<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>BMC Medical Imaging - Most viewed articles</title>
		<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmedimaging/mostviewed/</link>
		<description>Most viewed articles in last 30 days from BMC Medical Imaging (ISSN 1471-2342) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
         <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/6/9"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/7"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/10"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/15"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/2/3"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/14"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/3/1"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/5"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/12"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/9"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/6/9">
            
            <title>MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review</title>
			<description>Background:
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an alternative to diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for investigating biliary obstruction. The use of MRCP, a non-invasive procedure, may prevent the use of unnecessary invasive procedures. The aim of the study was to compare the findings of MRCP with those of ERCP by the computation of accuracy statistics.
Methods:
Thirteen electronic bibliographic databases, covering biomedical, science, health economics and grey literature were searched. A systematic review of studies comparing MRCP to diagnostic ERCP in patients with suspected biliary obstruction was conducted. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, acceptability and adverse events were reported.
Results:
25 studies were identified reporting several conditions including choledocholithiasis (18 studies), malignancy (four studies), obstruction (three studies), stricture (two studies) and dilatation (five studies). Three of the 18 studies reporting choledocholithiasis were excluded from the analysis due to lack of data, or differences in study design. The sensitivity for the 15 studies of choledocholithiasis ranged from 0.50 to 1.00 while specificity ranged from 0.83 to 1.00. The positive likelihood ratio ranged: from 5.44&#8211;47.72 and the negative likelihood ratio for the 15 studies ranged from 0.00&#8211;0.51. Significant heterogeneity was found across the 15 studies so the sensitivities and specificities were summarised by a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. For malignancy, sensitivity ranged from 0.81 to 0.94 and specificity from 0.92 to 1.00. Positive likelihood ratios ranged from 10.12 to 43 and negative likelihood ratios ranged from 0.15 to 0.21, although these estimates were less reliable.
Conclusion:
MRCP is a comparable diagnostic investigation in comparison to ERCP for diagnosing biliary obstruction.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/6/9</link>		
			<dc:creator>Eva C Kaltenthaler, Stephen J Walters, Jim Chilcott, Anthony Blakeborough, Yolanda Bravo Vergel and Steven Thomas</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Imaging 2006, 6:9</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 739</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2006-08-14</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2342-6-9</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Imaging</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2342</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2006-08-14</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/7">
            
            <title>Data-driven haemodynamic response function extraction using Fourier-wavelet regularised deconvolution</title>
			<description>Background:
We present a simple, data-driven method to extract haemodynamic response functions (HRF) from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) time series, based on the Fourier-wavelet regularised deconvolution (ForWaRD) technique. HRF data are required for many fMRI applications, such as defining region-specific HRFs, effciently representing a general HRF, or comparing subject-specific HRFs.
Results:
ForWaRD is applied to fMRI time signals, after removing low-frequency trends by a wavelet-based method, and the output of ForWaRD is a time series of volumes, containing the HRF in each voxel. Compared to more complex methods, this extraction algorithm requires few assumptions (separability of signal and noise in the frequency and wavelet domains and the general linear model) and it is fast (HRF extraction from a single fMRI data set takes about the same time as spatial resampling). The extraction method is tested on simulated event-related activation signals, contaminated with noise from a time series of real MRI images. An application for HRF data is demonstrated in a simple event-related experiment: data are extracted from a region with significant effects of interest in a first time series. A continuous-time HRF is obtained by fitting a nonlinear function to the discrete HRF coeffcients, and is then used to analyse a later time series.
Conclusion:
With the parameters used in this paper, the extraction method presented here is very robust to changes in signal properties. Comparison of analyses with fitted HRFs and with a canonical HRF shows that a subject-specific, regional HRF significantly improves detection power. Sensitivity and specificity increase not only in the region from which the HRFs are extracted, but also in other regions of interest.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/7</link>		
			<dc:creator>Alle Meije Wink, Hans Hoogduin and Jos BTM Roerdink</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Imaging 2008, 8:7</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 390</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-04-10</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2342-8-7</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Imaging</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2342</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-10</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/10">
            
