex variation in New Zealand robins (Petroicidae)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Miller</snm><fnm>HC</fnm></au><au><snm>Lambert</snm><fnm>DM</fnm></au></aug><source>MolEcol</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>13</volume><fpage>3709</fpage><lpage>3721</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B36"><title><p>The origin of landbirds of Tristan da Cunha, Nightingale and Inaccessible Islands</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rand</snm><fnm>AL</fnm></au></aug><source>Fieldiana Zoology</source><pubdate>1955</pubdate><volume>37</volume><fpage>139</fpage><lpage>166</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B37"><title><p>Ecological speciation in South Atlantic island finches</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ryan</snm><fnm>PG</fnm></au><au><snm>Rensburg</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Moloney</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Grant</snm><fnm>TJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Delport</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>Science</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>315</volume><fpage>1420</fpage><lpage>1423</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.1138829</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17347442</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B38"><aug><au><snm>van Rensburg</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Resolving the fine-scale population structure of Nesospizabuntings using a genetic multi-marker system</source><publisher>University of Pretoria: MSc thesis</publisher><pubdate>2011</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B39"><title><p>Taxonomic and conservation implications of ecological speciation in Nesospizabuntings on Tristan da Cunha</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ryan</snm><fnm>PG</fnm></au></aug><source>Bird ConservInt</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>18</volume><fpage>20</fpage><lpage>29</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B40"><title><p>Low MHC variation in the endangered Gal&#225;pagos penguin (<it>Spheniscusmendiculus</it>)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bollmer</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au><au><snm>Vargas</snm><fnm>FH</fnm></au><au><snm>Parker</snm><fnm>PG</fnm></au></aug><source>Immunogenetics</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>59</volume><fpage>593</fpage><lpage>602</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00251-007-0221-y</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17457582</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B41"><title><p>Hematology, serum chemistry, and serology of Gal&#225;pagos penguins in the Gal&#225;pagos Islands, Ecuador</p></title><aug><au><snm>Travis</snm><fnm>EK</fnm></au><au><snm>Vargas</snm><fnm>FH</fnm></au><au><snm>Merkel</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Gottdenker</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Miller</snm><fnm>RE</fnm></au><au><snm>Parker</snm><fnm>PG</fnm></au></aug><source>J Wildlife Dis</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>42</volume><fpage>625</fpage><lpage>632</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B42"><title><p>Nomenclature for the major histocompatibility complexes of different species: a proposal</p></title><aug><au><snm>Klein</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Bontrop</snm><fnm>RE</fnm></au><au><snm>Dawkins</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au><au><snm>Erlich</snm><fnm>HA</fnm></au><au><snm>Gyllensten</snm><fnm>UB</fnm></au><au><snm>Heise</snm><fnm>ER</fnm></au><au><snm>Jones</snm><fnm>PP</fnm></au><au><snm>Parham</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Wakeland</snm><fnm>EK</fnm></au><au><snm>Watkins</snm><fnm>DI</fnm></au></aug><source>Immunogenetics</source><pubdate>1990</pubdate><volume>31</volume><fpage>217</fpage><lpage>219</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">2329006</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B43"><title><p>Extensive MHC Class II B gene duplication in a passerine, the common yellowthroat (<it>Geothlypistrichas</it>)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bollmer</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au><au><snm>Dunn</snm><fnm>PO</fnm></au><au><snm>Whittingham</snm><fnm>LA</fnm></au><au><snm>Wimpee</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>J Hered</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>101</volume><fpage>448</fpage><lpage>460</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/jhered/esq018</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20200139</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B44"><title><p>Three-dimensional structure of the human class II histocompatibility antigen HLA-DR1</p></title><aug><au><snm>Brown</snm><fnm>JH</fnm></au><au><snm>Jardetzky</snm><fnm>TS</fnm></au><au><snm>Gorga</snm><fnm>JC</fnm></au><au><snm>Stern</snm><fnm>LJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Urban</snm><fnm>RG</fnm></au><au><snm>Storminger</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au><au><snm>Wiley</snm><fnm>DC</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>1993</pubdate><volume>364</volume><fpage>33</fpage><lpage>39</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/364033a0</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8316295</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B45"><title><p>Prediction of HLA-DQ3.2&#946; Ligands: evidence of multiple registers in class II binding peptides</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tong</snm><fnm>JC</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>GL</fnm></au><au><snm>Tan</snm><fnm>TW</fnm></au><au><snm>August</snm><fnm>JT</fnm></au><au><snm>Brusic</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Ranganathan</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Bioinformatics</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>22</volume><fpage>1232</fpage><lpage>1238</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btl071</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16510499</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B46"><title><p>Natural selection of the major histocompatibility complex (<it>MHC</it>) in Hawaiian honeycreepers (<it>Drepanidinae</it>)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jarvi</snm><fnm>SI</fnm></au><au><snm>Tarr</snm><fnm>CL</fnm></au><au><snm>McIntosh</snm><fnm>CE</fnm></au><au><snm>Atkinson</snm><fnm>CT</fnm></au><au><snm>Fleischer</snm><fnm>RC</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Ecol</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>13</volume><fpage>2157</fpage><lpage>2168</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02228.