Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation and BioMed Central.

Open Access Review

Obesity, knee osteoarthritis and knee arthroplasty: a review

Saif Salih* and Paul Sutton

Author Affiliations

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Northern General Hospital, Herries Rd, Sheffield S5 7 AU, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation 2013, 5:25  doi:10.1186/2052-1847-5-25


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/2052-1847/5/25


Received:20 November 2013
Accepted:24 November 2013
Published:4 December 2013

© 2013 Salih and Sutton; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Abstract

The incidence of obesity is rising worldwide. Obesity is a risk factor for developing osteoarthritis in the knee. Obesity and knee osteoarthritis are independently disabling conditions and in combination pose difficult therapeutic challenges. This review will discuss obesity, osteoarthritis, and the problems associated with knee osteoarthritis in an obese population. Treatment options including surgery and its success will be discussed.

Keywords:
Obesity; Knee osteoarthritis; Knee arthroplasty

Introduction

Obesity

Obesity is defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO) as a body mass index (BMI) of greater than 30 kg/m2 that may impair a person’s health [1]. A BMI between 25 kg/m2 and 30 kg/m2 is defined overweight. It is important to note the WHO includes in its definition that this excess weight is caused by adipose tissue. Athletic muscular individuals may possess a BMI greater than 30 kg/m2 but would not be defined as obese. In England, the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommends the use of waist circumference (greater than 102 cm in males and 88 cm in females) in conjunction with BMI to define obesity [2].

The cause of obesity has been a subject for debate for over a century and remains controversial [3]. Some contend that obesity is caused by overeating alone, and a net positive calorific intake leads to weight gain [4]. An alternative hypothesis is that the type of calorific intake is important and that the increase in refined sugars as a proportion of our diet is responsible for the rise in obesity [5]. Others argue that it is not merely the individual’s dietary intake, but host factors such as abnormal biochemical processing, or hormonal factors contribute [3]. Research on how diet affects body weight is difficult to control and therefore much of the evidence is retrospective [6]. Although there is a need for well controlled prospective studies to guide future management of obesity and public health policy there is without doubt at present a significant disease burden as a direct result of obesity [3].

Epidemiology

The WHO estimates that that the prevalence of obesity has more than doubled since 1980, with more 10% of the world’s population being defined as obese [1]. In England up to a quarter of the population are obese [7], with a slightly higher prevalence in women compared to men [7]. This is not unique to the population of England. In 18 out 27 European Union member states over 50% of adults are overweight or obese. Similarly one third of adults in the United States, and China are obese.

Health effects

Overweight and obesity are the fifth leading risk for global deaths and account for an estimated 44% of the diabetes burden, 23% of the ischaemic heart disease burden and between 7% and 41% of cancer burdens [1]. There is a clear link between Osteoarthritis (OA) and obesity, which will be discussed in more detail within this review.

Review

Osteoarthritis

OA may be defined as a condition characterised by progressive loss of articular cartilage within a joint resulting in pain [8]. It had previously been classed as a non-inflammatory joint degeneration but there is increasing evidence that the Greek etymology (osteo- bone, arthr- joint, itis- inflammation) is a more accurate reflection of the pathophysiology [9].

OA may be classified as primary or secondary [10]. Primary OA appears to have a genetic basis but no other underlying pre-determinants. Secondary OA may develop as a consequence of multiple causes (see Table 1). There is a greater prevalence of OA between siblings and especially identical twins [11]. Frizzle related protein 3 and Asporin have been identified from large genetic studies as potentially important genes contributing to OA [12].

