<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?journal=bmcnurs&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Nursing - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcnurs/</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by BMC Nursing</description>
        <dc:date>2009-07-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/13" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/12" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/6">
        <title>A randomized cross-over study of the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation among females performing 30:2 and Hands-Only cardiopulomary resuscitation </title>
        <description>Background:
Hands-Only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is recommended for use on adult victims of witnessed out-of-hospital (OOH) sudden cardiac arrest or in instances where rescuers cannot perform ventilations while maintaining minimally interrupted, quality compressions. Promotion of Hands-Only CPR should improve the incidence of bystander CPR and, subsequently, survival from OOH cardiac arrest; but, little is known about a rescuer&apos;s ability to deliver continuous chest compressions of adequate rate and depth for periods typical of emergency services response time. This study evaluated chest compression rate and depth as subjects performed Hands-Only CPR for 10 minutes.  For comparison purposes, each also performed chest compressions with ventilations (30:2) CPR.  It also evaluated fatigue and changes in body biomechanics associated with each type of CPR.
Methods:
Twenty healthy female volunteers certified in basic life support performed Hands-Only CPR and 30:2 CPR on a manikin. A mixed model repeated measures cross-over design evaluated chest compression rate and depth, changes in fatigue (chest compression force, perceived exertion, and blood lactate level), and changes in electromyography and joint kinetics and kinematics.
Results:
All subjects completed 10 minutes of 30:2 CPR; but, only 17 completed 10 minutes of Hands-Only CPR.  Rate, average depth, percentage at least 38mm deep, and force of compressions were significantly lower in Hands-Only CPR than in 30:2 CPR. Rates were maintained; but, compression depth and force declined significantly from beginning to end CPR with most decrement occurring in the first two minutes. Perceived effort and joint torque changes were significantly greater in Hands-Only CPR. Performance was not influenced by age.
Conclusions:
Hands-Only CPR required greater effort and was harder to sustain than 30:2 CPR. It is not known whether the observed greater decrement in chest compression depth associated with Hands-Only CPR would offset the potential physiological benefit of having fewer interruptions in compressions during an actual resuscitation. The dramatic decrease in compression depth in the first two minutes reinforces current recommendations that rescuers take turns performing compressions, switching every two minutes or less. Further study is recommended to determine the impact of real-time feedback and dispatcher coaching on rescuer performance.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Cynthia Trowbridge</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jesal Parekh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Ricard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jerald Potts</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>W Patrickson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carolyn Cason</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/5">
        <title>Practice nursing in Australia: A review of education and career pathways </title>
        <description>Background:
Nurses in Australia are often not educated in their pre registration years to meet the needs of primary care. Careers in primary care may not be as attractive to nursing graduates as high-tech settings such as intensive or acute care. Yet, it is in primary care that increasingly complex health problems are managed. The Australian government has invested in incentives for general practices to employ practice nurses. However, no policy framework has been developed for practice nursing to support career development and post-registration education and training programs are developed in an ad hoc manner and are not underpinned by core professional competencies. This paper reports on a systematic review undertaken to establish the available evidence on education models and career pathways with a view to enhancing recruitment and retention of practice nurses in primary care in Australia.
Methods:
Search terms describing education models, career pathways and policy associated with primary care (practice) nursing were established. These search terms were used to search electronic databases. The search strategy identified 1394 citations of which 408 addressed one or more of the key search terms on policy, education and career pathways. Grey literature from the UK and New Zealand internet sites were sourced and examined. The UK and New Zealand Internet sites were selected because they have well established and advanced developments in education and career pathways for practice nurses.Two reviewers examined titles, abstracts and studies, based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Disagreement between the reviewers was resolved by consensus or by a third reviewer.
Results:
Significant advances have been made in New Zealand and the UK towards strengthening frameworks for primary care nursing education and career pathways. However, in Australia there is no policy at national level prepare nurses to work in primary care sector and no framework for education or career pathways for nurses working in that sector.
Conclusion:
There is a need for national training standards and a process of accreditation for practice nursing in Australia to support the development of a responsive and sustainable nursing workforce in primary care and to provide quality education and career pathways.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Rhian Parker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Helen Keleher</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karen Francis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Omar Abdulwadud</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/4">
        <title>Competency, confidence and conflicting evidence: key issues affecting health visitors&apos; use of research evidence in practice</title>
        <description>Background:
Health visitors play a pivotal position in providing parents with up-to-date evidence-based care on child health. The recent controversy over the safety of the MMR vaccine has drawn attention to the difficulties they face when new research which raises doubts about current guidelines and practices is published. In the aftermath of the MMR controversy, this paper investigates the sources health visitors use to find out about new research evidence on immunisation and examines barriers and facilitators to using evidence in practice. It also assesses health visitors&apos; confidence in using research evidence.
