<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
	<ui>1471-2148-12-119</ui>
	<ji>1471-2148</ji>
	<fm>
		<dochead>Research article</dochead>
		<bibl>
			<title>
				<p>Ancestral polymorphism and recent invasion of transposable elements in <it>Drosophila</it> species</p>
			</title>
			<aug>
				<au id="A1"><snm>Dias</snm><mnm>Silva</mnm><fnm>Elaine</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>esdias@ibilce.unesp.br</email></au>
				<au id="A2" ca="yes"><snm>Carareto</snm><mnm>Aparecida</mnm><fnm>Claudia Marcia</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>carareto@ibilce.unesp.br</email></au>
			</aug>
			<insg>
				<ins id="I1"><p>Department of Biology, S&#227;o Jos&#233; do Rio Preto, UNESP - S&#227;o Paulo State University, S&#227;o Paulo, Brazil</p></ins>
			</insg>
			<source>BMC Evolutionary Biology</source>
			<issn>1471-2148</issn>
			<pubdate>2012</pubdate>
			<volume>12</volume>
			<issue>1</issue>
			<fpage>119</fpage>
			<url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/12/119</url>
			<xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2148-12-119</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">22823479</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
		</bibl>
		<history><rec><date><day>9</day><month>12</month><year>2011</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>10</day><month>7</month><year>2012</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>23</day><month>7</month><year>2012</year></date></pub></history>
		<cpyrt><year>2012</year><collab>Dias and Carareto; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
		<kwdg>
			<kwd>Transposable elements</kwd>
			<kwd>Ancestral polymorphism</kwd>
			<kwd>Horizontal transfer</kwd>
			<kwd>Introgressive hybridization</kwd>
			<kwd>Recent invasion</kwd>
			<kwd>
				<it>Drosophila melanogaster</it> group</kwd>
		</kwdg>
		<abs>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Abstract</p>
				</st>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Background</p>
					</st><p>During the evolution of transposable elements, some processes, such as ancestral polymorphisms and horizontal transfer of sequences between species, can produce incongruences in phylogenies. We investigated the evolutionary history of the transposable elements <it>Bari</it> and <it>412</it> in the sequenced genomes of the <it>Drosophila melanogaster</it> group and in the sibling species <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans</it> using traditional phylogenetic and network approaches.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Results</p>
					</st><p>Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analyses revealed incongruences and unresolved relationships for both the <it>Bari</it> and <it>412</it> elements. The DNA transposon <it>Bari</it> within the <it>D. ananassae</it> genome is more closely related to the element of the <it>melanogaster</it> complex than to the sequence in <it>D. erecta</it>, which is inconsistent with the species phylogeny. Divergence analysis and the comparison of the rate of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site of the <it>Bari</it> and host gene sequences explain the incongruence as an ancestral polymorphism that was inherited stochastically by the derived species. Unresolved relationships were observed in the ML phylogeny of both elements involving <it>D. melanogaster</it>, <it>D. simulans</it> and <it>D. sechellia</it>. A network approach was used to attempt to resolve these relationships. The resulting tree suggests recent transfers of both elements between <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans</it>. The divergence values of the elements between these species support this conclusion.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Conclusions</p>
					</st><p>We showed that ancestral polymorphism and recent invasion of genomes due to introgression or horizontal transfer between species occurred during the evolutionary history of the <it>Bari</it> and <it>412</it> elements in the <it>melanogaster</it> group. These invasions likely occurred in Africa during the Pleistocene, before the worldwide expansion of <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans</it>.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
		</abs>
	</fm>
	<bdy>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Background</p>
			</st><p>Transposable elements are segments of repetitive DNA that can mobilize and propagate within host genomes. They have long been considered to be selfish DNA sequences because of the deleterious effects of their mobilization on the host genome. Recent advances in genome analysis methods have revealed the significant contribution of transposable elements to genome evolution as sources of genomic novelty, as they can promote rearrangements <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> and duplications <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> and can produce new regulatory sequences <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> that drive the changes necessary for genome evolution <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The emergence of transposable elements in a genome can occur in three ways: <it>de novo</it> emergence, by the recombination of existing elements within genomes; horizontal transfer, by a vector; and introgression, by hybridization between two species (one with and one without a given element) <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The origin of a transposable element in a new genome by the last two processes may produce incongruences when the phylogeny of the elements is compared to those of the species that harbor them. In addition, incongruence can also be produced when two or more variants in an ancestral lineage are stochastically inherited by the derived lineages. Horizontal transfer has been reported in several organisms (for a review see <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>), primarily between closely related species, given the requirement of shared time and space. In many cases, such species also share putative vectors (for a review see <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>); however, the occurrence of phylogenetic incongruence due to the stochastic inheritance of ancestral polymorphisms, although potentially common and frequently given as an alternative hypothesis to horizontal transfers <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, is less often demonstrated in the literature.</p><p>The genus <it>Drosophila</it> has been the focus of numerous studies involving transposable elements, and the aforementioned processes have been described in these species via bioinformatics analyses and analysis of natural populations <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>; such studies have focused on species of the <it>melanogaster</it> group, especially the <it>melanogaster</it> subgroup. This subgroup comprises nine species (<it>D. yakuba</it>, <it>D. teissieri</it>, <it>D. santomea</it>, <it>D. erecta</it>, <it>D. orena</it>, <it>D. melanogaster</it>, <it>D. simulans</it>, <it>D. sechellia</it> and <it>D. mauritiana</it>) that differ in many aspects, such as geographical distribution and food and host preference, but that diverged relatively recently. The subgroup is one of ten subgroups of <it>melanogaster</it>, eight of which are found in Asia and three in Africa (<it>melanogaster</it>, <it>montium</it> and <it>ananassae</it>); however, only the <it>melanogaster</it> subgroup is endemic to the Afrotropical region <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. This subgroup is thought to have originated from a proto-<it>melanogaster</it> founder population that arrived in Africa 17&#8211;20 Mya from the Oriental region. This founder population gave rise to the evolutionary lineages that produced the <it>erecta</it> supercomplex approximately 13&#8211;15 Mya, the <it>yakuba</it> complex approximately 8&#8211;15 Mya and, more recently, the basal lineage of the <it>melanogaster</it> supercomplex. Within this supercomplex, the most basal species, <it>D. melanogaster</it>, arose between 2 and 3 Mya; <it>D. simulans, D. sechellia</it> and <it>D. mauritiana</it> emerged very recently, no more than 0.5 Mya <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans</it> are widespread due to very recent global colonization. Also widespread is <it>D. ananassae</it>; this species belongs to the <it>ananassae</it> subgroup, the basal clade in the <it>melanogaster</it> species group <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> (Species Phylogeny, Additional file <supplr sid="S1">1</supplr> Figure S1). This species originated in southeast Asia and subsequently dispersed to other parts of the world, possibly through human activity <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The availability of the complete genomes of five species in the subgroup <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> enables the description of numerous transposable element transfers <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Meanwhile, the sequencing of just one strain&#8217;s genome (in four of the five species) and the variable rates of genome coverage can prevent an accurate understanding of the evolutionary history of the elements in these species. One potentially important species is <it>D. ananassae</it>, whose genome is available but rarely included in studies. Its widespread distribution, from tropical to subtropical regions, and highly substructured populations make <it>D. ananassae </it> a model for studies of genetic variation <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, such as the characterization of transposable elements.</p>
			<suppl id="S1">
				<title>
					<p>Additional File 1</p>
				</title>
				<text>
					<p>
						<b>Figure S1: the phylogenetic relationships between species of the </b><b>
							<it>melanogaster </it>
						</b><b>group of </b><b>
							<it>Drosophila</it>
						</b><b>.</b>
					</p>
				</text>
				<file name="1471-2148-12-119-S1.doc">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
			</suppl><p>Among the transposable elements studied in the <it>melanogaster</it> subgroup regarding horizontal transmission or introgression are the DNA transposon <it>Bari</it> (transfer between <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans </it>
				<abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>), and the retrotransposon <it>412</it> (transfers between <it>D. melanogaster</it>, <it>D. simulans</it> and <it>D. sechellia </it>
