<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art><ui>1471-2148-11-45</ui><ji>1471-2148</ji><fm>
<dochead>Research article</dochead>
<bibl>
<title>
<p>The origin of multicellularity in cyanobacteria</p>
</title>
<aug>
<au ca="yes" id="A1"><snm>Schirrmeister</snm><mi>E</mi><fnm>Bettina</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>bettina.schirrmeister@ieu.uzh.ch</email></au>
<au id="A2"><snm>Antonelli</snm><fnm>Alexandre</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><insr iid="I3"/><email>alexandre.antonelli@vgregion.se</email></au>
<au id="A3"><snm>Bagheri</snm><mi>C</mi><fnm>Homayoun</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>bagheri@ieu.uzh.ch</email></au>
</aug>
<insg>
<ins id="I1"><p>Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</p></ins>
<ins id="I2"><p>Institute of Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</p></ins>
<ins id="I3"><p><it>Current Address</it>: Gothenburg Botanical Garden, G&#246;teborg, Sweden</p></ins>
</insg>
<source>BMC Evolutionary Biology</source>
<issn>1471-2148</issn>
<pubdate>2011</pubdate>
<volume>11</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>45</fpage>
<url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/45</url>
<xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2148-11-45</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">21320320</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
</bibl>
<history><rec><date><day>15</day><month>10</month><year>2010</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>14</day><month>2</month><year>2011</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>14</day><month>2</month><year>2011</year></date></pub></history>
<cpyrt><year>2011</year><collab>Schirrmeister et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
<abs>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Abstract</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Background</p>
</st>
<p>Cyanobacteria are one of the oldest and morphologically most diverse prokaryotic phyla on our planet. The early development of an oxygen-containing atmosphere approximately 2.45 - 2.22 billion years ago is attributed to the photosynthetic activity of cyanobacteria. Furthermore, they are one of the few prokaryotic phyla where multicellularity has evolved. Understanding when and how multicellularity evolved in these ancient organisms would provide fundamental information on the early history of life and further our knowledge of complex life forms.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results</p>
</st>
<p>We conducted and compared phylogenetic analyses of 16S rDNA sequences from a large sample of taxa representing the morphological and genetic diversity of cyanobacteria. We reconstructed ancestral character states on 10,000 phylogenetic trees. The results suggest that the majority of extant cyanobacteria descend from multicellular ancestors. Reversals to unicellularity occurred at least 5 times. Multicellularity was established again at least once within a single-celled clade. Comparison to the fossil record supports an early origin of multicellularity, possibly as early as the "Great Oxygenation Event" that occurred 2.45 - 2.22 billion years ago.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusions</p>
</st>
<p>The results indicate that a multicellular morphotype evolved early in the cyanobacterial lineage and was regained at least once after a previous loss. Most of the morphological diversity exhibited in cyanobacteria today &#8212;including the majority of single-celled species&#8212; arose from ancient multicellular lineages. Multicellularity could have conferred a considerable advantage for exploring new niches and hence facilitated the diversification of new lineages.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</abs>
</fm><bdy>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Background</p>
</st>
<p>Cyanobacteria are oxygenic phototrophic prokaryotes from which chloroplasts, the light harvesting organelles in plants, evolved. Some are able to convert atmospheric nitrogen into a form usable for plants and animals. During Earth history, cyanobacteria have raised atmospheric oxygen levels starting approximately 2.45 - 2.22 billion years ago and provided the basis for the evolution of aerobic respiration <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Cyanobacteria have also evolved extensive morphological diversity. Various patterns of cell organization exist, ranging from single-celled to differentiated multicellular forms with branching patterns. Species of this phylum occupy various habitats. They can be found in marine, freshwater or terrestrial environments, ranging from polar to tropical climate zones. Based on their morphology, they have been divided into five sections <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp> (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). Sections I and II comprise single-celled bacteria, whereas sections III to V comprise multicellular forms. The latter sections are distinguished according to their level of organization. Section III is multicellular and undifferentiated, sections IV and V are multicellular and differentiated. The latter have the ability to produce heterocysts for nitrogen fixation and akinetes (climate-resistant resting cells). In addition, species in section V have the ability to branch in multiple dimensions.</p>
<tbl id="T1"><title><p>Table 1</p></title><caption><p>Subset of cyanobacterial taxa used for the analyses with GenBank accession numbers for 16S rDNA sequences</p></caption><tblbdy cols="4">
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>unicellular strains</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <b>accession numbers</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>multicellular strains</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <b>accession numbers</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Section I</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Section III</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Chamaesiphon subglobosus </it>PCC 7430<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AY170472">AY170472</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Arthronema gygaxiana </it>UTCC 393</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AF218370">AF218370</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Cyanobium sp</it>. JJ23-1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AM710371">AM710371</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Arthrospira platensis </it>PCC 8005</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="X70769">X70769</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Cyanothece sp</it>. PCC 8801<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AF296873">AF296873</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Crinalium magnum </it>SAG 34.87</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AB115965">AB115965</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Chroococcus sp</it>. JJCM</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AM710384">AM710384</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <it>Filamentous thermophilic cyanobacterium</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="DQ471441">DQ471441</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Dactylococcopsis sp</it>.<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ000711">AJ000711</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Geitlerinema sp</it>. BBD HS217<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="EF110974">EF110974</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Gloeobacter violaceus </it>PCC 7421<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="BA000045">BA000045</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Halospirulina sp</it>.<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="NR_026510">NR_026510</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Gloeothece sp</it>. PCC 6909/1<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="EU499305">EU499305</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Leptolyngbya sp</it>. ANT.LH52.1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AY493584">AY493584</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Microcystis aeruginosa </it>strain 038<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="DQ363254">DQ363254</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Lyngbya aestuarii </it>PCC 7419<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AB075989">AB075989</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Prochlorococcus sp</it>. MIT9313<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AF053399">AF053399</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Microcoleus chthonoplastes </it>PCC 7420<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AM709630">AM709630</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Prochloron sp</it>.<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="X63141">X63141</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Oscillatoria sp</it>.<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ133106">AJ133106</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Radiocystis sp</it>. JJ30-3</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AM710389">AM710389</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Oscillatoria sancta </it>PCC 7515</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AF132933">AF132933</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Synechococcus elongatus </it>PCC 6301<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AP008231">AP008231</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Phormidium mucicola </it>IAM M-221</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AB003165">AB003165</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Synechococcus sp</it>. CC9605</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AY172802">AY172802</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Plectonema sp</it>. F3<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AF091110">AF091110</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Synechococcus sp</it>. WH8101</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AF001480">AF001480</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Planktothrix sp</it>. FP1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="EU078515">EU078515</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Synechocystis sp</it>. PCC 6803</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="NC_000911">NC_000911</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <it>Prochlorothrix hollandica</it>
               <sup>1</sup>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ007907">AJ007907</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Synechocystis sp</it>. PCC 6308<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AB039001">AB039001</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Pseudanabaena sp</it>. PCC 6802</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AB039016">AB039016</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Synechocystis sp</it>. CR_L29<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="EF545641">EF545641</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Pseudanabaena sp</it>. PCC 7304 <sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AF132933">AF132933</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Synechococcus sp</it>. P1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AF132774">AF132774</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Spirulina sp</it>. PCC 6313</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="X75045">X75045</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Synechococcus sp</it>. C9<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AF132773">AF132773</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Starria zimbabweensis </it>SAG 74.90<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AB115962">AB115962</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Synechococcus lividus </it>C1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AF132772">AF132772</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Symploca sp</it>.PCC 8002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AB039021">AB039021</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Acaryochloris sp</it>. JJ8A6<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AM710387">AM710387</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Trichodesmium erythraeum </it>IMS 101<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AF013030">AF013030</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Thermosynechococcus elongatus </it>BP-1<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="BA000039">BA000039</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Section IV</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Section II</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Anabaena sp</it>. PCC 7108</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ133162">AJ133162</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Chroococcidiopsis sp</it>. CC2</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="DQ914864">DQ914864</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Calothrix sp</it>. PCC 7103<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AM230700">AM230700</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Dermocarpa sp</it>. MBIC10768</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AB058287">AB058287</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Nodularia sp</it>. PCC 7804<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ133181">AJ133181</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <it>Dermocarpella incrassata</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ344559">AJ344559</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Nostoc sp</it>. PCC 7120</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="X59559">X59559</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Myxosarcina sp</it>. PCC 7312<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ344561">AJ344561</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Scytonema sp</it>. U-3-3<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AY069954">AY069954</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Myxosarcina sp</it>. PCC 7325</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ344562">AJ344562</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Section V</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Pleurocapsa sp</it>. CALU 1126</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="DQ293994">DQ293994</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Chlorogloeopsis sp</it>. PCC 7518<sup>1</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="X68780">X68780</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Pleurocapsa sp</it>. PCC 7516</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="X78681">X78681</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Fischerella sp</it>. PCC 7414</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AB075986">AB075986</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Symphyonema sp</it>. strain 1517</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ544084">AJ544084</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Eubacteria</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <it>Beggiatoa sp. 'Chiprana'</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="EF428583">EF428583</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p><sup>1</sup>species used to test substitutional saturation</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<p>Different interpretations of multicellularity are currently used <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. For cyanobacteria, characterization of multicellularity has been described in previous studies <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Cell to cell adhesion, intercellular communication, and for more complex species, terminal cell differentiation seem to be three essential processes that define multicellular, prokaryotic organisms on this planet <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Some forms of complexity found in several multicellular eukaryotes are not present in prokaryotes, but simple forms of multicellularity can be identified in three sections of the phylum cyanobacteria. Multicellular patterns comprise basic filamentous forms as found for section III, as well as more complex forms involving terminal differentiation, present in sections IV and V. In eukaryotes, multicellular complexity ranges from what is comparable to cyanobacteria to cases with up to 55 cell types as estimated for higher invertebrates such as arthropods or molluscs <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Considering that cyanobacterial sections III, IV and V resemble some of the first forms of multicellular filaments on Earth, knowing when and how these shapes evolved would further our understanding of complex life forms.</p>
<p>Some of the oldest body fossils unambiguously identified as cyanobacteria have been found in the Kasegalik and McLeary Formations of the Belcher Subgroup, Canada, and are evaluated to be between 1.8 billion and 2.5 billion years old <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Studies from ~ 2.0 billion year old formations <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
</abbrgrp> contain both unicellular and multicellular morphotypes of cyanobacteria. Cyanobacteria certainly existed as early as 2.32 billion years ago, if one accepts the assumption that they were responsible for the rapid accumulation of oxygen levels, known as the "Great Oxygenation Event" <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Multicellular fossils belonging to the cyanobacteria are well known from the late Precambrian <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and possibly already existed 2.32 billion years ago. Other microbe-like multicellular filaments even older than 3.0 billion years have been found several times <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Some of the latter fossils are morphologically similar to species from the cyanobacterial order Oscillatoriales <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
<abbr bid="B28">28</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, but no clear evidence has been adduced yet. Although biogenicity of some of the oldest fossils has been questioned <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B29">29</abbr>
<abbr bid="B30">30</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, a large variety of bacteria including anoxic phototrophs already existed by the time cyanobacteria evolved oxygenic photosynthesis <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Though impressive for prokaryotes, the fragmentary fossil record alone is not sufficient to disentangle the origin of cyanobacteria and their morphological phenotypes. Therefore, additional methods such as phylogenetic analysis provide a promising possibility to gather further clues on the evolution of such a complex phylum.</p>
<p>Phylogenetic analyses of cyanobacteria have gained in quantity over the past 20 years <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
<abbr bid="B31">31</abbr>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
<abbr bid="B39">39</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. These studies have shown that morphological characterization does not necessarily reflect true relationships between taxa, and possibly none of the five traditional morphological sections is monophyletic. Similar morphologies must have evolved several times independently, but details on this morphological evolution are scarce. Analyses assessing characteristics of cyanobacterial ancestors <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
<abbr bid="B39">39</abbr>
</abbrgrp> provide not only fundamental information on the history of cyanobacteria, but also on the evolution of life forms in the Archean Eon.</p>
<p>If one studies phylogenetic relationships based on protein coding genes in bacteria, it is possible to encounter the outcome of horizontal gene transfer (HGT) <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B40">40</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. This issue is not as problematic for ribosomal DNA <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B41">41</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Nonetheless, the problem could be potentially reduced by analyzing datasets of concatenated conserved genes. Identification of these genes for phylogenetic analyses is not without difficulty, and requires in an ideal case comparison of complete genome data <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B42">42</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In cyanobacteria, many phylogenetic studies have concentrated on specific clades or smaller subsets of known species in this diverse phylum <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B39">39</abbr>
<abbr bid="B43">43</abbr>
<abbr bid="B44">44</abbr>
<abbr bid="B45">45</abbr>
<abbr bid="B46">46</abbr>
<abbr bid="B47">47</abbr>
<abbr bid="B48">48</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Therefore the genomic data presently available are strongly biased towards certain groups. In particular, genomic studies in cyanobacteria have emphasized marine species from Section I. Marine microphytoplankton (<it>Synechococcus </it>and <it>Prochlorococcus</it>) are a particularly well studied group <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B43">43</abbr>
