<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?journal=bmcemergmed&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Emergency Medicine - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcemergmed/</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by BMC Emergency Medicine</description>
        <dc:date>2012-05-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/12/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/12/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/12/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/12/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/12/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/12/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/11/21" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/11/20" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/11/19" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/11/18" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/12/6">
        <title>Test-retest reliability of multidimensional dyspnea profile recall ratings in the emergency department: a prospective, longitudinal study</title>
        <description>Background:
Dyspnea is among the most common reasons for emergency department (ED) visits by patients with cardiopulmonary disease who are commonly asked to recall the symptoms that prompted them to come to the ED. The reliability of recalled dyspnea has not been systematically investigated in ED patients.
Methods:
Patients with chronic or acute cardiopulmonary conditions who came to the ED with dyspnea (N = 154) completed the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) several times during the visit and in a follow-up visit 4 to 6 weeks later (n = 68). The MDP has 12 items with numerical ratings of intensity, unpleasantness, sensory qualities, and emotions associated with how breathing felt when participants decided to come to the ED (recall MDP) or at the time of administration (&quot;now&quot; MDP). The recall MDP was administered twice in the ED and once during the follow-up visit. Principal components analysis (PCA) with varimax rotation was used to assess domain structure of the recall MDP. Internal consistency reliability was assessed with Cronbach&apos;s alpha. Test-retest reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for absolute agreement for individual items and domains.
Results:
PCA of the recall MDP was consistent with two domains (Immediate Perception, 7 items, Cronbach&apos;s alpha = .89 to .94; Emotional Response, 5 items; Cronbach&apos;s alpha = .81 to .85). Test-retest ICCs for the recall MDP during the ED visit ranged from .70 to .87 for individual items and were .93 and .94 for the Immediate Perception and Emotional Response domains. ICCs were much lower for the interval between the ED visit and follow-up, both for individual items (.28 to .66) and for the Immediate Perception and Emotional Response domains (.72 and .78, respectively).
Conclusions:
During an ED visit, recall MDP ratings of dyspnea at the time participants decided to seek care in the ED are reliable and sufficiently stable, both for individual items and the two domains, that a time lag between arrival and questionnaire administration does not critically affect recall of perceptual and emotional characteristics immediately prior to the visit. However, test-retest reliability of recall over a 4- to 6-week interval is poor for individual items and significantly attenuated for the two domains.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/12/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Mark Parshall</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paula Meek</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Sklar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joe Alcock</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paula Bittner</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2012, null:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-05-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-12-6</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-227X-12-6-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/12/5">
        <title>Correction

Involvement in emergency situations by primary care doctors on-call in Norway - a prospective population-based observational study
</title>
        <description>We have discovered that the regression analyses presented in Tables 5 and 6 in our original study [Zakariassen and Hunskaar, BMCEmerg Med 2010, 10:5] were not correct. The dependent variables were coded opposite of what intended. Here we present correct Tables 5 and 6. When comparing the original printed tables with the new ones, the reader will see that almost all odds ratios are inverted.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/12/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Erik Zakariassen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steinar Hunskaar</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2012, null:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-05-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-12-5</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-227X-12-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/12/4">
        <title>A multicenter, randomized controlled trial of immediate total-body CT scanning in trauma patients (REACT-2)</title>
        <description>Background:
Computed tomography (CT) scanning has become essential in the early diagnostic phase of trauma care because of its high diagnostic accuracy. The introduction of multi-slice CT scanners and infrastructural improvements made total-body CT scanning technically feasible and its usage is currently becoming common practice in several trauma centers. However, literature provides limited evidence whether immediate total-body CT leads to better clinical outcome then conventional radiographic imaging supplemented with selective CT scanning in trauma patients. The aim of the REACT-2 trial is to determine the value of immediate total-body CT scanning in trauma patients.Methods/designThe REACT-2 trial is an international, multicenter randomized clinical trial. All participating trauma centers have a multi-slice CT scanner located in the trauma room or at the Emergency Department (ED). All adult, non-pregnant, severely injured trauma patients according to predefined criteria will be included. Patients in whom direct scanning will hamper necessary cardiopulmonary resuscitation or who require an immediate operation because of imminent death (both as judged by the trauma team leader) are excluded. Randomization will be computer assisted. The intervention group will receive a contrast-enhanced total-body CT scan (head to pelvis) during the primary survey. The control group will be evaluated according to local conventional trauma imaging protocols (based on ATLS guidelines) supplemented with selective CT scanning. Primary outcome will be in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes are differences in mortality and morbidity during the first year post trauma, several trauma work-up time intervals, radiation exposure, general health and quality of life at 6 and 12 months post trauma and cost-effectiveness.DiscussionThe REACT-2 trial is a multicenter randomized clinical trial that will provide evidence on the value of immediate total-body CT scanning during the primary survey of severely injured trauma patients. If immediate total-body CT scanning is found to be the best imaging strategy in severely injured trauma patients it could replace conventional imaging supplemented with CT in this specific group.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov: (NCT01523626).</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/12/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Joanne Sierink</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Teun Saltzherr</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ludo Beenen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jan Luitse</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Markus Hollmann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Johannes Reitsma</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Edwards</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joachim Hohmann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Benn Beuker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Patka</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James Suliburk</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marcel Dijkgraaf</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>J Carel Goslings</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2012, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-12-4</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-227X-12-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/12/3">
        <title>Avoidable mortality from giving tranexamic acid to bleeding trauma patients: an estimation based on WHO mortality data, a systematic literature review and data from the CRASH-2 trial</title>
        <description>Background:
The CRASH-2 trial showed that early administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) safely reduces mortality in bleeding in trauma patients. Based on data from the CRASH-2 trial, global mortality data and a systematic literature review, we estimated the number of premature deaths that might be averted every year worldwide through the use of TXA.
Methods:
We used CRASH-2 trial data to examine the effect of TXA on death due to bleeding by geographical region. We used WHO mortality data (2008) and data from a systematic review of the literature to estimate the annual number of in-hospital trauma deaths due to bleeding. We then used the relative risk estimates from the CRASH-2 trial to estimate the number of premature deaths that could be averted if all hospitalised bleeding trauma patients received TXA within one hour of injury, and within three hours of injury. Sensitivity analyses were used to explore the effect of uncertainty in the parameter estimates and the assumptions made in the model.
Results:
There is no evidence that the effect of TXA on death due to bleeding varies by geographical region (heterogeneity p = 0.70). Based on WHO data and our systematic literature review, we estimate that each year worldwide there are approximately 400,000 in-hospital trauma deaths due to bleeding. If patients received TXA within one hour of injury then approximately 128,000 (uncertainty range [UR] &#8776; 72,000 to 172,000) deaths might be averted. If patients received TXA within three hours of injury then approximately 112,000 (UR &#8776; 68,000 to 148,000) deaths might be averted. Country specific estimates show that the largest numbers of deaths averted would be in India and China.
Conclusions:
The use of TXA in the treatment of traumatic bleeding has the potential to prevent many premature deaths every year. A large proportion of the potential health gains are in low and middle income countries.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/12/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Katharine Ker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Junko Kiriya</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pablo Perel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Phil Edwards</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Haleema Shakur</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ian Roberts</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2012, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-12-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-227X-12-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/12/2">
        <title>Impact of the ABCDE triage in primary care emergency department on the number of patient visits to different parts of the health care system in Espoo City</title>
        <description>Background:
Many Finnish emergency departments (ED) serve both primary and secondary health care patients and are therefore referred to as combined emergency departments. Primary care doctors are responsible for the initial assessment and treatment. They, thereby, also regulate referral and access to secondary care. Primary health care EDs are easy for the public to access, leading to non-acute patient visits to the emergency department. This has caused increased queues and unnecessary difficulties in providing immediate treatment for urgent patients. The primary aim of this study was to assess whether the flow of patients was changed by implementing the ABCDE-triage system in the EDs of Espoo City, Finland.