Table 1. Causes of secondary OA

OA is frequently described to patients as ‘wear and tear’ that occurs with age; however, there are subtle differences between the changes in articular cartilage that occur with age and those seen in OA [9]. The hyaline cartilage that lines synovial joints consists of chondrocytes and an extracellular matrix [13]. A normal extracellular matrix is 75% water held by long proteoglycan chains. With age these chains shorten, the water content, and the number of chondrocytes decrease. In OA there is an initial increase in water content and chondrocyte number and it is postulated that this is a chondrocyte healing response to abnormal stresses [14]. With progressive disease, chondrocyte numbers and proteoglycan content fall, as does water content. This results in further damage to the articular cartilage and the release of chondral debris and inflammatory mediators. This triggers the innate immune system and starts a chronic inflammatory cycle that further damages the joint [9]. The inflammatory mediators present in osteoarthritic joints are similar to those found in rheumatoid joints but present at lower concentrations.

Epidemiology

OA affects roughly 8 million people in the United Kingdom and approximately 27 million people in the United States [15]. The prevalence of OA increases with age. The presence of radiological changes of OA in many joints also increases with age. The reporting of pain increases with increasing severity of radiographic changes [16] but this does not mean radiographic changes equate to pain. In one study half of men and a fifth of women with severe radiographic changes in their hip or knee did not report pain [17]. The presence of osteophytes on a skyline view of the knee appears most predictive of knee symptoms.

Knee OA

The knee joint is commonly affected by OA. The prevalence of knee OA is rising and this may be, at least in part, due to the rising prevalence of obesity and an ageing population [18]. The Dutch cohort from Zoetemeer showed increasing radiographic knee OA with age with over half of women and a quarter of men having evidence of disease [19]. There was no significant difference between the left and right knee. Data from the Framingham cohort has shown self-reported knee pain has tripled in men and doubled in women over thirty years [18]. This disease burden appears to be increasing worldwide. The prevalence of knee pain and OA in the Indian subcontinent is approximately 35% [20]. The prevalence of knee pain in the same ethnic group living in England is much greater but the rate of OA within this group is very similar. The increase in knee pain may be attributable to an unexplained increase in rheumatoid arthritis [21].

OA and obesity

Obesity is a recognised risk factor for developing knee OA [22]. Several large studies have directly correlated obesity with the knee OA [22]–[25]. A meta-analysis of these demonstrated that there is an almost threefold increase in the risk of developing OA within an obese or overweight population [25]. This analysis also demonstrated that the risk of developing OA increased in proportion with increasing weight. Of all the studies meeting the inclusion criteria in this meta-analysis only one did not show a statistically significant increase in prevalence of OA with increasing BMI [24]. However, this study did show a three-fold increase in the relative risk of developing knee pain over a three-year period with obesity.

In identical twins the risk of developing radiographic changes at the patella-femoral and tibio-femoral joints increases with weight [23]. For every kilogram of extra weight there is a 9-13% increased risk of developing symptomatic OA. On average twins with radiographic signs of tibio-femoral OA were 2.93 kg heavier and those with patella-femoral disease were 3.50 kg heavier. The patella-femoral joint appears to be particularly susceptible to radiographic changes with increased cartilage loss with increasing BMI even in asymptomatic women [26].

The mechanical theory for the increased prevalence of OA in obesity proposes that the extra force across a joint from increased body mass is the cause, however this theory is unlikely to explain the increased prevalence of OA found in the hands of those with a raised BMI [23]. Obesity is part of the diagnostic criteria for metabolic syndrome, which is linked with a chronic low-grade pro-inflammatory state [27]. This may provide a biochemical explanation for the link between obesity and OA [14]. Adipokines have been implicated as a potential mediator of this effect. Adipokines are cytokines that are predominantly released by adipose tissue into the bloodstream [28]. Adiponectin is one of these adipokines and its concentration is increased in patients with OA, especially in obese females. However this same study demonstrated there was only a weak correlation between increased adiponectin and synovial inflammation and there was no direct correlation with articular cartilage damage [29]. In another study increased adipokines and adipokine receptors were associated with cartilage damage, but not with obesity [30]. A large study of over 1000 patients suggested that elevated adiponectin and resistin (another adipokine) were only weakly associated with OA and obesity but there was a stronger positive correlation between OA and obesity and leptin [31].