				<abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>). <it>Bari</it>, a DNA transposon belonging to the <it>Tc1-Mariner</it> superfamily, is an ancient element in the evolutionary lineage of drosophilids that is widespread in both the <it>Drosophila</it> and <it>Sophophora</it> subgenera of the <it>Drosophila</it> genus, although it seems to have been lost in some species <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Within the genus, there are interspecific structural variations in the terminal-inverted repeats (TIRs), the size of which would have changed over time <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Some variants, such as <it>Bari2</it> (distributed in both <it>Drosophila</it> and <it>Sophophora</it> species) and <it>Bari3</it> (described in <it>D. willistoni</it>, <it>D. pseudoobscura</it> and <it>D. mojavensis</it>) harbor long TIRs, called LIRs (Long Inverted Repeats), which are approximately 250 bp long. Others, such as <it>Bari1</it>, which is present in the <it>melanogaster</it> complex only, contain short TIRs, called SIRs (Short Inverted Repeats), which are approximately 26-bp long. These three variants, which share over 50% amino-acid similarity, characterize three subfamilies derived from a common <it>Bari</it>-element ancestor <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The element <it>412</it>, a LTR (Long Terminal Repeats) retrotransposon that belongs to a <it>Gypsy</it>-like superfamily, also seems to have appeared early in the evolution of the Drosophilidae family and to have been subsequently lost in some lineages <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. In contrast to <it>D. melanogaster</it>, the genome of which contains only one <it>412-</it>subfamily element, <it>D. simulans</it> has two intragenomic variants that differ in the size of the 5&#180;LTR &#8211; UTR regulatory region. These two subfamilies arose from rearrangements and insertion-deletion events that produced new elements that may be capable of escaping host control <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>Here, we studied the occurrence of both <it>Bari</it> and <it>412</it> in the six sequenced genomes of the <it>melanogaster</it> group (<it>D. ananassae, D. erecta</it>, <it>D. yakuba</it>, <it>D. melanogaster</it>, <it>D. simulans</it> and <it>D. sechellia</it>). In addition, we compared the <it>in silico</it> results with those obtained from geographic strains of the sibling species <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans</it> to uncover the evolutionary history of these transposable elements in the subgroup. The results will expand our understanding of the processes that shaped their evolution. We showed that at least two <it>Bari</it> variants were present in the ancestral lineage of the <it>melanogaster</it> group and were stochastically inherited, leading to incongruences between the phylogeny of the species and that of the transposable element. We also showed that the transfer of <it>Bari</it> and <it>412</it> elements between <it>D. simulans</it> and <it>D. melanogaster</it> occurred before the worldwide dispersal of both species and involved only one sequence per element. Thus, ancestral polymorphism, losses and reintroductions can explain the evolutionary distribution of these elements in these species of the <it>melanogaster</it> species subgroup.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Results</p>
			</st><p>Using the deposited sequences and the reference sequences for the transposable elements <it>Bari</it> and <it>412</it>, we searched in the sequenced genomes of the <it>melanogaster</it> group. Homologous full-length and fragmentary sequences of both elements were found in all species (see Table S1 in Additional File <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr> and Table S5 in Additional File <supplr sid="S3">3</supplr>). The fragments were not included in the analyses because most of them contained large deletions and many nucleotide substitutions, which prevent the estimation of the <it>Ks</it> values and the corresponding time of divergence between the sequences. Therefore, only the full-length sequences, with both TIRs for <it>Bari</it> and both LTRs for <it>412</it>, were used for the analyses.</p>
			<suppl id="S2">
				<title>
					<p>Additional File 2</p>
				</title>
				<text>
					<p>
						<b>Tables and figure about the characteristics and evolutionary analyses of the DNA transposon </b><b>
							<it>Bari </it>
						</b><b>sequences found in the sequenced genomes of species of the </b><b>
							<it>melanogaster </it>
						</b><b>group of </b><b>
							<it>Drosophila.</it>
						</b> Table corresponding to the <it>Ks</it> analyses of the genes <it>ADH</it> and <it>GAPDH</it>.</p>
				</text>
				<file name="1471-2148-12-119-S2.doc">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
			</suppl>
			<suppl id="S3">
				<title>
					<p>Additional File 3</p>
				</title>
				<text>
					<p>
						<b>Tables and figures about the characteristics and evolutionary analyses of the sequences of the retrotransposon </b><b>
							<it>412 </it>
						</b><b>found in the sequenced genomes of species of the </b><b>
							<it>melanogaster </it>
						</b><b>group of </b><b>
							<it>Drosophila</it>
						</b><b>.</b>
					</p>
				</text>
				<file name="1471-2148-12-119-S3.doc">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
			</suppl>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>DNA transposon Bari</p>
				</st><p>The number of full-length <it>Bari</it> sequences varied by species: 11 were found in <it>D. melanogaster</it>, two were found in both <it>D. simulans</it> and <it>D. sechellia</it>, seven in <it>D. erecta</it> and four in <it>D. ananassae</it> (see Table S2 in Additional File <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr>). The only sequence found in <it>D. yakuba</it> was a 215 bp fragment resembling the <it>Bari</it> of <it>D. erecta</it>. The ML reconstruction of evolutionary relationships among the full-length sequences is shown in Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>A and Additional file <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr> Figure S2. The sequences of <it>D. ananassae</it> and <it>D. erecta</it> are clustered in well-supported monophyletic clades. Also well-supported is the clade grouping the sequences of the <it>melanogaster</it> complex (<it>D. melanogaster</it>, <it>D. simulans</it> and <it>D. sechellia</it>), albeit in a polytomic branch; however, the <it>Bari</it> sequences of <it>D. ananassae</it> cluster more closely to those of the <it>melanogaster</it> complex than to those of <it>D. erecta</it>, which is inconsistent with the species phylogeny (Additional File <supplr sid="S1">1</supplr>). The <it>K2p</it> distances further contribute to this incongruence, with the sequences of the <it>melanogaster</it> complex and <it>D. ananassae</it> being less divergent from each other (<it>melanogaster</it> complex vs. <it>D. ananassae</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.171&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.012; <it>melanogaster</it> complex vs. <it>D. erecta</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.372&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.024; <it>D. ananassae</it> vs. <it>D. erecta</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.380&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.023; see Table S3 in Additional File <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr>).</p>
				<fig id="F1"><title><p>Figure 1</p></title><caption><p>Phylogenetic reconstructions conducted using sequences of the DNA transposon <it>Bari</it> in the <it>melanogaster</it> group of <it>Drosophila</it></p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Phylogenetic reconstructions conducted using sequences of the DNA transposon </b><b><it>Bari </it></b><b>in the </b><b><it>melanogaster </it></b><b>group of </b><b><it>Drosophila</it></b><b>.</b> (<b>A</b>) Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood and (<b>B</b>) Network using the sequences of the transposase of the full-length copies obtained from sequenced genomes of the <it>melanogaster</it> group; (<b>C</b>) Network reconstructed using a region of the transposase sequenced in natural populations of the <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans</it> species. In the network, full circles correspond to the sampled sequences; empty circles correspond to median vectors ancestral nodes, which represent lost sequences or sequences not sampled. Circle size corresponds to sequence frequency; branch size is proportional to the number of mutations that occurred, as indicated by the numbers above the branches.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2148-12-119-1"/></fig><p>Two processes could be responsible for the phylogenetic incongruence observed in the <it>Bari</it> phylogeny: recent invasion of the <it>melanogaster</it> complex by a <it>Bari</it> sequence from <it>D. ananassae</it> (or vice versa) or the existence of an ancestral polymorphism followed by stochastic inheritance. To distinguish between these two possibilities, we estimated <it>Ks</it>, the rate of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site, which provide a measure of divergence in neutral sites, and the time of divergence of the <it>Bari</it> sequences and of the host genes (i.e., ADH and GAPDH). If the incongruence in the phylogeny is due to differential fixation of <it>Bari</it> variants in the common ancestor and is evolving vertically, then the <it>Ks</it> values of <it>Bari</it> and of the host genes and their time of divergence should be equivalent; however, if the estimates for the transposable element sequences are significantly lower than those for the host genes, then <it>Bari</it> was likely transferred after the species divergence, through horizontal transfer or species hybridization. The sequences of <it>D. sechellia</it> and <it>D. erecta</it> were not utilized in this analysis because they contained large numbers of stop codons and small deletions. The <it>Bari</it> sequences of <it>D. ananassae</it> showed few premature stop codons, all of which were excluded from the alignment, so these sequences were used in the <it>Ks</it> estimate. The average <it>Ks</it> values of the <it>Bari</it> sequences and host genes were as follows: <it>D. melanogaster</it> vs. <it>D. ananassae</it>, <it>Bari Ks</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.409&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.049 and host genes <it>Ks</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.428&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.058; <it>D. simulans</it> vs. <it>D. ananassae</it>, <it>Bari Ks</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.409&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.047 and host genes <it>Ks</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.422&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.055 (see Tables S4 and S5 in Additional File <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr>). Using the estimated <it>Ks</it> and 0.011 substitutions per site per million years (My) <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> as the rate of synonymous substitution, the average time of divergence of <it>Bari</it> in these species was estimated at 17.68 My, and that of the host genes was 19.34 My. During this latter period, the lineages that gave rise to <it>D. ananassae</it> and the <it>melanogaster</it> subgroup were still evolving in Asia <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, suggesting that the <it>Bari</it> sequences diverged from a common sequence in the common ancestor. These estimates suggest that the incongruence resulted from stochastic retention of the same <it>Bari1</it>-like variant by the ancestors of <it>D. ananassae</it> and of the <it>melanogaster</it> complex. The loss of parts of the TIRs followed, yielding long TIRs in <it>D. ananassae</it> and short TIRs in the <it>melanogaster</it> complex <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>.</p><p>The ML tree did not allow us to resolve the relationships among the <it>Bari1</it> sequences within the <it>melanogaster</it> complex (<it>D. melanogaster</it>, <it>D. simulans</it>, <it>D. sechellia</it>) because the sequences are very similar and cluster within an unresolved branch. We therefore reconstructed the sequence relationships using a network tree. This approach can resolve relationships among sequences with low diversity and can thus be used to infer the origin of multiple copies from a unique sequence. In addition, the network reveals relationships between ancestral and derived sequences and introduces median vectors, which represent ancestral, lost or unsampled sequences <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>; these relationships cannot be inferred from the classical phylogenies.