<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>BMC Nursing - Most viewed articles</title>
		<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcnurs/mostviewed/</link>
		<description>Most viewed articles in last 30 days from BMC Nursing (ISSN 1472-6955) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
         <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/6"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/7"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/1"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/6/11"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/6"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/3/2"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/3/6"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/10"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/11"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/2"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/6">
            
            <title>A qualitative study of nursing student experiences of clinical practice</title>
			<description>Background:
Nursing student's experiences of their clinical practice provide greater insight to develop an effective clinical teaching strategy in nursing education. The main objective of this study was to investigate student nurses' experience about their clinical practice.
Methods:
Focus groups were used to obtain students' opinion and experiences about their clinical practice. 90 baccalaureate nursing students at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery) were selected randomly from two hundred students and were arranged in 9 groups of ten students. To analyze the data the method used to code and categories focus group data were adapted from approaches to qualitative data analysis.
Results:
Four themes emerged from the focus group data. From the students' point of view," initial clinical anxiety", "theory-practice gap"," clinical supervision", professional role", were considered as important factors in clinical experience.
Conclusion:
The result of this study showed that nursing students were not satisfied with the clinical component of their education. They experienced anxiety as a result of feeling incompetent and lack of professional nursing skills and knowledge to take care of various patients in the clinical setting.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/6</link>		
			<dc:creator>Farkhondeh Sharif and Sara Masoumi</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2005, 4:6</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 1101</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2005-11-09</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-4-6</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2005-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/7">
            
            <title>Job satisfaction trends during nurses' early career</title>
			<description>Background:
Job satisfaction is an important component of nurses' lives that can impact on patient safety, productivity and performance, quality of care, retention and turnover, commitment to the organisation and the profession. Little is known about job satisfaction in early career and how it varies for different groups of nurses. This paper investigates how the components of job satisfaction vary during early career in newly qualified UK nurses.
Methods:
Nurses were sampled using a combined census and multi-stage approach (n = 3962). Data were collected by questionnaire at 6 months, 18 months and 3 years after qualification between 1998 and 2001. Scores were calculated for seven job satisfaction components and a single item that measured satisfaction with pay. Scores were compared longitudinally and between nursing speciality (general, children's, mental health) using a mixed model approach.
Results:
No single pattern across time emerged. Trends varied by branch and job satisfaction component. Rank order of job satisfaction components, from high to low scores, was very similar for adult and child branch nurses and different for mental health. Nurses were least satisfied with pay and most satisfied with relationships at 6 and 18 months and with resources (adult and child) and relationships (mental health) at 3 years. Trends were typically upwards for adult branch nurses, varied for children's nurses and downwards for mental health nurses.
Conclusion:
The impact of time on job satisfaction in early career is highly dependent on specialism. Different contexts, settings and organisational settings lead to varying experiences. Future research should focus on understanding the relationships between job characteristics and the components of job satisfaction rather than job satisfaction as a unitary construct. Research that further investigates the benefits of a formal one year preceptorship or probationary period is needed.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/7</link>		
			<dc:creator>Trevor Murrells, Sarah Robinson and Peter Griffiths</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2008, 7:7</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 943</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-06-05</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-7-7</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-05</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/1">
            
            <title>Managing change in the nursing handover from traditional to bedside handover &#8211; a case study from Mauritius</title>
			<description>Background:
The shift handover forms an important part of the communication process that takes place twice within the nurses' working day in the gynaecological ward. This paper addresses the topic of implementing a new system of bedside handover, which puts patients central to the whole process of managing care and also addresses some of the shortcomings of the traditional handover system.
Methods:
A force field analysis in terms of the driving forces had shown that there was dissatisfaction with the traditional method of handover which had led to an increase in the number of critical incidents and complaints from patients, relatives and doctors. The restraining forces identified were a fear of accountability, lack of confidence and that this change would lead to more work. A 3 &#8211; step planned change model consisting of unfreezing, moving and refreezing was used to guide us through the change process. Resistance to change was managed by creating a climate of open communication where stakeholders were allowed to voice opinions, share concerns, insights, and ideas thereby actively participating in decision making.
Results:
An evaluation had shown that this process was successfully implemented to the satisfaction of patients, and staff in general.
Conclusion:
This successful change should encourage other nurses to become more proactive in identifying areas for change management in order to improve our health care system.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/1</link>		
			<dc:creator>Hemant K Kassean and Zaheda B Jagoo</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2005, 4:1</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 895</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2005-01-28</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-4-1</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2005-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/6/11">
            