Magnetic resonance imaging studies of overweight patients are interesting. One study correlated increased body weight with a greater presence of bone marrow lesions and cartilage defects but not with knee pain [32]. Further studies demonstrated that, regardless of pre-existing radiographic severity, weight loss improved knee pain symptoms [33], but does not improve the MRI appearance of cartilage defects or bone marrow lesions [34]. These findings highlight that knee pain is subjective, as is the perception of disability secondary to knee pain [35]. Data from the Chingford cohort demonstrates that a raised BMI is an independent risk factor for self-reported knee pain regardless of radiographic severity of disease [36].

Despite evidence that weight loss can improve knee pain symptoms many patients claim that their knee pain precludes losing weight [37]. Patients with a BMI >35 kg/m2 are recognised to undergo surgery for OA an earlier age [38]. The reasons for this are multifactorial but in part may be that obese patients with OA are more likely to seek a surgical solution than those of a normal BMI.

Arthroplasty in obese individuals

Associated with an ageing population and rising rates of obesity, the number of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) are rising and now surpass total hip arthroplasty (THA) [39]. It is anticipated that the number of TKA being performed in the overweight and obese is likely to continue to rise [40]. The success, failure and outcome of TKA are potentially altered in overweight or obese patients [37,38,41]–[43].

TKA in obese individuals is technically more challenging, takes longer to perform and larger exposures are required to provide surgical access. The risk of intra-operative surgical complications is higher in patients with an elevated BMI. These include higher blood transfusion requirements as a result of operative blood loss [44], difficulty in identifying anatomy leading to iatrogenic damage (in particular medial collateral ligament avulsion [45]), or mal-alignment of the prosthesis [46].

The risk of post-operative complications in obese patients is also reportedly raised with rates as high as 32% [44,45,47]. This rate is primarily caused by superficial and deep surgical site infections and post-operative venous-thromboembolic (VTE) complications [48]. For THA and TKA the risk of VTE disease increases by 1.5 for every 5 kg/m2 of increased BMI [49]. A meta-analysis of surgical complications showed deep infection requiring surgical debridement occurs more frequently in obese individuals with an odds ratio of 2.38 and the risk of infection is 1.9 times greater [41]. However with the data available from the included studies, the risk of revision for infection was not significantly higher in obese individuals. Interestingly this same meta-analysis suggests that there is no increased risk of intra-operative injury, or post-operative VTE complication as a result of obesity. In contrast to other studies a further confounding analysis of Italian registry data of nearly 9000 patients suggested no significant increase in intra-operative complication, or post-operative infection, VTE disease or death in the obese group [50]. In conclusion the evidence suggests a higher risk of intra and post-operative complications of TKA for OA in obese patients but there remains some controversy in this area.

Implant survival

Data from THR wear studies suggests that implant survival is reduced in obese patients [51]. In light of this evidence it has been hypothesised that TKA would also fail more quickly in obese individuals because the increased load across the implant would increase wear. It is important to note that the mechanism of wear occurring in a TKA is different to that that is generated at a THA.

There is evidence that at five years obese patients had no increased revision rate compared with patients with a normal BMI. The authors of this study suggested that the follow-up period was too short to detect any difference or that obese patients were less active, offsetting the effect of increased loads across the joint [43]. A further study with a longer follow-up period demonstrated that at seven years the implant failure rate, as defined either clinically (Knee Society Score- KSS) or radiographically, is significantly higher in the obese population [52]. Meta-analysis shows that the overall revision rate is 1.79 times higher in an obese group of patients compared with patients with a normal BMI after five years follow up [41]. This, however, is ‘all cause’ revision and includes both revision for infection and aseptic failures. In one series the revision rate for infection was 6% [45]. It is likely that higher implant failure and revision rates in obese patients are likely to be attributable to a higher rate of wear, aseptic loosening and infection [41]. Vazquez-Vela’s et al. [53] showed that at ten years only a third of TKA in obese men aged under 60 years survived. In comparison the highest survival rate was 99.42% in non-obese women aged over 60 years.