<abbr bid="B45">45</abbr>
<abbr bid="B47">47</abbr>
<abbr bid="B48">48</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, reflected by 19 sequenced genomes out of 41 cyanobacterial genomes sequenced to date (<url>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/lproks.cgi</url>, accessed in January 2011). From species belonging to section III only two genomes (<it>Trichodesmium erythraeum </it>and <it>Arthrospira platensis</it>) are known. For sections IV (four genomes known) and V (no genomes known) molecular data are rare or missing. As genomic data accumulate, promising phylogenomic approaches to cyanobacteria are being established <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
<abbr bid="B39">39</abbr>
<abbr bid="B47">47</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Despite these advances, it is at present difficult to obtain sequences other then 16S rDNA to cover a representative sample of species from all five sections.</p>
<p>The aim of this paper is to use molecular phylogenetic methods to address the evolutionary history of cyanobacteria and the evolution of multicellularity. For this purpose, we established a phylogeny based on 16S rDNA sequences belonging to 1,254 cyanobacterial taxa. From that phylogeny we sampled 58 cyanobacterial taxa that represent all main clades obtained and all five sections described by Castenholz <it>et </it>
<it>al</it>. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, and feature a 1:1 ratio of unicellular to multicellular species. We used several methods to reconstruct the morphological evolution of ancestral lineages, and compared our results to known fossil data. Since the fossil record is inconclusive on the timing and taxonomic position of multicellular cyanobacteria, our study provides independent evidence on the first appearance and evolution of multicellularity among the ancestors of living cyanobacteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results and Discussion</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Phylogenetic analysis</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Phylogenetic analyses of all identified cyanobacteria</p>
</st>
<p>To infer the evolution of multicellularity in cyanobacteria we carried out several phylogenetic analyses. To ensure a correct taxon-sampling, a phylogeny containing 1,254 16S rDNA sequences of cyanobacteria obtained from GenBank was reconstructed (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). Cyanobacterial morphotypes were assigned to four groups (A-D) which correlate to the five sections described by Castenholz <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Using this nomenclature, sub-groups in the phylogeny were assigned to one of the four different morphological groups (A-D) according to their dominant shape. In total 14 sub-groups were identified for the phylogenetic tree. Five sub-groups consist of unicellular species from section I (A1-A5), two sub-groups are composed of single celled section II bacteria (B1, B2), four sub-groups are made up of multicellular species belonging to section III (C1-C4) and two sub-groups cover differentiated species from section IV and V (D1-D2). One sub-group contains both species from section I and III and is therefore designated as AC1. The phylogeny further contains six chloroplast genomes from the eukaryotic phyla Glaucophyta, Rhodophyta and the division Chlorophyta. Chloroplast sequences branch close to the bases and form a sister group to the cyanobacterial sub-groups mentioned. Furthermore six different Eubacteria were included in the phylogeny. They appear to form a distinct outgroup to the cyanobacteria and chloroplasts.</p>
<fig id="F1"><title><p>Figure 1</p></title><caption><p>Phylogenetic tree of 1,254 cyanobacterial species</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Phylogenetic tree of 1,254 cyanobacterial species</b>. Maximum likelihood phylogram of cyanobacteria, based on GTR+G+I substitution model. Six eubacterial species form an outgroup. The ingroup contains 1,254 cyanobacterial strains and six different chloroplast sequences. Bootstrap values (> 50%) calculated from 100 re-samplings are displayed at the nodes. Colors define major morphological characters in the groups. Yellow are single-celled cyanobacteria of section I; orange single-celled from section II; green are multicellular, undifferentiated cyanobacteria from section III; blue are multicellular and differentiated bacteria from section IV; and pink from section V. Sections as described by Castenholz 2001 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>. Different sub-groups (AC1;A1-A5;B1, B2;C1-C4;D1-D2) are defined for the phylogeny. Nomenclature of groups correlates with morphological sections as illustrated in the legend. From these sub-groups taxa were sampled for further analyses. A complete list with species included in the analysis can be found in Additional File <supplr sid="S7">7</supplr>.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2148-11-45-1" hint_layout="double"/></fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Phylogenetic analyses to identify an outgroup</p>
</st>
<p>Rooted and unrooted phylogenetic analyses reconstructed with maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference and based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of 27 eubacterial species, including 5 cyanobacteria revealed congruent results. Cyanobacteria form a monophyletic group. Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr> shows the unrooted Bayesian consensus tree which supports cyanobacterial monophyly with posterior probabilities (PP)/bootstrap values (BV) of 1.0/100%. Phylogenetic trees constructed with an archaean outgroup support cyanobacterial monophyly with PP/BV of 1.0/98% (Additional File <supplr sid="S1">1</supplr>). In both cases, <it>Plantomyces </it>
<it>brasilienses </it>and <it>Chlamydia trachomatis</it>, both gram negative bacteria, form a sister group to the cyanobacteria. This does not agree with other studies <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B49">49</abbr>
<abbr bid="B50">50</abbr>
<abbr bid="B51">51</abbr>
<abbr bid="B52">52</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, where <it>Deinococcus-thermus </it>was suggested to be the closest eubacterial relative to cyanobacteria. These discrepancies may be due to a lack of information when solely using 16S rRNA gene sequences for such distant relations. Furthermore, our results confirm the basal position of <it>Gloeobacter violaceus</it>, closest to the rest of the eubacteria, as found elsewhere <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B51">51</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. This supports previous findings which state that <it>Gloeobacter violaceus </it>diverged very early from cyanobacteria living today <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
<abbr bid="B53">53</abbr>
<abbr bid="B54">54</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. <it>Gloeobacter </it>shows differences in cell structure and metabolism that clearly distinguish it from the rest of extant cyanobacteria <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B55">55</abbr>
<abbr bid="B56">56</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. It lacks thylacoid membranes and many genes from Photosystems I and II. Phylogenetic relations of the other eubacterial species show only weak support and are therefore not discussed further.</p>
<fig id="F2"><title><p>Figure 2</p></title><caption><p>Unrooted Bayesian consensus tree of Eubacteria including five cyanobacterial species</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Unrooted Bayesian consensus tree of Eubacteria including five cyanobacterial species</b>. Unrooted phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA gene sequences from 27 eubacterial species reconstructed using Bayesian methods. Posterior probabilities (black) and bootstrap values (red) from 100 re-samplings are displayed at the nodes. Cyanobacteria, represented by 5 species, form a monophyletic group with <it>Gloeobacter violaceus </it>being closest to other eubacterial species.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2148-11-45-2" hint_layout="double"/></fig>
<suppl id="S1">
<title>
<p>Additional file 1</p>
</title>
<text>
<p>
<b>Rooted Bayesian consensus tree of 27 eubacterial species including five cyanobacterial species</b>. Bayesian analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences from 27 Eubacteria, based on GTR+I+G substitution model with an archaean outgroup. Posterior probabilities (black) and bootstrap values (red) from 100 re-samplings are displayed at the nodes. Cyanobacteria (blue-green box) are strongly supported as a monophyletic group with <it>Gloeobacter violaceus </it>being closest to other eubacterial species.</p>
</text>
<file name="1471-2148-11-45-S1.pdf">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<p>We separately tested each of the 22 eubacterial species originating from a diverse set of non-cyanobacterial phyla, with a subset of the cyanobacteria (58 taxa). The latter were chosen from the large dataset containing 1,254 taxa, and cover all sub-groups of the tree (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). This subset was used for all subsequent phylogenetic analyses. Though multicellular species seem to dominate the known cyanobacteria, we chose to sample a taxa set containing unicellular and multicellular morphotypes in a 1:1 ratio. That way biases towards certain character states would be excluded. Furthermore, taxa used in the analyses should represent species from all five sections described by Castenholz <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Given our interest in the base of the phylogeny, a greater number of taxa were sampled from basal sub-groups. Due to a lack of data available on GenBank at the present state of research, efforts to build a phylogenetic reconstruction of this size (58 species) using additional ribosomal protein sequences failed. But genomic data are accumulating (57 genomes in progress according to GenBank) and will soon offer possibilities for further extensive analyses.</p>
<p>Results of six phylogenetic trees are displayed in Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr> (Additional file <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr>: Newick format of all trees). The majority of the trees exhibit a topology that agrees with Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>, with the position of <it>Gloeobacter violaceus </it>close to the outgroup. Strong differences are found in group support within the trees. In 14 of the 22 trees, three nodes could be identified which lead to three clades, named here E (<b>E</b>ntire five sections(A-D)), AC and C (nomenclature as described for the large tree; Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). <it>Gloebacter violaceus </it>and <it>Synechococcus P1 </it>are found at the base of the cyanobacterial phylogeny in 16 trees, from which 7 trees exhibit <it>Gloeobacter violaceus </it>closest to the eubacterial outgroup.</p>
<fig id="F3"><title><p>Figure 3</p></title><caption><p>Bayesian consensus trees of cyanobacterial subset using different eubacterial outgroups</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Bayesian consensus trees of cyanobacterial subset using dierent eubacterial outgroups</b>. Six out of 22 phylogenetic trees reconstructed with Bayesian inference. For each tree an outgroup from a different eubacterial phylum was chosen. Posterior probabilities are displayed at the nodes. Green color represents multicellular cyanobacteria from section III, green-yellow gradient covers species from unicellular section I and multicellular section III, and purple depicts all five different morphological sections present in cyanobacteria. The majority of outgroups exhibits a similar tree topology. For further analyses <it>Beggiatoa sp</it>. was selected as an outgroup.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2148-11-45-3" hint_layout="single"/></fig>
<suppl id="S2">
<title>
<p>Additional file 2</p>
</title>
<text>
<p>
<b>Bayesian consensus trees of cyanobacterial subset and different outgroups - newick format</b>. 22 Bayesian consensus trees with posterior probabilities of a cyanobacterial subset (58 taxa) and different eubacterial outgroups, displayed in newick format. Trees were run for 10,000,000 generations using a GTR+I+G substitution model with the first 3,000,000 generations being discarded as a burn-in.</p>
</text>
<file name="1471-2148-11-45-S2.txt">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<p>In total 14 trees showed congruent topologies. From the 14 eubacteria which have been used as an outgroup in these trees, we chose <it>Beggiatoa sp</it>. as an outgroup for further analyses because its 16S rRNA gene sequence exhibits the shortest distance to the cyanobacteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Phylogenetic analyses of a cyanobacterial subset</p>
</st>
<p>Phylogenetic analyses of 16S rRNA gene sequences from a subset of 58 cyanobacterial taxa were conducted using maximum likelihood (Additional File <supplr sid="S3">3</supplr>) and Bayesian inference (Figure <figr fid="F4">4</figr>). For taxa that diverged a long time ago, there is a possibility of sequence saturation, in which case further mutations would have no effect on the distance between sequences any more. We could significantly reject the possibility of sequence saturation for our alignment (Additional File <supplr sid="S4">4</supplr>).</p>
<suppl id="S3">
<title>
<p>Additional file 3</p>
</title>
<text>
<p>
<b>Maximum likelihood tree of cyanobacterial subset</b>. Maximum likelihood analysis of 16S rDNA sequences from 58 cyanobacteria, based on GTR+G+I substitution model, with <it>Beggiatoa sp</it>. as an outgroup. Posterior probabilities (&gt; 0.9) in black and bootstrap values (&gt; 50%) in red are shown at the nodes. Posterior probabilities were calculated from 265,858 trees inferred by Bayesian analysis. Bootstrap values were calculated from 500 re-samplings of the data set. Colors define groups: yellow are single-celled cyanobacteria of section I; orange single-celled from section II; green are multicellular, undifferentiated cyanobacteria from section III; blue are multicellular and differentiated bacteria from section IV; and pink from section V. Sections as described by Castenholz 2001 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. AC, B, C, E and E1 denote clades discussed in the text.</p>
</text>
<file name="1471-2148-11-45-S3.pdf">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<fig id="F4"><title><p>Figure 4</p></title><caption><p>Phylogenetic tree of a cyanobacterial subset</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Phylogenetic tree of a cyanobacterial subset</b>. Bayesian consensus cladogram of 16S rDNA sequences from 58 cyanobacterial strains, based on GTR+G+I substitution model, with <it>Beggiatoa sp</it>. used as outgroup. Posterior probabilities (> 0.9) are shown in black at nodes and bootstrap values (> 50%) in red. Posterior probabilities were calculated from 265,858 trees and bootstrap values from 500 re-samplings of the original data set. Colors define groups: yellow are single-celled cyanobacteria of section I; orange single-celled from section II; green are multicellular, undifferentiated cyanobacteria from section III; blue are multicellular and differentiated bacteria from section IV; and pink from section V. Sections as described by Castenholz 2001 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>. AC, B, C, E and E1 denote phylogenetic clades described in the text.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2148-11-45-4" hint_layout="double"/></fig>
<suppl id="S4">
<title>
<p>Additional file 4</p>
</title>
<text>
<p>
<b>Results from the test of substitutional saturation</b>. Substitutional saturation of the sequences was tested using DAMBE software. The index of substitutional saturation is smaller than the estimated critical value irrespective of the symmetry of the tree. The sequences are therefore not saturated.</p>
</text>
<file name="1471-2148-11-45-S4.pdf">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<p>A general substitution model (GTR+G+I) was applied for both analyses. Results of the maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods are highly congruent. Result of the Bayesian analysis with posterior probabilities (black) and bootstrap values (red) displayed at the nodes is pictured in Figure <figr fid="F4">4</figr>. Posterior probabilities above 0.95 and bootstrap values over 70% are considered to represent a high phylogenetic support. Bootstrap values between 50% and 70% are considered weak support. Posterior probabilities below 0.90 and bootstrap values below 50% are not displayed. At deep nodes, the tree topology is fully resolved with high posterior probabilities. Apart from section V, none of the morphological sections described by Castenholz <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp> is monophyletic. Compared to the outgroup <it>Beggiatoa sp</it>., branch lengths are relatively short, which seems surprising given the old age of the phylum. Rates of evolution in cyanobacteria are extremely slow. This so called "hypobradytelic" tempo would explain their short evolutionary distances <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
<abbr bid="B57">57</abbr>
<abbr bid="B58">58</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Cyanobacteria form three distinct clades mentioned earlier (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>). Clades E, AC and C exhibit posterior probabilities (PP)/bootstrap values (BV) of 1.0/51%, 0.99/-, and 1.0/97% respectively (no support: "-"). Clade E comprises all taxa analyzed from section II, some from section I (<it>Synechocystis</it>, <it>Microcystis, Gloeothece </it>and others), some from section III (<it>Oscillatoria, Trichodesmium, Arthrospira, Lyngbya, Microcoleus, Spirulina </it>and others) and all from sections IV and V. Within clade E two subclades, E1 (species from section II; PP/BV = 1.0/81%) and B (species from sections IV and V among others; PP/BV = 1.0/100%), are found. Clade AC contains species from section I and III (among others, species from the genera <it>Synechococcus, Prochlorococcus, Oscillatoria, Plectonema</it>). Clade C consists of <it>Pseudanabaena </it>species, <it>Arthronema gygaxiana </it>and <it>Phormidium mucicola </it>belonging to section III. <it>Gloeobacter violaceus </it>is placed closest to the outgroup. Several phylogenetic studies were conducted showing approximate agreement with the tree topology generated here <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
<abbr bid="B31">31</abbr>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
<abbr bid="B39">39</abbr>
<abbr bid="B54">54</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. To check the consistency of results from the maximum likelihood and Bayesian analysis to previous studies, we compare our results to the trees produced by Honda <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, Turner <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
</abbrgrp> who used 16S rDNA sequences, and Swingley <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
</abbrgrp> who used a genomic approach.</p>
<p>The tree from Figure 2 in Honda <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
</abbrgrp> shows overall strong congruences with our tree. The only exception is that in Honda <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
</abbrgrp> "<it>Synechococcus elongatus </it>Toray" is placed separately between <it>Gloeobacter </it>and the rest of the cyanobacteria. We found that "<it>Synechococcus elongatus </it>Toray" (identical to <it>Thermosynechococcus elongatus </it>BP1) is located within clade AC in our study and not next to <it>Gloeobacter violaceus</it>.</p>
<p>In Turner <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, the major clades are congruent with those inferred in our study, but there are a few differences in the relationships among these clades. In that study, the analog of clade E1 is sister to clade AC, which is not the case in our consensus tree. Furthermore, <it>Synechococcus </it>C9 is grouped with <it>Synechococcus </it>P1, which might be due to long branch attraction. In our phylogenetic tree, <it>Synechococcus </it>C9 is grouped within clade AC, a relationship supported by high posterior probabilities and bootstrap values (1.0/99%). Clade C in our study is placed in the same position as in the tree from Turner <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Swingley <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, used a phylogenomic approach to investigate cyanobacterial relationships. Due to limited, biased genome data available at present, some clades present in our tree are missing in that study. Even so, the main clades retrieved in that study are mostly congruent with clades in our tree.</p>
<p>Monophyly of section V (the branching, differentiated cyanobacteria) shown in our tree agrees with Turner <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and other studies <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