            <title>Internet Image Viewer (iiV)</title>
			<description>Background:
Visualizing 3-dimensional (3-D) datasets is an important part of modern neuroimaging research. Many tools address this problem; however, they often fail to address specific needs and flexibility, such as the ability to work with different data formats, to control how and what data are displayed, to interact with values, and to undo mistakes.
Results:
iiV, an interactive software program for displaying 3-D brain images, is described. This tool was programmed to solve basic problems in 3-D data visualization. It is written in Java so it is extensible, is platform independent, and can display images within web pages.iiV displays 3-D images as 2-dimensional (2-D) slices with each slice being an independent object with independent features such as location, zoom, colors, labels, etc. Feature manipulation becomes easier by having a full set of editing capabilities including the following: undo or redo changes; drag, copy, delete and paste objects; and save objects with their features to a file for future editing. It can read multiple standard positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) file formats like ECAT, ECAT7, ANALYZE, NIfTI-1 and DICOM. We present sample applications to illustrate some of the features and capabilities.
Conclusion:
iiV is an image display tool with many useful features. It is highly extensible, platform independent, and web-compatible. This report summarizes its features and applications, while illustrating iiV's usefulness to the biomedical imaging community.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/10</link>		
			<dc:creator>Joel T Lee, Kristin R Munch, John V Carlis and Jos&#233; V Pardo</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Imaging 2008, 8:10</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 357</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-05-29</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2342-8-10</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Imaging</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2342</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-29</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/15">
            
            <title>Retraction: Evaluation of 3D surface scanners for skin documentation in forensic medicine: comparison of benchmark surfaces</title>
			<description></description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/15</link>		
			<dc:creator>Wolf Schweitzer, Martin H&#228;usler, Walter B&#228;r and Michael Schaepman</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Imaging 2008, 8:15</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 329</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2342-8-15</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Imaging</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2342</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/2/3">
            
            <title>CT features in abdominal tuberculosis: 20 years experience.</title>
			<description>Background:
Abdominal tuberculosis (TB) is endemic in the developing world and is reemerging in the West. Since computed tomography (CT) has the ability to demonstrate changes in the peritonium, mesentry, lymphnodes, bowel and solid organs and is being increasingly used for primary evaluation of abdominal conditions, it is important to be familiar with the CT features of the disease.
Methods:
CT findings were retrospectively analysed in 49 patients with proved abdominal TB. Patients with genitourinary TB and with AIDS/HIV were not included in the study.
Results:
Peritoneal involvement was the most common feature (77.5%) with ascites (wet peritonitis) seen in more than half the cases (55.2%). The rest showed peritoneal, mesenteric or omental thickening or mass formation but no ascites (dry peritonitis). Other findings included lymphadenopathy (46.9% mainly of diffuse nature, bowel wall thickening (38%) and solid organ involvement (20.4%).
Conclusions:
CT reliably demonstrates the entire range of findings which need interpretation in the light of clinical and laboratory data.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/2/3</link>		
			<dc:creator>Tariq Sinan, Mehraj Sheikh, Salwa Ramadan, Sukhpal Sahwney and Abdulla Behbehani</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Imaging 2002, 2:3</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 303</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2002-11-12</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2342-2-3</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Imaging</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2342</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2002-11-12</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/14">
            