Following TKR obese patients do report an improvement in symptoms based on the KSS [43,54,55]. Many groups report that post-operative KSS is significantly lower in an obese population, however, the level of improvement is similar to the non-obese group [45,54,55]. Several groups report that the obese are less happy with their TKA [37,42] but these patients may appear to perform worse because of other medical co-morbidities [37]. Pre-operative obesity attributed to the inability to exercise because of knee pain does not appear to resolve with surgery. Dowsey et al. [37] reported that 21% of an obese group of patients gained weight and only 14% lost weight after TKA.

The morbidly obese represent a different subclass within the overweight and obese population. These are defined as patients with a BMI >35 kg/m2[1]. There is evidence that this group responds differently to the group of patients who are overweight or obese (but not considered morbidly obese) to TKA.

The surgical challenges are more extreme in the morbidly obese, they are slower to recover post-operatively [54] and have a greater rate of complications [48,55,56]. With a BMI >40 kg/m2 patients have lower self-reported outcome scores, increased radiographic evidence of aseptic loosening and higher revision rates [48]. Patient reported outcome is worse in the morbidly obese compared to the non-morbidly obese but the morbidly obese show bigger improvements in function when compared to their pre-operative state [57] and by three years the morbidly obese appear to do as well as non-obese counterparts [54].

Interestingly survival at 80 months appears better in the morbidly obese compared with non-morbidly obese patients, but both are worse than the non-obese patients [52]. The explanation for this may be because the morbidly obese are less active than the non-morbidly obese. A further confounding effect is suggested by some studies, which point to data skewing of the whole obese population by the subgroup of the morbidly obese. Some authors claim that if the non-morbidly obese are analysed independently of the morbidly obese population they behave in a similar manner to a non-obese population in terms of outcome and implant survival [55]. In the authors’ opinion weight loss in the morbidly obese prior to knee surgery should be advised to reduce complication rate and improve long-term outcome. Bariatric surgery may be considered as a method of rapid weight loss prior to TKA and there is evidence that this improves the radiographic evidence of OA and symptoms [58]. There is however only limited evidence that this improves post-operative complication rates for those who undergo TKA and are morbidly obese prior to knee surgery [59].

Conclusions

Obesity is an increasing worldwide problem and the demand for TKA in this patient group is likely to continue to increase.

Obese patients are at greater risk of peri-operative complications and the overall evidence suggests they are at increased risk of premature joint failure and revision. The overall outcome of TKA in obese patients is worse than the non-obese group; however, the absolute improvements are similar in both groups. Obese patients should not expect TKA to enable them to lose weight.

There is data to support the use of TKA in an obese population and that it can provide long term benefit, but the patients must be made aware of the increased risk of peri-operative complications, the potential for re-operation and advantages of weight loss prior to surgical treatment.

Abbreviations

WHO: World health organisation; BMI: Body mass index; NICE: National institute for clinical excellence; OA: Osteoarthritis; TKA: Total knee arthroplasty; THA: Total hip arthroplasty; VTE: Venous thrombo-embolic; KSS: Knee society score.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

SS performed the literature search and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. PS conceived the article, critically reviewed the first draft of the manuscript. Both authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Authors’ information

SS is an orthopaedic trainee at registrar level. SS is currently undertaking a subspecialty rotation in knee arthroplasty and soft tissue knee surgery. PS is a consultant orthopaedic surgeon of over twenty years’ experience. He has a specialist interest in knee surgery.

References

  1. WHO:

    Obesity and overweight.

    http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/ webcite

    OpenURL

  2. Obesity.

    http://www.nice.org.uk/ webcite

    OpenURL

  3. Taubes G: The science of obesity: what do we really know about what makes us fat? An essay by Gary Taubes.

    BMJ 2013, 346:f1050. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Newburgh LH, Johnston MW: The nature of obesity 12.

