<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?journal=bmcnurs&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Nursing - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcnurs/</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by BMC Nursing</description>
        <dc:date>2009-09-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/5/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/7" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/6">
        <title>A qualitative study of nursing student experiences of clinical practice</title>
        <description>Background:
Nursing student&apos;s experiences of their clinical practice provide greater insight to develop an effective clinical teaching strategy in nursing education. The main objective of this study was to investigate student nurses&apos; experience about their clinical practice.
Methods:
Focus groups were used to obtain students&apos; opinion and experiences about their clinical practice. 90 baccalaureate nursing students at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery) were selected randomly from two hundred students and were arranged in 9 groups of ten students. To analyze the data the method used to code and categories focus group data were adapted from approaches to qualitative data analysis.
Results:
Four themes emerged from the focus group data. From the students&apos; point of view,&quot; initial clinical anxiety&quot;, &quot;theory-practice gap&quot;,&quot; clinical supervision&quot;, professional role&quot;, were considered as important factors in clinical experience.
Conclusion:
The result of this study showed that nursing students were not satisfied with the clinical component of their education. They experienced anxiety as a result of feeling incompetent and lack of professional nursing skills and knowledge to take care of various patients in the clinical setting.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Farkhondeh Sharif</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sara Masoumi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2005, 4:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2005-11-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-4-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2005-11-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/1">
        <title>Managing change in the nursing handover from traditional to bedside handover - a case study from Mauritius</title>
        <description>Background:
The shift handover forms an important part of the communication process that takes place twice within the nurses&apos; working day in the gynaecological ward. This paper addresses the topic of implementing a new system of bedside handover, which puts patients central to the whole process of managing care and also addresses some of the shortcomings of the traditional handover system.
Methods:
A force field analysis in terms of the driving forces had shown that there was dissatisfaction with the traditional method of handover which had led to an increase in the number of critical incidents and complaints from patients, relatives and doctors. The restraining forces identified were a fear of accountability, lack of confidence and that this change would lead to more work. A 3 &#8211; step planned change model consisting of unfreezing, moving and refreezing was used to guide us through the change process. Resistance to change was managed by creating a climate of open communication where stakeholders were allowed to voice opinions, share concerns, insights, and ideas thereby actively participating in decision making.
Results:
An evaluation had shown that this process was successfully implemented to the satisfaction of patients, and staff in general.
Conclusion:
This successful change should encourage other nurses to become more proactive in identifying areas for change management in order to improve our health care system.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Hemant Kassean</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Zaheeda Jagoo</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2005, 4:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2005-01-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-4-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2005-01-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/8">
        <title>Women with postpartum depression: &quot;my husband&quot; stories</title>
        <description>Background:
The research on Postpartum Depression (PPD) to date suggests that there is a knowledge gap regarding women&apos;s perception of their partners&apos; role as carer and care activities they perform. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to describe women&apos;s understanding of their partners&apos; or husbands&apos; involvement in the midst of PPD.
Methods:
This study used interview data from a larger study of northern and rural Ontario women&apos;s stories of help-seeking for PPD. The interpretive description approach was used to illustrate the complexity of women&apos;s spousal connections in PPD. Data from a purposive community sample of 27 women who self-identified as having been diagnosed with PPD was used. From the verbatim transcribed interviews a number of data excerpts were identified and labeled as &quot;my husband&quot; stories. Narrative analysis was employed to examine these stories.
Results:
During this time of vulnerability, the husbands&apos; physical, emotional and cognitive availability positively contributed to the women&apos;s functioning and self-appraisals as wife and mother. Their representations of their husbands&apos; &apos;doing for&apos; and/or &apos;being with&apos; promoted their well-being and ultimately protected the family.
Conclusion:
Given that husbands are perceived to be central in mitigating women&apos;s suffering with PPD, the consistent implementation of a triad orientation, that includes woman, child and partner rather than a more traditional and convenient dyadic orientation, is warranted in comprehensive postpartum care. Finally, this study contributes a theoretical understanding of responsive as well as reactive connections between women and family members during the postpartum period.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Phyllis Montgomery</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Patricia Bailey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sheri Johnson Purdon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susan Snelling</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carol Kauppi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/9">
        <title>Iranian nurses&apos; constraint for research utilization</title>
        <description>Background:
This paper identifies the views of Iranian clinical nurses regarding the utilization of nursing research in practice. There is a need to understand what restricts Iranian clinical nurses to use research findings. The aim of this study was to identify practicing nurses&apos; view of aspects which they perceived constrain them from research utilization that summarizes and uses research findings to address a nursing practice problem.
