<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?journal=bmcmedphys&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Medical Physics - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmedphys/</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by BMC Medical Physics</description>
        <dc:date>2009-06-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/9/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/9/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/9/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/9/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/9/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/9/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/8/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/8/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/8/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/8/3" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/9/6">
        <title>Differential radio-sensitivities of human chromosomes 1 and 2 in one donor in interphase- and metaphase-spreads after 60Co gamma-irradiation</title>
        <description>Background:
Radiation-induced chromosome aberrations lead to a plethora of detrimental effects at cellular level. Chromosome aberrations provide broad spectrum of information ranging from probability of malignant transformation to assessment of absorbed dose. Studies mapping differences in radiation sensitivities between human chromosomes are seldom undertaken. Consequently, health risk assessment based on radio-sensitivities of individual chromosomes may be erroneous. Our efforts in this article, attempt to demonstrate differences in radio-sensitivities of human chromosome-1 and/or -2, both in interphase and metaphase spreads.
Methods:
Upon blood collection, dosimetry and irradiation were performed. Lymphocytes were isolated after whole-blood irradiation with 60Co &#947;-rays in the dose range of 0&#8211;5 Gy for both interphase, and metaphase aberration studies. Induction of premature chromosome condensation in interphase cells was accomplished using a phosphatase inhibitor, calyculin-A. Metaphase spreads were harvested from short-term peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures following colcemid arrest and using an automated metaphase harvester and spreader. Aberration analysis in both interphase and metaphase spreads were done using FISH.
Results:
In interphase, aberrant cell and aberration frequency involving chromosome 1 and/or 2 increased linearly with radiation dose. In metaphase, aberrations increased in a linear-quadratic manner with dose. Our studies ascertain that chromosome-2 is more radio-sensitive than chromosome-1 in both interphase and metaphase stages, albeit the DNA content of chromosome-2 is lesser than chromosome-1 by almost 10 million base pairs.
Conclusion:
Differences in radio-sensitivities of chromosomes have implications in genetic damage, chromosome organization, and chromosome function. Designing research experiments based on our vital findings may bring benefit to radiation-induced risk assessment, therapeutics and development of chromosome specific biomarkers.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/9/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Rupak Pathak</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Adarsh Ramakumar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Uma Subramanian</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pataje Prasanna</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Medical Physics 2009, 9:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-6649-9-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Physics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-6649</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/9/5">
        <title>Prognostic implication of late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MRI in light chain (AL) amyloidosis on long term follow up</title>
        <description>Background:
Light chain amyloidosis (AL) is a rare plasma cell dyscrasia associated with poor survival especially in the setting of heart failure. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac MRI was recently found to correlate with myocardial amyloid deposition but the prognostic role is not established. The aim is to determine the prognostic significance of LGE in AL by comparing long term survival of AL patients with and without LGE.
Methods:
Twenty nine consecutive patients (14 females; 62 &#177; 11 years) with biopsy-proven AL undergoing cardiac MRI with gadolinium as part of AL workup were included. Survival was prospectively followed 29 months (median) following MRI and compared between those with and without LGE by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses.
Results:
LGE was positive in 23 subjects (79%) and negative in 6 (21%). Left ventricular ejection fraction was 66 &#177; 17% in LGE-positive and 69 &#177; 12% in LGE-negative patients (p = 0.8). Overall 1-year mortality was 36%. On follow-up, 14/23 LGE-positive and none of LGE-negative patients died (log rank p = 0.0061). Presenting New York Heart Association heart failure class was also associated with poor survival (p = 0.0059). Survival between two LGE groups stratified by heart failure class still showed a significant difference by a stratified log-rank test (p = 0.04).
Conclusion:
Late gadolinium enhancement is common and is associated with poor long-term survival in light chain amyloidosis, even after adjustment for heart failure class presentation. The prognostic significance of late gadolinium enhancement in this disease may be useful in patient risk-stratification.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/9/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Raymond Migrino</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Richard Christenson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aniko Szabo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Megan Bright</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Seth Truran</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Parameswaran Hari</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Medical Physics 2009, 9:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-6649-9-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Physics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-6649</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/9/4">
        <title>Average arterial input function for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of neck nodal metastases</title>
        <description>Background:
The present study determines the feasibility of generating an average arterial input function (Avg-AIF) from a limited population of patients with neck nodal metastases to be used for pharmacokinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) data in clinical trials of larger populations.
