<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>BMC Medical Education - Latest articles</title>
		<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmededuc/</link>
		<description>The latest articles from BMC Medical Education (ISSN 1472-6920) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/40"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/39"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/38"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/37"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/36"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/35"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/34"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/33"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/32"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/31"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>  
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/40">
            
            <title>Validating the effectiveness of Clinically Oriented Physiology Teaching (COPT) in undergraduate physiology curriculum</title>
			<description>Background:
It has been proved that basic science knowledge learned in the context of a clinical case is actually better comprehended and more easily applied by medical students than basic science knowledge learned in isolation. The present study intended to validate the effectiveness of Clinically Oriented Physiology Teaching (COPT) in undergraduate medical curriculum at Melaka Manipal Medical College (Manipal Campus), Manipal, India. Methods: COPT was a teaching strategy wherein, students were taught physiology using cases and critical thinking questions. Three batches of undergraduate medical students (n=434) served as the experimental groups to whom COPT was incorporated in the third block (teaching unit) of Physiology curriculum and one batch (n=149) served as the control group to whom COPT was not incorporated. The experimental group of students were trained to answer clinically oriented questions whereas the control group of students were not trained. Both the group of students undertook a block exam which consisted of clinically oriented questions and recall questions, at the end of each block. Results: Comparison of pre-COPT and post-COPT essay exam scores of experimental group of students revealed that the post-COPT scores were significantly higher compared to the pre-COPT scores. Comparison of post-COPT essay exam scores of the experimental group and control group of students revealed that the experimental group of students performed better compared to the control group. Feedback from the students indicated that they preferred COPT to didactic lectures. Conclusion: The study supports the fact that assessment and teaching patterns should fall in line with each other as proved by the better performance of the experimental group of students compared to the control group. COPT was also found to be a useful adjunct to didactic lectures in teaching physiology. </description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/40</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Reem Abraham, Komattil Ramnarayan and Asha Kamath</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Education 2008, 8:40</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6920-8-40</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Education</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6920</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>40</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-24</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/39">
            
            <title>How residents and interns utilise and perceive the personal digital assistant and UpToDate</title>
			<description>Background:
In this era of evidence-based medicine, doctors are increasingly using information technology to acquire medical knowledge. This study evaluates how residents and interns utilise and perceive the personal digital assistant (PDA) and the online resource UpToDate.
Methods:
This is a questionnaire survey of all residents and interns in a tertiary teaching hospital.
Results:
Out of 168 doctors, 134 (79.8%) responded to the questionnaire. Only 54 doctors (40.3%) owned a PDA. Although these owners perceived that the PDA was most useful for providing drug information, followed by medical references, scheduling and medical calculators, the majority of them did not actually have medical software applications downloaded on their PDAs. The greatest concerns highlighted for the PDA were the fear of loss and breakage, and the preference for working with desktop computers and paper. Meanwhile, only 76 doctors (56.7%) used UpToDate, even though the hospital had an institutional subscription for it. Although 93.4% of these users would recommend UpToDate to a colleague, only 57.9% stated that the use of UpToDate had led to a change in their management of patients.
Conclusion:
Although UpToDate and various PDA software applications were deemed useful by some of the residents and interns in our study, both digital tools were under-utilised. More should be done to facilitate the use of medical software applications on PDAs, to promote awareness of tools for evidence-based medicine such as UpToDate, and to facilitate the application of evidence-based medicine in daily clinical practice.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/39</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Jason Phua and Tow Keang Lim</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Education 2008, 8:39</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-07-14</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6920-8-39</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Education</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6920</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>39</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-14</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/38">
            
            <title>A skin abscess model for teaching incision and drainage procedures</title>
			<description>Background:
Skin and soft tissue infections are increasingly prevalent clinical problems, and it is important for health care practitioners to be well trained in how to treat skin abscesses. A realistic model of abscess incision and drainage will allow trainees to learn and practice this basic physician procedure.
Methods:
We developed a realistic model of skin abscess formation to demonstrate the technique of incision and drainage for educational purposes. The creation of this model is described in detail in this report.
Results:
This model has been successfully used to develop and disseminate a multimedia video production for teaching this medical procedure. Clinical faculty and resident physicians find this model to be a realistic method for demonstrating abscess incision and drainage.
Conclusion:
This manuscript provides a detailed description of our model of abscess incision and drainage for medical education. Clinical educators can incorporate this model into skills labs or demonstrations for teaching this basic procedure.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/38</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Michael T Fitch, David E Manthey, Henderson D McGinnis, Bret A Nicks and Manoj Pariyadath</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Education 2008, 8:38</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-07-03</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6920-8-38</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Education</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6920</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>38</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-03</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/37">
            
