<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>BMC Nephrology - Latest articles</title>
		<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcnephrol/</link>
		<description>The latest articles from BMC Nephrology (ISSN 1471-2369) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/7"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/6"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/5"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/4"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/3"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/2"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/1"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/8/15"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/8/14"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/8/13"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>  
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/7">
            
            <title>Podocyte specific knock out of selenoproteins does not enhance nephropathy in streptozotocin diabetic C57BL/6 mice</title>
			<description>Background:
Selenoproteins contain selenocysteine (Sec), commonly considered the 21st genetically encoded amino acid. Many selenoproteins, such as the glutathione peroxidases and thioredoxin reductases, protect cells against oxidative stress by functioning as antioxidants and/or through their roles in the maintenance of intracellular redox balance. Since oxidative stress has been implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy, we hypothesized that selenoproteins protect against this complication of diabetes.  
Methods:
C57BL/6 mice that have a podocyte-specific inability to incorporate Sec into proteins (denoted in this paper as PodoTrsp-/-) and control mice were made diabetic by intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin, or were injected with vehicle. Blood glucose, body weight, microalbuminuria, glomerular mesangial matrix expansion, and immunohistochemical markers of oxidative stress were assessed. 
Results:
After 3 and 6 months of diabetes, control and PodoTrsp-/- mice had similar levels of blood glucose. There were no differences in urinary albumin/creatinine ratios. Periodic acid-Schiff staining to examine mesangial matrix expansion also demonstrated no difference between control and PodoTrsp-/- mice after 6 months of diabetes, and there were no differences in immunohistochemical stainings for nitrotyrosine or NAD(P)H dehydrogenase, quinone 1.
Conclusion:
Loss of podocyte selenoproteins in streptozotocin diabetic C57BL/6 mice does not lead to increased oxidative stress as assessed by nitrotyrosine and NAD(P)H dehydrogenase, quinone 1 immunostaining, nor does it lead to worsening nephropathy.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/7</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Marsha N Blauwkamp, Jingcheng Yu, MaryLee A Schin, Kathleen A Burke, Marla J Berry, Bradley A Carlson, Frank C Brosius and Ronald J Koenig</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Nephrology 2008, 9:7</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-07-22</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2369-9-7</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nephrology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2369</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-22</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/6">
            
            <title>Comparative mortality of hemodialysis patients at for-profit and not-for-profit dialysis facilities in the United States, 1998 to 2003: A retrospective analysis</title>
			<description>Background:
Concern lingers that dialysis therapy at for-profit (versus not-for-profit) hemodialysis facilities in the United States may be associated with higher mortality, even though 4 of every 5 contemporary dialysis patients receive therapy in such a setting.
Methods:
Our primary objective was to compare the mortality hazards of patients initiating hemodialysis at for-profit and not-for-profit centers in the United States between 1998 and 2003. For-profit status of dialysis facilities was determined after subjects received 6 months of dialysis therapy, and mean follow-up was 1.7 years.
Results:
Of the study population (N = 205,076), 79.9% were dialyzed in for-profit facilities after 6 months of dialysis therapy. Dialysis at for-profit facilities was associated with higher urea reduction ratios, hemoglobin levels (including levels above 12 and 13 g/dL [120 and 130 g/L]), epoetin doses, and use of intravenous iron, and less use of blood transfusions and lower proportions of patients on the transplant waiting-list (P &lt; 0.05). Patients dialyzed at for-profit and at not-for-profit facilities had similar mortality risks (adjusted hazards ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.99&#8211;1.06, P = 0.143).
Conclusion:
While hemodialysis treatment at for-profit and not-for-profit dialysis facilities is associated with different patterns of clinical benchmark achievement, mortality rates are similar.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/6</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Robert N Foley, Qiao Fan, Jiannong Liu, David T Gilbertson, Eric D Weinhandl, Shu-Cheng Chen and Allan J Collins</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Nephrology 2008, 9:6</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-06-26</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2369-9-6</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nephrology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2369</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-26</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/5">
            