<abbr bid="B54">54</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Nonetheless it is possible that the monophyly of section V bacteria is due to limited taxon sampling, since polyphyly has been detected for section V in another study <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B59">59</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. <it>Gloeobacter violaceus </it>is placed as the first diverging lineage in the phylogeny after the outgroup, as suggested by previous studies <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
<abbr bid="B39">39</abbr>
<abbr bid="B54">54</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Our phylogenetic reconstruction also confirms the placement of taxa belonging to section I and III throughout the tree <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
<abbr bid="B31">31</abbr>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
<abbr bid="B39">39</abbr>
<abbr bid="B54">54</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The finding that possibly none of the traditional morphological sections are monophyletic, clearly indicates that similar morphologies have been gained and lost several times during the evolutionary history of living cyanobacteria. Overall, the strong phylogenetic agreement between this and earlier studies confirms the suitability of the tree presented here for further analyses of morphological evolution.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Ancestral character state reconstruction</p>
</st>
<p>Our analysis indicates that multicellularity is a phylogenetically conservative character (p-value &lt; 0.01). If the terminal taxa of the Bayesian consensus tree are randomly re-shuffled, a count through 1,000 re-shuffled trees gives an average of 20 transition steps. However an average of only nine parsimonious transitions was observed in a count through 10,000 randomly sampled trees of our ancestral character state reconstruction.</p>
<p>Results of the character state reconstruction using the AsymmMK model with transition rates estimated by Mesquite 2.71 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B60">60</abbr>
</abbrgrp> are displayed in Figure <figr fid="F5">5</figr>. Using maximum likelihood analysis, average frequencies of the characters were counted across 10,000 trees randomly sampled from the two Metropolis-coupled Markov Chain Monte Carlo (<it>MC</it>
<sup>3</sup>) searches of the Bayesian tree reconstruction.</p>
<fig id="F5"><title><p>Figure 5</p></title><caption><p>Ancestral character state reconstruction using maximum likelihood</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Ancestral character state reconstruction using maximum likelihood</b>. Ancestral character state reconstruction with maximum likelihood analysis, using the "Asymmetrical Markov k-state 2 parameter"(AsymmMk) model implemented in Mesquite 2.71 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B60">60</abbr></abbrgrp>. Transition rates were estimated by the program (Table 2). Analysis was run over 10,000 randomly sampled trees from the Bayesian analysis and plotted on the Bayesian consensus tree. Possible states are unicellular (yellow) and multicellular (black). Relative likelihood probabilities for each character state are represented with a pie chart at nodes. The white part in the pie charts indicates the fraction of trees where the node was absent. Posterior probabilities (black) and bootstrap values (red) from the phylogenetic analyses are displayed at the nodes. Asterisks denote supported nodes for which posterior probabilities and bootstrap values are presented in Figure 4. At nodes 3, 4 and 5 a multicellular ancestry is very likely. Back mutations to unicellularity occur at least five times. A back mutation to multicellularity occurs at least once. Clades where transitions occurred are labelled.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2148-11-45-5" hint_layout="double"/></fig>
<p>Cyanobacteria share a unicellular ancestor, but multicellularity evolved early in the cyanobacterial lineage. We identified multicellular character states for three basic ancestors leading to clades E, AC and C in our tree. Together, these clades encompass the entirety of the morphological sections II, III, IV and V. Additionally character states were reconstructed using maximum likelihood analysis and fixed transition rates to analyze properties of the data set. Transition rates are presented in Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>. Probabilities for character states at nodes 3, 4 and 5 were examined in detail (Table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr>). A multicellular ancestry is very likely for these three nodes. For node 3 the relative probabilities of a multicellular ancestor range from 0.79 to 1.00, depending on the probability of the transition rates. For node 4 with varying transition rates, the relative probabilities of a multicellular ancestor range from 0.83 to 1.00. For node 5 the probabilities for multicellularity range from 0.90 to 1.00.</p>
<tbl id="T2"><title><p>Table 2</p></title><caption><p>Different Transition rates with whom ancestral character states were estimated.</p></caption><tblbdy cols="10">
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>method rates</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="8" ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Maximum likelihood analysis</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Bayesian analysis</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c cspan="8">
            <hr/>
         </c>
         <c cspan="1">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>AsymmMK<sup>1</sup></b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>MK1<sup>2</sup></b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>F1<sup>3</sup></b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>F2</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>F3</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>F4</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>F5</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>F6</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>rjhp<sup>4</sup></b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="10">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>fw</b>
               <sup>5</sup>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.62</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.67</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.90</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.70</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>5.40</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.45</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.90</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.70</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.881</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>bw</b>
               <sup>6</sup>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.99</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.67</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.70</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.90</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.45</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>5.40</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.90</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.70</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.873</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p><sup>1</sup>Asymmetrical Markov k-state 2 parameter model; rates estimated from the consensus tree</p>
      <p><sup>2</sup>Markov k-state 1 parameter model; rates estimated from the consensus tree</p>
      <p><sup>3</sup>F1-F6: Models using different fixed transition rates</p>
      <p><sup>4</sup>reversible jump for model selection, using a hyper prior</p>
      <p><sup>5</sup>forward rate describing changes to multicellularity</p>
      <p><sup>6</sup>backward rate describing changes back to a unicellular state</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<tbl id="T3"><title><p>Table 3</p></title><caption><p>Ancestral character states of nodes 3, 4 and 5 using different transition rates and methods.</p></caption><tblbdy cols="9">
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>node 3</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>node 4</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>node 5</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2">
            <hr/>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2">
            <hr/>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>method</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>model</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>state1</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>state0</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>state1</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>state0</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>state1</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>state0</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="9">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>ML</b>
               <sup>1</sup>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>AsymmMK</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>estimated<sup>3</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.88</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.12</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.91</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.08</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.95</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.05</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>F1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.96</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.04</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.98</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.02</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.99</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.01</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>F2</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.87</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.12</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.91</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.09</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.94</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.06</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>F3</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.00</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.00</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.00</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.00</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.00</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.00</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>F4</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.88</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.12</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.92</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.08</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.95</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.05</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c cspan="8">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>MK1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>estimated<sup>3</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.79</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.21</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.83</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.17</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.90</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.10</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>F5</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.88</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.12</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.90</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.10</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.93</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.07</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>F6</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.79</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.21</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.83</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.17</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.90</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.10</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="9">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>MP</b>
               <sup>2</sup>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.6805</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.0013</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.6799</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.0014</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.6871</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.0014</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="9">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>BA</b>
               <sup>3</sup>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>rjhp</p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.915</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.0851</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.817</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.183</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.902</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.0980</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p><sup>1</sup>Maximum likelihood: Average frequencies across trees were calculated</p>
      <p><sup>2</sup>Maximum parsimony: Uniquely best states across trees were counted</p>
      <p><sup>3</sup>Bayesian analysis: model parameters estimated based on the data</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<p>The maximum likelihood analysis is not contradicted by a Maximum Parsimony optimization (Table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr> and Additional File <supplr sid="S5">5</supplr>). Applying maximum parsimony as a reconstruction method, the uniquely best states were counted across 10,000 trees randomly sampled from the two (<it>MC</it>
<sup>3</sup>) runs of the Bayesian tree reconstruction. The relative probabilities for a multicellular ancestor at nodes 3, 4 and 5 are 0.68, 0.68 and 0.69, respectively. In contrast, the relative probabilities for a unicellular ancestor at nodes 3, 4 and 5 under parsimony reconstruction are 0.0013, 0.0014 and 0.0014, respectively.</p>
<suppl id="S5">
<title>
<p>Additional file 5</p>
</title>
<text>
<p>
<b>Ancestral character state reconstruction using maximum parsimony</b>. Summary of results over 10,000 randomly sampled trees from the Bayesian analysis. Uniquely best states were counted and are shown on the Bayesian consensus tree. Possible states are unicellular (yellow) and multicellular (black). At the nodes, probabilities for each character state are represented with a pie chart. The white part in the pie charts indicates fraction of trees where the node was absent, grey parts describe fraction of trees where both states were equally likely. Nodes where transitions occurred were labelled with an asterisk if they show strong support from the phylogenetic analyses. The maximum parsimony analysis produced a similar result compared to the maximum likelihood analysis. A unicellular ancestry for the most recent common ancestor of all cyanobacteria is supported. Nodes 3, 4 and 5 are most frequently optimized as multicellular. Multicellularity has been estimated for nodes 3 and 4 in 6800 trees and for node 5 in 6900 trees. In contrast, single celled states for these nodes have been reported, for node 3 in 13 out of 10,000 trees and for node 4 and 5 in 14 out of 10,000 trees. Five reversals to unicellularity can be detected and at least one reversal to multicellularity.</p>
</text>
<file name="1471-2148-11-45-S5.pdf">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<p>Using Bayesian methods, a similar pattern is observed for these nodes. As an evolutionary model, BayesFactors revealed that a "hyperprior" approach with exponential prior distributions, whose means were sampled from a uniform distribution between 0 and 10 gave the best fit. Transition rates were estimated to be almost equal. Figure <figr fid="F6">6</figr> displays the posterior probability distributions of character states at these three nodes as they were estimated over 10,000 randomly sampled trees. At nodes 3 and 5 posterior probabilities of a multicellular character state display values above 0.90 for most of the trees. At node 4 a multicellular state is more likely as well. Posterior probabilities at node 4 are above 0.75 for most of the trees.</p>
<fig id="F6"><title><p>Figure 6</p></title><caption><p>Ancestral character states of nodes 3, 4 and 5 using Bayesian analysis</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Ancestral character states of nodes 3, 4 and 5 using Bayesian analysis</b>. Posterior probability distribution for a unicellular character state (yellow) and a multicellular character state (black) at nodes 3, 4 and 5 from 10,000 Bayesian trees. 2&#215; 5,000 trees were randomly sampled from 2 <it>MC</it><sup>3</sup>-searches. Analysis was performed using BayesTraits. Posterior distributions were derived from reversible jump MCMC-search of 30 million iterations using a hyperprior approach. The probability of a multicellular ancestry is shifted towards 1 for each of the three nodes.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2148-11-45-6" hint_layout="single"/></fig>
<p>At least five reversals to unicellularity occurred in the tree, three of them within clade AC. The first transition occurred on a branch which led to a group of thermophilic cyanobacteria: <it>Acharyochloris sp</it>., <it>Synechococcus lividus </it>C1 and <it>Thermosynechococcus elongatus</it>. Posterior probabilities (PP) and bootstrap values (BV) for this group are 0.99/73%, whereas the sister group within AC is supported by 0.96/66% (PP/BV). The second transition within clade AC led also to a thermophilic cyanobacterium <it>Synechococcus </it>C9. Sister relation of this species to a filamentous thermophilic cyanobacterium is supported by 1.0/99% (PP/BV). The last transition in clade AC occurred within the group including the marine pico-phytoplankton genera <it>Synechococcus </it>and <it>Prochlorococcus</it>. The filamentous <it>Prochlorothrix hollandica </it>is supposed to be the closest relative to the group that includes marine pico-phytoplankton, supported by 1.0/61% (PP/BV). Clade AC has a PP of 0.99, while its BV is below 50%. Although bootstrap support is below 70% for clade AC and some groups within it, posterior probabilities show a very high support (&gt; 0.95). Simulation studies have shown that posterior probabilities approach the actual probability of a clade <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B61">61</abbr>
<abbr bid="B62">62</abbr>
<abbr bid="B63">63</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Bootstrapping tends to underestimate the actual probability of a true clade. Although, posterior probabilities tend to be erroneous if the model of evolution is underparameterized, overparameterization has only a minor effect on the posterior probabilities. Therefore, using a complex model of evolution, such as the "general time reversible with <it>gamma </it>distributed rate variation"(GTR+G), is recommended <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B62">62</abbr>
<abbr bid="B63">63</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. We used the GTR+G+I model for our analysis, and assume that nodes with a PP higher than 0.95 are reliable.</p>
<p>It is very likely that at least one additional reversal to unicellularity occurred in clade E1, but phylogenetic support is not high enough to locate the exact position of this transition. Similarly, support for the nodes where the other transition to multicellularity within clade E occurred is missing. The exact locations of reversals within clade E therefore are not certain and a scenario where multiple reversals occurred cannot be excluded. In clade E, there is also a reversal to multicellularity observed in <it>Spirulina sp</it>. PCC 6313. The location of this transition is supported by posterior probabilities of 0.99 at two ancestral nodes.</p>
<p>Stucken <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B64">64</abbr>
</abbrgrp> compared gene sets of multicellular cyanobacteria and found that at least 10 genes are essential for the formation of filaments. Besides genes previously thought to be correlated with heterocyst formation (<it>hetR</it>, <it>patU3 </it>and <it>hetZ</it>) they found seven genes coding for hypothetical proteins. The species they compare are all located within clade E in our tree, most of them being differentiated. Unfortunately no genomes from multicellular species in more basal clades are available at present. But genome projects of <it>Phormidium sp</it>. ISC 31 and <it>Plectonema sp</it>. ISC 33 are presently being conducted <url>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/lproks.cgi</url>. If these species turn out to group with <it>Phormidium </it>
<it>mucicola </it>IAM M-221 and <it>Plectonema sp</it>. F3 from the basal clades C and AC in our study, this could provide important information on the original metabolic pathways in ancient multicellular cyanobacteria and on possible advantages of multicellularity.</p>
