<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?journal=bmcpharmacoltoxicol&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpharmacoltoxicol</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology</description>
        <dc:date>2013-05-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/26" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/27" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/25" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/21" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/24" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/23" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/22" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/20" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/19" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/18" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/26">
        <title>First human dose-escalation study with remogliflozin etabonate, a selective inhibitor of the sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2), in healthy subjects and in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus</title>
        <description>Background:
Remogliflozin etabonate (RE) is the prodrug of remogliflozin, a selective inhibitor of the renal sodium-dependent glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2), which could increase urine glucose excretion (UGE) and lower plasma glucose in humans.
Methods:
This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-dose, dose-escalation, crossover study is the first human trial designed to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of RE. All subjects received single oral doses of either RE or placebo separated by approximately 2 week intervals. In Part A, 10 healthy subjects participated in 5 dosing periods where they received RE (20 mg, 50 mg, 150 mg, 500 mg, or 1000 mg) or placebo (4:1 active to placebo ratio per treatment period). In Part B, 6 subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) participated in 3 dose periods where they received RE (50 mg and 500 mg) or placebo (2:1 active to placebo per treatment period). The study protocol was registered with the NIH clinical trials data base with identifier NCT01571661.
Results:
RE was generally well-tolerated; there were no serious adverse events. In both populations, RE was rapidly absorbed and converted to remogliflozin (time to maximum plasma concentration [Cmax;Tmax] approximately 1 h). Generally, exposure to remogliflozin was proportional to the administered dose. RE was rapidly eliminated (mean T1/2 of ~25 min; mean plasma T1/2 for remogliflozin was 120 min) and was independent of dose. All subjects showed dose-dependent increases in 24-hour UGE, which plateaued at approximately 200 to 250 mmol glucose with RE doses &gt;=150 mg. In T2DM subjects, increased plasma glucose following OGTT was attenuated by RE in a drug-dependent fashion, but there were no clear trends in plasma insulin. There were no apparent effects of treatment on plasma or urine electrolytes.
Conclusions:
The results support progression of RE as a potential treatment for T2DM.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01571661</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/26</link>
                <dc:creator>Anita Kapur</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robin O¿Connor-Semmes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elizabeth Hussey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Dobbins</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wenli Tao</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marcus Hompesch</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Glenn Smith</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joseph Polli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Charles James Jr</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Imao Mikoshiba</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Derek Nunez</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology 2013, null:26</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2050-6511-14-26</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2050-6511-14-26-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2050-6511</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>26</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/27">
        <title>Rifampicin-warfarin interaction leading to macroscopic hematuria: a case report and review of the literature</title>
        <description>Background:
Rifampicin remains one of the first-line drugs used in tuberculosis therapy. This drug&#180;s potential to induce the hepatic cytochrome P450 oxidative enzyme system increases the risk of drug-drug interactions. Thus, although the presence of comorbidities typically necessitates the use of multiple drugs, the co-administration of rifampicin and warfarin may lead to adverse drug events. We report a bleeding episode after termination of the co-administration of rifampicin and warfarin and detail the challenges related to international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring.Case presentationA 59-year-old Brazilian woman chronically treated with warfarin for atrial fibrillation (therapeutic INR range: 2.0-3.0) was referred to a multidisciplinary anticoagulation clinic at a university hospital. She showed anticoagulation resistance at the beginning of rifampicin therapy, as demonstrated by repeated subtherapeutic INR values. Three months of sequential increases in the warfarin dosage were necessary to reach a therapeutic INR, and frequent visits to the anticoagulation clinic were needed to educate the patient about her pharmacotherapy and to perform the warfarin dosage adjustments. The warfarin dosage also had to be doubled at the beginning of rifampicin therapy. However, four weeks after rifampicin discontinuation, an excessively high INR was observed (7.22), with three-day macroscopic hematuria and the need for an immediate reduction in the warfarin dosage. A therapeutic and stable INR was eventually attained at 50% of the warfarin dosage used by the patient during tuberculosis therapy.
