<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?journal=bmcpulmmed&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Pulmonary Medicine - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpulmmed/</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by BMC Pulmonary Medicine</description>
        <dc:date>2009-10-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/45" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/32" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/47" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/44" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/42" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/36" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/7/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/7/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/41" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/43" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/45">
        <title>Protective effect of geranylgeranylacetone, an inducer of heat shock protein 70, against drug-induced lung injury/fibrosis in an animal model</title>
        <description>Background:
To determine whether oral administration of geranylgeranylacetone (GGA), a nontoxic anti-ulcer drug that is an inducer of heat shock protein (HSP) 70, protects against drug-induced lung injury/fibrosis in vivo.
Methods:
We used a bleomycin (BLM)-induced lung fibrosis model in which mice were treated with oral 600 mg/kg of GGA before and after BLM administration. Inflammation and fibrosis were evaluated by histological scoring, hydroxyproline content in the lung and inflammatory cell count, and quantification by ELISA of macrophage inflammatory protein-2 (MIP-2) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Apoptosis was evaluated by the TUNEL method. The induction of HSP70 in the lung was examined with western blot analysis and its localization was determined by immunohistochemistry.
Results:
We confirmed the presence of inflammation and fibrosis in the BLM-induced lung injury model and induction of HSP70 by oral administration of GGA. GGA prevented apoptosis of cellular constituents of lung tissue, such as epithelial cells, most likely related to the de novo induction of HSP70 in the lungs. GGA-treated mice also showed less fibrosis of the lungs, associated with the findings of suppression of both production of MIP-2 and inflammatory cell accumulation in the injured lung, compared with vehicle-treated mice.
Conclusion:
GGA had a protective effect on drug-induced lung injury/fibrosis. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs such as methotrexate, which are indispensable for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, often cause interstitial lung diseases, an adverse event that currently cannot be prevented. Clinical use of GGA for drug-induced pulmonary fibrosis might be considered in the future.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/45</link>
                <dc:creator>Takayoshi Fujibayashi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Naozumi Hashimoto</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mayumi Jijiwa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yoshinori Hasegawa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Toshihisa Kojima</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Naoki Ishiguro</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2009, 9:45</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-9-45</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>45</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/32">
        <title>Associations between statins and COPD: a systematic review </title>
        <description>Background:
Statins have anti-inflammatory and immunomodulating properties which could possibly influence inflammatory airways disease. We assessed evidence for disease modifying effects of statin treatment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Methods:
A systematic review was conducted of studies which reported effects of statin treatment in COPD. Data sources searched included MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference lists.
Results:
Eight papers reporting nine original studies met the selection criteria. One was a randomized controlled trial (RCT), one a retrospective nested case-control study, five were retrospective cohort studies of which one was linked with a case-control study, and one was a retrospective population-based analysis. Outcomes associated with treatment with statins included decreased all-cause mortality in three out of four studies (OR/HR 0.48&#8211;0.67 in three studies, OR 0.99 in one study), decreased COPD-related mortality (OR 0.19&#8211;0.29), reduction in incidence of respiratory-related urgent care (OR 0.74), fewer COPD exacerbations (OR 0.43), fewer intubations for COPD exacerbations (OR 0.1) and attenuated decline in pulmonary function. The RCT reported improvement in exercise capacity and dyspnea after exercise associated with decreased levels of C-reactive protein and Interleukin-6 in statin users, but no improvement of lung function.
Conclusion:
There is evidence from observational studies and one RCT that statins may reduce morbidity and/or mortality in COPD patients. Further interventional studies are required to confirm these findings.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/32</link>
                <dc:creator>Claudia Dobler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Keith Wong</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Guy Marks</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2009, 9:32</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-9-32</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>32</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/47">
        <title>Evaluation of psychological and physiological predictors of fatigue in patients with COPD </title>
        <description>Background:
Fatigue in COPD impairs functional status; however there are few studies examining mechanistic pathways of this symptom. The aims of this study are to compare fatigue between COPD patients and healthy age-matched subjects, and to identify predictors of fatigue in COPD.