            <title>Experienced stressors and coping strategies among Iranian nursing students</title>
			<description>Background:
College students are prone to stress due to the transitional nature of college life. High levels of stress are believed to affect students' health and academic functions. If the stress is not dealt with effectively, feelings of loneliness, nervousness, sleeplessness and worrying may result. Effective coping strategies facilitate the return to a balanced state, reducing the negative effects of stress.
Methods:
This descriptive cross-sectional study was performed to determine sources of stress and coping strategies in nursing students studying at the Iran Faculty of Nursing &amp; Midwifery. All undergraduate nursing students enrolled in years 1-4 during academic year 2004-2005 were included in this study, with a total of 366 questionnaires fully completed by the students. The Student Stress Survey and the Adolescent Coping Orientation for Problem Experiences Inventory (ACOPE) were used for data collection.
Results:
Most students reported "finding new friends" (76.2%), "working with people they did not know" (63.4%) as interpersonal sources of stress, "new responsibilities" (72.1%), "started college" (65.8%) as intrapersonal sources of stress more than others. The most frequent academic source of stress was "increased class workload" (66.9%) and the most frequent environmental sources of stress were being "placed in unfamiliar situations" (64.2%) and "waiting in long lines" (60.4%). Interpersonal and environmental sources of stress were reported more frequently than intrapersonal and academic sources. Mean interpersonal (P=0.04) and environmental (P=0.04) sources of stress were significantly greater in first year than in fourth year students. Among coping strategies in 12 areas, the family problem solving strategies, "trying to reason with parents and compromise" (73%) and "going along with family rules" (68%) were used "often or always" by most students.  To cope with engaging in demanding activity, students often or always used "trying to figure out how to deal with problems" (66.4%) and "trying to improve themselves" (64.5%). The self-reliance strategy, "trying to make their own decisions" (62%); the social support strategies, "apologizing to people"  (59.6%), "trying to help other people solve their problems" (56.3%), and "trying to keep up friendships or make new friends" (54.4%); the spiritual strategy, "praying" (65.8%); the seeking diversions strategy, "listening to music" (57.7%), the relaxing strategy "day dreaming" (52.5%), and the effort to "be close with someone cares about you"  (50.5%) were each used "often or always" by a majority of students.  Most students reported that the avoiding strategies "smoking" (93.7%) and  "drinking beer or wine" (92.9%), the ventilating strategies "saying mean things to people" and "swearing" (85.8%), the professional support strategies "getting professional counseling" (74.6%) and "talking to a teacher or counselor" (67.2%) and the humorous strategy "joking and keeping a sense of humor" (51.9%) were used "seldom or never".
Conclusion:
First year nursing students are exposed to a variety of stressors. Establishing a student support system during the first year and improving it throughout nursing school is necessary to equip nursing students with effective coping skills. Efforts should include counseling helpers and their teachers, strategies that can be called upon in these students' future nursing careers.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/6/11</link>		
			<dc:creator>Naiemeh Seyedfatemi, Maryam Tafreshi and Hamid Hagani</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2007, 6:11</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 832</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2007-11-13</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-6-11</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-13</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/6">
            
            <title>Nursing students motivation toward their studies &#8211; a survey study</title>
			<description>Background:
This study focuses on Swedish nursing students' motivation toward their studies during their three year academic studies. Earlier studies show the importance of motivation for study commitment and result. The aim was to analyze nursing students' estimation of their degree of motivation during different semester during their education and to identify reasons for the degree of motivation.
Methods:
A questionnaire asking for scoring motivation and what influenced the degree of motivation was distributed to students enrolled in a nursing programme. 315 students who studied at different semesters participated. Analyzes were made by statistical calculation and content analysis.
Results:
The mean motivation score over all semesters was 6.3 (ranked between 0&#8211;10) and differed significantly during the semesters with a tendency to lower score during the 5th semester. Students (73/315) with motivation score &lt;4 reported explanations such as negative opinion about the organisation of the programme, attitude towards the studies, life situation and degree of difficulty/demand on studies. Students (234/315) with motivation score >6 reported positive opinions to becoming a nurse (125/234), organization of the programme and attitude to the studies. The mean score value for the motivation ranking differed significantly between male (5.8) and female (6.8) students.
Conclusion:
Conclusions to be drawn are that nursing students mainly grade their motivation positive distributed different throughout their entire education. The main motivation factor was becoming a nurse. This study result highlights the need of understanding the students' situation and their need of tutorial support.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/6</link>		
			<dc:creator>Kerstin EL Nilsson and Margareta I  Warr&#233;n Stomberg</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2008, 7:6</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 815</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-04-25</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-7-6</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-25</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/3/2">
            