Conclusions:
The present case exemplifies the influence of rifampicin therapy on warfarin dosage requirements and the increased risk of bleeding after rifampicin discontinuation. Additionally, this case highlights the need for warfarin weekly monitoring after stopping rifampicin until the maintenance dose of warfarin has decreased to the amount administered before rifampicin use. In particular, patients with cardiovascular diseases and active tuberculosis represent a group with a substantial risk of drug-drug interactions. Learning how to predict and monitor drug-drug interactions may help reduce the incidence of clinically significant adverse drug events.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/27</link>
                <dc:creator>Maria Martins</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Adriano Reis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mariana Sales</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vandack Nobre</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Ribeiro</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manoel Rocha</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Antônio Ribeiro</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology 2013, null:27</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2050-6511-14-27</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2050-6511-14-27-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2050-6511</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>27</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/25">
        <title>Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remogliflozin etabonate, a novel SGLT2 inhibitor, and metformin when co-administered in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus</title>
        <description>Background:
The sodium-dependent glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) is expressed in absorptive epithelia of the renal tubules. Remogliflozin etabonate (RE) is the prodrug of remogliflozin, the active entity that inhibits SGLT2. An inhibitor of this pathway would enhance urinary glucose excretion (UGE), and potentially improve plasma glucose concentrations in diabetic patients. RE is intended for use for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as monotherapy and in combination with existing therapies. Metformin, a dimethylbiguanide, is an effective oral antihyperglycemic agent widely used for the treatment of T2DM.
Methods:
This was a randomized, open-label, repeat-dose, two-sequence, cross-over study in 13 subjects with T2DM. Subjects were randomized to one of two treatment sequences in which they received either metformin alone, RE alone, or both over three, 3-day treatment periods separated by two non-treatment intervals of variable duration. On the evening before each treatment period, subjects were admitted and confined to the clinical site for the duration of the 3-day treatment period. Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic (urine glucose and fasting plasma glucose), and safety (adverse events, vital signs, ECG, clinical laboratory parameters including lactic acid) assessments were performed at check-in and throughout the treatment periods. Pharmacokinetic sampling occurred on Day 3 of each treatment period.
Results:
This study demonstrated the lack of effect of RE on steady state metformin pharmacokinetics. Metformin did not affect the AUC of RE, remogliflozin, or its active metabolite, GSK279782, although Cmax values were slightly lower for remogliflozin and its metabolite after co-administration with metformin compared with administration of RE alone. Metformin did not alter the pharmacodynamic effects (UGE) of RE. Concomitant administration of metformin and RE was well tolerated with minimal hypoglycemia, no serious adverse events, and no increase in lactic acid.
Conclusions:
Coadministration of metformin and RE was well tolerated in this study. The results support continued development of RE as a treatment for T2DM.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00376038</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/25</link>
                <dc:creator>Elizabeth Hussey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anita Kapur</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robin O¿Connor-Semmes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wenli Tao</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bryan Rafferty</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joseph Polli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Charles James</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Dobbins</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology 2013, null:25</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2050-6511-14-25</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2050-6511-14-25-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2050-6511</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>25</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/21">
        <title>Annual acknowledgement of manuscript reviewers</title>
        <description>Contributing reviewersIn August 2012 the BMC Series journals BMC Clinical Pharmacology and BMC Pharmacology merged to form a new title BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology. The editors of BMC Clinical Pharmacology and BMC Pharmacology would like to thank all of our reviewers who have contributed to these journals in Volume 12 (2012). The editors of BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology would also like to thank all of our reviewers who have contributed to the journal in Volume 13 (2012).</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/21</link>
                <dc:creator>Christopher Morrey</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology 2013, null:21</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2050-6511-14-21</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2050-6511-14-21-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2050-6511</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/24">
        <title>Pharmaceutical quality of seven generic Levodopa/Benserazide products compared with original Madopar&#174; / Prolopa&#174;</title>
        <description>Background:
By definition, a generic product is considered interchangeable with the innovator brand product. Controversy exists about interchangeability, and attention is predominantly directed to contaminants. In particular for chronic, degenerative conditions such as in Parkinson&#8217;s disease (PD) generic substitution remains debated among physicians, patients and pharmacists. The objective of this study was to compare the pharmaceutical quality of seven generic levodopa/benserazide hydrochloride combination products marketed in Germany with the original product (Madopar&#174; / Prolopa&#174; 125, Roche, Switzerland) in order to evaluate the potential impact of Madopar&#174; generics versus branded products for PD patients and clinicians.