            <title>Sensitivity of International Classification of Diseases codes for hyponatremia among commercially insured outpatients in the United States</title>
			<description>Background:
Administrative claims are a rich source of information for epidemiological and health services research; however, the ability to accurately capture specific diseases or complications using claims data has been debated. In this study, the authors examined the validity of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes for the identification of hyponatremia in an outpatient managed care population.
Methods:
We analyzed outpatient laboratory and professional claims for patients aged 18 years and older in the National Managed Care Benchmark Database from Integrated Healthcare Information Services. We obtained all claims for outpatient serum sodium laboratory tests performed in 2004 and 2005, and all outpatient professional claims with a primary or secondary ICD-9-CM diagnosis code of hyponatremia (276.1).
Results:
A total of 40,668 outpatient serum sodium laboratory results were identified as hyponatremic (serum sodium &lt; 136 mmol/L). The sensitivity of ICD-9-CM codes for hyponatremia in outpatient professional claims within 15 days before or after the laboratory date was 3.5%. Even for severe cases (serum sodium &#8804; 125 mmol/L), sensitivity was &lt; 30%. Specificity was > 99% for all cutoff points.
Conclusion:
ICD-9-CM codes in administrative data are insufficient to identify hyponatremia in an outpatient population.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/5</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Alisa M Shea, Lesley H Curtis, Lynda A Szczech and Kevin A Schulman</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Nephrology 2008, 9:5</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-06-18</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2369-9-5</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nephrology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2369</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-18</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/4">
            
            <title>The Lipid lowering and Onset of Renal Disease (LORD) Trial: A randomized double blind placebo controlled trial assessing the effect of atorvastatin on the progression of kidney disease</title>
			<description>Background:
There is evidence that dyslipidemia is associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Experimental studies have established that lipids are damaging to the kidney and animal intervention studies show statins attenuate this damage. Small clinical trials, meta-analyses, observational studies and post-hoc analyses of cardiovascular intervention studies all support the concept that statins can reduce kidney damage in humans. Based on this background, a double blind randomized placebo controlled trial was designed to assess the effectiveness of atorvastatin 10 mg on slowing the progression of kidney disease in a population of patients with CKD.Method/DesignThe Lipid lowering and Onset of Renal Disease (LORD) trial is a three-year, single center, multi-site, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial. The primary outcome measure is kidney function measured by eGFR calculated by both Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Cockcroft and Gault equations. Secondary outcome measures include kidney function measured by 24-hour urine creatinine clearance and also 24-hour urinary protein excretion, markers of oxidative stress, inflammation and drug safety and tolerability.DiscussionThe results of this study will help determine the effectiveness and safety of atorvastatin and establish its effects on oxidative stress and inflammation in patients with CKD.Trial RegistrationANZCTRN012605000693628</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/4</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Robert G Fassett, Madeleine J Ball, Iain K Robertson, Dominic P Geraghty and Jeff S Coombes</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Nephrology 2008, 9:4</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-03-18</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2369-9-4</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nephrology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2369</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/3">
            
            <title>A systematic review of patient and health system characteristics associated with late referral in chronic kidney disease</title>
			<description>Background:
To identify patient and health system characteristics associated with late referral of patients with chronic kidney disease to nephrologists.
Methods:
MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL were searched using the appropriate MESH terms in March 2007. Two reviewers individually and in duplicate reviewed the abstracts of 256 articles and selected 18 observational studies for inclusion. The reasons for late referral were categorized into patient or health system characteristics. Data extraction and content appraisal were done using a prespecified protocol.
Results:
Older age, the existence of multiple comorbidities, race other than Caucasian, lack of insurance, lower socioeconomic status and educational levels were patient characteristics associated with late referral of patients with chronic kidney disease. Lack of referring physician knowledge about the appropriate timing of referral, absence of communication between referring physicians and nephrologists, and dialysis care delivered at tertiary medical centers were health system characteristics associated with late referral of patients with chronic kidney disease. Most studies identified multiple factors associated with late referral, although the relative importance and the combined effect of these factors were not systematically evaluated.
Conclusion:
A combination of patient and health system characteristics is associated with late referral of patients with chronic kidney disease. Overall, being older, belonging to a minority group, being less educated, being uninsured, suffering from multiple comorbidities, and the lack of communication between primary care physicians and nephrologists contribute to late referral of patients with chronic kidney disease. Both primary care physicians and nephrologists need to engage in multisectoral collaborative efforts that ensure patient education and enhance physician awareness to improve the care of patients with chronic kidney disease.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/3</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Sankar D Navaneethan, Sarah Aloudat and Sonal Singh</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Nephrology 2008, 9:3</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-02-25</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2369-9-3</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nephrology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2369</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/2">
            