Methods:
Data were collected during 6 months by means of face-to face interviews follow by one focus group. Analysis was undertaken using a qualitative content analysis.
Results:
Findings disclosed some key themes perceived by nurses to restrict them to use research findings: level of support require to be research active, to be research minded, the extent of nurses knowledge and skills about research and research utilization, level of educational preparation relating to using research, administration and executive challenges in clinical setting, and theory-practice gap.
Conclusion:
This study identifies constraints that require to be overcome for clinical nurses to actively get involved in research utilization. In this study nurses were generally interested to use research findings. However they felt restricted because of lack of time, lack of peer and manager support and limited knowledge and skills of the research process. This study also confirms that research utilization and the change to research nursing practice are complex issues which require both organizational and educational efforts.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Mahvash Salsali</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Neda Mehrdad</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-9</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/6">
        <title>A randomized cross-over study of the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation among females performing 30:2 and Hands-Only cardiopulomary resuscitation </title>
        <description>Background:
Hands-Only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is recommended for use on adult victims of witnessed out-of-hospital (OOH) sudden cardiac arrest or in instances where rescuers cannot perform ventilations while maintaining minimally interrupted quality compressions. Promotion of Hands-Only CPR should improve the incidence of bystander CPR and, subsequently, survival from OOH cardiac arrest; but, little is known about a rescuer&apos;s ability to deliver continuous chest compressions of adequate rate and depth for periods typical of emergency services response time. This study evaluated chest compression rate and depth as subjects performed Hands-Only CPR for 10 minutes. For comparison purposes, each also performed chest compressions with ventilations (30:2) CPR. It also evaluated fatigue and changes in body biomechanics associated with each type of CPR.
Methods:
Twenty healthy female volunteers certified in basic life support performed Hands-Only CPR and 30:2 CPR on a manikin. A mixed model repeated measures cross-over design evaluated chest compression rate and depth, changes in fatigue (chest compression force, perceived exertion, and blood lactate level), and changes in electromyography and joint kinetics and kinematics.
Results:
All subjects completed 10 minutes of 30:2 CPR; but, only 17 completed 10 minutes of Hands-Only CPR. Rate, average depth, percentage at least 38 millimeters deep, and force of compressions were significantly lower in Hands-Only CPR than in 30:2 CPR. Rates were maintained; but, compression depth and force declined significantly from beginning to end CPR with most decrement occurring in the first two minutes. Perceived effort and joint torque changes were significantly greater in Hands-Only CPR. Performance was not influenced by age.
Conclusion:
Hands-Only CPR required greater effort and was harder to sustain than 30:2 CPR. It is not known whether the observed greater decrement in chest compression depth associated with Hands-Only CPR would offset the potential physiological benefit of having fewer interruptions in compressions during an actual resuscitation. The dramatic decrease in compression depth in the first two minutes reinforces current recommendations that rescuers take turns performing compressions, switching every two minutes or less. Further study is recommended to determine the impact of real-time feedback and dispatcher coaching on rescuer performance.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Cynthia Trowbridge</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jesal Parekh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Ricard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jerald Potts</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>W Patrickson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carolyn Cason</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/6">
        <title>Nursing students motivation toward their studies - a survey study</title>
        <description>Background:
This study focuses on Swedish nursing students&apos; motivation toward their studies during their three year academic studies. Earlier studies show the importance of motivation for study commitment and result. The aim was to analyze nursing students&apos; estimation of their degree of motivation during different semester during their education and to identify reasons for the degree of motivation.
Methods:
A questionnaire asking for scoring motivation and what influenced the degree of motivation was distributed to students enrolled in a nursing programme. 315 students who studied at different semesters participated. Analyzes were made by statistical calculation and content analysis.
