<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>1471-2121-9-56</ui>
   <ji>1471-2121</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Research article</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Delayed internalization and lack of recycling in a beta<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptor fused to the G protein alpha-subunit</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1" ca="yes">
               <snm>Di Certo</snm>
               <mnm>Grazia</mnm>
               <fnm>Maria</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>mariagrazia.dicerto@inmm.cnr.it</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A2">
               <snm>Batassa</snm>
               <mi>M</mi>
               <fnm>Enrico</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
               <insr iid="I3"/>
               <email>e.batassa@ebri.it</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A3">
               <snm>Casella</snm>
               <fnm>Ida</fnm>
               <insr iid="I4"/>
               <email>ida.casella@iss.it</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A4">
               <snm>Serafino</snm>
               <fnm>Annalucia</fnm>
               <insr iid="I5"/>
               <email>annalucia.serafino@artov.inmm.cnr.it</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A5">
               <snm>Floridi</snm>
               <fnm>Aristide</fnm>
               <insr iid="I6"/>
               <insr iid="I7"/>
               <email>floridi@univaq.it</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A6">
               <snm>Passananti</snm>
               <fnm>Claudio</fnm>
               <insr iid="I8"/>
               <insr iid="I9"/>
               <email>passananti@ifo.it</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A7" ce="yes">
               <snm>Molinari</snm>
               <fnm>Paola</fnm>
               <insr iid="I4"/>
               <email>paola.molinari@iss.it</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A8" ce="yes">
               <snm>Mattei</snm>
               <fnm>Elisabetta</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <insr iid="I9"/>
               <email>elisabetta.mattei@inmm.cnr.it</email>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1">
               <p>Istituto di Neurobiologia e Medicina Molecolare, CNR, c/o Fondazione Santa Lucia/EBRI, Via del Fosso di Fiorano 64/65, 00143 Rome, Italy</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I2">
               <p>Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Cellulari ed Ematologia, Sezione di Genetica Molecolare, Universit&#224; di Roma "La Sapienza", Viale Regina Elena, 324 00161 Rome, Italy</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I3">
               <p>EBRI-European Brain Research Institute, Via del Fosso di Fiorano, 64/65, 00143 Rome, Italy</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I4">
               <p>Dipartimento del Farmaco, Istituto Superiore di Sanit&#224;, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I5">
               <p>Istituto di Neurobiologia e Medicina Molecolare, CNR, Tor Vergata, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere, 100 00133 Rome, Italy</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I6">
               <p>Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale, Via Vetoio, Coppito 2, Universit&#224; de L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I7">
               <p>Laboratory "B", Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Via delle Messi d'Oro, 156 00158 Rome, Italy</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I8">
               <p>Istituto di Biologia e Patologia Molecolari, CNR, c/o Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Via delle Messi d'Oro 156, 00158 Rome, Italy</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I9">
               <p>AIRC-Rome Oncogenomic Center (ROC), Via delle Messi d'Oro, 156 00158 Rome, Italy</p>
            </ins>
         </insg>
         <source>BMC Cell Biology</source>
         <issn>1471-2121</issn>
         <pubdate>2008</pubdate>
         <volume>9</volume>
         <issue>1</issue>
         <fpage>56</fpage>
         <url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2121/9/56</url>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubidlist>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">18840275</pubid>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2121-9-56</pubid>
            </pubidlist>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <rec>
            <date>
               <day>25</day>
               <month>3</month>
               <year>2008</year>
            </date>
         </rec>
         <acc>
            <date>
               <day>07</day>
               <month>10</month>
               <year>2008</year>
            </date>
         </acc>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>07</day>
               <month>10</month>
               <year>2008</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
      <cpyrt>
         <year>2008</year>
         <collab>Di Certo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab>
         <note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note>
      </cpyrt>
      <abs>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Abstract</p>
            </st>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Background</p>
               </st>
               <p>Chimeric proteins obtained by the fusion of a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) sequence to the N-terminus of the G protein &#945;-subunit have been extensively used to investigate several aspects of GPCR signalling. Although both the receptor and the G protein generally maintain a fully functional state in such polypeptides, original observations made using a chimera between the &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptor (&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR) and G&#945;<sub>s </sub>indicated that the fusion to the &#945;-subunit resulted in a marked reduction of receptor desensitization and down-regulation. To further investigate this phenomenon, we have compared the rates of internalization and recycling between wild-type and G&#945;<sub>s</sub>-fused &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Results</p>
               </st>
               <p>The rate of agonist-induced internalization, measured as the disappearance of cell surface immunofluorescence in HEK293 cells permanently expressing N-terminus tagged receptors, was reduced three-fold by receptor-G protein fusion. However, both fused and non-fused receptors translocated to the same endocytic compartment, as determined by dual-label confocal analysis of cells co-expressing both proteins and transferrin co-localization.</p>
               <p>Receptor recycling, determined as the reversion of surface immunofluorescence following the addition of antagonist to cells that were previously exposed to agonist, markedly differed between wild-type and fused receptors. While most of the internalized &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR returned rapidly to the plasma membrane, &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>did not recycle, and the observed slow recovery for the fusion protein immunofluorescence was entirely accounted for by protein synthesis.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Conclusion</p>
               </st>
               <p>The covalent linkage between &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR and G&#945;<sub>s </sub>does not appear to alter the initial endocytic translocation of the two proteins, although there is reduced efficiency. It does, however, completely disrupt the process of receptor and G protein recycling. We conclude that the physical separation between receptor and G&#945; is not necessary for the transit to early endosomes, but is an essential requirement for the correct post-endocytic sorting and recycling of the two proteins.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
      </abs>
   </fm>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Background</p>
         </st>
         <p>The activity of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is regulated by a sophisticated balance between molecular mechanisms governing receptor signalling, desensitization and resensitization. An important role in the regulation of GPCRs functions is played by the agonist-mediated internalization of receptors into intracellular compartments from which they may be sorted into specific endosomal pathways [reviewed in ref. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp>]. Thus, the characterization of the molecular events involved in the regulation of the intracellular trafficking of receptors is a fundamental question in cell biology.</p>
