<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>BMC Nursing - Most viewed articles</title>
		<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcnurs/mostviewed/</link>
		<description>Most viewed articles in last 30 days from BMC Nursing (ISSN 1472-6955) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
         <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/7"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/1"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/6"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/6"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/11"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/6/11"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/3"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/2"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/5/3"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/10"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/7">
            
            <title>Job satisfaction trends during nurses' early career</title>
			<description>Background:
Job satisfaction is an important component of nurses' lives that can impact on patient safety, productivity and performance, quality of care, retention and turnover, commitment to the organisation and the profession. Little is known about job satisfaction in early career and how it varies for different groups of nurses. This paper investigates how the components of job satisfaction vary during early career in newly qualified UK nurses.
Methods:
Nurses were sampled using a combined census and multi-stage approach (n = 3962). Data were collected by questionnaire at 6 months, 18 months and 3 years after qualification between 1998 and 2001. Scores were calculated for seven job satisfaction components and a single item that measured satisfaction with pay. Scores were compared longitudinally and between nursing speciality (general, children's, mental health) using a mixed model approach.
Results:
No single pattern across time emerged. Trends varied by branch and job satisfaction component. Rank order of job satisfaction components, from high to low scores, was very similar for adult and child branch nurses and different for mental health. Nurses were least satisfied with pay and most satisfied with relationships at 6 and 18 months and with resources (adult and child) and relationships (mental health) at 3 years. Trends were typically upwards for adult branch nurses, varied for children's nurses and downwards for mental health nurses.
Conclusion:
The impact of time on job satisfaction in early career is highly dependent on specialism. Different contexts, settings and organisational settings lead to varying experiences. Future research should focus on understanding the relationships between job characteristics and the components of job satisfaction rather than job satisfaction as a unitary construct. Research that further investigates the benefits of a formal one year preceptorship or probationary period is needed.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/7</link>		
			<dc:creator>Trevor Murrells, Sarah Robinson and Peter Griffiths</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2008, 7:7</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 972</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-06-05</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-7-7</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-05</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/1">
            
            <title>Managing change in the nursing handover from traditional to bedside handover &#8211; a case study from Mauritius</title>
			<description>Background:
The shift handover forms an important part of the communication process that takes place twice within the nurses' working day in the gynaecological ward. This paper addresses the topic of implementing a new system of bedside handover, which puts patients central to the whole process of managing care and also addresses some of the shortcomings of the traditional handover system.
Methods:
A force field analysis in terms of the driving forces had shown that there was dissatisfaction with the traditional method of handover which had led to an increase in the number of critical incidents and complaints from patients, relatives and doctors. The restraining forces identified were a fear of accountability, lack of confidence and that this change would lead to more work. A 3 &#8211; step planned change model consisting of unfreezing, moving and refreezing was used to guide us through the change process. Resistance to change was managed by creating a climate of open communication where stakeholders were allowed to voice opinions, share concerns, insights, and ideas thereby actively participating in decision making.
Results:
An evaluation had shown that this process was successfully implemented to the satisfaction of patients, and staff in general.
Conclusion:
This successful change should encourage other nurses to become more proactive in identifying areas for change management in order to improve our health care system.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/1</link>		
			<dc:creator>Hemant K Kassean and Zaheda B Jagoo</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2005, 4:1</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 900</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2005-01-28</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-4-1</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2005-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/6">
            
            <title>Nursing students motivation toward their studies &#8211; a survey study</title>
			<description>Background:
This study focuses on Swedish nursing students' motivation toward their studies during their three year academic studies. Earlier studies show the importance of motivation for study commitment and result. The aim was to analyze nursing students' estimation of their degree of motivation during different semester during their education and to identify reasons for the degree of motivation.
Methods:
A questionnaire asking for scoring motivation and what influenced the degree of motivation was distributed to students enrolled in a nursing programme. 315 students who studied at different semesters participated. Analyzes were made by statistical calculation and content analysis.
Results:
The mean motivation score over all semesters was 6.3 (ranked between 0&#8211;10) and differed significantly during the semesters with a tendency to lower score during the 5th semester. Students (73/315) with motivation score &lt;4 reported explanations such as negative opinion about the organisation of the programme, attitude towards the studies, life situation and degree of difficulty/demand on studies. Students (234/315) with motivation score >6 reported positive opinions to becoming a nurse (125/234), organization of the programme and attitude to the studies. The mean score value for the motivation ranking differed significantly between male (5.8) and female (6.8) students.
Conclusion:
Conclusions to be drawn are that nursing students mainly grade their motivation positive distributed different throughout their entire education. The main motivation factor was becoming a nurse. This study result highlights the need of understanding the students' situation and their need of tutorial support.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/6</link>		
			<dc:creator>Kerstin EL Nilsson and Margareta I  Warr&#233;n Stomberg</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2008, 7:6</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 860</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-04-25</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-7-6</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-25</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/6">
            