<p>The majority of cyanobacteria living today are described as successful ecological generalists growing under diverse conditions <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Our analysis indicates that this diverse range of cyanobacterial morphotypes found in various habitats today &#8212;whether multicellular or unicellular&#8212; has evolved from multicellular ancestors.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Gaining and losing multicellularity</p>
</st>
<p>In eukaryotes, simple multicellular forms build the foundation for the evolution of complex multicellular organisms. Although complex multicellularity exhibiting more than three cell types is presumably missing in prokaryotes, bacteria invented simple multicellular forms possibly more than 1.5 billion years earlier than eukaryotes <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
<abbr bid="B65">65</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Multicellularity has been described as one of several major transitions that occurred in the history of life. These transitions between different units of selection <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B66">66</abbr>
</abbrgrp> resulted in changes in the organizational confines of the individual. Maynard Smith and Szathmary <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B67">67</abbr>
</abbrgrp>(1995, p.6) summarize eight major transitions in the evolution of life after which, "entities that were capable of independent replication before the transition can replicate only as part of a larger whole after it". These transitions can create new units of selection at a higher level of complexity <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B68">68</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Origin of chromosomes, origin of the eukaryotic cell, origin of multicellular organisms and the origin of eusocial communities are some major transitions that redefine the degree of individuality <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B66">66</abbr>
<abbr bid="B67">67</abbr>
<abbr bid="B69">69</abbr>
<abbr bid="B70">70</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Some transitions are thought to be unique, such as the evolution of meiosis or the evolution of the genetic code. Other major transitions occurred several times independently, such as the evolution of eusociality <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B71">71</abbr>
<abbr bid="B72">72</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and multicellularity <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
<abbr bid="B66">66</abbr>
<abbr bid="B73">73</abbr>
<abbr bid="B74">74</abbr>
<abbr bid="B75">75</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. There is a tendency to assume that these transitions occur in a progression that leads to an increase in complexity. However, it seems that in cyanobacteria this is not the case. Anatomical complexity has been lost during their evolution several times (Figure <figr fid="F5">5</figr>). In a similar fashion, a complex character such as eusociality has been lost several times in halictid bees <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B72">72</abbr>
<abbr bid="B76">76</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Conversely the phylogeny indicates that multicellularity re-evolved in <it>Spirulina</it>. Regaining complex characters has been observed in other studies as well <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B77">77</abbr>
<abbr bid="B78">78</abbr>
<abbr bid="B79">79</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Nonetheless, some studies state that re-evolution of a complex character after a previous loss is not possible <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B80">80</abbr>
<abbr bid="B81">81</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Such studies argue that according to 'Dollo's law', a loss of complexity is irreversible <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B82">82</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, a statement that is not supported in the cyanobacterial case. Repeated transitions in either direction are possible.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Prokaryotic fossil record before the "Great Oxygenation Event": Evidence for multicellular cyanobacteria?</p>
</st>
<p>Various claims for life during the early Archean Eon, more than 3.00 billion years ago exist. Most of them from two regions: the Berberton Greenstone Belt, South Africa (around 3.20-3.50 billion years old) and the Pilbara Craton, Western Australia (around 2.90-3.60 billion years old). For some of these "fossils" a biological origin is questioned <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
<abbr bid="B83">83</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, but for others biogenicity is very likely <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
<abbr bid="B84">84</abbr>
<abbr bid="B85">85</abbr>
<abbr bid="B86">86</abbr>
<abbr bid="B87">87</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. These candidates for early life have clear age constraints and there is no non-biological explanation for these structures. The ages and possible metabolic features of seven fossils of proposed biological origin are plotted in Figure <figr fid="F7">7</figr> (1-7) <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
<abbr bid="B84">84</abbr>
<abbr bid="B85">85</abbr>
<abbr bid="B86">86</abbr>
<abbr bid="B87">87</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Some of these fossils are assumed to have been photosynthetic and mat builders, characteristics that can be identified in cyanobacteria as well. One of the oldest fossils recorded, 3.45 billion year old prokaryotic remains found in the Panorama Formation, East Pilbara Craton, Western Australia exhibit a filamentous morphotype and possibly carried out anoxygenic photosynthesis <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<fig id="F7"><title><p>Figure 7</p></title><caption><p>Timeline with prokaryotic fossil record</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Timeline with prokaryotic fossil record</b>. Timeline with geological events (A) and prokaryotic fossil record (B). (A) Formation of Earth <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B118">118</abbr></abbrgrp>, first evidence of continental crust <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B119">119</abbr></abbrgrp>, formation of continents <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B118">118</abbr></abbrgrp>, and glaciation events described in the Snowball Earth hypothesis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B120">120</abbr></abbrgrp>. (B) The oldest conclusive cyanobacterial fossils are found in around 2.15 billion year old rocks. 1-7: Fossils from the Archean Eon <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr><abbr bid="B84">84</abbr><abbr bid="B85">85</abbr><abbr bid="B86">86</abbr><abbr bid="B87">87</abbr></abbrgrp>. 8: chroococcacean fossils <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr></abbrgrp>; 9: oscillatorian fossils <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr></abbrgrp>. I-V: cyanobacterial fossils <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp>. 10: eukaryotic fossils <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B65">65</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2148-11-45-7" hint_layout="double"/></fig>
<p>Some late Archean fossils show an oscillatorian or chroococcacean morphotype (Figure <figr fid="F7">7</figr>: 8, 9). 2.52 and 2.56 billion year old oscillatorian-like fossils <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
<abbr bid="B88">88</abbr>
<abbr bid="B89">89</abbr>
</abbrgrp> could possibly represent close relatives of cyanobacterial ancestors. 2.72 billion year old filamentous bacteria <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
</abbrgrp> could potentially represent one of the first multicellular cyanobacteria detected. For single celled forms, 2.56 billion year old unicellular fossils <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B89">89</abbr>
<abbr bid="B90">90</abbr>
<abbr bid="B91">91</abbr>
<abbr bid="B92">92</abbr>
</abbrgrp> could likely represent chroococcacean fossils, relatives of ancestral <it>Gloeobacter violaceus </it>or <it>Synechococcus sp</it>. P1 (Figure <figr fid="F7">7</figr>).</p>
<p>The first conclusive cyanobacterial fossils from all five sections have been reported from around 2.15 billion year old rocks. In 1976, Hofmann described Microfossils from stromatolitic dolomite stones in the Kasegalik and McLeary Formations of the Belcher Supergroup in Hudson Bay, Northern Canada. Among these fossils are <it>Halythrix </it>which seems to belong to the order Oscillatoriales (section III), <it>Eosynechococcus </it>and <it>Entophysalis </it>both presumably order Chroococcales (section I) and <it>Myxococcoides </it>fossils (section II). In 1997 similar fossils were described by Amard and Bertrand-Safarti in paleoproterozoic cherty stromatolites from the "Formation C (FC)" of the Franceville Group in Gabon, dating back 2.00 billion years. They also characterized chroococcalean fossils, particularly <it>Eosynechococcus </it>and <it>Tetraphycus</it>, and filamentous bacteria (<it>Gunflinta</it>) which could likely resemble cyanobacteria and <it>Myxococcoides </it>fossils. Furthermore, large microfossils (so called <it>Archaeoellipsoides elongatus</it>), with akinetes similar to the ones from Anabaena-like species were found <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Akinetes are resting cells which are only present in differentiated cyanobacteria from sections IV and V. As it has been confirmed in several studies, sections IV and V share a most recent common ancestor <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Therefore these fossil akinetes document the existence of differentiated cyanobacteria 2.00 billion years ago. Given that differentiation in cyanobacteria is evolutionary stable only in a multicellular setting <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B93">93</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, this again supports the notion that multicellular species belonging to the cyanobacteria must have existed earlier than 2.0 billion years ago.</p>
<p>Several studies have assessed prokaryotic history using phylogenetic dating methods <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B50">50</abbr>
<abbr bid="B52">52</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In these studies the origin of cyanobacteria has been estimated around the time of the "Great Oxygenation Event" of 2.20-2.45 billion years ago <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Other studies have reported elevations of oxygen levels before the great rise of atmospheric oxygen <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
<abbr bid="B94">94</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Using small and large ribosomal subunit sequences, Blank and Sanchez-Baracaldo <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B39">39</abbr>
</abbrgrp> estimated the origin of cyanobacteria between 2.7 and 3.1 billion years ago. They also try to address the evolution of cyanobacterial traits and assess that multicellular cyanobacteria did not originate before 2.29-2.49 billion years ago. In the study of Blank and Sanchez-Baracaldo <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B39">39</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, a smaller set of cyanobacterial taxa was used, with some basal multicellular species that are present in clade C of our analysis missing. These taxa could have an essential effect on the timing of the first multicellular cyanobacteria. To resolve this issue further dating analyses would be needed. Clearly, as Blank and Sanchez-Baracaldo point out, for such analyses to ultimately resolve the cyanobacterial history, a larger number of cyanobacterial genome data would be needed to represent all the morphological and genetic diversity within this phylum.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusions</p>
</st>
<p>Cyanobacteria, photosynthetic prokaryotes, are one of the oldest phyla still alive on this planet. Approximately 2.20-2.45 billion years ago cyanobacteria raised the atmospheric oxygen level and established the basis for the evolution of aerobic respiration <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. They introduced a dramatic change in the Earth's atmosphere, which might have created possibilities for more complex lifeforms to evolve. Considering the importance of cyanobacteria for the evolution of life, it seems unfortunate that data sets for a representative phylogenomic analysis are not yet available. A coordinated perspective between research groups and a diversified taxon sampling strategy for genome projects would offer the possibility for more comprehensive studies on cyanobacterial evolution. By presenting results obtained from 16S rDNA data analysis here, we hope to boost interest for more extensive genomic studies in this phylum. Phylogenomic approaches would help to further investigate some of the results in the present work.</p>
<p>Multicellular prokaryotic fossils from the Archean Eon are documented <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, and fossil data can support the possibility of multicellular cyanobacteria in the Archean Eon <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
<abbr bid="B88">88</abbr>
<abbr bid="B89">89</abbr>
<abbr bid="B90">90</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Furthermore, studies describe smaller accumulations of oxygen levels around 2.8 to 2.6 billion years ago <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and around 2.5 billion years ago <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B94">94</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Therefore multicellular cyanobacteria could have evolved before the rise of oxygen in the atmosphere. The "Great Oxygenation Event", also referred to as "oxygen crisis", could presumably have marked one of the first mass extinction events during Earth's history. New habitats developing around 2.32 billion years ago, due to a dramatic change of Earth's atmosphere could have triggered cyanobacteria to evolve the variety of morphotypes preserved until today.</p>
<p>In terms of cell types, cyanobacteria reached their maximum morphological complexity around 2.00 billion years ago <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B95">95</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. By the time eukaryotes evolved, cyanobacteria already exhibited the full range of their morphological diversity. Due to slow evolutionary rates in cyanobacteria, which have been described as "hypobradytelic" <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
<abbr bid="B57">57</abbr>
<abbr bid="B58">58</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, extant cyanobacteria that appear to exhibit the same morphotype as in the Precambrian Eon <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B96">96</abbr>
</abbrgrp> are reminiscent of the idea of "living fossils". However, one should consider the possibility that what may appear as morphological stasis may be due to developmental constraints at the phylum level. Cyanobacteria apparently reached their maximum complexity early in Earth history, but instead of morphological stasis at the species level, our results suggest that they subsequently changed morphotypes several times during their evolution. This allowed for the exploration of diverse morphotypes within their developmental constraints, including the loss and regaining of multicellular growth forms.</p>
<p>Figure <figr fid="F8">8</figr> summarizes the morphological evolution of the cyanobacteria inferred in this study. All extant cyanobacteria share a most recent common ancestor that was unicellular. Single-celled species at the base of the tree do not seem to have changed much in their morphology and are possibly comparable to ancient cyanobacteria. Aside from <it>Gloeobacter violaceus </it>and <it>Synechococcus </it>P1, which diverged very early, all cyanobacteria living today share multicellular ancestors. Although complex multicellularity is missing in prokaryotes, these simple multicellular forms have evolved several hundred million years before the appearance of eukaryotes, whose fossil record dates back to 1.8-1.3 billion years ago <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B65">65</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In agreement with various proposed selective advantages that multicellular growth could confer <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B97">97</abbr>
<abbr bid="B98">98</abbr>
<abbr bid="B99">99</abbr>
<abbr bid="B100">100</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, the results presented here indicate that the early origin of multicellularity played a key role in the evolutionary radiation that has led to the majority of extant cyanobacteria on the planet.</p>
<fig id="F8"><title><p>Figure 8</p></title><caption><p>Schematic illustration of cyanobacterial evolution</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Schematic illustration of cyanobacterial evolution</b>. Numbers at the nodes indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (black) and bootstrap values (red) from the phylogenetic analyses. The most recent common ancestor of all cyanobacteria is optimized to have been unicellular. All cyanobacteria derive from a unicellular most recent common ancestor (node 1). The lineage leading to <it>Gloeobacter violaceus </it>diverges very early from the remaining cyanobacteria. Most major clades of cyanobacteria derive from multicellular ancestors (nodes 3-5).</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2148-11-45-8" hint_layout="double"/></fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Methods</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Taxon sampling</p>
</st>
<p>A total of 2,065 16S rRNA gene sequences from the phylum cyanobacteria were downloaded from GenBank. Unidentified and uncultured species were excluded. With this large dataset phylogenetic reconstructions were conducted as described in the next section. Aside from cyanobacteria, the dataset included six chloroplast sequences and six eubacterial sequences: <it>Beggiatoa sp</it>., <it>Thiobacillus prosperus</it>, <it>Agrobacterium tumefaciens</it>, <it>Chlorobium sp</it>., <it>Candidatus Chlorothrix halophila </it>and <it>Escherichia coli HS</it>.</p>
<p>From this large tree a subset of 58 cyanobacterial sequences were selected for further analyses. Accession numbers are provided in Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>. Species from all five sections described by Castenholz <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp> were included. Taxa were chosen to represent a 1:1 ratio of unicellular and multicellular species. The final data set contained 22 single-celled taxa from section I, 7 single-celled taxa from section II, 21 multicellular taxa from section III, 5 multicellular, differentiated taxa from section IV and 3 differentiated, branching taxa from section V as described by Castenholz <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>An outgroup for further analyses was chosen from a set of eubacterial, non-cyanobacterial species whose 16S rRNA gene sequences were downloaded from GenBank (Table <tblr tid="T4">4</tblr>). Species were sampled to cover a wide range of different phyla. Aside a set of species from phyla represented in the "tree of life" <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B51">51</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, species from additional phyla as described on NCBI <url>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/</url> - Taxonomy Browser: Bacteria) were selected for analyses.</p>
<tbl id="T4"><title><p>Table 4</p></title><caption><p>Non-cyanobacterial species used in this study with GenBank accession numbers for 16S rDNA sequences</p></caption><tblbdy cols="4">