Methods:
Twenty patients (mean age 50 years [range 27&#8211;77 years]) with neck nodal metastases underwent pretreatment DCE-MRI studies with a temporal resolution of 3.75 to 7.5 sec on a 1.5T clinical MRI scanner. Eleven individual AIFs (Ind-AIFs) met the criteria of expected enhancement pattern and were used to generate Avg-AIF. Tofts model was used to calculate pharmacokinetic DCE-MRI parameters. Bland-Altman plots and paired Student t-tests were used to describe significant differences between the pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from individual and average AIFs.
Results:
Ind-AIFs obtained from eleven patients were used to calculate the Avg-AIF. No overall significant difference (bias) was observed for the transfer constant (Ktrans) measured with Ind-AIFs compared to Avg-AIF (p = 0.20 for region-of-interest (ROI) analysis and p = 0.18 for histogram median analysis). Similarly, no overall significant difference was observed for interstitial fluid space volume fraction (ve) measured with Ind-AIFs compared to Avg-AIF (p = 0.48 for ROI analysis and p = 0.93 for histogram median analysis). However, the Bland-Altman plot suggests that as Ktrans increases, the Ind-AIF estimates tend to become proportionally higher than the Avg-AIF estimates.
Conclusion:
We found no statistically significant overall bias in Ktrans or ve estimates derived from Avg-AIF, generated from a limited population, as compared with Ind-AIFs.However, further study is needed to determine whether calibration is needed across the range of Ktrans. The Avg-AIF obtained from a limited population may be used for pharmacokinetic modeling of DCE-MRI data in larger population studies with neck nodal metastases. Further validation of the Avg-AIF approach with a larger population and in multiple regions is desirable.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/9/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Amita Shukla-Dave</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nancy Lee</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hilda Stambuk</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ya Wang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wei Huang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Howard Thaler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Snehal Patel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jatin Shah</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jason Koutcher</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Medical Physics 2009, 9:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-04-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-6649-9-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Physics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-6649</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-04-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/9/3">
        <title>Bone turnover markers are correlated with total skeletal uptake of 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) </title>
        <description>Background:
Skeletal uptake of 99mTc labelled methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) is used for producing images of pathological bone uptake due to its incorporation to the sites of active bone turnover. This study was done to validate bone turnover markers using total skeletal uptake (TSU) of 99mTc-MDP.
Methods:
22 postmenopausal women (52&#8211;80 years) volunteered to participate. Scintigraphy was performed by injecting 520 MBq of 99mTc-MDP and taking whole body images after 3 minutes, and 5 hours. TSU was calculated from these two images by taking into account the urinary loss and soft tissue uptake. Bone turnover markers used were bone specific alkaline phosphatase (S-Bone ALP), three different assays for serum osteocalcin (OC), tartrate resistant acid phosphatase 5b (S-TRACP5b), serum C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides of type I collagen (S-CTX-I) and three assays for urinary osteocalcin (U-OC).
Results:
The median TSU of 99mTc-MDP was 23% of the administered activity. All bone turnover markers were significantly correlated with TSU with r-values from 0.52 (p = 0.013) to 0.90 (p &lt; 0.001). The two resorption markers had numerically higher correlations (S-TRACP5b r = 0.90, S-CTX-I r = 0.80) than the formation markers (S-Total OC r = 0.72, S-Bone ALP r = 0.66), but the difference was not statistically significant. TSU did not correlate with age, weight, body mass index or bone mineral density.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, bone turnover markers are strongly correlated with total skeletal uptake of 99mTc-MDP. There were no significant differences in correlations for bone formation and resorption markers. This should be due to the coupling between formation and resorption.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/9/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Janaka Lenora</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kristina Norrgren</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ola Thorsson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Per Wollmer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karl Obrant</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kaisa Ivaska</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Medical Physics 2009, 9:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-03-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-6649-9-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Physics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-6649</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-03-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/9/2">
        <title>Repeatability of regional myocardial blood flow calculation in 82-Rb PET imaging </title>
        <description>Background:
We evaluated the repeatability of the calculation of myocardial blood flow (MBF) at rest and pharmacological stress, and calculated the coronary flow reserve (CFR) utilizing 82Rb PET imaging. The aim of the research was to prove high repeatability for global MBF and CFR values and good repeatability for regional MBF and CFR values. The results will have significant impact on cardiac PET imaging in terms of making it more affordable and increasing its use.