    J Clin Invest 1930, 8:197-213. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  5. Te Morenga L, Mallard S, Mann J: Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies.

    BMJ 2013, 346:e7492. OpenURL

  6. Cottrell RC, Wittekind A: Conclusions of review of dietary sugars and body weight are unwarranted.

    BMJ 2013, 346:f1238-f1238. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Health and Social Care Information Centre - Obesity statistics.

    http://www.hscic.gov.uk/article/2021/Website-Search?productid=11194&q=obesity&sort=Relevance&size=10&page=1&area=both#top webcite

    OpenURL

  8. Buckwaler JA, Mankin HJ: Instructional course lectures, the American academy of orthopaedic surgeons - articular cartilage. Part II: degeneration and osteoarthrosis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation*†.

    J Bone Jt Surg 1997, 79:612-632. OpenURL

  9. Sokolove J, Lepus CM: Role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis: latest findings and interpretations.

    Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2013, 5:77-94. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  10. Solomon L, Warwick D, Nayagam S, Apley AG: Apley’s system of orthopaedics and fractures. London: Hodder Arnold; 2010. OpenURL

  11. Zhang Y, Jordan JM: Epidemiology of osteoarthritis.

    Clin Geriatr Med 2010, 26:355-369. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  12. Valdes AM, McWilliams D, Arden NK, Doherty SA, Wheeler M, Muir KR, Zhang W, Cooper C, Maciewicz RA, Doherty M: Involvement of different risk factors in clinically severe large joint osteoarthritis according to the presence of hand interphalangeal nodes.

    Arthritis Rheum 2010, 62:2688-2695. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Ramachandran M: Stanmore Basic Orthopaedic Sciences: The Stanmore Guide. 1st edition. New York, USA: Hodder Arnold; 2006. OpenURL

  14. Berenbaum F, Eymard F, Houard X: Osteoarthritis, inflammation and obesity.

    Curr Opin Rheumatol 2013, 25:114-118. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. NICE: NICE Clinical Guideline 59 - Osteoarthritis. Manchester, UK: NICE; 2008. OpenURL

  16. Arden N, Nevitt MC: Osteoarthritis: epidemiology.

    Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2006, 20:3-25. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Cicuttini FM, Baker J, Hart DJ, Spector TD: Association of pain with radiological changes in different compartments and views of the knee joint.

    Osteoarthr Cartil OARS Osteoarthr Res Soc 1996, 4:143-147. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  18. Nguyen U-SDT, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Niu J, Zhang B, Felson DT: Increasing prevalence of knee pain and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: survey and cohort data.

    Ann Intern Med 2011, 155:725-732. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  19. Van Saase JL, van Romunde LK, Cats A, Vandenbroucke JP, Valkenburg HA: Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: Zoetermeer survey. Comparison of radiological osteoarthritis in a Dutch population with that in 10 other populations.

    Ann Rheum Dis 1989, 48:271-280. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  20. Farooqi A, Gibson T: Prevalence of the major rheumatic disorders in the adult population of north Pakistan.

    Br J Rheumatol 1998, 37:491-495. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. Allison TR, Symmons DPM, Brammah T, Haynes P, Rogers A, Roxby M, Urwin M: Musculoskeletal pain is more generalised among people from ethnic minorities than among white people in Greater Manchester.

    Ann Rheum Dis 2002, 61:151-156. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  22. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Naimark A, Walker AM, Meenan RF: Obesity and knee osteoarthritis. The Framingham study.

    Ann Intern Med 1988, 109:18-24. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  23. Cicuttini F, Baker J, Spector TD: The association of obesity with osteoarthritis of the hand and knee in women: a twin study.

    J Rheumatol 1996, 23:1221-1226. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  24. Jinks C, Jordan K, Croft P: Disabling knee pain–another consequence of obesity: results from a prospective cohort study.