Methods:
The numbers of monthly visits to doctors were recorded before and after intervention in Espoo primary care EDs. To study if the implementation of the triage system redirects patients to other health services, the numbers of monthly visits to doctors were also scored in the private health care, the public sector health services of Espoo primary care during office hours and local secondary health care ED (Jorvi hospital). A face-to-face triage system was applied in the primary care EDs as an attempt to provide immediate treatment for the most acute patients. It is based on the letters A (patient sent directly to secondary care), B (to be examined within 10 min), C (to be examined within 1 h), D (to be examined within 2 h) and E (no need for immediate treatment) for assessing the urgency of patients&apos; treatment needs. The first step was an initial patient assessment by a health care professional (triage nurse). The introduction of this triage system was combined with information to the public on the &quot;correct&quot; use of emergency services.
Results:
After implementation of the ABCDE-triage system the number of patient visits to a primary care doctor decreased by up to 24% (962 visits/month) as compared to the three previous years in the EDs. The Number of visits to public sector GPs during office hours did not alter. Implementation of ABCDE-triage combined with public guidance was associated with decreased total number of doctor visits in public health care. During same period, the number of patient visits in the private health care increased. Simultaneously, the number of doctor visits in secondary health care ED did not alter.
Conclusions:
The present ABCDE-triage system combined with public guidance may reduce patient visits to primary health care EDs but not to the secondary health care EDs. Limiting the access of less urgent patients to ED may redirect the demands of patients to private sector rather than office hours GP services.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/12/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Jarmo Kantonen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ricardo Menezes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tuula Heinanen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Juho Mattila</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kari Mattila</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Timo Kauppila</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2012, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-12-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-227X-12-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/12/1">
        <title>Factors influencing injury severity score regarding Thai military personnel injured in mass casualty incident April 10, 2010: Lessons learned from armed conflict casualties: a retrospective study </title>
        <description>Background:
Political conflicts in Bangkok, Thailand have caused mass casualties, especially the latest event April 10, 2010, in which many military personnel were injured. Most of them were transferred to Phramongkutklao Hospital, the largest military hospital in Thailand. The current study aimed to assess factors influencing Injury Severity Score (ISS) regarding Thai military personnel injured in the mass casualty incident (MCI) April 10, 2010.
Methods:
A total of 728 injured soldiers transferred to Phramongkutklao Hospital were reviewed. Descriptive statistics was used to display characteristics of the injuries, relationship between mechanism of injury and injured body regions. Multiple logistic regressions were used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (adjusted OR) of ISS comparing injured body region categories.
Results:
In all, 153 subjects defined as major data category were enrolled in this study. Blast injury was the most common mechanism of injury (90.2%). These victims displayed 276 injured body regions. The most common injured body region was the extremities (48.5%). A total of 18 patients (11.7%) had an ISS revealing more than 16 points. Three victims who died were expected to die due to high Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS). However, one with high TRISS survived. Factors influencing ISS were age (p = 0.04), abdomen injury (adjusted OR = 29.9; 95% CI, 5.8-153.5; P &lt; 0.01), head &amp; neck injury (adjusted OR = 13.8; 95% CI, 2.4-80.4; P &lt; 0.01) and chest injury (adjusted OR = 9.9; 95% CI, 2.1-47.3; P &lt; 0.01).
Conclusions:
Blast injury was the most common mechanism of injury among Thai military personnel injured in the MCI April 10, 2010. Age and injured body region such as head &amp; neck, chest and abdomen significantly influenced ISS. These factors should be investigated for effective medical treatment and preparing protective equipment to prevent such injuries in the future.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/12/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Nuttapong Boonthep</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Suthee Intharachart</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tassanee Iemsomboon</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2012, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-12-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-227X-12-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/11/21">
        <title>Characteristics of frequent emergency department presenters to an Australian emergency medicine network. </title>
        <description>Background:
To describe the characteristics of emergency department (ED) patients defined as frequent presenters (FP) presenting to an Australian emergency department network and compare these with a cohort of non-frequent presenters (NFP).MethodA retrospective chart review utilising an electronic emergency medicine patient medical record database was performed on patients presenting to Southern Health EDs from March 2009 to March 2010. Non-frequent presenters were defined as patients presenting less than 5 times and frequent presenters as presenting 8 or more times in the study period. Characteristics of both groups were described and compared.