            <title>A qualitative study of nursing student experiences of clinical practice</title>
			<description>Background:
Nursing student's experiences of their clinical practice provide greater insight to develop an effective clinical teaching strategy in nursing education. The main objective of this study was to investigate student nurses' experience about their clinical practice.
Methods:
Focus groups were used to obtain students' opinion and experiences about their clinical practice. 90 baccalaureate nursing students at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery) were selected randomly from two hundred students and were arranged in 9 groups of ten students. To analyze the data the method used to code and categories focus group data were adapted from approaches to qualitative data analysis.
Results:
Four themes emerged from the focus group data. From the students' point of view," initial clinical anxiety", "theory-practice gap"," clinical supervision", professional role", were considered as important factors in clinical experience.
Conclusion:
The result of this study showed that nursing students were not satisfied with the clinical component of their education. They experienced anxiety as a result of feeling incompetent and lack of professional nursing skills and knowledge to take care of various patients in the clinical setting.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/6</link>		
			<dc:creator>Farkhondeh Sharif and Sara Masoumi</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2005, 4:6</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 811</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2005-11-09</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-4-6</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2005-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/11">
            
            <title>Dignity in the care of older people &#8211; a review of the theoretical and empirical literature</title>
			<description>Background:
Dignity has become a central concern in UK health policy in relation to older and vulnerable people. The empirical and theoretical literature relating to dignity is extensive and as likely to confound and confuse as to clarify the meaning of dignity for nurses in practice. The aim of this paper is critically to examine the literature and to address the following questions: What does dignity mean? What promotes and diminishes dignity? And how might dignity be operationalised in the care of older people?This paper critically reviews the theoretical and empirical literature relating to dignity and clarifies the meaning and implications of dignity in relation to the care of older people. If nurses are to provide dignified care clarification is an essential first step.
Methods:
This is a review article, critically examining papers reporting theoretical perspectives and empirical studies relating to dignity. The following databases were searched: Assia, BHI, CINAHL, Social Services Abstracts, IBSS, Web of Knowledge Social Sciences Citation Index and Arts &amp; Humanities Citation Index and location of books a chapters in philosophy literature. An analytical approach was adopted to the publications reviewed, focusing on the objectives of the review.Results and discussionWe review a range of theoretical and empirical accounts of dignity and identify key dignity promoting factors evident in the literature, including staff attitudes and behaviour; environment; culture of care; and the performance of specific care activities. Although there is scope to learn more about cultural aspects of dignity we know a good deal about dignity in care in general terms.
Conclusion:
We argue that what is required is to provide sufficient support and education to help nurses understand dignity and adequate resources to operationalise dignity in their everyday practice. Using the themes identified from our review we offer proposals for the direction of future research.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/11</link>		
			<dc:creator>Ann Gallagher, Sarah Li, Paul Wainwright, Ian Rees Jones and Diana Lee</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2008, 7:11</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 782</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-07-11</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-7-11</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-11</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/6/11">
            
            <title>Experienced stressors and coping strategies among Iranian nursing students</title>
			<description>Background:
College students are prone to stress due to the transitional nature of college life. High levels of stress are believed to affect students' health and academic functions. If the stress is not dealt with effectively, feelings of loneliness, nervousness, sleeplessness and worrying may result. Effective coping strategies facilitate the return to a balanced state, reducing the negative effects of stress.
Methods:
This descriptive cross-sectional study was performed to determine sources of stress and coping strategies in nursing students studying at the Iran Faculty of Nursing &amp; Midwifery. All undergraduate nursing students enrolled in years 1-4 during academic year 2004-2005 were included in this study, with a total of 366 questionnaires fully completed by the students. The Student Stress Survey and the Adolescent Coping Orientation for Problem Experiences Inventory (ACOPE) were used for data collection.
Results:
Most students reported "finding new friends" (76.2%), "working with people they did not know" (63.4%) as interpersonal sources of stress, "new responsibilities" (72.1%), "started college" (65.8%) as intrapersonal sources of stress more than others. The most frequent academic source of stress was "increased class workload" (66.9%) and the most frequent environmental sources of stress were being "placed in unfamiliar situations" (64.2%) and "waiting in long lines" (60.4%). Interpersonal and environmental sources of stress were reported more frequently than intrapersonal and academic sources. Mean interpersonal (P=0.04) and environmental (P=0.04) sources of stress were significantly greater in first year than in fourth year students. Among coping strategies in 12 areas, the family problem solving strategies, "trying to reason with parents and compromise" (73%) and "going along with family rules" (68%) were used "often or always" by most students.  To cope with engaging in demanding activity, students often or always used "trying to figure out how to deal with problems" (66.4%) and "trying to improve themselves" (64.5%). The self-reliance strategy, "trying to make their own decisions" (62%); the social support strategies, "apologizing to people"  (59.6%), "trying to help other people solve their problems" (56.3%), and "trying to keep up friendships or make new friends" (54.4%); the spiritual strategy, "praying" (65.8%); the seeking diversions strategy, "listening to music" (57.7%), the relaxing strategy "day dreaming" (52.5%), and the effort to "be close with someone cares about you"  (50.5%) were each used "often or always" by a majority of students.  Most students reported that the avoiding strategies "smoking" (93.7%) and  "drinking beer or wine" (92.9%), the ventilating strategies "saying mean things to people" and "swearing" (85.8%), the professional support strategies "getting professional counseling" (74.6%) and "talking to a teacher or counselor" (67.2%) and the humorous strategy "joking and keeping a sense of humor" (51.9%) were used "seldom or never".
Conclusion:
First year nursing students are exposed to a variety of stressors. Establishing a student support system during the first year and improving it throughout nursing school is necessary to equip nursing students with effective coping skills. Efforts should include counseling helpers and their teachers, strategies that can be called upon in these students' future nursing careers.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/6/11</link>		
			<dc:creator>Naiemeh Seyedfatemi, Maryam Tafreshi and Hamid Hagani</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2007, 6:11</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 512</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2007-11-13</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-6-11</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-13</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/3">
            