    BMC Public Health 2006, 6:258. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  25. Blagojevic M, Jinks C, Jeffery A, Jordan KP: Risk factors for onset of osteoarthritis of the knee in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Osteoarthr Cartil OARS Osteoarthr Res Soc 2010, 18:24-33. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  26. Gunardi AJ, Brennan SL, Wang Y, Cicuttini FM, Pasco JA, Kotowicz MA, Nicholson GC, Wluka AE: Associations between measures of adiposity over 10 years and patella cartilage in population-based asymptomatic women.

    Int J Obes 2005 2013.

    doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.42

    OpenURL

  27. IDF Consensus Definition Metabolic Syndrome.

    http://www.idf.org/publications/idf-consensus-definition-metabolic-syndrome webcite

    OpenURL

  28. Osborn O, Olefsky JM: The cellular and signaling networks linking the immune system and metabolism in disease.

    Nat Med 2012, 18:363-374. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  29. De Boer TN, van Spil WE, Huisman AM, Polak AA, Bijlsma JWJ, Lafeber FPJG, Mastbergen SC: Serum adipokines in osteoarthritis; comparison with controls and relationship with local parameters of synovial inflammation and cartilage damage.

    Osteoarthr Cartil OARS Osteoarthr Res Soc 2012, 20:846-853. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  30. Berry PA, Jones SW, Cicuttini FM, Wluka AE, Maciewicz RA: Temporal relationship between serum adipokines, biomarkers of bone and cartilage turnover, and cartilage volume loss in a population with clinical knee osteoarthritis.

    Arthritis Rheum 2011, 63:700-707. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  31. Van Spil WE, Welsing PMJ, Kloppenburg M, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Bijlsma JWJ, Mastbergen SC, Lafeber FPJG: Cross-sectional and predictive associations between plasma adipokines and radiographic signs of early-stage knee osteoarthritis: data from CHECK.

    Osteoarthr Cartil OARS Osteoarthr Res Soc 2012, 20:1278-1285. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  32. Berry PA, Wluka AE, Davies-Tuck ML, Wang Y, Strauss BJ, Dixon JB, Proietto J, Jones G, Cicuttini FM: The relationship between body composition and structural changes at the knee.

    Rheumatol Oxf Engl 2010, 49:2362-2369. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  33. Gudbergsen H, Boesen M, Lohmander LS, Christensen R, Henriksen M, Bartels EM, Christensen P, Rindel L, Aaboe J, Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Riecke BF, Bliddal H: Weight loss is effective for symptomatic relief in obese subjects with knee osteoarthritis independently of joint damage severity assessed by high-field MRI and radiography.

    Osteoarthr Cartil OARS Osteoarthr Res Soc 2012, 20:495-502. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  34. Gudbergsen H, Boesen M, Christensen R, Astrup A, Bliddal H: Radiographs and low field MRI (0.2T) as predictors of efficacy in a weight loss trial in obese women with knee osteoarthritis.

    BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011, 12:56. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  35. Karvonen-Gutierrez CA, Sowers MR, Heeringa SG: Sex dimorphism in the association of cardiometabolic characteristics and osteophytes-defined radiographic knee osteoarthritis among obese and non-obese adults: NHANES III.

    Osteoarthr Cartil OARS Osteoarthr Res Soc 2012, 20:614-621. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  36. Goulston LM, Kiran A, Javaid MK, Soni A, White KM, Hart DJ, Spector TD, Arden NK: Does obesity predict knee pain over fourteen years in women, independently of radiographic changes?

    Arthritis Care Res 2011, 63:1398-1406. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  37. Dowsey MM, Liew D, Stoney JD, Choong PF: The impact of pre-operative obesity on weight change and outcome in total knee replacement: a prospective study of 529 consecutive patients.

    J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92:513-520. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  38. Changulani M, Kalairajah Y, Peel T, Field RE: The relationship between obesity and the age at which hip and knee replacement is undertaken.