         <p>Over the past several years, the agonist-promoted internalization of &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptor (&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR), a prototypic member of the GPCR superfamily, has become the subject of intensive studies. Several investigations established that, in response to agonist stimulation, &#946;<sub>2</sub>ARs undergo rapid phosphorylation by both second messenger-dependent protein kinases and G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp>. This event targets receptors for the binding of arrestin proteins, which sterically uncouples receptors from their cognate heterotrimeric G proteins and favours the receptors endocytosis via clathrin-coated vesicles into endosomal compartments <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp>. As a consequence of this, &#946;<sub>2</sub>ARs are exposed to dephosphorylation, following which receptors are recycled back to the plasma membrane surface as fully sensitized receptors <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp>. Although many of the molecular mechanisms described for &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR might apply equally well to other GPCRs, the diversity in receptor structures corresponds to important differences in the intracellular trafficking patterns, as well as to the functional signal transduction of distinct GPCR subtypes. For example, regarding beta-subtypes of adrenergic receptors (&#946;<sub>1</sub>, &#946;<sub>2 </sub>and &#946;<sub>3</sub>-AR), it is known that, unlike &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR, &#946;<sub>3</sub>AR does not internalize in response to agonist; likewise, human &#946;<sub>1</sub>AR is more resistant to agonist-mediated down-regulation and, although it uses the same endocytosis mechanism as human &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR, it is sorted to different endosomal compartments <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>. Other GPCRs that internalize following agonist activation are targeted to lysosomes for degradation, or are retained within endosomal compartments <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr></abbrgrp>. Moreover, relatively little is known about the mechanisms that determine the specificity of GPCR trafficking after endocytosis. It is established that the sorting of internalized &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR between recycling and degradative endocytic pathways is controlled by a protein interaction involving the distal carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic domain of the receptor. Mutations of this sequence inhibit efficient recycling and cause the missorting of internalized receptors to lysosomes, thereby increasing the down-regulation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>Important advancements in the knowledge of intracellular trafficking of &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR have been reached through studies that used powerful tools, such as real-time optical-analysis, to visualize the dynamics of receptor trafficking in living cells. At first, the sub-cellular redistribution of epitope-tagged &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR in response to agonist activation was observed by confocal fluorescence microscopy, and then by direct visualization of &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-green fluorescent protein (GFP) chimeras in cells transiently or stably expressing the fusion protein <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>. Importantly, experiments employing this technical strategy have suggested that sequestered &#946;<sub>2</sub>ARs undergo processing through endosomal compartments in a similar way to that observed for constitutively internalized receptors, such as the transferrin receptor <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr></abbrgrp>. After internalization, &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR rapidly colocalizes with transferrin into recycling endosomal vesicles, but following prolonged exposure to agonist, it traffics through lysosomal vesicles as part of a down-regulation process <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>Moreover, relevant information about GPCR endocytosis emerged from studies that used GFP fusion proteins to provide the opportunity not only to observe &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptor trafficking, but also to study the functional dynamics of G proteins in real time. It was reported that, using a G&#945;<sub>s</sub>-GFP construct, stimulation of COS-1 cells with isoproterenol resulted in the movement of the G&#945;<sub>s</sub>-GFP fusion protein from the plasma membrane to the cytoplasm <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr></abbrgrp>. Moreover, Hynes et al. recently employed strategies that allowed the simultaneous imaging of the &#945; and &#946;&#947; components of heterotrimeric G proteins in live cells. They showed that Gs and &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR dissociate upon agonist stimulation, internalize via different mechanisms and traffic to distinct sub-cellular localizations <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp>. To further address this question, we report here a study on agonist-mediated internalization and intracellular sorting between the wild type adrenergic receptor, &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR, compared to that of the chimeric receptor, &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s</sub>, resulting from the fusion of &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptor with the amino-terminal of the G protein &#945;-subunit <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>Although the &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>exhibits an unaffected ability to transduce adrenergic signals and an increased sensitivity to agonists as compared to wild type receptor, here we show that the fusion of &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR to G&#945;<sub>s </sub>slows down agonist-induced internalization and strongly affects the recycling of receptor to the plasma membrane, even if &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>is targeted into endocytic compartments similar to those observed for the non-fused receptor.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Results and discussion</p>
         </st>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>MAPKs activation by &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>in HEK293 cells</p>
            </st>
            <p>GPCRs activate MAPKs by multiple converging mechanisms <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp>. To test the ability of the fusion protein &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>to induce MAPK signalling, the agonist-mediated activation of extra cellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2), also known as p42/44 MAPK, was analysed by western blotting. HEK293 cells stably expressing the &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>(HEK293/&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s</sub>) or wild type &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptor (HEK293/&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR) were treated for increasing times with the agonist isoproterenol (1 &#956;M), then cell extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE and blots were probed with a monoclonal antibody specific for the phosphorylated ERK1/2 proteins. As shown in figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>, the isoproterenol stimulation of HEK293/&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>resulted in both ERK-2 (major band at 42 kDa) and ERK-1 (minor band at 44 kDa) phosphorylation, whose activities were enhanced following 10 min of agonist treatment and then rapidly declined without other activation peaks within 4 hours. A similar time-course of ERK activation was observed in the cells stably expressing the wild type receptor.</p>
            <fig id="F1">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 1</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Agonist-mediated activation of endogenous MAP kinases</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Agonist-mediated activation of endogenous MAP kinases</b>. Agonist-mediated activation of MAP kinases (ERK1/2) was detected by immunoblotting performed on stably transfected cells expressing the fusion protein (HEK293/&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s</sub>) or the wild type &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptor (HEK293/&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR). Cells were first incubated in the absence (0) or presence of 1 &#956;M isoproterenol (ISO) for the indicated times, and then whole-cell extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE. The immunoreactivity of the endogenous ERK1/2 following agonist-induced phosphorylation was detected by probing blots with Phospho-p44/42 MAP kinases rabbit monoclonal antibody. Samples were normalized for protein content by reprobing blots with a monoclonal antibody to alpha-tubulin.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1471-2121-9-56-1"/>
            </fig>
            <p>In agreement with previous findings, this result confirms that the fusion of the G protein &#945;-subunit to &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR does not alter the functional properties of the receptor, which retains its ability to activate cellular signalling.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>and &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR show different internalization kinetics following agonist stimulation</p>
            </st>
