<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?journal=bmcnurs&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Nursing - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcnurs/</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by BMC Nursing</description>
        <dc:date>2012-04-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/11/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/11/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/11/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/11/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/11/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/11/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/10/24" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/10/23" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/10/22" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/10/21" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/11/6">
        <title>Tobacco cessation Clinical Practice Guideline use by rural and urban hospital nurses: A pre-implementation needs assessment</title>
        <description>Background:
This study was a pre-program evaluation of hospital-based nurses&apos; tobacco intervention beliefs, confidence, training, practice, and perceived intervention barriers and facilitators. It was designed to identify relevant information prior to implementing tobacco cessation guidelines across a large northern rural region, home to 1 urban and 12 rural hospitals.
Methods:
This cross-sectional survey was distributed by nurse managers to nurses in the 13 hospitals and returned by nurses (N = 269) via mail to the researchers.
Results:
Nurses were somewhat confident providing cessation interventions, agreed they should educate patients about tobacco, and 94% perceived tobacco counselling as part of their role. Although only 11% had received cessation training, the majority reported intervening, even if seldom--91% asked about tobacco-use, 96% advised quitting, 89% assessed readiness to quit, 88% assisted with quitting, and 61% arranged post-discharge follow-up. Few performed any of these steps frequently, and among those who intervened, the majority spent &lt;10 minutes. The most frequently performed activities tended to take the least amount of time, while the more complex activities (e.g., teaching coping skills and pharmacotherapy education) were seldom performed. Patient-related factors (quitting benefits and motivation) encouraged nurses to intervene and work-related factors discouraged them (time and workloads). There were significant rural-urban differences--more rural nurses perceived intervening as part of their role, reported having more systems in place to support cessation, reported higher confidence for intervening, and more frequently assisted patients with quitting and arranged follow-up.
Conclusions:
The findings showed nurses&apos; willingness to engage in tobacco interventions. What the majority were doing maps onto the recommended minimum of 1-3 minutes but intervention frequency and follow-up were suboptimal. The rural-urban differences suggest a need for more research to explore the strengths of rural practice which could potentially inform approaches to smoking cessation in urban hospitals.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/11/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Patricia Smith</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Scott Sellick</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michelle Spadoni</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2012, null:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-11-6</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1472-6955-11-6-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/11/5">
        <title>The Naive nurse: revisiting vulnerability for nursing
</title>
        <description>Background:
Nurses in the Western world have given considerable attention to the concept of vulnerabilityin recent decades. However, nurses have tended to view vulnerability from an individualisticperspective, and have rarely taken into account structural or collective dimensions of theconcept. As the need grows for health workers to engage in the global health agenda, nursesmust broaden earlier works on vulnerability, noting that conventional conceptualizations andpractical applications on the notion of vulnerability warrant extension to include morecollective conceptualizations thereby making a more complete understanding of vulnerabilityin nursing discourse.DiscussionThe purpose of this paper is to examine nursing contributions to the concept of vulnerabilityand consider how a broader perspective that includes socio-political dimensions may assistnurses to reach beyond the immediate milieu of the patient into the dominant social, political,and economic structures that produce and sustain vulnerability.SummaryBy broadening nurse&apos;s conceptualization of vulnerability, nurses can obtain theconsciousness needed to move beyond a peripheral role of nursing that has been dominantlysituated within institutional settings to contribute in the larger arena of social, economic,political and global affairs.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/11/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Laura Tomm-Bonde</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2012, null:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-11-5</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Debating the concept of vulnerability</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>Nurses need to broaden their conceptualization of vulnerability to take account of the underlying socioeconomic and political causes, thereby extending the role of nursing into the wider arena.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1472-6955-11-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/11/4">
        <title>Is there scope for community health nurses to address lifestyle risk factors? The Community Nursing SNAP Trial</title>
        <description>Background:
This paper examines the opportunity and need for lifestyle interventions for patients attending generalist community nursing services in Australia. This will help determine the scope for risk factor management within community health care by generalist community nurses (GCNs).
Methods:
This was a quasi-experimental study conducted in four generalist community nursing services in NSW, Australia. Prior to service contacts, clients were offered a computer-assisted telephone interview to collect baseline data on socio-demographics, health conditions, smoking status, physical activity levels, alcohol consumption, height and weight, fruit and vegetable intake and &apos;readiness-to-change&apos; for lifestyle risk factors.
