BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Executive Editor

Irene Pala, BioMed Central

Editorial Board | Editorial Team | Instructions for authors | FAQ

Articles

There has been an error retrieving the data. Please try again.

Should systematic reviews drive guidelines?

Clinical guidelines are often based on the findings of systematic reviews, but overreliance on this method can lead to significant gaps in clinical care.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013, 13:25
Objective modelling of new drugs

Conceptual modelling of pharmaceutical innovations presents a method to standardize information about new drugs, which is potentially beneficial to the pharmaceutical industry, editors of drug databases, and publishers of medical journals.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013, 13:10
Decision aid informs renal replacement therapy

A patient- and family-centred decision aid assists the decision process for patients with varying levels of health literacy and cognitive function progressing toward end stage renal disease.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2012, 12:140
View more articles

RSS

Comments

Sociodemographic data

Comment on: Bartlett et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013, 12:87
Socio-demographic data

Comment on: Bartlett et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013, 12:87
Of course GS will find what you already know exists

Comment on: Gehanno et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013, 13:7

RSS

News from the web

21 May 2013: Software May Allow Doctors To Track Progression Of Cancer, Response To Treatment, And Risk Of Relapse

21 May 2013: Pharma Research: Computer Models More Accurate Than Animal Trials

21 May 2013: New App Diagnoses Heart Attacks

Scope

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making within the healthcare setting.

It is journal policy to publish work deemed by peer reviewers to be a coherent and sound addition to scientific knowledge and to put less emphasis on interest levels, provided that the research constitutes a useful contribution to the field.

RSS