Results:
During the 12-month study period there were 540 FP patients with 4549 admissions and 73,089 NFP patients with 100,943 admissions. FP patients were slightly older with a significant increase in frequency of patients between the ages of 70 to 79 years and they were more likely to be divorced or separated than NFP patients. Frequent presenters to the emergency department were more likely to utilise the ambulance service to arrive at the hospital, or in the custody of police than NFP patients. FPs were more likely to be admitted to hospital, more likely to have an admission to a mental health bed than NFP patients and more likely to self-discharge from the emergency department while waiting for care.
Conclusions:
There are major implications for the utilisation of limited ED resources by frequent presenters. By further understanding the characteristics of FP we may be able to address the specific health care needs of this population in more efficient and cost effective ways. Further research analysing the effectiveness of targeted multidisciplinary interventions aiming to reduce the frequency of ED attendances may be warranted.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/11/21</link>
                <dc:creator>Donna Markham</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andis Graudins</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2011, null:21</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-12-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-11-21</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-227X-11-21-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-12-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/11/20">
        <title>Impact of physical fitness and biometric data on the quality of external chest compression: a randomised, crossover trial</title>
        <description>Background:
During circulatory arrest, effective external chest compression (ECC) is a key element for patient survival. In 2005, international emergency medical organisations changed their recommended compression-ventilation ratio (CVR) from 15:2 to 30:2 to acknowledge the vital importance of ECC. We hypothesised that physical fitness, biometric data and gender can influence the quality of ECC. Furthermore, we aimed to determine objective parameters of physical fitness that can reliably predict the quality of ECC.
Methods:
The physical fitness of 30 male and 10 female healthcare professionals was assessed by cycling and rowing ergometry (focussing on lower and upper body, respectively). During ergometry, continuous breath-by-breath ergospirometric measurements and heart rate (HR) were recorded. All participants performed two nine-minute sequences of ECC on a manikin using CVRs of 30:2 and 15:2. We measured the compression and decompression depths, compression rates and assessed the participants&apos; perception of exhaustion and comfort. The median body mass index (BMI; male 25.4 kg/m2 and female 20.4 kg/m2) was used as the threshold for subgroup analyses of participants with higher and lower BMI.
Results:
HR during rowing ergometry at 75 watts (HR75) correlated best with the quality of ECC (r = -0.57, p &lt; 0.05). Participants with a higher BMI and better physical fitness performed better and showed less fatigue during ECC. These results are valid for the entire cohort, as well as for the gender-based subgroups. The compressions of female participants were too shallow and more rapid (mean compression depth was 32 mm and rate was 117/min with a CVR of 30:2). For participants with a lower BMI and higher HR75, the compression depth decreased over time, beginning after four minutes for the 15:2 CVR and after three minutes for the 30:2 CVR. Although found to be more exhausting, a CVR of 30:2 was rated as being more comfortable.
Conclusion:
The quality of the ECC and fatigue can both be predicted by BMI and physical fitness. An evaluation focussing on the upper body may be a more valid predictor of ECC quality than cycling based tests. Our data strongly support the recommendation to relieve ECC providers after two minutes.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/11/20</link>
                <dc:creator>Sebastian Russo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Neumann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sylvia Reinhardt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Arnd Timmermann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andre Niklas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Quintel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christoph Eich</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2011, null:20</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-11-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-11-20</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Chest compressions linked to physical fitness</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>Assessment of BMI and physical fitness, particularly focusing on the upper body, can predict quality of external chest compressions, with rescuers with higher BMI and greater physical fitness performing better quality external chest compressions and experiencing less fatigue.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-227X-11-20-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-11-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/11/19">
        <title>Be careful with triage in emergency departments: interobserver agreement on 1,578 patients in France</title>
        <description>Background:
For several decades, emergency departments (EDs) utilization has increased, inducing ED overcrowding in many countries. This phenomenon is related partly to an excessive number of nonurgent patients. To resolve ED overcrowding and to decrease nonurgent visits, the most common solution has been to triage the ED patients to identify potentially nonurgent patients, i.e. which could have been dealt with by general practitioner. The objective of this study was to measure agreement among ED health professionals on the urgency of an ED visit, and to determine if the level of agreement is consistent among different sub-groups based on following explicit criteria: age, medical status, type of referral to the ED, investigations performed in the ED, and the discharge from the ED.