Methods:
12 normal volunteers were imaged at rest and during pharmacological stress, with 2220 MBq of 82Rb each. A GE Advance PET system was used to acquire dynamic 50-frame studies. MBF was calculated with a 2-compartmental model using a modified PMOD program (PMOD; University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland). Two differential equations, describing a 2-compartmental model, were solved by numerical integration and using Levenberg-Marquardt&apos;s method for fitting data. The PMOD program defines 16 standard segments and calculates myocardial flow for each segment, as well as average septal, anterior, lateral, inferior and global flow. Repeatability was evaluated according to the method of Bland and Altman.
Results:
Global rest and stress MBF, as well as global CFR, showed very good repeatability. No significant differences were found between the paired resting global MBF (0.63 &#177; 0.13 vs. 0.64 &#177; 0.13 mL/min/g; mean difference, -1.0% &#177; 2.6%) and the stress global MBF (1.37 &#177; 0.23 vs. 1.37 &#177; 0.24; mean difference, 0.1% &#177; 2.3%). Global CFR was highly reproducible (2.25 &#177; 0.56 vs. 2.22 &#177; 0.54, P = not statistically significant; mean difference, 1.3% &#177; 14.3%). Repeatability coefficients for global rest MBF were 0.033 (5.2%) and stress MBF 0.062 (4.5%) mL/min/g. Regional rest and stress MBF and CFR have shown good reproducibility. The average per sector repeatability coefficients for rest MBF were 0.056 (8.5%) and stress MBF 0.089 (6.3%) mL/min/g, and average repeatability coefficient for CFR was 0.25 (10.6%).
Conclusion:
The results of the study show that software calculation of MBF and CFR with 82Rb myocardial PET imaging is highly repeatable for global values and has good repeatability for regional values.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/9/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Karin Knesaurek</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Josef Machac</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Zhuangyu Zhang</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Medical Physics 2009, 9:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-01-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-6649-9-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Physics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-6649</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-01-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/9/1">
        <title>Chemotherapeutic Treatment Efficacy and Sensitivity are Increased by Adjuvant Alternating Electric Fields (TTFields)</title>
        <description>Background:
The present study explores the efficacy and toxicity of combining a new, non-toxic, cancer treatment modality, termed Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields), with chemotherapeutic treatment in-vitro, in-vivo and in a pilot clinical trial.
Methods:
Cell proliferation in culture was studied in human breast carcinoma (MDA-MB-231) and human glioma (U-118) cell lines, exposed to TTFields, paclitaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and dacarbazine (DTIC) separately and in combinations. In addition, we studied the effects of combining chemotherapy with TTFields in an animal tumor model and in a pilot clinical trial in recurrent and newly diagnosed GBM patients.
Results:
The efficacy of TTFields-chemotherapy combination in-vitro was found to be additive with a tendency towards synergism for all drugs and cell lines tested (combination index &#8804; 1). The sensitivity to chemotherapeutic treatment was increased by 1&#8211;3 orders of magnitude by adjuvant TTFields therapy (dose reduction indexes 23 &#8211; 1316). Similar findings were seen in an animal tumor model. Finally, 20 GBM patients were treated with TTFields for a median duration of 1 year. No TTFields related systemic toxicity was observed in any of these patients, nor was an increase in Temozolomide toxicity seen in patients receiving combined treatment. In newly diagnosed GBM patients, combining TTFields with Temozolomide treatment led to a progression free survival of 155 weeks and overall survival of 39+ months.