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Phyla<sup>1</sup></b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>species</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <b>accession numbers</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>EUBACTERIA</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Acidobacteria</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Acidobacterium capsulatum </it>ATCC 51196</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="CP001472">CP001472</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Actinobacteria</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Actinosynnema mirum </it>DSM 43827</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="CP001630">CP001630</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Aquificae</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Aquifex aeolicus </it>VF5</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="NC_000918">NC_000918</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Bacteroidetes</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Bacteroidetes bacterium </it>X3-d</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="HM212417">HM212417</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Chlamydiae/Verrucomicrobia</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <it>Chlamydia trachomatis</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AM884176">AM884176</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Chlamydiae/Verrucomicrobia</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Verrucomicrobia bacterium </it>YC6886</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="FJ032193">FJ032193</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Chlorobi</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Chlorobium sp</it>. sy9</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="EU770420">EU770420</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Chloroflexi</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Chloroflexus sp</it>. Y-400-fl</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="NC_012032">NC_012032</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Chrysiogenetes</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <it>Chrysiogenes arsenatis</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="NR_029283">NR_029283</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Deferribacteres</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Deferribacter desulfuricans </it>SSM1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AP011529">AP011529</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Deinococcus-Thermus</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Deinococcus sp</it>. AA63</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ585986">AJ585986</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Dictyoglomi</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <it>Dictyoglomus turgidum</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="NC_011661">NC_011661</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Fibrobacteres</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <it>Fibrobacter succinogenes</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="NC_013410">NC_013410</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Firmicutes</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Streptococcus mutans </it>NN2025</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AP010655">AP010655</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Fusobacteria</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <it>Fusobacterium nucleatum</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="GU561358">GU561358</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Gemmatimonadetes</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Gemmatimonas sp</it>.</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="GU557153">GU557153</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Nitrospirae</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <it>Nitrospira calida</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="HM485589">HM485589</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Planctomycetes</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Planctomyces brasiliensis </it>DSM 5305</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="NZ_AEIC01000055">NZ_AEIC01000055</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Proteobacteria</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Beggiatoa sp</it>. 'Chiprana'</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="EF428583">EF428583</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Spirochaetes</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Spirochaeta thermophila </it>DSM 6192</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="NC_014484">NC_014484</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Thermodesulfobacteria</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <it>Thermodesulfobacterium hydrogeniphilum</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AF332514">AF332514</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Thermotogae</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Thermotoga lettingae </it>TMO</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="NC_009828">NC_009828</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>ARCHAEA</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Nanoarchaeota</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p><it>Nanoarchaeum equitans </it>Kin4-M,</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="right">
            <p>
               <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="NC_005213">NC_005213</ext-link>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p><sup>1</sup>taxonomy as described at <url>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/</url> and <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B51">51</abbr></abbrgrp></p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Phylogenetic analyses</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Phylogenetic analyses of all identified cyanobacteria</p>
</st>
<p>The 2,065 16S rRNA gene sequences were aligned using the software MAFFT <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B101">101</abbr>
</abbrgrp> via Cipres Portal <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B102">102</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The alignment was corrected manually using BioEdit v7.0.5 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B103">103</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Poorly aligned and duplicated sequences were excluded from the alignment. From the remaining 1,254 sequences (1235 characters) a phylogenetic tree was reconstructed running 10 maximum likelihood analyses as implemented in RAxML v7.0.4 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B104">104</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. GTR + G + I (General time reversible model, G: Gamma correction, I: proportion of invariable sites) <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B105">105</abbr>
<abbr bid="B106">106</abbr>
</abbrgrp> was used as an evolutionary substitution model. Bootstrap values were calculated from 100 re-samplings of the dataset and plotted on the best maximum likelihood tree using RAxML v7.0.4. The resultant tree (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>; Additional File <supplr sid="S6">6</supplr>: newick format; Additional File <supplr sid="S7">7</supplr>: taxon names) was visualised in FigTree v1.3.1 <url>http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/</url> and graphically edited with Adobe Illustrator CS2 <url>http://www.adobe.com/products/illustrator/</url>.</p>
<suppl id="S6">
<title>
<p>Additional file 6</p>
</title>
<text>
<p>
<b>Phylogenetic tree of cyanobacteria - newick format</b>. Phylogenetic tree of 1,254 cyanobacterial sequences including six chloroplasts and six Eubacteria analyzed using maximum likelihood analysis with a GTR+G+I estimated substitution model, conducted with the software RAxML.</p>
</text>
<file name="1471-2148-11-45-S6.txt">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<suppl id="S7">
<title>
<p>Additional file 7</p>
</title>
<text>
<p>
<b>Taxon names of the phylogenetic tree of cyanobacteria</b>. Species names used in the phylogenetic analysis conducted with RAxML software. Taxon names are ordered by sub-groups as in Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>.</p>
</text>
<file name="1471-2148-11-45-S7.pdf">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Phylogenetic analyses to identify an outgroup</p>
</st>
<p>To test different outgroups, phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using all sampled non-cyanobacterial species (Table <tblr tid="T4">4</tblr>) plus five representative species from the cyanobacterial phylum (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). Sequences were aligned using Clustal-X with default settings <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B107">107</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and corrected manually. The trees were built using maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference, with and without an outgroup from the kingdom archaea. Fifty separate maximum likelihood searches were conducted using RAxML v7.0.4 software <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B104">104</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, from which the tree with the best log-likelihood was chosen. Bootstrap support for each tree was gathered from 100 re-samplings. Bayesian analyses were conducted with M<smcaps>R</smcaps>B<smcaps>AYES</smcaps> 3.1 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B108">108</abbr>
</abbrgrp> using a GTR + G + I evolutionary model with substitution rates, base frequencies, invariable sites and the shape parameter of the gamma distribution estimated by the program. Two Metropolis-coupled Markov Chain Monte Carlo (<it>MC</it>
<sup>3</sup>) searches with four chains, three heated and a cold one, were run. The analyses started with a random tree and was run for 5,000,000 generations. Trees and parameters were sampled every 100th generation. The trees were checked to show a standard deviation of split frequencies below 0.05. The first 3,000,000 generations were excluded as the burn-in.</p>
<p>Additionally phylogenetic analyses were conducted with Bayesian inference, using each of the 22 eubacterial species separately with the sampled cyanobacterial subset (58 taxa). Alignments were built using Clustal-X software with default settings <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B107">107</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and corrected manually. For each phylogenetic analysis two (<it>MC</it>
<sup>3</sup>) searches were run for 10,000,000 generations using M<smcaps>R</smcaps>B<smcaps>AYES</smcaps> 3.1 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B108">108</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Trees and parameters were sampled every 100th generation. The first 3,000,000 generations being excluded as a burn-in, assuring that the standard deviation of split frequencies were below 0.05 and log-likelihoods of the trees had reached stationarity. Results were compared and <it>Beggiatoa sp</it>. was chosen as an outgroup for further analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Phylogenetic analyses of a cyanobacterial subset</p>
</st>
<p>Sequence alignments of the 16S rRNA gene sequences from the cyanobacterial subset and <it>Beggiatoa sp</it>. (59 taxa, 1166 characters) were carried out using Clustal-X with default settings <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B107">107</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and corrected manually. Whether the cyanobacterial alignment (excluding the outgroup) was substitutionally saturated was tested using the program DAMBE <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B109">109</abbr>
<abbr bid="B110">110</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The information-entropy based index of substitutional saturation <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B111">111</abbr>
</abbrgrp> was used to analyze our alignment of 16S rRNA gene sequences. The test performs only on a maximum of 32 species. Therefore we sampled from our phylogeny 32 representative sequences that span the whole tree, and performed the test introduced by Xia et al. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B111">111</abbr>
</abbrgrp>(Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr> and Additional File <supplr sid="S4">4</supplr>).</p>
<p>Phylogenetic reconstruction was carried out using Bayesian analysis and maximum likelihood. Maximum likelihood analysis was performed using GARLI 0.96 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B112">112</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and Bayesian analysis was conducted with M<smcaps>R</smcaps>B<smcaps>AYES</smcaps> 3.1 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B108">108</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The evolutionary model of nucleotide substitution that best fitted the data was obtained by using the Akaike Information Criterion as implemented in Modeltest 3.5 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B113">113</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The selected model was GTR + G + I. Substitution rates, base frequencies, invariable sites and the shape parameter of the gamma distribution were estimated by the program. Fifty maximum likelihood searches were performed. Bootstrap values were calculated from 500 re-samplings of the data set. The bootstrap values were plotted on the best ML-tree using the program SumTrees <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B114">114</abbr>
</abbrgrp> (Additional File <supplr sid="S3">3</supplr>).</p>
<p>Bayesian analysis was conducted running two (<it>MC</it>
<sup>3</sup>) searches, each with four chains, one cold and three heated. Starting with a random tree, analyses were run for 16,616,000 generations each, with trees being sampled every 100th generation. The trees were checked for convergence of parameters (standard deviation of split frequencies below 0.01, effective sample sizes above 200, potential scale reduction factor equal to 1.0) using Tracer v1.4.1 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B115">115</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and the program AWTY <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B116">116</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Burn-in was set to 3,323,200 generations each, corresponding to the first 20% of the analyses. The average standard deviation of split frequencies was below 0.01 for the remaining 132,929 trees of each run, indicating that steady state of the log-likelihoods was reached.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Ancestral character state reconstruction</p>
</st>
<p>Character state reconstructions were performed using maximum parsimony (MP; Additional File <supplr sid="S5">5</supplr>) and maximum likelihood criteria as implemented in Mesquite 2.71 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B60">60</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. 5,000 trees from each <it>MC</it>
<sup>3 </sup>run were randomly chosen from the post burn-in Bayesian sample and combined. Discrete characters were coded into multicellular or unicellular states. The results over 10,000 Bayesian trees were summarized and displayed on the consensus tree of the Bayesian analysis. For maximum likelihood estimates, both the "Markov k-state 1 parameter model" (MK1 model) and "Asymmetrical Markov k-state 2 parameter model" (AsymmMK model) were applied. Rate of change is the only parameter in the MK1 model. The AsymmMK model exhibits two parameters, describing the forward and backward transitions between states. Phylogenetic conservativeness of multicellularity was tested by comparing the observed distribution of parsimony steps across 10,000 randomly chosen trees from the Bayesian analysis against the distribution from 1,000 trees modified from the Bayesian consensus by randomly shuffling the terminal taxa, while keeping the relative proportion of states unaltered. The root was assumed to be at equilibrium. Transition rates for the MK1 and AsymmMK model were estimated by the program. Rates for the latter models presented in Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr> were estimated for the consensus tree. To explore properties of the data set, character states were additionally reconstructed with manually fixed transition rates (F1-F6; Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>). The state of the outgroup was excluded from the analyses to avoid biased inferences within the ingroup.</p>
<p>The character states of nodes 3, 4 and 5 of the Bayesian consensus tree were additionally estimated using a reversible jump MCMC search as implemented in BayesTraits <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B117">117</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. MCMC was run for 30 million iterations, and a burnin set to 50,000. The analysis was run several times with parameters of the evolutionary model being chosen from different prior distributions. In order to determine which model offered the best fitting priors, models were tested using Bayes Factors. A hyperprior approach with mean-values of the exponential priors derived from a uniform distribution between 0 to 10 was determined to fit best the data. The results of the analysis were visualized in Tracer v1.5 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B115">115</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Authors' contributions</p>
</st>
<p>BES and HCB conceived the study; BES gathered data and conducted analyses; BES, HCB, AA designed research and wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
</sec>
</bdy><bm>
<ack>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Acknowledgements</p>
</st>
<p>We would like to thank Elena Conti, Brian R. Moore and Jurriaan M.de Vos for helpful comments on an earlier version of our manuscript. Furthermore, we would like to thank Marco Bernasconi whose comments on the final version were of great help, and Jurriaan M. de Vos for help with the software BayesTraits.</p>
</sec>
</ack>
<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><aug><au><snm>Blankenship</snm><fnm>RE</fnm></au></aug><source>Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis</source><publisher>Blackwell Science, Oxford</publisher><pubdate>2002</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>Dating the rise of atmospheric oxygen</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bekker</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Holland</snm><fnm>HD</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>PL</fnm></au><au><snm>Rumble</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Stein</snm><fnm>HJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Hannah</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au><au><snm>Coetzee</snm><fnm>LL</fnm></au><au><snm>Beukes</snm><fnm>NJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>427</volume><issue>6970</issue><fpage>117</fpage><lpage>120</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nature02260</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14712267</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>The paleoproterozoic snowball Earth: A climate disaster triggered by the evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kopp</snm><fnm>RE</fnm></au><au><snm>Kirschvink</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au><au><snm>Hilburn</snm><fnm>IA</fnm></au><au><snm>Nash</snm><fnm>CZ</fnm></au></aug><source>Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>102</volume><issue>32</issue><fpage>11131</fpage><lpage>11136</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.0504878102</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1183582</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">16061801</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>The evolutionary diversification of cyanobacteria: Molecular-phylogenetic and paleontological perspectives</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tomitani</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Knoll</snm><fnm>AH</fnm></au><au><snm>Cavanaugh</snm><fnm>CM</fnm></au><au><snm>Ohno</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>103</volume><issue>14</issue><fpage>5442</fpage><lpage>5447</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.0600999103</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1459374</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">16569695</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Evolutionary biology: Out of thin air</p></title><aug><au><snm>Allen</snm><fnm>JF</fnm></au><au><snm>Martin</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>445</volume><fpage>610</fpage><lpage>612</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/445610a</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17287803</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>Reassessing the first appearance of eukaryotes and cyanobacteria</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rasmussen</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Fletcher</snm><fnm>IR</fnm></au><au><snm>Brocks</snm><fnm>JJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Kilburn</snm><fnm>MR</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>455</volume><issue>7216</issue><fpage>1101</fpage><lpage>U9</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nature07381</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18948954</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Fluctuations in Precambrian atmospheric oxygenation recorded by chromium isotopes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Frei</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Gaucher</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Poulton</snm><fnm>SW</fnm></au><au><snm>Canfield</snm><fnm>DE</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>461</volume><issue>7261</issue><fpage>250</fpage><lpage>U125</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nature08266</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19741707</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>Generic Assignments, Strain Histories and Properties of Pure Cultures of Cyanobacteria</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rippka</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Deruelles</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Waterbury</snm><fnm>JB</fnm></au><au><snm>Herdman</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Stanier</snm><fnm>RY</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal Of General Microbiology</source><pubdate>1979</pubdate><volume>111</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>61</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B9"><aug><au><snm>Castenholz</snm><fnm>RW</fnm></au></aug><source>Bergey&apos;s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology: The Archaea and the Deeply Branching and Phototropic Bacteria: Cyanobacteria</source><publisher>Springer Verlag</publisher><pubdate>2001</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>The Origin of Multicellularity</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bonner</snm><fnm>JT</fnm></au></aug><source>Integr Biol</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>1</volume><fpage>28</fpage><lpage>36</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>Motility, mixing, and multicellularity</p></title><aug><au><snm>Solari</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Kessler</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Goldstein</snm><fnm>RE</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>8</volume><fpage>115</fpage><lpage>129</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s10710-007-9029-7</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>Modes of pre-Ediacaran multicellularity</p></title><aug><au><snm>Butterfield</snm><fnm>NJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Precambrian Research</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>173</volume><issue>1-4</issue><fpage>201</fpage><lpage>211</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.precamres.2009.01.008</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>Observation of Mieroplasmodesmata in both Heterocyst-Forming and Non-Heterocyst Forming Filamentous Cyanobacteria by Freeze-Fracture Electron Microscopy</p></title><aug><au><snm>Giddings</snm><fnm>TJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Staehelin</snm><fnm>LA</fnm></au></aug><source>Archives of Microbiology</source><pubdate>1981</pubdate><volume>129</volume><fpage>295</fpage><lpage>298</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF00414700</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Is the periplasm continuous in filamentous multicellular cyanobacteria?