<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?journal=bmcpulmmed&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Pulmonary Medicine - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpulmmed/</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by BMC Pulmonary Medicine</description>
        <dc:date>2009-12-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/52" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/51" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/50" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/49" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/48" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/47" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/46" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/45" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/44" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/43" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/52">
        <title>Action Plan to enhance self-management and early detection of exacerbations in COPD patients; a multicenter RCT.</title>
        <description>Background:
Early detection of exacerbations by COPD patients initiating prompt interventions has shown to be clinically relevant. Until now, research failed to identify the effectiveness of a written individualized Action Plan (AP) to achieve this.Methods / DesignThe current multicenter, single-blind RCT with a follow-up period of 6 months, evaluates the hypothesis that individualized AP&apos;s reduce exacerbation recovery time. Patients are included from regular respiratory nurse clinics and allocated to either usual care or the AP intervention. The AP provides individualized treatment prescriptions (pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical) related to a color coded symptom status (reinforcement at 1 and 4 months). Although usually not possible in self-management trials, we ensured blinding of patients, using a modified informed consent procedure in which patients give consent to postponed information. Exacerbations in both study arms are defined using the Anthonisen symptom diary-card algorithm. The Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) is assessed every 3-days. CCQ-recovery time of an exacerbation is the primary study outcome. Additionally, healthcare utilization, anxiety, depression, treatment delay, and self-efficacy are assessed at baseline and 6 months. We aim at including 245 COPD patients from 7 hospitals and 5 general practices to capture the a-priori sample size of at least 73 exacerbations per study arm.DiscussionThis RCT identifies if an AP is an effective component of self-management in patients with COPD and clearly differentiates from existing studies in its design, outcome measures and generalizability of the results considering that the study is carried out in multiple sites including general practices.Trial RegistrationNCT00879281</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/52</link>
                <dc:creator>Jaap Trappenburg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lieselotte Koevoets</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gerdien de Weert - van Oene</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Evelyn Monninkhof</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jean Bourbeau</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thierry Troosters</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Theo Verheij</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jan-Willem Lammers</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Augustinus Schrijvers</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2009, 9:52</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-9-52</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>52</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/51">
        <title>Effects of acute hypoventilation and hyperventilation
on exhaled carbon monoxide measurement in healthy volunteers</title>
        <description>Background:
High levels of exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) are a marker of airway or lung inflammation. We investigated whether hypo- or hyperventilation can affect measured values.
Methods:
Ten healthy volunteers were trained to maintain a target end-tidal CO2 (etCO2) of 30 (hyperventilation), 40 (normoventilation), and 50 mmHg (hypoventilation) for few minutes. As soon as target etCO2 was stably achieved for 120 sec, exhaled breath was sampled for CO analysis. At etCO2 values of 30 and 40 mmHg, exhaled breath was sampled both after a deep inspiration and after a normal one; at an etCO2 of 50 mmHg exhaled breath was sampled only after a normal inspiration. Measurements were performed in two settings: A (environmental CO: 0.8 ppm) and B (environmental CO = 1.7 ppm).
Results:
During normoventilation, eCO mean (standard deviation) was 11.5 (0.8); it decreased to 10.3 (0.8) ppm during hyperventilation (p &lt;.001) and increased to 11.9 (0.8) ppm during hypoventilation (p &lt;.001). eCO changes were less pronounced than the correspondent etCO2 changes (hyperventilation: 10% Vs 25% decrease; hypoventilation 3% Vs 25% increase). Taking a deep inspiration before breath sampling was associated with lower eCO values (p &lt;.001), while values obtained in A and B settings did not differ from each other.