Methods:
We conducted a multicentric cross-sectional study to compare agreement between nurses and physicians on categorization of ED visits into urgent or nonurgent. Subgroups stratified by criteria characterizing the ED visit were analyzed in relation to the outcome of the visit.
Results:
Of 1,928 ED patients, 350 were excluded because data were lacking. The overall nurse-physician agreement on categorization was moderate (kappa = 0.43). The levels of agreement within all subgroups were variable and low. The highest agreement concerned three subgroups of complaints: cranial injury (kappa = 0.61), gynaecological (kappa = 0.66) and toxicology complaints (kappa = 1.00). The lowest agreement concerned two subgroups: urinary-nephrology (kappa = 0.09) and hospitalization (kappa = 0.20). When categorization of ED visits into urgent or nonurgent cases was compared to hospitalization, ED physicians had higher sensitivity and specificity than nurses (respectively 94.9% versus 89.5%, and 43.1% versus 30.9%).
Conclusions:
The lack of physician-nurse agreement and the inability to predict hospitalization have important implications for patient safety. When urgency screening is used to determine treatment priority, disagreement might not matter because all patients in the ED are seen and treated. But using assessments as the basis for refusal of care to potential nonurgent patients raises legal, ethical, and safety issues. Managed care organizations should be cautious when applying such criteria to restrict access to EDs.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/11/19</link>
                <dc:creator>Anne-Claire Durand</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stephanie Gentile</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Patrick Gerbeaux</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marc Alazia</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pierre Kiegel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stephane Luigi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eric Lindenmeyer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Philippe Olivier</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marie-Annick Hidoux</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Roland Sambuc</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2011, null:19</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-10-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-11-19</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-227X-11-19-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-10-31T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/11/18">
        <title>Injury in China: a systematic review of injury surveillance studies conducted in Chinese hospital emergency departments</title>
        <description>Background:
Injuries represent a significant and growing public health concern in China. This Review was conducted to document the characteristics of injured patients presenting to the emergency department of Chinese hospitals and to assess of the nature of information collected and reported in published surveillance studies.
Methods:
A systematic search of MEDLINE and China Academic Journals supplemented with a hand search of journals was performed. Studies published in the period 1997 to 2007 were included and research published in Chinese was the focus. Search terms included emergency, injury, medical care.
Results:
Of the 268 studies identified, 13 were injury surveillance studies set in the emergency department. Nine were collaborative studies of which eight were prospective studies. Of the five single centre studies only one was of a prospective design. Transport, falls and industrial injuries were common mechanisms of injury. Study strengths were large patient sample sizes and for the collaborative studies a large number of participating hospitals. There was however limited use of internationally recognised injury classification and severity coding indices.
Conclusion:
Despite the limited number of studies identified, the scope of each highlights the willingness and the capacity to conduct surveillance studies in the emergency department. This Review highlights the need for the adoption of standardized injury coding indices in the collection and reporting of patient health data. While high level injury surveillance systems focus on population-based priority setting, this Review demonstrates the need to establish an internationally comparable trauma registry that would permit monitoring of the trauma system and would by extension facilitate the optimal care of the injured patient through the development of informed quality assurance programs and the implementation of evidence-based health policy.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/11/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Michael Fitzharris</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James Yu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Naomi Hammond</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Colman Taylor</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yangfeng Wu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Simon Finfer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Myburgh</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2011, null:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-10-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-11-18</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1471-227X-11-18-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-10-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