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Flores</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Herrero</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Wolk</snm><fnm>CP</fnm></au><au><snm>Maldener</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au></aug><source>Trends in Microbiology</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>14</volume><fpage>439</fpage><lpage>443</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.tim.2006.08.007</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16934472</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>Mechanism of intercellular molecular exchange in heterocyst-forming cyanobacteria</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mullineaux</snm><fnm>CW</fnm></au><au><snm>Mariscal</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Nenninger</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Khanum</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Herrero</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Flores</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Adams</snm><fnm>DG</fnm></au></aug><source>European Molecular Biology Organization Journal</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>27</volume><fpage>1299</fpage><lpage>1308</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>Compartmentalized function through cell differentiation in filamentous cyanobacteria</p></title><aug><au><snm>Flores</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Herrero</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature Reviews Microbiology</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>8</volume><fpage>39</fpage><lpage>50</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nrmicro2242</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19966815</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><aug><au><snm>Bonner</snm><fnm>JT</fnm></au></aug><source>The evolution of complexity by means of natural selection</source><publisher>Princeton University Press</publisher><pubdate>1988</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>Precambrian Microflora, Belcher Islands, Canada - Significance And Systematics</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hofmann</snm><fnm>HJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal Of Paleontology</source><pubdate>1976</pubdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>1040</fpage><lpage>1073</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>Microfossils in 2000 Ma old cherty stromatolites of the Franceville Group, Gabon</p></title><aug><au><snm>Amard</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Bertrand-Sarfati</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Precambrian Research</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>81</volume><issue>3-4</issue><fpage>197</fpage><lpage>221</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0301-9268(96)00035-6</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B20"><title><p>Disparate rates, differing fates: Tempo and mode of evolution changed from the Precambrian to the Phanerozoic</p></title><aug><au><snm>Schopf</snm><fnm>JW</fnm></au></aug><source>PNAS</source><pubdate>1994</pubdate><volume>91</volume><fpage>6735</fpage><lpage>6742</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.91.15.6735</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">44277</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">8041691</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p>The distribution of microfossil assemblages in Proterozoic rocks</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sergeev</snm><fnm>VN</fnm></au></aug><source>Precambrian Research</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>173</volume><issue>1-4</issue><fpage>212</fpage><lpage>222</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.precamres.2009.04.002</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B22"><title><p>Microfossils And Possible Microfossils From The Early Archean Onverwacht Group, Barberton Mountain Land, South-Africa</p></title><aug><au><snm>Walsh</snm><fnm>MM</fnm></au></aug><source>Precambrian Research</source><pubdate>1992</pubdate><volume>54</volume><issue>2-4</issue><fpage>271</fpage><lpage>293</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0301-9268(92)90074-X</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">11540926</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B23"><title><p>Photosynthetic microbial mats in the 3,416-Myr-old ocean</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tice</snm><fnm>MM</fnm></au><au><snm>Lowe</snm><fnm>DR</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>431</volume><fpage>549</fpage><lpage>552</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nature02888</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15457255</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B24"><title><p>Evidence of Archean life: Stromatolites and microfossils</p></title><aug><au><snm>Schopf</snm><fnm>JW</fnm></au><au><snm>Kudryavtsec</snm><fnm>AB</fnm></au><au><snm>Czaja</snm><fnm>AD</fnm></au><au><snm>Tripathi</snm><fnm>AB</fnm></au></aug><source>Precambrian Research</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>158</volume><fpage>141</fpage><lpage>155</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.precamres.2007.04.009</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B25"><title><p>The 3.466 Ga "Kitty's Gap Chert," an early Archean microbial ecosystem</p></title><aug><au><snm>Westall</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>de Vries</snm><fnm>ST</fnm></au><au><snm>Nijman</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Rouchon</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Orberger</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Watson</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Verchovsky</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Wright</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Rouzaud</snm><fnm>JN</fnm></au><au><snm>Marchesini</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Severine</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>GSA Special Papers</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>405</volume><fpage>105</fpage><lpage>131</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B26"><aug><au><snm>Wacey</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Early Life on Earth: A practical Guide</source><publisher>Springer</publisher><pubdate>2009</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B27"><title><p>Microfossils of the Early Archean Apex Chert: New Evidence of the Antiquity of life</p></title><aug><au><snm>Schopf</snm><fnm>JW</fnm></au></aug><source>Science</source><pubdate>1993</pubdate><volume>260</volume><fpage>640</fpage><lpage>646</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.260.5108.640</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11539831</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B28"><title><p>Evidence of archean life: Stromatolites and microfossils</p></title><aug><au><snm>Schopf</snm><fnm>JW</fnm></au><au><snm>Kudryavtsev</snm><fnm>AB</fnm></au><au><snm>Czaja</snm><fnm>AD</fnm></au><au><snm>Tripathi</snm><fnm>AB</fnm></au></aug><source>Precambrian Research</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>158</volume><issue>3-4</issue><fpage>141</fpage><lpage>155</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.precamres.2007.04.009</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B29"><title><p>Earth's oldest (similar to 3.5 Ga) fossils and the 'Early Eden hypothesis': Questioning the evidence</p></title><aug><au><snm>Brasier</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Green</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Lindsay</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Steele</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Origins Of Life And Evolution Of The Biosphere</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1-2</issue><fpage>257</fpage><lpage>269</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1023/B:ORIG.0000009845.62244.d3</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14979661</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B30"><title><p>A fresh look at the fossil evidence for early Archaean cellular life</p></title><aug><au><snm>Brasier</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>McLoughlin</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Green</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Wacey</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Phil Trans R Soc B</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>361</volume><fpage>887</fpage><lpage>902</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1098/rstb.2006.1835</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1578727</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">16754605</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B31"><title><p>Evolutionary Relationships Among Cyanobacteria And Green Chloroplasts</p></title><aug><au><snm>Giovannoni</snm><fnm>SJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Turner</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Olsen</snm><fnm>GJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Barns</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Lane</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Pace</snm><fnm>NR</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Bacteriology</source><pubdate>1988</pubdate><volume>170</volume><fpage>3584</fpage><lpage>3592</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">211332</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">3136142</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B32"><title><p>Detection of seven major evolutionary lineages in cyanobacteria based on the 16 S rRNA gene sequence analysis with new sequences of five marine Synechococcus strains</p></title><aug><au><snm>Honda</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Yokota</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Sugiyama</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal Of Molecular Evolution</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>48</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>723</fpage><lpage>739</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/PL00006517</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10229577</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B33"><title><p>Investigating deep phylogenetic relationships among cyanobacteria and plastids by small submit rRNA sequence analysis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Turner</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Pryer</snm><fnm>KM</fnm></au><au><snm>Miao</snm><fnm>VP</fnm></au><au><snm>Palmer</snm><fnm>JD</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal Of Eukaryotic Microbiology</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>327</fpage><lpage>338</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1550-7408.1999.tb04612.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">10461381</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B34"><title><p>Evidence for polyphyletic origin of the members of the orders of Oscillatoriales and Pleurocapsales as determined by 16 S rDNA analysis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ishida</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Watanabe</snm><fnm>MM</fnm></au><au><snm>Sugiyama</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Yokota</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Fems Microbiology Letters</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>201</volume><fpage>79</fpage><lpage>82</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10736.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">11445171</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B35"><title><p>Phylogenetic and morphological diversity of cyanobacteria in soil desert crusts from the Colorado Plateau</p></title><aug><au><snm>Garcia-Pichel</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Lopez-Cortes</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Nubel</snm><fnm>U</fnm></au></aug><source>Applied And Environmental Microbiology</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>67</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>1902</fpage><lpage>1910</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1128/AEM.67.4.1902-1910.2001</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">92812</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">11282648</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B36"><title><p>A molecular test of cyanobacterial phylogeny: inferences from constraint analyses</p></title><aug><au><snm>Litvaitis</snm><fnm>MK</fnm></au></aug><source>Hydrobiologia</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>468</volume><fpage>135</fpage><lpage>145</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1023/A:1015262621848</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B37"><title><p>Morphological and habitat evolution in the Cyanobacteria using a compartmentalization approach</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sanchez-Baracaldo</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Hayes</snm><fnm>PK</fnm></au><au><snm>Blank</snm><fnm>CE</fnm></au></aug><source>Geobiology</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>145</fpage><lpage>165</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1472-4669.2005.00050.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B38"><title><p>Integrating markov clustering and molecular phylogenetics to reconstruct the cyanobacterial species tree from conserved protein families</p></title><aug><au><snm>Swingley</snm><fnm>WD</fnm></au><au><snm>Blankenship</snm><fnm>RE</fnm></au><au><snm>Raymond</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Molecular Biology And Evolution</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>643</fpage><lpage>654</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/molbev/msn034</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18296704</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B39"><title><p>Timing of morphological and ecological innovations in the cyanobacteria - a key to understanding the rise in atmospheric oxygen</p></title><aug><au><snm>Blank</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Sanchez-Baracaldo</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Geobiology</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>8</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>23</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1472-4669.2009.00220.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19863595</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B40"><title><p>Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree</p></title><aug><au><snm>Doolittle</snm><fnm>WF</fnm></au></aug><source>Science</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>284</volume><issue>5423</issue><fpage>2124</fpage><lpage>2128</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.284.5423.2124</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10381871</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B41"><title><p>Stochastic models for horizontal gene transfer: Taking a random walk through tree space</p></title><aug><au><snm>Suchard</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>170</volume><fpage>419</fpage><lpage>431</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1534/genetics.103.025692</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1449731</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">15781714</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B42"><title><p>PentaPlot: A software tool for the illustration of genome mosaicism</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hamel</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhaxybayeva</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Gogarten</snm><fnm>JP</fnm></au></aug><source>BMC Bioinformatics</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>6</volume><fpage>139</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2105-6-139</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1177926</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">15938752</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B43"><title><p>The photosynthetic apparatus of Prochlorococcus: Insights through comparative genomics</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hess</snm><fnm>WR</fnm></au><au><snm>Rocap</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Ting</snm><fnm>CS</fnm></au><au><snm>Larimer</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Stilwagen</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Lamerdin</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Chisholm</snm><fnm>SW</fnm></au></aug><source>Photosynthesis Research</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>70</volume><fpage>53</fpage><lpage>71</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1023/A:1013835924610</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">16228362</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B44"><title><p>Phylogenetic analyses of Synechococcus strains (cyanobacteria) using sequences of 16 S rDNA and part of the phycocyanin operon reveal multiple evolutionary lines and reflect phycobilin content</p></title><aug><au><snm>Robertson</snm><fnm>BR</fnm></au><au><snm>Tezuka</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Watanabe</snm><fnm>MM</fnm></au></aug><source>International Journal Of Systematic And Evolutionary Microbiology</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>51</volume><fpage>861</fpage><lpage>871</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11411708</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B45"><title><p>Genome divergence in two Prochlorococcus ecotypes reflects oceanic niche differentiation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rocap</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Larimer</snm><fnm>FW</fnm></au><au><snm>Lamerdin</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Malfatti</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Chain</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Ahlgren</snm><fnm>NA</fnm></au><au><snm>Arellano</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Coleman</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Hauser</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Hess</snm><fnm>WR</fnm></au><au><snm>Johnson</snm><fnm>ZI</fnm></au><au><snm>Land</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Lindell</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Post</snm><fnm>AF</fnm></au><au><snm>Regala</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Shah</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Shaw</snm><fnm>SL</fnm></au><au><snm>Steglich</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Sullivan</snm><fnm>MB</fnm></au><au><snm>Ting</snm><fnm>CS</fnm></au><au><snm>Tolonen</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Webb</snm><fnm>EA</fnm></au><au><snm>Zinser</snm><fnm>ER</fnm></au><au><snm>Chisholm</snm><fnm>SW</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>424</volume><issue>6952</issue><fpage>1042</fpage><lpage>1047</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nature01947</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12917642</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B46"><title><p>Ecosystem-dependent adaptive radiations of picocyanobacteria inferred from 16 S rRNA and ITS-1 sequence analysis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ernst</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Becker</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Wollenzien</snm><fnm>UIA</fnm></au><au><snm>Postius</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Microbiology-Sgm</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>149</volume><fpage>217</fpage><lpage>228</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1099/mic.0.25475-0</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B47"><title><p>Unraveling the genomic mosaic of a ubiquitous genus of marine cyanobacteria</p></title><aug><au><snm>Dufresne</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Ostrowski</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Scanlan</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Garczarek</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Mazard</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Palenik</snm><fnm>BP</fnm></au><au><snm>Paulsen</snm><fnm>IT</fnm></au><au><snm>de Marsac</snm><fnm>NT</fnm></au><au><snm>Wincker</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Dossat</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Ferriera</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Johnson</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Post</snm><fnm>AF</fnm></au><au><snm>Hess</snm><fnm>WR</fnm></au><au><snm>Partensky</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Genome Biology</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>9</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>R90.