Methods:
Seventy four COPD patients, mean age 69.9 (49-87) yrs, mean (SD) % predicted FEV1 46.5 (20.0) % and FEV1/FVC ratio 0.45 (0.13) and 35 healthy subjects, mean age 67.1 (50-84) yrs completed the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI 20). Patients&apos; assessment included Depression (HADS), lung function, BMI, muscle strength, incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT), exercise oxygen saturation (SpO2), Borg breathlessness (CR-10) and exertion (RPE). Serum level of Interleukin 6 (IL-6) was recorded. Differences in MFI 20 between groups were examined and predictors of fatigue identified using logistic regression.
Results:
Significant differences (p &lt; 0.01) were found between the COPD and healthy subjects for all MFI 20 dimensions. There were significant differences when classified according to GOLD and dyspnoea stages for selected dimensions only. Predictors of General Fatigue were depression, muscle strength and end SpO2 (R2 = .62); of Physical Fatigue: depression, % predicted FEV1, ISWT and age (R2 = .57); Reduced Activity: % predicted FEV1, BMI and depression (R2 = .36); Reduced Motivation: RPE, depression and end SpO2 (R2 = .37) and Mental Fatigue: depression and end SpO2 (R2 = .38).
Conclusion:
All dimensions of fatigue were higher in COPD than healthy aged subjects. Predictive factors differ according to the dimension of fatigue under investigation. COPD-RF is a multi component symptom requiring further consideration.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/47</link>
                <dc:creator>Agnieszka Lewko</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Penelope Bidgood</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rachel Garrod</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2009, 9:47</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-9-47</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>47</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/44">
        <title>Efficacy and safety of tigecycline versus levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia</title>
        <description>Background:
Tigecycline, an expanded broad-spectrum glycylcycline, exhibits in vitro activity against many common pathogens associated with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), as well as penetration into lung tissues that suggests effectiveness in hospitalized CAP patients. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) tigecycline with IV levofloxacin in hospitalized adults with CAP.
Methods:
In this prospective, double-blind, non-inferiority phase 3 trial, eligible patients with a clinical diagnosis of CAP supported by radiographic evidence were stratified by Fine Pneumonia Severity Index and randomized to tigecycline or levofloxacin for 7-14 days of therapy. Co-primary efficacy endpoints were clinical response in the clinically evaluable (CE) and clinical modified intent-to-treat (c-mITT) populations at test-of-cure (Day 10-21 post-therapy).
Results:
Of the 428 patients who received at least one dose of study drug, 79% had CAP of mild-moderate severity according to their Fine score. Clinical cure rates for the CE population were 88.9% for tigecycline and 85.3% for levofloxacin. Corresponding c-mITT population rates were 83.7% and 81.5%, respectively. Eradication rates for Streptococcus pneumoniae were 92% for tigecycline and 89% for levofloxacin. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea were the most frequently reported adverse events. Rates of premature discontinuation of study drug or study withdrawal because of any adverse event were similar for both study drugs.
Conclusion:
These findings suggest that IV tigecycline is non-inferior to IV levofloxacin and is generally well-tolerated in the treatment of hospitalized adults with CAP.Trial registrationNCT00081575</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/44</link>
                <dc:creator>Cristina Tanaseanu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Slobodan Milutinovic</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Petre Calistru</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Janos Strausz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marius Zoulbas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Valeriy Chernyak</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nathalie Dartois</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nathalie Castaing</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hassan Gandjini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Angel Cooper</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2009, 9:44</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-9-44</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>44</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/42">
        <title>Effect of traffic pollution on respiratory and allergic disease in adults: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses</title>
        <description>Background:
Epidemiological research into the role of traffic pollution on chronic respiratory and allergic disease has focused primarily on children. Studies in adults, in particular those based on objective outcomes such as bronchial hyperresponsiveness, skin sensitisation, and lung function, are limited.