            <title>Factors associated with the subspecialty choices of internal medicine residents in Canada</title>
			<description>Background:
Currently, there are more residents enrolled in cardiology training programs in Canada than in immunology, pharmacology, rheumatology, infectious diseases, geriatrics and endocrinology combined. There is no published data regarding the proportion of Canadian internal medicine residents applying to the various subspecialties, or the factors that residents consider important when deciding which subspecialty to pursue. To address the concern about physician imbalances in internal medicine subspecialties, we need to examine the factors that motivate residents when making career decisions.
Methods:
In this two-phase study, Canadian internal medicine residents participating in the post graduate year 4 (PGY4) subspecialty match were invited to participate in a web-based survey and focus group discussions. The focus group discussions were based on issues identified from the survey results. Analysis of focus group transcripts grew on grounded theory.
Results:
110 PGY3 residents participating in the PGY4 subspecialty match from 10 participating Canadian universities participated in the web-based survey (54% response rate). 22 residents from 3 different training programs participated in 4 focus groups held across Canada. Our study found that residents are choosing careers that provide intellectual stimulation, are consistent with their personality, and that provide a challenge in diagnosis. From our focus group discussions it appears that lifestyle, role models, mentorship and the experience of the resident with the specialty appear to be equally important in career decisions. Males are more likely to choose procedure based specialties and are more concerned with the reputation of the specialty as well as the anticipated salary. In contrast, residents choosing non-procedure based specialties are more concerned with issues related to lifestyle, including work-related stress, work hours and time for leisure as well as the patient populations they are treating.
Conclusion:
This study suggests that internal medicine trainees, and particularly males, are increasingly choosing procedure-based specialties while non-procedure based specialties, and in particular general internal medicine, are losing appeal. We need to implement strategies to ensure positive rotation experiences, exposure to role models, improved lifestyle and job satisfaction as well as payment schedules that are equitable between disciplines in order to attract residents to less popular career choices.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/37</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Leora Horn, Katina Tzanetos, Kevin Thorpe and Sharon E Straus</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Education 2008, 8:37</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-06-26</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6920-8-37</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Education</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6920</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>37</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-26</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/36">
            
            <title>Gender sensitivity among general practitioners: Results of a training programme</title>
			<description>Background:
Gender differences contribute to patients' health and illness. However in current healthcare practices attention to gender differences is still underdeveloped. Recognizing these differences and taking them into account can improve the quality of care. In this study we aimed to investigate whether GPs' gender sensitivity can be stimulated by a training programme. The focus was on three diseases: angina pectoris, depression and urinary incontinence.
Methods:
This study had a quantitative, explorative and descriptive design. By means of a training programme 18 GPs were trained to focus on gender-sensitive recommendations for the three diseases. With standardised registration forms, data were collected during a 6-month period. During the registration period, the GPs were visited by the study team to discuss the process of data collection.
Results:
The GPs filled in registration forms for 100 patients: 39 with angina pectoris (31 women and 8 men), 40 with depression (26 women and 14 men), and 21 with urinary incontinence (20 women and 1 man). The results show that gender sensitivity can be stimulated among trained professionals. The combination of the training programme, clear and practical recommendations, daily discussion of relevant cases between the GP couples, feedback and support during registration by the study team probably contributed to the outcome.
Conclusion:
GPs' gender sensitivity was stimulated by the training programme and the supporting visits. Ideally, structural attention could be realised by embedding gender issues in existing organisational structures of general practices.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/36</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Halime H Celik, Ineke I Klinge, Trudy T van der Weijden, Guy GAM Widdershoven and Toine ALM Lagro-Janssen</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Education 2008, 8:36</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-06-26</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6920-8-36</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Education</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6920</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>36</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-26</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/35">
            