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15245391</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B47"><title><p>Diversity of MHC class I and II B genes in house sparrows (<it>Passer domesticus</it>)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bonneaud</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Sorci</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Morin</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Westerdahl</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Zoorob</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Wittzell</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Immunogenetics</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>55</volume><fpage>855</fpage><lpage>865</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00251-004-0648-3</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14963619</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B48"><title><p>Patterns of variation in MHC class II &#946; loci of the little greenbul (<it>Andropadusvirens</it>) with comments on MHC evolution in birds</p></title><aug><au><snm>Aguilar</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Edwards</snm><fnm>SV</fnm></au><au><snm>Smith</snm><fnm>TB</fnm></au><au><snm>Wayne</snm><fnm>RK</fnm></au></aug><source>J Hered</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>97</volume><fpage>133</fpage><lpage>142</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/jhered/esj013</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16489149</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B49"><title><p>The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins</p></title><aug><au><snm>Swanson</snm><fnm>WJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Vacquier</snm><fnm>VD</fnm></au></aug><source>Nat Rev Genet</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>3</volume><fpage>137</fpage><lpage>144</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11836507</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B50"><title><p>The species of MyrsideaWaterston (Insecta: Phthiraptera: Menoponidae) from the Gal&#225;pagos Islands, with descriptions of new taxa</p></title><aug><au><snm>Palma</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au><au><snm>Price</snm><fnm>RD</fnm></au></aug><source>Tuhinga</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>135</fpage><lpage>146</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B51"><title><p>The lice of the Tristan da Cunha archipelago (Insecta: Phthiraptera)</p></title><aug><au><snm>H&#228;nel</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Palma</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au></aug><source>Beitr&#228;geEntomol</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>57</volume><fpage>105</fpage><lpage>133</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19387542</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B52"><title><p>From Host-parasite co speciation, host switching and missing the boat</p></title><aug><au><snm>Paterson</snm><fnm>AM</fnm></au><au><snm>Gray</snm><fnm>RD</fnm></au></aug><source>Host-parasiteevolution: General principles and avian models</source><publisher>Oxforda: Oxford University Press</publisher><editor>Clayton DH, Moore J</editor><pubdate>1997</pubdate><fpage>236</fpage><lpage>250</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B53"><title><p>Bias and artifacts in multitemplate polymerase chain reactions (PCR)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kanagawa</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>J Biosci Bioeng</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>96</volume><fpage>317</fpage><lpage>323</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16233530</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B54"><title><p>PCR fidelity of Pfu DNA polymerase and other thermostable DNA polymerases</p></title><aug><au><snm>Cline</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Braman</snm><fnm>JC</fnm></au><au><snm>Hogrefe</snm><fnm>HH</fnm></au></aug><source>Nucleic Acid Research</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>24</volume><fpage>3546</fpage><lpage>3551</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/nar/24.18.3546</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B55"><title><p>A 454 multiplex sequencing method for rapid and reliable genotyping of highly polymorphic genes in large-scale studies</p></title><aug><au><snm>Galan</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Guivier</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Caraux</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Charbonnel</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Cosson</snm><fnm>JF</fnm></au></aug><source>BMC Genomics</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>11</volume><fpage>296</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-11-296</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2876125</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20459828</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B56"><title><p>Interspecific hybridization increases MHC class II diversity in two sister species of newts</p></title><aug><au><snm>Nadachowska-Brzyska</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Zielinski</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Radwan</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Babik</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Ecol</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>887</fpage><lpage>906</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05347.