</p><p>The network shows a second phylogenetic incongruence in the <it>Bari1</it> sequences, revealing a closer relationship between the copies of <it>D. simulans</it> and <it>D. melanogaster</it> than either has to <it>D. sechellia</it> (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>B). The two full-length sequences of <it>D. simulans</it> are directly related to a unique sequence of <it>D. melanogaster</it>, which is centrally positioned on the network and is the sequence from which all the other sequences of this species diverged. Moreover, all sequences of <it>D. melanogaster</it> are very similar (<it>K2p</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.0020&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.0006), suggesting a recent origin. The age of these copies was estimated at ~ 40,000 y (<it>Ks</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.00086&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.00084), and the longest time of divergence between the <it>Bari1</it> sequences of <it>D. melanogaster</it> and that of <it>D. simulans</it> was estimated at ~ 196,900 y (<it>Ks</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.0004&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.0004; average time&#8201;=&#8201;32,800 y; shortest time&#8201;=&#8201;0; see Table S4 in Additional File <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr>). Because the <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans</it> lineages split from a common ancestor between 2 and 3 Mya <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, the network topology and the divergence time of the <it>Bari1</it> sequences in both species are inconsistent with the species phylogeny and the estimated divergence time. These data suggest a very recent transfer of <it>Bari1</it> from <it>D. simulans</it> to <it>D. melanogaster</it> and further suggest that following this transfer, the sequence remained active and dispersed within the <it>D. melanogaster</it> genome, producing the similar copies that are observed today. The short branches and the presence of several similar copies in the <it>D. melanogaster</it> network, all derived from the same sequence, are evidence of transposition burst, a common process after the introduction of a new element into a na&#239;ve genome <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, supporting the hypothesis of the transfer from <it>D. simulans</it> to <it>D. melanogaster</it>.</p><p>The similarity of the two <it>D. simulans Bari1</it> sequences to that of <it>D. melanogaster</it> is high, with the sequences differing at only a few sites. To identify whether the proposed recent transfer is exclusive to the sequenced genomes, we sequenced a region of the transposase gene in different strains of both species and reconstructed their relationships (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>C). The strains analyzed represented natural populations of different geographic origins: Africa, the ancestral site; Asia and Europe, continents that were first colonized by both species (ancient invaders); and Brazil, where colonization occurred relatively recently (recent invaders). The evolutionary reconstruction shows a sequence shared among all strains. This central sequence, which likely corresponds to the central sequence depicted in Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>B, could be the sequence transferred between the species. The sharing of this sequence among strains of different geographic origins (Africa, Asia, Europe and Brazil) suggests that transfer of <it>Bari</it> occurred before the global dispersal of <it>D. melanogaster</it>.</p>
				<fig id="F2"><title><p>Figure 2</p></title><caption><p>Phylogenetic reconstructions conducted using the retrotransposon <it>412</it> sequences in the <it>melanogaster</it> group of <it>Drosophila</it></p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Phylogenetic reconstructions conducted using the retrotransposon </b><b><it>412 </it></b><b>sequences in the </b><b><it>melanogaster </it></b><b>group of </b><b><it>Drosophila </it></b><b>.</b> (<b>A</b>) Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood and (<b>B</b>) Network using the <it>gag</it> sequences of full copies obtained from sequenced genomes of the <it>melanogaster</it> group; (<b>C</b>) Network reconstructed using a region of the integrase, sequenced from samples of natural populations of <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans</it>. In the network, full circles correspond to the sampled sequences; empty circles correspond to the ancestral nodes, which represent lost sequences or sequences not sampled. Circle size corresponds to sequence frequency; branch size is proportional to the number of mutations that occurred, as indicated by the numbers above branches.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2148-12-119-2"/></fig>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Retrotransposon 412</p>
				</st><p>As with <it>Bari</it>, we found different numbers of full-length copies (with both LTRs) of the retrotransposon <it>412</it> in different species of the <it>melanogaster</it> group. The smallest numbers were found in <it>D. simulans</it> (2) and <it>D. yakuba</it> (2), followed by <it>D. erecta</it> (8), <it>D. sechellia</it> (11), <it>D. ananassae</it> (14) and <it>D. melanogaster</it> (27<it>;</it> see Table S5 in Additional File <supplr sid="S3">3</supplr>). The ML phylogeny based on the <it>gag</it> region shows monophyletic branches clustering with the sequences of <it>D. ananassae</it>, <it>D. erecta</it> and <it>D. yakuba</it> with high statistical support (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>A and Additional file <supplr sid="S3">3</supplr>: Figure S3). Like the species, the <it>D. ananassae 412</it> was the first to diverge. Next, the ancestral element of <it>D. yakuba</it> and <it>D. erecta</it> diverged, also mirroring the species divergence (Additional File <supplr sid="S1">1</supplr>); however, in the <it>melanogaster</it> complex, the <it>412</it> sequences did not form monophyletic groups within each species. Given the very recent divergence of <it>D. melanogaster, D. simulans</it> and <it>D. sechellia</it> (~2 and 3 Mya and 0.5 Mya, respectively <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B28">28</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, the sequences of <it>412</it> could not have had time to coalesce, potentially explaining the unresolved relationships among them. Alternatively, the <it>412</it> sequence could have been exchanged between these species.</p><p>To resolve the phylogenetic relationships of <it>412</it> within the <it>melanogaster</it> complex, we again used the network approach (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>B). The reconstruction shows long and short branches connecting the sequences of <it>D. sechellia</it>, suggesting the presence of old and young copies in this species. These sequences are connected to two copies of <it>D. simulans</it> through median vectors (ancestral or unsampled sequences). In <it>D. simulans</it>, only two full-length sequences were sampled; these sequences are located in different regions of the network. One is related by a long branch to the old sequences of <it>D. sechellia</it> through median vectors, whereas the other is more closely related to all the sequences of <it>D. melanogaster</it>. As shown in Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>B, all copies of <it>D. melanogaster</it> are directly derived from this sequence of <it>D. simulans</it>, and all have short branches, indicating a very recent origin. This relationship suggests a transfer of <it>412</it> from <it>D. simulans</it> to <it>D. melanogaster</it>.</p><p>To confirm this pattern in strains derived from several natural populations, we sequenced the integrase region of the <it>412</it> element in the same strains of <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans</it> analyzed for <it>Bari</it> (from Africa, Asia, Europe and South America) and reconstructed the network (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>C). A similar relationship was observed in the strains of both species, where most of the <it>D. melanogaster</it> sequences show short branches and are derived from only one <it>D. simulans</it> sequence. Two sequences of <it>D. melanogaster</it> are excluded from this group. They are unresolved and connected by a median vector to the <it>D. simulans</it> sequences, as is apparent from the reticulation in the network. There are two main groups of <it>D. simulans</it> sequences: one with resolved relationships and short branches, and the other presenting reticulations and several long branches. This scenario reflects the ancient and complex evolutionary history of <it>412</it> in this species. Note that the sequence transferred to <it>D. melanogaster</it> is shared by all <it>D. simulans</it> strains, indicating that it is an active ancestral sequence in this species. In addition, all <it>D. melanogaster</it> strains, regardless of origin, share the sequence derived from <it>D. simulans</it>, which differs by only one point mutation. The sharing of ancestral sequences among strains from different continents suggests that, as with <it>Bari</it>, transfer occurred before the dispersal out of Africa.</p><p>The age of the proposed transfer was estimated using the molecular clock equation (t&#8201;=&#8201;<it>Ks</it>/2r). To calculate <it>Ks</it>, the 27 full-length sequences of <it>gag</it>&#8201;+&#8201;<it>pol</it> ORFs extracted from the sequenced <it>D. melanogaster</it> genome were compared to the ancestral sequence from <it>D. simulans</it> (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>B, detail). The oldest age estimated is 146,000 y (average&#8201;=&#8201;33,674 y&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.0084; lowest&#8201;=&#8201;0.0 y), suggesting that the transfer of <it>412</it> from <it>D. simulans</it> to <it>D. melanogaster</it> occurred very recently (see Table S7 in Additional File <supplr sid="S3">3</supplr>). Indeed, the ages of the insertions in the <it>D. melanogaster</it> genome, as calculated by the divergence between the LTRs of each copy are 94,697 y (the highest) and 0.0 y (the lowest<it>;</it> see Figure S4 in Additional File <supplr sid="S3">3</supplr>). It is known that at least two factors can introduce biases into this estimation. First, the LTRs evolve, in general, faster than the coding domains of the retrotransposon sequence. Second, because the LTRs of the new copy are synthesized from only one maternal LTR at the moment of reverse transcription, the new LTRs are identical at the point of insertion. This process may conceal the accumulation of divergence between copies. Despite these biases, this approach has been widely used <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B29">29</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B30">30</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> and provides useful information about the date of insertion of each copy. The estimated age indicates that transposition would have started soon after the introduction of the copy and continued until very recently, congruent with empirical data and simulations <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. The analysis shows that all full-length <it>412 D. melanogaster</it> sequences were inserted into the genome no more than 0.1 Mya, while in <it>D. simulans</it>, the insertion occurred approximately 0.3 Mya.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Discussion</p>
			</st><p>The DNA transposon <it>Bari</it> and the retrotransposon <it>412</it> are found widely in <it>Drosophila</it>, suggesting a long evolutionary history within the genus <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B31">31</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Here, we performed phylogenetic analyses involving both traditional and network approaches that allowed us to reveal the occurrence of ancestral polymorphism and recent transfer of transposable elements between <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans</it>.</p>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Ancestral polymorphism</p>