            <title>Problem-based learning and larger student groups: mutually exclusive or compatible concepts &#8211; a pilot study</title>
			<description>Background:
Problem-based learning is recognised as promoting integration of knowledge and fostering a deeper approach to life-long learning, but is associated with significant resource implications. In order to encourage second year undergraduate medical students to integrate their pharmacological knowledge in a professionally relevant clinical context, with limited staff resources, we developed a novel clustered PBL approach. This paper utilises preliminary data from both the facilitator and student viewpoint to determine whether the use of this novel methodology is feasible with large groups of students.
Methods:
Students were divided into 16 groups (20&#8211;21 students/group) and were allocated a PBL facilitator. Each group was then divided into seven subgroups, or clusters, of 2 or 3 students wh each cluster being allocated a specific case. Each cluster was then provided with more detailed clinical information and studied an individual and distinct case-study. An electronic questionnaire was used to evaluate both student and facilitator perception of this clustered PBL format, with each being asked to rate the content, structure, facilitator effectiveness, and their personal view of the wider learning experience.
Results:
Despite initial misgivings, facilitators managed this more complex clustered PBL methodology effectively within the time restraints and reported that they enjoyed the process. They felt that the cases effectively illustrated medical concepts and fitted and reinforced the students' pharmacological knowledge, but were less convinced that the scenario motivated students to use additional resources or stimulated their interest in pharmacology.Student feedback was broadly similar to that of the facilitators; although they were more positive about the scenario stimulating the use of additional resources and an interest in pharmacology.
Conclusion:
This clustered PBL methodology can be successfully used with larger groups of students. The key to success lies with challenging and well situated clinically relevant cases together with enthusiastic facilitators. Facilitator enjoyment of the PBL process may be related to adequate training and previous PBL experience, rather than academic background. The smaller number of facilitators required using this clustered PBL approach allows for facilitators with 'a belief in the philosophy of PBL' to volunteer which would again impact on the success of the process.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/35</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Martyn P Kingsbury and Joanne S Lymn</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Education 2008, 8:35</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-06-18</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6920-8-35</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Education</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6920</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>35</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-18</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/34">
            
            <title>Quality gap of educational services in viewpoints of students in Hormozgan University of medical sciences</title>
			<description>Background:
Higher education is growing fast and every day it becomes more and more exposed to globalization processes. The aim of this study was to determine the quality gap of educational services by using a modified SERVQUAL instrument among students in Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was carried out at Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences in 2007. In this study, a total of 300 students were selected randomly and asked to complete a questionnaire that was designed according to SERVQUAL methods. This questionnaire measured students' perceptions and expectations in five dimensions of service that consists of assurance, responsiveness, empathy, reliability and tangibles. The quality gap of educational services was determined based on differences between students' perceptions and expectations.
Results:
The results demonstrated that in each of the five SERVQUAL dimensions, there was a negative quality gap. The least and the most negative quality gap means were in the reliability (-0.71) and responsiveness (-1.14) dimensions respectively. Also, there were significant differences between perceptions and expectations of students in all of the five SERVQUAL dimensions (p &lt; 0.001).
Conclusion:
Negative quality gaps mean students' expectations exceed their perceptions. Thus, improvements are needed across all five dimensions.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/34</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Teamur Aghamolaei and Shahram Zare</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Education 2008, 8:34</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-06-18</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6920-8-34</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Education</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6920</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>34</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-18</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/33">
            
            <title>Identifying outcome-based indicators and developing a curriculum for a continuing medical education programme on rational prescribing using a modified Delphi process</title>
			<description>Background:
Continuing medical education (CME) is compulsory for physicians in Iran. Recent studies in Iran show that modifications of CME elements are necessary to improve the effectiveness of the educational programmes. Other studies point to an inappropriate, even irrational drug prescribing. Based on a needs assessment study regarding CME for general physicians in the East Azerbaijan province in Iran, rational prescribing practice was recognized as a high priority issue. Considering different educational methods, outcome-based education has been proposed as a suitable approach for CME. The purpose of the study was to obtain experts' consensus about appropriate educational outcomes of rational prescribing for general physicians in CME and developing curricular contents for this education.
Methods:
The study consisted of two phases: The first phase was conducted using a two-round Delphi consensus process to identify the outcome-based educational indicators regarding rational prescribing for general physicians in primary care (GPs). In the second phase the agreed indicators were submitted to panels of experts for assessment and determination of content for a CME program in the field.
Results:
Twenty one learning outcomes were identified through a modified Delphi process. The indicators were used by the panels of experts and six educational topics were determined for the CME programme and the curricular content of each was defined. The topics were 1) Principles of prescription writing, 2) Adverse drug reactions, 3) Drug interactions, 4) Injections, 5) Antibiotic therapy, and 6) Anti-inflammatory agents therapy. One of the topics was not directly related to any outcome, raising a question about the need for a discussion on constructive alignment.
Conclusions:
Consensus on learning outcomes was achieved and an educational guideline was designed. Before suggesting widespread use in the country the educational package should be tested in the CME context.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/33</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Hamideh M Esmaily, Carl Savage, Rezagoli Vahidi, Abolghasem Amini, Mohammad Hossein Zarrintan and Rolf Wahlstrom</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Education 2008, 8:33</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-05-30</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6920-8-33</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Education</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6920</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-30</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/32">
            