Conclusions:
eCO measurements should not be performed during marked acute hyperventilation, like that induced in this study, but the influence of less pronounced hyperventilation or of hypoventilation is probably negligible in clinical practice</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/51</link>
                <dc:creator>Franco Cavaliere</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carmen Volpe</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Riccardo Gargaruti</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrea Poscia</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michele Di Donato</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Giovanni Grieco</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Umberto Moscato</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2009, 9:51</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-9-51</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>51</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/50">
        <title>Evaluation of current knowledge, awareness and practice of spirometry among hospital-based Nigerian Doctors&apos;
</title>
        <description>Background:
Spirometry is a cost-effective diagnostic tool for evaluation of lung function and for case-finding in a resource-limited setting. The acceptance of this test depends on the awareness of its indications and knowledge of interpretation. No studies have assessed the spirometry knowledge of Nigerian doctors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current knowledge, awareness and practice of spirometry among hospital -based Nigerian doctors.
Methods:
We carried out a cross-sectional study among 321 doctors working in Nigerian hospitals between March 2008 and June 2008.  Information on knowledge, awareness, practices and barriers to spirometry were obtained using a pre-tested, self-administered structured questionnaire and the data was then analysed.
Results:
Of the 321 doctors that participated, 108 (33.6%) reported that they have good knowledge of spirometry. One hundred and ninety five (60.7%) were aware of the importance of spirometry in establishing the diagnosis of respiratory disease; 213(66.4%) were aware of the importance of spirometry in determining the severity of diseases. Medical school was the common sources of education on spirometry (64.5%). Sixty doctors (18.7%) reported that they were very confident at interpreting spirometry.  Eighty-one (25.2%) doctors reported having a spirometer in their hospitals. Doctors having access to spirometer frequently used spirometry for aiding the diagnosis of COPD (40.7% vs.27.5%) and for monitoring of asthma (18.5% vs.11.3%) as compared to those without access to spirometry. The doctors working in University  Teaching Hospitals and Federal Medical Centres (FMC) (22.4% vs. 4.5%) and those having access to spirometry (40.7 vs.11.3%) were very confident at interpreting spirometry as compared to those working in Districts and General Hospital and without access to spirometry respectively .Irrespective of the doctors accessibility to spirometer or the types of hospital they were employed , unavailabilityof spirometer was  reported as the greatest barrier to its utilisation 207(62.5%), followed by unawareness of its usefulness 57(17.2%) .
Conclusion:
The knowledge and practice of spirometry were poor among hospital-based Nigerian doctors.  These findings have implications for further evaluation, planning and management of patient care in respiratory disease. Spirometers should be made available to all hospitals and the knowledge of spirometer improved among doctors.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/50</link>
                <dc:creator>Olufemi Desalu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Olusegun Busari</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cajetan Onyedum</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fatai Salawu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Olusegun Obateru</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kelechukwu Nwogu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alakija Salami</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2009, 9:50</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-9-50</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>50</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/49">
        <title>Plasma CC16 levels are associated with development of ALI/ARDS in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia: a retrospective observational study</title>
        <description>Background:
Despite consensus criteria, diagnosing acute lung injury, or its more severe form acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) remains challenging. Adding objective measures, such as plasma levels of biological markers could facilitate recognition of ALI/ARDS. This study was designed to assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of biological markers for ALI/ARDS with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).
Methods:
We performed serial measurements of Clara cell protein (CC16), soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE), surfactant protein D (SP-D) and Krebs von den Lungen (KL-6) in plasma of patients with VAP and mechanically ventilated control patients without VAP. ALI/ARDS was diagnosed using the criteria of the North-American European consensus conference.
Results:
Thirty-seven patients were enrolled - 22 patients with VAP and 15 control patients. Ten patients with pneumonia met the ALI/ARDS consensus criteria. Control patients never met these criteria. Plasma CC16 had a good diagnostic capacity for ALI/ARDS as shown by the receiver operating characteristic curve with an area under the curve of 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 - 1.00; p &lt; 0.001). Identification of ALI/ARDS patients by sudden increases in plasma CC16 of 30% or more yielded a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 92%. Of note, levels of CC16 increased 2 days before ALI/ARDS diagnosis. A cut-off level of 50 ng/ml SP-D yielded a specificity of 100% while the sensitivity was 70%. The area under the curve for SP-D was 0.80 (95% CI 0.58 - 1.00; p = 0.02). The diagnostic accuracies of KL-6 and sRAGE were low.