Methods:
We have used an existing cohort of 2644 adults aged 18&#8211;70 living in Nottingham, UK, for whom baseline health and demographic data were collected in 1991 and computed two markers of exposure to traffic: distance between the home and nearest main road and modelled outdoor nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentration at the home location. Using multiple regression techniques, we analysed cross-sectional associations with bronchial hyperresponsiveness, FEV1, spirometry-defined COPD, skin test positivity, total IgE and questionnaire-reported wheeze, asthma, eczema and hayfever in 2599 subjects, and longitudinal associations with decline in FEV1 in 1329 subjects followed-up nine years later in 2000.
Results:
There were no significant cross-sectional associations between home proximity to the roadside or NO2 level on any of the outcomes studied (adjusted OR of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in relation to living &#8804;150 m vs &gt;150 m from a road = 0.92, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.24). Furthermore, neither exposure was associated with a significantly greater decline in FEV1 over time (adjusted mean difference in &#916;FEV1 for living &#8804;150 m vs &gt;150 m of a road = 10.03 ml, 95% CI, -33.98 to 54.04).
Conclusion:
This study found no evidence to suggest that living in close proximity to traffic is a major determinant of asthma, allergic disease or COPD in adults.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/42</link>
                <dc:creator>Mar Pujades-Rodriguez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tricia McKeever</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sarah Lewis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Duncan Whyatt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Britton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrea Venn</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2009, 9:42</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-08-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-9-42</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>42</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-08-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/36">
        <title>Respiratory physiotherapy and incidence of pulmonary complications in off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: an observational follow-up study</title>
        <description>Background:
Heart surgery is associated with an occurrence of pulmonary complications. The aim of this study was to determine whether pre-surgery respiratory physiotherapy reduces the incidence of post-surgery pulmonary complications.
Methods:
Observational study of 263 patients submitted to off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery at the A Coru&#241;a University Hospital (Spain). 159 (60.5%) patients received preoperative physiotherapy. The fact that patients received preoperative physiotherapy or not was related to whether they were admitted to the cardiac surgery unit or to an alternative unit due to a lack of beds.A physiotherapist provided a daily session involving incentive spirometry, deep breathing exercises, coughing and early ambulation. A logistic regression analysis was carried out in order to identify variables associated with pulmonary complications.
Results:
Both groups of patients (those that received physiotherapy and those that did not) were similar in age, sex, body mass index, creatinine, ejection fraction, number of affected vessels, O2 basal saturation, prevalence of diabetes, dyslipidemia, exposure to tobacco, age at smoking initiation, number of cigarettes/day and number of years as a smoker. The most frequent postoperative complications were hypoventilation (90.7%), pleural effusion (47.5%) and atelectasis (24.7%).In the univariate analysis, prophylactic physiotherapy was associated with a lower incidence of atelectasis (17% compared to 36%, p = 0.01).After taking into account age, sex, ejection fraction and whether the patients received physiotherapy or not, we observed that receiving physiotherapy is the variable with an independent effect on predicting atelectasis.