            <p>The exposure of cell surface &#946;<sub>2</sub>ARs to agonist results in a time-dependent internalization of receptors. Internalization properties of the &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>fusion protein were investigated using both qualitative and quantitative experimental strategies. Immunofluorescence experiments were performed on HEK293 cells stably expressing the Flag-tagged chimeric (HEK293/&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s</sub>) or wild type (HEK293/&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR) receptors following visualization with an epifluorescence microscope. Figure <figr fid="F2">2A</figr> shows a typical experiment in which the cells were treated with 1 &#956;M isoproterenol for the indicated times, fixed in formaldehyde and subjected to indirect immunofluorescence using an anti-Flag antibody, as described in the <it>Methods </it>section. As shown in figure <figr fid="F2">2A</figr>, the wild type receptor rapidly disappeared from the plasma membrane within 5 minutes of agonist treatment. The same amount of time was not sufficient to induce a significant internalization of the chimeric receptor, as indicated by the high immunoreactivity to Flag-antibody retained on the plasma membrane of cells expressing the fusion protein. An appreciable decrease in the surface levels of the fusion protein started at 20 minutes, but the extensive loss of plasma membrane &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>was only observed after 60 minutes of agonist stimulation. At this time, indeed, the permeabilization of samples with a non-anionic detergent, performed before the immuno-staining procedure, allowed for the observation of an intracellular redistribution of the wild type as well as the chimeric receptor (fig. <figr fid="F2">2B</figr>). To quantify the internalization rates of the chimeric and wild type proteins, we performed a fluorimetric assay. HEK293 cells stably expressing &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>or native receptor were seeded onto multiwell plates and treated with 1 &#956;M isoproterenol for the indicated times (fig. <figr fid="F2">2C</figr>). After fixation, the surface receptors were immuno-stained with an anti-Flag antibody and labelled with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti mouse IgG. The fluorescence measured by a multi-label counter clearly indicates that the chimeric protein has a lower rate of internalization than the wild type receptor. The computed t<sub>1/2 </sub>was 12 and 33 min for &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR and &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s</sub>, respectively.</p>
            <fig id="F2">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 2</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Agonist-dependent internalization of &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s</sub></p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Agonist-dependent internalization of &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s</sub></b>. <b>A. </b>HEK293 cells stably expressing &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR or &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>were not treated (NT) or treated with isoproterenol for 5, 20 or 60 minutes to induce receptor internalization. The cells were then fixed in 4% formaldehyde and sequentially immuno-stained with anti-Flag and Alexa-Fluor 594 conjugated anti-mouse IgG. The disappearance of the fluorescence from the plasma membrane was monitored with an epifluorescence microscope. Scale bars, 20 &#956;m. <b>B. </b>Immunofluorescence showing the recruitment of both receptors into endocytic vesicles after 60 minutes of agonist treatment. In this case, cells were permeabilized with 0.2% NP-40 before the immunofluorescence reaction. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33258 (1 &#956;g/ml). Scale bars, 10 &#956;m. <b>C</b>. &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s</sub>and wild type &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR expressing cells were cultured on 96 multiwell plates and treated with isoproterenol for the indicated times (<it>abscissae</it>). Fixed cells were immuno-stained with Flag-antibody followed by Alexa-Fluor 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33258 (1 &#956;g/ml). Fluorescence was measured by a multi-label counter. Each point represents the mean of 4 different experiments performed in triplicate. Data are expressed as ratios of the relative fluorescence measured after immuno-staining with the Alexa-Fluor 488-labeled secondary antibody (RFUFitc) and following Hoechst staining of the same monolayers (RFUHoechst), as described in <it>Methods</it>. Data were fitted to an exponential decay equation of the form: y = a<sub>1 </sub>exp (-k t) + a<sub>0</sub>, where t is time in min, a<sub>1 </sub>and a<sub>0 </sub>are decaying and not decaying components of fluorescence, respectively, and k, the time constant, represents the inverse of the half-time (t<sub>1/2</sub>) of the disappearance of immunoreactivity from the cell surface.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1471-2121-9-56-2"/>
            </fig>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Inefficient recycling of internalized &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s</sub></p>
            </st>
            <p>To investigate whether the fusion of &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR to G protein &#945;-subunit also affects the recycling processes of the receptor, we used the same technical approach used for the internalization studies. First, HEK293/&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR or HEK293/&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>cells were exposed to 1 &#956;M isoproterenol for 5 hours to induce the maximal agonist-mediated internalization, as shown in figure <figr fid="F2">2C</figr>. Then we added the antagonist propranolol and incubated the cells for an additional hour, to allow the cell surface recovery of the receptors. Finally, an immunofluorescence assay was performed to visualize the recycling of epitope-tagged receptors via fluorescence microscopy (fig. <figr fid="F3">3A</figr>). Flag-epitopes immuno-staining revealed that, after 5 hours of incubation with isoproterenol, both receptors disappeared from the cell surface (fig. <figr fid="F3">3A</figr> panels b,b'). However, following an additional hour of incubation with the antagonist propranolol, native &#946;<sub>2 </sub>AR was almost completely returned to the cell surface, in sharp contrast with the &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>protein, which showed only a slight plasma membrane redistribution (fig. <figr fid="F3">3A</figr> panels c,c'). The inability of the chimeric receptor to recycle back to the plasma membrane was also confirmed by a fluorimetric assay performed to estimate the cell surface recovery of receptors upon antagonist incubation (fig. <figr fid="F3">3B</figr>). HEK293/&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR or HEK293/&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>cells were cultured on 96 multiwell plates and exposed to isoproterenol (1 &#956;M) for 5 hours. The agonist-mediated recruitment of receptors to intracellular compartments was stopped by the addition of propranolol (1 &#956;M) for increasing times, after which an immunofluorescence assay was performed to visualize the surface receptors (fig. <figr fid="F3">3B</figr>). At each time point, the cell surface recovery of either epitope-tagged &#946;<sub>2 </sub>AR or &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>was evaluated by the measurement of cell surface fluorescence by a multi-label counter. As shown in figure <figr fid="F3">3B</figr>, upon addition of the antagonist, the wild type receptor rapidly relocalized to the plasma membrane, in a time-dependent fashion. Approximately 50% of internalized &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR returned to the plasma membrane within 15 minutes, thus showing a fast component of recycling. Over this time, the further exposure of cells to antagonist favoured a nearly complete recycling of &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR by a slow component. As expected, the difference in the recycling rates between fused and non-fused receptors was dramatic. In fact, the fluorimetric measurement performed on cells expressing the &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>resulted in a slow as well as modest relocalization of receptors to the plasma membrane, and no significant recycling of the fusion protein was observed until after 60 minutes of antagonist treatment. Moreover, to exclude the membrane exposure of newly synthesized receptors from analysis, we also performed the same experiments in the presence of cycloheximide (CHX), a protein synthesis inhibitor. Under this condition, we observed that the recovery of the wild type receptor occurred by both recycling (fast component) and resynthesis (slow component). In contrast, the recovery of the fused receptor occurred only by new synthesis.</p>
