<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?journal=bmcsurg&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Surgery - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcsurg/</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by BMC Surgery</description>
        <dc:date>2009-10-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/7/13" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/7/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/3/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/9/16" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/9/12" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/9/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/4/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/9/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/9/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/7/20" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/7/13">
        <title>The use of a silicone-coated acrylic vaginal stent in McIndoe vaginoplasty and review of the literature concerning silicone-based vaginal stents: a case report</title>
        <description>Background:
Mc Indoe vaginoplasty is one of the mostly performed surgical interventions in Mullerian agenesis.Case presentationsWe present our experience on the use of a new designed vaginal stent that was coated with silicone in two mullerian agenesis cases who had Mc Indoe vaginoplasty. Both full thickness and splitt thickness skin graft were used with the stent. No graft loss or hyperthrophic scarring which may be seen at the apex of neovagina after Mc Indoe vaginoplasty was observed during the follow-up period and adequate neovaginal depth were obtained in both of the patients.
Conclusion:
We think that the incorporation of silicone to a vaginal stent for postoperative wound care improves skin graft take and decreases a possible constriction band formation in neovagina.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/7/13</link>
                <dc:creator>Ayhan Coskun</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yusuf Coban</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mehmet Vardar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>A. Dalay</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Surgery 2007, 7:13</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-07-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2482-7-13</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Surgery</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2482</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-07-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/7/11">
        <title>Epiploic appendagitis - clinical characteristics of an uncommon surgical diagnosis
</title>
        <description>Background:
Epiploic appendagitis (EA) is a rare cause of focal abdominal pain in otherwise healthy patients with mild or absent secondary signs of abdominal pathology. It can mimick diverticulitis or appendicitis on clinical exam. The diagnosis of EA is very infrequent, due in part to low or absent awareness among general surgeons. The objective of this work was to review the authors&apos; experience and describe the clinical presentation of EA.
Methods:
All patients diagnosed with EA between January 2004 and December 2006 at an urban surgical emergency room were retrospectively reviewed by two authors in order to share the authors&apos; experience with this rare diagnosis. The operations were performed by two surgeons. Pathological examinations of specimens were performed by a single pathologist. A review of clinical presentation is additionally undertaken.
Results:
Ten patients (3 females and 7 males, average age: 44.6 years, range: 27&#8211;76 years) were diagnosed with symptomatic EA. Abdominal pain was the leading symptom, the pain being localized in the left (8 patients, 80 %) and right (2 patients, 20%) lower quadrant. All patients were afebrile, and with the exception of one patient, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were not present. CRP was slightly increased (mean: 1.2 mg/DL) in three patients (33%). Computed tomography findings specific for EA were present in five patients. Treatment was laparoscopic excision (n = 8), excision via conventional laparotomy (n = 1) and conservative therapy (n = 1).
Conclusion:
In patients with localized, sharp, acute abdominal pain not associated with other symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, fever or atypical laboratory values, the diagnosis of EA should be considered. Although infrequent up to date, with the increase of primary abdominal CT scans and ultrasound EA may well be diagnosed more frequently in the future.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/7/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Michael Sand</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marcos Gelos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Falk Bechara</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Sand</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Till Wiese</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lars Steinstraesser</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Benno Mann</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Surgery 2007, 7:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2482-7-11</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Surgery</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2482</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-07-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/3/2">
        <title>Surgical physiology of inguinal hernia repair - a study of 200 cases</title>
        <description>Background:
Current inguinal hernia operations are generally based on anatomical considerations. Failures of such operations are due to lack of consideration of physiological aspects. Many patients with inguinal hernia are cured as a result of current techniques of operation, though factors that are said to prevent hernia formation are not restored. Therefore, the surgical physiology of inguinal canal needs to be reconsidered.
Methods:
A retrospective study is describer of 200 patients operated on for inguinal hernia under local anaesthesia by the author&apos;s technique of inguinal hernia repair.
Results:
The posterior wall of the inguinal canal was weak and without dynamic movement in all patients. Strong aponeurotic extensions were absent in the posterior wall. The muscle arch movement was lost or diminished in all patients. The movement of the muscle arch improved after it was sutured to the upper border of a strip of the external oblique aponeurosis (EOA). The newly formed posterior wall was kept physiologically dynamic by the additional muscle strength provided by external oblique muscle to the weakened muscles of the muscle arch.