            <title>Multidetector computed tomography angiography for assessment of in-stent restenosis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance
</title>
			<description>Background:
Multi-detector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA)of the coronary arteries after stenting has been evaluated in multiple studies. The purpose of this study was to perform a structured review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MDCTA for the detection of in-stent restenosis in the coronary arteries.
Methods:
A Pubmed and manual search of the literature on in-stent restenosis (ISR) detected on MDCTA compared with conventional coronary angiography (CA) was performed. Bivariate summary receiver operating curve (SROC) analysis, with calculation of summary estimates was done on a stent and patient basis. In addition, the influence of study characteristics on diagnostic performance and number of non-assessable segments (NAP) was investigated with logistic meta-regression. 
Results:
Fourteen studies were included. On a stent basis, Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.82(0.72-0.89) and 0.91 (0.83-0.96). Pooled negative likelihood ratio and positive likelihood ratio were 0.20 (0.13-0.32) and 9.34 ( 4.68-18.62) respectively. The exclusion of non-assessable stents and the strut thickness of the stents had an influence on the diagnostic performance. The proportion of non-assessable stents was influenced by the number of detectors, stent diameter, strut thickness and the use of an edge-enhancing kernel.
Conclusions:
The sensitivity of MDTCA for the detection of in-stent stenosis is insufficient to use this test to select patients for further invasive testing as with this strategy around 20% of the patients with in-stent stenosis would be missed. Further improvement of scanner technology is needed before it can be recommended as a triage instrument in practice. In addition, the number of non-assessable stents is also high. </description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/14</link>		
			<dc:creator>Piet K. Vanhoenacker, Isabel Decramer, Olivier Bladt, Giovanna Sarno, Erik Van Hul, William Wijns and Ben A. Dwamena</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Imaging 2008, 8:14</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 298</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2342-8-14</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Imaging</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2342</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-31</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/3/1">
            
            <title>Is fasting a necessary preparation for abdominal ultrasound?</title>
			<description>ObjectiveTo study the effect of fasting on the technical success of abdominal ultrasound examination.
Methods:
In a randomized, prospective study, 150 patients for abdominal ultrasound were divided into two groups of 75 patients each with instructions to fast for six hours or have normal breakfast respectively.ResultThe technical success of the abdominal ultrasound performed by radiologists blinded to the instruction did not differ significantly between the groups.
Conclusion:
It appears that routine fasting before abdominal ultrasound is not necessary.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/3/1</link>		
			<dc:creator>Tariq Sinan, Hans Leven and Mehraj Sheikh</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Imaging 2003, 3:1</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 256</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2003-07-22</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2342-3-1</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Imaging</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2342</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2003-07-22</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/5">
            
            <title>Abdominal ultrasonography in HIV/AIDS patients in southwestern Nigeria</title>
			<description>Background:
Though the major target of the HIV-virus is the immune system, the frequency of abdominal disorders in HIV/AIDS patients has been reported to be second only to pulmonary disease. These abdominal manifestations may be on the increase as the use of antiretroviral therapy has increased life expectancy and improved quality of life. Ultrasonography is an easy to perform, non invasive, inexpensive and safe imaging technique that is invaluable in Africa where AIDS is most prevalent and where sophisticated diagnostic tools are not readily available. Purpose: To describe the findings and evaluate the clinical utility of abdominal ultrasonography in HIV/AIDS patients in Ibadan, Nigeria
Methods:
A Prospective evaluation of the abdominal ultrasonography of 391 HIV-positive patients as well as 391 age and sex-matched HIV-negative patients were carried out at the University College Hospital, Ibadan.
Results:
Of the 391 cases studied, 260 (66.5%) were females; the mean age was 38.02 years, (range 15&#8211;66 years). The disease was most prevalent in the 4th decade with an incidence of 40.4%. Compared with the HIV-negative individuals, the HIV+ group of patients had a significantly higher proportion of splenomegaly (13.5% vs. 7.7%; p &lt; 0.01), lymphadenopathy (2.0% vs. 1.3%; p &lt; 0.70), and renal abnormalities (8.4% vs. 3.8%; p &lt; 0.02). There were no differences in hepatic and pancreatic abnormalities between the HIV+ and HIV- groups. There were significantly fewer gallstones in the HIV+ group (1.4% vs. 5.1%; p &lt; 0.01).
Conclusion:
AIDS is a multi-systemic disease and its demographic and clinical pattern remains the same globally. Ultrasonography is optimally suited for its clinical management especially in Africa. Its accuracy and sensitivity may be much improved with clinico-pathologic correlation which may not be readily available in developing countries; further studies may provide this much needed diagnostic algorithms.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/5</link>		
			<dc:creator>Millicent O Obajimi, Mojisola O Atalabi, Godwin I Ogbole, Adenike T Adeniji-Sofoluwe, Atinuke M Agunloye, Ademola J Adekanmi, Yvonne U Osuagwu, Sefiat A Olarinoye, Mojisola A Olusola-Bello, Ayotunde O Ogunseyinde, Yetunde A Aken'Ova and Isaac F Adewole</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Imaging 2008, 8:5</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 219</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-02-29</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2342-8-5</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Imaging</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2342</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-29</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/12">
            