            <fig id="F3">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 3</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Antagonist-mediated recycling of internalized &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR and&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s</sub></p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Antagonist-mediated recycling of internalized &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR and&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s</sub></b>. <b>A. </b>Cells stably expressing the &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR or the fusion protein &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>were treated (panels b, b', c, c') or not (panels a, a') with the agonist isoproterenol to induce complete receptor internalization. The agonist-mediated endocytosis was stopped by the addition of the antagonist propranolol for 60 minutes (panels c,c'). Fixed cells were then processed by fluorescence microscopy for membrane immuno-localization of Flag-tagged receptors, as described in <it>Methods</it>. Scale bars, 20 &#956;m. <b>B</b>. Cells expressing wild type or fusion protein receptor were incubated with 1 &#956;M isoproterenol for 5 hours to induce maximal internalization. Reversal of internalization was initiated by adding 1 &#956;M propranolol, and cells were fixed and subjected to immuno-staining with Flag-antibody and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti mouse IgG, at the indicated times, to detect the recovery of the cell surface receptors. Data (means of 3 experiments) are reported as the percent of the control (not stimulated) receptor immunoreactivity. The same experiment was performed in the absence (control) or presence of cycloheximide (CHX).</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1471-2121-9-56-3"/>
            </fig>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>and &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR co-localization with endocytosed transferrin</p>
            </st>
            <p>In order to investigate the failure of the chimeric receptor to recycle back to the plasma membrane in more detail, we compared the agonist-mediated sub-cellular localization of &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR and &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>receptors with that of endocytosed transferrin, a well-established marker of early and rapid recycling endosomes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>. The extent of co-localization between endocytosed transferrin and either native or chimeric receptors was examined by dual-label confocal microscopy (fig. <figr fid="F4">4A</figr>). As indicated by the <it>yellow </it>spots in the merged panel of figure <figr fid="F4">4A</figr>, most of the wild type &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR co-localized with the tracer transferrin, consistent with the typical rapid recycling of the &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR, whereas &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945; trafficked through transferrin-positive endosomal compartments, with an apparent lower grade compared to the wild type receptor. The fraction of vesicles showing transferrin-receptor co-localization was approximately 43% and 37% for the wild type and chimeric receptors, respectively (fig. <figr fid="F4">4B</figr>). This slight difference could be explained by the different kinetics of internalization displayed by the two receptors (fig. <figr fid="F2">2</figr>). As the above experiment demonstrated, 30 minutes corresponds to the agonist-exposure time at which &#946;<sub>2 </sub>AR, but not &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>receptor, shows maximal agonist-mediated internalization. Thus, the resistance to agonist-induced endocytosis showed by the fusion protein could also result in a different kinetic rate of transfer into and out of specific vesicles, without, however, changing its endosomal targeting. Taken together, these data support the hypothesis that the failure of &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>to undergo recycling is not linked to it sorting into endosomal compartments distinct from those that efficiently translate their cargo to the plasma membrane.</p>
            <fig id="F4">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 4</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>and &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR co-localization with endocytosed transferrin</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>and &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR co-localization with endocytosed transferrin</b>. <b>A. </b>The cells were incubated for 30 min with 100 &#956;M Alexa-Fluor 488 conjugated transferrin, a marker of early and recycling endosomes, and with 1 &#956;M isoproterenol for another 30 minutes. The samples were then washed, fixed and immuno-stained with antibody against Flag-epitopes, as described in <it>Methods</it>. The sub-cellular distribution and co-localization of both receptors with transferrin were revealed by confocal microscopy. The data are representative images from three independent experiments. <it>Red</it>, Flag-tagged receptor Alexa-Fluor 594 stained; <it>Green</it>, Alexa-Fluor 488 conjugated transferrin. In the merged images, numerous <it>yellow </it>vesicular spots, corresponding to the co-localization between internalized receptors and transferrin, are visualized. Scale bars, 10 &#956;m. <b>B</b>. The graph indicates the fraction of endocytic vesicles in which internalized receptors co-localized with the Alexa-Fluor 488 conjugated transferrin. Error bars represents the S.D. of data collected from multiple fields (<it>n </it>= 6) from 4 independent experiments.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1471-2121-9-56-4"/>
            </fig>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>and wild type receptor are targeted to the same endocytic vesicles</p>
            </st>
            <p>The experiments reported above do not exclude the possibility that, following agonist-mediated internalization, &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>and wild type &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR may traffic through similar endosomal compartments. To better understand this, we carried out experiments in which the endocytic trafficking of &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptors was analyzed in a co-expression system using a different tagged version of the native receptor.</p>
            <p>HEK293/&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>cells were transiently transfected with an amino-terminus HA-tagged &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR (HA-&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR), were incubated with or without 1 &#956;M isoproterenol for 5 hours to induce maximal internalization without affecting the recycling of the native receptor, were fixed, and were then subjected to confocal microscopy. In the absence of agonist stimulation, the immunoreactivity of Flag-&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s</sub>, as well as that HA-&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR, was typically localized at the plasma membrane. In response to agonist, each receptor redistributed from the cell surface to a population of cytoplasmic vesicles that resulted in complete overlapping in the merged colour images (fig. <figr fid="F5">5</figr>). These results, in addition to the transferrin co-localization experiments, confirm that the fusion of the G protein &#945;-subunit to the wild type &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR does not target the chimeric receptor to endosomal compartments distinct from those observed for the wild type protein. Next, using the same experimental strategy, we also examined whether or not the inability of the chimeric receptor to recycle back was affected by the presence of the wild type receptor.</p>
            <fig id="F5">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 5</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Dual-localization of co-expressed &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptors by confocal microscopy</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Dual-localization of co-expressed &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptors by confocal microscopy</b>. HEK293 cells stably expressing Flag-tagged &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>receptor were transiently transfected with a HA-tagged &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR construct to obtain the co-expression of the two receptors in the same cell. Cells were treated (Agonist) or not (Control) with 1 &#956;M isoproterenol for 5 hours, fixed and subjected to indirect immunofluorescence analysis as described in <it>Methods</it>, and then visualized by confocal microscopy. Co-localization of HA-&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR (Alexa-Fluor 488 staining; <it>green</it>) with Flag-&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>(Alexa-Fluor 594 staining; <it>red</it>) is shown in the merged colour image by <it>yellow </it>staining. Photographs represent a typical situation observed in 4 independent experiments. Scale bars, 10 &#956;m.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1471-2121-9-56-5"/>
            </fig>
            <p>Analysis by epifluorescence microscopy of HEK293/&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>cells transiently expressing the wild type &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR, and treated for five hours with 1 &#956;M isoproterenol, confirmed that both receptors were recruited into the same endocytic vesicles (fig. <figr fid="F6">6</figr>). However, when the antagonist propranolol was added to stop receptor internalization, we observed an almost complete recovery of the wild type receptor on the cell surface, whereas the &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>was entirely retained in the intracellular vesicles. Moreover, an intracellular pool of both receptors continued to co-localize, probably in correspondence of compartments that drive them to a common degradative pathway.</p>