Conclusions:
A physiologically dynamic and strong posterior inguinal wall, and the shielding and compression action of the muscles and aponeuroses around the inguinal canal are important factors that prevent hernia formation or hernia recurrence after repair. In addition, the squeezing and plugging action of the cremasteric muscle and binding effect of the strong cremasteric fascia, also play an important role in the prevention of hernia.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/3/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Mohan Desarda</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Surgery 2003, 3:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2003-04-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2482-3-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Surgery</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2482</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2003-04-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/9/16">
        <title>Internal sphincterotomy reduces postoperative pain after Milligan Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.</title>
        <description>Background:
Over the last few years, there has been increasing attention on surgical procedures to treat haemorrhoids. The Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy is still one of the most popular surgical treatments of haemorrhoids. The aim of the present work is to assess postoperative pain, together with other early and late complications, after Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy as we could observe in our experience before and after performing an internal sphincterotomy.
Methods:
from January 1980 to May 2007, we operated 850 patients, but only 699 patients (median age 53) were included in the present study because they satisfied our inclusion criteria. The patients were divided into two groups: all the patients operated on before 1995 (group A); all the patients operated on after 1995 (group B). Since 1995 an internal sphincterotomy of about 1 cm has been performed at the end of the procedure. The data concerning the complications of these two groups were compared. All the patients received a check-up at one and six months after operation and a telephone questionnaire three years after operation to evalue medium and long term results.
Results:
after one month 507 patients (72.5%) did not have any postoperative complication. Only 192 patients (27.46%) out of 699 presented postoperative complication and the most frequent one (23.03%) was pain. The number of patients who suffered from postoperative pain decreased significantly when performing internal sphincterotomy, going from 28.8% down to 10.45% (&#967;2: 10,880; p = 0,0001); 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 24.7 to 28.9 (group A) and 10.17 to 10.72 (group B). In 51 cases (7.29%) urinary retention was registered. Six cases of bleeding (0.85%) were registered. Medium and long term follow up did not show any difference among the two groups.
Conclusion:
internal sphincterotomy: reduces significantly pain only in the first postoperative period, but not in the medium-long term follow up; does not increase the incidence of continence impairment when performed; does not influence the incidence of the other postoperative complications especially as regard medium and long term results.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/9/16</link>
                <dc:creator>Giuseppe Diana</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Giovanni Guercio</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bianca Cudia</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Calogero Ricotta</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Surgery 2009, 9:16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2482-9-16</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Surgery</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2482</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/9/12">
        <title>Development of a clinical decision model for thyroid nodules</title>
        <description>Background:
Thyroid nodules represent a common problem brought to medical attention. Four to seven percent of the United States adult population (10&#8211;18 million people) has a palpable thyroid nodule, however the majority (&gt;95%) of thyroid nodules are benign. While, fine needle aspiration remains the most cost effective and accurate diagnostic tool for thyroid nodules in current practice, over 20% of patients undergoing FNA of a thyroid nodule have indeterminate cytology (follicular neoplasm) with associated malignancy risk prevalence of 20&#8211;30%. These patients require thyroid lobectomy/isthmusectomy purely for the purpose of attaining a definitive diagnosis. Given that the majority (70&#8211;80%) of these patients have benign surgical pathology, thyroidectomy in these patients is conducted principally with diagnostic intent. Clinical models predictive of malignancy risk are needed to support treatment decisions in patients with thyroid nodules in order to reduce morbidity associated with unnecessary diagnostic surgery.
Methods:
Data were analyzed from a completed prospective cohort trial conducted over a 4-year period involving 216 patients with thyroid nodules undergoing ultrasound (US), electrical impedance scanning (EIS) and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNA) prior to thyroidectomy. A Bayesian model was designed to predict malignancy in thyroid nodules based on multivariate dependence relationships between independent covariates. Ten-fold cross-validation was performed to estimate classifier error wherein the data set was randomized into ten separate and unique train and test sets consisting of a training set (90% of records) and a test set (10% of records). A receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) curve of these predictions and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to determine model robustness for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules.
Results:
Thyroid nodule size, FNA cytology, US and EIS characteristics were highly predictive of malignancy. Cross validation of the model created with Bayesian Network Analysis effectively predicted malignancy [AUC = 0.88 (95%CI: 0.82&#8211;0.94)] in thyroid nodules. The positive and negative predictive values of the model are 83% (95%CI: 76%&#8211;91%) and 79% (95%CI: 72%&#8211;86%), respectively.
Conclusion:
An integrated predictive decision model using Bayesian inference incorporating readily obtainable thyroid nodule measures is clinically relevant, as it effectively predicts malignancy in thyroid nodules. This model warrants further validation testing in prospective clinical trials.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/9/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Alexander Stojadinovic</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>George Peoples</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steven Libutti</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Leonard Henry</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Eberhardt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robin Howard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Gur</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eric Elster</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aviram Nissan</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Surgery 2009, 9:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-08-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2482-9-12</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Surgery</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2482</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-08-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/9/8">
        <title>Current practice of abdominal wall closure in elective surgery - Is there any consensus?</title>
        <description>Background:
Development of incisional hernia after open abdominal surgery remains a major cause of post-operative morbidity. The aim of this study was to determine the current practice of surgeons in terms of access to and closure of the abdominal cavity in elective open surgery.