    J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:360-363. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  39. NJR: 9th Annual Report; National Joint Registry. Hemel Hempsted UK: NJR Centre; 2012. OpenURL

  40. Vasarhelyi EM, MacDonald SJ: The influence of obesity on total joint arthroplasty.

    J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012, 94:100-102. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  41. Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Servien E, Dunn W, Dahm D, Bramer JAM, Haverkamp D: The influence of obesity on the complication rate and outcome of total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic literature review.

    J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012, 94:1839-1844. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  42. Järvenpää J, Kettunen J, Soininvaara T, Miettinen H, Kröger H: Obesity has a negative impact on clinical outcome after total knee arthroplasty.

    Scand J Surg SJS Off Organ Finn Surg Soc Scand Surg Soc 2012, 101:198-203. OpenURL

  43. Amin AK, Patton JT, Cook RE, Brenkel IJ: Does obesity influence the clinical outcome at five years following total knee replacement for osteoarthritis?

    J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88:335-340. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  44. Pritchett JW, Bortel DT: Knee replacement in morbidly obese women.

    Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991, 173:119-122. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  45. Winiarsky R, Barth P, Lotke P: Total knee arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients.

    J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998, 80:1770-1774. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  46. Krushell RJ, Fingeroth RJ: Primary total knee arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients: a 5- to 14-year follow-up study.

    J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:77-80. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  47. Sridhar MS, Jarrett CD, Xerogeanes JW, Labib SA: Obesity and symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee.

    J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012, 94:433-440. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  48. Amin AK, Clayton RAE, Patton JT, Gaston M, Cook RE, Brenkel IJ: Total knee replacement in morbidly obese patients: results of a prospective, matched study.

    J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88:1321-1326. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  49. Mantilla CB, Horlocker TT, Schroeder DR, Berry DJ, Brown DL: Risk factors for clinically relevant pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis in patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty.

    Anesthesiology 2003, 99:552-560.

    discussion 5A

    PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  50. Bordini B, Stea S, Cremonini S, Viceconti M, De Palma R, Toni A: Relationship between obesity and early failure of total knee prostheses.

    BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009, 10:29. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  51. McKellop HA, Campbell P, Park SH, Schmalzried TP, Grigoris P, Amstutz HC, Sarmiento A: The origin of submicron polyethylene wear debris in total hip arthroplasty.

    Clin Orthop 1995, 311:3-20. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  52. Foran JRH, Mont MA, Etienne G, Jones LC, Hungerford DS: The outcome of total knee arthroplasty in obese patients.

    J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:1609-1615. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  53. Vazquez-Vela Johnson G, Worland RL, Keenan J, Norambuena N: Patient demographics as a predictor of the ten-year survival rate in primary total knee replacement.

    J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2003, 85:52-56. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  54. Jones CA, Cox V, Jhangri GS, Suarez-Almazor ME: Delineating the impact of obesity and its relationship on recovery after total joint arthroplasties.

    Osteoarthr Cartil OARS Osteoarthr Res Soc 2012, 20:511-518. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  55. Collins RA, Walmsley PJ, Amin AK, Brenkel IJ, Clayton RAE: Does obesity influence clinical outcome at nine years following total knee replacement?

    J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012, 94:1351-1355. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  56. Samson AJ, Mercer GE, Campbell DG: Total knee replacement in the morbidly obese: a literature review.

    ANZ J Surg 2010, 80:595-599. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  57. Rajgopal V, Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, Rorabeck CH: The impact of morbid obesity on patient outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.

    J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:795-800. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  58. Abu-Abeid S, Wishnitzer N, Szold A, Liebergall M, Manor O: The influence of surgically-induced weight loss on the knee joint.

    Obes Surg 2005, 15:1437-1442. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  59. Parvizi J, Trousdale RT, Sarr MG: Total joint arthroplasty in patients surgically treated for morbid obesity.

    J Arthroplasty 2000, 15:1003-1008. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/2052-1847/5/25/prepub