            <fig id="F6">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 6</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Dual-localization of co-expressed &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptors after antagonist-mediated recycling</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Dual-localization of co-expressed &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptors after antagonist-mediated recycling</b>. HEK293 cells stably expressing Flag-&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>receptor were transiently transfected with HA-&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR construct. After 48 hours, receptor internalization was induced by incubating cells with 1 &#956;M isoproterenol for 5 hours. 1 &#956;M propranolol was added (Agonist + Antagonist) or not (Agonist) for a further 60 minutes to stop receptor endocytosis. Fixed and immuno-stained cells were subjected to epifluorescence microscopy, as described in <it>Methods</it>, to visualize the sub-cellular localization of HA-&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR (Alexa-Fluor 594 staining; <it>red</it>) and Flag-&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;s (Alexa-Fluor 488 staining; <it>green</it>). Scale bars, 10 &#956;m. Note that the antagonist allows the membrane return of the wild type receptor but not of the chimeric protein. Photographs represent the typical situation observed in 4 independent experiments.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1471-2121-9-56-6"/>
            </fig>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Conclusion</p>
         </st>
         <p>In this study, we have investigated the effect of a C-terminally tethered G protein &#945;-subunit on the recycling rate and post-endocytic fate of the &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR receptor. We observed two important differences between the fused and non-fused receptors.</p>
         <p>The first is a substantial reduction in the internalization rate of the receptor-G&#945; fusion protein compared to the native &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptor (fig. <figr fid="F2">2</figr>). Therefore, depending on the extent to which intracellular recruitment in a given cell contributes to the attenuation of receptor responsiveness, these results suggest that &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>may be less susceptible to desensitization. This also explains previous reports indicating an increased resistance to desensitization and an enhanced anti-proliferative effect of isoproterenol in S49 cells transfected with this type of fusion protein <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>The reduced rate of internalization was apparently not due to a divergent process of endocytosis, since &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>was targeted to the same endosomal compartment where the wild type receptor was translated (fig. <figr fid="F4">4</figr>, <figr fid="F5">5</figr>, <figr fid="F6">6</figr>). This might reflect a reduced ability of the fused receptor to interact with G protein receptor kinases (GRKs), since receptor-G&#945; fusion proteins were found less capable of interacting with G&#946;&#947; subunits, which play a crucial role in recruiting GRKs to the receptor <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>. A detailed study on the ability of &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>to undergo GRK-mediated phosphorylation and &#946;-arrestin docking will obviously be necessary to address such questions.</p>
         <p>The second and more remarkable difference between G&#945;-fused and non-fused receptor is the total inability of &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945; to undergo recycling, which makes endocytosis an essentially irreversible process for the fusion protein. In fact, the fast CHX-insensitive component of receptor recovery to the cell surface was absent in cell expressing the fused receptor and no recovery of fusion protein was observed in cells treated with CHX (fig. <figr fid="F3">3</figr>), suggesting that fusion proteins coming slowly back to the membrane after internalization are only those derived from <it>de novo </it>protein synthesis (fig. <figr fid="F3">3</figr>). Direct labelling in pulse-chase experiments will be necessary to verify such possibility. Moreover, multiplexed immunofluorescence staining of differentially tagged fused and wild type receptors co-transfected in the same cell clearly showed that, unlike native receptors, the fused protein is selectively retained in an intracellular compartment following the reversal of internalization (fig. <figr fid="F6">6</figr>).</p>
         <p>It is known that, upon agonist activation, &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptor and the G&#945;-subunit dissociate and leave the plasma membrane to traffic through distinct endosomal compartments, both of which result in recycling <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp>. Moreover, unlike &#946;<sub>2 </sub>AR, G&#945;<sub>s </sub>does not colocalize with internalized transferrin, indicating that it does not traffic into common recycling endosomes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>Thus, it is reasonable to suppose that, in the &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945; construct, the receptor sequence played a critical role in dictating the intracellular trafficking of the fusion protein in response to agonist. On the other hand, the undissociable covalent bond that ties together the two sequences appears to be a sufficient modification to block the natural recycling mechanisms of both proteins. While more investigations will be necessary to identify the exact nature of the endocytic vesicles that irreversibly trap the fusion protein inside the cell, our study allows us to pinpoint which step of receptor endocytosis is most crucially dependent on the physical separation of receptor from G&#945;. The lack of dissociation, in fact, can reduce the efficiency but does not prevent the initial phase of receptor endocytosis. It does however disrupt the post-endocytic fate of both receptor and G&#945; subunit.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Methods</p>
         </st>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Materials</p>
            </st>
            <p>Materials came from the following sources: cell culture media, fetal bovine serum, G418 and Lipofectamine were from Invitrogen. Isoproterenol, propranolol, anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody (M1 clone), anti-HA polyclonal antibody and Hoechst 33258 were from Sigma. Phospho-p44/42 MAPK rabbit monoclonal antibody was from Cell Signalling Technology. Alexa-Fluor 488-conjugated transferrin, and antibodies Alexa-Fluor 488 and Alexa-Fluor 594 goat anti-mouse IgG, were from Molecular Probes. Nitrocellulose transfer membrane was from Schleicher&amp;Schuell. Enhanced chemiluminescent substrate (ECL) for detection of HRP was from PIERCE.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Plasmids</p>
            </st>
            <p>The construction of full-length cDNA encoding the Flag-tagged &#946;2AR-G&#945;s fusion protein was described previously <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>The amino terminal Flag tagged wild receptor was obtained in a similar way. Briefly, the cleavable prolactin signal peptide tethered to the Flag epitope (DYKDDDDK) was added immediately before the Gly<sup>2 </sup>in &#946;<sub>2 </sub>AR by PCR-based strategies and cloned in a pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen).</p>
            <p>The cDNA encoding for 3HA-&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR was obtained by the annealing of two synthetic oligonucleotides containing the sequences of three sequential modules of the influenza hemagglutinin HA epitope (AYPYDVPDYA), and was cloned into pcDNA3 vector. Then, by PCR, we obtained the cDNA encoding for the &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR deprived of the Met initiator codon, which was subcloned into the vector, in frame with the 3 &#215; HA epitope.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Cell Culture and Transfection</p>
            </st>
            <p>Human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells stably expressing the wild type &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR or chimeric protein &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s </sub>were generated as described previously <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>. The total number of expressed receptors was measured in membranes prepared from the transfected cells using radioligand binding assays, as described previously <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>. The levels of receptor expression were 15 and 10.8 pmol/mg in cells expressing wild type &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR and &#946;<sub>2</sub>AR-G&#945;<sub>s</sub>, respectively.</p>
            <p>Cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; GIBCO) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS; GIBCO), 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 &#956;g/ml streptomycin sulphate, and 200 &#956;g/ml G418 (GIBCO) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO<sub>2 </sub>at 37&#176;C.</p>
            <p>For transient transfections, cells cultured in 35-mm tissue culture dishes were transfected with 0.3 &#956;g of pcDNA3/HA-&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR and 0.7 &#956;g of empty vector using Lipofectamine (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cells were allowed to express the transfected gene for 48 hrs before harvesting.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Immunofluorescence</p>