</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/gb-2008-9-5-r90</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2441476</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">18507822</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B48"><title><p>Ecological Genomics of Marine Picocyanobacteria</p></title><aug><au><snm>Scanlan</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Ostrowski</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Mazard</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Dufresne</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Garczarek</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Hess</snm><fnm>WR</fnm></au><au><snm>Post</snm><fnm>AF</fnm></au><au><snm>Hagemann</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Paulsen</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Partensky</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Microbiology And Molecular Biology Reviews</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>73</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>249</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1128/MMBR.00035-08</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2698417</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">19487728</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B49"><title><p>Eubacterial phylogeny based on translational apparatus proteins</p></title><aug><au><snm>Brochier</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Bapteste</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Moreira</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Philippe</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Trends in Genetics</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>18</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>4</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02522-7</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11750686</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B50"><title><p>A genomic timescale of prokaryote evolution: insights into the origin of methanogenesis, phototrophy, and the colonization of land</p></title><aug><au><snm>Battistuzzi</snm><fnm>FU</fnm></au><au><snm>Feijao</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Hedges</snm><fnm>SB</fnm></au></aug><source>BMC Evolutionary Biology</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>4</volume><issue>44</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">533871</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">15535883</pubid><pubid idtype="pubmed" link="fulltext">15535883</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B51"><title><p>Toward Automatic Reconstruction of a Highly Resolved Tree of Life</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ciccarelli</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Doerks</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>von Mering</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Creevey</snm><fnm>CJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Snel</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Bork</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Science</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>311</volume><fpage>1283</fpage><lpage>1286</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.1123061</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16513982</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B52"><title><p>A Major Clade of Prokaryotes with Ancient Adaptations to Life on Land</p></title><aug><au><snm>Battistuzzi</snm><fnm>FU</fnm></au><au><snm>Hedges</snm><fnm>SB</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Biol Evol</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>335</fpage><lpage>343</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/molbev/msn247</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18988685</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B53"><title><p>Phylogenetic Analysis Of Tufa Sequences Indicates A Cyanobacterial Origin Of All Plastids</p></title><aug><au><snm>Delwiche</snm><fnm>CF</fnm></au><au><snm>Kuhsel</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Palmer</snm><fnm>JD</fnm></au></aug><source>Molecular Phylogenetics And Evolution</source><pubdate>1995</pubdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>110</fpage><lpage>128</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/mpev.1995.1012</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">7663757</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B54"><title><p>The phylogenetic relationships of cyanobacteria inferred from 16SrRNA, gyrB, rpoC1 and rpoD1 gene sequences</p></title><aug><au><snm>Seo</snm><fnm>PS</fnm></au><au><snm>Yokota</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>49</volume><fpage>191</fpage><lpage>203</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.2323/jgam.49.191</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12949700</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B55"><title><p>Photosystem I from the unusual cyanobacterium Gloeobacter violaceus</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mangels</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Kruip</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Berry</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>R&#246;gner</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Boekema</snm><fnm>EJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Koenig</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Photosynthesis Research</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>72</volume><fpage>307</fpage><lpage>319</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1023/A:1019822316789</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">16228529</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B56"><title><p>Complete Genome Structure of Gloeobacter violaceus PCC7421 a Cyanobacterium that Lacks Thylakoids</p></title><aug><au><snm>Nakamura</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Kaneko</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Sato</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Mimuro</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Myashita</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Tsuchiya</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Sasamoto</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Watanabe</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Kawashima</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Kishida</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Kiyokawa</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Kohara</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Matsumoto</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Matsuno</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Nakazaki</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Shimpo</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Takeuchi</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Yamada</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Tabata</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>DNA Research</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>10</volume><fpage>137</fpage><lpage>145</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/dnares/10.4.137</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14621292</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B57"><title><p>Phylogenetic mapping of bacterial morphology</p></title><aug><au><snm>Siefert</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au><au><snm>Fox</snm><fnm>GE</fnm></au></aug><source>Microbiology And Molecular Biology Reviews</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>144</volume><fpage>2803</fpage><lpage>2808</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B58"><title><p>Mat-forming coccoid cyanobacteria from early Silurian marine deposits of Sudetes, Poland</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kremer</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au></aug><source>Acta Palaeontologica Polonica</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>51</volume><fpage>143</fpage><lpage>154</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B59"><title><p>Polyphyly of true branching cyanobacteria (Stigonematales)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Gugger</snm><fnm>MF</fnm></au><au><snm>Hoffmann</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au></aug><source>International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>54</volume><fpage>349</fpage><lpage>357</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1099/ijs.0.02744-0</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15023942</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B60"><title><p>Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Maddison</snm><fnm>WP</fnm></au><au><snm>Maddison</snm><fnm>DR</fnm></au></aug><source>Version 2.71</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><url>http://mesquiteproject.org</url></bibl><bibl id="B61"><title><p>Reliability of Bayesian Posterior Probabilities and Bootstrap Frequencies in Phylogenetics</p></title><aug><au><snm>Erixon</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Svennblad</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Britton</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Oxelman</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au></aug><source>Syst Biol</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>52</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>665</fpage><lpage>673</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/10635150390235485</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14530133</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B62"><title><p>Frequentist Properties of Bayesian Posterior Probabilities of Phylogenetic Trees Under Simple and Complex Substitution Models</p></title><aug><au><snm>Huelsenbeck</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Rannala</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au></aug><source>Syst Biol</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>53</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>904</fpage><lpage>913</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/10635150490522629</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15764559</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B63"><title><p>The Posterior and the Prior in Bayesian Phylogenetics</p></title><aug><au><snm>Alfaro</snm><fnm>ME</fnm></au><au><snm>Holder</snm><fnm>MT</fnm></au></aug><source>Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>37</volume><fpage>19</fpage><lpage>42</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110021</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B64"><title><p>The Smallest Known Genomes of Multicellular and Toxic Cyanobacteria: Comparison, Minimal Gene Sets for Linked Traits and the Evolutionary Implications</p></title><aug><au><snm>Stucken</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>John</snm><fnm>U</fnm></au><au><snm>Cembella</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Murillo</snm><fnm>AA</fnm></au><au><snm>Soto-Liebe</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Fuentes-Vald&#233;s</snm><fnm>JJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Friedel</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Plominsky</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>V&#225;quez</snm><fnm>AM</fnm></au><au><snm>Gl&#246;ckner</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>PLoS One</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>e9235.</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0009235</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2821919</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">20169071</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B65"><title><p>Eukaryotic organisms in Proterozoic oceans</p></title><aug><au><snm>Knoll</snm><fnm>AH</fnm></au><au><snm>Javaux</snm><fnm>EJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Hewitt</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Cohen</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Phil Trans R Soc B</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>361</volume><fpage>1023</fpage><lpage>1038</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1098/rstb.2006.1843</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1578724</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">16754612</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B66"><aug><au><snm>Buss</snm><fnm>LW</fnm></au></aug><source>The Evolution of Individuality</source><publisher>Princeton University Press</publisher><pubdate>1987</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B67"><aug><au><snm>Maynard Smith</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Szathm&#225;ry</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>The Major Transitions in Evolution</source><publisher>W.H. Freeman and Spektrum</publisher><pubdate>1995</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B68"><title><p>Slime molds, ascidians, and the utility of evolutionary theory</p></title><aug><au><snm>Buss</snm><fnm>LW</fnm></au></aug><source>Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>96</volume><issue>16</issue><fpage>8801</fpage><lpage>8803</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.96.16.8801</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">33683</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">10430843</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B69"><aug><au><snm>Michod</snm><fnm>RE</fnm></au></aug><source>Darwinian Dynamics-Evolutionary Transitions in Fitness and Individuality</source><publisher>Princeton University Press</publisher><pubdate>1999</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B70"><title><p>Genetic heterogeneity within organisms and the evolution of individuality</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tuomi</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal Of Evolutionary Biology</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>1182</fpage><lpage>1183</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00811.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15525399</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B71"><title><p>Multiple Molecular Data Sets Suggest Independent Origins of Highly Eusocial Behavior in Bees (Hymenoptera: Apinae)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Cameron</snm><fnm>SA</fnm></au><au><snm>Mardulyn</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Syst Biol</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>50</volume><fpage>194</fpage><lpage>214</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/10635150151125851</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">12116928</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B72"><title><p>Evolution of sociality in a primitively eusocial lineage of bees</p></title><aug><au><snm>Danforth</snm><fnm>BN</fnm></au></aug><source>PNAS</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>99</volume><fpage>286</fpage><lpage>290</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.012387999</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">117553</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">11782550</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B73"><title><p>Chance and necessity: the evolution of morphological complexity and diversity</p></title><aug><au><snm>Carroll</snm><fnm>SB</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>409</volume><fpage>1102</fpage><lpage>1109</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/35059227</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11234024</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B74"><title><p>The Unicellular Ancestry of Animal Development</p></title><aug><au><snm>King</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au></aug><source>Developmental Cell</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>7</volume><fpage>313</fpage><lpage>325</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.devcel.2004.08.010</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15363407</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B75"><title><p>The Evolution of Multicellularity: A Minor Major Transition?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Grosberg</snm><fnm>RK</fnm></au><au><snm>Strathmann</snm><fnm>RR</fnm></au></aug><source>Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>38</volume><fpage>621</fpage><lpage>54</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102403.114735</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B76"><title><p>Phylogeny of Eusocial Lasioglossum Reveals Multiple Losses of Eusociality Within a Primitively Eusocial Clade of Bees (Hymenoptera:Halictidae)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Danforth</snm><fnm>BN</fnm></au><au><snm>Conway</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Shuqing</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Syst Biol</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>52</volume><fpage>23</fpage><lpage>36</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/10635150390132687</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12554437</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B77"><title><p>A case of reversal: The evolution and maintenance of sexuals from parthenogenetic clones in Hieracium pilosella</p></title><aug><au><snm>Chapman</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Houliston</snm><fnm>GJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Robson</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Iline</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au></aug><source>International Journal of Plant Science</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>164</volume><fpage>719</fpage><lpage>728</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1086/376819</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B78"><title><p>Loss and recovery of wings in stick insects</p></title><aug><au><snm>Whiting</snm><fnm>MF</fnm></au><au><snm>Bradler</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Maxwell</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>421</volume><fpage>264</fpage><lpage>267</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nature01313</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12529642</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B79"><title><p>Reevolution of sexuality breaks Dollo's law</p></title><aug><au><snm>Domes</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Norton</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au><au><snm>Maraun</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Scheu</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>PNAS</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>104</volume><fpage>7139</fpage><lpage>7144</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.0700034104</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1855408</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">17438282</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B80"><title><p>Genetic changes associated with floral adaptation restrict future evolutionary potential</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zufall</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au><au><snm>Rausher</snm><fnm>MD</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>428</volume><fpage>847</fpage><lpage>850</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nature02489</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15103375</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B81"><title><p>Ancient polymorphism reveals unidirectional breeding system shifts</p></title><aug><au><snm>Igic</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Bohs</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Kohn</snm><fnm>JR</fnm></au></aug><source>PNAS</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>103</volume><fpage>1359</fpage><lpage>1363</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.0506283103</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1360522</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">16428289</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B82"><title><p>On Irreversible Evolution</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bull</snm><fnm>JJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Charnov</snm><fnm>EL</fnm></au></aug><source>Evolution</source><pubdate>1985</pubdate><volume>39</volume><fpage>1149</fpage><lpage>1155</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/2408742</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B83"><title><p>Questioning the evidence for Earth's oldest fossils</p></title><aug><au><snm>Brasier</snm><fnm>MD</fnm></au><au><snm>Green</snm><fnm>OR</fnm></au><au><snm>Jephcoat</snm><fnm>AP</fnm></au><au><snm>Kleppe</snm><fnm>AK</fnm></au><au><snm>Van Kranendonk</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Lindsay</snm><fnm>JF</fnm></au><au><snm>Steele</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Grassineau</snm><fnm>NV</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>416</volume><fpage>76</fpage><lpage>81</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/416076a</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11882895</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B84"><title><p>A new window into Early Archean life: Microbial mats in Earth's oldest siliciclastic tidal deposits (3.2 Ga Moodies Group, South Africa)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Noffke</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Eriksson</snm><fnm>KA</fnm></au><au><snm>Hazen</snm><fnm>RM</fnm></au><au><snm>Simpson</snm><fnm>EL</fnm></au></aug><source>Geology</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>34</volume><fpage>253</fpage><lpage>256</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1130/G22246.1</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B85"><title><p>Diverse microstructures from Archaean chert from the mount goldsworthy-mount grant area, Pilbara Craton, Western Australia: Microfossils, dubiofossils, or pseudofossils?