            <title>Factors affecting medical students in formulating their specialty preferences in Jordan</title>
			<description>Background:
In recent years there has been a growing appreciation of the issues of career preference in medicine as it may affect student learning and academic performance. However, no such studies have been undertaken in medical schools in Jordan. Therefore, we carried out this study to investigate the career preferences of medical students at Jordan University of Science and Technology and determine factors that might influence their career decisions.
Methods:
A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was carried out among second, fourth and sixth year medical students at the Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan during the academic year 2006/2007. A total of 440 students answered the questionnaire which covered demographic characteristics, specialty preferences, and the factors that influenced these career preferences. Possible influences were selected on the basis of a literature review and discussions with groups of medical students and physicians. Students were asked to consider 14 specialty options and select the most preferred career preference.
Results:
The most preferred specialty expressed by male students was surgery, followed by internal medicine and orthopaedics, while the specialty most preferred by female students was obstetrics and gynaecology, followed by pediatrics and surgery. Students showed little interest in orthopedics, ophthalmology, and dermatology. While 3.1% of females expressed interest in anesthesiology, no male students did. Other specialties were less attractive to most students.Intellectual content of the specialty and the individual's competencies were the most influential on their preference of specialty. Other influential factors were the "reputation of the specialty", "anticipated income", and "focus on urgent care".
Conclusion:
Surgery, internal medicine, pediatrics, and obstetrics and gynaecology were the most preferred specialty preferences of medical students at Jordan University of Science and Technology.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/32</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Yousef Khader, Dema Al-Zoubi, Zouhair Amarin, Ahmad Alkafagei, Mohammad Khasawneh, Samar Burgan, Khalid El Salem and Mousa Omari</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Education 2008, 8:32</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-05-23</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6920-8-32</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Education</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6920</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>32</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-23</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/31">
            
            <title>Consultant medical trainers, modernising medical careers (MMC) and the European time directive (EWTD): tensions and challenges in a changing medical education context</title>
			<description>Background:
We analysed the learning and professional development narratives of Hospital Consultants training junior staff ('Consultant Trainers') in order to identify impediments to successful postgraduate medical training in the UK, in the context of Modernising Medical Careers (MMC) and the European Working Time Directive (EWTD).
Methods:
Qualitative study. Learning and continuing professional development (CPD), were discussed in the context of Consultant Trainers' personal biographies, organisational culture and medical education practices. We conducted life story interviews with 20 Hospital Consultants in six NHS Trusts in Wales in 2005.
Results:
Consultant Trainers felt that new working patterns resulting from the EWTD and MMC have changed the nature of medical education. Loss of continuity of care, reduced clinical exposure of medical trainees and loss of the popular apprenticeship model were seen as detrimental for the quality of medical training and patient care. Consultant Trainers' perceptions of medical education were embedded in a traditional medical education culture, which expected long hours' availability, personal sacrifices and learning without formal educational support and supervision. Over-reliance on apprenticeship in combination with lack of organisational support for Consultant Trainers' new responsibilities, resulting from the introduction of MMC, and lack of interest in pursuing training in teaching, supervision and assessment represent potentially significant barriers to progress.
Conclusion:
This study identifies issues with significant implications for the implementation of MMC within the context of EWTD. Postgraduate Deaneries, NHS Trusts and the new body; NHS: Medical Education England should deal with the deficiencies of MMC and challenges of ETWD and aspire to excellence. Further research is needed to investigate the views and educational practices of Consultant Medical Trainers and medical trainees.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/8/31</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Maria Tsouroufli and Heather Payne</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Medical Education 2008, 8:31</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-05-20</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6920-8-31</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Medical Education</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6920</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>31</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
    <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