Methods:
Twelve surgical departments of the INSECT-Trial group documented the following variables for 50 consecutive patients undergoing abdominal surgery: fascial closure techniques, applied suture materials, application of subcutaneous sutures, subcutaneous drains, methods for skin closure. Descriptive analysis was performed and consensus of treatment variables was categorized into four levels: Strong consensus &gt;95%, consensus 75&#8211;95%, overall agreement 50&#8211;75%, no consensus &lt;50%.
Results:
157 out of 599 patients were eligible for analysis (85 (54%) midline, 54 (35%) transverse incisions). After midline incisions the fascia was closed continuously in 55 patients (65%), using slowly absorbable (n = 47, 55%), braided (n = 32, 38%) sutures with a strength of 1 (n = 48, 57%). In the transverse setting the fascia was closed continuously in 39 patients (72%) with slowly absorbable (n = 22, 41%) braided sutures (n = 27, 50%) with a strength of 1 (n = 30, 56%).
Conclusion:
In the present evaluation midline incision was the most frequently applied access in elective open abdominal surgery. None of the treatments for abdominal wall closure (except skin closure in the midline group) is performed on a consensus level.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/9/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Nuh Rahbari</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Philip Knebel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Markus Diener</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christoph Seidlmayer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karsten Ridwelski</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hartmut Stoltzing</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christoph Seiler</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Surgery 2009, 9:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2482-9-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Surgery</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2482</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/4/15">
        <title>Pudendal nerve decompression in perineology : a case series</title>
        <description>Background:
Perineodynia (vulvodynia, perineal pain, proctalgia), anal and urinary incontinence are the main symptoms of the pudendal canal syndrome (PCS) or entrapment of the pudendal nerve. The first aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of bilateral pudendal nerve decompression (PND) on the symptoms of the PCS, on three clinical signs (abnormal sensibility, painful Alcock&apos;s canal, painful &quot;skin rolling test&quot;) and on two neurophysiological tests: electromyography (EMG) and pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies (PNTML). The second aim was to study the clinical value of the aforementioned clinical signs in the diagnosis of PCS.
Methods:
In this retrospective analysis, the studied sample comprised 74 female patients who underwent a bilateral PND between 1995 and 2002. To accomplish the first aim, the patients sample was compared before and at least one year after surgery by means of descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing. The second aim was achieved by means of a statistical comparison between the patient&apos;s group before the operation and a control group of 82 women without any of the following signs: prolapse, anal incontinence, perineodynia, dyschesia and history of pelvi-perineal surgery.
Results:
When bilateral PND was the only procedure done to treat the symptoms, the cure rates of perineodynia, anal incontinence and urinary incontinence were 8/14, 4/5 and 3/5, respectively. The frequency of the three clinical signs was significantly reduced. There was a significant reduction of anal and perineal PNTML and a significant increase of anal richness on EMG. The Odd Ratio of the three clinical signs in the diagnosis of PCS was 16,97 (95% CI = 4,68 &#8211; 61,51).
Conclusion:
This study suggests that bilateral PND can treat perineodynia, anal and urinary incontinence. The three clinical signs of PCS seem to be efficient to suspect this diagnosis. There is a need for further studies to confirm these preliminary results.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/4/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Jacques Beco</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniela Climov</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michele Bex</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Surgery 2004, 4:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2004-10-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2482-4-15</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Surgery</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2482</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2004-10-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/9/15">
        <title>Evolution of breast cancer management in Ireland: a decade of change</title>
        <description>Background:
Over the last decade there has been a paradigm shift in the management of breast cancer, subsequent to revised surgical oncology guidelines and consensus statements which were derived in light of landmark breast cancer clinical trials conducted throughout the latter part of the 20th century. However the sheer impact of this paradigm shift upon all modalities of treatment, and the current trends in management of the disease, are largely unknown. We aimed to assess the changing practices of breast cancer management over the last decade within a specialist tertiary referral Breast Cancer Centre.
Methods:
Comparative analysis of all aspects of the management of breast cancer patients, who presented to a tertiary referral Breast Cancer Centre in 1995/1996 and 2005/2006, was undertaken and measured against The European Society for Surgical Oncology guidelines for the surgical management of mammographically detected lesions [1998].