            <title>The factors facilitating and inhibiting effective clinical decision-making in nursing: a qualitative study</title>
			<description>Background:
Nurses' practice takes place in a context of ongoing advances in research and technology. The dynamic and uncertain nature of health care environment requires nurses to be competent decision-makers in order to respond to clients' needs. Recently, the public and the government have criticized Iranian nurses because of poor quality of patient care. However nurses' views and experiences on factors that affect their clinical function and clinical decision-making have rarely been studied.
Methods:
Grounded theory methodology was used to analyze the participants' lived experiences and their viewpoints regarding the factors affecting their clinical function and clinical decision-making. Semi-structured interviews and participant observation methods were used to gather the data. Thirty-eight participants were interviewed and twelve sessions of observation were carried out. Constant comparative analysis method was used to analyze the data.
Results:
Five main themes emerged from the data. From the participants' points of view, "feeling competent", "being self-confident", "organizational structure", "nursing education", and "being supported" were considered as important factors in effective clinical decision-making.
Conclusion:
As participants in this research implied, being competent and self-confident are the most important personal factors influencing nurses clinical decision-making. Also external factors such as organizational structure, access to supportive resources and nursing education have strengthening or inhibiting effects on the nurses' decisions. Individual nurses, professional associations, schools of nursing, nurse educators, organizations that employ nurses and government all have responsibility for developing and finding strategies that facilitate nurses' effective clinical decision-making. They are responsible for identifying barriers and enhancing factors within the organizational structure that facilitate nurses' clinical decision-making.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/3/2</link>		
			<dc:creator>Mohsen Adib Hagbaghery, Mahvash Salsali and Fazlolah Ahmadi</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2004, 3:2</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 613</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2004-04-06</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-3-2</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2004-04-06</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/3/6">
            
            <title>Factors involved in nurses' responses to burnout: a grounded theory study</title>
			<description>Background:
Intense and long-standing problems in burn centers in Tehran have led nurses to burnout. This phenomenon has provoked serious responses and has put the nurses, patients and the organization under pressure. The challenge for managers and nurse executives is to understand the factors which would reduce or increase the nurses' responses to burnout and develop delivery systems that promote positive adaptation and facilitate quality care. This study, as a part of more extensive research, aims to explore and describe the nurses' perceptions of the factors affecting their responses to burnout.
Methods:
Grounded theory was used as the method. Thirty- eight participants were recruited. Data were generated by unstructured interviews and 21 sessions of participant observations. Constant comparison was used for data analysis.
Results:
Nurses' and patients' personal characteristics and social support influenced nurses' responses to burnout. Personal characteristics of the nurses and patients, especially when interacting, had a more powerful effect. They altered emotional, attitudinal, behavioral and organizational responses to burnout and determined the kind of caring behavior. Social support had a palliative effect and altered emotional responses and some aspects of attitudinal responses.
Conclusions:
The powerful effect of positive personal characteristics and its sensitivity to long standing and intense organizational pressures suggests approaches to executing stress reduction programs and refreshing the nurses' morale by giving more importance to ethical aspects of caring. Moreover, regarding palliative effect of social support and its importance for the nurses' wellbeing, nurse executives are responsible for promoting a work environment that supports nurses and motivates them.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/3/6</link>		
			<dc:creator>Forough Rafii, Fatemeh Oskouie and Mansoure Nikravesh</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2004, 3:6</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 609</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2004-11-13</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-3-6</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2004-11-13</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/10">
            