Conclusion:
These results indicate that combining chemotherapeutic cancer treatment with TTFields may increase chemotherapeutic efficacy and sensitivity without increasing treatment related toxicity.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/9/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Eilon Kirson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rosa Schneiderman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vladimir Dbaly</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Frantisek Tovarys</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Josef Vymazal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aviran Itzhaki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Mordechovich</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Zoya Gurvich</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Esther Shmueli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dorit Goldsher</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yoram Wasserman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yoram Palti</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Medical Physics 2009, 9:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-01-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-6649-9-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Physics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-6649</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-01-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/8/6">
        <title>Multiple window spatial registration error of a gamma camera: 133-Ba point source as a replacement of the NEMA procedure</title>
        <description>Background:
The accuracy of multiple window spatial resolution characterises the performance of a gamma camera for dual isotope imaging. In the present study we investigate an alternative method to the standard NEMA procedure for measuring this performance parameter.
Methods:
A long-lived 133Ba point source with gamma energies close to 67Ga and a single bore lead collimator were used to measure the multiple window spatial registration error. Calculation of the positions of the point source in the images used the NEMA algorithm. The results were validated against the values obtained by the standard NEMA procedure which uses a liquid 67Ga source with collimation.
Results:
Of the source-collimator configurations under investigation an optimum collimator geometry, consisting of a 5 mm thick lead disk with a diameter of 46 mm and a 5 mm central bore, was selected. The multiple window spatial registration errors obtained by the 133Ba method showed excellent reproducibility (standard deviation &lt; 0.07 mm). The values were compared with the results from the NEMA procedure obtained at the same locations and showed small differences with a correlation coefficient of 0.51 (p &lt; 0.05). In addition, the 133Ba point source method proved to be much easier to use. A Bland-Altman analysis showed that the 133Ba and the 67Ga Method can be used interchangeably.
Conclusion:
The 133Ba point source method measures the multiple window spatial registration error with essentially the same accuracy as the NEMA-recommended procedure, but is easier and safer to use and has the potential to replace the current standard procedure.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/8/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Helmar Bergmann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gregory Minear</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria Raith</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Schaffarich</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Medical Physics 2008, 8:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-12-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-6649-8-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Physics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-6649</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-12-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/8/5">
        <title>Influence of increased target dose inhomogeneity on margins for breathing motion compensation in conformal stereotactic body radiotherapy </title>
        <description>Background:
Breathing motion should be considered for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of lung tumors. Four-dimensional computer tomography (4D-CT) offers detailed information of tumor motion. The aim of this work is to evaluate the influence of inhomogeneous dose distributions in the presence of breathing induced target motion and to calculate margins for motion compensation.
Methods:
Based on 4D-CT examinations, the probability density function of pulmonary tumors was generated for ten patients. The time-accumulated dose to the tumor was calculated using one-dimensional (1D) convolution simulations of a &apos;static&apos; dose distribution and target probability density function (PDF). In analogy to stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), different degrees of dose inhomogeneity were allowed in the target volume: minimum doses of 100% were prescribed to the edge of the target and maximum doses varied between 102% (P102) and 150% (P150). The dose loss due to breathing motion was quantified and margins were added until this loss was completely compensated.
Results:
With the time-weighted mean tumor position as the isocentre, a close correlation with a quadratic relationship between the standard deviation of the PDF and the margin size was observed. Increased dose inhomogeneity in the target volume required smaller margins for motion compensation: margins of 2.5 mm, 2.4 mm and 1.3 mm were sufficient for compensation of 11.5 mm motion range and standard deviation of 3.9 mm in P105, P125 and P150, respectively. This effect of smaller margins for increased dose inhomogeneity was observed for all patients. Optimal sparing of the organ-at-risk surrounding the target was achieved for dose prescriptions P105 to P118. The internal target volume concept over-compensated breathing motion with higher than planned doses to the target and increased doses to the surrounding normal tissue.
Conclusion:
Treatment planning with inhomogeneous dose distributions in the target volume required smaller margins for compensation of breathing induced target motion with the consequence of lower doses to the surrounding organs-at-risk.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/8/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Anne Richter</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kurt Baier</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jurgen Meyer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jurgen Wilbert</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Krieger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Flentje</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Matthias Guckenberger</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Medical Physics 2008, 8:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-12-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-6649-8-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Physics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-6649</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-12-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/8/4">
        <title>Metabolism of no-carrier-added 2-[18F]fluoro-L-tyrosine in rats.</title>
        <description>Background:
Several fluorine-18 labelled fluoroamino acids have been evaluated as tracers for the quantitative assessment of cerebral protein synthesis in vivo by positron emission tomography (PET). Among these, 2-[18F]fluoro-L-tyrosine (2-[18F]Tyr) has been studied in mice at a low specific activity. Its incorporation into proteins is fast and metabolism via other pathways is limited. The present in vivo study was carried out in normal awake rats using no-carrier-added 2-[18F]Tyr. Under normal physiological conditions, we have studied the incorporation into proteins and the metabolism of the tracer in different brain areas.