Results:
804 clients participated (a response rate of 34.1%). Participants had higher rates of obesity (40.5% vs 32.1%) and higher prevalence of multiple risk factors (40.4% vs 29.5%) than in the general population. Few with a SNAPW (Smoking-Nutrition-Alcohol-Physical-Activity-Weight) risk factor had received advice or referral in the previous 3 months. The proportion of clients identified as at risk and who were open to change (i.e. contemplative, in preparation or in action phase) were 65.0% for obese/overweight; 73.8% for smokers; 48.2% for individuals with high alcohol intake; 83.5% for the physically inactive and 59.0% for those with poor nutrition.
Conclusions:
There was high prevalence of lifestyle risk factors. Although most were ready to change, few clients recalled having received any recent lifestyle advice. This suggests that there is considerable scope for intervention by GCNs. The results of this trial will shed light on how best to implement the lifestyle risk factor management in routine practice.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/11/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Bibiana Chan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rachel Laws</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anna Williams</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gawaine Powell-Davies</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mahnaz Fanaian</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Harris</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2012, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-11-4</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1472-6955-11-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/11/3">
        <title>Capacity building of nurses providing neonatal care in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: methods for the POINTS of care project to enhance nursing education and reduce adverse neonatal outcomes</title>
        <description>Background:
Increased survival of preterm infants in developing countries has often been accompanied by increased morbidity. A previous study found rates of severe retinopathy of prematurity varied widely between different neonatal units in Rio de Janeiro. Nurses have a key role in the care of high-risk infants but often do not have access to ongoing education programmes. We set out to design a quality improvement project that would provide nurses with the training and tools to decrease neonatal mortality and morbidity. The purpose of this report is to describe the methods and make the teaching package (POINTS of care--six modules addressing Pain control; optimal Oxygenation; Infection control; Nutrition interventions; Temperature control; Supportive care) available to others.Methods/DesignSix neonatal units, caring for 40% of preterm infants in Rio de Janeiro were invited to participate. In Phase 1 of the study multidisciplinary workshops were held in each neonatal unit to identify the neonatal morbidities of interest and to plan for data collection. In Phase 2 the teaching package was developed and tested. Phase 3 consisted of 12 months data collection utilizing a simple tick-sheet for recording. In Phase 4 (the Intervention) all nurses were asked to complete all six modules of the POINTS of care package, which was supplemented by practical demonstrations. Phase 5 consisted of a further 12 months data collection. In Phase 1 it was agreed to include inborn infants with birthweight &#8804; 1500 g or gestational age of &#8804; 34 weeks. The primary outcome was death before discharge and secondary outcomes included retinopathy of prematurity and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Assuming 400-450 infants in both pre- and post-intervention periods the study had 80% power at p = &lt; 0.05 to detect an increase in survival from 68% to 80%; a reduction in need for supplementary oxygen at 36 weeks post menstrual age from 11% to 5.5% and a reduction in retinopathy of prematurity requiring treatment from 7% to 2.5%.DiscussionThe results of the POINTS of Care intervention will be presented in a separate publication.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials: ISRCTN83110114</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/11/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Brian Darlow</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrea Zin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gina Beecroft</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria Moreira</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Clare Gilbert</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2012, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-11-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1472-6955-11-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/11/2">
        <title>Postpartum nurses&apos; perceptions of barriers to screening for intimate partner violence: a cross-sectional survey
</title>
        <description>Background:
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a human rights violation that is pervasive worldwide, and is particularly critical for women during the reproductive period. IPV includes physical, sexual and emotional abuse. Nurses on in-patient postpartum units are well-positioned to screen women for IPV, yet low screening rates suggest that barriers to screening exist. The purpose of this study was to (a) identify the frequency of screening for IPV, (b) the most important barriers to screening, (c) the relationship between the barriers to screening and the frequency of screening for types of abuse, and (d) to identify other factors that contribute to the frequency of screening for IPV.
Methods:
In 2008, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of 96 nurses from postpartum inpatient units in three Canadian urban hospitals. The survey included the Barriers to Abuse Assessment Tool (BAAT), adapted for postpartum nurses (PPN). Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models were used to predict barriers to screening for each type of IPV.