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">22066802</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B57"><title><p>Sequence diversity of the MHC DRB gene in the Eurasian beaver (<it>Castor fiber</it>)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Babik</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Durka</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Radwan</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Ecol</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>14</volume><fpage>4249</fpage><lpage>4257</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02751.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16313590</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B58"><title><p>Methods for MHC genotyping in non-model vertebrates</p></title><aug><au><snm>Babik</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol. Ecol. Res</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>10</volume><fpage>237</fpage><lpage>251</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02788.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B59"><title><p>Gene duplication and fragmentation in the zebra finch major histocompatibility complex</p></title><aug><au><snm>Balakrishnan</snm><fnm>CN</fnm></au><au><snm>Ekblom</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>V&#246;lker</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Westerdahl</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Godinez</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Kotkiewicz</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Burt</snm><fnm>DW</fnm></au><au><snm>Graves</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Griffin</snm><fnm>DK</fnm></au><au><snm>Warren</snm><fnm>WC</fnm></au><au><snm>Edwards</snm><fnm>SV</fnm></au></aug><source>BMC Biol</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>8</volume><fpage>29</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1741-7007-8-29</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2907588</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20359332</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B60"><title><p>Does reduced MHC diversity decrease viability of vertebrate populations?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Radwan</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Biedrzycka</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Babik</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>BiolConserv</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>143</volume><fpage>537</fpage><lpage>544</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B61"><title><p>Major histocompatibility complex variation in insular populations of the Egyptian vulture: inferences about the roles of genetic drift and selection</p></title><aug><au><snm>Agudo</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Alcaide</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Rico</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Lemus</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au><au><snm>Blanco</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Hiraldo</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Don&#225;zar</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Ecol</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>20</volume><fpage>2329</fpage><lpage>2340</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05107.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21535276</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B62"><title><p>Simple approach to reduce PCR artefact formation leads to reliable genotyping of MHC and other highly polymorphic loci - implications for evolutionary analysis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lenz</snm><fnm>TB</fnm></au><au><snm>Becker</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Gene</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>427</volume><fpage>117</fpage><lpage>123</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.gene.2008.09.013</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18848974</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B63"><title><p>DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data</p></title><aug><au><snm>Librado</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Rozas</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Bioinformatics</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>25</volume><fpage>1451</fpage><lpage>1452</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19346325</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B64"><title><p>A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>Z</fnm></au><au><snm>Schwartz</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Wagner</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Miller</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal Comput Biol</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>7</volume><fpage>203</fpage><lpage>214</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1089/10665270050081478</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B65"><title><p>MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tamura</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Dudley</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Nei</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kumar</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Biol Evol</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>24</volume><fpage>1596</fpage><lpage>1599</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/molbev/msm092</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17488738</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B66"><title><p>Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions</p></title><aug><au><snm>Nei</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Gojobori</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Biol Evol</source><pubdate>1986</pubdate><volume>3</volume><fpage>418</fpage><lpage>426</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">3444411</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B67"><title><p>PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood</p></title><aug><au><snm>Yang</snm><fnm>ZH</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Biol Evol</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>24</volume><fpage>1586</fpage><lpage>1591</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/molbev/msm088</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17483113</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B68"><title><p>Bayes empirical Bayes inference of amino acid