<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?journal=bmcpublichealth&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Public Health - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpublichealth/</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by BMC Public Health</description>
        <dc:date>2012-02-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/110" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/109" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/108" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/107" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/106" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/105" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/104" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/103" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/102" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/101" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/110">
        <title>Assessing knowledge, attitude, and practice of emergency contraception: a cross- sectional study among Ethiopian undergraduate female students
</title>
        <description>Background:
Emergency contraception (EC) is a type of modern contraception which is indicated after unprotected sexual intercourse when regular contraception is not in use. The importance of EC is evident in preventing unintended pregnancies and its ill consequences like unintended child delivery or unsafe abortion, which are the most common causes of maternal mortality. Therefore, EC need to be available and used appropriately as a backup in case regular contraception is not used, misused or failed. Knowing that Ethiopia is one of the countries with highest maternal mortality rate, this study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice of EC, and to further elucidate the relationship between these factors and some socioeconomic and demographic characteristics among female undergraduate students of Addis Ababa University (AAU). This information will contribute substantially to interventions intended to combat maternal mortality.
Methods:
A Cross-sectional quantitative study among 368 AAU undergraduate students was conducted using self-administered questionnaire. Study participants were selected by stratified random sampling. Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS Version 17 .Results were presented using descriptive statistics, cross-tabulation and logistic regression.
Results:
Among the total participants (n = 368), only 23.4% were sexually active. Majority (84.2%) had heard of EC; 32.3% had a positive attitude towards it. The main source of information reported by the respondents was Media (69.3%). Among those who were sexually active, about 42% had unprotected sexual intercourse. Among those who had unprotected sexual intercourse, 75% had ever used EC. Sexually active participants had significantly better attitude towards EC than sexually inactive participants (crude OR 0.33(0.15-0.71)); even after adjusting for possible confounders such as age, region, religion, ethnicity, marital status, department and family education and income (adj. OR 0.36(0.15-0.86)).
Conclusions:
The study showed high EC awareness and usage in contrast to other studies in the city, which could be due to the fact that university students are relatively in a better educational level. Therefore, it is highly recommended that interventions intended to combat maternal mortality through contraceptive usage need to be aware of such information specific to the target groups.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/110</link>
                <dc:creator>Fatuma Ahmed</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kontie Moussa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karen Petterson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Benedict Asamoah</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Public Health 2012, null:110</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-110</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-2458-12-110-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Public Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2458</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>110</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/109">
        <title>Research, evidence and policymaking: the perspectives of policy actors on improving uptake of evidence in health policy development and implementation in Uganda</title>
        <description>Background:
Use of evidence in health policymaking plays an important role, especially in resource-constrained settings where informed decisions on resource allocation are paramount. Several knowledge translation (KT) models have been developed, but few have been applied to health policymaking in low income countries. If KT models are expected to explain evidence uptake and implementation, or lack of it, they must be contextualized and take into account the specificity of low income countries for example, the strong influence of donors. The main objective of this research is to elaborate a Middle Range Theory (MRT) of KT in Uganda that can also serve as a reference for other low- and middle income countries.
Methods:
This two-step study employed qualitative approaches to examine the principal barriers and facilitating factors to KT. Step 1 involved a literature review and identification of common themes. The results informed the development of the initial MRT, which details the facilitating factors and barriers to KT at the different stages of research and policy development. In Step 2, these were further refined through key informant interviews with policymakers and researchers in Uganda. Deductive content and thematic analysis was carried out to assess the degree of convergence with the elements of the initial MRT and to identify other emerging issues.
Results:
Review of the literature revealed that the most common emerging facilitating factors could be grouped under institutional strengthening for KT, research characteristics, dissemination, partnerships and political context. The analysis of interviews, however, showed that policymakers and researchers ranked institutional strengthening for KT, research characteristics and partnerships as the most important. New factors emphasized by respondents were the use of mainstreamed structures within MoH to coordinate and disseminate research, the separation of roles between researchers and policymakers, and the role of the community and civil society in KT.