            <title>A systematic review of the prevalence and determinants of nonadherence to phosphate binding medication in patients with end-stage renal disease</title>
			<description>Background:
Cardiovascular events are the leading cause of death in end stage renal disease (ESRD). Adherence to phosphate binding medication plays a vital role in reducing serum phosphorus and associated cardiovascular risk. This poses a challenge for patients as the regimen is often complex and there may be no noticeable impact of adherence on symptoms. There is a need to establish the level of nonadherence to phosphate binding medication in renal dialysis patients and identify the factors associated with it.
Methods:
The online databases PsycINFO, Medline, Embase and CINAHL were searched for quantitative studies exploring predictors of nonadherence to phosphate binding medication in ESRD. Rates and predictors of nonadherence were extracted from the papers.
Results:
Thirty four studies met the inclusion criteria. There was wide variation in reported rates of non-adherence (22&#8211;74% patients nonadherent, mean 51%). This can be partially attributed to differences in the way adherence has been defined and measured. Demographic and clinical predictors of nonadherence were most frequently assessed but only younger age was consistently associated with nonadherence. In contrast psychosocial variables (e.g. patients' beliefs about medication, social support, personality characteristics) were less frequently assessed but were more likely to be associated with nonadherence.
Conclusion:
Nonadherence to phosphate binding medication appears to be prevalent in ESRD. Several potentially modifiable psychosocial factors were identified as predictors of nonadherence. There is a need for further, high-quality research to explore these factors in more detail, with the aim of informing the design of an intervention to facilitate adherence.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/2</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Christina Karamanidou, Jane Clatworthy, John Weinman and Rob Horne</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Nephrology 2008, 9:2</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-01-31</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2369-9-2</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nephrology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2369</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-31</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/1">
            
            <title>Prevalence and determinants of microalbuminuria among diabetic patients in the United Arab Emirates</title>
			<description>Background:
Microalbuminuria (MA) represents the earliest clinical evidence of diabetic nephropathy and is a predictor of increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of MA among diabetic patients in the Al-Ain district of the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
Methods:
The study was part of a general cross-sectional survey carried out to assess the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) complications in Al-Ain district, UAE and was the first to assess the prevalence of MA among diabetic patients. A sample of 513 diabetic patients with a mean age of 53 years (SD: &#177; 13) was randomly selected during 2003/2004. All patients completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire and underwent medical assessment. First morning urine collections were obtained and were tested for clinical proteinuria using urine dipsticks and for MA using the single Micral-Test II strips.
Results:
MA was found in 61% (95% CI: 56.7&#8211;65.7) of the sample and the rate was significantly higher among males, positively related to body mass index (BMI), type 2 DM and presence of other DM complications such as diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy. Of the total sample population, 12.5% (95% CI: 8.1-14.1) had clinical proteinuria.
Conclusion:
The prevalence rate of MA  was considerably high ( 61%) among diabetic patients in the UAE. Therefore, regular screening for MA is recommended for all diabetic patients, as early treatment is critical for reducing cardiovascular risks and slowing the progression to late stages of diabetic nephropathy (overt proteinuria and end-stage renal disease).</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/9/1</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Fatma Al-Maskari, Mohammed El-Sadig and Enyioma Obineche</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Nephrology 2008, 9:1</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-01-29</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2369-9-1</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nephrology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2369</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-29</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/8/15">
            
            <title>Analgesics use and ESRD in younger age: a case-control study</title>
			<description>Background:
An ad hoc peer-review committee was jointly appointed by Drug Authorities and Industry in Germany, Austria and Switzerland in 1999/2000 to review the evidence for a causal relation between phenacetin-free analgesics and nephropathy. The committee found the evidence as inconclusive and requested a new case-control study of adequate design.
Methods:
We performed a population-based case-control study with incident cases of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) under the age of 50 years and four age and sex-matched neighborhood controls in 170 dialysis centers (153 in Germany, and 17 in Austria) from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2004. Data on lifetime medical history, risk factors, treatment, job exposure and intake of analgesics were obtained in a standardized face-to-face interview using memory aids to enhance accuracy. Study design, study performance, analysis plan, and study report were approved by an independent international advisory committee and by the Drug Authorities involved. Unconditional logistic regression analyses were performed.
Results:
The analysis included 907 cases and 3,622 controls who had never used phenacetin-containing analgesics in their lifetime. The use of high cumulative lifetime dose (3rd tertile) of analgesics in the period up to five years before dialysis was not associated with later ESRD. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were 0.8 (0.7 &#8211; 1.0) and 1.0 (0.8 &#8211; 1.3) for ever- compared with no or low use and high use compared with low use, respectively. The same results were found for all analgesics and for mono-, and combination preparations with and without caffeine. No increased risk was shown in analyses stratifying for dose and duration. Dose-response analyses showed that analgesic use was not associated with an increased risk for ESRD up to 3.5 kg cumulative lifetime dose (98 % of the cases with ESRD). While the large subgroup of users with a lifetime dose up to 0.5 kg (278 cases and 1365 controls) showed a significantly decreased risk, a tiny subgroup of extreme users with over 3.5 kg lifetime use (19 cases and 11 controls) showed a significant risk increase. The detailed evaluation of 22 cases and 19 controls with over 2.5 kg lifetime use recommended by the regulatory advisors showed an impressive excess of other conditions than analgesics triggering the evolution of ESRD in cases compared with controls.
Conclusion:
We found no clinically meaningful evidence for an increased risk of ESRD associated with use of phenacetin-free analgesics in single or combined formulation. The apparent risk increase shown in a small subgroup with extreme lifetime dose of analgesics is most likely an indirect, non-causal association. This hypothesis, however, cannot be confirmed or refuted within our case-control study. Overall, our results lend support to the mounting evidence that phenacetin-free analgesics do not induce ESRD and that the notion of "analgesic nephropathy" needs to be re-evaluated.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/8/15</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Fokke J van der Woude, Lothar AJ Heinemann, Helmut Graf, Michael Lewis, Sabine Moehner, Anita Assmann and Doerthe K&#252;hl-Habich</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Nephrology 2007, 8:15</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2007-12-05</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2369-8-15</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nephrology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2369</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-05</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/8/14">
            