Methods:
Health visitors were recruited from the 2007 UK Community Practitioners&apos; and Health Visitors&apos; Association conference. All delegates were eligible to complete the questionnaire if in their current professional role they advise parents about childhood immunisation or administer vaccines to children. Of 228 who were eligible, 185 completed the survey (81.1%).
Results:
These health visitors used a wide range of resources to find out about new research evidence on childhood immunisation. Popular sources included information leaflets and publications, training days, nursing journals and networking with colleagues. A lack of time was cited as the main barrier to searching for new evidence. The most common reason given for not using research in practice was a perception of conflicting research evidence. Understanding the evidence was a key facilitator. Health visitors expressed less confidence about searching and explaining research on childhood immunisation than evidence on weaning and a baby&apos;s sleep position.
Conclusion:
Even motivated health visitors feel they lack the time and, in some cases, the skills to locate and appraise research evidence. This research suggests that of the provision of already-appraised research would help to keep busy health professionals informed, up-to-date and confident in responding to public concerns, particularly when there is apparently conflicting evidence. Health visitors&apos; relative lack of confidence about research on immunisation suggests there is still a job to be done in rebuilding confidence in evidence on childhood immunisation. Further research on what makes evidence more comprehensible, convincing and useable would contribute to understanding how to bridge the gulf between evidence and practice.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Shona Hilton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Helen Bedford</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Calnan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kate Hunt</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-04-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/3">
        <title>A national cross-sectional study on nurses&apos; intent to leave and job satisfaction in Lebanon: implications for policy and practice</title>
        <description>Background:
Lebanon is perceived to be suffering from excessive nurse migration, low job satisfaction, poor retention and high turnover. Little is known about the magnitude of nurse migration and predictors of intent to leave. The objective of this study is to determine the extent of nurses&apos; intent to leave and examine the impact of job satisfaction on intent to leave. Intent to leave was explored to differentiate between nurses who intend to leave their current hospital and those intending to leave the country.
Methods:
A cross-sectional design was used to survey nurses currently practicing in Lebanese hospitals. A total of 1,793 nurses employed in 69 hospitals were surveyed. Questions included those relating to demographic characteristics, intent to leave, and the McCloskey Mueller Satisfaction Scale. Univariate descriptive statistics were conducted on sample&apos;s demographic characteristics including gender, age, marital status and educational level. Bivariate associations between intent to leave and demographic characteristics were tested using Pearson Chi-square. Differences in satisfaction scores between nurses with and without intent to leave were tested using t-test and ANOVA f-test. A multinomial logistic regression model was created to predict intent to leave the hospital and intent to leave the country.
Results:
An alarming 67.5% reported intent to leave within the next 1 to 3 years, many of whom disclosed intent to leave the country (36.7%). Within nurses who reported an intent to leave the hospital but stay in Lebanon, 22.1% plan to move to a different health organization in Lebanon, 29.4% plan to leave the profession and 48.5% had other plans. Nurses reported being least satisfied with extrinsic rewards. A common predictor of intent to leave the hospital and the country was dissatisfaction with extrinsic rewards. Other predictors of intent to leave (country or hospital) included age, gender, marital status, degree type, and dissatisfaction with scheduling, interaction opportunities, and control and responsibility.
Conclusion:
Study findings demonstrate linkages between job satisfaction, intent to leave, and migration in a country suffering from a nursing shortage. Findings can be used by health care managers and policy makers in managing job satisfaction, intent to leave and nurse migration.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Fadi El-Jardali</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hani Dimassi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nuhad Dumit</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Diana Jamal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gladys Mouro</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-03-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-03-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/2">
        <title>Practice Nurses&apos; views of their role in the management of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalagic Encephalitis: a qualitative study</title>
        <description>Background:
NICE guidelines suggest that patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalitis (CFS/ME) should be managed in Primary Care. Practice Nurses are increasingly being involved in the management of long-term conditions, so are likely to also have a growing role in managing CFS/ME. However their attitudes to, and experiences of patients with CFS/ME and its management must be explored to understand what barriers may exist in developing their role for this group of patients. The aim of this study was to explore Practice Nurses&apos; understanding and beliefs about CFS/ME and its management.
Methods:
Semi-structured interviews with 29 Practice Nurses. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and an iterative approach used to develop themes from the dataset.