            </st>
            <p>Cells were grown on 35-mm tissue culture dishes and following the various treatments were fixed with 4% buffered formaldehyde for 20 minutes. If necessary, fixed cells were permeabilized with 0.2% Nonidet P-40 (NP-40) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 10 min to assure the accessibility of intracellular and intravesicular antigens. For the detection of epitope-tagged receptors, anti-Flag mouse monoclonal antibody was added in blocking buffer (1% BSA) for 50 min at room temperature (r.t.) followed by Alexa-Fluor 594 conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Molecular Probes). In dual staining experiments, co-localization of Flag-tagged receptors and HA-tagged receptors in a single cell line, was performed by incubating cells with anti-Flag and anti-HA rabbit polyclonal antibody (Sigma).</p>
            <p>Stained specimens were examined by conventional epifluorescence microscope (Olympus BX51; Tokyo, Japan) or confocal microscope.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy</p>
            </st>
            <p>Fluorescently labelled preparations were also observed by a confocal fluorescent imaging system using the confocal laser scanning microscope LEICA TCS 4D (Leach Instruments, Heidelberg, Germany) supplemented with an Argon/Kripton laser and equipped with 40 &#215; 1.00&#8211;0.5 and 100 &#215; 1.3&#8211;0.6 oil immersion lenses. The excitation/emission wavelengths employed were 488 nm/510 nm, and 568 nm/590 nm for specific Alexa-Fluor labelling. Confocal sections were acquired at intervals of 0.5 &#956;m from the middle to the bottom toward the cells, and a 3D reconstruction image of the fluorescent signal was obtained. In double staining experiments, confocal sections for both fluorescent signals were taken simultaneously, the 3D reconstruction images were recorded, and merged images of the two signals were obtained using confocal microscope software.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Receptor Internalization Assays</p>
            </st>
            <p>Cells, cultured on 96 multiwell plates (Nunc) until they reached confluence, were stimulated with 1 &#956;M isoproterenol (Sigma) at 37&#176;C for different times to drive agonist-induced internalization. At the end of the time-course, cells were immediately fixed with 4% buffered formaldehyde for 20 min, incubated in blocking buffer for 30 min and immuno-stained for 50 min with anti-FLAG mouse monoclonal antibody (Sigma), followed by Alexa-Fluor 488 conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Molecular Probes). Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33258 (1 &#956;g/ml). Fluorescence was measured by a multi-label counter (Victor 2; Wallac), setting excitation and emission filters as follows: &#955;<sub>ex </sub>= 485/&#955;<sub>em </sub>= 535, and &#955;<sub>ex </sub>= 355/&#955;<sub>em </sub>= 460 for Alexa-Fluor 488 and Hoechst, respectively. Each point was performed in triplicate and the receptor internalization was monitored in relationship to the decrease of fluorescence from the plasma membrane.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Receptor Recycling Assays</p>
            </st>
            <p>For recycling studies, cells cultured on 96 multiwell plates were incubated with 1 &#956;M isoproterenol for 5 hrs to induce maximal receptor internalization. Reversal of internalization was initiated by adding the antagonist, 1 &#956;M Propranolol (Sigma), for different times. In other experiments, 50 &#956;g/ml cycloheximide (CHX; Sigma) was added during the last 2 hrs of agonist treatment. At the end of the time-course, the cells were fixed and subjected to immunofluorence followed by fluorimetry analysis as above.</p>
            <p>Receptor recycling from the endocytic pathway was estimated by assaying the recovery of immunoreactive epitopes at the cell surface that were accessible by monoclonal antibody.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Localization of Receptor with Endocytosed Transferrin</p>
            </st>
            <p>In order to estimate the degree of co-localization of the receptor with endocytosed transferrin, cells were incubated for 30 min at 37&#176;C in culture medium containing 100 &#956;M Alexa-Fluor 488-conjugated transferrin (Molecular Probes), and then 1 &#956;M isoproterenol was added for an additional 30 min.</p>
            <p>Next, cells were washed twice in pre-warmed PBS to remove non-internalized transferrin and were subjected to immunofluorescence as above. Briefly, fixed cells were permeabilized and immuno-stained for detection of Flag-tagged receptors. Dual-label fluorescence microscopy was performed as described above.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Immunoblotting for Phospho p42/44 MAP Kinases</p>
            </st>
            <p>Cells were first sensitized by incubating with the agonist isoproterenol (1 &#956;M) for different times and were then dissolved in Laemmli's sample buffer. Samples were electrophoresed through a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel (SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher&amp;Schuell). Blots were incubated in blocking buffer (5% w/v non fat dry-milk, 0,1% Tween-20 in Tris buffered saline) for 1 hrs at r.t., followed by incubation overnight at 4&#176;C with Phospho-p44/42 MAP kinases rabbit monoclonal antibody (Cell Signalling Technology), which detects endogenous levels of p42 and p44 MAP kinases (ERK1/2) when phosphorylated at Thr202 and Tyr204, respectively. Immunoreactive bands probed with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti rabbit IgG antibody were visualized by chemiluminescence (ECL; PIERCE), according to the manufacturer's instructions.</p>
            <p>Samples were normalized for protein content by reprobing blots with an alpha-tubulin monoclonal antibody (Sigma).</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Competing interests</p>
         </st>
         <p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Authors' contributions</p>
         </st>
         <p>MGDC designed experiments and wrote the manuscript. In addition, MGDC performed Receptor Internalization/Recycling Assays. EB performed cell culture, transfection, immunoblotting and immunofluorescence experiments. IC constructed the vector encoding for 3HA-&#946;<sub>2</sub>AR. AS analyzed the confocal experiments. AF and CP contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. PM and EM supervised and provided guidance and critical input into the study. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <ack>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Acknowledgements</p>
            </st>
            <p>We thank Dr. T. Costa for helpful discussions and help with the preparation of the manuscript. We thank S. Quaresima and A. Onori for the excellent technical assistance. We thank Dr. R.G. Ruscitti for her precious assistance. We would like to thank Dr. Fulvio Florenzano for valuable confocal microscopy assistance. The financial support of Telethon &#8211; Italy (Grant no. D129 to Dr. Elisabetta Mattei) is gratefully acknowledged. Dr. M.G. Di Certo is a recipient of a fellowship supported by Regione Lazio fundings for "Sviluppo della Ricerca sul Cervello".</p>
         </sec>
      </ack>
      <refgrp>
         <bibl id="B1">
            <title>
               <p>Regulation of receptor trafficking by GRKs and arrestins</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Moore</snm>
                  <fnm>CAC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Milano</snm>
                  <fnm>SK</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Benovic</snm>
                  <fnm>JL</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Annu Rev Phisiol</source>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
            <volume>69</volume>
            <fpage>451</fpage>
            <lpage>82</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1146/annurev.physiol.69.022405.154712</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B2">
            <title>
               <p>Evolving concepts in G Protein-coupled receptor endocytosis: the role in receptor desensitisation and signalling</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ferguson</snm>
                  <fnm>SSG</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Pharmacol Rev</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>53</volume>
            <fpage>1</fpage>
            <lpage>24</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11171937</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B3">
            <title>
               <p>G protein-coupled receptor kinases</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lefkowitz</snm>
                  <fnm>RJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Cell</source>
            <pubdate>1993</pubdate>
            <volume>74</volume>
            <fpage>409</fpage>
            <lpage>412</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0092-8674(93)80042-D</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8394218</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B4">
            <title>
               <p>The role of receptor kinases and arrestins in G protein-coupled receptor regulation</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Krupnick</snm>
                  <fnm>JG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Benovic</snm>