Results:
The mean motivation score over all semesters was 6.3 (ranked between 0&#8211;10) and differed significantly during the semesters with a tendency to lower score during the 5th semester. Students (73/315) with motivation score &lt;4 reported explanations such as negative opinion about the organisation of the programme, attitude towards the studies, life situation and degree of difficulty/demand on studies. Students (234/315) with motivation score &gt;6 reported positive opinions to becoming a nurse (125/234), organization of the programme and attitude to the studies. The mean score value for the motivation ranking differed significantly between male (5.8) and female (6.8) students.
Conclusion:
Conclusions to be drawn are that nursing students mainly grade their motivation positive distributed different throughout their entire education. The main motivation factor was becoming a nurse. This study result highlights the need of understanding the students&apos; situation and their need of tutorial support.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Kerstin Nilsson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Margareta Warren Stomberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2008, 7:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-04-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-7-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-04-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/5/3">
        <title>Patient advocacy: barriers and facilitators</title>
        <description>Background:
During the two recent decades, advocacy has been a topic of much debate in the nursing profession. Although advocacy has embraced a crucial role for nurses, its extent is often limited in practice. While a variety of studies have been generated all over the world, barriers and facilitators in the patient advocacy have not been completely identified. This article presents the findings of a study exploring the barriers and facilitators influencing the role of advocacy among Iranian nurses.MethodThis study was conducted by grounded theory method. Participants were 24 Iranian registered nurses working in a large university hospital in Tehran, Iran. Semi-structured interviews were used for data collection. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and simultaneously Constant comparative analysis was used according to the Strauss and Corbin method.
Results:
Through data analysis, several main themes emerged to describe the factors that hindered or facilitated patient advocacy. Nurses in this study identified powerlessness, lack of support, law, code of ethics and motivation, limited communication, physicians leading, risk of advocacy, royalty to peers, and insufficient time to interact with patients and families as barriers to advocacy. As for factors that facilitated nurses to act as a patient advocate, it was found that the nature of nurse-patient relationship, recognizing patients&apos; needs, nurses&apos; responsibility, physician as a colleague, and nurses&apos; knowledge and skills could be influential in adopting the advocacy role.
Conclusion:
Participants believed that in this context taking an advocacy role is difficult for nurses due to the barriers mentioned. Therefore, they make decisions and act as a patient&apos;s advocate in any situation concerning patient needs and status of barriers and facilitators. In most cases, they can not act at an optimal level; instead they accept only what they can do, which we called &apos;limited advocacy&apos; in this study. It is concluded that advocacy is contextually complex, and is a controversial and risky component of the nursing practice. Further research is needed to determine the possibility of a correlation between identified barriers/ facilitators and the use of advocacy.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/5/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Reza Negarandeh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fatemeh Oskouie</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fazlollah Ahmadi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mansoure Nikravesh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ingalill Rahm Hallberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2006, 5:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-5-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-03-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/1">
        <title>Older cancer patients&apos; information and support needs surrounding treatment: An evaluation through the eyes of patients, relatives and professionals</title>
        <description>Background:
Providing cancer patients with adequate treatment information is important for patients&apos; health, well-being and satisfaction. Nurses play an important role in patient education. So far, few studies focused on the specific information needs of older cancer patients surrounding chemotherapy treatment. Given the growing incidence of cancer among older individuals, insight in these needs is crucial. This article describes the views of older cancer patients, their relatives and professionals on older patients&apos; specific communication needs regarding chemotherapy treatment.
Methods:
A qualitative design was used. Five focus group interviews were held with older cancer patients and their partners (two groups) and professionals with a background in nursing, oncology, gerontology and/or patient-provider communication (three groups). In addition, face to face in-depth interviews were conducted with older cancer patients. A total number of 38 patients and relatives participated, with a mean age of 67.6 years. The focus groups and interviews were audio-recorded for subsequent transcription and analysis.
Results:
Older people have more difficulties processing and remembering information than younger ones. A trustful environment appears to be a prerequisite for reflection of older patients on the information provided and individualized information is essential to enhance memory of information. However, the results show that both patients and professionals experienced insufficient exploration of the patients&apos; personal situation and individual information needs. Patients also strengthened the importance of sensitive communication, e.g. showing empathy en emotional support, throughout the continuum of cancer care. Moreover, potential areas of improvement were identified, including engaging the patients&apos; relatives and encouraging patients and relatives to ask questions.