Results:
Practice nurses had limited understanding about CFS/ME which had been largely gained through contact with patients, friends, personal experiences and the media rather than formal training. They had difficulty seeing CFS/ME as a long term condition. They did identify a potential role they could have in management of CFS/ME but devalued their own skills in psychological intervention, and suggested counselling would be an appropriate therapeutic option. They recognised a need for further training and on going supervision from both medical and psychological colleagues. Some viewed the condition as contentious and held pejorative views about CFS/ME. Such scepticism and negative attitudes will be a significant barrier to the management of patients with CFS/ME in primary care.
Conclusion:
The current role of Practice Nurses in the ongoing management of patients with CFS/ME is limited. Practice Nurses have little understanding of the evidence-base for treatment of CFS/ME, particularly psychological therapies, describing management options in terms of advice giving, self-help or counselling. Practice Nurses largely welcomed the potential development of their role in this area, but identified barriers and training needs which must be addressed to enable them to feel confident managing of patients with this condition. Training must begin by addressing negative attitudes to patients with CFS/ME.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Carolyn Chew-Graham</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rebecca Dixon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jonathan Shaw</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nina Smyth</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karina Lovell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sarah Peters</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-01-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-01-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/1">
        <title>Older cancer patients&apos; information and support needs surrounding treatment: An evaluation through the eyes of patients, relatives and professionals</title>
        <description>Background:
Providing cancer patients with adequate treatment information is important for patients&apos; health, well-being and satisfaction. Nurses play an important role in patient education. So far, few studies focused on the specific information needs of older cancer patients surrounding chemotherapy treatment. Given the growing incidence of cancer among older individuals, insight in these needs is crucial. This article describes the views of older cancer patients, their relatives and professionals on older patients&apos; specific communication needs regarding chemotherapy treatment.
Methods:
A qualitative design was used. Five focus group interviews were held with older cancer patients and their partners (two groups) and professionals with a background in nursing, oncology, gerontology and/or patient-provider communication (three groups). In addition, face to face in-depth interviews were conducted with older cancer patients. A total number of 38 patients and relatives participated, with a mean age of 67.6 years. The focus groups and interviews were audio-recorded for subsequent transcription and analysis.
Results:
Older people have more difficulties processing and remembering information than younger ones. A trustful environment appears to be a prerequisite for reflection of older patients on the information provided and individualized information is essential to enhance memory of information. However, the results show that both patients and professionals experienced insufficient exploration of the patients&apos; personal situation and individual information needs. Patients also strengthened the importance of sensitive communication, e.g. showing empathy en emotional support, throughout the continuum of cancer care. Moreover, potential areas of improvement were identified, including engaging the patients&apos; relatives and encouraging patients and relatives to ask questions.
Conclusion:
Patient education should be more tailored to older cancer patients&apos; individual information and support needs and abilities by exploring the required amount and content of information, treatment goals and expectations. Nurses can establish a trustful environment by showing empathy and emotional support. Recommendations are given to enhance recall of information in older patients; information giving should be more structured by summarizing and repeating the most important, personally relevant information. To adapt to specific information needs, communication training for nurses and the use of aids such as a question prompt sheet could be useful tools.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Elise Posma</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julia van Weert</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jesse Jansen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jozien Bensing</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-01-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-01-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/15">
        <title>Young carers in Germany: to live on as normal as possible - a grounded theory study</title>
        <description>Background:
In contrast to a growing body of research on the situation of adult family care givers, in Germany hardly anything is known about the situation of children and teenagers who are involved in the care of their relatives.
Methods:
In this Grounded Theory study 81 semi structured interviews have been carried out with children and their parents in 34 families, in which one member is chronically ill. 41 children and 41 parents participated and the sample is heterogeneous and diverse.
Results:
On the one hand, there is the phenomenon &apos;keeping the family together&quot;, which describes how families themselves cope with the chronic illness and also, which tasks to what extent are being shifted and redistributed within the family in order to manage daily life. Influencing factors, the children&apos;s motives as well as the impact on the children also belong to this phenomenon. The second phenomenon &apos;to live a normal course of life&apos; describes concrete wishes and expectations of support for the family to manage the hindered daily life. These two phenomena linked together constitute the &apos;model of experience and construction of familial care, in which children take over an active role&apos;.