Results:
The frequency of screening varied by the type of abuse with highest screening rates found for physical and emotional abuse. According to the BAAT-PPN, lack of knowledge was the most important barrier to screening. The BAAT-PPN total score was negatively correlated with screening for physical, sexual, and emotional abuse. Using OLS regression models and after controlling for demographic characteristics, the BAAT-PPN explained 14%, 12%, and 11% of the variance in screening for physical, sexual and emotional abuse, respectively. Fluency in the language of the patient was negatively correlated with screening for each type of abuse. When added as Step 3 to OLS regression models, language fluency was associated with an additional decrease in the likelihood of screening for physical (beta coefficient = -.38, P &lt; .001), sexual (beta coefficient = -.24, P = .05), and emotional abuse (beta coefficient = -.48, P &lt; .001) and increased the variance explained by the model to 25%, 17%, and 31%, respectively.
Conclusions:
Our findings support an inverse relationship between rates of screening for IPV and nurses&apos; perceptions of barriers. Barriers to screening for IPV, particularly related to knowledge and language fluency, need to be addressed to increase rates of screening on postpartum units.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/11/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Margaret Guillery</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karen Benzies</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cynthia Mannion</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sheila Evans</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2012, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-11-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1472-6955-11-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/11/1">
        <title>Nurses&apos; preparedness to care for women exposed to Intimate partner violence: a quantitative study in primary health care. </title>
        <description>Background:
Intimate partner violence (IPV) has a deep impact on women&apos;s health. Nurses working in primary health care need to be prepared to identify victims and offer appropriate interventions, since IPV is often seen in primary health care. The aim of the study was to assess nurses&apos; preparedness to identify and provide nursing care to women exposed to IPV who attend primary health care.MethodData was collected using a questionnaire to nurses at the primary health care centres. The response rate was 69.3%. Logistic regression analysis was used to test relationships among variables.
Results:
Shortcomings were found regarding preparedness among nurses. They lacked organisational support e.g. guidelines, collaboration with others and knowledge regarding the extensiveness of IPV. Only half of them always asked women about violence and mostly when a woman was physically injured. They felt difficulties to know how to ask and if they identified violence they mostly offered the women a doctor&apos;s appointment. Feeling prepared was connected to obtaining knowledge by themselves and also to identifying women exposed to IPV.
Conclusion:
The majority of the nurses were found to be quiet unprepared to provide nursing care to women exposed to IPV. Consequences might be treatment of symptoms but unidentified abuse and more and unnecessary suffering for these women. Improvements are needed on both at the level of the organisation and individual.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/11/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Eva Sundborg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nouha Saleh Stattin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Per Wandell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lena Tornkvist</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2012, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-11-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1472-6955-11-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/10/24">
        <title>Diagnostic performance of the Minimal Eating Observation and Nutrition Form - Version II (MEONF-II) and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) among hospital inpatients - a cross-sectional study</title>
        <description>Background:
The usefulness of the nutritional screening tool Minimal Eating Observation and Nutrition Form - Version II (MEONF-II) relative to Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) remains untested. Here we attempted to fill this gap by testing the diagnostic performance and user-friendliness of the MEONF-II and the NRS 2002 in relation to the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) among hospital inpatients.
Methods:
Eighty seven hospital inpatients were assessed for nutritional status with the 18-item MNA (considered as the gold standard), and screened with the NRS 2002 and the MEONF-II.
Results:
The MEONF-II sensitivity (0.61), specificity (0.79), and accuracy (0.68) were acceptable. The corresponding figures for NRS 2002 were 0.37, 0.82 and 0.55, respectively. MEONF-II and NRS 2002 took five minutes each to complete. Assessors considered MEONF-II instructions and items to be easy to understand and complete (96-99%), and the items to be relevant (87%). For NRS 2002, the corresponding figures were 75-93% and 79%, respectively.
Conclusions:
The MEONF-II is an easy to use, relatively quick and sensitive screening tool to assess risk of undernutrition among hospital inpatients. With respect to user-friendliness and sensitivity the MEONF-II seems to perform better than the NRS 2002, although larger studies are needed for firm conclusions. The different scoring systems for undernutrition appear to identify overlapping but not identical patient groups. A potential limitation with the study is that the MNA was used as gold standard among patients younger than 65 years.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/10/24</link>
                <dc:creator>Albert Westergren</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Erika Norberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Hagell</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2011, null:24</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-12-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-10-24</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1472-6955-10-24-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-12-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/10/23">
        <title>Preconditions for Successful Guideline Implementation: Perceptions of Oncology Nurses</title>
        <description>Background:
Although evidence-based guidelines are important for improving the quality of patient care, implementation in practice is below expectations. With the recent focus on team care, guidelines are intended to promote the integration of care across multiple disciplines. We conducted an exploratory study to understand oncology nurses&apos; perceptions of guideline implementation and to learn their views on how their experiences affected the implementation.