Conclusion:
Preoperative respiratory physiotherapy is related to a lower incidence of atelectasis.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/36</link>
                <dc:creator>Isabel Yanez-Brage</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Salvador Pita-Fernandez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alberto Juffe-Stein</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ursicino Martinez-Gonzalez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sonia Pertega-Diaz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Angeles Mauleon-Garcia</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2009, 9:36</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-9-36</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>36</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/7/2">
        <title>Aerosolized amikacin for treatment of pulmonary Mycobacterium aviuminfections: an observational case series</title>
        <description>Background:
Current systemic therapy for nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary infection is limited by poor clinical response rates, drug toxicities and side effects. The addition of aerosolized amikacin to standard oral therapy for nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary infection may improve treatment efficacy without producing systemic toxicity. This study was undertaken to assess the safety, tolerability and preliminary clinical benefits of the addition of aerosolized amikacin to a standard macrolide-based oral treatment regimen.Case PresentationsSix HIV-negative patients with Mycobacterium avium intracellulare pulmonary infections who had failed standard therapy were administered aerosolized amikacin at 15 mg/kg daily in addition to standard multi-drug macrolide-based oral therapy. Patients were monitored clinically and serial sputum cultures were obtained to assess response to therapy. Symptomatic improvement with radiographic stabilization and eradication of mycobacterium from sputum were considered markers of success.Of the six patients treated with daily aerosolized amikacin, five responded to therapy. All of the responders achieved symptomatic improvement and four were sputum culture negative after 6 months of therapy. Two patients became re-infected with Mycobacterium avium intracellulare after 7 and 21 months of treatment. One of the responders who was initially diagnosed with Mycobacterium avium intracellulare became sputum culture positive for Mycobacterium chelonae resistant to amikacin after being on intermittent therapy for 4 years. One patient had progressive respiratory failure and died despite additional therapy. There was no evidence of nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity associated with therapy.
Conclusion:
Aerosolized delivery of amikacin is a promising adjunct to standard therapy for pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial infections. Larger prospective trials are needed to define its optimal role in therapy of this disease.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/7/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Kala Davis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Kao</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susan Jacobs</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stephen Ruoss</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2007, 7:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-02-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-7-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-02-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/7/8">
        <title>Can asthma control be improved by understanding the patients perspective? </title>
        <description>Background:
Clinical trials show that asthma can be controlled in the majority of patients, but poorly controlled asthma still imposes a considerable burden. The level of asthma control achieved reflects the behaviour of both healthcare professionals and patients. A key challenge for healthcare professionals is to help patients to engage in self-management behaviours with optimal adherence to appropriate treatment. These issues are particularly relevant in primary care, where most asthma is managed. An international panel of experts invited by the International Primary Care Respiratory Group considered the evidence and discussed the implications for primary care practice.DiscussionCauses of poor controlClinical factors such as exposure to triggers and concomitant rhinitis are important but so are patient behavioural factors. Behaviours such as smoking and nonadherence may reduce the efficacy of treatment and patients&apos; perceptions influence these behaviours. Perceptual barriers to adherence include doubting the need for treatment when symptoms are absent and concerns about potential adverse effects. Under-treatment may also be related to patients&apos; underestimation of the significance of symptoms, and lack of awareness of achievable control.ImplicationsThree key implications for healthcare professionals emerged from the debate. First, the need for simple tools to assess asthma control. Two approaches considered were the monitoring of biometric markers of control and questionnaires to record patient-reported outcomes. Second, to understand the reasons for poor control for individual patients, identifying both clinical (e.g. rhinitis) and behavioural factors (e.g. smoking and nonadherence to treatment). Third was the need to incorporate, within asthma review, an assessment of patient perspectives including their goals and aspirations and to elicit their beliefs and concerns about asthma and its treatment. This can be used as a basis for agreement between the healthcare professional and patient on a predefined target regarding asthma control and a treatment plan to achieve this.SummaryOptimum review of asthma is essential to improve control. A key priority is the development of simple and effective tools for identifying poor control for individual patients coupled with a tailored approach to treatment to enable patients to set and achieve realistic goals for asthma control.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/7/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Rob Horne</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Price</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jen Cleland</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rui Costa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Donna Covey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kevin Gruffydd-Jones</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Haughney</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Svein Hoegh Henrichsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alan Kaplan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Arnulf Langhammer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anders Ostrem</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mike Thomas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thys van der Molen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>J Christian Virchow</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sian Williams</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2007, 7:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-05-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-7-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-05-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/41">
        <title>T-cell-based diagnosis of tuberculosis infection in children in Lithuania: a country of high incidence despite a high coverage with bacille Calmette-Guerin vaccination</title>
        <description>Background:
Lithuania is a country with a high incidence of tuberculosis (TB), despite a high coverage with bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination. Until now the only method used to detect latent TB infection was the tuberculin skin test (TST). However, TST may have a cross reactivity to the BCG vaccine and to environmental mycobacteria. The aim of this study was to conduct assessments of the diagnostic accuracy of the T-cell based test (T SPOT TB) for TB in children who had previously been BCG vaccinated and compare these with the results of the TST.