            <title>Identification of ICF categories relevant for nursing in the situation of acute and early post-acute rehabilitation</title>
			<description>Background:
The recovery of patients after an acute episode of illness or injury depends both on adequate medical treatment and on the early identification of needs for rehabilitation care. The process of early beginning rehabilitation requires efficient communication both between health professionals and the patient in order to effectively address all rehabilitation goals. The currently used nursing taxonomies, however, are not intended for interdisciplinary use and thus may not contribute to efficient rehabilitation management and an optimal patient outcome. The ICF might be the missing link in this communication process. The objective of this study was to identify the categories of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) categories relevant for nursing care in the situation of acute and early post-acute rehabilitation.
Methods:
First, in a consensus process, "Leistungserfassung in der Pflege" (LEP) nursing interventions relevant for the situation of acute and early post-acute rehabilitation were selected. Second, in an integrated two-step linking process, two nursing experts derived goals of LEP nursing interventions from their practical knowledge and selected corresponding ICF categories most relevant for patients in acute and post-acute rehabilitation (ICF Core Sets).
Results:
Eighty-seven percent of ICF Core Set categories could be linked to goals of at least one nursing intervention variable of LEP. The ICF categories most frequently linked with LEP nursing interventions were respiration functions, experience of self and time functions and focusing attention. Thirteen percent of ICF Core Set categories could not be linked with LEP nursing interventions. The LEP nursing interventions which were linked with the highest number of different ICF-categories of all were "therapeutic intervention", "patient-nurse communication/information giving" and "mobilising".
Conclusion:
The ICF Core Sets for the acute hospital and early post-acute rehabilitation facilities are highly relevant for rehabilitation nursing. Linking nursing interventions with ICF Core Set categories is a feasible way to analyse nursing. Using the ICF Core Sets to describe goals of nursing interventions both facilitates inter-professional communication and respects patient's needs. The ICF may thus be a useful framework to set nursing intervention goals.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/3</link>		
			<dc:creator>Martin Mueller, Christine Boldt, Eva Grill, Ralf Strobl and Gerold Stucki</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2008, 7:3</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 493</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-02-18</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-7-3</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-18</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/2">
            
            <title>The effects of long-term total parenteral nutrition on gut mucosal immunity in children with short bowel syndrome: a systematic review</title>
			<description>Background:
Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is defined as the malabsorptive state that often follows massive resection of the small intestine. Most cases originate in the newborn period and result from congenital anomalies. It is associated with a high morbidity, is potentially lethal and often requires months, sometimes years, in the hospital and home on total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Long-term survival without parenteral nutrition depends upon establishing enteral nutrition and the process of intestinal adaptation through which the remaining small bowel gradually increases its absorptive capacity. The purpose of this article is to perform a descriptive systematic review of the published articles on the effects of TPN on the intestinal immune system investigating whether long-term TPN induces bacterial translocation, decreases secretory immunoglobulin A (S-IgA), impairs intestinal immunity, and changes mucosal architecture in children with SBS.
Methods:
The databases of OVID, such as MEDLINE and CINAHL, Cochran Library, and Evidence-Based Medicine were searched for articles published from 1990 to 2001. Search terms were total parenteral nutrition, children, bacterial translocation, small bowel syndrome, short gut syndrome, intestinal immunity, gut permeability, sepsis, hyperglycemia, immunonutrition, glutamine, enteral tube feeding, and systematic reviews. The goal was to include all clinical studies conducted in children directly addressing the effects of TPN on gut immunity.
Results:
A total of 13 studies were identified. These 13 studies included a total of 414 infants and children between the ages approximately 4 months to 17 years old, and 16 healthy adults as controls; and they varied in design and were conducted in several disciplines. The results were integrated into common themes. Five themes were identified: 1) sepsis, 2) impaired immune functions: In vitro studies, 3) mortality, 4) villous atrophy, 5) duration of dependency on TPN after bowel resection.
Conclusion:
Based on this exhaustive literature review, there is no direct evidence suggesting that TPN promotes bacterial overgrowth, impairs neutrophil functions, inhibits blood's bactericidal effect, causes villous atrophy, or causes to death in human model.The hypothesis relating negative effects of TPN on gut immunity remains attractive, but unproven. Enteral nutrition is cheaper, but no safer than TPN. Based on the current evidence, TPN seems to be safe and a life saving solution.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/2</link>		
			<dc:creator>Beyhan Duran</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2005, 4:2</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 441</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2005-02-01</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-4-2</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2005-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/5/3">
            