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sugitani</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Grey</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Allwood</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Nagaoka</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Mimura</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Minami</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Marshall</snm><fnm>CP</fnm></au><au><snm>Van Kranendonk</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Walter</snm><fnm>MR</fnm></au></aug><source>Precambrian Research</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>158</volume><fpage>228</fpage><lpage>262</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.precamres.2007.03.006</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B86"><title><p>Microbial remains in some earliest Earth rocks: Comparison with a potential modern analogue</p></title><aug><au><snm>Glikson</snm><fnm>LJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Duck</snm><fnm>Mand</fnm></au><au><snm>Golding</snm><fnm>ASD</fnm></au><au><snm>Hofmann</snm><fnm>Axel</fnm></au><au><snm>Bolhar</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Webb</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Baiano</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Sly</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au></aug><source>Precambrian Research</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>164</volume><fpage>187</fpage><lpage>200</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.precamres.2008.05.002</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B87"><title><p>Use of NanoSIMS in the search for early life on Earth: ambient inclusion trails in a c. 3400 Ma sandstone</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wacey</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Kilburn</snm><fnm>MR</fnm></au><au><snm>McLoughlin</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Parnell</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Stoake</snm><fnm>CA</fnm></au><au><snm>Grovenor</snm><fnm>CRM</fnm></au><au><snm>Brasier</snm><fnm>MD</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of the Geological Society</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>1</volume><fpage>43</fpage><lpage>53</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1144/0016-76492007-032</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B88"><title><p>Filamentous microfossils in the early proterozoic transvaal supergroup: their morphology, significance, and paleoenvironmental setting</p></title><aug><au><snm>Klein</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Beukes</snm><fnm>NJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Schopf</snm><fnm>JW</fnm></au></aug><source>Precambrian Research</source><pubdate>1987</pubdate><volume>36</volume><fpage>81</fpage><lpage>94</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0301-9268(87)90018-0</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B89"><title><p>Microfossils from the Neoarchean Campbell Group, Griqualand West Sequence of the Transvaal Supergroup, and their paleoenvironmental and evolutionary implications</p></title><aug><au><snm>Altermann</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Schopf</snm><fnm>JW</fnm></au></aug><source>Precambrian Research</source><pubdate>1995</pubdate><volume>75</volume><fpage>65</fpage><lpage>90</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0301-9268(95)00018-Z</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">11542814</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B90"><title><p>Early Archean (3.3-Billion to 3.5-Billion-Year-Old) Microfossils from Warrawoona Group, Australia</p></title><aug><au><snm>Schopf</snm><fnm>JW</fnm></au><au><snm>Packer</snm><fnm>BM</fnm></au></aug><source>Science</source><pubdate>1987</pubdate><volume>237</volume><fpage>70</fpage><lpage>73</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.11539686</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11539686</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B91"><title><p>Archaean Microfossils Showing Cell Division from the Swaziland System of South Africa</p></title><aug><au><snm>Knoll</snm><fnm>AH</fnm></au><au><snm>Barghoorn</snm><fnm>ES</fnm></au></aug><source>Science</source><pubdate>1977</pubdate><volume>198</volume><fpage>396</fpage><lpage>398</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.198.4315.396</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17809440</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B92"><title><p>Alga-Like Fossils from the Early Precambrian of South Africa</p></title><aug><au><snm>Schopf</snm><fnm>JW</fnm></au><au><snm>Barghoorn</snm><fnm>ES</fnm></au></aug><source>Science</source><pubdate>1967</pubdate><volume>156</volume><fpage>506</fpage><lpage>512</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.156.3774.508</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B93"><title><p>The evolutionary path to terminal differentiation and division of labor in cyanobacteria.</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rossetti</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Schirrmeister</snm><fnm>BE</fnm></au><au><snm>Bernasconi</snm><fnm>MV</fnm></au><au><snm>Bagheri</snm><fnm>HC</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Theoretical Biology</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>262</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>23</fpage><lpage>34</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.09.009</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19761779</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B94"><title><p>A Whiff of Oxygen Before the Great Oxidation Event?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Anbar</snm><fnm>AD</fnm></au><au><snm>Duan</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Lyons</snm><fnm>TW</fnm></au><au><snm>Arnold</snm><fnm>GL</fnm></au><au><snm>Kendall</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Creaser</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au><au><snm>Kaufman</snm><fnm>AJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Gordon</snm><fnm>GW</fnm></au><au><snm>Scott</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Garvin</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Buick</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Science</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>317</volume><fpage>1903</fpage><lpage>1906</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.1140325</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17901330</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B95"><title><p>Macroevolution and macroecology through deep time</p></title><aug><au><snm>Butterfield</snm><fnm>NJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Palaeontology</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>50</volume><fpage>41</fpage><lpage>55</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00613.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B96"><title><p>Evolution: Tempo and Mode</p></title><aug><au><snm>Damuth</snm><fnm>JD</fnm></au></aug><source>Encyclopedia of Life Science</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>7</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B97"><title><p>Ecological Theory For Sudden Origin Of Multicellular Life In Late Precambrian - (Adaptive Radiation-Cambrian-Evolution-Paleontology-Predation)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Stanley</snm><fnm>SM</fnm></au></aug><source>Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America</source><pubdate>1973</pubdate><volume>70</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>1486</fpage><lpage>1489</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.70.5.1486</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">433525</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">16592084</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B98"><title><p>Phagotrophy by a flagellate selects for colonial prey: A possible origin of multicellularity</p></title><aug><au><snm>Boraas</snm><fnm>ME</fnm></au><au><snm>Seale</snm><fnm>DB</fnm></au><au><snm>Boxhorn</snm><fnm>JE</fnm></au></aug><source>Evolutionary Ecology</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>153</fpage><lpage>164</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1023/A:1006527528063</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B99"><title><p>Building a multicellular organism</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kaiser</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Annual Review Of Genetics</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>35</volume><fpage>103</fpage><lpage>123</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.090145</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11700279</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B100"><title><p>Selective advantage for multicellular replicative strategies: A two-cell example</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tannenbaum</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>Physical Review E</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>73</volume><fpage>010904</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1103/PhysRevE.73.010904</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B101"><title><p>MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform</p></title><aug><au><snm>Katoh</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Misawa</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Kuma</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Miyata</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>Nucleic Acids res</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>30</volume><fpage>3059</fpage><lpage>3066</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/nar/gkf436</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">135756</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">12136088</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B102"><title><p>The CIPRES Portals. CIPRES</p></title><aug><au><snm>Miller</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Holder</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Vos</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Midford</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Liebowitz</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Chan</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Hoover</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Warnow</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><pubdate>2009</pubdate><url>http://www.phylo.org/sub_sections/portal</url></bibl><bibl id="B103"><title><p>BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/97/NT</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hall</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>41</volume><fpage>95</fpage><lpage>98</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B104"><title><p>RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models</p></title><aug><au><snm>Stamatakis</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Bioinformatics</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>22</volume><issue>21</issue><fpage>2688</fpage><lpage>2690</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16928733</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B105"><title><p>A New Method For Calculating Evolutionary Substitution Rates</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lanave</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Preparata</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Saccone</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Serio</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal Of Molecular Evolution</source><pubdate>1984</pubdate><volume>20</volume><fpage>86</fpage><lpage>93</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF02101990</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">6429346</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B106"><title><p>The General Stochastic-Model Of Nucleotide Substitution</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rodriguez</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Oliver</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au><au><snm>Marin</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Medina</snm><fnm>JR</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal Of Theoretical Biology</source><pubdate>1990</pubdate><volume>142</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>485</fpage><lpage>501</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80104-3</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">2338834</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B107"><title><p>The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools</p></title><aug><au><snm>Thompson</snm><fnm>JD</fnm></au><au><snm>Gibson</snm><fnm>TJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Plewniak</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Jeanmougin</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Higgins</snm><fnm>DG</fnm></au></aug><source>Nucleic Acids Research</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>25</volume><issue>24</issue><fpage>4876</fpage><lpage>4882</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/nar/25.24.4876</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">147148</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">9396791</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B108"><title><p>MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ronquist</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Huelsenbeck</snm><fnm>JP</fnm></au></aug><source>Bioinformatics</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>19</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1572</fpage><lpage>1574</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12912839</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B109"><title><p>DAMBE: Data analysis in molecular biology and evolution</p></title><aug><au><snm>Xia</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Xie</snm><fnm>Z</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Heredity</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>92</volume><fpage>371</fpage><lpage>373</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/jhered/92.4.371</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11535656</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B110"><title><p>Data analysis in molecular biology and evolution</p></title><aug><au><snm>Xia</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au></aug><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston</publisher><pubdate>2001</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B111"><title><p>An index of substitution saturation and its application</p></title><aug><au><snm>Xia</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Xie</snm><fnm>Z</fnm></au><au><snm>Salemi</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Chen</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au></aug><source>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>26</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>7</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00326-3</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12470932</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B112"><title><p>Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zwickl</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au></aug><source>PhD-Dissertation</source><publisher>The University of Texas at Austin</publisher><pubdate>2006</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B113"><title><p>MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution</p></title><aug><au><snm>Posada</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Crandall</snm><fnm>KA</fnm></au></aug><source>Bioinformatics</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>14</volume><issue>9</issue><fpage>817</fpage><lpage>818</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9918953</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B114"><title><p>SumTrees: Summarization of Split Support on Phylogenetic Trees. Version 1.0.2</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sukumaran</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>DendroPy Phylogenetic Computation Library Version 2.0.3</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B115"><title><p>Tracer v1.4 [online]</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rambaut</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Drummond</snm><fnm>AJ</fnm></au></aug><pubdate>2007</pubdate><url>http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/</url></bibl><bibl id="B116"><title><p>AWTY: A system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetic inference</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wilgenbusch</snm><fnm>JC</fnm></au><au><snm>Warren</snm><fnm>DL</fnm></au><au><snm>Swofford</snm><fnm>DL</fnm></au></aug><pubdate>2004</pubdate><url>http://ceb.csit.fsu.edu/awty</url></bibl><bibl id="B117"><title><p>Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pagel</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Meade</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Barker</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Systematic Biology</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>53</volume><fpage>673</fpage><lpage>684</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/10635150490522232</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15545248</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B118"><title><p>The rise of continents - An essay on the geologic consequences of photosynthesis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rosing</snm><fnm>MT</fnm></au><au><snm>Bird</snm><fnm>DK</fnm></au><au><snm>Sleep</snm><fnm>NH</fnm></au><au><snm>Glassley</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Albarede</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Science direct</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>232</volume><fpage>99</fpage><lpage>113</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B119"><title><p>Evidence from detrital zircons for the existence of continental crust and ceans on the Earth 4.4 Gyr ago</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wilde</snm><fnm>SA</fnm></au><au><snm>Valley</snm><fnm>JW</fnm></au><au><snm>Peck</snm><fnm>WH</fnm></au><au><snm>Graham</snm><fnm>CM</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>409</volume><fpage>175</fpage><lpage>178</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/35051550</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11196637</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B120"><title><p>Low-latitude glaciation in the Palaeoproterozoic era</p></title><aug><au><snm>Evans</snm><fnm>DA</fnm></au><au><snm>Beukes</snm><fnm>NJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Kirschvink</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>386</volume><fpage>262</fpage><lpage>266</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/386262a0</pubid></xrefbib></bibl></refgrp>
</bm></art>