Conclusion:
It will be discussed, that the more families are in dire need of support, the more their distress becomes invisible, furthermore, that management of chronic illness is a process, in which the entire family is involved, and thus needs to be considered, and finally, that young carer&apos;s relief is not possible without relief of their parents.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Sabine Metzing-Blau</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wilfried Schnepp</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2008, 7:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-12-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-7-15</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-12-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/14">
        <title>Prediction of postoperative pain after radical prostatectomy</title>
        <description>Background:
There is a belief that the amount of pain perceived is merely directly proportional to the extent of injury. The intensity of postoperative pain is however influenced by multiple factors aside from the extent of trauma. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the relationship between preoperative factors that have been shown to predict postoperative pain and the self-reports of pain intensity in a population of 155 men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP), and also to investigate if previous pain score could predict the subsequent pain score.
Methods:
The correlation between potential pain predictors and the postoperative pain experiences during three postoperative days was tested (Pitmans&apos; test). By use of a logistic regression analysis the probability that a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at one occasion would exceed 30 mm or 70 mm was studied, depending on previous VAS score, age, depression and pain treatment method.
Results:
Age was found to be a predictor of VAS &gt; 30 mm, with younger patients at higher risk for pain, and preoperative depression predicted VAS &gt; 70 mm. The probability that VAS would exceed 30 mm and 70 mm was predicted only by previous VAS value. Day two however, patients with epidural analgesia were at higher risk for experiencing pain than patients with intrathecal or systemic opioid analgesia.
Conclusion:
The results show that it would be meaningful to identify RP patients at high risk for severe postoperative pain; i.e. younger and/or depressive patients who might benefit from a more aggressive therapy instituted in the very early postoperative period.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/14</link>
                <dc:creator>Kerstin Wickstrom Ene</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gunnar Nordberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bjorn Sjostrom</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ingrid Bergh</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2008, 7:14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-12-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-7-14</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-12-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/13">
        <title>Night nursing - staff&apos;s working experiences</title>
        <description>Background:
Although the duties and working conditions of registered, and enrolled nurses have previously been described from different perspectives, they have not been examined from the night nursing aspect. The aim of the study was to describe the night nursing staff&apos;s working experiences.
Methods:
The design of the study is qualitative and descriptive. Interviews were conducted with 10 registered and 10 enrolled nurses working as night staff at a Swedish University Hospital. The interview guide was thematic and concerned the content of their tasks, as well as the working conditions that constitute night nursing. In addition, the interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using content analysis.
Results:
The night duties have to be performed under difficult conditions that include working silently in dimmed lighting, and making decisions when fatigue threatens. According to the night staff, its main goals are to provide the patients with rest and simultaneously ensure qualified care. Furthermore, the night nursing staff must prepare the ward for the daytime activities.
Conclusion:
The most important point is the team work, which developed between the registered and enrolled nurses and how necessary this team work is when working at night. In order for nurses working at night to be fully appreciated, the communication between day and night staff in health care organizations needs to be developed. Furthermore, it is important to give the night staff opportunities to use its whole field of competence.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/13</link>
                <dc:creator>Kerstin Nilsson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ann-Mari Campbell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ewa Pilhammar Andersson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2008, 7:13</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-10-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-7-13</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-10-31T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/12">
        <title>Development and evaluation of a cancer-related fatigue patient education program: protocol of a randomized controlled trial</title>
        <description>Background:
Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and its impact on patients&apos; quality of life has been an increasing subject of research. However, in Germany there is a lack of evidence-based interventions consistent with the multidimensional character of fatigue. The objective of this study is to develop and evaluate a self-management program for disease-free cancer patients to cope with CRF.
Methods:
Based on evidence extracted from a literature review, a curriculum for the self-management program was elaborated. The curriculum was reviewed and validated by an interdisciplinary expert group and the training-modules will be pretested with a small number of participants and discussed in terms of feasibility and acceptance.To determine the efficacy of the program a randomised controlled trial will be carried out: 300 patients will be recruited from oncological practices in Bremen, Germany, and will be allocated to intervention or control group. The intervention group participates in the program, whereas the control group receives standard care and the opportunity to take part in the program after the end of the follow-up (waiting control group). Primary outcome measure is the level of fatigue, secondary outcome measures are quality of life, depression, anxiety, self-efficacy and physical activity. Data will be collected before randomisation, after intervention, and after a follow-up of 6 months.DiscussionBecause there are no comparable self-management programs for cancer survivors with fatigue, the development of the curriculum has been complex; therefore, the critical appraisal by the experts was an important step to validate the program and their contributions have been integrated into the curriculum. The experts appreciated the program as filling a gap in outpatient cancer care.If the results of the evaluation prove to be satisfactory, the outpatient care of cancer patients can be broadened and supplemented.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials NCT00552552</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Nina Stuhldreher</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karl Reif</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ulrike de Vries</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stefan Gorres</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Franz Petermann</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2008, 7:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-07-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-7-12</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-07-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