Conclusions:
This study refined an initial MRT on KT in policymaking in the health sector in Uganda that was based on a literature review. It provides a framework that can be used in empirical research of the process of KT on specific policy issues.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/109</link>
                <dc:creator>Juliet Nabyonga Orem</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Kaawa Mafigiri</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bruno Marchal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Freddie Ssengooba</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jean Macq</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bart Criel</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Public Health 2012, null:109</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-109</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-2458-12-109-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Public Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2458</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>109</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/108">
        <title>Does place of residence affect risk of suicide? A spatial epidemiologic investigation in Kentucky from 1999 to 2008 </title>
        <description>Background:
Approximately 32,000 people take their own lives every year in the United States. In Kentucky, suicide mortality rates have been steadily increasing since 1999. Few studies in the United States have assessed spatial clustering of suicides. The purpose of this study was to identify high-risk clusters of suicide at the county level in Kentucky and assess the characteristics of those suicide cases within the clusters.
Methods:
A spatial epidemiological study was undertaken using suicide data for the period January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2008, obtained from the Kentucky Office of Vital Statistics. Descriptive analyses using Pearson&apos;s chi-square test and t-test were performed to determine whether differences existed in age, marital status, year, season, and suicide method between males and females, and between cases inside and outside high-risk spatial clusters. Annual age-adjusted cumulative incidence rates were also calculated. Suicide incidence rates were spatially smoothed using the Spatial Empirical Bayesian technique. Kulldorff&apos;s spatial scan statistic was applied on all suicide cases at the county level to identify counties with the highest risks of suicide. Temporal cluster analysis was also performed.
Results:
There were a total of 5,551 suicide cases in Kentucky from 1999 to 2008, of which 5,237 (94%) were included in our analyses. The majority of suicide cases were males (82%). The average age of suicide victims was 45.4 years. Two statistically significant (p &lt; 0.05) high-risk spatial clusters, involving 15 counties, were detected. The county level cumulative incidence rate in the most likely high-risk cluster ranged from 12.4 to 21.6 suicides per 100,000 persons. The counties inside both high-risk clusters had relative risks ranging from 1.24 to 1.38.
Conclusions:
Statistically significant high-risk spatial clusters of suicide were detected at the county level. This study may be useful for guiding future research and intervention efforts. Future studies will need to focus on these high-risk clusters to investigate reasons for these occurrences.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/108</link>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Saman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sabrina Walsh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anna Borowko</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Agricola Odoi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Public Health 2012, null:108</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-108</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-2458-12-108-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Public Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2458</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>108</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/107">
        <title>The relationship between breastfeeding and weight status in a national sample of Australian children and adolescents</title>
        <description>Background:
Breastfeeding has been shown consistently in observational studies to be protective of overweight and obesity in later life. This study aimed to investigate the association between breastfeeding duration and weight status in a national sample of Australian children and adolescents.
Methods:
A secondary analysis of the 2007 Australian National Children&apos;s Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey data involving 2066 males and females aged 9 to 16 years from all Australian states and territories. The effect of breastfeeding duration on weight status was estimated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Results:
Compared to those who were never breastfed, children breastfed for [greater than or equal to]6 months were significantly less likely to be overweight (adjusted odds ratio: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.45, 0.91) or obese (adjusted odds ratio: 0.51, 95%CI: 0.29, 0.90) in later childhood, after adjustment for maternal characteristics (age, education and ethnicity) and children&apos;s age, gender, mean energy intake, level of moderate and vigorous physical activity, screen time and sleep duration.