            <title>A randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a single session of nurse administered massage for short term relief of chronic non-malignant pain.
</title>
			<description>Background:
Massage is increasingly used to manage chronic pain but its benefit has not been clearly established. The aim of the study is to determine the effectiveness of a single session of nurse admninistered massage for relief of chronic non-malignant pain and anxiety.
Methods:
A randomised controlled trial design was used, in which the patients were assigned to a massage or control group. The massage group received a 15 minute manual massage and the control group a 15 minute visit to talk about their pain. Adult patients attending a pain relief unit with a diagnosis of chronic pain whose pain was described as moderate or severe were eligible for the study.   An observer blind to the patientsa treatment group carried out assessments immediately before (baseline), after treatment and 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours later. Pain was assessed using 100mm visual analogue scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire.  Pain Relief was assessed using a five point verbal rating scale. Anxiety was assessed with the Spielberger short form State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.
Results:
101 patients were randomised and evaluated, 50 in the massage and 51 in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups at baseline interview. Patients in the massage but not the control group had significantly less pain compared to baseline immediately after and one hour post treatment. 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean pain reduction at one hour post treatment between the massage and control groups is 5.47mm to 24.70mm. Patients in the massage but not the control group had statistically significantly less anxiety compared to baseline immediately after and at 1 and 2 hours post treatment. 
Conclusion:
Massage is effective in the short term for chronic pain of moderate to severe intensity. </description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/10</link>		
			<dc:creator>Kate Seers, Nicola Crichton, June Martin, Katrina Coulson and Dawn Carroll</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2008, 7:10</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 509</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-07-04</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-7-10</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-04</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/11">
            
            <title>Dignity in the Care of Older People - A Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature</title>
			<description>Background:
Dignity has become a central plank of UK health policy in relation to older and vulnerable people. The empirical and theoretical literature relating to dignity is now very extensive and as likely to confound and confuse as to clarify the meaning of dignity for nurses in practice. The aim of this paper is to critically examine the literature with a view to responding to the followings questions: What does dignity mean? What promotes and diminishes dignity? And how might dignity be operationalised in the care of older people? 
This paper critically reviews the theoretical and empirical literature relating to dignity and clarifies the meaning and implications of dignity in relation to the care of older people. If nurses are to provide dignified care clarification is an essential first step. 
Results:
We identify key dignity promoting factors evident in the literature - staff attitudes and behaviour; environment; culture of care; and resources. Although there is scope to learn more about cultural aspects of dignity we know a good deal about dignity in care in general terms. 
Methods:
This is a literature review examining papers reporting theoretical perspectives and empirical studies relating to dignity were critically analysed. The following databases were searched: Assia, BHI, CINAHL, Social Services Abstracts, IBSS, Web of Knowledge Social Sciences Citation Index and Arts &amp; Humanities Citation Index and location of books and chapters in philosophy literature. An analytical approach was adopted focusing on extracting responses to the review objectives.
Conclusion:
We argue that what is required is to provide sufficient support and education to help nurses understand dignity and adequate resources to operationalise dignity in their everyday practice.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/11</link>		
			<dc:creator>Ann Gallagher, Sarah Li, Paul Wainwright, Ian Rees Jones and Diana Lee</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2008, 7:11</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 484</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-07-11</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-7-11</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-11</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/2">
            
            <title>Pharmacology education for nurse prescribing students &#8211; a lesson in reusable learning objects</title>
			<description>Background:
The shift away from a biological science to a social science model of nursing care has resulted in a reduction in pharmacology knowledge and understanding in pre-registration nursing students. This has a significant impact on nurse prescribing training where pharmacology is a critical component of the course from a patient safety perspective.
Methods:
Reusable learning objects (RLOs) are electronic resources based on a single learning objective which use high quality graphics and audio to help engagement with the material and to facilitate learning. This study used questionnaire data from three successive cohorts of nurse prescribing students (n = 84) to evaluate the use of RLOs focussed around pharmacology concepts to promote the understanding of these concepts in students. A small number of students (n = 10) were followed up by telephone interview one year after qualification to gain further insight into students' perceptions of the value of RLOs as an educational tool.
Results:
Students' perceptions of their own understanding of pharmacology concepts increased substantially following the introduction of RLOs to supplement the pharmacology component of the course. Student evaluation of the RLOs themselves was extremely positive with a number of students continuing to access these tools post-qualification.
Conclusion:
The use of RLOs to support the pharmacology component of nurse prescribing courses successfully resulted in a perceived increase in pharmacology understanding, with some students directly implicating these educational tools in developing confidence in their own prescribing abilities.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/2</link>		
			<dc:creator>Joanne S Lymn, Fiona Bath-Hextall and Heather J Wharrad</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2008, 7:2</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 468</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-01-23</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-7-2</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-23</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
	<cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