Methods:
Between January 2005 and February 2007, children with bacteriologically confirmed TB, children having contacts with a case of infectious pulmonary TB and children without any known risk for TB were tested with both the TST and T SPOT TB.
Results:
The TST and T SPOT TB tests were positive for all patients in the &#8222;culture-confirmed TB&#8220; group. Whereas, in the &#8222;high risk for TB&#8220; group, the TST was positive for 60%, but the T SPOT TB test, only for 17.8%. Meanwhile the results for the &#8222;low risk for TB&#8220; group were 65.4% and 9.6%, respectively. A correlation between the TST and T SPOT TB was obtained in the &quot;culture-confirmed TB&quot; group where the TST &#8805;15 mm (r = 0.35, p &lt; 0.001).
Conclusion:
The T-cell based method is more objective than the TST for identifying latent TB infection in children who had been previously BCG vaccinated. This method could be useful in countries like Lithuania where there is a high incidence of TB despite a high coverage with BCG vaccination. It may also help to avoid unnecessary chemoprophylaxis when TST reactions are false-positive.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/41</link>
                <dc:creator>Edita Hansted</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Angele Andriuskeviciene</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Raimundas Sakalauskas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rimantas Kevalas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Brigita Sitkauskiene</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2009, 9:41</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-08-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-9-41</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>41</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-08-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/43">
        <title>Impact of patient characteristics, education and knowledge on emergency room visits in patients with asthma and COPD: a descriptive and correlative study</title>
        <description>Background:
Asthma and COPD are major health problems and an extensive burden for the patient and the health care system. Patient education has been recommended, but the influence on knowledge and health outcomes is not fully examined. Our aims were to compare patient characteristics, education and knowledge in patients who had an emergency room (ER) visit, to explore factors related to disease knowledge, and to investigate patient characteristics, patient education and knowledge in relation to further ER visits over a 12 month period.
Methods:
Eighty-four patients with asthma and 52 with COPD, who had had an ER visit, were included. They were interviewed by telephone 4 to 6 weeks after the ER visit and followed for a year.
Results:
Patients with COPD were older, more sedentary, had had more ER visits the previous year, and had more co morbidity than patients with asthma. About 80% of the patients had received information from health professionals or participated in education/rehabilitation, but a minority (&lt; 20%) reported that their knowledge about how to handle the disease was good. Patients with &quot;good knowledge&quot; were younger, were more likely to have asthma diagnose, and had a higher educational background (p &lt; 0.05). Sixty-seven percent of the patients with COPD had repeated ER visits during the following year versus 42% in asthma (p &lt; 0.05) (adjusted HRR: 1.73 (1.03-2.90)). Patients who had had ER visits the year before inclusion had a higher risk of ER visits the following year (adjusted HRR: 3.83 (1.99-7.38)). There were no significant differences regarding patient education and knowledge between the group with and without further ER visits after adjusting for sex, diagnose, age, and educational background.
Conclusion:
Patients with asthma had a better self reported knowledge of disease management and were less likely to have new exacerbations than patients with COPD. Reported level of knowledge was, however, in it self not a predictor of exacerbations. This indicates that information is not sufficient to reduce the burden of disease. Patient education focused on self-management and behavioral change should be emphasized.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/9/43</link>
                <dc:creator>Margareta Emtner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anna Hedin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mikael Andersson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christer Janson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2009, 9:43</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2466-9-43</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2466</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>43</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