Conclusions:
Breastfeeding for 6 or more months appears to be protective against later overweight and obesity in this population of Australian children. The beneficial short-term health outcomes of breastfeeding for the infant are well recognised and this study provides further observational evidence of a potential long-term health outcome and additional justification for the continued support and promotion of breastfeeding to six months and beyond.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/107</link>
                <dc:creator>Jane Scott</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Su Yi Ng</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lynne Cobiac</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Public Health 2012, null:107</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-107</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-2458-12-107-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Public Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2458</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>107</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/106">
        <title>Developing community-based preventive interventions in Hong Kong: a description of the first phase of the Family Project</title>
        <description>Background:
This paper describes the development of culturally-appropriate family-based interventions and their relevant measures, to promote family health, happiness and harmony in Hong Kong. Programs were developed in the community, using a collaborative approach with community partners. The development process, challenges, and the lessons learned are described. This experience may be of interest to the scientific community as there is little information currently available about community-based development of brief interventions with local validity in cultures outside the West.
Methods:
The academic-community collaborative team each brought strengths to the development process and determined the targets for intervention (parent-child relationships). Information from expert advisors and stakeholder discussion groups was collected and utilized to define the sources of stress in parent-child relationships.
Results:
Themes emerged from the literature and discussion groups that guided the content of the intervention. Projects emphasized features that were appropriate for this cultural group and promoted potential for sustainability, so that the programs might eventually be implemented at a population-wide level. Challenges included ensuring local direction, relevance and acceptability for the intervention content, engaging participants and enhancing motivation to make behavior changes after a brief program, measurement of behavior changes, and developing an equal partner relationship between academic and community staff.
Conclusions:
This work has public health significance because of the global importance of parent-child relationships as a risk-factor for many outcomes in adulthood, the need to develop interventions with strong evidence of effectiveness to populations outside the West, the potential application of our interventions to universal populations, and characteristics of the interventions that promote dissemination, including minimal additional costs for delivery by community agencies, and high acceptability to participants.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/106</link>
                <dc:creator>Sunita Stewart</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cecilia Fabrizio</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Malia Hirschmann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tai Hing Lam</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Public Health 2012, null:106</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-106</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-2458-12-106-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Public Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2458</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>106</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/105">
        <title>Determinants of insecticide-treated net ownership and utilization among pregnant women in Nigeria </title>
        <description>Background:
Malaria during pregnancy is a major public health problem in Nigeria leading to increase in the risk of maternal mortality, low birth weight and infant mortality. This paper is aimed at highlighting key predictors of the ownership of insecticide treated nets (ITNs) and its use among pregnant women in Nigeria.
Methods:
A total of 2348 pregnant women were selected by a multi-stage probability sampling technique. Structured interview schedule was used to elicit information on socio-demographic characteristics, ITN ownership, use, knowledge, behaviour and practices. Logistic regression was used to detect predictors of two indicators: ITN ownership, and ITN use in pregnancy among those who owned ITNs.
Results:
ITN ownership was low; only 28.8% owned ITNs. Key predictors of ITN ownership included women who knew that ITNs prevent malaria (OR = 3.85; p &lt; 0001); and registration at antenatal clinics (OR = 1.34; p = 0.003). The use of ITNs was equally low with only 7.5% of all pregnant women, and 25.7% of all pregnant women who owned ITNs sleeping under a net. The predictors of ITN use in pregnancy among women who owned ITNs (N = 677) identified by logistic regression were: urban residence (OR = 1.87; p = 0.001); knowledge that ITNs prevent malaria (OR = 2.93; p &lt; 0001) and not holding misconceptions about malaria prevention (OR = 1.56; p = 0.036). Educational level was not significantly related to any of the two outcome variables. Although registration at ANC is significantly associated with ownership of a bednet (perhaps through free ITN distribution) this does not translate to significant use of ITNs.