Methods:
No-carrier-added 2-[18F]Tyr was administered to awake rats equipped with chronic arterial and venous catheters. The time course of the plasma activity was studied by arterial blood sampling. The biodistribution of the activity in the main organs was studied at the end of the experiment. The distribution of radioactive species in plasma and brain regions was studied by acidic precipitation of the proteins and HPLC analysis of the supernatant.
Results:
The absolute uptake of radioactivity in brain regions was homogenous. In awake rats, no-carrier-added 2-[18F]Tyr exhibits a fast and almost quantitative incorporation into the proteins fractions of cerebellum and cortex. In striatum, this incorporation into proteins and the unchanged fraction of the tracer detected by HPLC could be lower than in other brain regions.
Conclusion:
This study confirms the potential of 2-[18F]fluoro-L-tyrosine as a tracer for the assessment of the rate of protein synthesis by positron emission tomography. The observed metabolism suggests a need for a correction for the appearance of metabolites, at least in plasma.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/8/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Joel Aerts</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alain Plenevaux</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christian Lemaire</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fabrice Giacomelli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Geoffrey Warnock</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christophe Phillips</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andre Luxen</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Medical Physics 2008, 8:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-11-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-6649-8-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Physics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-6649</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-11-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/8/3">
        <title>NEOadjuvant therapy monitoring with PET and CT in Esophageal Cancer (NEOPEC-trial)</title>
        <description>Background:
Surgical resection is the preferred treatment of potentially curable esophageal cancer. To improve long term patient outcome, many institutes apply neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In a large proportion of patients no response to chemoradiotherapy is achieved. These patients suffer from toxic and ineffective neoadjuvant treatment, while appropriate surgical therapy is delayed. For this reason a diagnostic test that allows for accurate prediction of tumor response early during chemoradiotherapy is of crucial importance. CT-scan and endoscopic ultrasound have limited accuracy in predicting histopathologic tumor response. Data suggest that metabolic changes in tumor tissue as measured by FDG-PET predict response better. This study aims to compare FDG-PET and CT-scan for the early prediction of non-response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer.Methods/design: Prognostic accuracy study, embedded in a randomized multicenter Dutch trial comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for 5 weeks followed by surgery versus surgery alone for esophageal cancer. This prognostic accuracy study is performed only in the neoadjuvant arm of the randomized trial. In 6 centers, 150 consecutive patients will be included over a 3 year period.  FDG-PET and CT-scan will be performed before and 2 weeks after the start of the chemoradiotherapy. All patients complete the 5 weeks regimen of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, regardless the test results. Pathological examination of the surgical resection specimen will be used as reference standard. Responders are defined as patients with &lt; 10% viable residual tumor cells (Mandard-score).Difference in accuracy (area under ROC curve) and negative predictive value between FDG-PET and CT-scan are primary endpoints.  Furthermore, an economic evaluation will be performed, comparing survival and costs associated with the use of FDG-PET (or CT-scan) to predict tumor response with survival and costs of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy without prediction of response (reference strategy).DiscussionThe NEOPEC-trial could be the first sufficiently powered study that helps justify implementation of FDG-PET for response-monitoring in patients with esophageal cancer in clinical practice.Trial registration: ISRCTN45750457</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-6649/8/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Mark van Heijl</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jikke Omloo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark van Berge Henegouwen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Olivier Busch</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hugo Tilanus</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Patrick Bossuyt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Otto Hoekstra</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jaap Stoker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maarten Hulshof</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ate van der Gaast</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Grard Nieuwenhuijzen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Han Bonenkamp</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Plukker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ernst Spillenaar Bilgen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fibo ten Kate</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ronald Boellaard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jan Pruim</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gerrit Sloof</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>J. Jan van Lanschot</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Medical Physics 2008, 8:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-07-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1756-6649-8-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Physics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1756-6649</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-07-31T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