Methods:
Madopar&#174; / Prolopa&#174; 125 tablets and capsules were used as reference material. The generic products tested (all 100&#160;mg/25&#160;mg formulations) included four tablet and three capsule formulations. Colour, appearance of powder (capsules), disintegration and dissolution, mass of tablets and fill mass of capsules, content, identity and amounts of impurities were assessed along with standard physical and chemical laboratory tests developed and routinely practiced at Roche facilities. Results were compared to the original &#8220;shelf-life&#8221; specifications in use by Roche.
Results:
Each of the seven generic products had one or two parameters outside the specifications. Deviations for the active ingredients ranged from +8.4% (benserazide) to &#8722;7.6% (levodopa) in two tablet formulations. Degradation products were measured in marked excess (+26.5%) in one capsule formulation. Disintegration time and dissolution for levodopa and benserazide hydrochloride at 30&#160;min were within specifications for all seven generic samples analysed, however with some outliers.
Conclusions:
Deviations for the active ingredients may go unnoticed by a new user of the generic product, but may entail clinical consequences when switching from original to generic during a long-term therapy. Degradation products may pose a safety concern. Our results should prompt caution when prescribing a generic of Madopar&#174;/Prolopa&#174;, and also invite to further investigations in view of a more comprehensive approach, both pharmaceutical and clinical.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/24</link>
                <dc:creator>Urs Gasser</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anton Fischer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jan Timmermans</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Isabelle Arnet</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology 2013, null:24</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2050-6511-14-24</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2050-6511-14-24-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2050-6511</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/23">
        <title>Role of astrocytes in manganese mediated neurotoxicity</title>
        <description>Astrocytes are responsible for numerous aspects of metabolic support, nutrition, control of the ion and neurotransmitter environment in central nervous system (CNS). Failure by astrocytes to support essential neuronal metabolic requirements plays a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of brain injury and the ensuing neuronal death. Astrocyte-neuron interactions play a central role in brain homeostasis, in particular via neurotransmitter recycling functions. Disruption of the glutamine (Gln)/glutamate (Glu) -&#947;-aminobutyric acid (GABA) cycle (GGC) between astrocytes and neurons contributes to changes in Glu-ergic and/or GABA-ergic transmission, and is associated with several neuropathological conditions, including manganese (Mn) toxicity. In this review, we discuss recent advances in support of the important roles for astrocytes in normal as well as neuropathological conditions primarily those caused by exposure to Mn.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/23</link>
                <dc:creator>Marta Sidoryk-Wegrzynowicz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Aschner</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology 2013, null:23</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2050-6511-14-23</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2050-6511-14-23-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2050-6511</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>23</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/22">
        <title>The prognostic value of blood pH and lactate and metformin concentrations in severe metformin-associated lactic acidosis</title>
        <description>AimsAnalysis of the prognostic values of blood pH and lactate and plasma metformin concentrations in severe metformin-associated lactic acidosis may help to resolve the following paradox: metformin provides impressive, beneficial effects but is also associated with life-threatening adverse effects.Research design and methodsOn the basis of 869 pharmacovigilance reports on MALA with available data on arterial pH and lactate concentration, plasma metformin concentration and outcome, we selected cases with a pH&#8201;&lt;&#8201;7.0 and a lactate concentration &gt;10&#160;mmol/L. Outcomes were compared with those described for severe metformin-independent lactic acidosis.