				</st><p>We performed an <it>in silico</it> search for the DNA transposon <it>Bari</it> in the sequenced genome of species of the <it>melanogaster</it> group, and we sequenced a region of the transposase in different geographic strains of <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans</it>. The element exhibits structural variations related to its TIRs, which characterize various <it>Bari</it> subfamilies <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. Both long and short TIRs were observed in the sequences analyzed in our study. The sequences of elements found in <it>D. ananassae</it> and <it>D. erecta</it>, which contain long TIRs, included stop codons and are therefore inactive, whereas the sequences of <it>D. melanogaster</it>, <it>D. simulans</it> and <it>D. sechellia</it> included short TIRs. In <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans</it>, there were full-length sequences without stop codons, which therefore suggest putatively active copies. In contrast, the full-length sequences in <it>D. sechellia</it> included multiple stop codons.</p><p>The element found in <it>D. ananassae</it>, with long TIRs, is more closely related to the element of <it>D. melanogaster</it>, which has short TIRs, than to that of <it>D. erecta</it>, which also has long TIRs. These relationships produce incongruences between the element and species phylogenies. The element found in <it>D. erecta</it> (<it>Bari2</it> subfamily) is widely distributed in <it>Drosophila</it>, whereas those in <it>D. ananassae</it> (<it>Bari1</it>-like subfamily) and in the <it>melanogaster</it> complex (<it>Bari1</it> subfamily) are restricted to their respective species; this pattern indicates that the <it>Bari</it> element of <it>D. erecta</it> is older than that of <it>D. ananassae </it>
					<abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. Therefore, we propose that the ancestor of the <it>melanogaster</it> species group possessed at least two <it>Bari</it> variants that were stochastically inherited by the derived species. The estimated age of the common ancestor of the <it>Bari</it> sequences in the genomes of <it>D. ananassae</it> and <it>D. melanogaster</it> (~ 17 Mya) is similar to the ages of their host genes (~ 19 Mya). During this period, the proto-<it>melanogaster</it> lineage was still diversifying from its sister subgroups in Africa. The only published estimate for the diversification between the <it>melanogaster</it> and <it>ananassae</it> subgroups is&#8201;~&#8201;44 Mya <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, but it could have occurred more recently, as all of the divergence times estimated in that study are more than two times higher than other estimates (e.g., between the <it>melanogaster</it> and <it>montium</it> subgroups, 41.3 Mya <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> and 12.7 Mya <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> and between <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans,</it> 5.4 Mya <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, 2.3 Mya <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> and 2&#8211;3 Mya <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>). In conclusion, i) the phylogenetic incongruence arising from clustering the <it>Bari</it> sequences of <it>D. ananassae</it> with those of the <it>melanogaster</it> complex and ii) the older estimated age of their <it>Bari</it> ancestor with respect to the age of diversification of the <it>melanogaster</it> subgroup and the migration of its ancestral lineage to Tropical Africa support the hypothesis of vertical inheritance with stochastic retention of polymorphic sequences of <it>Bari</it> in these species. The ancestral polymorphism hypothesis is also supported by the smaller distances between the elements of the <it>D. ananassae</it> vs. <it>melanogaster</it> complex than between those of the <it>D. erecta</it> vs. <it>melanogaster</it> complex.</p><p>As described in the Background section, few reports clearly demonstrate retention of ancestral polymorphisms. One such study examines the DNA transposon <it>mariner</it>, which occurs in the <it>melanogaster</it> subgroup in <it>D. simulans, D. sechellia, D. mauritiana, D. yakuba</it> and <it>D. teissieri</it>, but not in <it>D. melanogaster, D. erecta</it> and <it>D. orena.</it> It is proposed that <it>mariner</it> was present in the ancestral species prior to the radiation of the <it>melanogaster</it> species subgroup and that the element was lost independently in the lineages leading to <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. orena - D. erecta.</it> In addition, the <it>mariner</it> sequences of <it>D. simulans</it> and <it>D. mauritiana</it> share active copies, a subset of all <it>mariner</it> sequences, that cluster together rather than according to the species phylogeny. This shared polymorphism in populations of <it>D. simulans</it> worldwide and in <it>D. mauritiana</it> indicates retention of ancestral polymorphisms <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. In both the <it>mariner</it> study and in ours, the rates of evolution of the DNA transposon and of a host gene were compared to test the ancestral-polymorphism hypothesis and to explain incongruence between the phylogenies of the species and the transposable element.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Transposable element recent invasion</p>
				</st><p>The incongruence between the species phylogeny and the phylogenies of the <it>Bari</it> and <it>412</it> elements, along with the ages of the sequences shared between <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans</it> (less than the age of the species divergence), could arise through either horizontal transfer or introgressive hybridization. An increasing number of reports in the last two decades (mostly published following the rise of large-scale genome sequencing, which allows analysis of most copies from a given genome as well as broader comparative evolutionary analysis) suggest that horizontal transfer of transposable elements occurs frequently in eukaryotes (for a review see <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>), especially in <it>Drosophila</it> (for a review see <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>). Particularly for <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans</it>, evidence of horizontal transfer is accumulating in the literature <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B39">39</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B40">40</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B41">41</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B42">42</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, including the elements <it>Bari </it>
					<abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> and <it>412</it>
					<abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B42">42</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, the focus of this study; however, <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans</it> can hybridize, even today, in both the laboratory <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B43">43</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> and in nature <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B44">44</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>; therefore, it is also possible to introduce transposable elements via hybridization.</p><p>In order for either horizontal transfer or introgression to occur, species must overlap in time, space and habitat. Moreover, for horizontal transfer, a shared potential vector (e.g., a virus or endobacterium) is required. Currently, the sibling species <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans</it> are cosmopolitan and are sympatric in many parts of the world; however, our analyses suggest that transfer events occurred before their worldwide expansion but after species divergence. It is thought that <it>D. melanogaster</it> was the first species to diverge from a common ancestor in West Africa and that the ancestor of <it>D. simulans</it>, the proto-<it>simulans</it> lineage, migrated to east Africa and occupied the Pacific islands and then diversified. After the divergence, <it>D. simulans</it> returned to the mainland and expanded, coming into contact with <it>D. melanogaster</it> populations in Africa during the Late Pleistocene (around 120 and 9 thousand years ago) <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>; we estimate that transfer of both elements occurred during this period. Overlaps in space, time, and most likely niche, may have provided the necessary conditions for both horizontal transfer and introgression. Regardless of the precise mechanism, after the transfers occurred, both species expanded out of Africa, <it>D. melanogaster</it> with the <it>Homo sapiens</it> migration and <it>D. simulans</it> more recently, most likely during the great navigations <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>.</p><p>The presence of defective fragments of <it>Bari</it> and <it>412</it> elements in the sequenced genomes of both species and the presence of two more divergent sequences of the retrotransposon <it>412</it> in populations of <it>D. melanogaster</it> (as shown in the network) indicate that both elements were present in the common ancestor of these species and were inherited by both species. The presence of full-length and putatively active copies in <it>D. melanogaster</it>, which were derived exclusively from sequences transferred from <it>D. simulans</it>, suggests that <it>D. melanogaster</it> either did not inherit active copies of both <it>Bari</it> and <it>412</it> from a common ancestor or lost these copies early in its diversification. The defective fragments that are still present today would then be remnants of the copies inherited from its ancestor. After the reintroductions of <it>Bari</it> and <it>412</it>, the transferred sequences remained active in <it>D. melanogaster</it>, giving rise to the majority of copies that are currently present in this species. We show here that the amplification of these copies occurred in a short period of time and at elevated rates, resulting in a burst of transposition. This process can be deduced from the network by the presence of identical sequences clustered in nodes or by similar sequences connected by short branches; these characteristics are observed in both species, in both the sequenced genomes and in natural populations. Bursts of transposition have been previously reported, <it>in silico</it>, for other elements in the genomes of the <it>melanogaster</it> subgroup, such as the <it>Helitron DINE-1</it> in <it>D. yakuba</it> and <it>D. ananassae</it>
					<abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B45">45</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> and numerous LTR retrotransposons in the <it>D. melanogaster</it> euchromatin <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>.</p><p>The element <it>412</it> occurs in two subfamilies in <it>D. simulans</it>. Only one is observed in <it>D. melanogaster</it> and is very similar to one of the subfamilies found in <it>D. simulans</it>