Conclusion:
Plasma CC16 seems a potential biological marker for ALI/ARDS in patients with VAP. Plasma levels of sRAGE, SP-D and KL-6 have limited discriminative power for diagnosing ALI/ARDS in VAP.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/49</link>
                <dc:creator>Rogier Determann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julian Millo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sam Waddy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rene Lutter</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chris Garrard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marcus Schultz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2009, 9:49</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-9-49</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>49</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/48">
        <title>Comparative analysis of selected exhaled breath biomarkers obtained with two different temperature-controlled devices</title>
        <description>Background:
The collection of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a suitable and non-invasive method for evaluation of airway inflammation. Several studies indicate that the composition of the condensate and the recovery of biomarkers are affected by physical characteristics of the condensing device and collecting circumstances. Additionally, there is an apparent influence of the condensing temperature, and often the level of detection of the assay is a limiting factor. The ECoScreen2 device is a new, partly single-use disposable system designed for studying different lung compartments.
Methods:
EBC samples were collected from 16 healthy non-smokers by using the two commercially available devices ECoScreen2 and ECoScreen at a controlled temperature of -20&#176;C. EBC volume, pH, NOx, LTB4, PGE2, 8-isoprostane and cys-LTs were determined.
Results:
EBC collected with ECoScreen2 was less acidic compared to ECoScreen. ECoScreen2 was superior concerning condensate volume and detection of biomarkers, as more samples were above the detection limit (LTB4 and PGE2) or showed higher concentrations (8-isoprostane). However, NOx was detected only in EBC sampled by ECoScreen.
Conclusion:
ECoScreen2 in combination with mediator specific enzyme immunoassays may be suitable for measurement of different biomarkers. Using this equipment, patterns of markers can be assessed that are likely to reflect the complex pathophysiological processes in inflammatory respiratory disease.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/48</link>
                <dc:creator>Frank Hoffmeyer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Monika Raulf-Heimsoth</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Volker Harth</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jurgen Bunger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Bruning</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2009, 9:48</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-9-48</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>48</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/47">
        <title>Evaluation of psychological and physiological predictors of fatigue in patients with COPD </title>
        <description>Background:
Fatigue in COPD impairs functional status; however there are few studies examining mechanistic pathways of this symptom. The aims of this study are to compare fatigue between COPD patients and healthy age-matched subjects, and to identify predictors of fatigue in COPD.
Methods:
Seventy four COPD patients, mean age 69.9 (49-87) yrs, mean (SD) % predicted FEV1 46.5 (20.0) % and FEV1/FVC ratio 0.45 (0.13) and 35 healthy subjects, mean age 67.1 (50-84) yrs completed the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI 20). Patients&apos; assessment included Depression (HADS), lung function, BMI, muscle strength, incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT), exercise oxygen saturation (SpO2), Borg breathlessness (CR-10) and exertion (RPE). Serum level of Interleukin 6 (IL-6) was recorded. Differences in MFI 20 between groups were examined and predictors of fatigue identified using logistic regression.
Results:
Significant differences (p &lt; 0.01) were found between the COPD and healthy subjects for all MFI 20 dimensions. There were significant differences when classified according to GOLD and dyspnoea stages for selected dimensions only. Predictors of General Fatigue were depression, muscle strength and end SpO2 (R2 = .62); of Physical Fatigue: depression, % predicted FEV1, ISWT and age (R2 = .57); Reduced Activity: % predicted FEV1, BMI and depression (R2 = .36); Reduced Motivation: RPE, depression and end SpO2 (R2 = .37) and Mental Fatigue: depression and end SpO2 (R2 = .38).