Results:
613 patients&apos; case profiles were analysed. Over the last decade we observed a dramatic increase in incidence of breast cancer [&gt;100%], a move to less invasive diagnostic and surgical therapeutic techniques, as well as increased use of adjuvant therapies. We also witnessed the introduction of immediate breast reconstruction as part of routine practice
Conclusion:
We demonstrate that radical changes have occurred in the management of breast cancer in the last decade, in keeping with international guidelines. It remains incumbent upon us to continue to adapt our practice patterns in light of emerging knowledge and best evidence.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/9/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Helen Heneghan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ruth Prichard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Amanda Devaney</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karl Sweeney</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carmel Malone</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ray McLaughlin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Kerin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Surgery 2009, 9:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2482-9-15</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Surgery</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2482</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/9/11">
        <title>APACHE III outcome prediction in patients admitted to the intensive care unit after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study</title>
        <description>Background:
The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III prognostic system has not been previously validated in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We hypothesized that APACHE III would perform satisfactorily in patients after OLT
Methods:
A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients admitted to the ICU after OLT between July 1996 and May 2008 were identified. Data were abstracted from the institutional APACHE III and liver transplantation databases and individual patient medical records. Standardized mortality ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) were calculated by dividing the observed mortality rates by the rates predicted by APACHE III. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow C statistic were used to assess, respectively, discrimination and calibration of APACHE III.
Results:
APACHE III data were available for 918 admissions after OLT. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) APACHE III (APIII) and Acute Physiology (APS) scores on the day of transplant were 60.5 (25.8) and 50.8 (23.6), respectively. Mean (SD) predicted ICU and hospital mortality rates were 7.3% (15.4) and 10.6% (18.9), respectively. The observed ICU and hospital mortality rates were 1.1% and 3.4%, respectively. The standardized ICU and hospital mortality ratios with their 95% C.I. were 0.15 (0.07 to 0.27) and 0.32 (0.22 to 0.45), respectively.There were statistically significant differences in APS, APIII, predicted ICU and predicted hospital mortality between survivors and non-survivors. In predicting mortality, the AUC of APACHE III prediction of hospital death was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.68). The Hosmer-Lemeshow C statistic was 5.288 with a p value of 0.871 (10 degrees of freedom).
Conclusion:
APACHE III discriminates poorly between survivors and non-survivors of patients admitted to the ICU after OLT. Though APACHE III has been shown to be valid in heterogenous populations and in certain groups of patients with specific diagnoses, it should be used with caution &#8211; if used at all &#8211; in recipients of liver transplantation.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/9/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Mark Keegan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bhargavi Gali</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James Findlay</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julie Heimbach</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Plevak</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bekele Afessa</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Surgery 2009, 9:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2482-9-11</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Surgery</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2482</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/7/20">
        <title>Sphincter saving anorectoplasty (SSARP) for the reconstruction of 
Anorectal malformations
</title>
        <description>Background:
This report describes a new technique of sphincter saving anorectoplasty (SSARP) for the repair of anorectal malformations (ARM).
Methods:
Twenty six males with high ARM were treated with SSARP. Preoperative localization of the center of the muscle complex is facilitated using real time sonography and computed tomography. A soft guide wire is inserted under image control which serves as the route for final pull through of bowel. The operative technique consists of a subcoccygeal approach to dissect the blind rectal pouch. The separation of the rectum from the fistulous communication followed by pull through of the bowel is performed through the same incision. The skin or the levators in the midline posteriorly are not divided. Postoperative anorectal function as assessed by clinical Wingspread scoring was judged as excellent, good, fair and poor. Older patients were examined for sensations of touch, pain, heat and cold in the circumanal skin and the perineum. Electromyography (EMG) was done to assess preoperative and postoperative integrity of external anal sphincter (EAS).
Results:
The patients were separated in 2 groups. The first group, Group I (n = 10), were newborns in whom SSARP was performed as a primary procedure. The second group, Group II (n = 16), were children who underwent an initial colostomy followed by delayed SSARP. There were no operative complications. The follow up ranged from 4 months to 18 months. Group I patients have symmetric anal contraction to stimulation and strong squeeze on digital rectal examination with an average number of bowel movements per day was 3&#8211;5. In group II the rate of excellent and good scores was 81% (13/16). All patients have an appropriate size anus and regular bowel actions. There has been no rectal prolapse, or anal stricture. EAS activity and perineal proprioception were preserved postoperatively. Follow up computed tomogram showed central placement the pull through bowel in between the muscle complex.
Conclusion:
The technique of SSARP allows safe and anatomical reconstruction in a significant proportion of patients with ARM&apos;s without the need to divide the levator plate and muscle complex. It preserves all the components contributing to superior faecal continence, and avoids the potential complications associated with the open posterior sagittal approach.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/7/20</link>
                <dc:creator>Akshay Pratap</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Awadhesh Tiwari</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anand Kumar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shailesh Adhikary</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Satyendra Singh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bishnu Paudel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rajiv Bartaula</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Brijesh Mishra</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Surgery 2007, 7:20</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-09-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2482-7-20</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Surgery</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2482</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-09-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