Conclusions:
ITN use lagged well behind ITN ownership. This seems to suggest that the current mass distribution of ITNs at antenatal facilities and community levels may not necessarily lead to use unless it is accompanied by behaviour change interventions that address the community level perceptions, misconceptions and positively position ITN as an effective prevention device to prevent malaria.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/105</link>
                <dc:creator>Augustine Ankomah</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Samson Adebayo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ekundayo Arogundade</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jennifer Anyanti</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ernest Nwokolo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Olaronke Ladipo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martin Meremikwu</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Public Health 2012, null:105</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-105</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-2458-12-105-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Public Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2458</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>105</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/104">
        <title>Stability and change in screen-based sedentary behaviours and associated factors among Norwegian children in the transition between childhood and adolescence</title>
        <description>Background:
In order to inform interventions to prevent sedentariness, more longitudinal studies are needed focusing on stability and change over time in multiple sedentary behaviours. This paper investigates patterns of stability and change in TV/DVD use, computer/electronic game use and total screen time (TST) and factors associated with these patterns among Norwegian children in the transition between childhood and adolescence.
Methods:
The baseline of this longitudinal study took place in September 2007 and included 975 students from 25 control schools of an intervention study, the HEalth In Adolescents (HEIA) study. The first follow-up took place in May 2008 and the second follow-up in May 2009, with 885 students participating at all time points (average age at baseline = 11.2, standard deviation +/- 0.3). Time used for/spent on TV/DVD and computer/electronic games was self-reported, and a TST variable (hours/week) was computed. Tracking analyses based on absolute and rank measures, as well as regression analyses to assess factors associated with change in TST and with tracking high TST were conducted.
Results:
Time spent on all sedentary behaviours investigated increased in both genders. Findings based on absolute and rank measures revealed a fair to moderate level of tracking over the 2 year period. High parental education was inversely related to an increase in TST among females. In males, self-efficacy related to barriers to physical activity and living with married or cohabitating parents were inversely related to an increase in TST. Factors associated with tracking high vs. low TST in the multinomial regression analyses were low self-efficacy and being of an ethnic minority background among females, and low self-efficacy, being overweight/obese and not living with married or cohabitating parents among males.
Conclusions:
Use of TV/DVD and computer/electronic games increased with age and tracked over time in this group of 11-13 year old Norwegian children. Interventions targeting these sedentary behaviours should thus be introduced early. The identified modifiable and non-modifiable factors associated with change in TST and tracking of high TST should be taken into consideration when planning such interventions.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/104</link>
                <dc:creator>Mekdes Gebremariam</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Torunn Totland</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lene Andersen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ingunn Bergh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mona Bjelland</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>May Grydeland</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ommundsen Yngvar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nanna Lien</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Public Health 2012, null:104</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-104</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-2458-12-104-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Public Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2458</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>104</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/103">
        <title>Exploring factors relevant in the assessment of the return-to-work process of employees on long-term sickness absence due to a depressive disorder: a focus group study</title>
        <description>Background:
Efforts undertaken during the Return-to-Work (RTW) process need to be sufficient in order to optimize the quality of the RTW process. The purpose of this study was to explore factors relevant to Return-to-Work Effort Sufficiency (RTW-ES) in cases of sick-listed employees with a Depressive Disorder (DD).MethodA case of a long-term sick-listed employee with a DD applying for disability benefits was used to gather arguments and grounds relevant to the assessment of RTW-ES. Two focus group meetings were held, consisting of Labor Experts working at the Dutch Social Insurance Institute. Factors were collected and categorized using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF model).
Results:
Sixteen factors relevant to RTW-ES assessment in a case of DD were found, categorized in the ICF-model under activities (e.g. functional capacity), personal (e.g. competencies, attitude) and environmental domain (e.g. employer-employee relationship), or categorized under interventions, job accommodations and measures.