Conclusion:
All dimensions of fatigue were higher in COPD than healthy aged subjects. Predictive factors differ according to the dimension of fatigue under investigation. COPD-RF is a multi component symptom requiring further consideration.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/47</link>
                <dc:creator>Agnieszka Lewko</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Penelope Bidgood</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rachel Garrod</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2009, 9:47</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-9-47</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>47</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/46">
        <title>Association of the TLR4 Asp299Gly polymorphism with lung function in relation to body mass index</title>
        <description>Background:
Previous studies have shown conflicting results for the association between TLR4 polymorphism (Asp299Gly) and lung function. We investigated the influence of TLR4 Asp299Gly, a polymorphism, on lung function in a community population.
Methods:
In 2003, a cross-sectional survey was conducted to assess the respiratory health of residents living in and around the town of Humboldt, Saskatchewan, Canada. There were 2090 adults age 18-79 years who completed a questionnaire that included a medical and smoking history, as well as socio-economic and lifestyle variables. Genetic information and lung function test measurements were available on 1725 subjects (754 males and 971 females) of the 2090 respondents. These subjects were selected for further analysis to investigate the association between TLR4 Asp299Gly genotype and forced expiratory volume in the first second in liters (FEV1), forced vital capacity in liters (FVC), FEV1/FVC ratio, and forced expiratory flow rate in liters/second (FEF25-75). Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to investigate associations.
Results:
Adjusted mean values of FEV1 and FVC were significantly different between TLR4 wild type and TLR4 variant groups [Mean &#177; S.E.: (TLR4 wild type - FEV1: 3.18 &#177; 0.02, FVC: 3.95 &#177; 0.03; TLR4 variant - FEV1: 3.31 &#177; 0.06, FVC: 4.14 &#177; 0.07)]. Based on multivariable regression analysis, we observed that body mass index (BMI) was associated with decreased FEV1/FVC ratio and FEF25-75 in TLR4 variant group but not in wild type group.
Conclusion:
BMI may modify the associations of TLR4 Asp299Gly polymorphism with FEV1/FVC ratio and FEF25-75.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/46</link>
                <dc:creator>Punam Pahwa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chandima Karunanayake</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Donna Rennie</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yue Chen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Schwartz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James Dosman</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2009, 9:46</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-9-46</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>46</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/45">
        <title>Protective effect of geranylgeranylacetone, an inducer of heat shock protein 70, against drug-induced lung injury/fibrosis in an animal model</title>
        <description>Background:
To determine whether oral administration of geranylgeranylacetone (GGA), a nontoxic anti-ulcer drug that is an inducer of heat shock protein (HSP) 70, protects against drug-induced lung injury/fibrosis in vivo.
Methods:
We used a bleomycin (BLM)-induced lung fibrosis model in which mice were treated with oral 600 mg/kg of GGA before and after BLM administration. Inflammation and fibrosis were evaluated by histological scoring, hydroxyproline content in the lung and inflammatory cell count, and quantification by ELISA of macrophage inflammatory protein-2 (MIP-2) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Apoptosis was evaluated by the TUNEL method. The induction of HSP70 in the lung was examined with western blot analysis and its localization was determined by immunohistochemistry.
Results:
We confirmed the presence of inflammation and fibrosis in the BLM-induced lung injury model and induction of HSP70 by oral administration of GGA. GGA prevented apoptosis of cellular constituents of lung tissue, such as epithelial cells, most likely related to the de novo induction of HSP70 in the lungs. GGA-treated mice also showed less fibrosis of the lungs, associated with the findings of suppression of both production of MIP-2 and inflammatory cell accumulation in the injured lung, compared with vehicle-treated mice.
Conclusion:
GGA had a protective effect on drug-induced lung injury/fibrosis. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs such as methotrexate, which are indispensable for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, often cause interstitial lung diseases, an adverse event that currently cannot be prevented. Clinical use of GGA for drug-induced pulmonary fibrosis might be considered in the future.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/45</link>
                <dc:creator>Takayoshi Fujibayashi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Naozumi Hashimoto</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mayumi Jijiwa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yoshinori Hasegawa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Toshihisa Kojima</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Naoki Ishiguro</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2009, 9:45</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-9-45</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>45</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/44">
        <title>Efficacy and safety of tigecycline versus levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia</title>
        <description>Background:
Tigecycline, an expanded broad-spectrum glycylcycline, exhibits in vitro activity against many common pathogens associated with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), as well as penetration into lung tissues that suggests effectiveness in hospitalized CAP patients. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) tigecycline with IV levofloxacin in hospitalized adults with CAP.