Results:
Fifty-six patients met the above-mentioned criteria. The mean arterial pH and lactate values were 6.75&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.17 and 23.07&#8201;&#177;&#8201;6.94&#160;mmol/L, respectively. The survival rate was 53%, even with pH values as low as 6.5 and lactate and metformin concentrations as high as 35.3&#160;mmol/L and 160&#160;mg/L (normal&#8201;&lt;&#8201;1&#160;mg/L), respectively. Survivors and non-survivors did not differ significantly in terms of the mean arterial pH and lactate concentration. The mean metformin concentration was higher in patients who subsequently died but this difference was due to a very high value (188&#160;mg/L) in one patient in this group, in whom several triggering factors were combined. Sepsis, multidrug overdoses and the presence of at least two triggering factors for lactic acidosis were observed significantly more frequently in non-survivors (p&#8201;=&#8201;0.007, 0.04, and 0.005, respectively). This contrasts with a study of metformin-independent lactic acidosis in which there were no survivors, despite less severe acidosis on average (mean pH: 6.86).
Conclusions:
In 56 cases of severe metformin-associated lactic acidosis, blood pH and lactate did not have prognostic value. One can reasonably rule out the extent of metformin accumulation as a prognostic factor. Ultimately, the determinants of metformin-associated lactic acidosis appear to be the nature and number of triggering factors. Strikingly, most patients survived - despite a mean pH that is incompatible with a favorable outcome under other circumstances.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/22</link>
                <dc:creator>Farshad Kajbaf</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jean-Daniel Lalau</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology 2013, null:22</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2050-6511-14-22</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2050-6511-14-22-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2050-6511</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/20">
        <title>Scottish and Newcastle Antiemetic Pre-treatment for paracetamol poisoning study (SNAP)</title>
        <description>Background:
Paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning remains the commonest cause of acute liver injury in Europe and North America. The intravenous (IV) N-acetylcysteine (NAC) regimen introduced in the 1970s has continued effectively unchanged. This involves 3 different infusion regimens (dose and time) lasting over 20&#8201;hours. The same weight-related dose of NAC is used irrespective of paracetamol dose. Complications include frequent nausea and vomiting, anaphylactoid reactions and dosing errors. We designed a randomised controlled study investigating the efficacy of antiemetic pre-treatment (ondansetron) using standard NAC and a modified, shorter, regimen.Methods/DesignWe designed a double-blind trial using a 2 &#215; 2 factorial design involving four parallel groups. Pre-treatment with ondansetron 4&#8201;mg IV was compared against placebo on nausea and vomiting following the standard (20.25&#8201;h) regimen, or a novel 12&#8201;h NAC regimen in paracetamol poisoning. Each delivered 300&#8201;mg/kg bodyweight NAC. Randomisation was stratified on: paracetamol dose, perceived risk factors, and time to presentation. The primary outcome was the incidence of nausea and vomiting following NAC. In addition the frequency of anaphylactoid reactions and end of treatment liver function documented. Where clinically necessary further doses of NAC were administered as per standard UK protocols at the end of the first antidote course.DiscussionThis study is primarily designed to test the efficacy of prophylactic anti-emetic therapy with ondansetron, but is the first attempt to formally examine new methods of administering IV NAC in paracetamol overdose. We anticipate, from volunteer studies, that nausea and vomiting will be less frequent with the new NAC regimen. In addition as anaphylactoid response appears related to plasma concentrations of both NAC and paracetamol anaphylactoid reactions should be less likely. This study is not powered to assess the relative efficacy of the two NAC regimens, however it will give useful information to power future studies. As the first formal randomised clinical trial in this patient group in over 30&#8201;years this study will also provide information to support further studies in patients in paracetamol overdose, particularly, when linked with modern novel biomarkers of liver damage, patients at different toxicity risk.Trial registrationEudraCT number 2009-017800-10, ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT01050270</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/20</link>
                <dc:creator>H Thanacoody</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alasdair Gray</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James Dear</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Judy Coyle</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Euan Sandilands</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Webb</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steff Lewis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Eddleston</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Simon Thomas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>D Bateman</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology 2013, null:20</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2050-6511-14-20</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2050-6511-14-20-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2050-6511</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/19">