                  <fnm>JL</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol</source>
            <pubdate>1998</pubdate>
            <volume>38</volume>
            <fpage>289</fpage>
            <lpage>319</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.38.1.289</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9597157</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B5">
            <title>
               <p>Role of &#946;-arrestin in mediating agonist-promoted G protein-coupled receptor internalization</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ferguson</snm>
                  <fnm>SSG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Downey</snm>
                  <fnm>WE</fnm>
                  <suf>III</suf>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Colapietro</snm>
                  <fnm>AM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Barak</snm>
                  <fnm>LS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Menard</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Caron</snm>
                  <fnm>MG</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Science</source>
            <pubdate>1996</pubdate>
            <volume>271</volume>
            <fpage>363</fpage>
            <lpage>366</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.271.5247.363</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8553074</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B6">
            <title>
               <p>Sequestration and recycling of &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptors permit resensitization</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pippig</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Andexinger</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lohse</snm>
                  <fnm>MJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Mol Pharmacol</source>
            <pubdate>1995</pubdate>
            <volume>47</volume>
            <fpage>666</fpage>
            <lpage>676</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">7723728</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B7">
            <title>
               <p>New molecular and structural determinants involved in &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptor desensitization and sequestration: delineation using chimeric &#946;<sub>3</sub>/&#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptors</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jockers</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Da Silva</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Strosberg</snm>
                  <fnm>AD</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bouvier</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Marullo</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Biol Chem</source>
            <pubdate>1996</pubdate>
            <volume>271</volume>
            <fpage>9355</fpage>
            <lpage>9362</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.271.16.9355</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8621600</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B8">
            <title>
               <p>Distinct regulation of &#946;<sub>1</sub>- and &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptors in Chinese hamster fibroblasts</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Suzuki</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nguyen</snm>
                  <fnm>CT</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nantel</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bonin</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Valiquette</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Frielle</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bouvier</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Mol Pharmacol</source>
            <pubdate>1992</pubdate>
            <volume>41</volume>
            <fpage>542</fpage>
            <lpage>548</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">1347641</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B9">
            <title>
               <p>Differences in endosomal targeting of human &#946;<sub>1</sub>-and &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptors following clathrin-mediated endocytosis</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Liang</snm>
                  <fnm>W</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Curran</snm>
                  <fnm>PK</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hoang</snm>
                  <fnm>Q</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Moreland</snm>
                  <fnm>RT</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fishman</snm>
                  <fnm>PH</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Cell Sci</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>117</volume>
            <fpage>723</fpage>
            <lpage>734</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1242/jcs.00878</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14734649</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B10">
            <title>
               <p>The cytoplasmic tails of protease-activated receptor-1 and substance P receptor specify sorting to lysosomes versus recycling</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Trejo</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Coughlin</snm>
                  <fnm>SR</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Biol Chem</source>
            <pubdate>1999</pubdate>
            <volume>274</volume>
            <fpage>2216</fpage>
            <lpage>2224</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.274.4.2216</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9890984</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B11">
            <title>
               <p>Cellular trafficking of G protein-coupled receptor/b-arrestin endocytic complexes</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zhang</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Barak</snm>
                  <fnm>LS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Anborgh</snm>
                  <fnm>PH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Laporte</snm>
                  <fnm>SA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Caron</snm>
                  <fnm>MG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ferguson</snm>
                  <fnm>SSG</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Biol Chem</source>
            <pubdate>1999</pubdate>
            <volume>274</volume>
            <fpage>10999</fpage>
            <lpage>11006</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.274.16.10999</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10196181</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B12">
            <title>
               <p>Differential regulation of &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic and angiotensin II type1A receptor trafficking and resensitization: Role of carboxyl-terminal domains</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Anborgh</snm>
                  <fnm>PH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dale</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Seachrist</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ferguson</snm>
                  <fnm>SSG</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Mol Endocrinol</source>
            <pubdate>2000</pubdate>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <fpage>2040</fpage>
            <lpage>2053</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1210/me.14.12.2040</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11117533</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B13">
            <title>
               <p>A kinas-regulated PDZ-domain interaction controls endocytic sorting of the &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptor</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cao</snm>
                  <fnm>TT</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Deacon</snm>
                  <fnm>HW</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Reczek</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bretscher</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>von Zastrow</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Nature</source>
            <pubdate>1999</pubdate>
            <volume>401</volume>
            <fpage>286</fpage>
            <lpage>290</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/45816</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10499588</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B14">
            <title>
               <p>Ligand-regulated internalization and recycling of human &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptors between the plasma membrane and endosomes containing transferrin receptors</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>von Zastrow</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kobilka</snm>
                  <fnm>BK</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Biol Chem</source>
            <pubdate>1992</pubdate>
            <volume>267</volume>
            <fpage>3530</fpage>
            <lpage>3538</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">1371121</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B15">
            <title>
               <p>Internal trafficking and surface mobility of a functionally intact &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptor-green fluorescent protein conjugate</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Barak</snm>