            <title>Does applying the Canadian Cervical Spine rule reduce cervical spine radiography rates in alert patients with blunt trauma to the neck? A retrospective analysis</title>
			<description>Background:
A cautious outlook towards neck injuries has been the norm to avoid missing cervical spine injuries. Consequently there has been an increased use of cervical spine radiography. The Canadian Cervical Spine rule was proposed to reduce unnecessary use of cervical spine radiography in alert and stable patients. Our aim was to see whether applying the Canadian Cervical Spine rule reduced the need for cervical spine radiography without missing significant cervical spine injuries.
Methods:
This was a retrospective study conducted in 2 hospitals. 114 alert and stable patients who had cervical spine radiographs for suspected neck injuries were included in the study. Data on patient demographics, high risk &amp; low risk factors as per the Canadian Cervical Spine rule and cervical spine radiography results were collected and analysed.
Results:
28 patients were included in the high risk category according to the Canadian Cervical Spine rule. 86 patients fell into the low risk category. If the Canadian Cervical Spine rule was applied, there would have been a significant reduction in cervical spine radiographs as 86/114 patients (75.4%) would not have needed cervical spine radiograph. 2/114 patients who had significant cervical spine injuries would have been identified when the Canadian Cervical Spine rule was applied.
Conclusion:
Applying the Canadian Cervical Spine rule for neck injuries in alert and stable patients would have reduced the use of cervical spine radiographs without missing out significant cervical spine injuries. This relates to reduction in radiation exposure to patients and health care costs.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/12</link>		
			<dc:creator>Ulfin Rethnam, Rajam Yesupalan and Giri Gandham</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Imaging 2008, 8:12</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 192</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-06-16</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2342-8-12</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Imaging</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2342</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-16</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/9">
            
            <title>Automatic volumetry on MR brain images can support diagnostic decision making</title>
			<description>Background:
Diagnostic decisions in clinical imaging currently rely almost exclusively on visual image interpretation. This can lead to uncertainty, for example in dementia disease, where some of the changes resemble those of normal ageing. We hypothesized that extracting volumetric data from patients' MR brain images, relating them to reference data and presenting the results as a colour overlay on the grey scale data would aid diagnostic readers in classifying dementia disease versus normal ageing.
Methods:
A proof-of-concept forced-choice reader study was designed using MR brain images from 36 subjects. Images were segmented into 43 regions using an automatic atlas registration-based label propagation procedure. Seven subjects had clinically probable AD, the remaining 29 of a similar age range were used as controls. Seven of the control subject data sets were selected at random to be presented along with the seven AD datasets to two readers, who were blinded to all clinical and demographic information except age and gender. Readers were asked to review the grey scale MR images and to record their choice of diagnosis (AD or non-AD) along with their confidence in this decision. Afterwards, readers were given the option to switch on a false-colour overlay representing the relative size of the segmented structures. Colorization was based on the size rank of the test subject when compared with a reference group consisting of the 22 control subjects who were not used as review subjects. The readers were then asked to record whether and how the additional information had an impact on their diagnostic confidence.
Results:
The size rank colour overlays were useful in 18 of 28 diagnoses, as determined by their impact on readers' diagnostic confidence. A not useful result was found in 6 of 28 cases. The impact of the additional information on diagnostic confidence was significant (p &lt; 0.02).
Conclusion:
Volumetric anatomical information extracted from brain images using automatic segmentation and presented as colour overlays can support diagnostic decision making.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/8/9</link>		
			<dc:creator>Rolf A Heckemann, Alexander Hammers, Daniel Rueckert, Richard I Aviv, Christopher J Harvey and Joseph V Hajnal</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Imaging 2008, 8:9</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 189</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-05-23</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2342-8-9</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Imaging</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2342</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-23</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
	<cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