            <title>Patient advocacy: barriers and facilitators</title>
			<description>Background:
During the two recent decades, advocacy has been a topic of much debate in the nursing profession. Although advocacy has embraced a crucial role for nurses, its extent is often limited in practice. While a variety of studies have been generated all over the world, barriers and facilitators in the patient advocacy have not been completely identified. This article presents the findings of a study exploring the barriers and facilitators influencing the role of advocacy among Iranian nurses.MethodThis study was conducted by grounded theory method. Participants were 24 Iranian registered nurses working in a large university hospital in Tehran, Iran. Semi-structured interviews were used for data collection. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and simultaneously Constant comparative analysis was used according to the Strauss and Corbin method.
Results:
Through data analysis, several main themes emerged to describe the factors that hindered or facilitated patient advocacy. Nurses in this study identified powerlessness, lack of support, law, code of ethics and motivation, limited communication, physicians leading, risk of advocacy, royalty to peers, and insufficient time to interact with patients and families as barriers to advocacy. As for factors that facilitated nurses to act as a patient advocate, it was found that the nature of nurse-patient relationship, recognizing patients' needs, nurses' responsibility, physician as a colleague, and nurses' knowledge and skills could be influential in adopting the advocacy role.
Conclusion:
Participants believed that in this context taking an advocacy role is difficult for nurses due to the barriers mentioned. Therefore, they make decisions and act as a patient's advocate in any situation concerning patient needs and status of barriers and facilitators. In most cases, they can not act at an optimal level; instead they accept only what they can do, which we called 'limited advocacy' in this study. It is concluded that advocacy is contextually complex, and is a controversial and risky component of the nursing practice. Further research is needed to determine the possibility of a correlation between identified barriers/ facilitators and the use of advocacy.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/5/3</link>		
			<dc:creator>Reza Negarandeh, Fatemeh Oskouie, Fazlollah Ahmadi, Mansoure Nikravesh and Ingalill Rahm Hallberg</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2006, 5:3</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 432</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2006-03-01</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-5-3</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2006-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/10">
            
            <title>A randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a single session of nurse administered massage for short term relief of chronic non-malignant pain</title>
			<description>Background:
Massage is increasingly used to manage chronic pain but its benefit has not been clearly established. The aim of the study is to determine the effectiveness of a single session of nurse-administered massage for the short term relief of chronic non-malignant pain and anxiety.
Methods:
A randomised controlled trial design was used, in which the patients were assigned to a massage or control group. The massage group received a 15 minute manual massage and the control group a 15 minute visit to talk about their pain. Adult patients attending a pain relief unit with a diagnosis of chronic pain whose pain was described as moderate or severe were eligible for the study. An observer blind to the patients' treatment group carried out assessments immediately before (baseline), after treatment and 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours later. Pain was assessed using 100 mm visual analogue scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain Relief was assessed using a five point verbal rating scale. Anxiety was assessed with the Spielberger short form State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.
Results:
101 patients were randomised and evaluated, 50 in the massage and 51 in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups at baseline interview. Patients in the massage but not the control group had significantly less pain compared to baseline immediately after and one hour post treatment. 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean pain reduction at one hour post treatment between the massage and control groups is 5.47 mm to 24.70 mm. Patients in the massage but not the control group had a statistically significant reduction in anxiety compared to baseline immediately after and at 1 hour post treatment.
Conclusion:
Massage is effective in the short term for chronic pain of moderate to severe intensity.Trial Registration[ISRCTN98406653]</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/10</link>		
			<dc:creator>Kate Seers, Nicola Crichton, June Martin, Katrina Coulson and Dawn Carroll</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Nursing 2008, 7:10</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 420</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-07-04</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-7-10</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-04</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
	<cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