                  <fnm>LS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ferguson</snm>
                  <fnm>SSG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zhang</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Martenson</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Meyer</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Caron</snm>
                  <fnm>MG</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Mol Pharmacol</source>
            <pubdate>1997</pubdate>
            <volume>51</volume>
            <fpage>177</fpage>
            <lpage>184</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9203621</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B16">
            <title>
               <p>Visualization of agonist-induced sequestration and down-regulation of a green fluorescent protein-tagged &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptor</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kallal</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gagnon</snm>
                  <fnm>AW</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Penn</snm>
                  <fnm>RB</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Benovic</snm>
                  <fnm>JL</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Biol Chem</source>
            <pubdate>1998</pubdate>
            <volume>273</volume>
            <fpage>322</fpage>
            <lpage>328</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.273.1.322</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9417083</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B17">
            <title>
               <p>Real-time visualization of a fluorescent G&#945;s: dissociation of the activated G protein from plasma membrane</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Yu</snm>
                  <fnm>JZ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rasenick</snm>
                  <fnm>MM</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Mol Pharmacol</source>
            <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
            <volume>61</volume>
            <fpage>352</fpage>
            <lpage>359</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1124/mol.61.2.352</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11809860</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B18">
            <title>
               <p>Live cell imaging of G<sub>s </sub>and the &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptor demonstrates that both as and &#946;&#947; internalize upon stimulation and exhibit similar trafficking patterns that differ from that of the &#946;<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptor</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hynes</snm>
                  <fnm>TR</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mervine</snm>
                  <fnm>SM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Yost</snm>
                  <fnm>EA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sabo</snm>
                  <fnm>JL</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Berlot</snm>
                  <fnm>CH</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Biol Chem</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>279</volume>
            <fpage>44101</fpage>
            <lpage>44112</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.M405151200</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15297467</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B19">
            <title>
               <p>Promiscuous coupling at receptor-G&#945; fusion proteins</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Molinari</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ambrosio</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Riitano</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sbraccia</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gr&#242;</snm>
                  <fnm>MC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Costa</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Biol Chem</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>278</volume>
            <fpage>15778</fpage>
            <lpage>15788</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.M300731200</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12598520</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B20">
            <title>
               <p>Essential role for G protein-coupled receptor endocytosis in the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Daaka</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Luttrell</snm>
                  <fnm>LM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ahn</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Della Rocca</snm>
                  <fnm>GJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ferguson</snm>
                  <fnm>SS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Caron</snm>
                  <fnm>MG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lefkowitz</snm>
                  <fnm>RJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Biol Chem</source>
            <pubdate>1998</pubdate>
            <volume>273</volume>
            <fpage>685</fpage>
            <lpage>688</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.273.2.685</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9422717</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B21">
            <title>
               <p>Regulation of tyrosine kinase cascades by G protein-coupled receptors</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Luttrell</snm>
                  <fnm>LM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Daaka</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lefkowitz</snm>
                  <fnm>RJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Curr Opin Cell Biol</source>
            <pubdate>1999</pubdate>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <fpage>177</fpage>
            <lpage>183</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0955-0674(99)80023-4</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10209148</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B22">
            <title>
               <p>Two distinct subpopulations of endosomes involved in membrane recycling and transport to lysosomes</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Schmid</snm>
                  <fnm>SL</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fuchs</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Male</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mellman</snm>
                  <fnm>I</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Cell</source>
            <pubdate>1988</pubdate>
            <volume>52</volume>
            <fpage>73</fpage>
            <lpage>83</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0092-8674(88)90532-6</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">3345561</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B23">
            <title>
               <p>Antagonist-dependent and -independent steps in the mechanism of adrenergic receptor internalization</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>von Zastrow</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kobilka</snm>
                  <fnm>BK</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Biol Chem</source>
            <pubdate>1994</pubdate>
            <volume>269</volume>
            <fpage>18448</fpage>
            <lpage>52</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">7518433</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B24">
            <title>
               <p>Activation of a beta 2-adrenergic receptor/Gs alpha fusion protein elicits a desensitization-resistant cAMP signal capable of inhibiting proliferation of two cancer cell lines</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bertin</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jockers</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Strosberg</snm>
                  <fnm>AD</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Marullo</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Receptors Channels</source>
            <pubdate>1997</pubdate>
            <volume>5</volume>
            <fpage>41</fpage>
            <lpage>51</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">9272575</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B25">
            <title>
               <p>&#946;-Adrenergic Receptor stimulation promotes G&#945; s internalization through lipid rafts: a study in living cells</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Allen</snm>
                  <fnm>JA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Yu</snm>
                  <fnm>JZ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Donati</snm>
                  <fnm>RJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rasenick</snm>
                  <fnm>MM</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Mol Pharmacol</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>67</volume>
            <fpage>1493</fpage>
            <lpage>1504</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1124/mol.104.008342</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15703379</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
      </refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>