sites under positive selection</p></title><aug><au><snm>Yang</snm><fnm>ZH</fnm></au><au><snm>Wong</snm><fnm>WSW</fnm></au><au><snm>Nielsen</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Biol Evol</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>22</volume><fpage>1107</fpage><lpage>1118</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/molbev/msi097</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15689528</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B69"><title><p>Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites</p></title><aug><au><snm>Yang</snm><fnm>Z</fnm></au><au><snm>Nielsen</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Goldman</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Pedersen</snm><fnm>A-MK</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>155</volume><fpage>431</fpage><lpage>449</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">1461088</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10790415</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B70"><title><p>MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ronquist</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Huelsenbeck</snm><fnm>JP</fnm></au></aug><source>Bioinformatics</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>19</volume><fpage>1572</fpage><lpage>1574</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12912839</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B71"><title><p>A new look at the statistical model identification</p></title><aug><au><snm>Akaike</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>IEEE T Automat Contr</source><pubdate>1974</pubdate><volume>19</volume><fpage>716</fpage><lpage>723</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B72"><title><p>jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging</p></title><aug><au><snm>Posada</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>MolBiolEvol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>25</volume><fpage>1253</fpage><lpage>1256</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B73"><title><p>Selection of models of DNA evolution with jModelTest</p></title><aug><au><snm>Posada</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Meth Mol Biol</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>537</volume><fpage>93</fpage><lpage>112</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/978-1-59745-251-9_5</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B74"><title><p>RDP2: recombination detection and analysis from sequence alignments</p></title><aug><au><snm>Martin</snm><fnm>DP</fnm></au><au><snm>Williamson</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Posada</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Bioinformatics</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>260</fpage><lpage>262</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/bth490</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15377507</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B75"><title><p>Detection of recombination amongst aligned sequences</p></title><aug><au><snm>Martin</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Rybicki</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>Bioinformatics</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>562</fpage><lpage>563</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/16.6.562</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10980155</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B76"><title><p>Possible emergence of new geminiviruses by frequent recombination</p></title><aug><au><snm>Padidam</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Sawyer</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Fauquet</snm><fnm>CM</fnm></au></aug><source>Virology</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>265</volume><fpage>218</fpage><lpage>225</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/viro.1999.0056</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10600594</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B77"><title><p>A modified bootscan algorithm for automated identification of recombinant sequences and recombination breakpoints</p></title><aug><au><snm>Martin</snm><fnm>DP</fnm></au><au><snm>Posada</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Crandall</snm><fnm>KA</fnm></au><au><snm>Williamson</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>AIDS ResHumRetrov</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>98</fpage><lpage>102</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B78"><title><p>Analysing the mosaic structure of genes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Maynard Smith</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>J Mol Evol</source><pubdate>1992</pubdate><volume>34</volume><fpage>126</fpage><lpage>129</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">1556748</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B79"><title><p>Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: Computer simulations</p></title><aug><au><snm>Posada</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Crandall</snm><fnm>KA</fnm></au></aug><source>PNAS</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>98</volume><fpage>13757</fpage><lpage>13762</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.241370698</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">61114</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11717435</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B80"><title><p>An exact nonparametric method for inferring mosaic structure in sequence triplets</p></title><aug><au><snm>Boni</snm><fnm>MF</fnm></au><au><snm>Posada</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Feldman</snm><fnm>MW</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>176</volume><fpage>1035</fpage><lpage>1047</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">1894573</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17409078</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B81"><title><p>Analyzing tables of statistical tests</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rice</snm><fnm>WR</fnm></au></aug><source>Evolution</source><pubdate>1989</pubdate><volume>43</volume><fpage>223</fpage><lpage>225</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/2409177</pubid></xrefbib></bibl></refgrp>
	</bm>
</art>