					<abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B30">30</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. Therefore, according to our data, an ancestral sequence of the <it>melanogaster</it> complex was likely inherited by both species, but diversification occurred only in <it>D. simulans</it>; later, one of the two subfamilies was transferred to <it>D. melanogaster</it>, which at the time had only defective copies derived from its ancestral lineage. The subfamilies present in <it>D. simulans</it> were the result of rearrangements, indels and point mutations in the regulatory sequences in the 5' LTR &#8211;UTR region; then, these changes gave rise to elements that were able to overcome the host control for transposition and thus able to became invaders <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B30">30</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. This process may explain why the retrotransposon <it>412</it> remained active in <it>D. simulans</it> following its divergence and retained its capacity for amplification following its transfer to <it>D. melanogaster</it>, whose control host system, which had coevolved related with the sequences inherited from the ancestral copies, could not recognize this new element. Data from the literature (reviewed in <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>) suggest that several elements have been independently transferred between the two species over time (e.g., <it>Copia</it>, <it>tirant</it>, <it>Opus</it>, <it>Gypsy 2</it>, <it>Gypsy 5</it>, <it>Gypsy 6</it>, <it>297, 17.6</it>), but several others may have been transferred simultaneously and very recently (e.g., <it>412</it>, <it>Blood</it>, <it>Stalker 2</it>, <it>Transpac</it>, <it>Flea</it>), as can be deduced from the very similar ages of the transfers. There is a consensus that multiple elements have recently arrived in <it>D. melanogaster</it>; however, their origins either have not been suggested <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> or were not clearly demonstrated <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B46">46</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. Utilization of the network approach allowed us to propose, at least for <it>Bari</it> and <it>412</it>, that <it>D. simulans</it> was the donor species.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Conclusions</p>
			</st><p>The results obtained here allowed us to propose that the incongruences observed in the phylogeny of the <it>Bari</it> and <it>412</it> elements were a result of ancestral polymorphism as well as recent invasion of <it>D. melanogaster</it> genome by these elements. The ancestral polymorphism associated with <it>Bari</it> is supported by phylogenetic incongruence, and by a divergence time of Bari between the <it>D. melanogaster</it> complex and <it>D. ananassae</it> similar to that of the host genes. The hypothesis of recent invasion of both elements is supported by phylogenetic incongruences revealed by network trees; in addition, the shortest time of divergence is found between the transposable sequences, rather than between the species involved. Moreover, <it>D. simulans</it> is thought to have transferred sequences of both elements to <it>D. melanogaster</it>. This species in turn would not have inherited or would have lost the active copy that existed in its ancestor as soon as it diverged, and all of its full-length sequences would have been derived from the sequence that was transferred from its sibling species. This introduction would have occurred in Africa before the worldwide expansion of the species, most likely in the late Pleistocene, during which <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans</it> returned to sympatry in Africa after diversification in allopatry. In <it>D. melanogaster</it>, the elements would be passed through a burst of transposition, producing a high number of full-length copies over several thousand years.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Methods</p>
			</st>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>
						<it>In silico</it> analyses</p>
				</st><p>The search for copies of the retrotransposon <it>412</it> and of the DNA transposon <it>Bari</it> in the sequenced genomes of species of <it>Drosophila melanogaster</it> group (release 5.18 of <it>D. melanogaster</it> and 1.3 for all other species <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>) was performed using BLASTn <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B47">47</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. The deposited sequences (Repbase databank <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B48">48</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>) described in <it>D. melanogaster</it> were used directly to search in this species. The <it>Bari</it> sequence used [GenBank: X67681] is 1,728 bp long and encodes a 340 aa transposase. The <it>412</it> sequence [GenBank: X04132] is 8,039 bp long and encodes a 452 aa <it>gag</it>-like protein and a 1,001 aa <it>pol</it>-like polyprotein (Reverse transcriptase, RNase H and Intregrase, respectively). For the other species, the deposited sequences were used to identify the reference sequence, i.e., the most complete and conserved sequence of each element in each species. These sequences were used to search for complete and incomplete copies in each genome. The complete copies were tested for the presence and integrity of the transposase gene (<it>Bari</it>) and <it>gag</it> and <it>pol</it> (<it>412</it>) using the software ORF Finder <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B49">49</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. In the search, the hits with the smallest e-values (&gt; 10<sup>-5</sup>) and highest RM scores (&gt; 225) were selected. Alignment, reconstruction of the phylogeny by maximum likelihood (ML), calculation of the rate of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site (<it>Ks</it>) and analysis of the Kimura 2-parameters distance (<it>K2p</it>) <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B50">50</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> were performed only for full-length sequences with both TIRs and LTRs, using the package Mega5 <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B51">51</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. The evolutionary relationships between sequences were also reconstructed using the package Network <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B52">52</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. The ages of the transposable elements were estimated using the molecular clock equation r&#8201;=&#8201;k/2 T, where <it>r</it> is the rate of neutral synonymous substitution in the genus <it>Drosophila</it> (r&#8201;=&#8201;0.011/site/million years <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> and <it>k</it> is the rate of divergence in the synonymous sites (<it>Ks</it>). The molecular-clock hypothesis assumes that when genes from different species are compared, the number of nucleotide changes is proportional to the speciation time. We then estimated the divergence time between species of the <it>melanogaster</it> group using the <it>Ks</it> values of the CDS of two host genes (ADH: Alcohol dehydrogenase and GAPDH: Glyceraldehyde 3 phosphate dehydrogenase 1; see Table 5S in Additional File <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr>) and of the <it>Bari</it> transposase. The ages of the insertions of the retrotransposon <it>412</it> were estimated using the date of divergence between both LTRs of each copy by <it>K2p</it> in the molecular clock equation.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Molecular analyses</p>
				</st><p>The phylogenetic relationships between the <it>Bari</it> sequences of strains of <it>D. melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans</it> of different geographic origin (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>) were also reconstructed. These strains were classified as ancestors (sampled in Africa) or invaders (ancient, sampled in Asia and Europe; or recent, sampled in Brazil) according to place of origin and literature reports <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>.</p>
				<table id="T1">
					<title>
						<p>Table 1</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>
							<b>Strains of</b><b>
								<it>D. melanogaster</it>
							</b><b>and</b><b>
								<it>D. simulans</it>
							</b><b>used in this study</b>
						</p>
					</caption>
					<tgroup align="left" cols="6">
						<colspec align="left" colname="c1" colnum="1" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="left" colname="c2" colnum="2" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="left" colname="c3" colnum="3" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="left" colname="c4" colnum="4" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c5" colnum="5" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c6" colnum="6" colwidth="1*"/>
						<thead valign="top">
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>
										<b>Species</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>
										<b>Classification with regard to the origin</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>
										<b>Geographic Origin</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>
										<b>Collector/Stock</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5" nameend="c6" namest="c5" rowsep="1">
									<p>
										<b>GenBank Accessions</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2"/>
								<entry colname="c3"/>
								<entry colname="c4"/>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5">
									<p>
										<b>
											<it>Bari-1</it>
										</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c6">
									<p>
										<b>412</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
						</thead>
						<tfoot>
							<p>Classification with the regard to geographic origin of the strains, name of the collectors or stock numbers and GenBank sequence accession numbers.</p>
						</tfoot>
						<tbody valign="top">
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>
										<it>D. melanogaster</it>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>Ancestral</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>Madagascar &#8211; Africa</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>David, J</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>JX140191-JX140203</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>JX140342-JX140346</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2"/>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>Congo &#8211; Africa</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>14021-0231.24</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>JX140204-JX140220</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>JX140347-JX140352</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>Ancient Invader</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>Draveil &#8211; France</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>David, J</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>JX140221-JX140237</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>JX140353-JX140361</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2"/>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>Delhi &#8211; Asia</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>David, J</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>JX140238-JX140256</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>JX140362-JX140368</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>Recent Invader</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>Florianopolis &#8211; Brazil</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>Granzotto, A</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>JX140257-JX140275</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>JX140369-JX140375</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>