Methods:
In this prospective, double-blind, non-inferiority phase 3 trial, eligible patients with a clinical diagnosis of CAP supported by radiographic evidence were stratified by Fine Pneumonia Severity Index and randomized to tigecycline or levofloxacin for 7-14 days of therapy. Co-primary efficacy endpoints were clinical response in the clinically evaluable (CE) and clinical modified intent-to-treat (c-mITT) populations at test-of-cure (Day 10-21 post-therapy).
Results:
Of the 428 patients who received at least one dose of study drug, 79% had CAP of mild-moderate severity according to their Fine score. Clinical cure rates for the CE population were 88.9% for tigecycline and 85.3% for levofloxacin. Corresponding c-mITT population rates were 83.7% and 81.5%, respectively. Eradication rates for Streptococcus pneumoniae were 92% for tigecycline and 89% for levofloxacin. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea were the most frequently reported adverse events. Rates of premature discontinuation of study drug or study withdrawal because of any adverse event were similar for both study drugs.
Conclusion:
These findings suggest that IV tigecycline is non-inferior to IV levofloxacin and is generally well-tolerated in the treatment of hospitalized adults with CAP.Trial registrationNCT00081575</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/44</link>
                <dc:creator>Cristina Tanaseanu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Slobodan Milutinovic</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Petre Calistru</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Janos Strausz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marius Zoulbas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Valeriy Chernyak</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nathalie Dartois</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nathalie Castaing</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hassan Gandjini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Angel Cooper</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2009, 9:44</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-9-44</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>44</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/43">
        <title>Impact of patient characteristics, education and knowledge on emergency room visits in patients with asthma and COPD: a descriptive and correlative study</title>
        <description>Background:
Asthma and COPD are major health problems and an extensive burden for the patient and the health care system. Patient education has been recommended, but the influence on knowledge and health outcomes is not fully examined. Our aims were to compare patient characteristics, education and knowledge in patients who had an emergency room (ER) visit, to explore factors related to disease knowledge, and to investigate patient characteristics, patient education and knowledge in relation to further ER visits over a 12 month period.
Methods:
Eighty-four patients with asthma and 52 with COPD, who had had an ER visit, were included. They were interviewed by telephone 4 to 6 weeks after the ER visit and followed for a year.
Results:
Patients with COPD were older, more sedentary, had had more ER visits the previous year, and had more co morbidity than patients with asthma. About 80% of the patients had received information from health professionals or participated in education/rehabilitation, but a minority (&lt; 20%) reported that their knowledge about how to handle the disease was good. Patients with &quot;good knowledge&quot; were younger, were more likely to have asthma diagnose, and had a higher educational background (p &lt; 0.05). Sixty-seven percent of the patients with COPD had repeated ER visits during the following year versus 42% in asthma (p &lt; 0.05) (adjusted HRR: 1.73 (1.03-2.90)). Patients who had had ER visits the year before inclusion had a higher risk of ER visits the following year (adjusted HRR: 3.83 (1.99-7.38)). There were no significant differences regarding patient education and knowledge between the group with and without further ER visits after adjusting for sex, diagnose, age, and educational background.
Conclusion:
Patients with asthma had a better self reported knowledge of disease management and were less likely to have new exacerbations than patients with COPD. Reported level of knowledge was, however, in it self not a predictor of exacerbations. This indicates that information is not sufficient to reduce the burden of disease. Patient education focused on self-management and behavioral change should be emphasized.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/43</link>
                <dc:creator>Margareta Emtner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anna Hedin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mikael Andersson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christer Janson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2009, 9:43</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-9-43</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>43</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