Conclusions:
This study shows that 16 factors are relevant in the assessment of RTW-ES in employees sick-listed due to DD. Further research is necessary to expand this knowledge to other health conditions, and to investigate the impact of these results on the quality of the RTW-ES assessment.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/103</link>
                <dc:creator>Anna Muijzer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sandra Brouwer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jan Geertzen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Johan Groothoff</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Public Health 2012, null:103</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-103</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-2458-12-103-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Public Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2458</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>103</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/102">
        <title>Heavy smoking during pregnancy as a marker for other risk factors of adverse birth outcomes: a population-based study in British Columbia, Canada</title>
        <description>Background:
Smoking during pregnancy is associated with known adverse perinatal and obstetrical outcomes as well as with socio-economic, demographic and other behavioural risk factors that independently influence outcomes. Using a large population-based perinatal registry, we assess the quantity of cigarettes smoked for the magnitude of adverse birth outcomes and also the association of other socio-economic and behavioural risk factors documented within the registry that influence pregnancy outcomes. Our goal was to determine whether number of cigarettes smoked could identify those in greatest need for comprehensive intervention programs to improve outcomes.
Methods:
Our population-based retrospective study of singleton births from 2001 to 2006 (N = 237,470) utilized data obtained from the BC Perinatal Database Registry. Smoking data, self reported at the earliest prenatal visit, was categorized as: never, former, light (1 to 4), moderate (5 to 9), or heavy smoker (10 or more per day). Crude and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using logistic regression models for smoking frequency and adverse birth outcomes. A partial proportional odds (pp-odds) model was used to determine the association between smoking status and other risk factors.
Results:
There were 233,891 singleton births with available smoking status data. A significant dose-dependent increase in risk was observed for the adverse birth outcomes small-for-gestational age, term low birth weight and intra-uterine growth restriction. Results from the pp-odds model indicate heavy smokers were more likely to have not graduated high school: AOR (95% CI) = 3.80 (3.41-4.25); be a single parent: 2.27 (2.14-2.42); have indication of drug or alcohol use: 7.65 (6.99-8.39) and 2.20 (1.88-2.59) respectively, attend fewer than 4 prenatal care visits: 1.39 (1.23-1.58), and be multiparous: 1.59 (1.51-1.68) compared to light, moderate and non-smokers combined.
Conclusion:
Our data suggests that self reports of heavy smoking early in pregnancy could be used as a marker for lifestyle risk factors that in combination with smoking influence birth outcomes. This information may be used for planning targeted intervention programs for not only smoking cessation, but potentially other support services such as nutrition and healthy pregnancy education.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/102</link>
                <dc:creator>Anders Erickson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laura Arbour</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Public Health 2012, null:102</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-102</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-2458-12-102-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Public Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2458</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>102</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/101">
        <title>Why is high-risk drinking more prevalent among men than women? Evidence from South Korea</title>
        <description>Background:
It is important to identify and quantify the factors that affect gender differences in high-risk drinking (HRD), from both an academic and a policy perspective. However, little is currently known about them. This study examines these factors and estimates the percentage contribution each makes to gender differences in HRD.
Methods:
This study analyzed information on 23,587 adults obtained from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Surveys of 1998, 2001, and 2005. It found that the prevalence of HRD was about 5 times higher among men (0.37) than women (0.08). Using a decomposition approach extended from the Oaxaca-Blinder method, we decomposed the gender difference in HRD to an &quot;overall composition effect&quot; (contributions due to gender differences in the distribution of observed socio-economic characteristics), and an &quot;overall HRD-tendency effect&quot; (contributions due to gender differences in tendencies in HRD for individuals who share socio-economic characteristics).
Results:
The HRD-tendency effect accounted for 96% of the gender difference in HRD in South Korea, whereas gender differences in observed socio-economic characteristics explained just 4% of the difference. Notably, the gender-specific HRD-tendency effect accounts for 90% of the gender difference in HRD.
Conclusion:
We came to a finding that gender-specific HRD tendency is the greatest contributor to gender differences in HRD. Therefore, to effective reduce HRD, it will be necessary to understand gender differences in socioeconomic characteristics between men and women but also take notice of such differences in sociocultural settings as they experience. And it will be also required to prepare any gender-differentiated intervention strategy for men and women.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/101</link>
                <dc:creator>Woojin Chung</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Seung Ji Lim</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sun Mi Lee</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Public Health 2012, null:101</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-101</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-2458-12-101-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Public Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2458</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>101</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