										<it>D. simulans</it>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>Ancestral</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>Madagascar &#8211; Africa</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>David, J</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>JX140276-JX140288</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>JX140376-JX140389</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2"/>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>Zimbabwe &#8211; Africa</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>Begun, D</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>JX140289-JX140299</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>JX140390-JX140399</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>Ancient Invader</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>Draveil &#8211; France</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>Capy, P</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>JX140300-JX140307</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>JX140400-JX140411</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2"/>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>Gorak &#8211; New Guinea</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>14021-0251.009</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>JX140308-JX140318</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>JX140412-JX140420</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2">
									<p>Recent Invader</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>Florianopolis &#8211; Brazil</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>Granzotto, A</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>JX140319-JX140332</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>JX140421-JX140435</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry colname="c2"/>
								<entry colname="c3">
									<p>Pernambuco &#8211; Brazil</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c4">
									<p>Rohde, C</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c5">
									<p>JX140333-JX140341</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6">
									<p>JX140436-JX140445</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
						</tbody>
					</tgroup>
				</table><p>Genomic DNA was extracted from 50 individuals <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B53">53</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. DNA concentration and integrity was analyzed via spectrophotometer (NanoDrop). Amplification (PCR) was performed using specific primers that anneals to nucleotides 412 to 1,133 (total length of 722 bp) in the <it>Bari</it> transposase gene (<it>Bari</it>_F 5&#8217; CGG GCT GGT ATT GTT GCT AGG TTT 3&#8217; and <it>Bari</it>_R 5&#8217; ATC CTA CCC TTA TGG CAT GGA GCA 3&#8217;) and to nucleotides 5,622 &#8211; to 6,499 (total length of 878 bp) in the <it>412</it> integrase gene (<it>412</it>_F 5' TGG SCR AGG TCA WAR GAC AT 3&#8217; and <it>412</it>_R 5' RCT TTS TAT STT ATA GGG CC 3&#8217;), 0.625 unit of Taq polymerase (Invitrogen), 200 ng genomic DNA, 1 mM of MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 1 X buffer, 0.08 mM of dNTPs and 0.4 mM of each primer, for a final volume of 25 &#956;L. PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation (94&#176;C, 120 s); followed by 30 cycles of denaturation (94&#176;C, 45 s), annealing (69&#176;C for <it>Bari</it> and 59&#176;C for <it>412</it>, 45 s) and extension (72&#176;C, 60 s). Each PCR product was analyzed by gel electrophoresis on a 1.0% agarose gel, purified (DNA GFX DNA &amp; Gel Band, GE) and cloned (TOPO TA Cloning kit, Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer&#8217;s specifications. Approximately 30 (<it>D. melanogaster</it>) and 20 (<it>D. simulans</it>) clones were selected for plasmid extraction by phenol/chloroform protocol and sequenced using the universal primers M13F and M13R. The sequences produced were deposited in the GenBank database (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>).</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Competing interests</p>
			</st><p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Author&#8217;s contributions</p>
			</st><p>ESD conducted the bioinformatics and molecular analyses, and CMAC conceived and coordinated the project; both authors wrote the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
		</sec>
	</bdy>
	<bm>
		<ack>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Acknowledgements</p>
				</st><p>Funding for this project was provided by the Brazilian agencies FAPESP (Funda&#231;&#227;o de Amparo &#224; Pesquisa do Estado de S&#227;o Paulo - Grant 2010/10731-4 to CMAC and fellowship 2008/07629-3 to ESD), CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient&#237;fico e Tecnol&#243;gico<it>;</it> Grant 304880/2009-4 to CMAC) and FUNDUNESP (Funda&#231;&#227;o para o Desenvolvimento da UNESP<it>;</it> Grant 670/10).</p>
			</sec>
		</ack>
		<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>Modification of heat-shock gene expression in <it>Drosophila melanogaster</it> populations via transposable elements</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lerman</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Michalak</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Helin</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Bettencourt</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Feder</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Biol Evol</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>20</volume><fpage>135</fpage><lpage>144</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/molbev/msg015</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12519916</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>A distal enhancer and an ultraconserved exon are derived from a novel retroposon</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bejerano</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Lowe</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Ahituv</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>King</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Siepel</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Salama</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Rubin</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Kent</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Haussler</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>441</volume><fpage>87</fpage><lpage>90</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nature04696</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16625209</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Opinion - Transposable elements and the evolution of regulatory networks</p></title><aug><au><snm>Feschotte</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Nat Rev Genet</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>9</volume><fpage>397</fpage><lpage>405</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nrg2337</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2596197</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18368054</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>The Trickster in the genome: contribution and control of transposable elements</p></title><aug><au><snm>Nakayashiki</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Genes Cells</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>827</fpage><lpage>841</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2443.2011.01533.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21722269</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Origem, Prolifera&#231;&#227;o e Extin&#231;&#227;o de Elementos de Transpon&#237;veis: Qual Seria a Import&#226;ncia da Transfer&#234;ncia Horizontal na Manuten&#231;&#227;o desse Ciclo?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Almeida</snm><fnm>LM</fnm></au><au><snm>Carareto</snm><fnm>CMA</fnm></au></aug><source>S&#233;rie Monografias, SBG, Ribeir&#227;o Preto</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>1</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>40</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">23082321</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><aug><au><snm>Capy</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Langin</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Anxolabehere</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Bazin</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Dynamics and Evolution of Transposable Elements</source><publisher>Austin: Landes Bioscience</publisher><edition>1</edition><pubdate>1998</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Promiscuous DNA: horizontal transfer of transposable elements and why it matters for eukaryotic evolution</p></title><aug><au><snm>Schaack</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Gilbert</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Feschotte</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Trends Ecol Evol</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>25</volume><fpage>537</fpage><lpage>546</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.tree.2010.06.001</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2940939</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20591532</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>Revisiting horizontal transfer of transposable elements in <it>Drosophila</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Loreto</snm><fnm>ELS</fnm></au><au><snm>Carareto</snm><fnm>CMA</fnm></au><au><snm>Capy</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Heredity</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>100</volume><fpage>545</fpage><lpage>554</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/sj.hdy.6801094</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18431403</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>Tropical Africa as a cradle for horizontal transfers of transposable elements between species of the genus <it>Drosophila</it> and <it>Zaprionus</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Carareto</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Mobile Genetics Elements</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>2</volume><fpage>179</fpage><lpage>186</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>Historical biogeography of the <it>Drosophila melanogaster</it> species subgroup</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lachaise</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Cariou</snm><fnm>ML</fnm></au><au><snm>David</snm><fnm>JR</fnm></au><au><snm>Lemeunier</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Tsacas</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Ashburner</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Evolutionary Biology</source><pubdate>1988</pubdate><volume>22</volume><fpage>159</fpage><lpage>225</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>Population Genetics and phylogenetics of DNA sequence variation at multiple loci within the <it>Drosophila melanogaster</it> species complex</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hey</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Kliman</snm><fnm>RM</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Biol Evol</source><pubdate>1993</pubdate><volume>10</volume><fpage>804</fpage><lpage>822</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8355601</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>How two Afrotropical endemics made two cosmopolitan human commensals: the Drosophila melanogaster-D. simulans palaeogeographic riddle</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lachaise</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Silvain</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetica</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>120</volume><fpage>17</fpage><lpage>39</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">15088644</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>A supertree analysis and literature review of the genus <it>Drosophila</it> and closely related genera (Diptera, Drosophilidae)</p></title><aug><au><snm>van der Linde</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Houle</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Insect Systematics &amp; Evolution</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>39</volume><fpage>241</fpage><lpage>267</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1163/187631208788784237</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">23065226</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Increasing the data size to accurately reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships between nine subgroups of the <it>Drosophila melanogaster</it> species group (Drosophilidae, Diptera)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Yang</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Hou</snm><fnm>Z-C</fnm></au><au><snm>Qian</snm><fnm>Y-H</fnm></au><au><snm>Kang</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Zeng</snm><fnm>Q-T</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Phylogenet Evol</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>62</volume><fpage>214</fpage><lpage>223</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.ympev.2011.09.018</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21985965</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>Chromosomal aberrations in Brazilian <it>Drosophila ananassae</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Dobzhansky</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Dreyfus</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci</source><pubdate>1943</pubdate><volume>29</volume><fpage>301</fpage><lpage>305</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.29.10.301</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1078619</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">16588615</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>Evolution of genes and genomes on the <it>Drosophila</it> phylogeny</p></title><aug><au><snm>Clark</snm><fnm>AG</fnm></au><au><snm>Eisen</snm><fnm>MB</fnm></au><au><snm>Smith</snm><fnm>DR</fnm></au><au><snm>Bergman</snm><fnm>CM</fnm></au><au><snm>Oliver</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Markow</snm><fnm>TA</fnm></au><au><snm>Kaufman</snm><fnm>TC</fnm></au><au><snm>Kellis</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Gelbart</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Iyer</snm><fnm>VN</fnm></au><etal/></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>450</volume><fpage>203</fpage><lpage>218</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nature06341</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17994087</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><title><p>Population genomic and bioinformatic studies reveal evolutionary history of <it>Drosophila ananassae</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Das</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Curr Sci</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>89</volume><fpage>1316</fpage><lpage>1321</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>High rate of horizontal transfer of transposable elements in <it>Drosophila</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Sanchez-Gracia</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Maside</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Charlesworth</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au></aug><source>Trends Genet</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>24</volume><fpage>200</fpage><lpage>203</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>Widespread evidence for horizontal transfer of transposable elements across <it>Drosophila</it> genomes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bartolome</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Bello</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Maside</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au></aug><source>Genome Biol</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>10</volume><fpage>R22</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/gb-2009-10-2-r22</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2688281</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19226459</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B20"><title><p>Comparative analysis of transposable elements in the melanogaster subgroup sequenced genomes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lerat</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Burlet</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Bi&#233;mont</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Vieira</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Gene</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>473</volume><fpage>100</fpage><lpage>109</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21156200</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p><it>Bari-1</it>, a new transposon-like family in Drosophila melanogaster with a unique heterochromatic organization</p></title><aug><au><snm>Caizzi</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Caggese</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Pimpinelli</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>1993</pubdate><volume>133</volume><fpage>335</fpage><lpage>345</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">1205323</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8382176</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B22"><title><p>Intra- and interspecies variation among <it>Bari-1</it> elements of the melanogaster species group</p></title><aug><au><snm>Moschetti</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Caggese</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Barsanti</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Caizzi</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>150</volume><fpage>239</fpage><lpage>250</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">1460315</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9725843</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B23"><title><p>Conserved motifs and dynamic aspects of the terminal inverted repeat organization within Bari-like transposons</p></title><aug><au><snm>Moschetti</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Chlamydas</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Marsano</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Caizzi</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Genet Genomics</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>279</volume><fpage>451</fpage><lpage>461</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00438-008-0324-7</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18247055</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B24"><title><p>New regulatory regions of <it>Drosophila 412</it> retrotransposable element generated by recombination</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mugnier</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Biemont</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Vieira</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Biol Evol</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>22</volume><fpage>747</fpage><lpage>757</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15574808</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B25"><title><p>Temporal Patterns of Fruit Fly (<it>Drosophila</it>) Evolution Revealed by Mutation Clocks</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tamura</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Subramanian</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Kumar</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Biol Evol</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>36</fpage><lpage>44</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12949132</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B26"><title><p>Intraspecific gene genealogies: trees grafting into networks</p></title><aug><au><snm>Posada</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Crandall</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Trends Ecol Evol</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>37</fpage><lpage>45</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02026-7</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11146143</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B27"><title><p>Retrotransposition of <it>Alu</it> elements: how many sources?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Cordaux</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Hedges</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Batzer</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au></aug><source>Trends Genet</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>20</volume><fpage>464</fpage><lpage>467</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.tig.2004.07.012</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15363897</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B28"><title><p>A phylogeny of Drosophilidae using the <it>Amyrel</it> gene: questioning the <it>Drosophila melanogaster</it> species group boundaries</p></title><aug><au><snm>Da Lage</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Kergoat</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Maczkowiak</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Silvain</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Cariou</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Lachaise</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>45</volume><fpage>47</fpage><lpage>63</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1439-0469.2006.00389.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B29"><title><p><it>Drosophila</it> Euchromatic LTR Retrotransposons are Much Younger Than the Host Species in Which They Reside</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bowen</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>McDonald</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Genome Res</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>11</volume><fpage>1527</fpage><lpage>1540</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1101/gr.164201</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">311128</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11544196</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B30"><title><p>The heterochromatic copies of the LTR retrotransposons as a record of the genomic events that have shaped the <it>Drosophila melanogaster</it> genome</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mugnier</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Gueguen</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Vieira</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Biemont</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Gene</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>411</volume><fpage>87</fpage><lpage>93</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.gene.2008.01.010</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18281162</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B31"><title><p>Distribution of the retrotransposable element 412 in <it>Drosophila</it> species</p></title><aug><au><snm>Cizeron</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Lemeunier</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Loevenbruck</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Brehm</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Biemont</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Biol Evol</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>15</volume><fpage>1589</fpage><lpage>1599</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025887</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9866195</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B32"><title><p>The distribution of the transposable element Bari-1 in the <it>Drosophila melanogaster</it> and <it>Drosophila