Conclusion:
Patient education should be more tailored to older cancer patients&apos; individual information and support needs and abilities by exploring the required amount and content of information, treatment goals and expectations. Nurses can establish a trustful environment by showing empathy and emotional support. Recommendations are given to enhance recall of information in older patients; information giving should be more structured by summarizing and repeating the most important, personally relevant information. To adapt to specific information needs, communication training for nurses and the use of aids such as a question prompt sheet could be useful tools.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Elise Posma</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julia van Weert</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jesse Jansen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jozien Bensing</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-01-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-01-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/5">
        <title>Practice nursing in Australia: A review of education and career pathways </title>
        <description>Background:
Nurses in Australia are often not educated in their pre registration years to meet the needs of primary care. Careers in primary care may not be as attractive to nursing graduates as high-tech settings such as intensive or acute care. Yet, it is in primary care that increasingly complex health problems are managed. The Australian government has invested in incentives for general practices to employ practice nurses. However, no policy framework has been developed for practice nursing to support career development and post-registration education and training programs are developed in an ad hoc manner and are not underpinned by core professional competencies. This paper reports on a systematic review undertaken to establish the available evidence on education models and career pathways with a view to enhancing recruitment and retention of practice nurses in primary care in Australia.
Methods:
Search terms describing education models, career pathways and policy associated with primary care (practice) nursing were established. These search terms were used to search electronic databases. The search strategy identified 1394 citations of which 408 addressed one or more of the key search terms on policy, education and career pathways. Grey literature from the UK and New Zealand internet sites were sourced and examined. The UK and New Zealand Internet sites were selected because they have well established and advanced developments in education and career pathways for practice nurses.Two reviewers examined titles, abstracts and studies, based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Disagreement between the reviewers was resolved by consensus or by a third reviewer.
Results:
Significant advances have been made in New Zealand and the UK towards strengthening frameworks for primary care nursing education and career pathways. However, in Australia there is no policy at national level prepare nurses to work in primary care sector and no framework for education or career pathways for nurses working in that sector.
Conclusion:
There is a need for national training standards and a process of accreditation for practice nursing in Australia to support the development of a responsive and sustainable nursing workforce in primary care and to provide quality education and career pathways.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Rhian Parker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Helen Keleher</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karen Francis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Omar Abdulwadud</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/7">
        <title>Children&apos;s vomiting following posterior fossa surgery: A retrospective study 
</title>
        <description>Background:
Nausea and vomiting is a problem for children after neurosurgery and those requiring posterior fossa procedures appear to have a high incidence. This clinical observation has not been quantified nor have risk factors unique to this group of children been elucidated.
Methods:
A six year retrospective chart audit at two Canadian children&apos;s hospitals was conducted. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was extracted. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression was used to quantify risk and protective factors at 120 hours after surgery and early vs. late vomiting.
Results:
The incidence of vomiting over a ten day postoperative period was 76.7%. Documented vomiting ranged from single events to greater than 20 over the same period. In the final multivariable model: adolescents (age 12 to &lt;17) were less likely to vomit by 120 hours after surgery than other age groups; those who received desflurane, when compared to all other volatile anesthetics, were more likely to vomit, yet the use of ondansetron with desflurane decre kelihood. Children who had intraoperative ondansetron were more likely to vomit in the final multivariable model (perhaps because of its use, in the clinical judgment of the anesthesiologist, for children considered at risk). Children who started vomiting in the first 24 hours were more likely to be school age (groups 4 to &lt;7 and 7 to &lt;12) and receive desflurane. Nausea was not well documented and was therefore not analyzed.
Conclusion:
The incidence of vomiting in children after posterior fossa surgery is sufficient to consider all children requiring these procedures to be at high risk for POV. Nausea requires better assessment and documentation.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Susan Neufeld</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christine Newburn-Cook</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Donald Schopflocher</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Belinda Dundon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Herta Yu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jane Drummond</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-7</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