        <title>Cotrimoxazole plasma levels, dialyzer clearance and total removal by extended dialysis in a patient with acute kidney injury: risk of under-dosing using current dosing recommendations</title>
        <description>Background:
Dosing of antibiotics in critically ill patients is challenging. It becomes even more difficult if renal or hepatic impairment ensue. Modern means of renal replacement therapy are capable of removing antibiotics to a higher rate than decades ago, leaving clinicians with a high degree of uncertainty concerning the dose of antibiotics in this patient population. Cotrimoxazole, a combination of trimethoprim (TMP) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) is frequently used in the treatment of several infections including Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP).Case presentationHere we describe a patient with acute kidney injury in which we investigated the TMP and SMX levels during the course of an ICU stay. Cotrimoxazole was administered every six hours i.v. in a dose of TMP/SMX 15/75 mg/kg/day. Extended dialysis was performed with a high-flux dialyzer. Blood samples, as well as pre- and postdialyzer samples and aliquots of the collected spent dialysate were collected.Observed peak concentrations (Cmax) were 7.51 mg/l for TMP and 80.80 mg/l for SMX. Decline of blood levels during extended dialysis (TMP 64%; SMX 84%) was mainly due to removal by the dialysis procedure, illustrated by the high dialyzer clearances (median of 4 extended dialysis sessions: TMP 94.0 / SMX 51.0 ml/min), as well as by the absolute amount of both substances in the collected spent dialysate (median of 6 extended dialysis sessions: TMP 556 mg / SMX 130 mg). Within the limitation of a case report our data from 4 consecutive extended dialysis sessions suggest that this procedure substantially removes both TMP and SMX.
Conclusions:
Dose reduction, which is usually advocated in patients with acute kidney injury under renal replacement therapy, might lead to significant under-dosing. Pharmacokinetic studies for TMP/SMX dosing in this patient population are necessary to allow adequate dosing.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/19</link>
                <dc:creator>Christian Clajus</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>W Kühn-Velten</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julius Schmidt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Johan Lorenzen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Pietsch</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gernot Beutel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jan Kielstein</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology 2013, null:19</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2050-6511-14-19</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2050-6511-14-19-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2050-6511</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/18">
        <title>Anvirzel&#191; in combination with cisplatin in breast, colon, lung, prostate, melanoma and pancreatic cancer cell lines</title>
        <description>Background:
Platinum derivatives are used widely for the treatment of many cancers. However, the toxicity that is observed makes imperative the need for new drugs, or new combinations. Anvirzel&#8482; is an extract which has been demonstrated with experimental data that displays anticancer activity. The aim of the present study is to determine whether the combination of Cisplatin and Anvirzel&#8482; has a synergistic effect against different types of cancer.Materials and methodsTo measure the efficacy of treatment with Cisplatin and Anvirzel&#8482;, methyl-tetrazolium dye (MTT) chemosensitivity assays were used incorporating established human cancer cell lines. Measurements were performed in triplicates, three times, using different incubation times and different concentrations of the two formulations in combination or on their own. t-test was used for statistical analysis.
Results:
In the majority of the cell lines tested, lower concentrations of Anvirzel&#8482; induced a synergistic effect when combined with low concentrations of Cisplatin after an incubation period of 48 to 72&#160;h. The combination of Anvirzel&#8482;/Cisplatin showed anti-proliferative effects against a wide range of tumours.
Conclusion:
The results showed that the combination of Anvirzel&#8482; and Cisplatin is more effective than monotherapy, even when administered at low concentrations; thus, undesirable toxic effects can be avoided.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/14/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Panagiotis Apostolou</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria Toloudi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marina Chatziioannou</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eleni Ioannou</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dennis Knocke</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joe Nester</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dimitrios Komiotis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ioannis Papasotiriou</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology 2013, null:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-03-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2050-6511-14-18</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2050-6511-14-18-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2050-6511</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-03-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