simulans</it> genomes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Caggese</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Pimpinelli</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Barsanti</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Caizzi</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetica</source><pubdate>1995</pubdate><volume>96</volume><fpage>269</fpage><lpage>283</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF01439581</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">8522166</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B33"><title><p>Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of Drosophilid species</p></title><aug><au><snm>Russo</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Takezaki</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Nei</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Biol Evol</source><pubdate>1995</pubdate><volume>12</volume><fpage>391</fpage><lpage>404</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">7739381</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B34"><title><p>Evidence for interspecific transfer of the transposable element mariner between <it>Drosophila</it> and <it>Zaprionus</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Maruyama</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Hartl</snm><fnm>DL</fnm></au></aug><source>J Mol Evol</source><pubdate>1991</pubdate><volume>33</volume><fpage>514</fpage><lpage>524</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF02102804</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">1664000</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B35"><source>Hybrid dysgenesis determinants</source><publisher>New York: Academic Pres</publisher><editor>Bregliano JC, Kidwell MG</editor><pubdate>1983</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B36"><title><p>Evidence for the recent horizontal transfer of long terminal repeat retrotransposon</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jordan</snm><fnm>IK</fnm></au><au><snm>Matyunina</snm><fnm>LV</fnm></au><au><snm>McDonald</snm><fnm>JF</fnm></au></aug><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>96</volume><fpage>12621</fpage><lpage>12625</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.96.22.12621</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">23018</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10535972</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B37"><title><p>High rate of horizontal transfer of transposable elements in <it>Drosophila</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Sanchez-Gracia</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Maside</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Charlesworth</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au></aug><source>Trends Genet</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>200</fpage><lpage>203</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.tig.2005.02.001</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15797612</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B38"><title><p>Multiple invasions of Errantivirus in the genus <it>Drosophila</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Ludwig</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Valente</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Loreto</snm><fnm>ELS</fnm></au></aug><source>Insect Mol Biol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>17</volume><fpage>113</fpage><lpage>124</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2583.2007.00787.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18353101</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B39"><title><p>Evolution of <it>Tom, 297, 17.6</it> and rover retrotransposons in Drosophilidae species</p></title><aug><au><snm>Vidal</snm><fnm>NM</fnm></au><au><snm>Ludwig</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Loreto</snm><fnm>ELS</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Genet Genomics</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>282</volume><fpage>351</fpage><lpage>362</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00438-009-0468-0</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19585148</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B40"><title><p>The hobo transposon and hobo-related elements are expressed as developmental genes in <it>Drosophila</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Depra</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Valente</snm><fnm>VLD</fnm></au><au><snm>Margis</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Loreto</snm><fnm>ELS</fnm></au></aug><source>Gene</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>448</volume><fpage>57</fpage><lpage>63</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.gene.2009.08.012</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19720121</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B41"><title><p>Multiple invasions of <it>Gypsy</it> and <it>Micropia</it> retroelements in genus <it>Zaprionus</it> and <it>melanogaster</it> subgroup of the genus <it>Drosophila</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>de Setta</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Van Sluys</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au><au><snm>Capy</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Carareto</snm><fnm>CMA</fnm></au></aug><source>BMC Evol Biol</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>9</volume><fpage>279</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2148-9-279</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2797524</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19954522</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B42"><title><p>Comparative analysis of transposable elements in the <it>melanogaster</it> subgroup sequenced genomes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lerat</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Burlet</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Biemont</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Vieira</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Gene</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>473</volume><fpage>100</fpage><lpage>109</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.gene.2010.11.009</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21156200</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B43"><title><p>Distribution of the <it>Bari-I</it> transposable element in stable hybrid strains between <it>Drosophila melanogaster</it> and <it>Drosophila simulans</it> and in Brazilian populations of these species</p></title><aug><au><snm>de Lucca</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Carareto</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Ceron</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics and Molecular Biology</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>30</volume><fpage>676</fpage><lpage>680</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1590/S1415-47572007000400028</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B44"><title><p>Hybrids between <it>Drosophila melanogaster</it> and <it>D. simulans</it> in nature</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sperlich</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Drosophila Information Service</source><pubdate>1962</pubdate><volume>36</volume><fpage>118</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B45"><title><p>Genomewide comparative analysis of the highly abundant transposable element DINE-1 suggests a recent transpositional burst in <it>Drosophila yakuba</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Yang</snm><fnm>HP</fnm></au><au><snm>Hung</snm><fnm>TL</fnm></au><au><snm>You</snm><fnm>TL</fnm></au><au><snm>Yang</snm><fnm>TH</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>173</volume><fpage>189</fpage><lpage>196</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1534/genetics.105.051714</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1461449</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16387876</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B46"><title><p>Complex evolution of gypsy in drosophilid species</p></title><aug><au><snm>Heredia</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Loreto</snm><fnm>ELS</fnm></au><au><snm>Valente</snm><fnm>VLS</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Biol Evol</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>1831</fpage><lpage>1842</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/molbev/msh183</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15175416</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B47"><title><p>Basic local alignment search tool</p></title><aug><au><snm>Altschul</snm><fnm>SF</fnm></au><au><snm>Gish</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Miller</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Myers</snm><fnm>EW</fnm></au><au><snm>Lipman</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au></aug><source>J Mol Biol</source><pubdate>1990</pubdate><volume>215</volume><fpage>403</fpage><lpage>410</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">2231712</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B48"><title><p>Repbase update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jurka</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Kapitonov</snm><fnm>VV</fnm></au><au><snm>Pavlicek</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Klonowski</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Kohany</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Walichiewicz</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Cytogenet Genome Res</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>110</volume><fpage>462</fpage><lpage>467</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1159/000084979</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16093699</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B49"><source>Open Reading Frame Finder</source><note>
   <url>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/gorf.html</url>
</note></bibl><bibl id="B50"><title><p>A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kimura</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Molecular Evolution</source><pubdate>1980</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>111</fpage><lpage>120</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF01731581</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">7463489</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B51"><title><p>MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tamura</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Peterson</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Peterson</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Stecher</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Nei</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kumar</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Biol Evol</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>28</volume><fpage>2731</fpage><lpage>2739</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/molbev/msr121</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">3203626</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21546353</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B52"><title><p>Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bandelt</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Forster</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Rohl</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Biol Evol</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>37</fpage><lpage>48</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026036</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10331250</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B53"><title><p>Preparation of nucleic acids</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jowett</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>In Drosophila: A Practical Approach</source><publisher>Oxford: IRL Press</publisher><editor>Roberts DB</editor><pubdate>1986</pubdate><fpage>275</fpage><lpage>285</lpage></bibl></refgrp>
	</bm>
</art>