            <title>Prognosis and serum creatinine levels in acute renal failure at the time of nephrology consultation: an observational cohort study</title>
			<description>Background:
The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between acute serum creatinine changes in acute renal failure (ARF), before specialized treatment begins, and in-hospital mortality, recovery of renal function, and overall mortality at 6 months, on an equal degree of ARF severity, using the RIFLE criteria, and comorbid illnesses.
Methods:
Prospective cohort study of 1008 consecutive patients who had been diagnosed as having ARF, and had been admitted in an university-affiliated hospital over 10 years. Demographic, clinical information and outcomes were measured. After that, 646 patients who had presented enough increment in serum creatinine to qualify for the RIFLE criteria were included for subsequent analysis. The population was divided into two groups using the median serum creatinine change (101%) as the cut-off value. Multivariate non-conditional logistic and linear regression models were used.
Results:
A &#8805; 101% increment of creatinine respect to its baseline before nephrology consultation was associated with significant increase of in-hospital mortality (35.6% vs. 22.6%, p &lt; 0.001), with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.81 (95% CI: 1.08&#8211;3.03). Patients who required continuous renal replacement therapy in the &#8805; 101% increment group presented a higher increase of in-hospital mortality (62.7% vs 46.4%, p = 0.048), with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.66 (95% CI: 1.00&#8211;7.21). Patients in the &#8805; 101% increment group had a higher mean serum creatinine level with respect to their baseline level (114.72% vs. 37.96%) at hospital discharge. This was an adjusted 48.92% (95% CI: 13.05&#8211;84.79) more serum creatinine than in the &lt; 101% increment group.
Conclusion:
In this cohort, patients who had presented an increment in serum level of creatinine of &#8805; 101% with respect to basal values, at the time of nephrology consultation, had increased mortality rates and were discharged from hospital with a more deteriorated renal function than those with similar Liano scoring and the same RIFLE classes, but with a &lt; 101% increment. This finding may provide more information about the factors involved in the prognosis of ARF. Furthermore, the calculation of relative serum creatinine increase could be used as a practical tool to identify those patients at risk, and that would benefit from an intensive therapy.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/8/14</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Jose Ramon  Perez-Valdivieso, Maira Bes-Rastrollo, Pablo Monedero, Jokin de Irala and Francisco Javier Lavilla</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Nephrology 2007, 8:14</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2007-09-26</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2369-8-14</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nephrology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2369</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-26</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/8/13">
            
            <title>Clinical proof-of-concept trial to assess the therapeutic effect of sirolimus in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: SUISSE ADPKD study</title>
			<description>Background:
Currently there is no effective treatment available to retard cyst growth and to prevent the progression to end-stage renal failure in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Evidence has recently been obtained from animal experiments that activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway plays a crucial role in cyst growth and renal volume expansion, and that the inhibition of mTOR with rapamycin (sirolimus) markedly slows cyst development and renal functional deterioration. Based on these promising results in animals we have designed and initiated the first randomized controlled trial (RCT) to examine the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of sirolimus to retard disease progression in ADPKD.Method/designThis single center, randomised controlled, open label trial assesses the therapeutic effect, safety and tolerability of the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus (Rapamune&#174;) in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and preserved renal function. The primary outcome will be the inhibition of kidney volume growth measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumetry. Secondary outcome parameters will be preservation of renal function, safety and tolerability of sirolimus.DiscussionThe results from this proof-of-concept RCT will for the first time show whether treatment with sirolimus effectively retards cyst growth in patients with ADPKD.Trial registrationNCT00346918</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/8/13</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Andreas L Serra, Andreas D Kistler, Diane Poster, Marian Struker, Rudolf P W&#252;thrich, Dominik Weishaupt and Frank Tschirch</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Nephrology 2007, 8:13</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2007-09-15</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2369-8-13</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Nephrology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2369</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-15</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
    <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