Methods:
A qualitative study was used with focus group interviews. We collected data from 11 nurses with more than 5 years of oncology nursing experience in Japan. The data were analyzed using grounded theory.
Results:
Results of the analysis identified &quot;preconditions for successful guideline implementation&quot; as a core category. There were 4 categories (goal congruence, equal partnership, professional self-development and user-friendliness) and 11 subcategories related to organizational, multidisciplinary, individual, and guideline levels.
Conclusions:
Although the guidelines were viewed as important, they were not fully implemented in practice. There are preconditions at the organizational, multidisciplinary, individual, and guideline levels that must be met if an organization is to successfully implement the guideline in clinical settings. Prioritizing strategies by focusing on these preconditions will help to facilitate successful guideline implementation.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/10/23</link>
                <dc:creator>Kaori Yagasaki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hiroko Komatsu</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2011, null:23</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-11-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-10-23</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1472-6955-10-23-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>23</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-11-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/10/22">
        <title>Perceived stress and gastrointestinal symptoms in nursing students in Korea: A cross-sectional survey</title>
        <description>Background:
Although nursing students experience a high level of stress during their training, there has been limited research on stress and its impact on the student&apos;s physical responses, such as gastrointestinal symptoms. The aims of this study are to assess the prevalence of GI symptoms in nursing students in Korea and to examine the association between the perceived stress and GI symptoms.
Methods:
A cross-sectional descriptive study design was used. A total of 715 students of a three-year associate degree nursing program in a Korean college participated. The Perceived Stress Scale and a GI Symptoms Questionnaire were administered through a self-reported system. Chi-square tests, Fisher&apos;s exact test, and logistic regression analysis were performed using SPSS 17.0.
Results:
Sixty-five percent of the nursing students experienced more than one GI symptom, with 31.1% of students reporting more than three GI symptoms. Most of the nursing students complained of upper dysmotility and bowel symptoms. In addition, students who reported higher perceived stress were significantly more likely to complain of GI symptoms. Compared to nursing students with the lowest perceived stress level, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for GI symptoms in students with the highest perceived stress level was 3.52 times higher (95% CI = 2.05-6.06).
Conclusions:
GI symptoms that are highly prevalent among nursing students are significantly associated with the perceived stress level. High perceived stress should be considered a risk factor for GI symptoms. To reduce perceived stress, stress management programs including cognitive reappraisal training are needed in nursing curriculum.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/10/22</link>
                <dc:creator>Eun Young Lee</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mi Suk Mun</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Seon Hye Lee</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ho Soon Cho</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2011, null:22</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-11-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-10-22</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1472-6955-10-22-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-11-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/10/21">
        <title>Empowerment in outpatient care for patients with chronic kidney disease - from the family members&apos; perspective</title>
        <description>Background:
Family members of persons with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease may experience feelings of vulnerability and insecurity as the disease follows its course. Against this background, the aim of the present study was to explore empowerment in outpatient care as experienced by these family members.
Methods:
An inductive approach for qualitative data analysis was chosen. The study sample comprised 12 family members of pre-dialysis patients at an outpatient kidney clinic. Two interviews with each family member were subjected to content analysis to gain an understanding of empowerment from the family members&apos; perspective.
Results:
Having strength to assume the responsibility was the main theme that emerged from the following five sub-themes: Being an involved participant, Having confirming encounters, Trusting in health-care staff, Comprehending through knowledge, and Feeling left out. Four of these five sub-themes were positive. The fifth subtheme illuminated negative experience, indicating the absence of empowerment.
Conclusions:
Family members&apos; experience of empowerment is dependent on their ability to assume the responsibility for a relative with chronic kidney disease when needed. The findings emphasise the need for a family perspective and the significance of a supportive environment for family members of persons in outpatient care.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/10/21</link>
                <dc:creator>Annette Nygardh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kerstin Wikby</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dan Malm</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gerd Ahlstrom</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2011, null:21</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-10-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-10-21</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1472-6955-10-21-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-10-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

